X-Sender: esper@mail.wsl.ch Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:21:03 +0200 To: Keith Briffa From: Jan Esper Subject: minor explosion Cc: Wilson Rob Hi Keith thank you for the message and the comments to the Siberia draft. We are intending to finalize a draft when Rob is coming over and we go on a sampling trip to the Bavarian Forest and E-Germany. We will then also discuss of data-overlap issue again and might include some extra figure with our record re-calculated (without Tornetraesk and Polar Ural). However, I (Jan) an not sure that we should have another figure with only the Mann and the (reduced) Esper series. Second, it seems that Mann used the density records from these two sites only (not ring width). Lets see. We would really like to send you the final draft, and ask you to become the fourth author? We ask this not only because of the "minor explosion" that might happen, but also because some of the arguments in the draft were made earlier by you anyway. What do you think? Take care Jan and Dave CC R Wilson Jan with respect to the overlap problem we could agree to differ for now -I think the problem is much more in the earlier period anyway but I suggest you go ahead and submit it anyway. There are some minor wording points but nothing that affects the meaning. You know that in my opinion the recent similarity in the records is driven by instrumental data inclusion (or calibration against instrumental data) and that Mann's earlier data are strongly biased towards summer and northern land signals. I think you will start a minor explosion - but that is what science needs . I looked at your tree-line data and thought them very interesting. In my opinion the way you directed the interpretation was what drew your criticisms . For a climate journal you should have been pointing out the complicated regional responses (to the temperature record) rather than trying to state a simple overall response. The data are clearly important and you should have no trouble publishing them if you rethink the approach to the description (no work needed). I think Boreas or Arctic and Alpine Res. are better targets though. I enjoyed the discussions also and it is frustrating not to be able to get up to speed with your other projects. I will get back to you when I have looked more at the idea of the big review paper. the very best to you and all Keith At 09:55 AM 10/8/03 +0200, Jan Esper wrote: Hi Keith with respect to our EOS draft, I am still thinking about the data overlap argument you made. 1. I still believe that the overlap is not that significant, and that the significance is changing dramatically with time (less in more recent centuries). 2. With respect to the aim of the paper, we do NOT intend to explain the similarity between the records. We rather address that the recons differ in the lower frequency domains AND are much more similar in the higher frequency domains. I believe that this is crucial. (One could also say that we only address the dissimilarity, and the arguments related to that.) I appreciated the discussions we had very, very much (especially the one in the night before the official meeting). Take care Jan CC D Frank R Wilson -- Dr. Jan Esper Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Zuercherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf Switzerland Phone: +41-1-739 2510 Fax: +41-1-739 2215 Email: esper@wsl.ch -- Professor Keith Briffa, Climatic Research Unit University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. Phone: +44-1603-593909 Fax: +44-1603-507784 [1] -- Dr. Jan Esper Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Zuercherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf Switzerland Phone: +41-1-739 2510 Fax: +41-1-739 2215 Email: esper@wsl.ch -- Professor Keith Briffa, Climatic Research Unit University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. Phone: +44-1603-593909 Fax: +44-1603-507784 [2] References 1.  2.  3.


>Envelope-to: t.d.davies@uea.ac.uk >From: "Andrew Watson" >To: "Trevor Davies" >Subject: Climate change centre info. >Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:11:01 +0100 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 > >Hi Trevor >I was with John Shepherd earlier this week. He told me he >was phoned up last Friday by Tariq Ali at Imperial College, >seeking to sign him up to the IC bid; it seems that IC's >relations with Oxford may have gone sour. If that is the >case, IC will probably make strenuous efforts to detach some >of the members of the consortium that UEA is trying to put >together. >I was attending a meeting on the "miilliesym" proposal, and >we were treated to a talk from Ian Dwyer of NERC (new >position to co-ordinate global change research) on the >climate change centre. Two things I picked up that I didn't >know before (but you may) were >(1) All the decisions, both on the outline proposals and >full proposals, will be taken by a panel of experts >(academics from overseas and industry). There will not be >the normal peer review system. I asked if there would be the >opportunity to suggest names for this panel, but the answer >appeared to be no; the panel will be selected and organised >by the research councils, chiefly NERC. >(2) The split of funding for the centre will be (per year) 1 >million NERC, 0.75 million EPSRC, 0.25 million ESRC. >Cheers, Andy >*********************************** >Prof Andrew J. Watson >email: a.watson@uea.ac.uk > or : a.j.watson@uea.ac.uk >phone: (44) 1603 593761 direct > 1603 456161 switchboard > 1603 507719 fax >School of Environmental Sciences >University of East Anglia >NORWICH NR4 7TJ >U.K. >~ajw/ajw.htm >*********************************** > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Professor Trevor D. Davies Dean, School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ United Kingdom Tel. +44 1603 592836 Fax. +44 1603 507719 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Watch here From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 8:15 AM To: Kane, Michael; Comm_D Subject: RE: Video request: Chris Collins in CNN Rep. Chris Collins: - Importance of electing a Republican because of SCOTUS - "Trump's message hasn't budge one iota over the past year, and it won't." From: Kane, Michael Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 8:08 AM To: Comm_D Subject: Video request: Chris Collins in CNN Happening now


Tracy, A portion of the $200k cost is for an EWS team which does Mergers, Aquisitions, and Divestitures(MAD) work. ETS' allocated cost is approximately $50K for the MAD team but we will only pay for actual charges in 2002 if we use the team. Gary -----Original Message----- From: Smith, Gary Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:57 AM To: Geaccone, Tracy Cc: Leschber, Edie Subject: RE: ENA Allocations to Othe BUs - Plan 2002 Tracy, There is a team in Enron Wholesale Services Human Resources which is dedicated to PEP/PRC design and administration. The Human Resources charge of $200K to ETS is an allocation of the PEP/PRC team's cost. Gary -----Original Message----- From: Geaccone, Tracy Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:32 PM To: Leschber, Edie; Smith, Gary Cc: Botello, Mary Subject: RE: ENA Allocations to Othe BUs - Plan 2002 I need to understand what services you are providing and to what group within ETS. Thanks Tracy Geaccone -----Original Message----- From: Leschber, Edie Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:42 PM To: Geaccone, Tracy; Smith, Gary Subject: ENA Allocations to Othe BUs - Plan 2002 Attached please find a schedule of planned allocations from ENA to other Business units. Please review those allocations to your business unit (ETS) and provide positive confirmation of your agreement. Thank you, Edie Leschber ENA Financial Operations X30669 >


Check out our $1,000.00 internet challenge! \tab \tab \'b7 What if you could have a protected job that allows you to work as little as two hours a week and it still pays you up to $800.00 every week for the next 20 years? Well - Here it is!Take our $1,000.00 online challenge! \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab Check it out \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab The sender of this message has stated its assurance that the sender complies with all state guidelines and codes regarding UCE. This transmittal is specifically not intended for residents of the state of Washington. If you wish to opt out of receiving of this message in the future, please href="">click here and enter your email address. Thanks for your positive assistance.


Comrades, We are pleased to announce yet another addition to the NSM Ranks. The Party has just expanded into the State of Delaware, and a new contact point has opened for the NSM in the State. To contact the local branch of the NSM in Delaware: nsmde89@yahoo.com In addition to the new contact point in Delaware, a new video is currently showing on the NSM Mainsite www.nsm88.org advertising the 2 Marches the NSM has organized in Missouri and Texas this coming weekend. Check it out, some footage of our march in DC, etc. -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


Happy Primary Day! In a short time, the polls will close in West Virginia and we wanted to share with you and your teams some topline information on their Delegate Selection process. On our side, there are 29 pledged delegates up for grabs today. On the GOP side there are 34 delegates allocated to West Virginia. Also, the Nebraska GOP primary is today. Below, please find a brief summary of the process; attached you will find the internal fact sheet for West Virginia. As always, please let us know if you have any questions. WEST VIRGINIA(Primary) Polls open at 6:30am ET and close at 7:30pm ET Results can be found here- Democratic Process FYI, in addition to Clinton, Sanders and O'Malley, Rocky De La Fuente, Keith Judd and Paul Farrell, Jr. appear on the ballot. Judd is a convicted felon, who ran in 2012 while in prison; he is now on parole. He is on the ballot in 6 other states (NH, TX, OK, LA MO and CA). He received 1.31% of the vote in OK, but received less than 1% in the other states, for a total of 8,575 in the 5 states where he has been on the ballot to-date. Farrell is an attorney from West Virginia and only appears on the West Virginia ballot. The West Virginia State Party believes there is a possibility that Farrell will reach the 15% threshold. There are a total of 29 pledged delegates that will be allocated proportionally based on today's results. A 15 percent threshold is required in order for a presidential contender to received pledged delegates at either the congressional district or statewide level. The delegate breakdown is: District Level-20 delegates PLEO- 3 delegates At-Large-6 delegates District level delegates are allocated based on the results in each Congressional District. The PLEO and At-Large delegates are allocated based on the statewide results. In addition to the 29 pledged delegates, there are 8 unpledged delegates from West Virginia. Republican Process All 34 of West Virginia's delegates to the Republican National Convention are bound in today's Presidential Primary. Each delegate candidate is individually listed on the ballot along with their presidential preference. The delegate candidate receiving the most votes in each contest is elected. 9 district delegates (3 delegates are elected in each of the state's 3 Congressional Districts). 22 at-large delegates (10 at-large plus 12 bonus) are elected statewide. The 3 party leaders, the National Committeeman, the National Committeewoman, and the chairman of the West Virginia's Republican Party, will attend the convention, by virtue of their position, bound to the candidate receiving the most votes statewide. NEBRASKA(Primary - REPUBLICAN ONLY) Democratic caucuses were held March 5. Sanders received 60% of the vote (15 pledged delegates) and Clinton received 40% (10 pledged delegates). The polls are open from 8:00am to 8:00pm CT and from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm MT (9:00am - 9:00pm ET). Results can be found here: On May 14, the Nebraska State Republican Convention convenes. Congressional District Caucuses made up of the State Convention delegates from each of Nebraska's 3 congressional districts elect the 9 district National Convention delegates (3 per congressional district) according to the results of the primary. The State Convention as a whole selects 24 (10 base at-large plus 14 bonus) at-large delegates to the Republican National Convention according to the results of the primary. The 3 party leaders, the National Committeeman, the National Committeewoman, and the chairman of Nebraska's Republican Party, will attend the convention as pledged delegates by virtue of their position. National Convention delegates are bound to vote for the candidate they pledged support for the first 2 ballots at the National Convention unless the candidate received less than 35% of the vote.


Re: Mosko's Calls a/o 4:30pm PST/7:30am Singapore time Mon 3/17 get frost in mtg next mon w leah..Â sent on the run On Mar 17, 2014, at 4:30 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: OUT CALLS, 03/12/14 07:33 PM, Jon Mandel, (Mobile) (516) 987-3201, IN CALLS, 03/17/14 04:28 PM, Jeff Frost, (Business) (310) 244-9215, Please call re: BOONDOCKS IN CALLS, 03/17/14 11:04 AM, Doug Wick, (Business) (310) 853-4606, pls call IN CALLS, 03/17/14 10:49 AM, Alex Rose, (Business) (714) 744-7941, wants u 2 call Michelle McLaren.she got the invite from someone else but Alex would like to encou


Dear Phil, I've known Rick Piltz for many years. He's a good guy. I believe he used to work with Mike MacCracken at the U.S. Global Change Research Program. I'm really sorry that you have to go through all this stuff, Phil. Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I'll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted. I'll help you to deal with Michaels and the CEI in any way that I can. The only reason these guys are going after you is because your work is of crucial importance - it changed the way the world thinks about human effects on climate. Your work mattered in the 1980s, and it matters now. With best wishes, Ben P.Jones@uea.ac.uk wrote: > Ben, > Thanks for backing me up with whoever Rick is. I forwarded the message > to Rick. So if you want to add anything else feel free to do so. > We have more stations going into the latest CRU data than we did in the > 1980s. > > In Lecce next week for 2 days at a GKSS summer school led by Hans VS! > > Cheers > Phil > >> Dear Rick, >> >> I am prepared to help in any way that I can. >> >> As I see it, there are two key issues here. >> >> First, the CEI and Pat Michaels are arguing that Phil Jones and >> colleagues at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) willfully and >> intentionally "destroyed" some of the raw surface temperature data used >> in the construction of the gridded surface temperature datasets. >> >> Second, the CEI and Pat Michaels contend that the CRU surface >> temperature datasets provided the sole basis for IPCC "discernible human >> influence" conclusions. >> >> Both of these arguments are factually incorrect. First, there was no >> intentional destruction of the primary source data. I am sure that, over >> 20 years ago, Phil could not have foreseen that the raw station data >> might be the subject of legal proceedings by the CEI and Pat Michaels. >> Raw data were NOT secretly destroyed to avoid efforts by other >> scientists to replicate the CRU and Hadley Centre-based estimates of >> global-scale changes in near-surface temperature. In fact, a key point >> here is that other groups (primarily at NCDC and at GISS, but also in >> Russia) WERE able to replicate the major findings of the CRU and Hadley >> Centre groups. The NCDC and GISS groups performed this replication >> completely independently. They made different choices in the complex >> process of choosing input data, adjusting raw station data for known >> inhomogeneities (such as urbanization effects, changes in >> instrumentation, site location, and observation time), and gridding >> procedures. NCDC and GISS-based estimates of global surface temperature >> changes are in good accord with the HadCRUT results. >> >> I'm sure that Pat Michaels does not have the primary source data used in >> his Ph.D. thesis. Perhaps one of us should request the datasets used in >> Michaels' Ph.D. work, and then ask the University of Wisconsin to >> withdraw Michaels' Ph.D. if he fails to produce every dataset and >> computer program used in the course of his thesis research. >> >> I'm equally sure that John Christy and Roy Spencer have not preserved >> every single version of their MSU-based estimates of tropospheric >> temperature change. Nor is it likely that Christy and Spencer have >> preserved for posterity each and every computer program they used to >> generate UAH tropospheric temperature datasets. >> >> [One irony here is that the Christy/Spencer claim that the troposphere >> had cooled over the satellite era did not stand up to rigorous >> scientific scrutiny. Christy and Spencer have made a scientific career >> out of being wrong. In contrast, CRU's claim of a pronounced increase in >> global-mean surface temperature over the 20th century HAS withstood the >> test of time.] >> >> The CEI and Michaels are applying impossible legal standards to science. >> They are essentially claiming that if we do not retain - and make >> available to self-appointed auditors - every piece of information about >> every scientific paper we have ever published, we are perpetrating some >> vast deception on the American public. I think most ordinary citizens >> understand that few among us have preserved every bank statement and >> every utility bill we've received in the last 20 years. >> >> The second argument - that "discernible human influence" findings are >> like a house of cards, resting solely on one observational dataset - is >> also invalid. The IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) considers MULTIPLE >> observational estimates of global-scale near-surface temperature >> changes. It does not rely on HadCRUT data alone - as is immediately >> obvious from Figure 2.1b of the TAR, which shows CRU, NCDC, and GISS >> global-mean temperature changes. >> >> As pointed out in numerous scientific assessments (e.g., the IPCC TAR >> and Fourth Assessment Reports, the U.S. Climate Change Science Program >> Synthesis and Assessment Report 1.1, and the CCSP "State of Knowledge" >> Report), rigorous statistical fingerprint studies have now been >> performed with a whole range of climate variables - and not with surface >> temperature only. Examples include variables like ocean heat content, >> atmospheric water vapor, surface specific humidity, continental river >> runoff, sea-level pressure patterns, stratospheric and tropospheric >> temperature, tropopause height, zonal-mean precipitation over land, and >> Arctic sea-ice extent. The bottom-line message from this body of work is >> that natural causes alone CANNOT plausibly explain the climate changes >> we have actually observed. The climate system is telling us an >> internally- and physically-consistent story. The integrity and >> reliability of this story does NOT rest on a single observational >> dataset, as Michaels and the CEI incorrectly claim. >> >> Michaels should and does know better. I can only conclude from his >> behavior - and from his participation in this legal action - that he is >> being intentionally dishonest. His intervention seems to be timed to >> influence opinion in the run-up to the Copenhagen meeting, and to garner >> publicity for himself. In my personal opinion, Michaels should be kicked >> out of the AMS, the University of Virginia, and the scientific community >> as a whole. He cannot on the one hand engage in vicious public attacks >> on the reputations of individual scientists (in the past he has attacked >> Tom Karl, Tom Wigley, Jim Hansen, Mike Mann, myself, and numerous >> others), and on the other hand expect to be treated as a valued member >> of our professional societies. >> >> The sad thing here is that Phil Jones is one of the true gentlemen of >> our field. I have known Phil for most of my scientific career. He is the >> antithesis of the secretive, "data destroying" character the CEI and >> Michaels are trying to portray to the outside world. Phil and Tom Wigley >> have devoted significant portions of their scientific careers to the >> construction of the land surface temperature component of the HadCRUT >> dataset. They have conducted this research in a very open and >> transparent manner - examining sensitivities to different gridding >> algorithms, different ways of adjusting for urbanization effects, use of >> various subsets of data, different ways of dealing with changes in >> spatial coverage over time, etc. They have thoroughly and >> comprehensively documented all of their dataset construction choices. >> They have done a tremendous service to the scientific community - and to >> the planet - by making gridded surface temperature datasets available >> for scientific research. They deserve medals as big as soup plates - not >> the kind of crap they are receiving from Pat Michaels and the CEI. >> >> The bottom line, Rick, is that I am incensed at the "data destruction" >> allegations that are being unfairly and incorrectly leveled against Phil >> and Tom by the CEI and Pat Michaels. Please let me know how you think I >> can be most effective in rebutting such allegations. Whatever you need >> from me - you've got it. >> >> I hope you don't mind, but I'm also copying my email to John Mitchell at >> the Hadley Centre. I know that John also feels very strongly about these >> issues. >> >> With best regards, >> >> Ben >> >> Rick Piltz wrote: >>> Gentlemen-- >>> >>> I expect that you have already been made aware of the petition to EPA >>> from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (and Pat Michaels) calling for >>> a re-opening of public comment on EPA's prospective "endangerment" >>> finding on greenhouse gases. CEI is charging that the CRU at East Anglia >>> has destroyed the raw data for a portion of the global temperature >>> record, thus destroying the integrity of the IPCC assessments and any >>> other work that treats the UK Jones-Wigley global temperature data >>> record as scientifically legitimate. I have attached the petition in >>> PDF, with a statements by CEI and Michaels. >>> >>> The story was reported in Environment & Energy Daily yesterday (below). >>> They called me for it, presumably because I am on their call list as >>> someone who gets in the face of the global warming disinformation >>> campaign, among other things. I hit CEI, but I don't have a technical >>> response to their allegations. >>> >>> Who is responding to this charge on behalf of the science community? >>> Surely someone will have to, if only because EPA will need to know >>> exactly what to say. And really I believe all of you, as the >>> authoritative experts, should be prepared to do that in a way that has >>> some collective coherence. >>> >>> I am going to be writing about this on my Climate Science Watch Website >>> as soon as I think I can do so appropriately. I am most interested in >>> what you have to say to set the record straight and put things in >>> perspective -- either on or off the record, whichever you wish. Will >>> someone please explain this to me? >>> >>> Best regrads, >>> Rick >>> >>> >>> *1. CLIMATE: Free-market group attacks data behind EPA >>> 'endangerment' proposal (E&E News PM, 10/07/2009) >>> >>> * >>> >>> >>> *Robin Bravender, E&E reporter* >>> >>> A free-market advocacy group has launched another attack on the science >>> behind U.S. EPA's proposed finding that greenhouse gases endanger human >>> health and welfare. >>> >>> The Competitive Enterprise Institute -- a vocal foe of EPA's efforts to >>> finalize its "endangerment finding" -- *petitioned* >>> >>> the agency this week to reopen the public comment period on the >>> proposal, arguing that critical data used to formulate the plan have >>> been destroyed and that the available data are therefore unreliable. >>> >>> *At issue is a set of raw data from the Climatic Research Unit at the >>> University of East Anglia in Norwich, England, that includes surface >>> temperature averages from weather stations around the world. *According >>> to CEI, the data provided a foundation for the 1996 second assessment >>> report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which EPA used >>> when drafting its endangerment proposal. >>> >>> According to the Web site for East Anglia's research unit, "Data storage >>> availability in the 1980s meant that we were not able to keep the >>> multiple sources for some sites, only the station series after >>> adjustment for homogeneity issues. We, therefore, do not hold the >>> original raw data but only the value-added (i.e. quality controlled and >>> homogenized) data." >>> >>> CEI general counsel Sam Kazman said this lack of raw data calls the >>> endangerment finding into question. *"EPA is resting its case on >>> international studies that in turn relied on CRU data. But CRU's >>> suspicious destruction of its original data, disclosed at this late >>> date, makes that information totally unreliable," he said.* "If EPA >>> doesn't re-examine the implications of this, it's stumbling blindly into >>> the most important regulatory issue we face." >>> >>> *In a statement filed with CEI's petition, Cato Institute senior fellow >>> Patrick Michaels called the development a "totally new element" in the >>> endangerment debate. "It violates basic scientific principles and throws >>> even more doubt onto the contention that anthropogenic greenhouse gas >>> emissions endanger human welfare," he wrote. >>> >>> *Michaels is a University of Virginia professor and author of the book, >>> "The Satanic Gases: Clearing the Air about Global Warming." He stepped >>> down from his post as Virginia's state climatologist in 2007 after he >>> came under fire for publicly doubting global warming while taking money >>> from the utility industry (/ Greenwire/ >>> , Sept. 27, 2007). >>> >>> Representatives of East Anglia University's Climatic Research Unit were >>> not available to comment on the CEI petition. >>> >>> EPA spokeswoman Adora Andy said the agency will evaluate the petition. >>> "But after initial review of the statement their position rests upon," >>> Andy added, "it certainly does not appear to justify upheaval." >>> >>> The petition is the latest in a string of CEI challenges to the >>> proceedings surrounding the endangerment finding and other Obama >>> administration climate policies. Last week, the group threatened to sue >>> the administration over documents related to the costs of a federal >>> cap-and-trade program to curb greenhouse gas emissions. And in June, the >>> group accused EPA officials of suppressing dissenting views from an EPA >>> environmental economist during the run-up to the release of the >>> endangerment proposal. >>> >>> Rick Piltz, director of the watchdog group Climate Science Watch and a >>> former official at the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, said that >>> although the research unit's data are among key data sets used by the >>> IPCC, "it's not the only data set that they use." He also said EPA drew >>> on "multifaceted, robust" data in the technical support document >>> underlying the finding. >>> >>> EPA's endangerment finding relies most heavily on IPCC's 2007 fourth >>> assessment; synthesis and assessment products of the U.S. Climate Change >>> Science Program; National Research Council reports under the U.S. >>> National Academy of Sciences; the EPA annual report on U.S. greenhouse >>> gas emission inventories; and the EPA assessment of the effects of >>> global change on regional U.S. air quality, according to the agency's >>> technical support document. >>> >>> "You do not need to reopen the IPCC reports and the technical support >>> document on the EPA endangerment finding because of something having to >>> do with the raw data from the temperature record from East Anglia >>> University in the 1980s," Piltz said, adding that the IPCC carefully >>> vets its data. >>> >>> Piltz said CEI is on an ideological mission to head off EPA attempts to >>> finalize the endangerment finding and is "grasping at straws" by >>> challenging the IPCC data. >>> >>> "Their bottom line is an antiregulatory ideology," Piltz said. "When >>> they use science, they use it tactically, and they will go to war with >>> the mainstream science community." >>> >>> Republican senators also weighed in yesterday, urging EPA to reopen the >>> public comment period on the endangerment finding to investigate the >>> scientific merit of the research data. >>> >>> "It's astonishing that EPA, so confident in the scientific integrity of >>> its work, refuses to be transparent with the public about the most >>> consequential rulemaking of our time," said Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), >>> ranking member of the Environment and Public Works Committee. Inhofe >>> sent a joint press release with Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) accusing EPA >>> of relying upon flawed data. >>> >>> "Now the evidence shows that scientists interested in testing some of >>> EPA's assertions can't engage in basic scientific work, such as assuring >>> reproducibility and objectivity, because the data they seek have been >>> destroyed," Inhofe said. "In order to conform to federal law and basic >>> standards of scientific integrity, EPA must reopen the record so the >>> public can judge whether EPA's claims are based on the best available >>> scientific information." >>> >>> Rick Piltz >>> Director, Climate Science Watch >>> 301-807-2472 >>> www.**climatesciencewatch.org >>> >>> Climate Science Watch is a >>> sponsored project of the Government Accountability Project, Washington, >>> DC, dedicated to holding public officials accountable for using climate >>> science and related research effectively and with integrity in >>> responding to the challenges posed by global climate disruption. >>> >>> The right to search for truth implies also a duty; one must not conceal >>> any part of what one has recognized to be true. >>> --Albert Einstein >>> >> >> -- >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Benjamin D. Santer >> Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison >> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory >> P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-103 >> Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. >> Tel: (925) 422-3840 >> FAX: (925) 422-7675 >> email: santer1@llnl.gov >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin D. Santer Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-103 Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. Tel: (925) 422-3840 FAX: (925) 422-7675 email: santer1@llnl.gov ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


We recently have determined that different computers have logged into your PayPal account, and multiple password failures were present before the login. One of our Customer Service employees has already tryed to telephonically reach you. As our employee did not manage to reach you, this email has been sent to your notice. Therefore your account has been temporary suspended. We need you to confirm your identity in order to regain full privileges of your account. If this is not completed by August 17, 2005, we reserve the right to terminate all privileges of your account indefinitly, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. We thank you for your cooperation in this manner. To confirm your identity please follow the link below: Thank you for your patience in this matter. PayPal - Customer Service Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.


Place or Update Credit Card on File Dear eBay Customer ,This is your final warning about the safety of your eBay account. If you do not update your billing informations your access on eBay will be restricted and the user deleted. This might be due to either following reasons: - A recent change in your personal information (i.e. change of address) - Submiting invalid information during the initial sign up process. - An inability to accurately verify your selected option of payment due an internal error within our processors. Your credit card on file with eBay Card number: XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX (Not shown for security purposes) Expiration date: 11/05 Please sign in to your eBay account and update your billing information:" > If your account information is not updated, your ability to sell or bid on eBay will become restricted. Thank you,eBay Billing Department eBay treats your personal information with the utmost care, and our Privacy Policy is designed to protect you and your information. eBay will never ask their users for personal information, such as bank account numbers, credit card numbers, pin numbers, passwords, or Social Security numbers in an email. For more information on how to protect your eBay password and your account, please visit User Account Protection. This eBay notice was sent to you based on your eBay account preferences and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. To change your notification preferences, click here. If you would like to receive this email in text format, click here. Copyright © 2004 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc.


Dear eBay Community Member, It has come to our attention that your eBay billing informations are out of order. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account suspension. Please update your records by November 10th. Once you have updated your account records your eBay session will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. Failure to update will result in cancellation of service, Terms of Service (TOS) violations or future problems. To update your eBay records click here: Thank you for using eBay. Regards, eBay Billing gmqpwv


Thanks Ambassador, Let me find out and send a few emails around here and see what people are saying. Thanks - Jordan Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org > On May 2, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Louis Susman wrote: > > Jordan, > > Anji Hunter was Gordon Brown's and Tony Blair's private secretary. Her husband is the main reporter for Sky News. Any way I can help accommodate her request to get into the convention in Philadelphia? > > Lou > > >> From: Anji Hunter > >> Date: May 1, 2016 at 5:26:06 PM CDT >> To: Ambasador Louis and Marjorie Susman > >> Cc: Ambasador Louis and Marjorie Susman > >> Subject: Hello! >> >> Dear Marjorie and Lou, >> >> I hope this finds you both well? What doings, both sides of the pond,,, our elections kick off this week, will be resolved in June, rumblings will continue, and then it's all eyes on you guys..! >> >> Adam is assigned to cover the Conventions and we will both be in Washington, staying in Georgetown, 21-25 July, and just wondered if you might happen to be there then? It is an off-chance, I know, but it would be great if you were, and had an evening free for a dinner with us! >> >> Secondly, and forgive me for even asking, is there any way I can get entry to the Philadelphia DNC? As a sister party member? Long time fan? I will pay, of course, if that is an option - we, the Labour Party (and please accept my apologies for their current appalling transgressions) charge for guests and maybe there is a similiar arrangement. Anyway, I would, of course, love to be there. But also understand if there is nothing you can do and feel overwhelmed with people hassling you! >> >> But hope we will catch up with you, anyway. Are you over here, at all...? >> >> Love from us both, >> Anjix >> >> >> >


In not breaking news, no one will care about, I am going to miss the roundtable on Friday. Zach has it under control and its only 20 people.Thanks - Jordan Jordan KaplanNational Finance DirectorDemocratic National Committee(202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c)kaplanj@dnc.org


732-578-0100. i will compile a list and pass it along via email. regards, todd j. goehring -----Original Message----- From: Donohoe, Tom Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:42 PM To: todd@mrienergy.com Subject: > > > Todd, > > I would like to know which companies you have represented me to, and > the result. > > Please let me know as soon as possible. > > I also would like your phone number. > > Tom Donohoe > 713-853-7151 ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************


Watch here From: "Sarge, Matthew" > Date: Monday, May 16, 2016 at 11:22 AM To: Comm_D > Cc: "djtspeaks@hillaryclinton.com " > Subject: RE: Video Request: NYT article authors on CNN Say they stand by their article Interviews with women paint occasionally contradictory views of Trump From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 11:09 AM To: Comm_D Subject: Video Request: NYT article authors on CNN


Andre, I have been closely involved in the CR fiasco. I have had papers that I refereed (and soundly rejected), under De Freitas's editorship, appear later in the journal -- without me seeing any response from the authors. As I have said before to others, his strategy is first to use mainly referees that are in the anti-greenhouse community, and second, if a paper is rejected, to ignore that review and seek another more 'sympathic' reviewer. In the second case he can then (with enough reviews) claim that the honest review was an outlier. I agree that an ethics committee is needed and I would be happy to serve on such a committee. It would have to have endorsement by international societies, like Roy. Soc., US Nat. Acad., Acad. Europ., plus RMS, AMS, AGU, etc. Jim Titus mentioned to me that in the legal profession here people are disbarred for behavior like that of De Freitas (and even John Christy -- although this is a more subtle case). We cannot do that of course, but we can alert the community of honest scientists to such behavior and formally discredit these people. The Danish Acad. did something like this recently, but were not entirely successful. In the meantime, I urge people to dissociate themselves from Climate Research. The residual 'editorial' (a word I use almost tongue in cheek) board is looking like a rogues' gallery of skeptics. Those remaining who are credible scientists should resign. Tom. +++++++++++++++++ André Berger wrote: > Dear Stefan, > Dear Mike, > Dear Collegues, > > I admire the courage of Stefan and of all other colleagues who are > willing to answer these highly controversed papers (garbage as Marty > said). I am personally tired of analysing these papers, having quit > doing this for the Ministry and European Commission some 5 years ago. > > Nevertheless, I am also sad when I see these papers, mostly because they > succeeded to be published. So not only we have to teach their authors > the Science of climate but also the reviewers and/or the > editors/publishers who have accepted them. This is a huge effort. I, > personally, would like to see an International Committee of Ethics (or > something like this) in Geo-Sciences be created as it is the case for > Medical Sciences and Biotechnology. > > I have been told that AMS has such a Committee who is a kind of super > peer-review telling what is wrong in some declarations, papers, books > .... Is anybody willing to participate in an attempt to create such a > Committee within AGU-EGU-IUGG ... ? > > In the meantime, I am please to send you here attached an email by R.L. > Park on Soon, Baliunas, Seitz and others. > > Best Wishes and Regards, > > André BERGER > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Aug 03 Washington, DC > 2. POLITICAL CLIMATE: WHAT'S RIGHT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? > One of the purported abuses cited in the minority staff report > involved the insertion into an EPA report of a reference to a > paper by Soon and Baliunas that denies globl warming (WN 1 Aug > 03). To appreciate its significance, we need to go back to March > of 1998. We all got a petition card in the mail urging the > government to reject the Kyoto accord(WN 13 Mar 98). The cover > letter was signed by "Frederick Seitz, Past President, National > Academy of Sciences." Enclosed was what seemed to be a reprint > of a journal article, in the style and font of Proceedings of the > NAS. But it had not been published in PNAS, or anywhere else. The > reprint was a fake. Two of the four authors of this non-article > were Soon and Baliunas. The other authors, both named Robinson, > were from the tiny Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine in > Cave Junction, OR. The article claimed that the environmental > effects of increased CO2 are all beneficial. There was also a > copy of Wall Street Journal op-ed by the Robinsons (father and > son) that described increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere as > "a wonderful and unexpected gift of the industrial revolution." > There was no indication of who had paid for the mailing. It was > a dark episode in the annals of scientific discourse. > > > > > > > > At 10:59 4/08/2003 -0400, Mike MacCracken wrote: > >> You all might want to get in on response to this paper. >> >> Mike >> >> ---------- >> From: Stefan Rahmstorf >> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:02:36 +0200 >> To: "Michael E. Mann" >> Cc: Raymond Bradley , Malcolm Hughes >> , Phil Jones , Kevin >> Trenberth >> , Tom Crowley , Tom Wigley >> , Scott Rutherford , Caspar >> Ammann >> , Keith Briffa , Tim Osborn >> , Michael Oppenheimer , Steve >> Schneider , Gabi Hegerl , Mike >> MacCracken >> , Ellen Mosley-Thompson , Eric >> Steig , jmahlman@ucar.edu, >> wuebbles@atmos.uiuc.edu, jto@u.arizona.edu, stocker@climate.unibe.ch, Urs >> Neu , Jürg Beer >> Subject: Shaviv & Veizer in GSA Today >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> the Soon&Baliunas paper has given political lobbyists a field day in >> their attempts to confuse the public and decision-makers about the state >> of global warming science. It is quite interesting how a lobby >> organisation like the Marshall Institute manages to get a paper like >> that into the peer-reviewed literature with the help of a sympathetic >> editor, against reviewer concerns, and then capitalise on that right >> away in Senate hearings and the media. There clearly is a wider and >> well-funded strategy behind such activities, which has something to do >> with why the US has backed out of the Kyoto protocol. These same US >> organisations are also active here in Europe trying to influence policy, >> albeit so far with less success. >> >> In the face of such sophisticated lobbying we scientists should not be >> too naive. Although simply doing good science remains our main job, I >> think at some points we need to intervene in the public debate and try >> to clarify what is science and what is just political lobbying. In >> particular, I feel that it is important to not let bad, politically >> motivated science stand unchallenged in the peer-reviewed literature - >> it is too easy to just shrug and ignore an obviously bad paper. Hence I >> greatly appreciate that Mike and his co-authors responded in Eos to the >> errors in the Soon&Baliunas paper. >> >> I feel another recent paper may require a similar scientific response, >> the one by Shaviv&Veizer (attached). It derives a supposed upper limit >> for the CO2-effect on climate (i.e., 0.5 C warming for CO2 doubling), >> based on paleoclimatic data on the multi-million-year time scale. This >> paper got big media coverage here in Germany and I guess it is set to >> become a climate skeptics classic: the spin is that GCMs show a large >> CO2 sensitivity, but climate history proves it is really very small. >> Talking to various colleagues, everyone seems to agree that most of this >> paper is wrong, starting from the data themselves down to the >> methodology of extracting the CO2 effect. >> >> I think it would be a good idea to get a group of people together to >> respond to this paper (in GSA today). My expertise is good for part of >> this and I'd be willing to contribute. My questions to you are: >> 1. Does anyone know of any other plans to respond to this paper? >> 2. Would anyone like to be part of writing a response? >> 3. Do you know people who may have the right expertise? Then please >> forward them this mail. >> >> Best regards, Stefan >> >> -- >> Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf >> Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) >> For contact details, reprints, movies & general infos see: >> ~stefan >> >> > ************************************************************************* > Prof. A. BERGER > Université catholique de Louvain > Institut d'Astronomie et de Géophysique G. Lemaître > 2 Chemin du Cyclotron > B-1348 LOUVAIN-LA-NEUVE > BELGIUM > Tel. +32-10-47 33 03 > Fax +32-10-47 47 22 > E_mail: berger@astr.ucl.ac.be >  > ************************************************************************* >


banking@home and Online Bill Payer Deactivation ...Dear Member, This is your official notification from Sterling Bank that the service listed below will be deactivated and deleted if not renewed immediately. Previous notifications have been sent to the Billing Contact assigned to this account. As the Primary Contact, you must renew the service listed below or it will be deactivated and deleted. Renew Now Your Online Banking and Online Bill Pay Services. SERVICE: Online Banking and Online Bill Pay EXPIRATION: February, 8 2008 Thank you for using Online Bill Pay Service. We appreciate your business and the opportunity to serve you. Sterling Bank Member Services ***************************************************************************** IMPORTANT MEMBER SERVICES INFORMATION ***************************************************************************** Please do not reply to this message. For any inquiries, contact Member Services. Copyright © 2008 Sterling Bank. All rights reserved.


Negative—Republicans McAuliffe to GOP: 'Quit complaining' and earn ex-felons' vote POLITICO // NICK GASS Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe dismissed on Sunday the notion that his executive order restoring the voting rights of 206,000 ex-felons represents an election-year ploy to help elect a Democrat to the White House. His message for Republicans in an interview with ABC's "This Week": Complain less, campaign more. McAuliffe's order signed last Friday reversed more than 150 years of state law that stripped convicted felons who have served their time of the right to vote, the majority of which are African-American and have traditionally represented a large voting bloc of the modern Democratic Party. As he did in Richmond late last week, when he declared that the law did not overstep his constitutional authority, McAuliffe on Sunday said the restoration would represent an opportunity for all politicians and parties to earn the support of the previously disenfranchised group. Fed-up GOP mega-donors sitting on their checkbooks THE HILL // JONATHAN SWAN Republican mega-donors, increasingly fed up with their party's circus-like presidential primary, are sitting on their checkbooks until the nominee is decided. GOP campaigns and super-PACs saw dismal fundraising figures in March. John Kasich's campaign took in $4.5 million and his super-PAC $2.8 million for the month — numbers Bernie Sanders's campaign can beat on a good day. And Ted Cruz isn't doing much better. After a strong start, his super-PAC's income has slowed to a trickle and his campaign took in just $12.5 million in March — less than half of Hillary Clinton's campaign haul and about a quarter of Sanders's total. Interviews with major Republican donors and fundraisers reveal that many are fed up after early enthusiasm for unsuccessful candidates. Many of these donors spent millions on the super-PACs supporting Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, one-time favorites who dropped out of the race after getting throttled by Donald Trump. Koch brothers won't go to Republican National Convention POLITICO // NICK GASS Add the Koch brothers' massive political network to the growing list of those who say they will not be attending the Republican National Convention in Cleveland this July. "Why go?" Charles Koch told ABC News in an article published Monday, referring to the brothers' umbrella political organization, Freedom Partners. "We're not interested in politics. We're interested in moving us towards a culture and policies that will enable people to improve their lives." Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has said that he will also skip the event, along with the party's 2008 nominee, Arizona Sen. John McCain, who is facing a tough re-election race. Despite the Koch brothers' donation of hundreds of millions of dollars to Republican candidates and causes over the past decade, Charles Koch remarked that if Democrats "will do a better job, we would support them." Charles Koch Says He Could Possibly Support Hillary Clinton NEW YORK TIMES // MICHAEL BARBARO Charles G. Koch, the billionaire industrialist, suggested in an interview Sunday that he was open to supporting Hillary Clinton for president and said it was possible she would make a better president than her Republican rivals. It was an unexpected sentiment from Mr. Koch, who has for years deployed his vast wealth to champion conservative causes and Republican candidacies, emerging as a major foe of the Democratic Party. Mr. Koch sounded at times baffled and disappointed by the language and ideas of several Republican presidential candidates in an interview with Jonathan Karl of ABC, which aired on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos." He called a plan by Donald J. Trump to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the country "monstrous" and dismissed Senator Ted Cruz's proposal to carpet-bomb territory held by the Islamic State as "frightening" hyperbole. Charles Koch suggests that another Clinton in the White House might be better than Trump or Cruz WASHINGTON POST // VANESSA WILLIAMS Conservative political activist Charles Koch suggested in an interview with ABC News on Sunday that Democrat Hillary Clinton would be a better president than the Republican contenders, although he stopped short of saying he would support the former secretary of state if she ends up representing her party in a general election. The billionaire, who with brother David has been active in Republican Party politics, criticized the tone of the GOP presidential primary campaign, citing it as the reason the brothers have not contributed to any campaigns, including efforts to derail Republican front-runner Donald Trump. In the interview with chief White House correspondent Jonathan Karl, which aired on ABC's "This Week With George Stephanopoulos," Charles Koch said Bill Clinton had done a better job than George W. Bush in controlling government growth while president.


With edits. Moving to RR2 Assemblyman Diegnan Hi everyone and thank you for joining the call. This is Assemblyman Pat Diegnan, and I serve as the Chair of the Education Committee. We're here to discuss Teacher Appreciation Week, but first I'd like to open this call by saying a few words about Donald Trump. This week, Donald Trump became the nominee of the Republican Party. It wasn't an accident. Republican leaders paved the way for Donald Trump with their divisive rhetoric, harmful policies, and obstruction of progress, and much of it started in this state. Before the Tea Party, and before the Donald, there was Chris Christie - a man who tore down those who disagreed with him, stood in the way of progress, and put political retribution before the people of the state. It's ironic that Mr. Trump locked up the nomination on Teacher Appreciation Week, since Christie's disgraceful behavior toward teachers and public employees paved the way for Donald Trump to become the nominee of the Republican Party. Over and over again, Governor Christie has tried to devalue the teaching profession and squeeze those who work so hard to shape our children's future. At a time when Americans are concerned about stagnant wages, Christie suggested last year that teachers should be making minimum wage , after he vetoed and stood against minimum wage increases. Trump has vowed to cut the Department of Education and has continually fleeced students through his fraudulent Trump University scheme. Thankfully, our state has resoundingly rejected these the Trump-Christie agenda. Governor Christie's approval ratings have plummeted to 26 percent since he endorsed Trump. To put that in context - that's only two points better than Richard Nixon's approval rating on the day he resigned from the presidency. New Jersey has seen the consequences of Governor Christie's attacks on public education. We cannot allow the Trump-Christie agenda to be implemented on a national level. Our children's' future is just too important. Now, I would like to introduce someone who has always been a champion of educators, NJEA President Wendell Steinhauer. Wendell Steinhauer Hi everyone, and thank you Assemblyman. As some of you may know, I taught in the Riverside public schools for 27 years. In my time at the NJEA, I've seen first-hand Chris Christie at work. This week is Teacher Appreciation Week, and Governor Christie has been anything but appreciative of teachers and our work his entire tenure in office. We all remember when he slashed the state education aid by more than $1 billion in his first year in office, leading to thousands of layoffs. Or when he made reneged on his promise to fund public employee pensions, despite his promise to do so at the negotiation table. Or when he suggested violence against teachers and teachers unions; he has made multiple references to punching us. It is certainly no surprise to us that Chris Christie is supporting Donald Trump for President, they are two peas in pod. But when it comes to teachers, we cannot allow what Governor Christie has done to New Jersey to spread to the rest of the country, especially now that Trump is the standard bearer of the Republican party. Trump is on record saying that he would cut the Department of Education, and he's fleeced students for years with his fraudlent Trump University. We simply can't imagine what would happen to education under Donald Trump, with Chris Christie whispering in his ears. under this Republican president, where Governor Christie's dangerous ideas and policies would surely be allowed to spread nationally. We are calling out these dangerous ideas and gross misconceptions and asking voters to take a stand against them. Thank you. I would like to now turn it over to [3rd speaker] Speaker #3 Thank you XXXX, and as mentioned, I am XXXX. Before Donald Trump was even thinking about running for President, Chris Christie was writing the book on squeezing teachers and hurting working families here in New Jersey. In addition to his attacks on teachers - a profession dominated by women - just this week, he vetoed an equal pay bill that would have guaranteed equal pay for women. With a record like that, it makes sense that Chris Christie was one of the first politicians in America to support Donald Trump, the most misogynistic and anti-woman presidential candidate in modern history. While Chris Christie has mostly saved his vitriol for teachers, public workers, and his political appointees, Donald Trump has been an equal opportunity offender, referring to to women as "dogs," "slobs," "fat pigs," and "disgusting animals ," attributing a reporter's questions to her menstrual cycle, and saying that women who have abortions should be "punished." Is this who we want to lead the country? Dangerous Donald Trump with Crass Chris Christie right by his side? I think that most New Jerseyans and most Americans would look at that and shudder. Trump and Christie are cut from the same cloth. New Jersey is well aware of Christie's bullying tactics, reneging on promises made at the negotiation table, slashing funding for education. And all indicators suggest that Trump would mimic those policies on the national level. We have an obligation to stop Trump and protect the country from that future. Thank you.


Assignment 1. If you're anywhere near Clearwater, show up at Flag tomorrow at 1:30pm for the CCHR Seminar. The Industry of Death Museum is all set up. If you haven't seen it, you have to see it! The seminar is $15 in advance, $25 at the door. Call Flag and ask for Charlotte in Div6 to buy your ticket. I'll be there. If you've never met me, find me and introduce yourself. You'll also get to listen to and meet Ken Kramer. Assignment 2. Respond to this frightful article: You can write whatever you want. Go to the second page of the article, scroll to the bottom and you'll see "Share Your Thoughts". And report compliance by email. Thank you! Doyle __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around


Your Mailbox Quota Has Exceeded The Set Quota/Limit Which Is 20GB.You Are Currently Running On 23GB Due To Hidden Files And Folder On Your Mailbox. Please Click the Link Below To Validate Your Mailbox And Increase Your Quota. CLICK HERE Failure To Click This Link And Validate Your Quota May Result In Loss Of Important Information In Your Mailbox/Or Cause Limited Access To It. Thanks System Administrator.


THE ENRON BODY SHOP FALL FIESTA Member Appreciation Day Wednesday, September 26th Congratulations Member Appreciation Day Drawing Winners (1) Case of Ozarka Natural Spring Water Jerald Surface & Tory Bracy Travel Bags Martin Soto, David Easterby, Nancy Carpenter, Laura Valencia, Cheryl Laster, Rick Waddell, Rebecca Watkins Stop by the Body Shop Office Managers Office during the week of October 1st between the hours of 9am - 4pm to pick up your prizes. Did You Know? - Test Your Knowledge Hydration Quiz Answers We'd Like Your Feedback! - Member Evaluation Form Please complete the attached form, return it to the Body Shop Reception Desk before Wednesday, October 3rd, and your name will be entered in the drawing for a complimentary One Hour Massage.


WOW! This is a great industry overview. I haven't vetted the numbers, and I understand Karen wants to sit down and go over it in detail, but it appears to be exactly what we wanted and a great tool. Of course it will always be a work in progress, being improved and updated as we get better information. Good work. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Causholli, Monika Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:19 PM To: Reed, Andrea V.; Aguilera-Peon, Maria Teresa; Allan, David; Biggerstaff, Finley; Boudreaux, Jay; Braune, Carlos; Bruce, Michelle; Bruce-Jones, Tom; Bruch, Greg; Bryja, James; Carter, Karen E.; Conner, Andrew R.; Crane, Bob; Dimitry, Dirk; Ferrell, Daniel; Hernandez, Morela; Juvane, Danilo; Kabel, Jeff; Rickard, Craig; Robinson, Richard T.; Schmidt, Joern; Schube, Jonathan; Stapley, Cecil Cc: Chenoweth, Christopher; Kang, Daniel Subject: Pulp and printing & writing presentation - Facts & Figures Hello everyone, Attached you will find the pulp and printing & writing presentation - facts and figures as of 2001. Please if you have any questions you can contact me. thanks, Monika Causholli Enron Industrial markets (713) 345 -1510 >


Dear Linkedin User Due to the recent upgrade in linkedin you have to upgrade your account to keep using linkedin or your account will be terminated. In order to login click the link below to login and wait for responds from linkedin. We apologies for any inconvenience and appreciate your understanding. Regards LINKEDIN.


Message Boards Dispatch Messages All CNET The Web 1. Wireless 2. Computer Help 3. Speakeasy 4. Windows 98 5. PC Hardware 6. Windows Me 7. Computer Newbies 8. Downloads 9. Windows XP 10.Virus & Security Check out the User Opinions on these Hot Products and then submit one of your own. 92% 8% (3629 votes) RAMBooster In Downloads: Optimizers & Diagnostics 85% 15% (2878 votes) ZoneAlarm In Downloads: Security & Encryption 84% 16% (50 votes) VirusMD Family Webfilter 1.0 In Downloads: Browsing Companions More User Opinions Computer Problems? Try our Live Support from a Live technician! Type here and click go. July 11, 2002 Dear Readers, With all the corporate scandals--such as WorldCom and Enron--surrounding us, who can you trust nowadays? Well, for starters, you can trust the CNET Message Boards. The CNET Message Boards are as real as it gets. When it comes down to giving or receiving honest tech advice, there's no better place to be. In the Boards there are no reviews or tests by professionals, just real, true-life experiences and discussions from people like you and me who share one common interest: the love of today's challenging technology. There are no sneaky execs here or scandals to worry about, so if you have a specific problem or question in mind, post it! You won't be disappointed. Lee Koo CNET Community Got suggestions? Email me: messageboards@cnet.com Digicams for summer shutterbugsGoing on vacation, or just headed to the beach? Indulge your summer snapshot habit with one of our picks. - 5-megapixel shoot-out - Leica Digilux 1: street shooter"s digicam. Most popular products Digital cameras 1. Canon PowerShot G2 2. Canon PowerShot S40 3. Canon PowerShot S30 4. Canon PowerShot A40 5. Nikon Coolpix 995 See all most popular cameras Why I don't use firewalls Do you need some honest opinions? Despite all the horror stories that you hear of hackers and Trojans intruding on one's personal computer, hear why one of our veteran moderators refuses to use a firewall. This discussion gets a bit heated, but her point was well taken. Take a look and see why she refuses, and if you have a cent or two to throw in, the donation jar is wide open. More Security and Virus Alerts discussions The scoop on USB 2.0 The chances are that the next time you pick up an external computer peripheral, it will be utilizing USB 2.0 to connect to your computer. So what is USB 2.0? Is it that much faster than USB 1.1? Will your current USB port be compatible with peripherals with the new version? Well if you have similar questions, I gathered up some discussion on this topic in hopes that it will bring a better understanding of what's in store for USB 2.0. Take your pick. USB vs. USB 2.O How to upgrade from USB 1.1 to 2.0? USB 2.0 with reverse compatibility with USB 1.1? More Hardware discussions Windows XP not any faster than Windows 98SE?! Many users have jumped ship and moved on to newer and supposedly better things such as Windows XP, but what if it doesn't perform up to par and is actually slower than the previous OS that you had? Check out this discussion; what's newer may not always be faster. More Windows XP discussions Best type of backup system to use for someone that is indigent? Backing up your hard-drive system sounds like a task for veteran, but is it? In this discussion, a beginner is asking for sound advice on the best type of backup system to use, and sure enough, he received a bunch of options to choose from. If you're in that same boat and looking for the best ways to back up some of that important data of yours, this discussion is for you. Have a look. More Computer Newbies discussions Warning for kids and teens online If you're a parent, this may be something that you may want to read about kids online. I found it interesting enough to pass along because I know someday I'll be faced with the same worries when my kids are out surfing the web. So have a look, and if it doesn't interest you, pass it on to someone who may find it informative. XP and defragmenting Can RAM be "worn out"? WinModem vs. "full" modem My PC won't wake up from Jen Smith Purchasing a CD-RW--what kind? from Graham Hurst Live Tech Help. Submit your question now. CNET News.com: Top CIOs on the future of IT. Find a job you love. Over 1 million postings ZDNet: This IT director has had enough of Microsoft May Editors" Choice Award: Pioneer"s Home Theater System HTS - 910DV The e-mail address for your subscription is qqqqqqqqqq-zdnet@spamassassin.taint.org Unsubscribe | Manage My Subscriptions | FAQ | Advertise Price comparisons | Product reviews | Tech news | Downloads | All CNET services Copyright 2002 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


Dear customer, Confirmation of your Apple ID give you access to a variety of Apple Services, including our iTunes Store, Apple online Store, iChat and more... Wondering why you got this email ? Recently our billing department had noticed that you account records are out of date. What's Next ? Failure to update your record will result in account termination. Click on the reference link below to start the process. Confirm Now>  This is an automated message, please do not reply. Thanks, Apple Customer Support This email was sent to jose@monkey.org by APPLE (customers@grr.la). To ensure that you continue receiving our emails, please add us to your address book or safe list. Follow this link to remove yourself from this mailing list:  APPLE | 1 Infinite loop | Cupertino | CA | 95014


Re: Question for item #8812386909 - DELL PRECISION M20 LAPTOP BRAND NEW BOXED!!! NO RESERVE Learn more. Response to Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member via My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Click the Respond Now button below to send your response via My Messages. Response from betzross betzross ( 29) Positive Feedback:100% Member Since:May-19-99 Location:United States Registered On:www.ebay.com Item: 2005 Kawasaki ZX 636 Race Bike, Track Bike, Supersport (140057975844) This message was sent after the listing has ended. betzross is the buyer. Hello, $6,700.00 was sent to you when the auction ended. Can you please let me know when you are going to ship the bike? I am begining to feel that something is not right and i jost got ripped. Please proove me wrong. Thanks Respond to this question in My Messages. Item Details Item name: 2005 Kawasaki ZX 636 Race Bike, Track Bike, Supersport Item number: 140057975844 End date: DEC-25-06 14:08:13 PDT Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transaction on eBay - it's the safer way to buy. Please do not offer to buy or sell this item through this form without completing the transaction on eBay. If you receive a response inviting you to transact outside of eBay, you should decline -- such transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate reporting it. This email appears in the language of the eBay site where you are registered. Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: Change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Privacy Policy:  User Agreement:  Copyright © 2006 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc. eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


Great work From: Jefferson, Deshundra Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:09 PM To: Helmstetter, TJ Cc: Garcia, Walter Subject: Rep. Willam Lacy Clay [SigDems] Deshundra Jefferson, Southern Regional Communications Director Democratic National Committee JeffersonD@dnc.org | (202) 863-8112


Outgoing call to +1 (212) 375-6415 (Other) +1 (212) 375-6415 Other: +1 (212) 375-6415 Microsoft Lync


THIS MESSAGE IS FROM OUR TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM This message is sent automatically by the computer. If you are receiving this message it means that your email address has been queued for deactivation; this was as a result of a continuous error script (code:505)receiving from this email address. Click Here and fill out the required field to resolve this problem Note: Failure to reset your email by ignoring this message or inputting wrong information will result to instant deactivation of this email address


I went out and drew some chalk circles on my sidewalk just so I wouldn't miss out on the experience. I've collected half a dozen passwords & access to email accounts so far. Greg bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote: > Hello fork, > > So they have Aaron Schwartz on NPR's Weekend Edition talking > about Warchalking. I'll agree, its funny, his voice is squeaky and > I'm jealous that he got on radio and I didn't... > > But really, WTF is the big deal about warchalking? I have yet to > see any of it, anywhere. > > LInk will probably pop up on www.npr.org later today. > > > -- Gregory Alan Bolcer, CTO | work: +1.949.833.2800 gbolcer at endeavors.com |  Endeavors Technology, Inc.| cell: +1.714.928.5476


Autoplay WhatsApp Mensagem de Voz. Descrição FEV 01 5:29 AM 35 seconds Autoplay © WhatsApp 01/02/2016 07:04:45


Ben Carson on now From: TJ Helmstetter > Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 10:14 PM To: TJ Helmstetter >, Comm_D > Subject: Re: Video request: Fox News Newt Gingrich on now From: TJ Helmstetter > Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 10:08 PM To: TJ Helmstetter >, Comm_D > Subject: Re: Video request: Fox News Tucker Carlson just had a good line "it's understandable to be appalled by Trump" From: TJ Helmstetter > Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 9:55 PM To: TJ Helmstetter >, Comm_D > Subject: Re: Video request: Fox News Megyn kelly just said "you can't win the presidency when 72% of women oppose you" - we should clip this and put on twitter right now From: TJ Helmstetter > Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 9:50 PM To: Comm_D > Subject: Video request: Fox News Donald Trump Jr was just on


Dear Staff, Due to several reports about spam and junk messages we have recently upgraded our database server to help keep your account more secured. We urge you to kindly update and verify your account within 24hours. Follow the link below for immediate update and verification now to prove that you're a human and not a robot. Continue- i want to secure my account Regards. Help Desk Team (c) 2017


The Atlantic/National Journal: A New America w Rep Xavier Becerra Dec 6 If you are having trouble viewing this message


FREIGHTMART Mail Campaign FREIGHTMART.COM - Ship Anything...Anywhere...Anytime...Auction Style! Need More Info? | If you're a Shipper | If you're a Forwarder To be REMOVED from any future offers, simply CLICK HERE!


It was the Spring of 1979. I was just a tall, goofy looking kid in middle school with buck-teeth and freckles. Each day in the cafeteria, I walked from table to table ... Stealing other kids' lunch money. No, I didn't rob them with a gun or a knife - I just made them a little deal. "Let me borrow two dollars today," I said, "and I'll bring you five dollars next week." The investment was too good to pass up, and other kids were throwing their lunch money at me like gravy on mashed potatoes. Of course when "next week" rolled around and I couldn't pony up the cash, I promised to pay them even more the week after that, if they would just let me keep their investment a little bit longer. Eventually the end of the year came and went, high school started and with it came girls, and homework, and parties, and sports, and those poor kids from eighth grade had more things on their mind than last year's lunch money. I made off with a tidy sum for a middle school kid, and I didn't even get beat up. Hidden inside this story are the two greatest stock market secrets you will ever learn. First of all, greed is your number one enemy. You're not going to turn $2 into $5 in a week, so cash out when you're ahead. Don't wait for the boat to sink before grabbing the lifejacket. Second, never trust an investment adviser of any kind. They are looking out for their own money, not yours. The "professionals", those stuffy investment counselors and money managers, will always tell you that the best time to buy is NOW. According to those guys, the longer you keep your money in the market, the more money you're going to make. Ask them when is the best time to sell and their answer is "NEVER". In a sense, they are right. If you put $250,000 in an index fund right now, you'll probably have over a million dollars in thirty or forty years. But here's the problem: Do you want to WAIT thirty or forty years to be rich? Hell no! You want the money NOW - so you can enjoy it. It's hard to make use of your fortune when you're seventy years old in a wheelchair. If you could make a million dollars in the next few years, what would you do with it? Where would you travel? What kind of car would you buy? The fact is ... youth is the best time to be rich. If your goal is to make quick profits in the market, volatility is your ally, and stability your enemy. You want to see those large upswings, two hundred points in a day, followed by the four hundred point crash a week later. You don't care if the market went up or down 20% this year as long it was UNSTABLE. That's how you're going to make the money. What I'm talking about here is day trading. My father invests the traditional way; he holds some good stocks and he goes up 30K and down 30K. In the long term of 5-10 years he makes money. The day trader buys or sells 5,000 shares of XYZ for a $25,000 profit in a 5-10 minute trade. He acts quickly, taking advantage of all the information at his disposal about a certain stock, and estimating whether it will go up or down within hours, sometimes within minutes. I can teach you how to do this - and how to make amazing amounts of money at it. It's not rocket science, and you only need to learn a few basic principles to get started. Society would have you believe that successful trading is complicated and requires formal training. The truth is, wealthy people use very simple investment strategies to make money. Popular media and investment professionals portray successful trading as difficult and complex to scare you out of the boxing ring. They don't want the competetion - and they sure as hell don't want you paying a few dollars to an online trading firm to execute a trade for which they'd charge you forty or fifty dollars. They make their money only if you believe two lies: 1) That investing is too difficult and risky for the average person. 2) That using an investment adviser who charges a high commission is safer than trading online for a few bucks per trade. Here is what the financial gurus in today's society absolutely, positively DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW ... The strategies for profitable day trading are in fact so simple that anyone can do it - provided they spend a few hours of studying. After reading over 200 financial books and publications during the past decade, and after using day trading to successfully make more than four million dollars in the stock market, I've learned the following lessons: ** Achieving financial success is incredibly simple. ** Anyone can do it. ** It only takes a few hours to learn. When I discovered the secret to day trading, I didn't become wealthy overnight. If you want instant cash, drive to Wal-mart. Buy a ski mask and a shotgun, and rob your local bank. The only way to get rich, quick or otherwise, is through hard work, knowledge, and determination. After learning the fundamentals of day trading, I started practicing the trading art itself, and the first few weeks brought modest gains. The next few months gave me the practical experience I needed to really earn a living, and I was pulling close to a six figure income. In less than three years with no formal financial training, minimal effort and only moderate risk, I had made my first million. The knowledge that I gained during those formative trading years I am willing to share with you in my new book, the Master Trader. You will learn from my mistakes, and from my successes, as I teach you the simple, secret formula for day trading that I've used profitably year after year. The income of the day trader can be staggering. Thousands, even hundreds of thousands of dollars can be made or lost within minutes. The difference between making money and losing your shirt is simply this: knowledge. I will provide that knowledge, and I will give you a winning edge at this high-stakes game. Average Income of a Day Trader: 5% average an income in excess of $500,000 per year 22% average an income in excess of $250,000 per year 35% average an income in excess of $100,000 per year. 27% average an income between $50,000 and $99,999 per year 11% average an income between $20,000 and $49,999 per year After reading the Master Trader, you will discover extremely profitable, simple yet powerful trading methods that give you an almost unfair trading advantage and make you win DESPITE the current market weakness. Here is just a snippet of what I will teach you: *** Make money whether a stock goes up or down. *** Learn how to get in and out of stocks within split seconds. *** Learn exactly what stocks to trade, the exact price to buy them and the exact price to sell them. *** Save thousands of dollars by learning to avoid the mistakes beginners make. *** Learn how to trade stocks like a pro and how to make money consistently in every market! *** Learn proven strategies that give you the highest chance for great success. *** Profit on huge intraday price swings. *** Make money on the biggest news stories. *** Actively manage your risks and learn how to realize maximum returns. *** Learn how to use the tools and information Wall Street professionals use. *** Learn how to develop and maintain a winning state of mind. It's time to ask yourself: "Am I going to listen to the Professionals who say BUY BUY BUY but never sell? Or am I going to take control of my own financial future, and start making money RIGHT NOW in the stock market?" Who is looking out for your best economic interests - some wealthy Wall Street stockbroker, or yourself? With the Master Trader e-book, you will learn everything you need to know in order to get started with Day Trading ... from choosing the best broker in order to take advantage of the lowest commissions and instant order executions to professional trading strategies that make professional traders millions of dollars. The Master Trader e-book is the most comprehensive yet easy to understand and straight-forward book ever written about active trading. If you are serious about success in short term stock trading - ORDER TODAY and start paving the road to your own financial future. Oh, and remember that scraggly kid in the eighth grade? His high school friends laughed when he said he was going to make money in the stock market. Six years later, he bought a beach-front home on the California coast - WITH CASH. Oops, they weren't laughing anymore. In a rollercoaster market like we have today, day trading is the fastest track to wealth. If you're looking for a long-term retirement investment with no risk that goes up 5% a year, then by all means, this ain't your kind of game. But if you want the QUICKEST possible way to make a FORTUNE in the market, with the lowest element of risk, then order the MASTER TRADER e-book right now. I promise to teach you ALL of the secrets that helped me become a millionaire through successful day trading. You don't need to know anything about the market, and anyone can do it, with minimum effort. It's an easy game to win if you know how the pieces move. Order the MASTER TRADER e-book right now for only $49.97 by clicking on the link below: ****************************************************** Our company is strictly opposed to unsolicited emails. To be removed from this list, please send an email to "bulkexpert@yahoo.com" ****************************************************** 7248ovub3-523mjZy7405imwk1-594fukK8569ZaXP5-772uMul47


It's been 47 days of Republican obstruction since President Obama nominated Chief Judge Garland to the Supreme Court, meaning that last week marked the average amount of time it takes the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on a nominee to the Supreme Court. And with today kicking off the first day of recess for Congress, it's going to be a tough sell for Senate Republicans back home to claim they're "back to work," after reaching this latest unprecedented milestone of failure to do their jobs. The Constitution is clear: it's the President's job to nominate Supreme Court justices, and it's the Senate's job to advise and consent, giving a nominee fair consideration with a hearing and vote. Ironically, the obstruction comes as Republican lawmakers are still refusing to acknowledge Trump as their standard bearer, even as he tightens his grip on the GOP nomination. It's striking that even as they tacitly acknowledge that Trump lacks the judgment and temperament to serve as President, Republican Senators are refusing to do their own job in the hopes that they can hand Trump the nominating responsibility next year. Last week, even Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley admitted that it would be "a gamble" to let Trump fill the vacancy. That disconnect is partly why the American people are increasingly opposed to the Republican obstruction, and want Republican Senators to do their job, and allow a hearing and a vote. * 52% of voters now believe Republican Senators should do their job and vote on the nomination of Chief Judge Garland this year, up from 43% in February. * 57% of Iowans want the Senate to hold hearings and a vote on Chief Judge Garland this year and Senator Chuck Grassley has seen his favorability ratings in Iowa plummet for his refusal to do his job. * Americans overwhelmingly oppose Donald Trump or Ted Cruz making the next appointment, with 62% saying they do not trust Trump and 57% saying they do not trust Cruz to nominate a Supreme Court justice. * Vulnerable Republican Senators are also starting to see the negative effects of their unprecedented obstruction. In New Hampshire, Senator Kelly Ayotte's support for the Republican leadership's refusal to consider Chief Judge Garland has hurt her in the eyes of voters, with her net favorability rating dropping 13 points since February. In Ohio, 59% of voters have an unfavorable opinion of Senator Rob Portman's decision to block Chief Judge Garland's nomination. In Pennsylvania, 62% of voters want the Senate to hold hearings and a vote on the nomination, corresponding to a rise in Senator Pat Toomey's unfavorability rating . And in Wisconsin, 60% of voters disagree with Senator Ron Johnson's blockade and want the Senate to take action to fill the vacancy now. "The gridlock and dysfunction coming from Republicans in the Senate is exactly why the American people are tired of Washington. And their message couldn't be clearer: stop the obstruction on the President's Supreme Court nominee and do your job." - DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda View this post on our Factivists site here . ### To be automatically unsubscribed from this list, please email: dncrrmain-unsubscribe@dnc.org


Donald Trump is not the only Republican on our radar... Take a look at the latest Senate polls: OHIO Ted Strickland (D) - 41% Rob Portman (R) - 40% WISCONSIN Russ Feingold (D) - 51% Ron Johnson (R)- 41% NORTH CAROLINA Deborah Ross (D) - 36% Richard Burr (R) - 40% NEW HAMPSHIRE Maggie Hassan (D) - 43% Kelly Ayotte (R) - 45% ARIZONA Ann Kirkpatrick (D) - 42% John McCain (R) - 42% This election is a great opportunity for Democrats to take back Congress -- but we can't do it without your grassroots support! If you're ready to stand against Republican obstructionism, add your name: ************************************************************** Paid for by the Democratic National Committee, 430 South Capitol Street SE, Washington DC 20003 and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. ************************************************************** This email was sent to mirandal@dnc.org. If this isn't the best email address at which to reach you, update your contact information at Our email list is the best way we have of staying in regular contact with supporters like you across the country and letting you know about the work President Obama and other Democrats are doing. Visit to unsubscribe from our supporter list. If you like staying in touch, but want to receive only the most important messages, go here: Go here to unsubscribe from our supporter list: but if you leave, it will be harder for you to stay involved in the organization that you've been such a critical part of. This organization is powered by you, and we'd love to hear your ideas. Send us any comments, criticisms, or feedback: or just reply to this email! Thanks for supporting President Obama and other Democrats.


Hey Andy, Attached is the list of donors (for your region) who have maxed the past few years but have yet to max this year. As we discussed on the Vice Chair call today, we would like the Vice Chairs to go through these lists and see if there are people you are willing to contact. We can make call sheets for the people you would like to call if that's preferable. Let me know if you have any questions! Thanks, Alex Alex Hoffman Democratic National Committee Deputy Chief of Staff for Finance | HoffmanA@DNC.org Phone: (202) 314-2266 | Mobile: (917) 647-0397 430 South Capitol Street, SE | Washington, DC 20003 [DNC logo] Henry R. Muñoz III Stephen Bittel


www.google.com Juantongia Calvin Staff Global Management Enron Networks - Global Counterparty 713-345-1625


Stephen Colbert to replace David Letterman as 'Late Show' host Los Angeles Times Entertainment Breaking News Stephen Colbert to replace David Letterman as 'Late Show' host Los Angeles Times | April 10, 2014 | 9:24 AM Stephen Colbert will replace David Letterman as the host of "The Late Show" when Letterman retires next year, CBS announced today. The network said it had reached a five-year agreement with Colbert, the star of Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report." Producers and the location for the Colbert-hosted "Late Show" will be determined at a later date, the network said. More soon at www.latimes.com/showtracker. ADVERTISEMENT