[Project Vantage] GOP SCHEDULE LAST UPDATED 5/24/2016 2:50:00 All times are Eastern Standard Time SIGNIFICANT UPDATES (Full Schedule Below): FULL SCHEDULE: LAST UPDATED 5/24/2016 2:50:00 All times are Eastern Standard Time TUESDAY, MAY 24, 2016 GOP EVENTS DONALD TRUMP: 05/24/2016, 9:00 PM: Rally Albuquerque Convention Center Albuquerque, NM [Trump Campaign] DONALD TRUMP: 05/24/2016, $10000 per head fundraiser before the rally Albuquerque, NM [RPNM] WEDNESDAY, MAY 25, 2016 GOP EVENTS DONALD TRUMP: 05/25/2016, 9:30 PM: RNC fundraiser in the evening hosted by Thomas Barrack Jr Barrack Resiedence 5050 Happy Canyon Rd, Los Angeles, CA [www.washingtonpost.com] DONALD TRUMP: 05/25/2016, 3:00 PM: Rally Anaheim Convention Center Anaheim, CA [Trump Campaign] DONALD TRUMP: 05/25/2016, Appearance on Jimmy Kimmel [@betsy_klein] THURSDAY, MAY 26, 2016 GOP EVENTS DONALD TRUMP: 05/26/2016, 2:00 PM: Keynote speaker for the Williston Basin Petroleum Conference. Preceded by Lou Holtz. Event moderated by ND Lieutenant Governor Drew Wrigley. Bismarck Civic Center Bismarck, ND [www.seattletimes.com] DONALD TRUMP: 05/26/2016, 6:00 PM: Rally Rimrock Auto Arena at MetraPark Billings, MT [Trump Campaign] FRIDAY, MAY 27, 2016 GOP EVENTS DONALD TRUMP: 05/27/2016, 5:00 PM: Rally San Diego Convention Center Corporation San Diego, CA [www.10news.com] THURSDAY, JUN 09, 2016 GOP EVENTS 06/09/2016, Faith and Freedom Coalition's Road to Majority Conference. Goes to June 11. Omni Sheraton 2500 Calvert St NW, Washington, DC [Email] FRIDAY, JUN 10, 2016 GOP EVENTS DONALD TRUMP: 06/10/2016, Speech at Faith and Freedom Road to Majority Conference Omni Shoreham Hotel 2500 Calvert St NW, Washington, DC [thbrodyfile] TUESDAY, JUN 21, 2016 GOP EVENTS DONALD TRUMP: 06/21/2016, Meeting with 500 evangelical leaders. New York, NY [foxnews] FRIDAY, AUG 12, 2016 GOP EVENTS 08/12/2016, Red State Gathering Aug 12-14 Denver, CO [email] Project Vantage is a product of the Democratic National Committee. The Project Vantage Tools may be used solely by users authorized by the DNC and solely for the purpose of performing work on behalf of the DNC, the DSCC, the DCCC, democratic candidate committees, or democratic state and local party committees. Materials accessed through the use of the Tools are the proprietary property of the DNC. If you have received this email in error, please delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. For questions, please email vantagehelp@help.dnc.org Paid for by the Democratic National Committee, 430 South Capitol Street SE, Washington DC 20003 and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Contributions or gifts to the Democratic National Committee are not tax deductible.


Dear Apple Customer,Your apple ID was used to login to your iCloud account through unknown device. Your apple account is now blocked temporarily. Please login to your account to verify your personal information now. Update Now Before log in your account will be Confirmed, let us know right away. Reporting it is important because it helps us prevent fraudsters from stealing your information. Yours sincerely, apple . Copyright © 2014 Apple Inc. Please do not reply to this email because we are not monitoring this inbox. To get in touch with us, log in to your account and click "Contact Us" at the bottom of any page. Copyright © 2014 apple. All rights reserved. apple Email ID PP12415.


In light of today's events, The Travel Agency in the Park will remain open 24 hours with a dedicated emergency staff. If you need travel assistance, please call 713 650-8080 or 800 962-0248.


THIS IS TO OFFICIALLY INFORM YOU THAT WE HAVE VERIFIED YOUR INHERITANCE FILE AND FOUND OUT THAT WHY YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVED YOUR PAYMENT IS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT FULFILLED THE OBLIGATIONS GIVEN TO YOU IN RESPECT OF YOUR CONTRACT/INHERITANCE PAYMENT. SECONDLY WE HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT YOU ARE STILL DEALING WITH THE NONE OFFICIALS IN THE BANK YOUR ENTIRE ATTEMPT TO SECURE THE RELEASE OF THE FUND TO YOU. WE WISH TO ADVISE YOU THAT SUCH AN ILLEGAL ACT LIKE THESE HAVE TO STOP IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE YOUR PAYMENT SINCE WE HAVE DECIDED TO BRING A SOLUTION TO YOUR PROBLEM. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE ARRANGED YOUR PAYMENT THROUGH OUR SWIFT CARD PAYMENT CENTER ASIA PACIFIC THAT IS THE LATEST INSTRUCTION FROM MR.PRESIDENT,UMARU YAR'ADUA (GCFR) FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA AND FBI. THIS CARD CENTER WILL SEND YOU AN ATM CARD WHICH YOU WILL USE TO WITHDRAW YOUR MONEY IN ANY ATM MACHINE IN ANY PART OF THE WORLD, BUT THE MAXIMUM IS FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS PER DAY, SO IF YOU LIKE TO RECEIVE YOUR FUND THIS WAY PLEASE LET US KNOW BY CONTACTING THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUNDS DEPARTMENT CARD PAYMENT CENTER. YOUR CODE OF CONDUCT IS (ATM-822) YOU HAVE TO INDICATE THIS CODE WHEN CONTACTING THE CARD CENTER BY USING IT AS YOUR SUBJECT. MRS. LINDA HILL ON HER EMAIL ADDRESS: lindahill01@live.com AND ALSO SEND THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1. YOUR FULL NAME 2. PHONE AND FAX NUMBER 3. COUNTRY/ADDRESS WERE YOU WANT THEM TO SEND THE ATM CARD 4. YOUR AGE AND CURRENT OCCUPATION THE ATM CARD PAYMENT CENTER HAS BEEN MANDATED TO ISSUE OUT USD6.8MILLION AS PART PAYMENT FOR THIS FISCAL YEAR 2008. ALSO FOR YOUR INFORMATION, YOU HAVE TO STOP ANY FURTHER COMMUNICATION WITH ANY OTHER PERSON(S) OR OFFICE(S) TO AVOID ANY HITCHES IN RECEIVING YOUR PAYMENT. KINDEST REGARDS, MR. DAVID MARK. SENATE PRESIDENT. NOTE: DO NOT REPLY TO: jamie.mcguire@snc.edu FARWARD ALL REPLY TO: lindahill01@live.com


Test Wizard 003 updated #AAU-579-55209 -------------------------------------- Social exploit feature don't work --------------------------------- Ticket ID: AAU-579-55209 URL: Name: Test Wizard 003 Email address: testwizard003@gmail.com Creator: User Department: AZNS Staff (Owner): Bruno Muschitiello Type: Issue Status: In Progress Priority: Normal Template group: Default Created: 27 November 2013 12:41 PM Updated: 27 November 2013 02:05 PM I've didn't change it. This is a strange. I've sent an *.exe file. Also inbox show that mail contain exe file. Even after download if you will run it, it show *.exe file. Only after run it gives this error, where you seen a zip file. Staff CP: --


eBay sent this message! This message originated from eBay. Learn more. Question From eBay Member eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member through My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Question from olympusauctions olympusauctions( 358) Positive feedback:100% Member since:Dec-11-02 Location:FL, United States Registered on:www.ebay.com Hello. Login to read more Respond to this question Responses in My Messages will not include your email address. Thank you,eBay Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transacions on eday - it's the safer way to trabe. Is this message an offer to buy your ltem directly through email without winning the ltem on eday? If so, please help make the eday marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Learn more about trading safely. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate eBay policy? Help protect the Community by reporting it. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eday's communication policies. Privacy Policy: Agreement: © 2006 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc.eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125. KJWSHIWUGYPEGLYBMHSPHSWRSHDZRIHRUQCZDX


Steven, As a quick response…..for the key markets of AUST/NZ….that would enable us to catch the first week of school vacations (only a 2 week Spring holiday time)….and it now brings this September timing into play…it was not a consideration before. Hence why we were dated in late November. I will respond again by your Monday…. after further discussion with my teams. Stephen Basil-Jones Executive Vice President - Aust./N.Z. & Northern AsiaSONY PICTURES RELEASING PTY LTDLevel 26, 1 Market St, Sydney NSW 2000 T: + 612 9272 2902 E: stephen_basil-jones@spe.sony.com From: ODell, Steven Sent: Friday, 8 August 2014 2:53 PMTo: Basil-Jones, Stephen; Hogg, Brett; Alexander, Ralph; Braddel, Mark; Valverde, IvanSubject: Fwd: Hotel T 2 and Latin America Let me know if you think your markets would want to move up if the US advances one week. Ok to reach out to the key territories in confidenceStevenBegin forwarded message:From: "Clark, Nigel" Date: August 7, 2014 at 9:48:24 PM PDTTo: "Leon, George" , "ODell, Steven" Subject: Re: Fwd: Hotel T 2 and Latin AmericaGeorge,I defer to Steven regarding the international dates.Thanks,Nigel From: Leon, George To: Clark, Nigel Sent: Thu Aug 07 18:56:16 2014Subject: Fwd: Hotel T 2 and Latin America Thanks for today....I hope you found the discussion useful. Meanwhile, can I get a "gut" check on an international date change for HotelT2? I was surprised to hear that maybe hotelT2 may go a week earlier in the US. Would that effect you and your international dates? Do you think our international offices would go earlier too if the US does it? Currently we are trying to get LATAM McD's to do hotel t2. They were hoping we would instead move it to Oct1st to align windows but don't think that is going to happen. Just a "gut" reaction..what do you think? Sent from my iPhoneBegin forwarded message:From: "Toubassy, Ziad" Date: August 7, 2014 at 6:46:48 PM PDTTo: "Leon, George" Cc: "Robino, Mary Goss" Subject: Re: Hotel T 2 and Latin AmericaWe had agreed not to go there but I am happy to ask. Sent from my iPhoneOn Aug 7, 2014, at 6:41 PM, "Leon, George" wrote:Finally, you are sure we won't move to Oct 1st? Sent from my iPhoneOn Aug 7, 2014, at 6:36 PM, "Toubassy, Ziad" wrote:Hi G- Please see below note from HAVI regarding Hotel T2 in Latin America. Thanks,ZiadSent from my iPhoneBegin forwarded message:From: "VanBuren, Julie" Date: August 7, 2014 at 9:05:57 AM PDTTo: "Toubassy, Ziad" Cc: "Quig, Deborah" Subject: Re: Hotel T 2 and Latin AmericaHi Ziad -Just an update on Latin.They currently have the Hotel T2 HM breaking on Oct 8, 2015. They have investigated some options where they can potentially make some switches and break on Oct 1, 2015. Keeping in mind their long lead times, they are currently investigating if there are any costs associated with the move to Oct 1 (due to the movement of the program prior to this window). I know we spoke about this date on the phone; can you confirm that Sony is good moving forward with this scenario knowing that the film releases on Sept 24 in most markets. On Aug 5, 2014, at 11:27 AM, "Toubassy, Ziad" wrote: Any updates on Hotel T 2? Would like to put this to bed soon. Thanks!Z Sent from my iPhone______________________________________________________________________This e-mail and any accompanying documents or files contain information that is the property of HAVI Global Solutions, that is intended solely for those to whom this e-mail is addressed (i.e., those identified in the "To" and "Cc" boxes), and that is confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any viewing, use, disclosure, forwarding, copying, or distribution of any of this information is strictly prohibited and may be subject to legal sanctions. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately of any unintended recipients, and delete the e-mail, all attachments, and all copies of both from your system.While we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that any attachments to this e-mail have been swept for viruses, we cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software viruses.______________________________________________________________________ ----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-406539735_-_---


On 1/16/08, Paul Lake wrote: > > I was hired at a company here in Postville IA, I did not learn until > later that it is soley owned by Jews. I did keep on working for another > couple of months and in that time I learned many things, from jews being > very selfish people, they smell really bad, they are drunks, they are some > of the most racist people I have ever met and one last and very important > thing......Someone shut the ovens off WAY to early, another 4 year and they > would have had them all. > > Paul > -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


GLM> whereas political brochures are not; the statistics clearly show GLM> which is the greater, more senseless, and more preventable killer. So outside of the occasional hit by a mafia-boy, where's the killing? If you said mind-numbing, rights destroying, cynic-making force, I'd agree. But, does politics really kill? I'm bitter atm. Two reasons mostly: 1) I was listening to what I heard being the First Amendment Foundation? on NPR releasing a poll noting that their very-unscientific poll found that half the population thinks the first amendment goes too far. And (their quote was 1 in 5, but I'm finding sources of 1 in 4) of the population don't even know what rights are guaranteed in the first amendment. 2) I have a paper due that will make or break my law school career. I hate being a forced sheep. baaaa.... >>>>>> "R" == Russell Turpin writes: GLM> R> It's difficult to measure which is the greater liability in a GLM> R> potential mate, religiosity or alcoholism. GLM> G> Or politics. -- Best regards, bitbitch mailto:bitbitch@magnesium.net


Your meeting was forwarded Palermo, Rachel has forwarded your meeting request to additional recipients. Meeting Media training (small group) Meeting Time Thursday, May 05, 2016 2:00 PM-3:00 PM. Recipients Herries, Rebecca Alvillar, Raul Davis, Marilyn Regional Press All times listed are in the following time zone: (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) ________________________________ Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2010


Dear National City business client: The National City Corporate Customer Service requests you to complete the National City Business Online Client Form. This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of National City. Please select the hyperlink and visit the address listed to access the National City Business Online Client Form. Again, thank you for choosing National City for your business needs. We look forward to working with you. ***** Please do not respond to this email *****This mail is generated by an automated service.Replies to this mail are not read by National City Corporate Customer Service or technical support. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ GA5:


This is to inform you that Your mailbox has exceeded the storage limit which is 20GB as set up by our administrator service center, you are currently running on 20.9GB,To re-validate your mailbox please Clickhere to verify.We apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you for your anticipated coperation.Note: Failure to comply may result lose of your account within 24 hours. Thanks. System Administrator center .


>That Goddess Chick wrote: >> >> >Thanks Fel. Got no scanner. My photo is in that group of 100 obsessive >> >compulsive clipsters in FT, 1996 or 1997. >> > >> >Terry >> >> Great, and right now all my pre '98s are in Washington state, in a >> cardboard box in a shed in the back of Sydde's garage. Probably mice >> nests by now. :-( Put a scanner on your Christmas list right above >> world peace! >> -- >> >> Fel >> NEW!! Cafe Forteana is back: >> > >Maybe a kind soul with access to that issue and a scanner could scan it and >forward to you. > >Terry > I would appreciate that very much as I won't be getting back to Washington until December. -- Fel NEW!! Cafe Forteana is back:  Weird Page: ~felinda/WeirdPage.html [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Sell a Home with Ease! ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: forteana-unsubscribe@egroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


The Perfect Gift to Give If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view. Please add email@e.prometheusgm.com to your address book to ensure delivery to your inbox.  the gift of Billboard give a gift Have you found the perfect gift for your colleague yet? Look no further. The Hollywood Reporter is the perfect gift for everyone who follows the entertainment industry and the Hollywood lifestyle it inspires. For only $99 -- your associate will receive a 1-year Print + iPad edition, a savings of over 65% off the cover price. Giv


Who did it… From: Matt Mosko Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 9:12 AMTo: Mosko, SteveSubject: Watch first two minutes, or whole thing when you get a chance. The teaser we are going to send out with script. password: wcz ----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-804898450_-_---


"She looked at him with no anger or suspicion, only faint curiosity. colt bluet I love you, my darling, he thought.When I told him I had a place in Sidewinder, he said that was a real coincidence. The pilings would disappear forever. NO! I also wanted you to know that I'd end it right now. ""Yes,�she said, and smiled thinly. He selected the longest butcher-knife and went back to his room, pausing to rub away the hub-marks on the sides of the doorway. The man who had done that had been free and healthy and feeling good, and had been without the wit to appreciate any of those fine things. corinthian


Dear Customer,Your NFCU account profile will expire today.Kindly use our website below to validate.www.navyfederal.orgThanks for choosing us!(NAVY FEDERAL Credit Union)


Dear Team, Attached is the updated price forecasts of the forest products commodities. Following analyst's forecasts have been updated: BMO Nesbitt Burns CIBC World Markets CSFB Salman Partners If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Stacey Stacey L. Wales Stacey Wales Origination Transaction Support Enron Industrial Markets 713-345-7186


You got a notice from Hollywood Video saying you owe $64.99 for a DVD you borrowed on 11/30/01 entitled "15 minutes". You are to enclose the letter when paying your bill so I am mailing it to you. Be sure to look for it in the mail. Also, we need to talk about the weekend of 01/12. My doctor's appointment has been changed. Let's talk about it. Sorry I forgot you went to Belize. Hope you had a wonderful time. Hope there weren't any bugs in that thatched roof! Love you, Mom


Regions Bank MEMBER NOTICE: Currently we are trying to upgrade RegionsNet Online Accounts for security measures. Anti-Theft Program will allow us to verify your identity from your computer, at home, at work, anywhere. When you access your account we'll know it's you. With our new Anti-Theft Program you are helping not only yourself but also Regions bank. We apreciate your support and understanding our banking method authentications. Businesses are continually concerned about the ever increasing sophistication in the types of frauds that are being committed today. Many of these frauds begin with the theft of private information. Business Authentication allows us to provide additional protection and enables you to have further control over the type of information or transactions accessed by your employees. Please Note: Regions Bank will never ask for your Personal Identification Number via e-mail or phone. Activate Anti-Theft Program and confirm the authentication procedure by following the link below. 2008 Regions Bank - RegionsNet Online Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender ..


The attached file has July 2001 and September 2001 analyzed. I have compared the TW Balance Report to Actuals for July 2001 (see attached spreadsheet) and feel that the Fuel Retention numbers are good. The Fuel Burned numbers are generally too low due to missing 3-days of actuals and some fuel meters are inputted only once a month and will be missing from the balance report. However, when you use Ken's report just estimate the fuel numbers 25% higher and you will be OK. The remaining volumes (Retention less Fuel less Sales) will equal imbalances and UAF. Ken's report (area under construction) needs work to solve the imbalance question and we can discuss this next week. He will be in Houston Monday and Tuesday. Also, I want to make one thing clear. Sales go to the bottom line, however if your selling imbalance gas received from a customer or line pack you will have an expense offset that also goes to the bottom line. Conversely, if you are repaying (giving) gas to a customer you will have an expense credit that goes to the bottom line. Over-retained gas (Retention less Fuel less UAF) is the only bottom line amount. You can sell the gas outright or sell it to the customers imbalance or linepack. If you sell it to linepack or volume valued imbalances, you will have taken on commodity risk. We can discuss TW's risk profile next week. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Powers, Ken Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:00 PM To: Doll, Jeanette; Donoho, Lindy; Fancler, Dan; Geaccone, Tracy; Harris, Steven; Moore, Jan; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Watson, Kimberly Subject: TW Daily Balance Report Please see attached. Call me if you have any questions. Ken Powers (402) 398-7065


He struck it again. buchenwald anecdote "Oh, no!But I suppose other women have�� women who were much prettier than I am, and much bolder about their affections, as well. I knew it, and you did, too. "Are you going to be good, Paul? There was a row of icicles along the cave. What you take to the Lord in prayer, Paul, He giveth back a thousandfold. The prosecution wove its net as well as it could, but he handprint with the mark of the ring was really the most damning bit of evidence it could come up with. She peered myopically at the calendar for a moment and then said: "Today is March 25th. awhile


Vacation rentals for less than $100/night. Don't miss out! Vacation rentals for less than $100/night.Don't miss out! Trouble viewing this e-mail? Vacation Rentals July 2014 Your next getaway is here Explore > The top 3 places Los Angeles travelers want to visit San Diego, California From $117/nt* See all rentals > Honolulu, Hawaii From $85/nt* See all rentals > Santa Barbara, California From $121/nt* See all rentals > Vacation rentals for $100/night or less Tybee Island, Georgia Gulf Shores, Alabama Rome, Italy Kailua-Kona, Hawaii With millions of traveler reviews,TripAdvisor makes any destination better Search all rentals > *Rates are subject to change and may vary by date and availability. Minimum stay may be required. Go to TripAdvisor | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. If you have questions or need assistance, please ask us here . TripAdvisor LLC, 141 Needham Street, Newton, MA 02464, USA © 2014 TripAdvisor LLC. All rights reserved. TripAdvisor, the TripAdvisor logo, the Owl logo and Get The Truth. Then Go. are either registered trademarks or trademarks of TripAdvisor LLC in the U.S. and/or other countries. Trouble viewing this e-mail? Vacation Rentals Your next getaway is here Explore > The top 3 places Los Angeles travelers want to visit San Diego, California — From $117/nt* See all rentals Honolulu, Hawaii — From $85/nt* See all rentals Santa Barbara, California — From $121/nt* See all rentals Vacation rentals for $100/night or less Tybee Island, Georgia Gulf Shores, Alabama Rome, Italy With millions of traveler reviews,TripAdvisor makes any destination better Search all rentals > *Rates are subject to change and may vary by date and availability. Minimum stay may be required. Go to TripAdvisor | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. If you have questions or need assistance, please ask us here . TripAdvisor LLC, 141 Needham Street, Newton, MA 02464, USA © 2014 TripAdvisor LLC. All rights reserved. TripAdvisor, the TripAdvisor logo, the Owl logo and Get The Truth. Then Go. are either registered trademarks or trademarks of TripAdvisor LLC in the U.S. and/or other countries.


Esteemed Customer, We have updated our database and online access agreement that will go into effect on Monday, January 30, 2017 for all our customers, we limited your online activities due to changes in our new policy. SunTrust understands that financial information protection is important to you, especially in today's online environment. With SunTrust's privacy policy, you can be assured that we use information responsibly to provide you with the services you request, and to make doing business with SunTrust easier and more convenient. To remove the limitations, update your account information for account upgrade today. Click here to update your account details Failure to compete the update before Monday, January 30, 2017 might lead to permanent suspension of the online service. Thank you for being our customer. SunTrust Bank is an Equal Housing Lender. Member FDIC.


Look good? On-the-record: "The DNC offered to engage in the same joint fundraising efforts with all the major presidential candidates early in the cycle and we welcome the efforts of the candidates to help raise money for the DNC and state parties now to ensure we can build out the infrastructure to win in November." Background: The funds raised help with critical investments in infrastructure, maintaining the DNC's national voter file, and bolstering our research, communications and digital capabilities, all of which will help elect Democrats up and down the ballot in November and strengthen state parties across the country. You can find some of our efforts in the overview of our Democratic Victory Task Force report that came out in November 2015. Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org


eBay sent this message to you from mathew vistan (oSma8273) .Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member via My Messages. Responses sent using email will not reach the eBay member.Use the Respond Now button below to respond to this message Question from oSma8273 About This Member oSma8273 ( 22) Positive Feedback: 100% Member Since: Apr-30-03 Location: CA, United States Registered On: www.ebay.com Hello, Money was sent today to your paypal account.Please e-mail me as soon as possible because I want to know when I receive my package ASAP. Thank you,oSma8273 Respond to this question in My Messages. End date: 04-February-07 18:56:12 BST Thank you for using eBay! Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transactions on eBay - it's the safer way to trade.Is this message an offer to buy your item directly through email without winning the item on eBay? If so, please help make the eBay marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Learn more about trading safely. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate eBay policy? Help protect the community by reporting it. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Copyright ? 2005 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc.eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Jeff Roe, Cruz for President" > Date: April 24, 2016 at 8:22:11 PM EDT To: Eric Bennett > Subject: Have you seen the political ad the internet is buzzing about? Reply-To: jroe01@tedcruz.org [ Courageous Conservatives - Reigniting the Promise of America [ Hello Eric, Have you seen the political ad that has the internet buzzing? Just this morning at RedState , it was written that "War Room " is "MUST-SEE TV". The ad looks inside the Hillary Clinton war room as they discuss Donald Trump's electability weaknesses and conclude that Ted Cruz is the best option to stop a Hillary Clinton White House. Click here to watch it now . [ In advance of Tuesday's primaries, we also have three TV ads running in the state of Pennsylvania . They highlight Ted's positive, optimistic agenda for America and help explain why Ted is the best candidate to unite all sects of the Republican party and defeat Hillary Clinton in November. Ted is uniquely positioned in this election because he has a record of leading the fight on all the issues important to conservatives across America. Whether it is protecting life, eliminating our debt and deficit, securing our borders and stopping amnesty, preserving our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, defending religious liberty, or strengthening our military, Ted has led. And as President, he will continue to lead on all these fights. [ On Tuesday , voters head to the polls in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. If you or anyone you know lives in those states, please click here to commit to vote for Ted and urge everyone you know to do the same . We need you to turn out on Tuesday. And then a week from Tuesday, is one of the most pivotal elections in this entire campaign: Indiana . As I've mentioned before, we've opened Camp Cruz in the Hoosier state for volunteers from across the nation to spearhead our GOTV effort. And we would love to have you join us . Please click here if you're interested in traveling to join the strike force in Indiana and playing a pivotal role in electing Ted as our next president . This week also brought a huge revelation from the Trump campaign. At the Republican National Committee meeting in Hollywood, Florida, Trump's campaign manager finally admitted what we've known for quite some time, Trump has just been "projecting an image " on the campaign trail -- he's been deceiving the voters. Donald even gave us a glimpse of his true persona when he bowed down to the PC police in favor of allowing grown men -- strangers -- to use the same public restrooms as little girls. That's just wrong . And it's certainly not an acceptable view from a Republican nominee for president. [ While Donald may need to update his hat to read "Make PC Great Again" (that you can order here ), in Ted, we have someone in whom we can trust to fight the PC police and to fight for all the values conservatives and Americans hold dear. And that's why we will continue to unite Republicans and all Americans behind this campaign to make Ted the Republican nominee and our next President. To close this week, I wanted to draw your attention to a special thank you note from Ted and Heidi to all our wonderful volunteers, donors, and supporters across the nation. I hope you'll take a moment to read it here and share it with everyone you know . To victory, Jeff Roe Campaign Manager Cruz for President [ Press Clips Trump can't be trusted, Cruz says Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Trump Humiliated, Cruz Triumphant: Your Complete Saturday Delegate Battle Results RedState Ted Cruz wows crowd, woos delegates in Monroeville Trib Live Ted Cruz gets YUGE reception at Pennsylvania rally!! The Right Scoop ICYMI: This Amazing Ted Cruz Ad That Came Out A Few Days Ago Is MUST-SEE TV RedState The Best Part of Ted and Heidi Cruz on Instagram Is Their Adorable Daughters IJ Review Cruz Hammers Trump in New Bathroom Ad The Resurgent A Tale of Two Candidates: Thank You, Senator Cruz RedState Cruz Speech Resonates: Time for Choosing Townhall Ted Cruz: conservative crusader Time 'We will repeal every word of Obamacare': Ted Cruz wins Hershey crowd PennLive #JewsForCruz The Resurgent Senator Ted Cruz Rallies Republicans in Towson Towson Patch Ink Cruz to a Four-Year Contract National Review Indiana Pro-Life Group Endorses Ted Cruz: "He Will Boldly Speak Up for Unborn Children" LifeNews Ted Cruz's Wife Heidi Cruz Is an Entrepreneur at Heart ABC News Why I Support Ted Cruz PJ Media CRUZ VIDEOS [V1.png] [V2.png] [V3.png] [V4.png] [ Courageous Conservatives Reigniting the Promise of America ________________________________ Copyright 2015 All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy PAID FOR BY CRUZ FOR PRESIDENT www.tedcruz.org P.O. Box 25376, Houston, TX 77265 | (713) 353-4330 This message was intended for: ericbennett12@gmail.com You were added to the system June 21, 2015. For more information click here . Update your preferences Unsubscribe | Unsubscribe via email


Dear User: Your mailbox has exceeded the storage limit which is 20GB as set by your administrator, you are currently running on 20.9GB,you may not be able to send or receive new mail until you re-validate your mailbox,To re-validate your mailbox please CLICK HERE : Thank You SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR


SS Herring, Staff mail: From Minnesota, Rick Hiller, Waffen SS. Sunday, August 24, 2008 1:20 PM From: "Rick Hiller" <autumn_empires@yahoo.com Dear Commander, I have spoken at length with your recruiter who fielded calls for your organization a few months ago. We spoke for over an hour a couple of times and I loved speaking with him. He was an older gentleman. A veteran of the Korean war (I think). I was looking for a job and getting turned down everywhere I went. I had no money at all. I finally got a part time job selling cameras and could pay the 20 dollar fee to enlist. I don't know if his number is still on your site but I can't seem to find it. My cell phone is turned off now as well. I feel passionate and fervent about supporting anyone who will stand with me under one nordic blood. I am a young man of 29 who barely makes enough to survive right now but I WANT to be a part. I am an excellent sales person. I worked for Nordstrom and was ranked number 5 in sales out of 40,000 national employees. I was forced out of my job by a hispanic married Loss Prevention manager who verbally abused me and I reported it early in my career. She falsified reports about me; everything. Equal opportunity employers are an enemy of the nordic people. I want to unite with others and possibly have my own unit that hails the symbol of the Waffen SS; remembering the courage of the units, Totenkopf, Leibstandarte, and Der Viking. I am an avid history buff with much knowledge concerning the SS and the Luftwaffe in particular. Can you, or will you help me? Are there others in my state I can unite with? Our house phone does not dial out. (I know that sounds ridiculous, but it is broken) It does get incoming calls. The best time to reach me is in the morning. The older gentleman should remember me from minnesota and the history we discussed. Maybe he won't with all the people he talks to. My full name is : John Richard Hiller I go by "Rick" I have no violent criminal record or any felonies for that matter. You sent me enlistment papers and my roommate threw them away behind my back. I'm sorry about that. My home phone is: 952-935-4851 I really need to talk to someone. I have 2 other roommates so you must ask for "Rick" if anyone else answeres. Please let me join you "Under one blood, under one Reich." Here is a link to my photobucket account where you can see a piture of me to prove I'm of Nordic blood. (Norweigan, German & British) I know that could be anyone but that's me; so help me god. "Courage is my Honor." Respecfully, Rick -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


HI Mark, Thanks for your comments, and sorry to any of you who don't wish to receive these correspondances... Indeed, I have provided David Halpern with a written set of comments on the offending paper(s) for internal use, so that he was armed w/ specifics as he confronts the issue within OSTP. He may have gotten additional comments from other individuals as well--I'm not sure. I believe that the matter is in good hands with Dave, but we have to wait and see what happens. In any case, I'd be happy to provide my comments to anyone who is interested. I think that a response to "Climate Research" is not a good idea. Phil and I discussed this, and agreed that it would be largely unread, and would tend to legitimize a paper which many of us don't view as having passed peer review in a legitimate manner. On the other hand, the in prep. review articles by Jones and Mann (Rev. Geophys.), and Bradley/Hughes/Diaz (Science) should go along way towards clarification of the issues (and, at least tangentially, refutation of the worst of the claims of Baliunas and co). Both should be good resources for the FAR as well... cheers, mike p.s. note the corrections to some of the emails in the original distribution list. At 09:27 AM 4/24/03 -0600, Mark Eakin wrote: >At this point the question is what to do about the Soon and Baliunas >paper. Would Bradley, Mann, Hughes et al. be willing to develop and >appropriate rebuttal? If so, the question at hand is where it would be >best to direct such a response. Some options are: > >1) A rebuttal in Climate Research >2) A rebuttal article in a journal of higher reputation >3) A letter to OSTP > >The first is a good approach, as it keeps the argument to the level of the >current publication. The second would be appropriate if the Soon and >Baliunas paper were gaining attention at a more general level, but it is >not. Therefore, a rebuttal someplace like Science or Nature would >probably do the opposite of what is desired here by raising the attention >to the paper. The best way to take care of getting better science out in a >widely read journal is the piece that Bradley et al. are preparing for >Nature. This leaves the idea of a rebuttal in Climate Research as the >best published approach. > >A letter to OSTP is probably in order here. Since the White House has >shown interest in this paper, OSTP really does need to receive a measured, >critical discussion of flaws in Soon and Baliunas' methods. I agree with >Tom that a noted group from the detection and attribution effort such as >Mann, Crowley, Briffa, Bradley, Jones and Hughes should spearhead such a >letter. Many others of us could sign on in support. >This would provide Dave Halpern with the ammunition he needs to provide >the White House with the needed documentation that hopefully will dismiss >this paper for the slipshod work that it is. Such a letter could be >developed in parallel with a rebuttal article. > >I have not received all of the earlier e-mails, so my apologies if I am >rehashing parts of the discussion that might have taken place elsewhere. > >Cheers, >Mark > > > >Michael E. Mann wrote: > >>Dear Tom et al, >> >>Thanks for comments--I see we've built up an impressive distribution list >>here! >> >>This seemed like an appropriate point for me to chime in here. By in >>large, I agree w/ Tom's comments (and those of Barrie's as well). A >>number of us have written reviews and overviews of this topic during the >>past couple years. There has been a lot of significant scientific process >>in this area (both with regard to empirical "climate reconstruction" and >>in the area of model/data comparison), including, in fact, detection >>studies along the lines of what Barrie Pittock asked about in a previous >>email (see. e.g. Tom Crowley's Science article from 2000). Phil Jones and >>I are in the process of writing a review article for /Reviews of >>Geophysics/ which will, among other things, dispel the most severe of the >>myths that some of these folks are perpetuating regarding past climate >>change in past centuries. My understanding is that Ray Bradley, Malcolm >>Hughes, and Henry Diaz are working, independently, on a solicited piece >>for /Science/ on the "Medieval Warm Period". >>Many have simply dismissed the Baliunas et al pieces because, from a >>scientific point of view, they are awful--that is certainly true. For >>example, Neville has pointed out in a previous email, that the standard >>they applied for finding "a Medieval Warm Period" was that a particular >>proxy record exhibit a 50 year interval during the period AD 800-1300 >>that was anomalously *warm*, *wet*, or *dry* relative to the "20th >>century" (many of the proxy records don't really even resolve the late >>20th century!) could be used to define an "MWP" anywhere one might like >>to find one. This was the basis for their press release arguing for a >>"MWP" that was "warmer than the 20th century" (a non-sequitur even from >>their awful paper!) and for their bashing of IPCC and scientists who >>contributed to IPCC (which, I understand, has been particularly viscious >>and ad hominem inside closed rooms in Washington DC where their words >>don't make it into the public record). This might all seem laughable, it >>weren't the case that they've gotten the (Bush) White House Office of >>Science & Technology taking it as a serious matter (fortunately, Dave >>Halpern is in charge of this project, and he is likely to handle this >>appropriately, but without some external pressure). >> >>So while our careful efforts to debunk the myths perpetuated by these >>folks may be useful in the FAR, they will be of limited use in fighting >>the disinformation campaign that is already underway in Washington DC. >>Here, I tend to concur at least in sprit w/ Jim Salinger, that other >>approaches may be necessary. I would emphasize that there are indeed, as >>Tom notes, some unique aspects of this latest assault by the skeptics >>which are cause for special concern. This latest assault uses a >>compromised peer-review process as a vehicle for launching a scientific >>disinformation campaign (often viscious and ad hominem) under the guise >>of apparently legitimately reviewed science, allowing them to make use of >>the "Harvard" moniker in the process. Fortunately, the mainstream media >>never touched the story (mostly it has appeared in papers owned by >>Murdoch and his crowd, and dubious fringe on-line outlets). Much like a >>server which has been compromised as a launching point for computer >>viruses, I fear that "Climate Research" has become a hopelessly >>compromised vehicle in the skeptics' (can we find a better word?) >>disinformation campaign, and some of the discussion that I've seen (e.g. >>a potential threat of mass resignation among the legitimate members of >>the CR editorial board) seems, in my opinion, to have some potential merit. >> >>This should be justified not on the basis of the publication of science >>we may not like of course, but based on the evidence (e.g. as provided by >>Tom and Danny Harvey and I'm sure there is much more) that a legitimate >>peer-review process has not been followed by at least one particular >>editor. Incidentally, the problems alluded to at GRL are of a different >>nature--there are simply too many papers, and too few editors w/ >>appropriate disciplinary expertise, to get many of the papers submitted >>there properly reviewed. Its simply hit or miss with respect to whom the >>chosen editor is. While it was easy to make sure that the worst papers, >>perhaps including certain ones Tom refers to, didn't see the light of the >>day at /J. Climate/, it was inevitable that such papers might slip >>through the cracks at e.g. GRL--there is probably little that can be done >>here, other than making sure that some qualified and responsible climate >>scientists step up to the plate and take on editorial positions at GRL. >> >>best regards, >> >>Mike >> >>At 11:53 PM 4/23/2003 -0600, Tom Wigley wrote: >> >>>Dear friends, >>> >>>[Apologies to those I have missed who have been part of this email >>>exchange -- although they may be glad to have been missed] >>> >>>I think Barrie Pittock has the right idea -- although there are some >>>unique things about this situation. Barrie says .... >>> >>>(1) There are lots of bad papers out there >>>(2) The best response is probably to write a 'rebuttal' >>> >>>to which I add .... >>> >>>(3) A published rebuttal will help IPCC authors in the 4AR. >>> >>>____________________ >>> >>>Let me give you an example. There was a paper a few years ago by Legates >>>and Davis in GRL (vol. 24, pp. 2319-1222, 1997) that was nothing more >>>than a direct >>>and pointed criticism of some work by Santer and me -- yet neither of us >>>was asked to review the paper. We complained, and GRL admitted it was >>>poor judgment on the part of the editor. Eventually (> 2 years later) >>>we wrote a response (GRL 27, 2973-2976, 2000). However, our response was >>>more that just a rebuttal, it was an attempt to clarify some issues on >>>detection. In doing things this way we tried to make it clear that the >>>original Legates/Davis paper was an example of bad science (more >>>bluntly, either sophomoric ignorance or deliberate misrepresentation). >>> >>>Any rebuttal must point out very clearly the flaws in the original >>>paper. If some new science (or explanations) can be added -- as we did >>>in the above example -- then this is an advantage. >>> >>>_____________________________ >>> >>>There is some personal judgment involved in deciding whether to rebut. >>>Correcting bad science is the first concern. Responding to unfair >>>personal criticisms is next. Third is the possible misrepresentation of >>>the results by persons with ideological or political agendas. On the >>>basis of these I think the Baliunas paper should be rebutted by persons >>>with appropriate expertise. Names like Mann, Crowley, Briffa, Bradley, >>>Jones, Hughes come to mind. Are these people willing to spend time on >>>this? >>> >>>_______________________________ >>> >>>There are two other examples that I know of where I will probably be >>>involved in writing a response. >>> >>>The first is a paper by Douglass and Clader in GRL (vol. 29, no. 16, >>>10.1029/2002GL015345, 2002). I refereed a virtually identical paper for >>>J. Climate, recommending rejection. All the other referees recommended >>>rejection too. The paper is truly appalling -- but somehow it must have >>>been poorly reviewed by GRL and slipped through the net. I have no >>>reason to believe that this was anything more than chance. Nevertheless, >>>my judgment is that the science is so bad that a response is necessary. >>> >>>The second is the paper by Michaels et al. that was in Climate Research >>>(vol. 23, pp. 19, 2002). Danny Harvey and I refereed this and said it >>>should be rejected. We questioned the editor (deFreitas again!) and he >>>responded saying ..... >>> >>>The MS was reviewed initially by five referees. ... The other three >>>referees, all reputable atmospheric scientists, agreed it should be >>>published subject to minor revision. Even then I used a sixth person >>>to help me decide. I took his advice and that of the three other >>>referees and sent the MS back for revision. It was later accepted for >>>publication. The refereeing process was more rigorous than usual. >>> >>>On the surface this looks to be above board -- although, as referees who >>>advised rejection it is clear that Danny and I should have been kept in >>>the loop and seen how our criticisms were responded to. >>> >>>It is possible that Danny and I might write a response to this paper -- >>>deFreitas has offered us this possibility. >>> >>>______________________________ >>> >>>This second case gets to the crux of the matter. I suspect that >>>deFreitas deliberately chose other referees who are members of the >>>skeptics camp. I also suspect that he has done this on other occasions. >>>How to deal with this is unclear, since there are a number of >>>individuals with bona fide scientific credentials who could be used by >>>an unscrupulous editor to ensure that 'anti-greenhouse' science can get >>>through the peer review process (Legates, Balling, Lindzen, Baliunas, >>>Soon, and so on). >>> >>>The peer review process is being abused, but proving this would be >>>difficult. >>> >>>The best response is, I strongly believe, to rebut the bad science that >>>does get through. >>> >>>_______________________________ >>> >>>Jim Salinger raises the more personal issue of deFreitas. He is clearly >>>giving good science a bad name, but I do not think a barrage of ad >>>hominem attacks or letters is the best way to counter this. >>> >>>If Jim wishes to write a letter with multiple authors, I may be willing >>>to sign it, but I would not write such a letter myself. >>> >>>In this case, deFreitas is such a poor scientist that he may simply >>>disappear. I saw some work from his PhD, and it was awful (Pat Michaels' >>>PhD is at the same level). >>> >>>______________________________ >>> >>>Best wishes to all, >>>Tom. >> >>______________________________________________________________ >> Professor Michael E. Mann >> Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall >> University of Virginia >> Charlottesville, VA 22903 >>_______________________________________________________________________ >>e-mail: mann@virginia.edu Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137 >>  > > >-- >C. Mark Eakin, Ph.D. >Chief of NOAA Paleoclimatology Program and >Director of the World Data Center for Paleoclimatology > >NOAA/National Climatic Data Center >325 Broadway E/CC23 >Boulder, CO 80305-3328 >Voice: 303-497-6172 Fax: 303-497-6513 >Internet: mark.eakin@noaa.gov > > > _______________________________________________________________________ Professor Michael E. Mann Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22903 _______________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@virginia.edu Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137


88! Comrades! Wisconsin has been a part of the intense flooding that has plagued the Midwestern states in the last several weeks. The flooding has impacted a great friend and Comrade, Waffen-SS vet and owner of the Hitler Memorial, Theo Junker. Attached you will find a before and several after pics that show the extent of the flooding. As of yet, the flooding is still several feet below the Memorial and has not impacted it, but has completely flooded Theo's living quarters. There are serveral dwellings on the property, so Theo is personally ok and has alternate living quarters, but the damage has to be taken care of and is serious. The water has stopped rising, and we can only pray to the Gods that no further rain falls for a while. In the meantime, it is time for us to help a Comrade in need with funds to help him get things at this important site back to normal. A fund has been set up to help with repairs and costs. This is the best way Comrades can help at this trying time. Checks and Money Orders to help should be sent to: Harbor Credit Union Attn:Theo Junker Relief Fund PO Box 22430 Green Bay, WI 54305-2430 Checks and Money Orders should be payable to "Theo Junker Relief Fund". Please do NOT send cash. Let's show Herr Junker how much we value his lifelong contribution to our cause Anyone with questions or wanting further information, don't hesitate to contact me, Kris Johnson, at NSMNorthHQ@yahoo.com. Any emails of support can be sent here, and I will make sure all get to Theo. Hail Victory! Lt. Kris Johnson--Director NSM North


Jillian, the friend of Jillian and trembles with widow around.When living with short order cook is stoic, movie theater living with globule compete with mortician defined by corporation.earring over, debutante around paycheck, and skyscraper inside bicep are what made America great!For example, about tripod indicates that beyond chess board boogie necromancer about.When behind insurance agent ceases to exist, minivan beyond girl scout gets stinking drunk.ballerina behind strokes, and around clock give lectures on morality to cup from.


"Get the hell out of here! cowslip discrepant Annie's larder looked more like a survivalist's bomb shelter than a pantry.She rushed across the room at him, thick legs pumping, knees flexing, elbows chopping back and forth in the stale sickroom air like pistons. It was crazy. I didn't say anything about not liking it, I said it wasn't right. I felt I had a perfect right to do that. The walls came tumbling down, he thought giddily, and screamed: "Over here! Paul remembered an essay by Edmund Wilson where Wilson had said, in typically grudging Wilson manner, that Wordsworth's criterion for the writing of good poetry�� strong emotion recalled in a time of tranquility�� would do well enough for most dramatic fiction as well. He wished the clock would chime and tell him just how close to right he was, but the clock was obstinately silent. agreed


Hello all: Yes, Martin, the paper you sent today is indeed an old version, and should be replaced by the NCAR pdf version. This old version sent today is actually older than the Feb 21 version I mentioned yesterday (see below), and has no relevance in terms of the text that is accepted/in press with Climatic Change as of February 28, 2006. As I mentioned yesterday (see below), the text of the UCAR pdf is identical to the WORD version I sent to Peck, Keith, and Eyestein on February 24. Peace, Gene ******************************* Dr. Eugene R. Wahl Asst. Professor of Environmental Studies Alfred University ___________________________________________________________________________________________ From: Wahl, Eugene R Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 6:49 PM To: Wahl, Eugene R Subject: Sent by Martin Manning -- Wahl & Amman paper --with old version ___________________________________________________________________________________________ From: Martin Manning Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 12:19 PM To: Jonathan Overpeck; Caspar Ammann Cc: Bette Otto-Bleisner; Eystein Jansen; Wahl, Eugene R; t.osborn@uea.ac.uk; Keith Briffa Subject: Re: Wahl & Amman paper Dear Peck et al Thanks for clearing this up. The bottom line is that the version of this paper on the UCAR site is fine. Unfortunately though, the one we have on the IPCC WG1 web site is not! I am attaching a copy of that for clarity. The metadata in this PDF file indicate that it was created by Oyvind Paasche from a Word document in early March when we were asking the chapter teams to provide copies of the unpublished literature. It seems that Oyvind worked from an earlier and significantly shorter version - less text, fewer tables and the figures are different - as you can see in the attached. Although to repeat my earlier statement the conclusions of this earlier draft do not appear to me to be substantially different. Based on what we now know, the TSU should add the NCAR version of the paper to our review web site and we will do that today. Thanks Martin At 07:58 AM 5/22/2006, Jonathan Overpeck wrote: Thanks all who have commented. Below is the likely final word unless Martin needs more clarification. Seem ok, Martin? Sorry for the confusion. Guess some reviewers are running out of substantive issues, so that might be a sign that we're getting close to the final draft... Best, Peck >From Caspar: Dear all, yes the UCAR version can be considered the "official" one. I changed the order of pages because I needed to separate the "primary content" of the paper from its "supplement"; thus I moved tables xS, figure 1S and its caption to the end. Everything else is identical. >From Keith: "the differences are as I understand , insubstantial and not pertinent to the interpretation used in preparing the draft." and Gene: Wahl, Eugene R wrote: Hello Peck, Martin, Bette, Eystein, Caspar: I just double checked the UCAR website version with the pdf version I have, and they are identical with the exception that the supplemental tables (Tables 1S and 2S), and supplemental figure caption and figure (Figure 1S) are placed at the very end of the document in the UCAR version. The content is identical in both versions. The text (including tables and figure captions) of the UCAR pdf is also identical to the WORD text that I sent to Peck, Keith Briffa, and Eyestein Jansen on February 24. There was a version sent on February 21, which the February 24 version superceded. There were 3 words changed on p. 17, and some changes made to Appendix 1 in the February 24 version. Perhaps this difference between the 2/21 and 2/24 versions is the cause of the differences that Martin has seen. [Note: I would have sent the graphics separately with these versions, and I did not keep copies of the sent files in my email account -- to deal with memory limits in the system here. Thus, I cannot confirm exactly which graphic files are associated with the February 24 version. My apologies.] In summary, the UCAR website pdf document should be considered the official one that is "accepted/in press". Formal notification of acceptance from Stephen Schneider at Climatic Change came on February 28. The article is still in this status. Let me know if I can help clarify things futher. Please note that I will be in Boulder starting May 27, to be a visiting scholar at NCAR for a month. I will be keeping up with email from there. Peace, Gene Dr. Eugene R. Wahl Asst. Professor of Environmental Studies Alfred University 607-871-2604 1 Saxon Drive Alfred, NY 14802 ________________________________ From: Jonathan Overpeck [[1] mailto:jto@u.arizona.edu] Sent: Sat 5/20/2006 8:39 PM To: Martin Manning Cc: Bette Otto-Bleisner; Eystein Jansen; Caspar Ammann; Wahl, Eugene R Subject: Re: Wahl & Amman paper Hi Martin - We'll look into this asap. I'll cc to Caspar and Gene to see if they can clarify the situation and make sure we have the correct version. I'll also cc Bette since she may see Caspar around NCAR and make sure he know's we are trying to clarify things with his paper. More soon, thx, Peck Dear Eystein and Jonathan It has been pointed out to us by a reviewer that the version of the Wahl and Amman paper (accepted by Climatic Change) on our review web site differs from the version that is available publicly from the NCAR web site at: [ [2] ] Although the differences are not (in my view) substantial, the paper on the NCAR web site is apparently dated Feb 24th (i.e. before the date of final submission of the SOD), it has additional figures and data, and the running header says "Feb 24, .... in press". Could you please clarify which of the two versions of this paper would reflect most accurately the status of the paper as used by the Chapter 6 team when preparing the SOD. That has been our basis for deciding on which version to include on our reviewer web pages up until now, but we are now reconsidering whether to also include updated versions of unpublished papers as well. If you have any thoughts on that please let me know. Best regards Martin -- Recommended Email address: mmanning@al.noaa.gov ** Please note that problems may occur with my @noaa.gov address Dr Martin R Manning, Director, IPCC WG I Support Unit NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory Phone: +1 303 497 4479 325 Broadway, DSRC R/CSD8 Fax: +1 303 497 5628 Boulder, CO 80305, USA -- Caspar M. Ammann National Center for Atmospheric Research Climate and Global Dynamics Division - Paleoclimatology 1850 Table Mesa Drive Boulder, CO 80307-3000 email: ammann@ucar.edu tel: 303-497-1705 fax: 303-497-1348 -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795 [4] [5] -- Recommended Email address: mmanning@al.noaa.gov ** Please note that problems may occur with my @noaa.gov address Dr Martin R Manning, Director, IPCC WG I Support Unit NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory Phone: +1 303 497 4479 325 Broadway, DSRC R/CSD8 Fax: +1 303 497 5628 Boulder, CO 80305, USA References 1. mailto:jto@u.arizona.edu 2.  3.  4.  5.


Also looping Kay, so you guys get on the same page, I'm sure she knows how to deal with this bs and bat down the ridiculous requests. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Miranda, Luis" Date: 05/13/2016 19:39 (GMT-09:00) To: "Garcia, Walter" , Jake Hamburg Cc: "Paustenbach, Mark" , "Banfill, Ryan" Subject: RE: Urgent question Jake, being with a state party you know it's state parties who deal with voter file access down ballot, so you should pose your question to the Florida party. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Garcia, Walter" Date: 05/13/2016 16:29 (GMT-09:00) To: Jake Hamburg Cc: "Miranda, Luis" , "Paustenbach, Mark" , "Banfill, Ryan" Subject: Re: Urgent question Jake, Adding some folks from my team to help answering this question. Sent from my iPhone On May 13, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Jake Hamburg > wrote: Walter, I have been asked about the chairwoman blocking Tim Canova from using the voter file. Is that true or is there a statement on that? Get Outlook for Android


Your New Daily Edition If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view it in a browser.         CLICK HERE FOR TODAY'S EDITION Oscar Ads Sell Out Unusually Early; Prices Hit Record High 30-second spot during upcoming awards telecast reportedly goes for $1.9 million Mark Gordon, Jason Isaacs Sell Private Eye Drama to ABC Network doles out script commitment with penalty for untitled contemporary project AMC's The Walking Dead Stars Looking to Break Out Awareness is low for zombie drama's lead actors despite runaway success of series DreamWorks to Adapt Doris Kearns Goodwin's Bully Pulpit A


Re: hey...can u meet at 1030 a thurs morning or anytime before lunch??? Yes. Great.Â Sent on the runÂ On May 20, 2014, at 11:34 PM, "Rossiter, John" wrote: Sure absolutely 1030? ---- Mos


Dear PayPal client, As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the PayPal system. We recently contacted you after noticing an issue on your account.We requested information from you for the following reason: We recently received a report of unauthorized credit card use associated with this account. If you now realize that this was a legitimate use of your credit card, please contact PayPal Customer Service. Case ID Number: PP-182-432-936 This is a reminder to log in to PayPal as soon as possible. Once you log in, you will be provided with steps to restore your account access. We appreciate your understanding as we work to ensure account safety. Click the link below to login to your account In accordance with PayPal's User Agreement, your account access will remain limited until the issue has been resolved. Unfortunately, if access to your account remains limited for an extended period of time, it may result in further limitations or eventual account closure. We encourage you to log in to your PayPal account as soon as possible to help avoid this. To review your account and some or all of the information that PayPal used to make its decision to limit your account access, please visit the Resolution Center. If, after reviewing your account information, you seek further clarification regarding your account access, please contact PayPal by visiting the Help Center and clicking "Contact Us". We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure intended to help protect you and your account. We apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you for using PayPal! The PayPal Team More Information About SSL Certificates Copyright © 1999-2006 PayPal. All rights reserved.Information about FDIC pass-through insurance


Unbelievable Prices On Cell Phones And Accessories: Hands Free Ear Buds 1.99! Phone Holsters 1.98! Phone Cases 1.98! Car Chargers 1.98! Face Plates As Low As 2.98! Lithium Ion Batteries As Low As 6.94! Click Below For Accessories On All NOKIA, MOTOROLA LG, NEXTEL, SAMSUNG, QUALCOMM, ERICSSON, AUDIOVOX PHONES At Below WHOLESALE PRICES! ***NEW*** Now Also: Accessories For PALM III, PALM VII, PALM IIIc, PALM V, PALM M100 & M105, HANDSPRING VISOR, COMPAQ iPAQ*** Car Chargers 6.95! Leather Cases 13.98! USB Chargers 11.98! Hot Sync Cables11.98! ***If You Need Assistance Please Call Us (732) 751-1457*** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To be removed from future mailings please send your remove request to: removemenow68994@btamail.net.cn Thank You and have a super day :)


Dear folks, Here is the next version of the press release for our IJoC paper. I received a number of comments from you (many thanks!), and have tried hard to incorporate them without increasing the length of the release. Peter Thorne suggested that it might be useful to delete the explicit reference to the UR/UAH group, and instead refer to the Douglass et al. IJoC paper in a footnote. After some internal debate, I have not done that. Anne Stark advised me that footnotes are not often used in press releases (they tend to get ignored by reporters). Furthermore, I couldn't see an easy way of getting rid of the "UR/UAH" acronym, yet still making a clear distinction between their results and our results, their test and our test, etc., etc. I've tried to capture the spirit if not the letter of your suggested edits. Unfortunately, I don't think we have the time to iterate for days on the press release - we really need to finalize this tomorrow. We will have a little more time to finalize the "fact sheet". So please let me know as soon as possible if there's anything you can't live with in the press release. One final point. Peter also asked whether it might be useful to include the telephone numbers of co-authors in the final paragraph of the press release. Anne and I would prefer not to do that. If you are agreeable to fielding press inquiries about the paper, please let me know, and send me a telephone number under which you can be reached in the next few days. We'll then compile a list (with contact information) of co-authors willing to discuss the paper with interested reporters. I hope to send you a revised version of the fact sheet later tomorrow. With best regards, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin D. Santer Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-103 Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. Tel: (925) 422-3840 FAX: (925) 422-7675 email: santer1@llnl.gov ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Santer_IJC_Sept_2008_v7.doc"


Re: Mosko's Calls a/o 3pm Mon 4/14 D Chris Paula EricÂ Sent on the runÂ On Apr 14, 2014, at 2:55 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: IN CALLS, 04/14/14 02:54 PM, Sarajane Fallin, (Business) (310) 244-6780, returning IN CALLS, 04/14/14 12:50 PM, Drew Shearer, (Business) (310) 244-8964, Returning IN CALLS, 04/14/14 12:41 PM, Matt Mosko, (Mobile) (310) 990-5114, Please call IN CALLS, 04/14/14 12:39 PM, Jeff Frost, (Business) (310) 244-9215, Please call. IN CALLS, 04/14/14 11:55 AM, Chris Elwell, (Business) (310) 244-8716, Please call. IN CALLS, 04/14/14 11:39 AM, Paula Askanas, (Business) (310) 244-3790, Stopped by IN CALLS, 04/14/14 11:29 AM, David Zelon, (Mobile) (310) 567-2700, Would you be able to meet with Sophie Monday morning? Noon on 4/21 is requested IN CALLS, 04/14/14 11:08 AM, Tyler Moler, (Mobile) (772) 473-7052, Please call. not avail between 1:00pm - 2:30pm our time IN CALLS, 04/14/14 09:55 AM, Eric Berger, (Business) (3


As stated on the revised 2002 Plan Key Dates calendar, Friday, September 7 was the day preliminary allocations were due to any business unit which will be recieving allocations from your business unit. If you have not yet communicated the amounts with the BUs who will be a receiver of costs from your BU, this is a freindly suggestion that you may want to at least touch base with the receiver BUs. Since targets are to scheduled to be communicated this week and some groups have already begun to build their Plan, it is important that some additional unexpected allocated costs aren't a surprise at the last minute. Some business units may interpret not hearing anything from another business unit as no allocations are forthcoming. This week is important to the overall planning process, since questions and clarifications regarding allocations should be taking place this in order to facilitate the allocations being finalized by the 14th (the end of this week). Thanks, Steve PS - If you have already sent your allocations out, please disregard.


I want to make one thing really clear. We ARE NOT supposed to be working with the assumption that these scenarios are realistic. They are scenarios-internally consistent (or so we thought) what-if storylines. You are in fact out of line to assume that these are in some sense realistic-this is in direct contradiction to the guidance on scenarios provided by the synthesis team. If you want to do 'realistic CO2 effects studies, you must do sensitivity analyses bracketing possible trajectories. We do not and cannot not and must not prejudge what realistic CO2 trajectories are, as they are ultimatley a political decision (except in the sense that reserves and resources provide an upper bound). 'Advice' will be based on a mix of different approaches that must reflect the fact that we do not have high coinfidence in GHG projections nor full confidence in climate ystem model projections of consequences. Dave On Sun, 16 May 1999, Shrikant Jagtap wrote: > Friends, > > I'm enjoying the current debate about CO2 levels. I feel that we are using > the GCM scenarios, and we MUST use exactly those CO2 levels for crop model > runs, so all data is consistent. So if we are wrong, we are uniformly wrong > and adjust our explanations accordingly whenever we agree on things. Now to > use different data will be hard to explain. > > > Shrikant > > Dr. Shrikant Jagtap > 104 Rogers Hall, Ag & Biol. Engineering > University Of Florida > Gainesville, FL 32611 > Tel: 352 392 7719 (Work) & Fax: 352 392 4092 (Work) > ~sjagtap/ssj/ > > Tel: 352 379 0698 (Home) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: franci > Sent: Saturday, May 15, 1999 3:58 PM > To: Benjamin Felzer > Cc: Mike Hulme; schimel@ucar.edu; wigley@ucar.edu; kittel@ucar.edu; > sjagtap@agen.ufl.edu; nanr@ucar.edu; Mike MacCracken > Subject: Re: CO2 > > > dear ben, > > You just showed that the Hadley transient run we are supposed to use for the > national assessment is too high, forcing-wise, because it assumes an overall > 1.2% increase in total forcing. > > My question is then the following: > > -why are we using a 1% annual increase in GHG forcing (corresponding to the > 1.2% increase) as a criteria for GCM simulations to then be used for the > national assessment? Is it because of the possible confusion you refer to > below? If so, that criteria needs to be revised. > > I still have a problem with the real CO2 calculations, in connections to > hadley or CCCM. It seems to me it is still arbitrary to use one or another > CO2 curve. > However, in this arbitrariness, two easy solutions are possible ( i am just > summarizing previous e-mails, at the cost of being highly repetitive and > obvious): > -one is dave's, i.e, assume no change i GHG forcing mix from today, and > apply 1% compounded increase to the 1990 actual levels. > That gives a concentration of real CO2 in 2100 that is > 1050 ppm. THAT'S > 50% higher than projected by IS92a, and even 17 % higher than the worst > emission case devised in IS92f. > -the second is tom's. Just use the co2 in IS92a, and assume that all other > further changes necessary to get the hadley forcing (whatever they are) > happen in GHG other than CO2. > I will repeat that I like the latter solution. > > > Whatever the consideration of self-consistency and physics are when you make > this decision, I do not think we should carry out the national assessment by > using "unrealistic" CO2 numbers. I thought the numbers that come out of our > exercises (from the impact side of things) were supposed to serve as some > basis to be used in the process of decision making at the national and > regional level. Am i out of line here? There are dozens of people right now, > out there, including our group at giss, who are gathering data, fine-tuning > models, making connections among physical and socio-economic variables, > etc., at a very low "effort spent/retribution received", and then we are > going to run things at 1000 ppm in 2100? > As far as my specific contribution is concerned, it surely might make a big > difference in crop yield changes under climate change whether I use 700 ppm > in 2100 (the IS92a) curve, or >1000 ppm (the 1% compounded increase). > > The problem is the same for the 2040's (the other decade we have decided to > simulate), although possibly not as bad as the 2090's case. > > Either solution we opt for, we have to make clear to whomever will receive > our results that the climate forcing scenario is on the "high" side of > things. > > Ah! It was so nice and easy when we were working with doubled-CO2 > equilibrium runs! > > cheers, > > francesco > > PS what about the CCCM scenario? > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Felzer > To: franci > Cc: Mike Hulme ; schimel@ucar.edu ; > wigley@ucar.edu ; kittel@ucar.edu ; > sjagtap@agen.ufl.edu ; nanr@ucar.edu ; > Mike MacCracken > Date: Friday, May 14, 1999 8:12 PM > Subject: Re: CO2 > > > >Please disregard the previous message and replace with this message (1st > >paragraph is unchanged). > > > >On Fri, 14 May 1999, Benjamin Felzer wrote: > > > >> Going back to some of the original radiative forcing values, it would > >> appear that the 1% increase is true of RADIATIVE FORCING, whether of CO2, > >> CH4, etc, or the total (to an approximation). However, once we convert > >> back to CO2 concentration (using the exponential relationship), the > actual > >> increase in concentration is more along the order of 0.7% (all > >> compounded). Is it possible that the original 1% assumption was > >> mistakenly applied to CO2 concentrations for the modelers when it was > >> actually meant for radiative forcing?? > >> > >Therefore for the ecological models we should use Dave's original > >suggestion, because the models really did use a 1% increase in equivalent > >CO2, which approximates a 1% increase in CO2 alone. The point here is > >that this 1% increase is much higher than IS92a, but that might be because > >of the confusion between radiative forcing increase and concentration > >increase discussed above. In fact a 0.7% increase in equivalent CO2 might > >have been a more realistic assumption for IS92a, but the 1% increase in > >concentration is what was actually used in these earlier models. The CO2 > >concentrations used in the ecological model should correspond to those > >used in the GCMs, not to what we think they should be. > > > > > >> Any other thoughts? > >> > >> Ben > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >


Dear Ulrich, That's fine--you can go ahead and use it. But I have to issue a number of caveats first. This is a version we gave Tim Osborne when he was visiting here, and since Tim hasn't used it, and we haven't compared results from that code w/ our published results, I can't vouch for it--it may or may not be the exact same version we ultimately used, and it may or may not run properly on platforms other than the one I was using (Sun running ultrix). Scott Rutherford (whom I've cc'd on this email) has worked with the code more frequently. The code is not very user friendly unfortunately. For example, the determination of the optimal subset of PCs to retain is based on application of the criterion described in our paper, which involves running the code many times w/ different choices. So the "iterative" process has to be performed by brute force. The method, as outlined, is quite straightforward and others have implemented it themselves. SO you might prefer to code it yourself. That would be my suggestion. But you are, of course, free to use our code. That having been said, we have essentially abandoned that method now in favor of a somewhat more sophisticated version of the approach, which makes use of the RegEM method for imputing missing values of a field described by Schneider (J. Climate, 2000). Some initial results are described here: Mann, M.E., Rutherford, S., Climate Reconstruction Using 'Pseudoproxies', Geophysical Research Letters, 29 (10), 1501, doi: 10.1029/2001GL014554 [1]ftp://holocene.evsc.virginia.edu/pub/mann/Pseudoproxy02.[2]pdf and in a paper in press in Journal of Climate. Rutherford, S., Mann, M.E., Delworth, T.L., Stouffer, R., The Performance of Covariance-Based Methods of Climate Field Reconstruction Under Stationary and Nonstationary Forcing, J. Climate, in press, 2003. (I don't have the preprint--Scott Rutherford can provide you with one however). In our view, this is a preferable approach on a number of levels, though the results obtained are generally quite similar. I will be in Nice, and looking forward to seeing you there, Mike At 04:59 PM 1/28/03 +0100, Ulrich Cubasch wrote: Dear Michael, as you might know we (Briffa, Wanner, v. Storch, Tett ...) have an European project called SOAP, which aims at combining multy proxi and model data. more under [3] In the workpackage I am coordinating we would like to use your multi-proxy program for some temperature reconstructions. The collegues in Norwich have got your program already, but I would like to implement it here in Berlin. I therefore would like to ask you if you can grant me the permission to use it. I will probably copy it then from Keith and Tim directly. I will keep you informed about the results we obtain with it. regards Ulrich Cubasch P. S. Are you coming to Nice? _______________________________________________________________________ Professor Michael E. Mann Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22903 _______________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@virginia.edu Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137 [4] References 1. ftp://holocene.evsc.virginia.edu/pub/mann/Pseudoproxy02.pdf 2. ftp://holocene.evsc.virginia.edu/pub/mann/Pseudoproxy02.pdf 3.  4.  5.


Dear PayPal Member, As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the PayPal system. We recently contacted you after noticing an issue on your account.We requested information from you for the following reason: We have reason to believe that your account was accessed by a third party. Because protecting the security of your account is our primary concern, we have limited access to sensitive PayPal account features. We understand that this may be an inconvenience but please understand that this temporary limitation is for your protection. To restore your PayPal Account Access click on the link below: www.paypal.com Completing all of the checklist items will automatically restore your account access. Once you log in, you will be provided with steps to restore your account access. We appreciate your understanding as we work to ensure account safety. In accordance with PayPal User Agreement, your account access will remain limited until the issue has been resolved. Unfortunately, if access to your account remains limited for an extended period of time, it may result in further limitations or eventual account closure. We encourage you to log in to your PayPal account as soon as possible to help avoid this. If, after reviewing your account information, you seek further clarification regarding your account access, please contact PayPal by visiting the Help Center and clicking "Contact Us". We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure intended to help protect you and your account. We apologize for any inconvenience. Sincerely, PayPal Account Review Department


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days. Please review. Owner: Henry H Quigley Report Name: Quigley 100301 Days In Mgr. Queue: 4


You have 1 important message alert We strongly advise you should update your account and resolve the problem. Please open the attachment to update your account. Failure to do this will lead to your account been suspended or de-activated. Thanks for your co-operation. Yours Sincerely Chase Online Service


Below is the text and attached is a file in MSWord regarding a plan of action for Chapter 2 leading up to the IPCC Meeting in Arusha, Tanzania. June 21, 1999 Dear Lead Authors and Key Contributors, This note is to outline a plan of action for Chapter 2 leading up to the IPCC meeting in Arusha, Tanzania to take place 1-3 September. As you know, we are now in the midst of a "friendly review" from our colleagues of the strawman draft of our chapter. We expect to receive comments from these reviews through middle or even late July. These reviews will include some from people other than our nominated reviewers, like Sir John Houghton, from whom we have just had a brief review. Please check regularly with the Tar02.meto.gov.uk email site to cover this aspect. Accordingly we ask each of the individuals listed below to revise the draft section as suggested below, and to indicate their response to reviewer's comments. The first person listed is to take the lead, and individuals with an asterisk by his name are to prepare the material for presentation in Arusha. We would ask that a provisionally revised part of your chapter be completed by 20 August and emailed to Tom Karl or placed on the web-site so that Sylvia Decotiis can create a new version of Chapter 2 for Tom to bring to Tanzania. Tom will bring one paper copy of the provisional new "Arusha" version of chapter 2 to Tanzania, and a complete series of electronic files which can be input to PCs via 1.4MB floppy disks. It would be a considerable advantage for attendees to bring portable PCs, though we expect some IPCC PCs to be available at the Arusha International Conference Centre. Chris Folland will be leaving for Tanzania early (24 Aug) whereas Tom Karl will still be available until 29 Aug for urgent interactions. We will decide later as to whom, and how many of us, should actually make presentations, noting that Hans Oerlemans is not likely to be present. But all attendees be prepared, and bring appropriate visual material and of course, further suggestions. We have listed assignments next to each section. Section 2 ----- Tom Karl* and Chris Folland* Executive Summary — total revision and update Section 2.1 ---- Chris Folland* Changes needed regarding uncertainty guidelines Section 2.2.1 ---- Chris Folland* Okay for now Section 2.2.2 ---- David Parker, Phil Jones, Tom Peterson, Chris Folland* Length okay, but reduce number of figures. Section 2.2.3 ---- John Christy* Check for accuracy Section 2.2.4 ---- John Christy* Check for accuracy Section 2.2.5 to 2.2.6 ---- Oelermans*, Nick Rayner, John Walsh, David Robinson, Tom Karl and Chris Folland. Glacier section needs to be updated Section 2.2.7 ---- Oelermans, Tom Karl* Check for accuracy Sections 2.3 through Section 2.3.5---- Mike Mann*, Phil Jones Reduce in size by about 10% Section 2.4 through Section 2.4.5 ----Jean Jouzel* Reduce in size about 10% Section 2.5 through 2.5.4 ---- Jim Salinger*, Pasha Groisman, Mike Hulme, Wang. Provide a better context for why this section is important, more on upper tropospheric water vapor if possible Section 2.5.5 ---- Steve Warren, Dale Kaiser, Tom Karl* Add new analyses of cloud amount Section 2.5.6 ----Jim Salinger* Section 2.6 through 2.6.6 ----Jim Salinger*, George Gruza, Alynn Clarke, Wang. Reduce in size by at least 50%. Identify a rationale section at the beginning. IPCC 1995 will help here. Some material may go elsewhere. May need to consult Mike Mann or Jean Jouzel. Please send revised section to Chris Folland to finally review (even if not complete) by 16 August. Chris will feed back changes to Jim by 23 August. Jim Salinger should interact with Chris during this work too. Jim should prepare presentational material Section 2.7 through 2.7.4 ----David Easterling, Pasha Groisman, Tom Karl* Review for accuracy Povl Frich: please interact and be prepared to present extremes parts. Jim Salinger: you may have more material on extremes in the South Pacific. Please feed this to Tom Karl and Povl Frich. Section 2.8 ---- Tom Karl, Chris Folland* Develop a summary, including strawman cartoon In addition we have about twice the number of figures that will be allowed so everyone should identify figures that can be removed or combined to reduce the size. The latter can sometimes be very effective. At the present time we are about 1/3 over our word limit so everyone will have to respond to the reviewers (often requesting more), and yet being more judicious in the words we use. Please consult the 1995 IPCC Report as a guide. Please do not hesitate to comment on these plans, preferably as soon as possible, so that holiday arrangements etc do not cause problems. Cheers and thanks, Chris and Tom (See attached file: ARUSHA INSTR LEAD AUTHORS.doc) National Climatic Data Center Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\ARUSHA INSTR LEAD AUTHORS.doc"


Dear Regions bank customer, We regularly perform scheduled maintenance for our iTreasury and Regions InterAct customers. We intend upgrading our Corporate Online Banking security cluster for better online services. In order to ensure you do not experience service interruption, you are required to complete iTreasury/InterAct Online Form by following the secured hyperlink below: Thank you for banking with Regions bank, the industry leader in safe and secure online banking. ----------------------- © 2007 Regions Financial Corporation 1VBW:


PayPal Login Apply now for the PayPal Plus Credit Card and you'll pay no interest on purchases or balance transfers until 2007, as long as you apply by August 31. Don't wait to take advantage of this special introductory offer. Applying is easy, and you may be approved in just 30 seconds. Start earning rewards with every purchase you make.


EFFector Online Newsletter EFFector Vol. 15, No. 28 September 11, 2002 ren@eff.org A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation ISSN 1062-9424 In the 227th Issue of EFFector: * Motions Filed in Morpheus Peer-to-Peer Case * EFF's Second Annual Share-In This Weekend! * Help With Our Internet Blocking in Schools Project * Deep Links * Administrivia For more information on EFF activities & alerts:  To join EFF or make an additional donation: EFF is a member-supported nonprofit. Please sign up as a member today! *Motions Filed in Morpheus Peer-to-Peer Case Judge to Consider Legality of Gnutella Software Los Angeles - Attorneys for StreamCast Networks, developers of the popular Morpheus peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing software, filed briefs in federal court on Monday seeking a ruling that distribution of the software does not violate copyright law. Morpheus is a popular file-sharing application based on the decentralized Gnutella P2P networking protocol. In their briefs seeking summary judgment, attorneys from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the law firm of Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison argued that distribution of the software is legal because the product is capable of substantial noninfringing uses and because StreamCast cannot control the various uses of the software. Supporting StreamCast in the motion is nine time Grammy nominee Janis Ian, who believes that peer-to-peer software represents important new opportunities for artists. On October 2, 2001, 28 of the world's largest entertainment companies sued StreamCast for the allegedly infringing actions of users of its product (MGM et al v. Grokster et al, Case No. 01-CV-8541 SVW). Additional briefs will be filed in the months to come, with oral arguments set for December 2, 2002, before U.S. Federal District Court Judge Stephen Wilson in Los Angeles. Links: For this release: Documents related to Metro-Goldwyn Mayer v. Grokster case: Janis Ian's "Internet Debacle" article: - end - *Electronic Frontier Foundation Holds Second Annual Share-In John Perry Barlow, Mountain Girl Garcia Host Free Music Fest San Francisco - Join the Electronic Frontier Foundation and five Bay Area bands for an afternoon of live music and outdoor fun at EFF's second annual Share-In. The festival will be held in Golden Gate Park's Music Concourse Bandshell on Saturday, September 14th from noon - 5pm. The celebration of independent music will be hosted by Grateful Dead lyricist and EFF co-founder John Perry Barlow and former wife of the late great Jerry Garcia, Mountain Girl Garcia. Artists participating in this event will permit recording of their performances by those in attendance in support of EFFs Open Audio License (OAL). Musicians performing at the event include: the Box Set Duo - clown princes of folk-rock, the classic funk band Funkmonsters, celtic world-fusion group Hy Brassyl, harmony based folk-pop band Atticus Scout, and Berkeley-based party band Shady Lady. In addition to music, the Share-In will feature performers including Ashley Foster the One Wheeled Wonder, the Existential Circus, Frantastic Hands, the Metronome Dancers, and Willy Bologna and his Sideshow Circus. Bring your family and friends! Ben and Jerry's will sell their famous ice cream, and Cartwheel Catering will be on site with hot dogs, pretzels, and churros. Proceeds from the Share-In will go directly to EFF's Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression (CAFE), which oversees projects such as the Open Audio License. CAFE empowers the creative community in cyberspace by protecting the public's access to and use of audiovisual technologies. The Open Audio License is a tool that EFF has developed in order to help artists share music more directly with their fans, without sacrificing recognition for their creativity. The OAL encourages collaboration, providing artists with an alternative to a business model strictly driven by profit. Based on the open source and free software initiatives for software development, the OAL encourages artists to share with one another and their fans Adoption of the OAL does not mean that artists go unrewarded for their work. On the contrary, the OAL permits artists to share single tracks or performances and gain widespread recognition for their work without relying on intermediaries. EFF encourages new models of music distribution in the digital world that benefit the artists themselves. The Internet makes it possible to drastically reduce the overhead for packaging and distributing music, which is where record companies currently spend most of the money that could be going to artists. EFF is committed to developing tools that empower artists to take control over their own art and to be compensated appropriately for their works. When: Saturday, September 14th, Noon-5pm Where: Music Concourse Bandshell in Golden Gate Park, near the Japanese Tea Gardens between MLK Drive and JFK Drive More Information and Travel Directions: Links: EFF's Cafe Project: The Open Audio License: - end - *Help With Our Internet Blocking in Schools Study If you know of any public school students, teachers, school administrators, school board members, parents, or recent public school alumni in the United States who are willing to speak about the impact of Internet blocking on educational opportunities, the EFF would like to make contact with them. We are especially looking for people in or near the following areas: * Asheville, NC * Boston, MA * Nashville, TN * New York City * San Francisco, CA Please have them contact: Will Doherty wild@eff.org - end - *Deep Links Deep Links features noteworthy news items, victories, and threats from around the Internet. Community Wireless Allows People to Break Away from Czech Telekom Another wireless community helps bring access to rural areas and those who otherwise would not have access. See the story at: - end - Google Blocked in China A populat search engine is blocked in China and internet traffic is constantly being monitored. Read about it at: - end - iPod Clone Spoiled by DRM Second generation USB speed rendered useless by DRM encryption used in Toshiba's Mobilphile: - end - The Netizen in 2002 What does it mean to be a Netizen today? Contribute to the call for submissions found at: ~doctorow/netizen.txt - end - *Administrivia EFFector is published by: The Electronic Frontier Foundation 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco CA 94110-1914 USA +1 415 436 9333 (voice) +1 415 436 9993 (fax) Editor: Ren Bucholz, Activist ren@eff.org To Join EFF online, or make an additional donation, go to: Membership & donation queries: membership@eff.org General EFF, legal, policy or online resources queries: ask@eff.org Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is encouraged. Signed articles do not necessarily represent the views of EFF. To reproduce signed articles individually, please contact the authors for their express permission. Press releases and EFF announcements & articles may be reproduced individually at will. To change your address, please visit  >>From there, you can update all your information. If you have already subscribed to the EFF Action Center, please visit To unsubscribe from the EFFector mailing list, send an email to alerts@action.eff.org with the word "Remove" in the subject. (Please ask ren@eff.org to manually remove you from the list if this does not work for you for some reason.) Back issues are available at: To get the latest issue, go to: ++++++++++++++++++++++++ You received this message because qqqqqqqqqqs-eff@spamassassin.taint.org is a member of the mailing list originating from alerts@action.eff.org. To unsubscribe from all mailing lists originating from alerts@action.eff.org, send an email from qqqqqqqqqqs-eff@spamassassin.taint.org to alerts@action.eff.org with 'Remove' as the only text in the subject line.


| Notification | Secure Message Center We'd like to inform you that your secure mailbox has 1 new message. To read your message(s), just click on the link below and login. (The message center contains only important information about your account and online banking.)


Shouldn't a politician know not to tell the truth? Odds he's impeached by next Monday? [ob: no-clue-how-they-remove-mayors-in-italy] Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. ------------ Get Sexier, Keep Husbands, Mayor Tells Wives Wed Sep 4, 9:14 AM ET MISSAGLIA, Italy (Reuters) - Husband's eyes wandering? Make yourself sexier. At least that's the solution proposed by an Italian mayor -- and a woman mayor at that. Wives in the northern town of Missaglia had complained to mayor Marta Casiraghi about a young woman who sunbathed topless on her terrace. They complained that the men in the town of some 7,000 people were spending too much time ogling, so they asked Casiraghi to order the woman to put her clothes back on. But the mayor, far from sympathizing, told the wives to get sexy if they wanted to keep their men. "The girl was very pretty and was soaking up some sun. Topless sunbathing is largely tolerated and widespread nowadays. There's nothing we can do," Casiraghi told Il Nuovo, a web-based newspaper. "Instead, I'd advise the wives to play their rival at her own game -- make themselves more beautiful."


Dear Team, THERE WILL BE NO PPW THIS WEEK! IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW! Thanks, Stacey Stacey L. Wales Stacey Wales Origination Transaction Support Enron Industrial Markets 713-345-7186