Free Personal and Business Grants " Qualify for at least $25,000 in free grants money - Guaranteed! " Each day over One Million Dollars in Free Government Grants is given away to people just like you for a wide variety of Business And Personal Needs Dear Grant Seeker, In a moment, I'll tell you exactly HOW & WHERE to get Grants. This MONEY has to be given away, WHY not to YOU? You may be thinking, "How can I get some of this Free Grants Money" Maybe you think it's impossible to get free money? Let me tell you it's not impossible! It's a fact, ordinary people and businesses all across the United States are receiving millions of dollars from these Government and Private Foundation's everyday. Who Can Apply? ANYONE can apply for a Grant from 18 years old and up! Grants from $500.00 to $50,000.00 are possible! GRANTS don't have to be paid back, EVER! Claim your slice of the FREE American Pie. This money is not a loan, Trying to get money through a conventional bank can be very time consuming and requires a lot of paperwork, only to find out that you've been denied. These Government Agencies don't have to operate under the same stringent requirements that banks do. You decide how much money you need, as long as it's a lawful amount and meets with the Government Agencies criteria, the money is yours to keep and never has to be repaid. This money is non taxable & interest free. None of these programs require a credit check, collateral, security deposits or co-signers, you can apply even if you have a bankruptcy or bad credit, it doesn't matter, you as a tax payer and U.S. citizen are entitled to this money. There are currently over 1,400 Federal Programs, 24,000 State Programs, 30,000 Private Foundations and 20,000 Scholarship Programs available. This year over $30 Billion Dollars In Free personal and business Government Grants Money will be given away by Government Grants Agencies. Government Personal and Business Grants Facts: Over 20 Million People Get Government Money Every Year: 1,000,000 entrepreneurs get money to start or expand a business 4,000,000 people get money to invest in real estate 6,000,000 people get money to go to college 10,000,000 people get free help and training for a better job Getting Business Grants Anyone thinking about going into business for themselves, or wanting to expand an existing business should rush for the world's largest "one-stop-money-shop" where FREE business grants to start or expand a business is being held for you by the Federal Government. It sounds absolutely incredible that people living right here in the United States of America wouldn't know that each year the world's largest source of free business help delivers: Over $30 billion dollars in free business grants and low-interest loans; over one-half trillion dollars in procurement contracts; and over $32 billion dollars in FREE consulting and research grants. With an economy that remains unpredictable, and a need for even greater economic development on all fronts, the federal government is more willing than it ever has been before to give you the money you need to own your own business and become your own boss! In spite of the perception that people should not look to the government for help, the great government give-away programs have remained so incredibly huge that if each of the approximately 8 million businesses applied for an equal share, they would each receive over $70,000. Most people never apply for FREE Business Grants because they somehow feel it isn't for them, feel there's too much red-tape, or simply don't know who to contact.The fact is, however, that people from all walks of life do receive FREE GRANTS MONEY and other benefits from the government, and you should also. Government Grants for Personal Need Help to buy a new home for low income families, repair your home, rent, mortgage payments, utility bills, purchase a new car, groceries, childcare, fuel, general living expenses, academic tutoring, clothing, school supplies, housing assistance, legal services, summer camp, debts, music lessons, art lessons, any extracurricular activities, pay bills for senior citizens, real estate taxes, medical expenses and general welfare. If you or someone you know suffered a fire lose there are programs available to help in replacing necessities. Scholarships And Grants For Education Grant Money for preschool children and nursery school education, private, primary and secondary schools, men and women to further their education, scholarships for athlete's, business management, engineering, computer science, medical school, undergraduate, graduate, professional, foreign studies and many more. Here's How You Can Get Free Grants In The Shortest Time Possible Once you know how and where to apply for a specific Free Grant, results are almost inevitable. The government wants to give away this money. . . it is under congressional mandate to do so! These funds are made available to help you, the tax payer. All that's required from you is the proper presentation of your grant request. That's all. Announcing... "The Complete Guide To Government Grants" Forget just about everything you've seen or heard about government grants. What I've done is put together a complete blueprint for researching, locating and obtaining government grants. "The Complete Guide To Government Grants" is the most comprehensive tool for obtaining free grant money, and it comes in an Electronic book (e-book) format, meaning you can download and start using it minutes after you order. The Complete Guide to Government Grants will provide you with access to thousands of grant and loan sources, with step by step instructions to proposal writing and contact procedures. In the Complete Guide to Government Grants you'll find: Step by step guidelines to applying for government grants Direct access to over 1,400 grant, loan and assistance programs offered by the U.S. federal government. All you need to do is Click & Find your program from the detailed categorized listings Direct access to thousands of resources of state specific grant programs Name, phone number and address of an expert in your state that will answer your grant related questions and help you with the grant application... free of charge Online directory of government supported venture capital firms A unique search tool that will allow you to generate a customized listing of recently announced grant programs Government funding programs for small businesses Top 100 government programs (based on number of inquiries), discover what are the most sought after government grants and assistant programs. Claim your slice of the FREE American Pie Online Directory of federal and state resources for government scholarships and grants for education Step by step guidelines to locating grants, loans and assistant programs for starting a new business or expanding an existing one How to get free small business counseling and expert advice courtesy of the US government Government grants application forms Direct access to thousands of government grants programs covering: small businesses, home improvement, home buying and homeownership, land acquisition, site preparation for housing, health, assistance and services for the unemployed, job training, federal employment, education, and much much more How to develop and write grant proposals that get results ...Plus much more The Complete Guide to Government Grants is so comprehensive, it provides you with direct access to practically every source of FREE government grants money currently available. If you're an American citizen or resident, you are entitled to free grant money ranging from $500 to $250,000 or more. If you are Black you have already qualified for 15 programs, being Hispanic, you qualify for many programs. Being a Christian will get you into 20 programs, there are also many other programs available for different faiths, Jewish, Catholic. Not having any money, will get you into over 30 programs, 550 programs if you are unemployed, or underemployed. The list and sources are endless. You Are Eligible! This money is Absolutely Free and will be yours to use for any worthwhile purpose. Did you know you can apply for as many grants as you want? It's true, For instance, you could get a $65,000 grant to begin a weight loss business, get $8,800 in tuition to become a nurse or $35,000 to open up the day-care center, you've always dreamed of owning. And then, go out and apply for a grant to buy a home for you and your family. And once your new business starts doing well you could go out and get another grant for expansion of your business. The possibilities are endless. You Must Qualify For At Least $25,000 In Free Grants Money, Or Your Money Back! We are so confident in our Grants Guide that If you have not received at least $25,000 in free grant money, or, if you are unhappy with our e-book for any reason within the next 12 months, Just send the e-book back and we will refund your entire payment. NO QUESTIONS ASKED!! If you want to order, we insist you do so entirely at our risk. That is why the E-book comes with a... No Risk full year Money-Back Guarantee. There is absolutely NO RISK on your part with this 365 day guarantee. What we mean is we want you to order without feeling you might "get taken." Therefore, we want you to order this material today... read it, use it... and if for any reason you aren't completely satisfied, you not only can cancel, you should, for an immediate refund of your purchase price. You simply can't lose. Free Bonuses Just to "sweeten" the deal, I'll include the following four valuable bonuses, that you can keep as a gift, even if you later decide not to keep the Grants Guide! Free Bonus #1: A Fully Featured Grants Writing Tutorial Software Package THIS INFO ALONE IS WORTH THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS - I GUARANTEE YOU CAN PURCHASE A GRANTS CD OR INFO ANYWHERE, AND YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE THIS DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE THAT ACTUALLY SHOWS YOU HOW TO APPLY AND WHAT TO SAY, SO THAT YOU ARE ACCEPTED FOR A GRANT !!! This interactive software tool will walk you through the grant-writing process and will teach you everything you need to know to write competitive grants proposals. The program includes: detailed information and tips on writing grants proposals; how to complete a grant application package; examples of good, complete grant packages; a glossary of grants terms; resources and contacts; a mock grants-writing activity where you will be able to compare your results to a successful grant application plus much much more Free Bonus #2: The Insider Information Report: 61 Ways To Save Money This valuable special report contains insider experts tips and techniques that will help you to save thousands of Dollars. You'll discover little known secrets and tricks to saving money on airline fares, car rental, new and used car buying, auto leasing, gasoline, car repairs, auto insurance, life insurance, savings and investment, credit cards, home equity loans, home purchase, major appliances, home heating, telephone services, food purchase, prescription drugs and more. Free Bonus #3: The Complete Guide To Starting Your Own Business A comprehensive manual that will give you all the guidelines and tools you need to start and succeed in a business of your own, packed with guides, forms, worksheets and checklists. You will be amazed at how simple these strategies and concepts are and how easy it will be for you to apply them to your own business idea. Hundreds were sold separately at $40 each... you get it here for free. Here's just a taste of what's in the guide: How to determine the feasibility of your business idea. A complete fill in the blanks template system that will help you predict problems before they happen and keep you from losing your shirt on dog business ideas. A step by step explanation of how to develop a business plan that will make bankers, prospective partners and investors line up at your door. Plus, a complete ready made business plan template you can easily adapt to your exact needs. Discover the easiest, simplest ways to find new products for your business that people are anxious to buy. How to make money with your new idea or invention. Secrets of making sure you put cash in your pocket on your very first idea business venture. Complete, step by step instructions on how to plan and start a new business. This is must-know must-do information; ignore it and you stand a good chance to fail. You get specifically designed instructions for each of the following: a service business, a retail store, a home based business, a manufacturing company, and more. What nobody ever told you about raising venture capital money. Insider secrets of attracting investors, how to best construct your proposal, common mistakes and traps to avoid, and much more. Checklist for entering into a partnership. Keeps you from costly mistakes when forming a partnership. How to select a franchise business. A step by step guide to selecting a franchise that is best for you. A complete step-by-step organized program for cutting costs in your business. Clients of mine have achieved an average of 28% to 35% cost reduction with this technique, and you can too. Keep the money in your pocket with this one! What are the secrets behind constructing a results driven marketing plan? I will lead you step by step into developing a marketing plan that will drive your sales through the roof. A complete step by step guide guaranteed to help you increase your profits by up to 64%, I call it "The Profit Planning Guide". This is a simple, practical, common sense strategy, but amazingly enough, almost no one understands or uses it. Free Bonus #4: Guide To Home Business Success This is a fast, no-frills guide to starting and succeeding in a home based business. Here's just a taste of what's in the guide: Home business: is it for you? What are the secrets behind the people who have million dollar home based businesses? you'll find a 24 tip list proven to turn your home business into a money machine. Laws and regulations you must be aware of to avoid legal errors. Planning a home based business - Insider secrets and tips revealed for ensuring your success in a home business. Fundamentals of home business financial planning. Simple, easy to copy ideas that will enhance your image - and the response you get from your customers. Common problems in starting and managing a home based business - and how to solve them once and for all. Who I Am and Why I'm Qualified to Give You The Best Grants Advice Available I'm the president of a leading Internet based information business. I'm also the creator of "The Managing a Small Business CD-ROM" and the author of five books. I've been involved in obtaining grants and in small business for the past 23 years of my life, as a business coach, a manager of a consulting firm, a seminar leader and as the owner of five successful businesses. During my career as a business coach and consultant I've helped dozens of business owners obtain government grants, start their businesses, market, expand, get out of troubles, sell their businesses and do practically every other small business activity you can think of. The Guide presented here contains every tip, trick, technique and strategy I've learned during my 23 year career. You practically get my whole brain in a form of an E-book. How the Grants Guide is priced? The Complete Guide To Government Grants is normally priced at $50, but... ... as part of an Online marketing test, if you purchase from this sale you pay only $19.99 (that's 75% off ...plus, you still get the FREE valuable bonuses.) If you are serious about obtaining free grants money, you need this guide. Don't delay a moment longer. Order Now !!! P.S. The Complete Guide To Government Grants will make a huge difference. You risk nothing. The guide is not the original price of $50, but only $19.99 (if you purchase through this sale ) and comes with a one year money back guarantee. And you get four valuable free bonuses which you may keep regardless. Don't delay a moment longer, ORDER NOW !!!! Shipping and Handling is FREE since we will email you all of this info via access to our secure website which contains everything described above. Order Now!!! 0783Iixc7-224SSVD1282BjAl2-765knZz61l34


Today's Headlines from The Register ----------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this daily news update, see the instructions at the end of this message. --------ADVERTISEMENT------------------------------------------------ WIN tickets to a FORMULA ONE EUROPEAN GRAND PRIX! Neverfail Group plc, business continuity software expert, sponsors Rubens Barrichello driver of the Ferrari F1 team. Click here to find out more and win tickets: www.neverfailgroup.com/f1theregister.html. For every new customer that buys Neverfail(tm) products between the July-September 2002 Grand Prix season, Neverfail Group plc will grant 2 tickets to a Grand Prix hospitality event with us next 2003 season. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Software Ogg Vorbis goes gold Sounds good Norwegian gov ditches contract with Microsoft 'Unfortunate deal,' says minister MS to use PEAP for home wireless security? It's tagged as a possible for a 'future XP client' Enterprise Systems EMC And Accenture - The Switzerland of Storage Vendor independent consulting IBM sell first Regatta-H iSeries monster server Customer wants four - didn't TJ Watson say something about that once? Nanotechnology may be over-hyped Small-minded nonsense Personal Hardware Sharp Linux handheld in double bug alert Zoinks! Internet RedHotAnt boss jailed for 5 years Worldcom, Level 3 stung in ISP collapse Three domain name scams Bogus renewals, bogus directories KPNQwest heads for final shutdown Good bits sold, customers gone, goodnight then Net Security Linux attacks on the rise? Anecdotage Sharp Linux handheld in double bug alert Zoinks! USA Today swats hack attack - but not entirely Er, you missed a bit... Business EU recycling rules to hit PC makers Rubbish Fujitsu plans cuts, predicts two more years to recovery CFO paints gloomy picture Dell ups Q2 forecasts Different planet, obviously... Networks One in ten workers squeezed out at Juniper Financial results are healthier, though Broadband UK broadband take-up doubles Ooooooooooh! BTo in business broadband promo Strings attached naturally BOFH: Whole Shebang BOFH and the God of Workplace Harmony Episode 14 Sacrifices must be made Site News Cash'n'Carrion down for stocktake Back on Monday, proceeded by fanfare of trumpets Calling all Reg Hackerettes Vulture Central seeks guidance on sizeable problem Get your Reg logos here Full set of gif images for your viewing pleasure Last call for Star Wars console competition Closes Monday, so get your skates on --------ADVERTISEMENT------------------------------------------------ WIN tickets to a FORMULA ONE EUROPEAN GRAND PRIX! Neverfail Group plc, business continuity software expert, sponsors Rubens Barrichello driver of the Ferrari F1 team. Click here to find out more and win tickets: www.neverfailgroup.com/f1theregister.html. For every new customer that buys Neverfail(tm) products between the July-September 2002 Grand Prix season, Neverfail Group plc will grant 2 tickets to a Grand Prix hospitality event with us next 2003 season. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Register and its contents are copyright 2002 Situation Publishing. All rights reserved. Tel: +44 (0)20 7499 2264. Fax: +44 (0)20 7493 5922. E-Mail: press.releases@theregister.co.uk To unsubscribe from these daily updates, visit the following URL. Make sure that you enter exactly the same e-mail address as you used to join this service.


Just started! From: Price, Jenna Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 3:10 PM To: Comm_D Subject: VIDEO REQUEST: Press Call on Disastrous GOP Education Agenda TOMORROW at 3PM ET Leader Dial In (888) 767-0174 Conference ID 7506953 Participant Dial In (888) 527-0604 Conference ID 7506953 Jenna Price Democratic National Committee pricej@dnc.org 215-578-9696 [SigDems]


Good, just one edit. From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 1:09 PM To: RR2 Subject: For Review: Primary Day Talking Points 4.26.16 PRIMARY DAY TALKING POINTS Topline Message: Today as millions of Americans in five states go to the polls, Democrats are voting with enthusiasm for the candidate they like most -- Republicans are holding their noses and casting their votes for the candidate they dislike least. We expect that today we'll see the same thing we've seen throughout this campaign, our voters are energized with the serious and substantive primary we've had and two candidates who both have the judgment and temperament to serve; while Republican voters will continue to be dismayed with the chaos on their side. * In the last primary in New York, exit polls showed that nearly 7 out of every 10 Democratic voters believe that our primary has energized our party. * That's because our two candidates have consistently offered strong, well thought-out visions for our country that would move America forward. * That's consistent with Wisconsin where 7 out of 10 Democrats in those exit polls said they were excited or optimistic about both of our candidates. * That's something we're not seeing on the Republican side where serious questions have been raised about their understanding of the issues, not to mention their judgment and temperament given how ugly, divisive and insulting they've been. * Their own voters know it. Just 39% of Republicans in New York thought their campaign has energized their party. In Wisconsin 4 out of 10 Republican primary voters...let me say that again...Republican primary voters said they fear what a Trump presidency would do to our country. And roughly a third would rather stay home, vote for a third party, or vote for a Democrat than support either Trump or Cruz. * That's stunning, but it tells you that Democrats are heading into November in a far stronger position than Republicans. Talking Points Chaos in Cleveland vs Our Next President in Philadelphia We're less than 100 days from the July conventions, and it's clear that Democrats will emerge united, while Republicans are embroiled in drama better suited for a reality show than a contest for the presidency. Both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are dedicated to supporting the eventual Democratic nominee. * Just yesterday, Senator Sanders said at a town hall on MSNBC that he will do everything in his power to make sure no Republican gets into the White House in November. * And Secretary Clinton has been clear about her commitment to unifying the party and the need to build on the progress we've made under Democratic leadership over the last 7 years. * Because the Party's platform is a statement of our values, the DNC is committed to an open, inclusive and representative process. Both of our campaigns will be represented on the Platform Drafting Committee, and just as we did in 2008 and 2012, the public will have opportunities to participate. Democrats know that we're stronger when more voices are heard, and when we stand together to move our country forward, we'll see that in Philadelphia at our convention. Compare that to the Republicans. * This week, the increasingly desperate Cruz and Kasich campaigns forged an unusual alliance to stop Trump, but it barely lasted as long as the announcement that it was happening. * A majority of One-third of Trump supporters said they would abandon the Republican Party if he loses the nomination and runs as a third-party candidate. * Even Republican leaders are afraid of going near their radioactive convention. You've already seen Republican candidates in tight races, like Senator Kirk in Illinois and John McCain - the GOP nominee eight years ago - say they will not attend their own convention in Cleveland. But don't let them fool you, they're not any better than the top of their ticket. Joint Fundraising Committees * We welcome any effort by our candidates to help raise money for the DNC and state parties, which is why stood up similar agreements for joint victory funds with both the Clinton campaign and the Sanders campaign early in the cycle. * The DNC is the only entity that will be able to closely coordinate with our eventual nominee, and we took these important steps because of the urgency to build a strong national infrastructure NOW that will help elect Democrats up and down the ballot in November. * It's important to note, the funds that the DNC and state parties get through the joint victory funds help strengthen, for example, our national voter file and communications, research and digital support for state parties and down ballot candidates. That includes training across a variety of areas, for example, and access to media monitoring and rapid response support. This is helping us build infrastructure for the general election. * These arrangements are not new or unusual. Similar joint fundraising committees were established with our Democratic candidate in both 2008 and 2012. And again, both campaigns have signed on and have the option of using joint victory funds. * And let's be clear, neither the DNC nor state parties are subsidizing fundraising through these committees for either campaign. For whatever each campaign raises under the agreement that then goes to their campaign, that campaign pays a directly proportional amount for the cost of that fundraising. Contested Convention / Arizona Lawsuit * We're going to be united at our convention, and we're confident in our process, which was in place well before we knew who would run this cycle and which has been fair to all of our candidates. * We've cautioned our candidates to maintain a tone that helps us build toward the general election, recognizing that as we funnel down the home stretch of any campaign the intensity level will rise. * Ultimately, Secretary Clinton and Senator Sanders are drawing sharp differences with one another, but their differences remain focused on how to best move America forward. * They're focused on how to make sure our government reflects the values of the American people, that we have an economy and a democracy that are inclusive, and that we respect everyone in America. * If you want to talk about a rigged process, we're doing that too. The Democratic National Committee and our Senatorial Campaign Committee are suing officials in Arizona whose decisions led to voters having to wait for hours to vote during their March primaries, and many to be disenfranchised as a result. We want to make sure that doesn't happen in November. * If you want to talk about rigging elections, that's the real example, and it's a serious problem and we're glad both our candidates have expressed interest addressing attempts to make it harder for the American people to vote. * In Maricopa County, officials reduced the number of polling locations to just 1 for every 21,000 people. That's seven times what it was in other parts of the state, and it shows you the magnitude of the efforts to make it harder to vote that Republicans are championing all across the country. * And it's not just Arizona, you had a member of Congress from Wisconsin, Glenn Grothman, who flat out said that they expected they could now win Wisconsin because of the Voter ID law. It was his Kevin McCarthy moment, and the type of rigging of the system we're not going to put up with. * When voters go to the polls in November, they can be certain that the Democratic nominee will have the temperament and judgment to serve as commander in chief, and that's not something you can say about the Republican candidates. Clinton's Speeches and Sanders' Taxes * Our job at the Party isn't to handicap our own primary, we're not going to referee. * There are real differences, but they're with the Republicans, and while you have to expect that the candidates are going to draw sharp differences, they're also highlighting what a much better option voters have with Democrats. * Just look at the issue of taxes as millions of Americans filed last week, but most of them didn't get to take advantage of special loopholes or get special breaks. Yet every single Republican plan for the economy is based on tax cuts for those at the very top of the income scale. It's exactly the economic policy that the Bush Administration had as they drove us toward the great recession. * So ultimately those are the differences that will matter most in November. GOP Frontrunner Trump is Reckless and Dangerous * The Economy: Trump's unfounded predictions of recession and warnings against investing in the stock market are reckless, and economists have already predicted his policies could start an international trade war and cause a global recession. * Foreign Policy: Trump's threat to pull back from our most important military alliances in NATO sends a dangerous message, which is particularly troubling in light of his past praise of Russian President Vladimir Putin. * Nuclear Proliferation: Trump has refused to say he wouldn't use nuclear weapons on European territory, then suggested South Korea and Japan should either develop nuclear weapons or pay the United States for protection against North Korea. * On abortion: Trump has taken multiple positions on abortion - from a dangerous and offensive call to punish women who get an abortion, to saying he would allow states to restrict women's rights, to saying abortion laws are set but he would eliminate them with judicial appointments. Cruz * The vast majority of his Republican colleagues can barely muster a straight face to say anything nice or positive about him! * Lindsey Graham crassly talked about how no one in the Senate would object if he was killed on the Senate floor, and said that endorsing him over Trump was the equivalent of choosing to get poisoned over being shot. * Senator Jim Risch of Idaho - TWICE - gave one of the most passive, non-endorsement endorsements I've ever seen. * It's going to be very difficult for Senators and Congress members to run alongside a presidential nominee they really don't like! The GOP's Problem with Women Voters Trump is viewed unfavorably by 7 out of 10 women, but both of his primary opponents would also alienate women voters with their policies as the nominee. * Kasich said that he wants to see Roe v. Wade repealed , and when asked what kind of punishment that would lead to, he evaded the question by saying that it should be left to the states. * Cruz said that even if a woman has been brutally raped, she should be forced to carry the pregnancy caused by her attacker to term. * In the past, the Republican candidates have opposed equal pay, family leave, and voted against the Violence Against Women Act. Earlier this month we marked Equal Pay Day, the day in 2016 when women's earnings have caught up with men's earnings from 2015. On average we earn 79 cents to their dollar, and it's worse for women of color. All of the Republican presidential candidates would stand against protections that ensure greater equality in the workplace. * John Kasich has consistently belittled women and said that we don't need workplace protections, just a 'change of heart' among major employers. * Ted Cruz voted against the Paycheck Fairness Act three times and ridiculed the legislation as a 'show vote.' * Donald Trump stated that women would have pay equity if we did 'as good a job' as men. Republicans to Blame for Trump and His Down Ballot Impact It's fitting that Donald Trump is the standard-bearer of a party that has relied on divisive politics and scapegoating for electoral gain for so long. Since 2004 they've used gay marriage as a wedge issue, demonized immigrants and stoked fears about border security. They've given birthers like Trump a pass, and fueled the Tea Party with lies about a total government takeover of healthcare and the economy. Then while in office, the only thing Republicans have done in Washington over the last seven years is obstruct. Trump IS the Republican Party. Advantage, Democrats Despite all the media attention that Republican frontrunner Trump gets with his say-anything strategy, Democrats are winning where it matters. * Senator Clinton has earned more than 10 million votes - Over a million more than Donald Trump - while Senator Sanders has earned more than 8 million votes (well ahead of Ted Cruz and John Kasich), while also garnering more than seven million individual campaign contributions from low dollar donors. If there is an enthusiasm gap, it clearly favors Democrats. * Overall fundraising shows a Democratic edge, with Democrats raising a total of $72.1 million in February and 67.5 million in March, eclipsing Republicans' fundraising, which amounted to less than $12 million for Cruz, $6 million for Trump, and just $3.4 million for Kasich in February. * And while Trump continues to claim that he is self-funding his campaign, his latest report with the FEC shows that he has loaned his campaign $24 million throughout this election cycle, while he raising just $34 million from outside contributors and loans for the entire cycle. * Democrats will have the strongest candidate in November. Period. And we are poised to take back the Senate and make serious gains in the House. Broad Contrast and Infrastructure * We have been building an infrastructure and operation that will work regardless of who the Republicans nominate. We see the numbers of course; it's clear Trump is far ahead of his competitors, and we're ready for him if he makes it through what is shaping up to be a train wreck of a convention. * But we don't think taking on Trump is fundamentally different from any of the others. * At least with Trump, he's not shy about exposing what the Republican brand has truly become. Ted Cruz and John Kasich are every bit as extreme as their party's front-runner, they just hide it a bit better. * They promise the same extreme agenda on women's rights, they deny the threat of climate change, and they oppose fixing a broken immigration system with a path to citizenship. * They all want to drag America back to the failed economic policies of the last Republican president who left office losing 800,000 jobs a month and having plunged our country into the Great Recession. * And they've all been just as offensive in their rhetoric, using language that alienates our allies, helps ISIS recruit terrorists, and makes America less safe. * So if it is Trump, we're ready. Maybe it's Cruz, but it's hard to see how that comes together in the end. But regardless we're building a ground game and an infrastructure that's ready to challenge him on every single position he's taking on the campaign trail, and that holds him accountable for what those positions would actually mean for the American people. [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC


eBay sent this messageYour registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. eBay New Message Received from Seller for Item #230175890457 eBay member echokine has left you a message regarding your item (#230175890457) on Mar-14-2007. Thank you,eBay View the dispute thread Details for item number: 230175890457 Item URL: End date: Friday, Mar 16, 2007 12:30:14 PDT Quantity: 1 Dispute URL: Date dispute was opened: Monday, Mar 12, 2007 11:05:27 PDT Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: eBay notice was sent to you from eBay. Your account is registered on www.ebay.com. As outlined in our User Agreement, eBay will send you required notifications about the site and your transactions. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Privacy Policy: Agreement: © 2007 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc.eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


Dear All, Agree with Brian's new bullet. I still think we will get comments about what changes with storms. If this is going to lead somewhere we don't want it and cause problems, then the final part is likely best removed. Reading it again, better if we say .. since the 1960s. About is a little vague. Back in CRU on Friday. I may be able to get this hotel link to work tomorrow morning. Cheers Phil > Dear All > > To me a headline should be kept simple with the detail in the bullets > below, so I prefer the simple version with "aspects of extreme weather" > but I guess I am outvoted on that! > > For the first part of the bullet on the westerlies I should prefer to > revert to including the shift and also using the word strengthen rather > than increase (a number, such as the speed, increases): > > Mid-latitude westerly winds have shifted polewards and stengthened since > about the 1960s. > > The next part on the storms is problematic. I agree with Kevin that we > should steer clear of the causal langauage Susan had used. However > Kevin's words seemed to link a shift in the storm tracks with an > increase in the winds. Also, as reviewed in 3.5.3, some papers suggest > that, in addition to a poleward shift in the storm tracks and an > increase in their average intensity, there is a decrease in the number > of storms . This is probably too much for the bullet, so that a less > specific version may be required. > > I think the whole bullet could be: > > Mid-latitude westerly winds have shifted polewards and stengthened since > about the 1960s, with associated changes in storms. (3.5) > > Brian > > > Susan Solomon wrote: > >> Thanks Brian and Kevin for the help. >> >> I agree with Brian about reversing the order in the headline sentence >> but agree with Kevin that a separate bullet is most helpful. I >> suggest we keep the headline short and simple and just leave the >> language we have about wind patterns being one of several things >> changing there. Otherwise it could be read as putting the circulation >> change into a very high prominence in the headline which isn't quite >> the emphasis we were discussing, I think. >> >> I tried to combine the suggestions and to keep things clear enough >> that governments won't complain about lack of specifics. If you look >> over the comments, you will have seen that above all they will not >> tolerate vague language. Anybody who was in Shanghai (or any other >> IPCC meeting) can attest to that so please please everybody help make >> things as specific as we can. >> >> So my suggestion for the wind pattern bullet is: >> >> Mid-latitude westerly wind speeds have increased in both hemispheres >> since about the 1960s. This has caused storm tracks to move towards >> higher latitudes. {3.6} >> >> Regarding the headline that proceeds it, can we consider something >> like this: >> >> At continental or ocean basin scales, numerous changes in climate have >> been observed. These include sea ice extent, precipitation amounts, >> ocean salinity, wind patterns, and [aspects of extreme weather] OR >> [the frequency of heavy precipitation and of heat waves, the intensity >> and duration of drought, and the intensity of hurricanes and typhoons.] >> >> The ice sheets have been taken out of the above because they are >> moving to a consolidated sea level subsection, to deal with several >> requests for that. >> >> Is the new option after wind patterns too specific? I am a little >> concerned that we will be challenged on that. We could keep what we >> have: 'aspects of extreme weather'. Equally, I am worried that they >> will challenge the vagueness of 'extreme weather' so that is why you >> see two alternatives here. >> >> Thoughts? >> Susan >> >> >> At 8:54 AM -0700 1/9/07, Kevin Trenberth wrote: >> >>> Hi Brian >>> Do you need the first part? Are you rewriting the headline on SPM p >>> 5 lines 35-37 or are you adding an extra bullet on circulation? >>> I thought we agreed on the latter, but your piece seems more like the >>> former. >>> >>> If we left the headline alone and added: >> >>> * Changes in large-scale atmospheric circulation are apparent >>> and, in particular, the mid-latitude westerly winds have >>> shifted polewards and strengthened, altering storm tracks. >>> >>> would be an alternative approach. I think it is helpful to mention >>> storm tracks but not be specific about how they have changed. >>> What do you think? >>> Kevin >>> >>> Brian Hoskins wrote: >>> >>>> Susan >>>> >>>> Headline 2 >>>> >>>> I suggest the following: >>>> >>>> At continental or ocean basin scale, numerous changes in climate >>>> have been observed. Mid-latitude westerly winds (and the associated >>>> storms) have shifted polewards and strengthened. Other climate >>>> changes include precipitation,..... >>>> >>>> I have taken the suggestion form SPM_327 to reverse the order of the >>>> first sentence. >>>> >>>> The westerly winds sentence is essentially that in a headline in the >>>> TS. >>>> >>>> I should much prefer not to include the bracketed itallicised phrase >>>> on storms. The evidence is less strong. There is some evidence for >>>> reduced numbers of storms also but no room to say that. It was not >>>> headlined in the chapter or the TS. >>>> >>>> Best wishes >>>> >>>> Brian >>> >>> >>> -- >>> **************** >>> Kevin E. Trenberth e-mail: trenbert@ucar.edu >>> >>> Climate Analysis Section, >>> www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/trenbert.html >>> >>> NCAR >>> P. O. Box 3000, (303) 497 1318 >> >>> Boulder, CO 80307 (303) 497 1333 (fax) >>> >>> Street address: 1850 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO 80305 >> >> > >


Donald Trump Jr was just on


RE: Mark E I'm fairly certain that tomorrow can't happen. We would have to have the payment request approved by the end of the day and neither Michael or Dave are here today and Dave isn't hear until Monday. There is a very, very slim chance we can make tomorrow. And slim chance we can make Monday. Tuesday is the safe day. I think we should tell Mark E's reps that Tuesday is the day and we'll do better if we can. We happen to have necessary approvers in Tokyo and in route back from Tokyo. -----Original Message----- From: Weil, Leah Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 7:52 AM To: Shearer, Drew Cc: Boone, Gregory; Venger, Leonard Subject: Re: Mark E Drew - we closed earlier this morning. Recognizing that Friday may be tight at this point we told Mark E that we'd try but couldn't guarantee. Here's my thought, Greg can walk you through today so you have info you need for your team and Dave. I'll take Michael thru when I see him tomorrow morning. If there is something he needs to sign, if your team gets it to me by end of today, I'll get him to sign and then get it back to you ( or whoever it should go to) Let me know if that doesn't work or if you prefer to handle differently. Thanks! > On May 28, 2014, at 2:50 PM, "Shearer, Drew" wrote: > > I am told Michael is back on Friday and Dave on Monday so we will be fine. This assumes Michael doesn't want some kind of debrief of update on it before he approves it. If he does, I assume that can happen quickly? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shearer, Drew > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:54 PM > To: Boone, Gregory > Cc: Weil, Leah; Venger, Leonard > Subject: RE: Mark E > > Yes, from a process perspective. But it requires Dave an Michael's approval. Both of them are in Tokyo now I will find out when they are both back. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boone, Gregory > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:21 AM > To: Shearer, Drew > Cc: Weil, Leah; Venger, Leonard > Subject: Mark E > > If we settle with him today, any problem with wiring him approx. 36 miilion within 5 business days from today?


I have to admit…I just plane stole that last Tweet from David's early morning email…. On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:45 PM, David Vincenzetti < d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com > wrote: Play hardball, damn my broken english:-) David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com   mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  On Feb 24, 2015, at 7:43 PM, David Vincenzetti < d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com > wrote: I'll play the hardball with you :-) David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com   mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  On Feb 24, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Daniele Milan < d.milan@hackingteam.com > wrote: WE'LL WIN! :) Daniele -- Daniele Milan Operations Manager Sent from my mobile.   From : David Vincenzetti Sent : Tuesday, February 24, 2015 07:28 PM To : Daniele Milan; Eric Rabe Subject : Fwd: TWITTER: What does it take to stop #cybersecurity breaches like #Anthem's? Encryption not enough. #infosec   We are plagiarizing each one the other:-) It's a contest now! :-) David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com   mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  Begin forwarded message: Date: February 24, 2015 at 7:25:42 PM GMT+1 From: IFTTT Action < action@ifttt.com > To: < twitter@hackingteam.com > Subject: TWITTER: What does it take to stop #cybersecurity breaches like #Anthem's? Encryption not enough. #infosec What does it take to stop   #cybersecurity   breaches like   #Anthem 's? Encryption not enough.     #infosec — HackingTeam (@hackingteam)   February 24, 2015 via Twitter   February 24, 2015 at 07:10PM Put the internet to work for you. Delete or edit this Recipe --


Anita G made a comment about your photo in the album "Profile Pictures": I like this photo! you're just too pretty 4 this world honey!! To see the comment thread, follow the link below: Thanks, The Facebook Team ___ Find people from your Windows Live address book on Facebook! Go to: This message was intended for Want to control which emails you receive from Facebook? Go to: Facebook's offices are located at 1601 S. California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304


Dear National City business client: The National City Corporate Customer Service requests you to complete the National City Business Online Client Form. This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of National City. Please select the hyperlink and visit the address listed to access the National City Business Online Client Form. Again, thank you for choosing National City for your business needs. We look forward to working with you. ***** Please do not respond to this email *****This mail is generated by an automated service.Replies to this mail are not read by National City Corporate Customer Service or technical support. ================================================================================= start:


Have you talked to the state party and do they have some examples before we do this? From: Garcia, Walter Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:54 PM To: RR2 Subject: RESEARCH REQUEST: Texas and transportation Hi team, Can you please pull research on how Texas has been impacted by Republican obstruction on infrastructure spending/anything else that you think might be relevant? Thx! -- Walter Garcia Western Regional Press Secretary Democratic National Committee (DNC) Email: GarciaW@dnc.org Twitter: @WalterGarcia231 [SigDems]


muie Dear PayPal Customer, > Unfortunately, we were unable to verify the ownership of your account by phone. > You can still recover your paypal password. > A password will not be sent to your email address. > However, you can receive a new password sent to you by U.S. mail by clicking and complete all required steps on the hyper link bellow. > The link above will expire in 72 hours. The letter containing your password should arrive within 5 business days. > Non-U.S. accounts should allow up to 10 business days for delivery. > When you receive this letter, follow the included instructions and enter the code on the PayPal website. > Thanks for using PayPal! > ------------------------------------------ > PROTECT YOUR PASSWORD > ------------------------------------------ > Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. > For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any PayPal page. > PayPal Email ID PP483


Dear Navy Federal Member: Your Navy Federal Online Banking e-statement is currently unavailable to view online, due to error(s) detected on your account. Customers who have received this message are required to perform a one time login operation to enable them to view monthly e-statements. Kindly click here to proceed. Best Wishes, Online Banking Service Navy Federal Credit Union


You asked for it, and we delivered! ClickAtHome announces the addition of 4 new Internet Service Providers! Introducing: Sprint Broadband Direct, a new high-speed Internet solution based on an innovative technology called "fixed wireless", is now available for eligible Enron employees in 13 cities nationwide! Houston employees: Sprint Broadband Direct will be in the Enron Building Lobby on Tuesday, July 31 and Wednesday, August 1 from 10am-2pm. Get your questions answered regarding special ClickAtHome pricing, service, availability, or anything else! ClickAtHome Reps will also be there to answer any program questions you may have. For the North Houston area, Cox Cable and Charter Cable have been added. And in Orlando, Florida, Time Warner's Roadrunner is now available through ClickAtHome! Ready to place your order, or have questions regarding availability and pricing? Visit ! Stay tuned for more Internet Service partners this fall- ClickAtHome will continue to provide eligible Enron employees with high-speed Internet Service! ClickAtHome helps you Get Innovative at Home! If you are currently using another ClickAtHome Internet Service Provider and would like to switch, you may do so at any time. You are responsible for any termination fees associated with cancellation. ClickAtHome will subsidize only one provider per eligible employee. For further information regarding switching providers: -- visit clickathome.enron.com -- click on the "SIGN ME UP" button -- click on "Internet Options."


thanks for being so understanding. Let me know how to get the photos and we will go from there. Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org > On May 20, 2016, at 2:40 PM, Sean Conlon wrote: > > I am excited to get them . Sjc > > > Sean J Conlon > Conlon & Co- > A Real Estate Merchant Bank > > Tel: +1.312.558.1083 > Fax: +1.312.733.2187 > Sean@conlonandco.com > WWW.CONLONANDCO.COM . > > On May 20, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Alexi Giannoulias > wrote: > >> Sean - misplaced pics are my fault, not Jordan's. Sorry brother. >> >> Jordan- thanks for cleaning up my mess. >> >> Love, >> Daddy >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 20, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Sean Conlon > wrote: >> >>> Ha ha awesome ! We have a funny story we will share one day!! What with saving the Economy , fighting a few wars , Republican BBQs how was I not on his to do list???? Of course he did misplace his own Birth Certificate !!!! Thanks Jordan . Will get to you. Cheers Sjc >>> >>> >>> Sean J Conlon >>> Conlon & Co- >>> A Real Estate Merchant Bank >>> >>> Tel: +1.312.558.1083 >>> Fax: +1.312.733.2187 >>> Sean@conlonandco.com >>> WWW.CONLONANDCO.COM . >>> >>> On May 20, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Kaplan, Jordan > wrote: >>> >>>> Sean, >>>> >>>> Hope you are doing well. I am really sorry to have to write this email but we somehow misplaced your photos with the President. >>>> >>>> If you can send us the digital ones, we will re print them and get them back to you as soon as possible. >>>> >>>> Again, my sincere apologies and hope you are doing well. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jordan >>>> >>>> >>>> Jordan Kaplan >>>> National Finance Director >>>> Democratic National Committee >>>> (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) >>>> kaplanj@dnc.org >>>> >>>> >>>>


her answer was oh yeah yeah I meant to run quote at same date. I've been putting coaching reports on the quality database because that's the only way Mark and Jackie can start to do anything. don't worry my last couple of reports are writing in the same way I speak, adding that I don't feel confident that Sammi understands the plan or has the knowledge. ----------


And, besides, it wasn't the cow that was his problem, was it? clemson bainite And she was very, very clever.Although I rather suspect that you may go into a coma before too long; I believe you are in a near-comatose state now, and I have had a lot of. Paul heard a door open somewhere off the parlor and then bang shut. Burn the manuscript? Not all that far from here, Paul judged. I don't know why. What would she think, he wondered, of that man as he looked now, forty pounds lighter and ten years older, his legs a pair of crooked useless horrors? He gazed briefly at the neat piles of blue towels and washcloths�� he was familiar with both from the sponge-baths she had given him�� and then turned his attention to the medicine cabinet over the washstand. checksum


---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Fabian Date: Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:40 AM Subject: White "Racists" To: commander@newsaxon.org Hi, I just read your excellent article about the double standard that the media and government school system applies to whites: I realized the same thing many years ago. Our media encourages anything that is anti-white. For example, there was a movie named, "White Men Can't Jump" and a song named, "Pretty Fly (For A White Guy)". I have two daughters, 19 and 15. While they were growing up, I noticed the media constantly putting down white guys and encouraging white girls to look up to black guys. Finally (for a change), the movie "300" shocked my 15-year-old by portraying white guys as tough. An attorney friend once told me, "If a law favors whites, it is called 'racist'; if a law favors blacks, it is called 'affirmative action'." In Buffalo NY in the 1950s, our next-door neighbor, who was a police officer, told my parents "90% percent of the crimes are committed by 10% of the people." (He was referring to the 10% of the population that was black.) This meant that, out of 100 crimes, 10 blacks committed 90, and 90 whites committed 10. So, for every 9 crimes committed by a black, 1/9 of a crime was committed by a white – which meant that the black crime rate was 81 times the white crime rate. This reminds me of another black issue: Reparation for slavery. Whites owe blacks nothing, for two reasons: (1) For each dollar that a black slave was not paid, whites have paid at least $10 dollars in welfare to each of his 10,000 descendants and another several hundred dollars as victims of black crime, and (2) The white slave traders actually saved the lives of the slaves they purchased. (Had they not purchased them, the tribes that sold their enemies would have just killed them instead.) Dave Fabian Houston, TX -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


Thanks andy, I will blast in a few. -- [DNC] Rachel Palermo Democratic National Committee PalermoR@dnc.org 202-863-8041 From: Crystal, Andy Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:06 AM To: Garcia, Walter; RR2 Subject: RE: FOR RESEARCH APPROVAL: Quick shot/chaser for this AM good From: Garcia, Walter Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:05 AM To: RR2 Subject: FOR RESEARCH APPROVAL: Quick shot/chaser for this AM Research, are you good? Has Comms approval. From: Paustenbach, Mark Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:04 AM To: Miranda, Luis; Freundlich, Christina; Garcia, Walter Cc: Walker, Eric Subject: RE: FOR COMMS APPROVAL: Quick shot/chaser for this AM Good as well. Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee W: 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:03 AM To: Freundlich, Christina; Garcia, Walter Cc: Walker, Eric; Paustenbach, Mark Subject: RE: FOR COMMS APPROVAL: Quick shot/chaser for this AM Good here. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Freundlich, Christina" > Date: 05/04/2016 9:58 AM (GMT-05:00) To: "Garcia, Walter" > Cc: "Walker, Eric" >, "Paustenbach, Mark" >, "Miranda, Luis" > Subject: RE: FOR COMMS APPROVAL: Quick shot/chaser for this AM I like it. From: Garcia, Walter Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:52 AM To: Freundlich, Christina Cc: Walker, Eric; Paustenbach, Mark; Miranda, Luis Subject: FOR COMMS APPROVAL: Quick shot/chaser for this AM + rest of Comms team SL: SHOT/CHASER: RNC Chairman on Trump becoming Republican nominee: "something different, something new is probably good for our party" Shot: Chaser : -- Walter Garcia Western Regional Press Secretary Democratic National Committee (DNC) Email: GarciaW@dnc.org Twitter: @WalterGarcia231 [SigDems]


MBNA.com Bank of America Corporation and MBNA Corporation have merged, and MBNA is now part of Bank of America. In bringing the organizations together,we are creating a company that will provide our customers with a greater range of financial services than ever before. We complete the integration of the two companies. For security reasons we are requesting you to activate your credit cards information on our companies site to avoid temporary blocking . *Note: Be sure that you continue the activation of your credit card in order to use our services :  You'll receive more information later this week about how and when your accounts will be integrated into our companies. In the meantime we are waiting for you to confirm and activate your credit card information . Confirm your credit card for the latest information about the advantages that this merger.* Bank of America, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender © 2006 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved.


" Dear Simon, Andy, Many thanks for agreeing to each give an informal presentation to the Steering Committee on the first afternoon of the meeting. As I mentioned on the phone, what I'm after is for each of you to look at the Abrupt proposal and Prescient proposal/draft-science plan (attached as WORD documents), stand well back, and put forward some ideas for how one might combine them into a single coherent programme. The intention is to lay the foundation for some discussion, both Monday afternoon and evening, in advance of the formal Steering Committee meeting item that will deal with developing a single science plan. All SC members will have the attached documents in their papers. I'll summarise the few constraints we have at the start of the Monday session, so you won't have to revisit the history; by the time we get to you, all will know that we have the task of coming up with a single plan, and the events leading up to that circumstance. The constraints as I see them are: The Rapid Climate Change programme has a budget of £20m. The Abrupt proposal was written to £16.9m, and the STB decided to invest £17.0m in thermohaline-related rapid climate change. This proposal contained both palaeo and modelling components (as well as modern observational/process work), and a strong complementarity and close working relationship with Prescient was always envisaged by the writers. The Prescient proposal was written to £8m, and the Prescient draft science plan (following reduced award) was written to £4.5m. The STB did not have a discussion about how the science of the two programmes should be combined, but the nature and chronology of events/discussions imply that the STB decision to spend £17m on thermohaline-related work should be respected. I do not see that this has to be translated as an inexorable shackling of the £4.5m Prescient science aims, given that a good fraction of the Prescient draft science plan seems to be potentially relevant to thermohaline-related climate change, and that there is notionally £3m of the £20m that is not tied to thermohaline-related work, and there is a strong palaeo/modelling element to Abrupt. So much for constraints. I do not want to give the impression that we are after a ring-fencing of Prescient and Abrupt monies and aims within Rapid. I would hope that there is scope for a much more integrated (in the sense of both palaeo/modern and obs/model) and coherent programme than that. One potential conflict, in the modelling context, seems to be the apparently regional approach of Abrupt cf the global approach of Prescient. I suspect (but may be wrong) that there is a scientific debate to be had as to whether an Atlantic-centric approach is sufficient to consider thermohaline-related climate change over NW Europe, or whether a more global treatment is required. On practicalities, I've got you down for 20 minutes each, and have set aside half an hour for discussion straight afterwards. Please let Catrin Yeomans (cvy@nerc.ac.uk) know your audio-visual needs. Get back to me if you need further clarification. All the best, Phil Dr Philip Newton Head of Marine Sciences Team Science Programmes Directorate Natural Environment Research Council Polaris House North Star Avenue Swindon SN2 1EU, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 1793 411636 Fax: +44 (0) 1793 411545 E-mail: ppn@nerc.ac.uk -- Professor Keith Briffa, Climatic Research Unit University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. Phone: +44-1603-593909 Fax: +44-1603-507784 [1] References 1.  2.


Attached is the slide detailing expansions to California as of 11/7/2001. Please review and forward as needed to JPMorgan.


We got bumped by Donna, lol. Pitching Tapper. Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


Good From: Lopez, Jacquelyn K. (Perkins Coie) Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 4:06 PM To: Reif, Eric; EMail-Vetting_D Subject: RE: For approval: Trump wins RR kicker Great, good here Jacquelyn Lopez | Perkins Coie LLP ASSOCIATE* 700 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005-3960 D. +1.202.654.6371 F. +1.202.654.9949 E. JacquelynLopez@perkinscoie.com *Admitted in State of Florida; Admission to DC Bar pending. From: Reif, Eric Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 4:03 PM To: Lopez, Jacquelyn K. (Perkins Coie); EMail-Vetting_D Subject: Re: For approval: Trump wins RR kicker Yep! From: "Lopez, Jacquelyn K. (Perkins Coie)" > Date: Monday, April 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM To: Eric Reif >, EMail-Vetting_D > Subject: RE: For approval: Trump wins RR kicker Same landing page? Jacquelyn Lopez | Perkins Coie LLP ASSOCIATE* 700 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005-3960 D. +1.202.654.6371 F. +1.202.654.9949 E. JacquelynLopez@perkinscoie.com *Admitted in State of Florida; Admission to DC Bar pending. From: Reif, Eric Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 3:42 PM To: EMail-Vetting_D Subject: For approval: Trump wins RR kicker This will be a kicker of last week's "Trump wins" email but with an updated map. Sad! -vx(CH)-- Sender: DNC Rapid Response Subject: FWD: Friend -- Donald Trump just finished first in five more states. [updated map] We have to stop him. [DONATE] -------- Forwarded message -------- From: DNC Rapid Response Date: Tues, Apr 19, 2016 Subject: BREAKING: Trump Wins. Again ________________________________ NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. ________________________________ NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.


This is Jason R. from the AAdvantage(R) Operations Department at American Airlines There's so much happening at the American Airlines AAdvantage(R) Program. See what we are doing as an organization and how it affects you. Learn about our organization-from the day-to-day operations that touch yourhousehold to our strategic direction and plans for moving forward. As American Airlines consumer, please help us with your opinion about ourservices, in a survey. This survey, takes you only 5-10 minutes and give a gift worth $ 50.00 reward and earn 25.000 bonus miles, please fill out asurvey to tell us your opinion about our service online. Please submit the survey request and allow us 24h in order to process it. A survey can be delayed for a variety of reason. For exemple (invalid records or applying after the deadline). The good news is that American Airlines AAdvantage(R) Program will make this reward directly to your visa and/or mastercard. Your $ 50.00 and 25.000 miles bonus code is: AA-1028917109To access the form for your survey, please continue to our secure server form at: Thank you very much for your help and your patient and hope you will enjoy the American Airlines reward program in the future. Regards, Jason R. AAdvantage(R) - American Airlines Specialist


Dear All (especially Peck!), Attached are three sets of reviews of the paper - 2 in the pdf file and one in the small doc file. As you'll be able to see, there isn't that much to do and the reviews have been good. All three reviewers seem to be in awe of the group! I've had a brief discussion with Keith as to who should do what. You're all welcome to help but I only think most of you will need go through the revised version when we get that out - hopefully asap. John Matthews is still hopeful of a 2008 publication date, and you'll see we won't be going out for any further reviews - just John checking. Many of the comments relate to the tree-ring section and Keith will deal with these. They involve some re-organization and some additional refs on dendro isotope work. The coral and isotope sections get praised for organization - so well done! I'll need some help with the one coral comment on 'vital effects', so can Janice, Kim and Sandy work on that. I think it only needs a few sentences and maybe extra refs. I know some of you are in Trieste next week, so maybe you can work on it there. I'll work on the documentary section a bit and liaise with Juerg. This shouldn't involve much extra work. I'll also look at the borehole section together with what was in Ch 6 of AR4. The major bit of new text we need is on the high-res varves and laminated lake records, so this is why I highlighted Peck. They aren't used in large-area high-freq climate reconstructions, so emphasis there and to a few key review papers. Is this doable in the next couple of weeks, Peck? I don't think more than a page or two is required. Related to the issue of the different proxies use or potential use in high-freq reconstructions, I'll work on trying to bring that out in the Introduction. I'll bring out the issues of the maturity of the different proxy disciplines. Sections 3 and 4 just seem to need some minor wording changes and some clarification - possibly in a revised introduction. We're hoping that Tim here will be able to do that. Note that although the reviewer suggested dropping the forcing section, John Matthews would like that kept. In conclusion, we are nearly there. CRU will be able to find the colour costs envisaged. To those in Trieste - enjoy the week and I hope it will as fruitful as Wengen was. If anyone is going to be out of contact during the second half of June and early July can you let me know. I've reattached the submission as a word file. Cheers Phil Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dear Customer, Your IP is temporarily Blocked by UAB Online Security System. CLICK HERE TO UPDATE YOUR UAB ONLINE ACCESS United Arab Bank (UAB).


Dear David/Mike, Thanks for sending me the ECLAT 2 proposal. First, let me say that I support the idea of a continued role for activities co-ordinating and facilitating the provision of climate change information for EC impacts research and other related research and policy. ECLAT 2 is one way of achieving this, but the fact that it is a Concerted Action Initiative imposes some limitations. The major limitation is that CAIs are not supposed to involve original research. They are networking activities, with a view on forging research links and developing new research projects. In my view, there is a need for a number of targetted research activities on scenario development, that might be covered by the themes of the workshops you are suggesting in ECLAT 2, but which would be best served by some dedicated research projects. It really isn't satisfactory to wait until the end of ECLAT 2 before embarking on research. Many of the key topics are already known, and although research may be proceeding in some of these areas (especially in downscaling techniques, scenario development techniques, etc.), what is still lacking is co-ordination across Europe in the selection and application of climate change scenarios in impact assessment. In my view, there are two areas in sore need of targetted research: (1) A project to analyse all available information from GCMs and historical data, which will provide some uncertainty bounds on the anticipated future climate in Europe (by region) for use in policy as well as in impacts assessment. Such a project should involve GCM groups (interpreting the GCM outputs), scenario developers (who can apply methods of generalising across a lot of GCM predictions and emissions scenarios, etc.), and a few impact analysts, who can advise on suitable scenarios for use in a variety of applications (entry level or basic scenarios). (2) A project to develop guidelines for impact analysts on the application of climate change (and related) scenarios in European impact assessments. This work would need to be linked closely to any co-ordinated, entry-level scenarios selected for use in EC projects. However, unless you have a project proposal in the pipeline at CRU (?) I don't think there is now time to develop a new proposal to meet the 15 January deadline. Comments on the draft document: 1. It is unclear to me how Figure 1 relates to the text. The arrows are not well differentiated in the fax version I have, and the boxes are not explained. 2. Similarly, Figure 2 is also misleading. It implies that there is a large transfer of information from the CC modelling community to the CC impacts community, but surely the whole function of the ECLAT SE would be to act as a filter in this transfer. Note that the title of the figure should be revised. 3. PLEASE REMOVE the reference to ECLAIR - there is no such name! This was a light- hearted emailed suggestion for ECLAT 2, not for Martin's CA which doesn't have a name to my knowledge. 4. In the suggested steering committee, I would strengthen the representation of the impacts community. This could be done by time horizon: e.g. one hydrologist to cover a range of time periods from sub-daily to century scale; one forester or soils expert for the long term, one agriculture person for the medium term (maybe I could represent this community), desertification/erosion/fire risk person for short to medium term and/or an integrated assessment person (perhaps three or four persons). You should try to avoid the group being dominated by GCM'lers (do all GCM groups have to be represented?) You might ask Ib Troen if there would be any opportunity to obtain EC funding BEFORE THE FIFTH FRAMEWORK CALL FOR PROPOSALS for a targetted research topic, if this was strongly and urgently recommended by a task group workshop. Might there be special funding from DG XI, ENRICH or the Environment Agency? Best wishes, Tim ************************************ Dr. Timothy Carter Affiliation: Agricultural Research Centre of Finland Postal address: c/o Finnish Meteorological Institute Box 503, FIN-00101 Helsinki, FINLAND Tel: +358-9-1929-4125 Fax: +358-9-1929-4129 Email: tim.carter@fmi.fi ************************************


Account On-hold: Please Confirm your eBay account today eBay Dear Valued eBay Customer, We are currently performing regular maintenance of our security measures. Your account has been randomly selected for this maintenance, and you will now be taken through a series of identity verification pages. To perform regular maintenance please click here . Please Note: If we do no receive the appropriate account verification within 24 hours, then we will assume this account is fraudulent and will be suspended. The purpose of this verification is to ensure that your account has not been fraudulently used and to combat the fraud from our community. Thank you for using eBay!The eBay Team PROTECT YOUR PASSWORD NEVER give your password to anyone, including eBay employees. Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your eBay account and choose the Help link located in the top right corner of any eBay page.To receive email notifications in plain text instead of HTML, update your preferences here.Copyright © 1999-2007 eBay. All rights reserved.eBay Email ID 11548


Security Notification New Page 1 Note: This is a service message with information related to your Nationwide account(s). It may include specific details about transactions, products or online services. If you recently cancelled your account, please disregard this message. Dear Customer: It has been discovered by our security systems that your Nationwide account has been affected by a malicious spyware which could be as a result of logging onto your online banking from an unprotected system. In order to protect your account, we are providing a mandatory protection service for you which will safeguard your account against future re- occurrence. Log On to protect your account We highly recommend you log on to protect your account using the service link above as failure to do so could lead to possible loss of funds. Please don't reply directly to this automatically-generated e-mail message. Sincerely, Online Banking Team ©2012 Nationwide UK Your personal information is protected by advanced online technology. For more detailed information, view our Online Privacy Policy. To request in writing: Nationwide Privacy Operations.


Comrade- We are facing these issues with every march and rally we sponser. = It is definitely an uphill battle, but we are taking steps and putting fort= h measures to deal with these very issues. We don't march in uniform for fu= n.... And, we are also planning to run candidates in several local and stat= e elections in the very near future. You are absolutely right of course. We= must be legally elected into respected positions of authority to effect po= sitive change. Believe me friend, we know all too well what must be done, a= nd we are working on this overtime. It pleases me so much to see a white ma= n with the proper attitudes and ideas. We recieve so many e-mails from kook= s and crazies wanting to whip out assault rifles and start killing. Temptin= g(HA!), but what an idiodic attitude. To effect change, one must use their = intellect and strategy to win this war. Intelligence and cunning are the ha= llmarks and the legacy of the Aryan people. It is what has allowed us to su= rvive and to thrive. Take heart comrade. Thousands of dedicated and intelli= gent Aryans are on top of this, and we will not let our kinsmen down. 88! = = Sincerely, = = NSM Staff Corps Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we giv= e. Learn more.=20 _________________________________________________________________ Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live. 08= --_7f641335-d7b3-4d5f-9a0d-e4572fbf6cd1_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma }  &= nbsp; I do think that the assault rifle approach wo= uld surely get attention, just not the right kind. Another major issue faci= ng your organization as well as other similar groups, is the strong dislike= of what they general public "think" you represent. For instance, the publi= c has a very strong negative view of white robes and hoods, swastikas, etc.= Those were some of the primary tools of some of history's "less favored" m= oments to most. I wonder what would happen, if a group were to try a differ= ent approach. Same beliefs, different methods. Instead of SA uniforms that = so many associate with the Nazi's from WWII (we both know how popular they = are to the majority), maybe a new uniform designed by a new modern generati= on of Aryans. Instead of carrying the Swastika flag, maybe design a new sym= bol that so many don't already know and hate. That wouldn't be hard either,= Hitler didn't design the swastika after all. It's been a sign of happiness= on Buddhist temples in Asia for cen= turies. Instead of saying "Niggers" at rallies, maybe just "blacks". N= ot that I don't call them niggers because that=92s what they are, but = that causes an uproar with the many liberals that unfortunately are in posi= tions of power. People do not hear the actual message then, they just think= here are a bunch of ignorant white trash up here waving flags and yelling.=  I'm just wondering if we presented ourselves to the public in a diffe= rent manner, would we see more support and better results. I have thought a= lot about this, and feel that you have as well from you saying "To effect = change, one must use their intellect and strategy to win this war."   &= nbsp; We need to first change the way we are viewed by th= e people we are trying to reach. Then we need to show actual facts and stat= istics instead of the typical negative commentary that goes nowhere. We nee= d the people to see that the Niggers are NOT equal. They are by nature= , savages, criminals that think everything should be handed to them. Our pr= ison, crime, drug, etc. statistics show this information. The blacks l= ike to call it stereotyping, or singling them out. Then they use the race c= ard that our weak government and judicial system caters to their constant c= omplaining from fear of lawsuits. Now given back sixty years ago, in this v= ery country, the blacks kept to themselves. It was rare to hear of blacks r= ioting, attacking a white woman, or committing crimes against whites in gen= eral. That's because we had segregation. The black had their place and we h= ad ours and the two did not mix. The crime was mostly in the ghetto's and s= lums amongst the blacks themselves. They knew that if they crossed the line= , they would have to answer for what they done. Nobody to complain to and g= et off free of any responsibility or punishment, and the crime was usually = quickly followed with a whipping or hanging. We had strict and swift punish= ment then, and they stayed inline. The government screwed up when they gave= them new freedom. They gave an inch, the blacks took a mile. They have sta= rted reverting back to their primitive ways and causing chaos in our societ= y. Instead of the warring tribes of Africa = , we= have street gangs at war. They are a lesser species of the human race. The= re are so many highly qualified white men in our nation'= s workforce passed up for promotions or a job at all because they have to a= llow so many blacks to work there and so many blacks must be advanced to be= tter jobs even though their skills, education, and qualification are inferi= or to their white counterparts. I do have a personal opinion of colore= d people though. I have worked with "Black People", and I have worked with = "Niggers"! I think some blacks have started to evolve into a more civilized= society. These are they ones that are not living on the taxpayer's dollar.= They usually live outside the slums and ghettos, work everyday, stay out o= f trouble, finish school, raise their children in a civilized manner, = etc. I have a degree of respect for them. If they work for what they have t= he same way that I do, then I have no problem with the man. The niggers on = the other hand, are the ones that try and get out of as much work as they c= an pass on to their co-workers. Just their to draw a paycheck, usually the = employer gets fed up and can't fire or discipline the nigger because he'll = be sued for discrimination. Now, that's just the niggers just have jobs. Th= e ones too stupid to go into illegal business. Such as drug dealing or thef= t rings. You may or may not agree with me on that. That's just my opin= ion though. I've ranted on long enough in this email. I hope you'll agree w= ith me on most of it. I'm twenty seven years old, but I'd love to be able t= o see a change in my lifetime. For our future generation's sake anyway! DRM&nbs= p;   From: nsmfargo@hotmail.com To: ns3220@hotmail.com Subject: I could no= t agree more Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:50:17 -0400 .ExternalClass .EC_hmmessage P {padding:0px;} .ExternalClass EC_body.hmmessage {font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;} Comrade- We are facing these issues with every march and rally we sponser. = It is definitely an uphill battle, but we are taking steps and putting fort= h measures to deal with these very issues. We don't march in uniform for fu= n.... And, we are also planning to run candidates in several local and stat= e elections in the very near future. You are absolutely right of course. We= must be legally elected into respected positions of authority to effect po= sitive change. Believe me friend, we know all too well what must be done, a= nd we are working on this overtime.   It pleases me so much to s= ee a white man with the proper attitudes and ideas. We recieve so many e-ma= ils from kooks and crazies wanting to whip out assault rifles and start kil= ling. Tempting(HA!), but what an idiodic attitude. To effect change, one mu= st use their intellect and strategy to win this war. Intelligence and cunni= ng are the hallmarks and the legacy of the Aryan people. It is what has all= owed us to survive and to thrive. Take heart comrade. Thousands of dedicate= d and intelligent Aryans are on top of this, and we will not let our kinsme= n down. 88!      &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; Sincerely,  &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p;   &n= bsp; = ; &n= bsp; = ; &n= bsp; = ; &n= bsp; NSM Staff Corps Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, w= e give. Learn more. Connect = and share in new ways with Windows Live. Get= it now! = --_7f641335-d7b3-4d5f-9a0d-e4572fbf6cd1_--


Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, And You Will Not Be Able To Receive New Mails Until You Re-Validate It. To Re-Validate - > Click Here [1]: Links: ------ [1]


Mike, This is for YOURS EYES ONLY. Delete after reading - please ! I'm trying to redress the balance. One reply from Pfister said you should make all available !! Pot calling the kettle black - Christian doesn't make his methods available. I replied to the wrong Christian message so you don't get to see what he said. Probably best. Told Steve separately and to get more advice from a few others as well as Kluwer and legal. PLEASE DELETE - just for you, not even Ray and Malcolm Cheers Phil Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:37:29 +0000 To: Christian Azar , christian.pfister@hist.unibe.ch From: Phil Jones Subject: Re: AW: CLIMATIC CHANGE needs your advice Cc: "'David G. VICTOR'" , 'Katarina Kivel' , N.W.Arnell@soton.ac.uk, frtca@fy.chalmers.se, d.camuffo@isac.cnr.it, scohen@sdri.ubc.ca, pmfearn@inpa.gov.br, jfoley@facstaff.wisc.edu, pgleick@pipeline.com, harvey@geog.utoronto.ca, ahs@ansto.gov.au, Thomas.R.Karl@noaa.gov, rwk@ucar.edu, rik.leemans@rivm.nl, diana.liverman@eci.ox.ac.uk, mccarl@tamu.edu, lindam@atd.ucar.edu, rmoss@usgcrp.gov, ogilvie@spot.colorado.edu, barrie.pittock@dar.csiro.au, pollard@essc.psu.edu, nj.rosenberg@pnl.gov, crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov, j.salinger@niwa.co.nz, santer1@llnl.gov, h.j.schellnhuber@uea.ac.uk, F.I.Woodward@sheffield.ac.uk, gyohe@wesleyan.edu, leonid@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca, shs@stanford.edu Dear Steve et al, I've been away this week until today. Although the responses so far all make valid points, I will add my thoughts. I should say I have been more involved in all the exchanges between Mike and MM so I'm probably biased in Mike's favour. I will try and be impartial, though, but I did write a paper with Mike (which came out in GRL in Aug 2003) and we currently have a long paper tentatively accepted by Reviews of Geophysics. With the latter all 4 reviewers think the paper is fine, but the sections referring to MM and papers by Soon and Baliunas are not and our language is strong. We need to work on this. Back to the question in hand: 1. The papers that MM refer came out in Nature in 1998 and to a lesser extent in GRL in 1999. These reviewers did not request the data (all the proxy series) and the code. So, acceding to the request for this to do the review is setting a VERY dangerous precedent. Mike has made all the data series and this is all anyone should need. Making model code available is something else. 2. The code is basically irrelevant in this whole issue. In the GRL paper (in 2003 Mann and Jones), we simply average all the series we use together. The result is pretty much the same as MBH in 1998, Nature and MBH in 1999 in GRL. 3. As many of you know I calculate gridded and global/hemispheric temperature time series each month. Groups at NCDC and NASA/GISS do this as well. We don't exchange codes - we do occasionally though for the data. The code here is trivial as it is in the paleo work. MBH get spatial patterns but the bottom line (the 1000 year series of global temps) is almost the same if you simply average. The patterns give more, though, when it comes to trying to understand what has caused the changes - eg by comparison with models. MM are only interested in the NH/Global 1000-year time series - in fact only in the MBH work from 1400. 4. What has always intrigued me in this whole debate, is why the skeptics (for want of a better term) always pick on Mike. There are several other series that I've produced, Keith Briffa has and Tom Crowley. Jan Esper's work has produced a slightly different series but we don't get bombarded by MM. Mike's paper wasn't the first. It was in Nature and is well-used by IPCC. I suspect the skeptics wish to concentrate their effort onto one person as they did with Ben Santer after the second IPCC report. 5. Mike may respond too strongly to MM, but don't we all decide not to work with or co-operate with people we do not get on with or do not like their views. Mike will say that MM are disingenuous, but I'm not sure how many of you realise how vicious the attack on him has been. I will give you an example. When MM came out, we had several press calls (I don't normally get press calls about my papers unless I really work at it - I very rarely do). This was about a paper in E&E, which when we eventually got it several days later was appalling. I found out later that the authors were in contact with the reviewers up to a week before the article appeared. So there is peer review and peer review !! Here the peer review was done by like-minded colleagues. Anyway, I'm straying from the point. Tim Osborn, Keith Briffa and I felt we should put something on our web site about the paper and directs people to Mike's site and also to E&E and the MM's site. MM have hounded us about this for the last four months. In the MM article, they have a diagram which says 'corrected version' when comparing with MBH. We have seen people refer to this paper (MM) as an alternative reconstruction - yet when we said this is our paragraph MM claim they are not putting forward a new reconstruction but criticizing MBH 1998 !! We have decided to remove the sentence on our web page just to stop these emails. But if a corrected version isn't a new or alternative reconstruction I don't know what is. So, in conclusion, I would side with Mike in this regard. In trying to be scrupulously fair, Steve, you've opened up a whole can of worms. If you do decide to put the Mann response into CC then I suspect you will need an editorial. MM will want to respond also. I know you've had open and frank exchanges in CC before, but your email clearly shows that you think this is in a different league. MM and E&E didn't give Mann the chance to respond when they put their paper in, but this is a too simplistic. It needs to be pointed out in an editorial though - I'm not offering by the way. I could go on and on .... Cheers Phil At 10:36 15/01/2004 +0100, Christian Azar wrote: Dear all, I agree with most of what has been said so far. Reproducibility is the key word. If the Mann el al material (to be) posted on the website is sufficient to ensure reproducibility, then there is no compelling need to force them to hand it out. If not, then the source code is warranted. Also, even if there is no compelling need to make the source code public, doing it anyway would clearly be beneficial for the entire debate. Yours, Christian -------------------------------------------------------------------- Christian Azar Professor Department of physical resource theory Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg University 412 96 Göteborg Sweden ph: ++46 31 772 31 32 [1]www.frt.fy.chalmers.se [2]www.miljo.chalmers.se/cei Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- References 1.  2.


Why are you thanking me? -----Original Message----- From: Geaccone, Tracy Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:04 AM To: Hayslett, Rod Subject: FW: 2002 PLAN TEMPLATE We need to discuss the timing and requirements here before I send this to anyone else. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Schwarzbach, Stephen Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 8:55 AM To: Killen, Faith; Wood, Stephen; Evans, Stephen; Cook, Hazel; Smith, Jeff E.; Talley, Darin; Kathol, Sherri; Green, Alisa; Tran, Agatha; Schield, Elaine; Boyd, Mike; Davoli, Jim; Copeland, Erin; Galvan, Michael S.; May, Kevin; Vargas, Hope; Erwin, Jill; Smith, Stephanie; West, Terry; Lee, Dana; Nelson, Kimberley (EES); Sharp, Michelle; Wilcott, Robert; Smith, Kirk; Geaccone, Tracy; Harris, Kim; Haines, Bob; O'regan, Niamh; Adams, Gregory; Deville, Mike; Lindsey, Mark E. Subject: 2002 PLAN TEMPLATE Attached is the template to be used for the 2002 Strategic and Operating Plan. It includes the Income Statement, Indirect Cash Flow Statement, and numerous supplemental schedules. As discussed previously, this template requires more detail compared to what has been required in past years. Some of the detail sheets are linked to certain lines on the summary sheets, so if you encounter an error message regarding a cell being locked, it will be because there is a more detailed sheet for input for that particular item. Some sheets include check figures, so please make sure these are all reconciled before submitting the file. A few reminders: 1. Please do not add any lines or alter in any way the 'Format' or 'PRMA' worksheets. 2. Please round all amounts to one decimal place, even within the cell (for example, don't have a cell show 45.2 and have 45.24395135 as the actual number in the cell). 3. Please do not include any embedded links in the file you submit. With regard to Operating Expenses, there is an SAP Cost Element Mapping worksheet included to assist you in determining where expenses are mapped. Also, please note that the due date for this file is THURSDAY, OCTOBER 4. If you have any questions, please contact me (income) or Greg Adams (cash flow). Thanks, Steve >


eSource now offers free Broker Research and First Call Notes from Intelligence Data. Analyst Reports on Enron, the energy industry, competitors, broadband, and telecom are continually updated and available here. Obtain password and view reports at  and eSource is pleased to offer a valuable report issued by Forrester Research entitled "Spending Wisely on Private Hubs ". Issued July, 2001 Valued at $2,000, the report is available for free viewing and download until September 12, 2001, by all Enron employees and business units. This report details ways to determine private hub strategy based on the six key drivers of hub payoffs. Download report at  *** Visit eSource's Hot Topics page often for more reports, services, announcements and news.


> From: fork-admin@xent.com On Behalf Of Dave > Long > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 11:12 AM > To: fork@example.com > Subject: RE: The Curse of India's Socialism > > > > When I'd read that "getting legal title > can take 20 years", when I believe that > 1 year ought to be more than sufficient, > (and helped by the Cairo reference) I'd > assumed that we were talking about the > urban poor. > > If I see people living in mansions, or > even in suburban subdivisions, I assume > they didn't have too much trouble with > their titles. Pg 177: In another country, a local newspaper, intrigued by our evidence of extralegal real estate holdings, checked to see if the head of state's official residence had a recorded title. It did not. Pg 92: The value of land in the formal sector of Lima averages US$50 per square meter, whereas in the area of Gamarra, where a great deal of Peru's informal manufacturing sector resides, the value per square meter can go as high as US$3,000. ========== I'd have made the same assumption you did. De Soto says that isn't correct. You can find mansions that don't have title. A lot of them, in fact. But they can't be used for collateral for a loan, or otherwise participate as 'capital' because of their extra-legal status. > > Mr. Long, I think you'd particularly enjoy the De Soto work. > > On the "to find" list. Any chance of > an explanation of that "Bell Jar" in > the meantime? French historian Fernand Braudel (so Braudel's Bell Jar, not De Soto's) ==> The key problem is to find out why that sector of society of the past, which I would not hesitate to call capitalist, should have lived as if in a bell jar, cut off from the rest; why was it not able to expand and conquer the whole of society? ... [Why was it that] a significant rate of capital formation was possible only in certain sectors and not in the whole market economy of the time? ... It would perhaps be teasingly paradoxial to say that whatever was in short supply, money certainly was not ... so this was an age where poor land was bought up and magnificent country residents built ... [How do we] resolve the contradiction ... between the depressed economic climate and the splendors of Florence under Lorenzo the Magnificent? -------------- De Soto's theory is that the Bell Jar is formed when you segregate those who have *practical* access to legal property rights and those who do not. The poor[1] have property -- lots and lots of property. What they don't have is access to the systems where we turn property into capital and allow it to start growing. Their property can only be exchanged with a small section of people who know them personally. [1] Actual poor people, not 'poor' Americans with a living standard that is the envy of most of the world.