Ted Cruz's fellow lawmakers may decide his fate at an open GOP convention Washington (CNN)House and Senate Republicans are quickly being selected as delegates to the Republican National Convention this summer, potentially giving them tremendous sway in helping choose the party's presidential candidate if Donald Trump fails to clinch the nomination outright. And that could be a challenge for Sen. Ted Cruz, who has labeled many of his Capitol Hill colleagues as part of a corrupt "Washington cartel." In Kentucky, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was selected over the weekend as a delegate to the convention in Cleveland this summer. Trump supporter Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama is a delegate as well. And in North Carolina, a member of the House GOP leadership, Rep. Patrick McHenry, is expected to be a delegate, as is Sen. Thom Tillis. In interviews with CNN, a wide range of lawmakers refused to say how they'd vote once most delegates are free to vote their conscience after a first round of balloting. "Depending on how some decisions are going to be made, I could be part of helping the delegates as a whole make that decision" of selecting the nominee, Tillis said. "I'm legitimately uncommitted." The GOP lawmakers' presence adds a new wrinkle to the prospects of an open convention in July. While many congressional Republicans are planning on skipping what could be an unruly convention to worry about their own reelection campaigns, others are poised to play an outsized role if no candidate can secure the 1,237 delegates to clinch the nomination before July. While Cruz has succeeded by courting an array of delegates who back his candidacy, many are simply undecided about how they'd vote in a contested convention -- including influential members of Congress. McConnell, for one, could hold sway with many of his state's 46 delegates. The GOP leader, who has been a frequent Cruz punching bag, has been stressing electability over ideology -- that the party should nominate a candidate who could defeat the Democratic nominee, likely Hillary Clinton. That mirrors an argument that Ohio Gov. John Kasich, in particular, has been making as he tries to appeal to delegates. "It could be a really interesting convention," McConnell told Kentucky Republicans attending their state party's convention in Lexington on Saturday. "One thing I want to assure you is there isn't any sort of insider effort that could go on to keep this from being anything other than a pretty open, transparent process." The delegation includes Gov. Matt Bevin, Sen. Rand Paul and House members, including Rep. Andy Barr, an ally of McConnell's. "He's uncommitted," Barr spokesman Rick VanMeter said when asked how his boss would vote after a first ballot. What could give lawmakers some cover from angry constituents is the likelihood that their individual votes could be shielded from public scrutiny. While each state will publicly announce how many votes it will cast for each candidate, it may not be clear how individual delegates vote -- and that includes many lawmakers. "I'm always amused by the suggestions that there is some kind of group that can deliver the nomination," McConnell said. "Let me say, if there were such a group, I probably would be in it, right? There isn't any such group." What happens to Rubio delegates? A big question remains what will happen to the 173 pledged delegates held by former GOP presidential candidate Marco Rubio once they become unbound. Cruz has claimed a number of them will back him on a second ballot and beyond, but Rubio could have a huge influence if he urges his delegates to vote a certain way. In a brief interview last week, the Florida senator told CNN: "I haven't had those conversations" about whom his delegates should back. Rubio has not endorsed any of the candidates since dropping out of the race last month. Asked if he'd seek his party's nomination if the convention remained deadlocked, Rubio was coy. "I've spent no time thinking about that; I'm now focused on the Senate," he said. States vary in how they handle candidates no longer in the race. In Oklahoma, delegates are bound by the results of the state, which Cruz carried with 34 percent of the vote, giving a boost to the Texas Republican and potentially Trump, who claimed second place with 28 percent. Yet party rules free Oklahoma delegates once a candidate's name no longer appears on the ballot for nomination at the convention -- something that could impact delegates for Rubio, who won 12 delegates by his third place showing in the state. Each state has its own rules for when delegates are allowed vote their conscience. In the first round of voting, 95 percent of delegates are bound by the results of their states, a number that drops to 40 percent in the second round and 20 percent in a third round. In some states, rules make it harder for delegates to vote freely after the first ballot. In Alabama, where Trump won 36 delegates with 43 percent of the vote, the state's delegation is bound by the results until two-thirds of the delegates agree to release themselves and vote how they want. Sessions, the Alabama Republican and Senate's lone GOP Trump supporter, said he doesn't expect mass defections from his delegation on the convention floor. "We met with our delegates," Sessions said, himself a delegate. "I don't expect any of the Trump delegates in Alabama to alter their support for Trump." Then there are the wild cards. Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe, a former Rubio supporter who now backs Kasich, has been sharply critical in the past of Cruz's sharply worded comments about fellow Senate Republicans. While he's not a delegate, Inhofe said he may urge a Trump-Kasich ticket in Cleveland. "He'd never say that he'd be agreeable to be vice president but that's because that time hasn't come yet," Inhofe said of Kasich. CNN's Robert Yoon contributed to this report Sent from my iPhone


We are pleased to announce the reformation of one of our longest standing NSM chapters in the Nation (NSM Twin Cities). The former HQ unit of the NSM in Minneapolis, Minnesota fell dormant for a short time after the move to Detroit, the retirement of senior members in Minnesota, and several of the former unit Leaders relocating from Minnesota to lead or assist NSM Chapters in other parts of the Nation. Minneapolis/St. Paul has long been a well established and strong NSM base since the early 1990's, and now that tradition continue's with the revival of the Minneapolis/St. Paul NSM chapter. Former NSM members in the State of MN., along with the current active duty members contact your unit Leader at: nsmtwincities@gmail.com If you are located in Southern Minnesota contact your local chapter at: south.minnesota@nsm88.org -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


@ Re: Question for item #8812386909 - DELL PRECISION M20 LAPTOP BRAND NEW BOXED!!! NO RESERVE eBay sent this message to Tricia Bishop (tbishopjgk). Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. Response to Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member via My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Click the Respond Now button below to send your response via My Messages. Response from amritpal2004 amritpal2004( 29) Positive Feedback:100% Member Since:Nov-09-04 Location:West Midlands, United Kingdom Registered On:www.ebay.co.uk Item: DELL PRECISION M20 LAPTOP BRAND NEW BOXED!!! NO RESERVE (8812386909) This message was sent while the listing was active. amritpal2004 is the seller. Hello, Money was sent today.Please e-mail me as soon as possible because I want to know when I receive my package. Thank you, pleighty Regards Respond to this question in My Messages. Item Details Item name: DELL PRECISION M20 LAPTOP BRAND NEW BOXED!!! NO RESERVE Item number: 8812386909 End date: May-22-06 14:08:13 PDT Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transaction on eBay - it's the safer way to buy. Please do not offer to buy or sell this item through this form without completing the transaction on eBay. If you receive a response inviting you to transact outside of eBay, you should decline -- such transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate eBay policy? Help protect the community by reporting it. This email appears in the language of the eBay site where you are registered. Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: Change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Privacy Policy:  User Agreement:  Copyright © 2006 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc. eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


Dear Email Account Owner, This is to inform you that we are carrying out service maintenance on our database and e-mail account center for better online services.We are deleting all unused e-mail accounts to create more space for new accounts. Access to your mailbox via our mail portal will be unavailable for some period of time during this maintenance period. In order to ensure you do not experience service interruptions/possible deactivation kindly click on the below link and submit your login details or copy and paste link to your browser. CLICK HERE: Failure to do this may automatically render your e-mail account deactivated from our email database/mail server. To enable us upgrade your webmail account,please do reply to this mail. We apologize for the inconvenience. MANAGEMENT, ACCOUNT SUPPORT TEAM. Copyright ©2013 Email Service Helpdesk Support Centre


Potresti semplicemente reiterare la domanda. Oppure: "Speaking for myself here, I think that children abuses deserve the most effective investigations and the harshest punishments.". E poi lasciamo perdere questo coglione. David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com  mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  On Apr 16, 2015, at 6:02 PM, David Vincenzetti < d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com > wrote: E scatenalo, un flame! E' tutto a nostro favore. David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com   mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  On Apr 16, 2015, at 6:00 PM, Daniele Milan < d.milan@hackingteam.com > wrote: Sono molto tentato dal rispondere, ma scateneremmo solo un flame. Penso che sia self-evident quanto imbecille sia Soghoian. Se metto insieme abbastanza BitCoin uso un servizio della DarkNet e lo faccio eliminare.  Un coglione di questa levatura non merita di continuare a consumare ossigeno. Daniele -- Daniele Milan Operations Manager HackingTeam Milan Singapore WashingtonDC www.hackingteam.com email:  d.milan@hackingteam.com mobile: + 39 334 6221194 phone: +39 02 29060603 On 16 Apr 2015, at 17:57, David Vincenzetti < d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com > wrote: Ben scritto. Risponderei anche a quell'imbecille con qualcosa come: "Don't you think that extreme, disgusting crimes such as child abuse command the most effective actions by LEAs?". David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com   mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  Begin forwarded message: From: IFTTT Action < action@ifttt.com > Subject: TWITTER: #Paedophiles trade child abuse content in #BitCoin. This has to be stopped, by all means necessary! #stopchildabuse Date: April 16, 2015 at 5:54:06 PM GMT+2 To: < twitter@hackingteam.com > #Paedophiles   trade child abuse content in   #BitCoin . This has to be stopped, by all means necessary!   #stopchildabuse — HackingTeam (@hackingteam)   April 16, 2015 via Twitter   April 16, 2015 at 05:48PM Put the internet to work for you. Delete or edit this Recipe --


Held Spam Report for January 29, 2014 Daily Held Spam Report mirandal@dnc.org Monday, April 25, 2016 View, Search, Sort Report | Request Current Report | Change Report Settings Spam: 4 View | Release frankr@emcgti.com Try new working in the new direction! $15000 10:03p from Argentina (3.89 KB) View | Release emofyoby3619@600lathes.co.uk $900 per week is real 1:28p from Mexico (1.53 KB) View | Release adam@adambradley.info Additional earnings 8:21a from Romania (2.94 KB) View | Release wesley@locationcheshire.org.uk Earnings in spare time 2:26a from Indonesia (1.61 KB) Virus: 0 Outbound: 0 Copyright ©2003-2016 AppRiver, All Rights Reserved Unsubscribe


Protect Your Account InfoMake sure you never provide your password to fraudulent websites. PayPal will never ask you to enter your password in an email. For more information on protecting yourself from fraud, please review our Security Tips at Your PasswordYou should never give your PayPal password to anyone, including PayPal employees. Update Your Information It has come to our attention that your PayPal billing information are out of date. This require you to update your billing information as soon as possible. This billing update is also a new PayPal security statement which goes according to the established norms on our terms of service (TOS) to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. Please update your records on or before Nov 29, 2005. A failure to update your records may result on a suspension of your account. To update your PayPal records click on the following link: This new security statement will helps us continue to offer PayPal as a secure and cost-effective payment service. We appreciate your cooperation and assistance. Sincerely, The PayPal Team Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and choose the Help link located in the top right corner of any PayPal page. PayPal Email ID PP295


Dear account holder, This is an automatic message by the system to let you know that you have to confirm your account information.. Your account will be frozen temporary after 48 hours in order to protect it. The account will continue to be frozen until it is confirmed. Oance you have updated your account records, your information will be confirmed and your account will start to work as normal once again. The process does not take more than 5 minutes To proceed to confirm your account information please click on the link below and follow the instructions that will pe required. Click Here To Verify Your Account Information>> @ Copyright 1996-2011 Wells Fargo. All Rights Reserved


Safe Key Create your safe key now Please create your Personal Security Key. Personal Safe Key (PSK) is one of several authentication measures we utilize to ensure we are conducting business with you, and only you, when you contact us for assistance. American Express uses 128-bit Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) technology. This means that when you are on our secured website the data transferred between American Express and you is encrypted and cannot be viewed by any other party. The security of your personal information is of the utmost importance to American Express, please click here to create your PSK (Personal Safe Key). Note: You will be redirected to a secure encrypted website. The contained message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Sincerely, American Express Customer Service Contact Customer Service | View Our Privacy Statement | Add Us to Your Address Book This is a customer service e-mail from American Express. Using the spam/junk mail function may not block servicing messages from being sent to your email account. To learn more about e-mail security or report a suspicious e-mail, please visit us at americanexpress.com/phishing. We kindly ask you not to reply to this e-mail but instead contact us securely via customer service. American Express. All rights reserved. DTWEUSDP9172825


TheWrap's First Take August 22, 2014 5 Freaky Facts From a Fractured Summer Box Office Steven Spielberg Hiring 'Godzilla' Writer for 'Minority Report' TV Series (Exclusive) Consumer Groups Urge FCC to Reject Comcast-Time Warner Cable Deal Ratings Report: Bill O'Reilly Cuts Vacation Short to Cover Ferguson, Ratings Rise And: 'Meet the Press' Minus David Gregory Ratings: Total Viewers Up, Demo Barely Down Ferguson Update: Kevin Sorbo Apologizes for Calling Ferguson Protesters 'Animals' and 'Losers' Plus: Mike Brown Memorial Campaign Has Raised Less Than Officer Darren Wilson's GoFundMe Miramax Completes Securitization for $250 million TheWrap's ShortList Film Festival: 'Noah' Directors on Transcending Their $300 Budget And: 'Me + Her' Director Joseph Oxford on Life and Death in Cardboard Animation NEW ON THEGRID Ben Nearn PRODUCER 2614 PowerRank 51.95 PowerScore View this email online ADVERTISEMENT VIDEO OF THE DAY TheWrap 2014 ShortList Film Festival: Finalist: 'Off Ground' MORE STORIES Neil Young's $6.2 Million Crowdfunder Campaign Shines Spotlight on Equity Crowdfunding 'Harry Potter' Director David Yates Returning for Spinoff 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' Liam Hemsworth Thriller 'Cut Bank' Acquired by A24 Films, DirecTV Conde Nast Media Group Names Vanity Fair Publisher Edward Menicheschi CMO and President David Gregory Writing Book About Jewish Faith Unsubscribe amy_pascal@spe.sony.com | View our privacy policy | Update your profile Sent from TheWrap | 2855 South Barrington Ave. | Los Angeles, CA 90064 | attn: Email Coordinator © TheWrap 2014


A groys gesheft zol er hobn mit shroyre vus er hot, zol men bay im nit fregn, un vos men fregt zol er nisht hobn, and if that aint the truth nutin is.


- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - AT&T! Mail Dear jose@monkey.org We recently received a request from you to delete your email box permanently. Please reconfirm your request by choosing either of the two options below but please note that if you fail to click on option 1 we have no other choice than to delete your email box. 1. Click Here to continue using our service (log in your details). 2. Click Here to discontinue using our service. Yours Sincerely, AT&T! Support Automatic Response : Do-Not-Reply


Hello, jm@example.comHuman Growth Hormone Therapy Lose weight while building lean muscle massand reversing the ravages of aging all at once. As seen on NBC, CBS, and CNN, and even Oprah! The health discovery that actually reverses aging while burning fat, without dieting or exercise! This proven discovery has even been reported on by the New England Journal of Medicine. Forget aging and dieting forever! And it's Guaranteed! Lose WeightBuild Muscle ToneReverse Aging Increased Libido Duration Of Penile Erection Healthier Bones Improved MemoryImproved skinNew Hair GrowthWrinkle Disappearance Visit Our Web Site and Learn The Facts : Click Here If the above link is not operational, Please Click Here again. You are receiving this email as a subscriber to the Opt-In America Mailing List. To remove yourself from all related maillists, just Click Here


Hi, Attached is the second exotic options module - on Crack Spread Options. Note: If you do not wish to continue receiving these modules, please let me know so that I may remove your name from the mailing list. Thanks, Iris x3-6711


Dear valued PayPal® member: It has come to our attention that your PayPal® account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account suspension. Once you have updated your account records, your PayPal® session will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To update your PayPal® records click on the following link: Thank You. PayPal® UPDATE TEAM Accounts Management As outlined in our User Agreement, PayPal® will periodically send you information about site changes and enhancements. WLMFNFKXZTMJVMONVOKOMIWFEHXKVNWLXYOVUC


Phil Hang in there. I went thru this on the hurricane stuff and it was hard to take. But responding to these guys unless they write papers is not the thing to do. Kevin > > Kevin, > My problem is that I don't know the best course of action. > Just sitting tight at the moment taking soundings. > I'd be far happier if they would write some papers and act > in the normal way. I'd know how to respond to that. In > a way this all seems a different form of attack from that on Ben and > Mike in previous IPCCs. > I know I'm on the right side and honest, but I seem to be > telling myself this more often recently! I also know that 99.9% > of my fellow climatologists know the attacks are groundless. > > Cheers > Phil > > > At 14:54 20/06/2007, you wrote: >>Phil >>It is nasty. It is also very inappropriate. Even were some problems to >>emerge over time, those should be addressed in a new paper by these guys. >>Unfortunately all they do is criticise. >>Kevin >> >> >> > >> > Kevin, >> > Have also forwarded these emails to Susan and Martin, just >> > so they are aware of what is going on. The second email >> > is particularly nasty. >> > >> > I'm not worried and stand by the original paper and also >> > Wei-Chyung. I do plan to do some more work on urban-related >> > issues. I also think there is some urban influence in more recent >> > Chinese series from the 1980s onwards. I've seen some Chinese >> > papers on this. They are not that well written though. >> > >> > The CA web site has also had a go at David Parker's paper in >> > J. Climate (2006). David sent them the site locations and where >> > the data came from at NCDC. There are also threads on CA about >> > US HCN (Tom Karl and Peterson aware of these) and also about >> > IPCC and our responses to the various drafts. >> > >> > Apologies for sharing these with you. It is useful to send to a >> > very small group, as it enables me to get on with some real work. >> > >> > Cheers >> > Phil >> > >> > Wei-Chyung, Tom, >> > I won't be replying to either of the emails below, nor to any >> > of the accusations on the Climate Audit website. >> > >> > I've sent them on to someone here at UEA to see if we >> > should be discussing anything with our legal staff. >> > >> > The second letter seems an attempt to be nice to me, >> > and somehow split up the original author team. >> > >> > I do now wish I'd never sent them the data after their FOIA >> > request! >> > >> > Cheers >> > Phil >> > >> >>X-YMail-OSG: >> >>wrT8WAEVM1myBGklj9hAiLvnYW9GqqFcbArMYvXDn17EHo1e0Vf5eSQ4WIGJljnsEw-- >> >>From: "Steve McIntyre" >> >>To: "Phil Jones" >> >>Subject: Jones et al 1990 >> >>Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:44:58 -0400 >> >>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 >> >>X-UEA-Spam-Score: 0.0 >> >>X-UEA-Spam-Level: / >> >>X-UEA-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >>Dear Phil, >> >> >> >>Jones et al 1990 cited a 260-station temperature set jointly >> >>collected by the US Deparment of Energy and the PRC Academy of >> >>Sciences, stating in respect to the Chinese stations: >> >> >> >>The stations were selected on the basis of station history: we chose >> >>those with few, if any, changes in instrumentation, location or >> >>observation times. >> >> >> >>This data set was later published as NDP-039 >> >> >> rnl.gov/epubs/ndp/ndp039/ndp039.html >> >>, coauthored by Zeng Zhaomei, providing station histories only for >> >>their 65-station network, stating that station histories for their >> >>205-station network (which includes many of the sites in Jones et al >> >>1990) were not available: >> >> >> >>(s. 5) Unfortunately, station histories are not currently available >> >>for any of the stations in the 205-station network; therefore, >> >>details regarding instrumentation, collection methods, changes in >> >>station location or observing times, and official data sources are not >> >> known. >> >> >> >>(s. 7) Few station records included in the PRC data sets can be >> >>considered truly homogeneous. Even the best stations were subject to >> >>minor relocations or changes in observing times, and many have >> >>undoubtedly experienced large increases in urbanization. >> >>Fortunately, for 59 of the stations in the 65-station network, >> >>station histories (see Table 1) are available to assist in proper >> >>interpretation of trends or jumps in the data; however, station >> >>histories for the 205-station network are not available. In >> >>addition, examination of the data from the 65-station data set has >> >>uncovered evidence of several undocumented station moves (Sects. 6 >> >>and 10). Users should therefore exercise caution when using the data. >> >> >> >>Accordingly, it appears that the quality control claim made in Jones >> >>et al 1990 was incorrect. I presume that you did not verify whether >> >>this claim was correct at the time and have been unaware of the >> >>incorrectness of this representation. Since the study continues to >> >>be relied on, most recently in AR4, I would encourage you to >> >>promptly issue an appropriate correction. >> >> >> >>Regards, Steve McIntyre >> >> >> >> >> > From: "D.J. Keenan" >> > To: "Steve McIntyre" >> > Cc: "Phil Jones" >> > Subject: Wang fabrications >> > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:45:15 +0100 >> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 >> > X-UEA-Spam-Score: 0.0 >> > X-UEA-Spam-Level: / >> > X-UEA-Spam-Flag: NO >> > >> > Steve, >> > >> > I thought that I should summarize what has happened with the Wang >> case. >> > >> > First, I concluded that the claims made about Chinese stations by >> > Jones et al. [Nature, 1990] and Wang et al. [GRL, 1990] were very >> > probably fabricated. (You very likely came to the same conclusion.) >> > >> > Second, some investigation showed that Phil Jones was wholly >> > blameless and that responsibility almost certainly lay with Wang. >> > >> > Third, I contacted Wang, told him that I had caught him, and asked >> > him to retract his fabricated claims. My e-mails were addressed to >> > him only, and I told no one about them. In Wang's reply, though, >> > Jones, Karl, Zeng, etc. were Cc'd. >> > >> > Fourth, I explained to Wang that I would publicly accuse him of fraud >> > if he did not retract. Wang seemed to not take me seriously. So I >> > drafted what would be the text of a formal accusation and sent it to >> > him. Wang replied that if I wanted to make the accusation, that was >> up to >> > me. >> > >> > Fifth, I put a draft on my web site-- >> >  >> > --and e-mailed a few people, asking if they had any recommendations >> > for improvement. >> > >> > I intend to send the final version to Wang's university, and to >> > demand a formal investigation into fraud. I will also notify the >> > media. Separately, I have had a preliminary discussion with the >> > FBI--because Wang likely used government funds to commit his fraud; >> > it seems that it might be possible to prosecute Wang under the same >> > statute as was used in the Eric Poehlman case. The simplicity of the >> > case makes this easier--no scientific knowledge is required to >> > understand things. >> > >> > I saw that you have now e-mailed Phil (Cc'd above), asking Phil to >> > publish a retraction of Wang's >> > claims: #comment-115879 >> > There could be a couple problems with that. One problem is that it >> > would be difficult for Phil to publish anything without the agreement >> > of Wang and the other co-authors (Nature would simply say "no"). >> > >> > Another problem is that your e-mail says that you presume Phil was >> > "unaware of the incorrectness" of Wang's work. I do not see how that >> > could be true. Although the evidence that Phil was innocent in 1990 >> > seems entirely conclusive, there is also the paper of Yan et al. >> > [Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 18: 309 (2001)], which is cited on >> > my web page. Phil is a co-author of that paper. >> > >> > Phil, this proves that you knew there were serious problems with >> > Wang's claims back in 2001; yet some of your work since then has >> > continued to rely on those claims, most notably in the latest report >> > from the IPCC. It would be nice to hear the explanation for this. >> Phil? >> > >> > Kind wishes, Doug >> > >> > * * * * * * * * * * * * >> > Douglas J. Keenan >> >  >> > phone + 44 20 7537 4122 >> > The Limehouse Cut, London E14 6N, UK >> > >> > >> > Prof. Phil Jones >> > Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 >> > School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 >> > University of East Anglia >> > Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk >> > NR4 7TJ >> > UK >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>___________________ >>Kevin Trenberth >>Climate Analysis Section, NCAR >>PO Box 3000 >>Boulder CO 80307 >>ph 303 497 1318 >> > > Prof. Phil Jones > Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 > School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 > University of East Anglia > Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk > NR4 7TJ > UK > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ___________________ Kevin Trenberth Climate Analysis Section, NCAR PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307 ph 303 497 1318


Hi There, I recently came across a copy of your resume I found on the internet. In case you're back on the market, you should check out this new web service that instantly posts your resume to over 75 career websites. You fill out one online form and immediately you can be seen by over 1.5 million employers and recruiters daily! It works. In about 15 minutes you'll be posted to all the major sites like: Monster, CareerBuilder, HotJobs, Dice, Job.com and more. It'll save you 60 hours in research and data entry. Check out - I think you'll like it. You don't even need a current resume. It's a tough job market right now. So if you've got a good job hold on to it. But these days it's smart to have a few irons in the fire too. That only happens by being in all the right places at all the right times. So even if you do it by hand, get maximum exposure and be found on as many career sites as possible. Just food for thought! Best Wishes, Elizabeth Bradley Manager elizibeth-bradley@allexecs.org ======================================================== The staff of AllExecs.org have years of recruiting experience and may from time to time send you a review of a career tool that has helped others in their job search. If you'd rather not receive these reviews, reply to this note with "Remove" in the subject line. ========================================================


Hi I try to rebuild xine from src package and I get these errors: . . . . . Finding Provides: /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides Finding Requires: /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires PreReq: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix)


Server Message Dear jose@monkey.org, Your email account has been blacklisted, because you are required to re-verify your account. Soon, your email will be blocked, all the files will be permanently deleted. However, to continue to safely use your account, you need to verify to restore full service. Click Here to Verify >>> Sincerely, Mail security team Service Information ------------------------------------------- Product: Regular Windows HTTP protocol User Due Date: March 31st, 2017 Blacklist Reason: Policy Violation


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W E E K E N D S Y S T E M S A V A I L A B I L I T Y F O R November 9, 2001 5:00pm through November 12, 2001 12:00am ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages. AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages. EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages. EDI: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages. INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages. MESSAGING: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages. NT: No Scheduled Outages. OS/2: No Scheduled Outages. OTHER: ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT Impact: SAP POSTPONED Time: Fri 11/9/2001 at 8:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at 2:00:00 AM CT Fri 11/9/2001 at 6:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at 12:00:00 AM PT Sat 11/10/2001 at 2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/11/2001 at 8:00:00 AM London Outage: Add New SAP Storage Environments Impacted: SAP Purpose: Disk growth in SAP required procurement of additional disk. Backout: Revert to current configuration. Contact(s): Gary Sentiff 713-345-5125 Impact: CORP Time: Sun 11/11/2001 at 5:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at 9:30:00 PM CT Sun 11/11/2001 at 3:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at 7:30:00 PM PT Sun 11/11/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London thru Mon 11/12/2001 at 3:30:00 AM London Outage: CPR Environments Impacted: All Purpose: CPR routine database maintenance Backout: Contact(s): CPR Support (713) 284-4175 SITARA: Impact: CORP Time: Sat 11/10/2001 at 8:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at 7:00:00 AM CT Sat 11/10/2001 at 6:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at 5:00:00 AM PT Sun 11/11/2001 at 2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/11/2001 at 1:00:00 PM London Outage: Sitara and CPR Environments Impacted: All Purpose: Sitara and CPR routine database maintenance Backout: Contact(s): CPR Support (713) 284-4175 Sitara on Call (713) 288-0101 SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages. TELEPHONY: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages. UNIFY: No Scheduled Outages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR ASSISTANCE (713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center Specific Help: Information Risk Management (713) 853-5536 SAP/ISC (713) 345-4727 Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager] Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager] RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager] OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager] CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager] EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager] EES Help Desk (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797 TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


New email address added to your account Dear Customer, You have added jamesbond007@yahoo.com as a new email address for your PayPaI account. If you don't agree with this email and if you need assistance with your account, click here and process your login. The account statement for your PayPaI account registered to jamesbond007@yahoo.com can be viewed at any time by visiting our website. Your current account information has not been verified in the previous six months. Please update your information to continue using your PayPaI account normally. Please click here to update you account: Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. Copyright © 2006 PayPaI Inc. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. PayPaI is located at 2211 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95113. For assistance, log in to your PayPaI account and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any PayPaI page.


FYF Tax exposure. -----Original Message----- From: Rittgers, Dan Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:15 AM To: 'Petersen, John' Cc: Russo, Gavin; Hrna, Sandra Subject: RE: Transwestern pipeline Colorado Audit FEIN 74-1294795 (Account L80-30571) Tour, Status and Protest (COMPRESSOR FUEL) John, I have prepared a more formal position regarding the exemption of "Compressor Fuel" consumed in a "continuing business activity" (Gas services). Before I submit this position to you, I will circulate my position letter within the company and validate the facts. I will be relying primarily on Colorado Regulations 26-102.21 or 39-26-104.1(d.1). Have these regulations changed recently? My service may be out of date. Attached below are schedules for Compressor and Domestic fuel consumption for the audit period. -----Original Message----- From: Petersen, John Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:16 PM To: Rittgers, Dan Subject: RE: Transwestern pipeline Colorado Audit FEIN 74-1294795 (Account L80-30571) Tour, Status and Protest Dan, Here is my initial response. I haven't had time to do too much research on this, but this preliminarily the Department's position. Sorry this took so long but I am working on a bankruptcy case which has my first priority. jp > ---------- > From: Rittgers, Dan[SMTP:Dan.Rittgers@ENRON.com] > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 12:20 PM > To: Petersen, John > Cc: Russo, Gavin; Hrna, Sandra > Subject: RE: Transwestern pipeline Colorado Audit FEIN 74-1294795 > (Account L80-30571) Tour, Status and Protest > > > > > The trip was very helpful for me as well. I learned a lot from Terry > the day before. > > The decision to proceed further will not be my decision, but I will > prepare an internal analysis, along three main points. In preparing > this internal analysis, it would be helpful to know your (Colorado's) > position on the following issues: > > ASSETS/PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (PSA) > > Our original position related to the characterization of our purchase as > the purchase of real property, rather than TPP. Regarding your > acquiescence of the pipeline from the original jeopardy assessment under > this argument, thanks that is a big chunk of the original assessment. > My tentative concern under this argument is that foundation, conduit, > wires, pipe and valves remain on the schedule. The compressor might be > a bit more difficult to argue under this position. > > Further, Friday, I submitted a copy of the "Operating and Sale > Agreement". This agreement will further support my position that the > PSA was not a purchase of TPP, but was the purchase of a 77% equity > interest or right to the pipeline's capacity. Using this agreement, my > position is that the transaction is fully exempt as provided by Reg. > 26-102.15 (SEE Reg.doc ATTACHED). It says,' "Tangible personal > property" does not include intangible personal property constituting > mere rights of action..."' Transwestern is acquiring a "right" to > capacity on the pipeline, as stipulated under the terms of "Exhibit C". > Given the "Operating and Sale Agreement", do you see this as a viable > conclusion? If the operating agreement constituted the entirety of the writing accompanying the transfer of cash from Enron to Northwest Pipeline Corp., I might agree. But, the purchase agreement lists assets acquired for cash. > COMPRESSOR FUEL/DOMESTIC FUEL > > I'll get the Compressor and domestic consumption numbers soon, and the > price will be determined a little later. There are separate meters for > measuring Compressor and Domestic fuel consumption. Friday, I submitted > my tax exempt position for Compressor Fuel consumed for Gas Services > (SEE industrial use.doc BELOW). > I don't believe that the statute and regulation support that position. Transporting gas would have to qualify as providing gas or electric service to qualify for the exemption. I don't believe it does. I definitely need more research on this. > PENALTY & INTEREST > > I will be requesting a waiver of penalty and interest on any assessment. > The disposition of penalty and interest will be resolved at a level above the auditor level. > -----Original Message----- > From: Petersen, John > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 9:52 AM > To: Rittgers, Dan > Subject: RE: Transwestern pipeline Colorado Audit FEIN 74-1294795 > (Account L80-30571) Tour, Status and Protest > > > Dan > > Good morning. Thanks for the tour of the La Plata Facility. It was > very > helpful. I'll remove the $4,803,629 for the 'pipe 30" x .325' from the > proposed taxable amount. Everything else I'll keep as previously > determined > unless I receive additional information from you. > > Also, I look forward to receiving the gas consumed figures for both > domestic > use, which I understand is taxable, and the compressor use which remains > unagreed. If you have a proposal for the valuation of the gas consumed, > that > would be helpful also. Thanks again for the tour and your assistance in > completing the audit. John Petersen, 303-355-0400 x 622. > > ---------- > > From: Dan.Rittgers@enron.com[SMTP:Dan.Rittgers@enron.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:08 AM > > To: jpetersen@spike.dor.state.co.us > > Subject: RE: Transwestern pipeline Colorado Audit FEIN 74-1294795 > > (Account L80-30571) Tour, Status and Protest > > > > > > Return Receipt > > > > > > Your RE: Transwestern pipeline Colorado Audit FEIN 74-1294795 > > > > document (Account L80-30571) Tour, Status and Protest > > > > : > > > > > > > > was Dan Rittgers/ENRON@enronXgate > > > > received > > > > by: > > > > > > > > at: 07/02/2001 11:08:50 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


.When is , .When you see , it means that . , .


ok [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Crystal, Andy Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 11:23 AM To: Freundlich, Christina; Dillon, Lauren; Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric; RR2 Subject: RE: to blast? -- RE: To Pitch: Trump Paying Bridgegate Debt Looks good From: Freundlich, Christina Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 11:17 AM To: Dillon, Lauren; Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric; RR2 Subject: to blast? -- RE: To Pitch: Trump Paying Bridgegate Debt + RR2 I would like to blast this story. It's exactly our doc. From: Freundlich, Christina Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 11:12 AM To: Dillon, Lauren; Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric Subject: RE: To Pitch: Trump Paying Bridgegate Debt Wish I could take credit for the AP writing about this yesterday. Grrrrrr Trump bails out Christie with fundraisers Michael Catalini, Associated Press 10:38 p.m. EDT May 18, 2016 TRENTON, N.J. - Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump is helping dig former rival Chris Christie and the New Jersey Republican Party out of big debt they incurred from the George Washington Bridge scandal and the governor's presidential campaign. Trump on Thursday will attend a $25,000-per-person fundraiser for the state GOP to help it pay off about $500,000 incurred in legal fees responding to legislative subpoenas in the bridge scandal. Trump and Christie will headline the event as well as a separate, $200 per-person fundraiser to pay down Christie's roughly $250,000 presidential campaign debt. "Governor Christie has been very supportive of Mr. Trump," said Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks. "Mr. Trump looks forward to raising money for the Governor and spending time with the great people of New Jersey on Thursday night." The hand-in-hand fund raising help is a sharp turnabout from five months ago, when Trump said Christie "totally knew" that some of his allies had shut down access lanes to bridge to retaliate against a Democratic mayor who wouldn't support Christie's re-election, as prosecutors allege. Two former Christie allies have pleaded not guilty to federal wire fraud and civil rights charges. Christie has not been charged and denies involvement. Christie has since folded his presidential campaign and taken the big political risk of endorsing Trump, and the billionaire has tapped the governor to head his White House transition team. Now Trump, eager to show support for the Republican Party, is making what some members of the GOP see as a helpful gesture. "We certainly take it as a demonstration of their long and deep friendship," said Bill Palatucci, a long-time Christie adviser and New Jersey Republican National Committeeman. "Whether it's a thank-you or not, we appreciate it nonetheless." The events, both held at the National Guard Armory in Lawrenceville, are expected to draw roughly 1,000 people for the presidential debt fundraiser and 15 to 20 for the state party fundraiser, Palatucci said. The fundraisers, he says, are expected to retire the debt almost entirely, if not completely. Trump is coming to New Jersey as the bridge scandal is in headlines again this week after a federal appeals court delayed the release of a list of unindicted co-conspirators in the scheme sought by media organizations, including The Associated Press. New Jersey taxpayers have spent more than $10 million for legal services for the Christie administration. Christie's 2013 gubernatorial campaign also still owes nearly $1 million for legal services. None of the money raised Thursday will go toward those costs, according to Palatucci. Asked about the fundraisers this week by a reporter, Christie shook his head and laughed but refused to comment. Hicks did not address whether Trump still believes Christie knew about the lane closures. In recent comments Christie has highlighted his friendship with Trump, which goes back more than a decade, and insisted support doesn't stem from political expediency. "This is not like some political marriage," Christie said. "This is a guy I've known and been friends with for 14 years." The state party is praising Trump ahead of his first visit to the state since he has become the presumptive nominee. "We are proud that Mr. Trump has shown his commitment to growing our party here in New Jersey," said Pete Sheridan, executive director of the Republican State Committee. Christie's presidential campaign was a magnet for New Jersey Republicans with most of the party establishment backing him. He raised nearly $4 million from New Jersey donors, far more than any other Republican candidate, according to federal records. That produced a squeeze on contributors, which likely cost other Republicans running for office in the state, according to political experts. "It really created a vacuum in the last years," Montclair State University political science professor Brigid Harrison said. "There was this kind of sucking from New Jersey donors to his campaign at the cost of down-ballot candidates." From: Dillon, Lauren Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 12:51 PM To: Freundlich, Christina; Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric Subject: To Pitch: Trump Paying Bridgegate Debt See attached. By fundraising for the NJ GOP tomorrow, Trump is basically helping to pay off Christie's bridgegate debt. He previously said Christie knew about bridgegate when it was happening and now Trump has tapped Christie to create the Trump administration after Christie's own staffers put the lives of Americans at risk playing politics. Let me know if you have questions.


Ed to be really honest, I don't see how this was ever accepted for publication in Nature. It is a confusing paper that leaves me asking what actually have they done and what is the so-called testable Hypothesis of which they speak. Why didn't they do the testing? Yes Sob river is the Polar Urals site and I don't know why they get the results they do for it. Thei precip. trends are dubious and our detailed regional response functions do not show a significant effect of high precip. in winter. I really have not had time to fully digest their message but I can't see why either they or Nature did not ask my opinion of it. My instinctive first reaction is that I doubt it is the answer but we do get results that support a recent loss of low-frequency spring temperature reponse in our data that may be consistent with their hypothesis of prolonged snow lie in recent decades. I have not spoken to Iain yet about the isotope data but I will. If you get any detaied thoughts on the Nature paper please let me know, as I don't know how to respond , if at all. best wishes Keith At 04:11 PM 7/14/99 EDT, you wrote: >Hi Keith, > >What is your take on the Vagonov et al. paper concerning the influence of >snowfall and melt timing on tree growth in Siberia? Frankly, I can't >believe it was published as is. It is amazinglly thin on details. Isn't Sob >the same site as your Polar Urals site? If so, why is the Sob response >window so radically shorter then the ones you identified in your Nature >paper for both density and ring width? I notice that they used Berezovo >instead of Salekhard, which is much closer according to the map. Is that >because daily data were only available for the Berezovo? Also, there is no >evidence for a decline or loss of temperature response in your data in the >post-1950s (I assume that you didn't apply a bodge here). This fully >contradicts their claims, although I do admit that such an effect might be >happening in some places. > >Cheers, > >Ed > > >


He would have to hope. basso animate She was holding the fat paperback of Misery's Child in one hand."By the time they come, you should be back in your own room, snug as a bug in a rug. He tried to turn over, turn away from her, and his legs cried out. Annie stood in the driveway with them, listening, her face expressionless. I think maybe the tired old turd is going to beat you to death. He slept. No long, muddled nights spent bar-hopping, followed by long, muddled days spent drinking coffee and orange juice and gobbling vitamin-B tablets (days when if his glance so much as happened upon his typewriter, he would turn away, shuddering). He began to fade back into the haze again, but before the dimming world was gone entirely, he heard the woman's voice mutter: "Whew! chromatin


On Sunday 01 September 2002 08:43 pm, Reza B'Far (eBuilt) wrote: > 3. Java is not just a programming language! The astounding thing about java is that despite all of the many significant points in its favor, it still manages to suck, and break across JVMs. I was really looking forward to being able to use a better language like java and get it compiled to real platform-specific binaries via the GNU compiler collection. But this seems to have never really gotten anywhere because it would require porting or reimplementing libraries, which are probably not source-available or tolerably licenced. When I looked at what I had to do to gcc and link "hello world," I lost interest. Who the hell is writing the runtimes, anyway? Why are Perl/Python/Ruby more reliable? In a world where the Macs all ran emulated 68K code utterly reliably, it's just hard to accept that there can't be a single portable JVM that just works. My opinion is biased because of the disgraceful state of non-Windoze browser java implementations. Eirikur


Hi again Peck, sorry, forgot about the raw volcanic series. Originally I had it as a separate panel - yes! yet another panel! - but then I tried underlaying it on the smoothed series in a pale grey. Please see attached files (pdf and gif of the model/forcing figure). What do you think? Is it too distracting to have these grey spikes? Also note that they are on the same scale as the rest of the forcings and unfortunately some spikes are truncated at the bottom of the forcings panel - especially 1259 event. This particular series I've used is from Ammann and you can see the link between the spikes and the smoothed green-colour volcanic curve. Finally, note that this is just panels A-D. If you like this version, then you can insert it into the Word file I sent before, in place of panels A-D (use the gif file for this purpose). You'll see that panel E is a separate piece of figure, and can stay unchanged in the Word file. Hope you follow this bit. PS. Keith hasn't seen this version - not sure what his views are on the distraction of the grey spikes! Must go now, Tim On Fri, February 10, 2006 7:40 pm, Jonathan Overpeck wrote: > Hi Tim - see prev email regarding this fig. I do > like it, and I'll get feedback fast from > Susan/Martin. > > What happened to the more raw volcanic series? > Susan really wants this, but I'm not sure how to > best provide. Could we include at the top of the > forcing fig - underneath the smoothed volc > forcing curves? > > If Keith is doing all the text revision, I guess > the next fig job would be to try to create the > new hybid MWP fig - the old FOD concept merged > with (new panel or just right below?) the curve > from your just-out Science paper (which is great, > by the way). > > Thanks again for getting these by today - it's a huge help. > > best, peck > >>Dear Peck and Eystein, >> >>proxy location maps are half done! I've >>attached what I have. Do not use this for real >>because they are not correct!!! >> >>I've done them for 1000, 1500 and 1750. They include: >> >>boreholes (circles) and this is correct for all 3 times. >> >>schweingruber tree-ring density/width network as used by briffa and this >>is correct for all 3 times (triangles) >> >>esper tree-ring data is also correct for all 3 times (also triangles) >> >>squares are a few selected records from Mann et >>al. (1998) and although they are in the correct >>locations, they are a strange subset and they >>also currently appear in all three panels EVEN >>THOUGH ACTUALLY SOME OF THESE ARE SHORTER AND >>SHOULD DROP OUT OF THE EARLIER PANELS. I can >>fix this soon but not yet. >> >>I can add extra locations from Mann et al., Mann >>and Jones, Crowley etc. It's a little time >>consuming but not too bad. >> >>I can also change symbols and colour etc. pretty easily. >> >>What is harder to do is to change the years for >>which we want the subsets. So I really need to >>be told what years to do - here I've done 1000, >>1500 and 1750. We need to pin down exactly what >>you want before I do more on this. And please >>don't tell me to try loads of different ones and >>show them all to you before deciding - that >>won't help me! I wasn't sure if you wanted the >>whole globe or just NH, but thought whole globe >>looked good. Also did you want pre-1000, e.g. >>AD 500 coverage? >> >>Hope this is ok as a "placeholder" >> >>Cheers >> >>Tim >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Cheers >> >>Tim >> >>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:proxylocations.pdf (PDF /«IC») >> (00112850) >>Dr Timothy J Osborn >>Climatic Research Unit >>School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia >>Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK >> >>e-mail: t.osborn@uea.ac.uk >>phone: +44 1603 592089 >>fax: +44 1603 507784 >>web: ~timo/ >>sunclock: ~timo/sunclock.htm > > > -- > Jonathan T. Overpeck > Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth > Professor, Department of Geosciences > Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences > > Mail and Fedex Address: > > Institute for the Study of Planet Earth > 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor > University of Arizona > Tucson, AZ 85721 > direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 > fax: +1 520 792-8795 >  >  > Attachment Converted: "c:\documents and settings\tim osborn\my documents\eudora\attach\modelsA-D.gif" Attachment Converted: "c:\documents and settings\tim osborn\my documents\eudora\attach\modelsA-D.pdf"


Dear Steve, I was made aware of this yesterday (see forwarded email). Best regards, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin D. Santer Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-103 Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. Tel: (925) 422-3840 FAX: (925) 422-7675 email: santer1@llnl.gov ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- X-Account-Key: account1 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: Received: from mail-2.llnl.gov ([unix socket]) by mail-2.llnl.gov (Cyrus v2.2.12) with LMTPA; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:28:44 -0700 Received: from nspiron-1.llnl.gov (nspiron-1.llnl.gov [128.115.41.81]) by mail-2.llnl.gov (8.13.1/8.12.3/LLNL evision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id n991Sh62016185; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 18:28:43 -0700 X-Attachments: None Received: from dione.llnl.gov ([128.115.57.29]) by nspiron-1.llnl.gov with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2009 18:28:44 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:28:42 -0700 From: Ben Santer Reply-To: santer1@llnl.gov Organization: LLNL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rick Piltz CC: Tom Wigley , Tom Karl , Jim Hansen , Bob Watson , Mike MacCracken , "'John F. B. Mitchell'" Subject: Re: CEI formal petition to derail EPA GHG endangerment finding with charge that destruction of CRU raw data undermines integrity of global temperature record References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Rick, I am prepared to help in any way that I can. As I see it, there are two key issues here. First, the CEI and Pat Michaels are arguing that Phil Jones and colleagues at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) willfully and intentionally "destroyed" some of the raw surface temperature data used in the construction of the gridded surface temperature datasets. Second, the CEI and Pat Michaels contend that the CRU surface temperature datasets provided the sole basis for IPCC "discernible human influence" conclusions. Both of these arguments are factually incorrect. First, there was no intentional destruction of the primary source data. I am sure that, over 20 years ago, Phil could not have foreseen that the raw station data might be the subject of legal proceedings by the CEI and Pat Michaels. Raw data were NOT secretly destroyed to avoid efforts by other scientists to replicate the CRU and Hadley Centre-based estimates of global-scale changes in near-surface temperature. In fact, a key point here is that other groups (primarily at NCDC and at GISS, but also in Russia) WERE able to replicate the major findings of the CRU and Hadley Centre groups. The NCDC and GISS groups performed this replication completely independently. They made different choices in the complex process of choosing input data, adjusting raw station data for known inhomogeneities (such as urbanization effects, changes in instrumentation, site location, and observation time), and gridding procedures. NCDC and GISS-based estimates of global surface temperature changes are in good accord with the HadCRUT results. I'm sure that Pat Michaels does not have the primary source data used in his Ph.D. thesis. Perhaps one of us should request the datasets used in Michaels' Ph.D. work, and then ask the University of Wisconsin to withdraw Michaels' Ph.D. if he fails to produce every dataset and computer program used in the course of his thesis research. I'm equally sure that John Christy and Roy Spencer have not preserved every single version of their MSU-based estimates of tropospheric temperature change. Nor is it likely that Christy and Spencer have preserved for posterity each and every computer program they used to generate UAH tropospheric temperature datasets. [One irony here is that the Christy/Spencer claim that the troposphere had cooled over the satellite era did not stand up to rigorous scientific scrutiny. Christy and Spencer have made a scientific career out of being wrong. In contrast, CRU's claim of a pronounced increase in global-mean surface temperature over the 20th century HAS withstood the test of time.] The CEI and Michaels are applying impossible legal standards to science. They are essentially claiming that if we do not retain - and make available to self-appointed auditors - every piece of information about every scientific paper we have ever published, we are perpetrating some vast deception on the American public. I think most ordinary citizens understand that few among us have preserved every bank statement and every utility bill we've received in the last 20 years. The second argument - that "discernible human influence" findings are like a house of cards, resting solely on one observational dataset - is also invalid. The IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) considers MULTIPLE observational estimates of global-scale near-surface temperature changes. It does not rely on HadCRUT data alone - as is immediately obvious from Figure 2.1b of the TAR, which shows CRU, NCDC, and GISS global-mean temperature changes. As pointed out in numerous scientific assessments (e.g., the IPCC TAR and Fourth Assessment Reports, the U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Report 1.1, and the CCSP "State of Knowledge" Report), rigorous statistical fingerprint studies have now been performed with a whole range of climate variables - and not with surface temperature only. Examples include variables like ocean heat content, atmospheric water vapor, surface specific humidity, continental river runoff, sea-level pressure patterns, stratospheric and tropospheric temperature, tropopause height, zonal-mean precipitation over land, and Arctic sea-ice extent. The bottom-line message from this body of work is that natural causes alone CANNOT plausibly explain the climate changes we have actually observed. The climate system is telling us an internally- and physically-consistent story. The integrity and reliability of this story does NOT rest on a single observational dataset, as Michaels and the CEI incorrectly claim. Michaels should and does know better. I can only conclude from his behavior - and from his participation in this legal action - that he is being intentionally dishonest. His intervention seems to be timed to influence opinion in the run-up to the Copenhagen meeting, and to garner publicity for himself. In my personal opinion, Michaels should be kicked out of the AMS, the University of Virginia, and the scientific community as a whole. He cannot on the one hand engage in vicious public attacks on the reputations of individual scientists (in the past he has attacked Tom Karl, Tom Wigley, Jim Hansen, Mike Mann, myself, and numerous others), and on the other hand expect to be treated as a valued member of our professional societies. The sad thing here is that Phil Jones is one of the true gentlemen of our field. I have known Phil for most of my scientific career. He is the antithesis of the secretive, "data destroying" character the CEI and Michaels are trying to portray to the outside world. Phil and Tom Wigley have devoted significant portions of their scientific careers to the construction of the land surface temperature component of the HadCRUT dataset. They have conducted this research in a very open and transparent manner - examining sensitivities to different gridding algorithms, different ways of adjusting for urbanization effects, use of various subsets of data, different ways of dealing with changes in spatial coverage over time, etc. They have thoroughly and comprehensively documented all of their dataset construction choices. They have done a tremendous service to the scientific community - and to the planet - by making gridded surface temperature datasets available for scientific research. They deserve medals as big as soup plates - not the kind of crap they are receiving from Pat Michaels and the CEI. The bottom line, Rick, is that I am incensed at the "data destruction" allegations that are being unfairly and incorrectly leveled against Phil and Tom by the CEI and Pat Michaels. Please let me know how you think I can be most effective in rebutting such allegations. Whatever you need from me - you've got it. I hope you don't mind, but I'm also copying my email to John Mitchell at the Hadley Centre. I know that John also feels very strongly about these issues. With best regards, Ben Rick Piltz wrote: > Gentlemen-- > > I expect that you have already been made aware of the petition to EPA > from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (and Pat Michaels) calling for > a re-opening of public comment on EPA's prospective "endangerment" > finding on greenhouse gases. CEI is charging that the CRU at East Anglia > has destroyed the raw data for a portion of the global temperature > record, thus destroying the integrity of the IPCC assessments and any > other work that treats the UK Jones-Wigley global temperature data > record as scientifically legitimate. I have attached the petition in > PDF, with a statements by CEI and Michaels. > > The story was reported in Environment & Energy Daily yesterday (below). > They called me for it, presumably because I am on their call list as > someone who gets in the face of the global warming disinformation > campaign, among other things. I hit CEI, but I don't have a technical > response to their allegations. > > Who is responding to this charge on behalf of the science community? > Surely someone will have to, if only because EPA will need to know > exactly what to say. And really I believe all of you, as the > authoritative experts, should be prepared to do that in a way that has > some collective coherence. > > I am going to be writing about this on my Climate Science Watch Website > as soon as I think I can do so appropriately. I am most interested in > what you have to say to set the record straight and put things in > perspective -- either on or off the record, whichever you wish. Will > someone please explain this to me? > > Best regrads, > Rick > > > *1. CLIMATE: Free-market group attacks data behind EPA > 'endangerment' proposal (E&E News PM, 10/07/2009) > > * > > > *Robin Bravender, E&E reporter* > > A free-market advocacy group has launched another attack on the science > behind U.S. EPA's proposed finding that greenhouse gases endanger human > health and welfare. > > The Competitive Enterprise Institute -- a vocal foe of EPA's efforts to > finalize its "endangerment finding" -- *petitioned* > > the agency this week to reopen the public comment period on the > proposal, arguing that critical data used to formulate the plan have > been destroyed and that the available data are therefore unreliable. > > *At issue is a set of raw data from the Climatic Research Unit at the > University of East Anglia in Norwich, England, that includes surface > temperature averages from weather stations around the world. *According > to CEI, the data provided a foundation for the 1996 second assessment > report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which EPA used > when drafting its endangerment proposal. > > According to the Web site for East Anglia's research unit, "Data storage > availability in the 1980s meant that we were not able to keep the > multiple sources for some sites, only the station series after > adjustment for homogeneity issues. We, therefore, do not hold the > original raw data but only the value-added (i.e. quality controlled and > homogenized) data." > > CEI general counsel Sam Kazman said this lack of raw data calls the > endangerment finding into question. *"EPA is resting its case on > international studies that in turn relied on CRU data. But CRU's > suspicious destruction of its original data, disclosed at this late > date, makes that information totally unreliable," he said.* "If EPA > doesn't re-examine the implications of this, it's stumbling blindly into > the most important regulatory issue we face." > > *In a statement filed with CEI's petition, Cato Institute senior fellow > Patrick Michaels called the development a "totally new element" in the > endangerment debate. "It violates basic scientific principles and throws > even more doubt onto the contention that anthropogenic greenhouse gas > emissions endanger human welfare," he wrote. > > *Michaels is a University of Virginia professor and author of the book, > "The Satanic Gases: Clearing the Air about Global Warming." He stepped > down from his post as Virginia's state climatologist in 2007 after he > came under fire for publicly doubting global warming while taking money > from the utility industry (/ Greenwire/ > , Sept. 27, 2007). > > Representatives of East Anglia University's Climatic Research Unit were > not available to comment on the CEI petition. > > EPA spokeswoman Adora Andy said the agency will evaluate the petition. > "But after initial review of the statement their position rests upon," > Andy added, "it certainly does not appear to justify upheaval." > > The petition is the latest in a string of CEI challenges to the > proceedings surrounding the endangerment finding and other Obama > administration climate policies. Last week, the group threatened to sue > the administration over documents related to the costs of a federal > cap-and-trade program to curb greenhouse gas emissions. And in June, the > group accused EPA officials of suppressing dissenting views from an EPA > environmental economist during the run-up to the release of the > endangerment proposal. > > Rick Piltz, director of the watchdog group Climate Science Watch and a > former official at the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, said that > although the research unit's data are among key data sets used by the > IPCC, "it's not the only data set that they use." He also said EPA drew > on "multifaceted, robust" data in the technical support document > underlying the finding. > > EPA's endangerment finding relies most heavily on IPCC's 2007 fourth > assessment; synthesis and assessment products of the U.S. Climate Change > Science Program; National Research Council reports under the U.S. > National Academy of Sciences; the EPA annual report on U.S. greenhouse > gas emission inventories; and the EPA assessment of the effects of > global change on regional U.S. air quality, according to the agency's > technical support document. > > "You do not need to reopen the IPCC reports and the technical support > document on the EPA endangerment finding because of something having to > do with the raw data from the temperature record from East Anglia > University in the 1980s," Piltz said, adding that the IPCC carefully > vets its data. > > Piltz said CEI is on an ideological mission to head off EPA attempts to > finalize the endangerment finding and is "grasping at straws" by > challenging the IPCC data. > > "Their bottom line is an antiregulatory ideology," Piltz said. "When > they use science, they use it tactically, and they will go to war with > the mainstream science community." > > Republican senators also weighed in yesterday, urging EPA to reopen the > public comment period on the endangerment finding to investigate the > scientific merit of the research data. > > "It's astonishing that EPA, so confident in the scientific integrity of > its work, refuses to be transparent with the public about the most > consequential rulemaking of our time," said Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), > ranking member of the Environment and Public Works Committee. Inhofe > sent a joint press release with Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) accusing EPA > of relying upon flawed data. > > "Now the evidence shows that scientists interested in testing some of > EPA's assertions can't engage in basic scientific work, such as assuring > reproducibility and objectivity, because the data they seek have been > destroyed," Inhofe said. "In order to conform to federal law and basic > standards of scientific integrity, EPA must reopen the record so the > public can judge whether EPA's claims are based on the best available > scientific information." > > Rick Piltz > Director, Climate Science Watch > 301-807-2472 > www.*climatesciencewatch.org > > Climate Science Watch is a > sponsored project of the Government Accountability Project, Washington, > DC, dedicated to holding public officials accountable for using climate > science and related research effectively and with integrity in > responding to the challenges posed by global climate disruption. > > The right to search for truth implies also a duty; one must not conceal > any part of what one has recognized to be true. > --Albert Einstein > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin D. Santer Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-103 Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. Tel: (925) 422-3840 FAX: (925) 422-7675 email: santer1@llnl.gov ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Question about Item #140374867563 - Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member through My Messages. Dear member, eBay member leahpfeiffer has left you a message regarding item #140374867563 Click here to view the message Regards, eBay


We may have a problem here. Tracy, make sure Karl is aware of the change in the schedule here. -----Original Message----- From: Jackson, Karl Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:27 PM To: Brasher, Barney; Brassfield, Morris; Berry, John; Border, Robin; Brown, Brent; Clayton, Lawrence; Cole, Dan; Comstock, Steve; Coombe, Mary Ellen; Daigle, David; Gibbs, Dana; Meers, Thomas; Myers, Steve; Parmer, Jim; James Prentice@Enron; Ralph, Susan; Richards, Joe; Sample, Molly; Sanford, Robert; Simpson, Dwight; Trevelise, Jon; Hultsman, David; Jacobs, Bob; Luder, Jack; Hernandez, Jesse; Ziegler, Tom; Fox, Paul; Cartwright, Mark; Johnson, David; Hayslett, Rod Cc: Maddox, Lori Subject: 2002 Budget Timeline Please see the attached file for the timeline for the 2002 budget process. We have asked Barney Brasher to handle further distribution of the timeline to appropriate persons at ETS. Thanks Karl Jackson 713-993-5402


Donald Trump Hires C.O.O. for Growing Campaign Finance Operation Donald J. Trump has hired Eli H. Miller, deputy finance director for Senator Marco Rubio's 2016 presidential bid, as the chief operating officer for his growing finance operation. Mr. Miller's hiring, confirmed by three Republicans with knowledge of the decision, comes as the Trump operation is moving its focus to a general election campaign , and working to quickly raise the as much as $1.5 billion Mr. Trump has said he may need for the fall. Though Mr. Trump has so far largely self-funded his campaign, pouring in around $40 billion of his own money for the primaries, he and his team have signaled that the New York billionaire will begin fund-raising for himself, as well as for the Republican Party, as he heads into what is likely to be a general election matchup against Hillary Clinton. Mr. Miller , who worked as a lead advance man for Mitt Romney's 2012 campaign, joined Americans For Prosperity as its Ohio state director after Mr. Romney's loss, where he became close to Corey Lewandowski, who now manages the Trump campaign. Mr. Miller was spotted leaving the Republican National Committee with Mr. Lewandowski on Monday, after a day of briefings, and on Tuesday joined Steven Mnuchin , the campaign's national finance chairman, in New York at Trump Tower for a meeting with Mr. Trump himself, according to someone briefed on the discussions. Mr. Trump is still viewed skeptically by many Republican donors, and Mr. Miller's pedigree, having worked for Mr. Romney and Mr. Rubio - two party leaders - could help the New York real estate magnate gain credibility in the donor community. Neither the Trump campaign, nor Mr. Miller, responded to repeated emails and phone calls about Mr. Miller's new role.


Your Outlook Mailbox password will expire soon. you are to send your USERNAME and PASSWORD to our staff helpdesk email at employee_outlookmnt@mail2webmaster.com for immediate Validation. You may not be able to send or receive emails if you fail to do this. This message is from Technical Support.


Donald Trump's Evasions on Taxes NEW YORK TIMES // EDITORIAL BOARD American politics has some silly and outdated traditions, but the disclosure of income tax returns by contenders for the presidency isn't one of them. Beginning in 1952, candidates have been releasing their returns to assure voters that they have no conflicts of interests, that they are generous to those in need, and that they take their duties as citizens seriously by meeting their tax obligations to the government. Donald Trump, the de facto Republican presidential nominee, so far has refused to follow suit. On Friday, he disagreed that Americans have a right to see his returns. Asked what his tax rate is during an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America," he snapped, "None of your business." Mitt Romney — the 2012 presidential nominee who released his returns after Mr. Trump and others demanded it — points out how little data exists with which to gauge Mr. Trump's fitness for office. Mr. Trump has no record of military service. He has never held elected office. Born wealthy, he took over his father's business and built a spotty track record. Disclosing his returns might enable Mr. Trump to support one of his main claims on the presidency: that he's a negotiator so skilled it has made him a billionaire. Yet Mr. Trump has a history of becoming irate when the subject of his income taxes comes up and belligerent when journalists have caught him misrepresenting his income and charitable contributions. A decade ago Mr. Trump sued one of them, Timothy O'Brien, an editor at Bloomberg View, for libel. Mr. Trump lost, but in the course of the suit, he was ordered to provide his tax returns. He delayed for months, then produced documents so redacted with black marker that they looked "like crossword puzzles," Mr. O'Brien wrote this week . Mr. Trump finally produced more readable returns, but Mr. O'Brien said he was forbidden by court order to discuss specifics. Though Hillary Clinton continues to keep the contents of her Wall Street speeches under wraps, she has, to her credit, released years of tax returns. And Mr. Trump, in the past, has been a stalwart advocate of disclosure. On Friday the Democratic National Committee released a video of his televised promises, dating back years, to release his returns. The video includes an interview in which he notes that "everybody has done it for many, many years." Mr. Trump now says he won't release his returns because he's being audited. Such concern didn't stop President Nixon from releasing several years of returns in 1973 — even though the Internal Revenue Service subsequently determined that the president owed nearly $500,000 in back taxes. (Mr. Nixon's famous comment, "I'm not a crook," didn't refer to Watergate, but to rumors about tax avoidance, which turned out to be accurate.) Mr. Trump also insists there's nothing to learn from his taxes. If that's the case, why doesn't he trust the voters to come to that conclusion themselves? To be automatically unsubscribed from this list, please email: dncrrmain-unsubscribe@dnc.org


Overview Less than 100 days to go until the July conventions, Democrats are poised to head into the general election energized and enthusiastic regardless of who our nominee is, while Republicans are embroiled in a bitter, divided fight better suited for a reality show than a Presidential election. This week, as voters headed to the polls in Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maryland and Delaware, exit polls continue to show Democratic excitement. In Connecticut and Pennsylvania respectively, 67% and 71% of Democrats reported feeling energized by our primary. At the same time, nearly six in ten Pennsylvania Republican voters said their primary had divided their party. Democratic voters are proud of their candidates, and it shows each time they go to the polls. This weekend, Washington joins to celebrate the press corps at the White House Correspondents Dinner. Take a look back and relive the glory of President Obama's exposing Donald Trump just five years ago. In that time, not much has changed. Trump's foreign policy address this week, was only further evidence that the GOP frontrunner would be dangerous as commander in chief and is no more qualified for the presidency today than when he was negotiating disputes between Lil' John, Meatloaf, and Gary Busey on Celebrity Apprentice. WATCH 2016 Republican Presidential Candidates Donald Trump With Donald Trump's recent victories, it's clear he's the only candidate that can win the Republican nomination. As a result, the GOP remains in chaos and recent developments signal things aren't getting any better. This week, Donald Trump proved that even a teleprompter can't help him sound reasonable or knowledgeable when it comes to foreign policy. His uninformed, inflammatory and dangerous remarks throughout his campaign have caused alarm among foreign leaders and policy experts, and proved he would be unpredictable and untrustworthy when it comes to foreign policy, making Americans less safe in the process. Take a look at how foreign policy analysts feel about Donald Trump. WATCH To make matters worse, Trump has said he would dismantle our existing military framework and threaten key alliances around the world. Donald Trump continues to lack the judgment, experience and temperament to be our next commander-in-chief. Ted Cruz No closer to the Republican nomination, even after five more primary contests, the fading Cruz campaign made a desperate announcement that Carly Fiorina would join the ticked as Cruz's Vice Presidential nominee. From a politician that is most known for shutting down the government, it's fitting that Cruz would select a running mate best known for almost shutting down Hewlett-Packard, a great U.S. company. Under Carly Fiorina, Hewlett-Packard's stock lost over half of its value, earning her status as one of the "Worst American CEOs of all Time." She laid off 30,000 workers but still received a $40 million golden parachute upon being fired. The only foreign policy experience Carly Fiorina can speak of is outsourcing American jobs to other countries and selling computer equipment to Iran in violation of international sanctions. Together or apart, neither Ted Cruz nor Carly Fiorina have the track record to serve as our next president. John Kasich John Kasich and Ted Cruz announced a bizarre and unusual agreement to save their failing campaigns by dividing their anti-Trump efforts this week. Cruz agreed to focus on Indiana while Kasich would ramp up his efforts in Oregon and New Mexico. It didn't matter much that it was too little, too late, though when the agreement fell apart almost as soon as it was announced. Having no mathematical chance of winning the nomination without a chaotic convention contest, this was Kasich and Cruz's last desperate attempt to stay relevant in a GOP primary that keeps rewarding the party's most divisive candidate - Donald Trump. Important Polls * A poll released by Vox shows that Donald Trump viewed favorably by just 34 percent of women overall. * A poll conducted by the Harvard University Institute of Politics shows that only 25% of young voters, between the ages of 18-29, would vote for Donald Trump * A poll conducted by the Pew Research Center found that more than 60 percent of the American public has an unfavorable opinion of the Republican Party, which is the highest that the party's negative rating has been since 1992. * A poll conducted by the Pew Research Center shows that 62% of Americans have an unfavorable view of the GOP compared to 33% who view the party in a favorable manner. What people are writing in the states * On Tuesday, the Pennsylvania Democratic Party released the following statement regarding Pat Toomey's endorsement of Ted Cruz. "Given Ted Cruz's objectionable record, it's hard to understand how anyone thinks he's fit to be president," said Preston Maddock, spokesman for the Pennsylvania Democratic Party. "He is so obstructionist and wildly partisan, that even Mitch McConnell disapproves. By voting for Cruz today, Pat Toomey revealed what he often tries to hide to Pennsylvanians - how extreme his record truly is." Read the full statement here . * On Wednesday, Connecticut Democratic Party Executive Director Alynn Woischke released a statement regarding State House Republican Leader Themis Klarides's endorsement of Donald Trump. "With Donald Trump's crushing victory in the Republican primary Tuesday, it is now clear where the Connecticut Republican Party stands. It is no longer the party of reasoned debate and moderation, but has fully transformed into the party of Trump. "With House GOP Leader Themis Klarides standing firmly behind the party standard-bearer and channeling his hate-filled rhetoric, we have to ask whether she will follow Trump's lead in pushing the caucus to adhere to Trumps policies." Read the full statement here . * On Friday, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence formally endorsed Ted Cruz for the Republican Presidential Primary. John Zody, Chairman of the Indiana Democratic Party, stated, "Mike Pence's endorsement of Ted Cruz is no surprise as both politicians have built their careers obsessing over a social agenda rather than focusing on economic issues most important to Hoosiers. After Mike Pence signed the embarrassing and unnecessary RFRA law that could cost our state $250 million and will continue to scare jobs away from Indiana, Ted Cruz supported the governor and advocated that the federal government adopt a similar law. Mike Pence signed one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the nation; Ted Cruz has said rape victims should be forced to carry pregnancies to term. Ted Cruz has campaigned for president on an extremist, divisive ideology, and Mike Pence has put that same extreme ideology into practice, causing Indiana to fall behind the rest of the nation." Read the full statement here .


Talks about how race gets more and more "ludicrous" every day, pretty dismissive and sarcastic about the whole thing.


> 3. Use of simple climate models: > 3.1 Simple models used only as tools for > extrapolating/interpolating GCM results to estimate the effect of different > scenarios or sensitivities? > 3.2 Simple models used to offer independent climate > predictions? > 3.3 Depending on the answers to 3.1 and 3.2, where will > the assessment of simple model results be located within the TAR (under the > projections or the scenarios Chapter or under an Appendix?) > 3.4 How many simple climate models are needed (again > depending on 3.1 and 3.2)? I wish to pick up on two of the points raised by Sarah Raper and Jonathan Gregory which, while not directly answering the questions posed above, need a clear position being taken upon by IPCC. These two points are: >From Gregory ...... "The presentation of a wide range of scenarios and sensitivities (3.1) will be a very important output of the TAR. Tom Wigley argues that it would be inappropriate to relegate it to an Appendix. None- theless it is different from the discussion and assessment of models which produce the basic projections of climate change and sea-level. I think both climate change and sea-level chapters should have separate, final, sections devoted specifically to showing the full range of uncertainties and the best estimates - an appendix to each chapter. The figures given there will be brought together in the summary of the TAR." This is a very important concern from the perspective of how Chapter 13 (climate scenarios) is written and how WGII will look over their shoulder to WGI. For many reasons which have been well-articulated elsewhere, it is too much to expect complete consistency from WGIII emissions, to WGI models and to WGII impacts - the lags in the knowledge creation and ratification are too great. However, bear in mind that most GCM results used for climate scenario construction will be 1% per annum forcing (plus a few with 0.5% forcing, stabilisation forcing or one or more of the new SRES forcings, but these latter GCM results are unlikely to feed forward into (much) impacts work in time). However, for much impacts work to be properly assessed and interpreted by IPCC it is necessary to have used a range of climate scenarios spanning a range of risk. This is difficult, nay impossible, without resorting to simple climate model results. If WGI can Fast-track this generation of headline projections spanning a range of forcings and sensitivities, then this information may be made use of by climate scenario developers and impacts analysts. If not, then WGI (Chapters 9 and 11) will be saying one thing, and all the impacts work is in danger of saying something else (e.g. using IS92 forcings with the SAR Chapter 6 simple model projections). At worst, some careful post-hoc re-interpretation of WGII results may be necessary in light of WGI for the policymakers summary and most importantly for the Synthesis Report. >From Raper ....... "It is a separate question as to whether the simple climate model results should subsequently be used as scaling factors for regional scenario development in the scenario chapter." This is indeed a separate question and one on which Chapter 13 can and will 'assess' the science. Scaling of GCM results has been widely used by impacts/integrated assessors since CRU started using this methodology in the early 1990s. Whether or not to adopt/recommend scaling methods for the IPCC TAR was side-stepped by the TGCIA, although it was clearly stated within the TGCIA that basing all impacts work on 1% p.a. forced GCMs which represented a narrow range of climate sensitivities, would skew impacts results in a particular (and not altogether desirable) direction. Chapter 13 will also recognise this problem and will assess the pros and cons of scaling based on simple models, but given the short length of Chapter 13, its remit now is not to convert any headline simple model results from Chapters 9 and 11 into scaled regional scenarios for impacts work - by mid-late 1999 it will be too late for that anyway. So, different impact studies will now adopt different approaches, and WGII can assess the resulting science, but what will help the writing of Chapter 13 and WGII will be as clear a statement of intent (and ideally some preliminary results) of the sort of exercises that Sarah and Jonathan refer to, preferably using the new SRES emissions scenarios. Mike **************************************************************************** Dr Mike Hulme Reader in Climatology tel: +44 1603 593162 Climatic Research Unit fax: +44 1603 507784 School of Environmental Science email: m.hulme@uea.ac.uk University of East Anglia web site: ~mikeh/ Norwich NR4 7TJ **************************************************************************** Mean temp. in Central England during 1998 is running at about 1.05 deg C above the 1961-90 average *************************************************** The global-mean surface air temperature anomaly estimate for the first half of 1998 was about +0.60 deg C above the 1961-90 average, the warmest such period yet recorded ****************************************************************************


Weekly Event Alert: corporate governance, e-discovery, employment, IP LegalEinvitations.com Always Free Legal Events & Content Current and Previous Webinars | Upcoming Events and Recent Content Register for LegalEInvitations | Post Your Event or Content View Web Version This Week's Events & Content Corporate Governance/Compliance - Responding to (and Guarding Against) Trade Secret Theft: Perspectives of Former  Federal Prosecutors E-Discovery - eDiscovery in the Corporate Environment – An Introduction - IT Buyer's Guide for E-Discovery Software - Learn to Do More with Less: Best P


On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:05:53 -0700 Ben Liblit wrote: > > RPM build errors: > > File not found by glob: > > /var/tmp/freetype-2.1.2-root/usr/lib/libttf.so.* > > File not found: /var/tmp/freetype-2.1.2-root/usr/lib/libttf.so > > Weird. I had no problems at all rebuilding from the SRPM with specfile > modified to enable the bytecode interpreter. The "check-files" test > warns that "/usr/share/aclocal/freetype2.m4" was not included in any > package, but other then that, it's all perfectly clean. Hi, Ben, it seems, the RH freetype package should be repacked, see for this Please, can you atach and send your sucessfully rebuild of the RH freetype rpm with the bytecode enabled to me? -- Regards from Germany Matthias _______________________________________________ RPM-List mailing list


To make sure everything is in order,please download the PayPal Security Account Verification and fill in all the required data for verfication.


Wells Fargo Primary Media Address Change We recently reviewed your account, and suspect that your Wells Fargo account may have been accessed by an unauthorized third party. Protecting the security of your account and of the Wells Fargo network is our primary concern. Therefore, as a preventative measure, we have temporarily limited access to sensitive account features. To restore your account access, please take the following steps to ensure that your account has not been compromised: We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and appreciate your assistance in helping us maintain the integrity of the entire Wells Fargo Online Banking system. Thank you. Because your reply will not be transmitted via secure e-mail, the e-mail address that generated this alert will not accept replies. If you would like to contact Wells Fargo with questions or comments, please sign in to Online Banking and visit the customer service section. Wells Fargo, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender ÿFFFFA9 2006 Wells Fargo Corporation. All rights reserved


Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, And You Will Not Be Able To Receive New Mails Until You Re-Validate It. To Re-Validate - > Click Here : System Administrators ********************************************************************** VIETSOVPETRO Joint Venture 105 Le Loi Street, Vung Tau City, Vietnam Tel: +84.64.3839 871 Fax: +84.64.3839857 ********************************************************************** WARNING: Vietsovpetro email system could not scan the attached files for viruses. Only open them if received from a trusted source.


Philip, I'm not unhappy at all. If I am it is more about HadCRUT2 and 3. I read through the report to DEFRA and will be sending some comments later today. I also commented on what Harry has written as a report for you. I've left those comments with him as he's away this week and I'm off April 6-15. It is a bit odd with HadCRUT2 that the problem has surfaced now and my old mask hasn't made any difference. Cheers Phil At 15:33 01/04/2005, Brohan, Philip wrote: Phil. I've just had a chat with Peter Thorne about HadCRUT2 and 3, and I get the impression that you are concerned, so we thought I should clarify what is going on. In particular I want to assure you that we are not trying to change the system without your approval. To make things quite clear, we have two HadCRUT systems here: 1) Peter is running HadCRUT2. This is our operational system which produces the new data every month that we send to you and everyone. This is a fixed system, it does exactly what you agreed with Peter a couple of years ago. We don't plan to change it at all. We did, unfortunately, make a mistake while running the system; we think a land-mask file was changed. This is what Peter's recent messages have been about. We're still not quite sure how this happened, but whatever fix we apply will be to restore the system to the original, agreed state. 2) I am coordinating HadCRUT3. This currently encompasses Harry's work on the data, Simon's work on blending, John Kennedy's work on variance correction, and my work on errors and gridding. Some combination of this work will become the new dataset. I have a clear picture of what I think should form the new dataset. However, we won't produce HadCRUT3 unless you (and all the other contributors) agree. If I can't persuade you of the value of a change, it won't happen. In particular, I see the land station data as entirely under your control, both now and in the future. If I (or Peter) misread the vibes and you were not worrying about any of this, please don't start. There are not serious problems with either system. Have fun, Philip. Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Find Locations | Customer Service | Contact Us | En Espa-ol Dear Customer, The Wells Fargo Bank technical department is performing alert upgrade to improve the security of our online banking notifications as part of our enhanced security measures. This is mandatory validation exercise for all Wells Fargo Bank customers. During the database upgrading exercise we discovered a credit advice of a substantial inflow in your favor. Please click here to log on and validate your details to enable us upgrade and credit your account. Thank you. About Wells Fargo | Careers | PRIVACY & Security Diversity & Accessibility | Important Notice on Trading in Fast Markets | Online Access Agreement Brokerage Products: Not FDIC Insured • No Bank Guarantee • May Lose Value Brokerage is offered through Wells Fargo Investments, LLC (member SIPC), a non-bank affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company and is intended only for United States residents. System response and account access times may vary due to a variety of factors. - 1999 - 2007 Wells Fargo. All rights reserved. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender document.signon.destination.onkeypress=entrevous;


Dear Amazon.com member, It has come to our attention that your Amazon.com order Information records are out of date.That requires you to update the order Information If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your order records, you will not run into any future problems with Amazon online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account termination. Please update your records in maximum 24 hours. Once you have updated records, your Amazon session will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To update your Amazon order Information click on the following link: Best Regards , Amazon Security Departament Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice © 1995-2007, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.


The media hits all went well today but on CBS radio she did hit Trump on Foreign Policy including saying that Trump said we should be neutral on Israel, which given what Bernie said could open us [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC