Dear Eleven, I was very disturbed by your recent letter, and your attempt to get others to endorse it. Not only do I disagree with the content of this letter, but I also believe that you have severely distorted the IPCC "view" when you say that "the latest IPCC assessment makes a convincing economic case for immediate control of emissions." In contrast to the one-sided opinion expressed in your letter, IPCC WGIII SAR and TP3 review the literature and the issues in a balanced way presenting arguments in support of both "immediate control" and the spectrum of more cost-effective options. It is not IPCC's role to make "convincing cases" for any particular policy option; nor does it. However, most IPCC readers would draw the conclusion that the balance of economic evidence favors the emissions trajectories given in the WRE paper. This is contrary to your statement. This is a complex issue, and your misrepresentation of it does you a dis-service. To someone like me, who knows the science, it is apparent that you are presenting a personal view, not an informed, balanced scientific assessment. What is unfortunate is that this will not be apparent to the vast majority of scientists you have contacted. In issues like this, scientists have an added responsibility to keep their personal views separate from the science, and to make it clear to others when they diverge from the objectivity they (hopefully) adhere to in their scientific research. I think you have failed to do this. Your approach of trying to gain scientific credibility for your personal views by asking people to endorse your letter is reprehensible. No scientist who wishes to maintain respect in the community should ever endorse any statement unless they have examined the issue fully themselves. You are asking people to prostitute themselves by doing just this! I fear that some will endorse your letter, in the mistaken belief that you are making a balanced and knowledgeable assessment of the science -- when, in fact, you are presenting a flawed view that neither accords with IPCC nor with the bulk of the scientific and economic literature on the subject. Let me remind you of the science. The issue you address is one of the timing of emissions reductions below BAU. Note that this is not the same as the timing of action -- and note that your letter categorically addresses the former rather than the latter issue. Emissions reduction timing is epitomized by the differences between the Sxxx and WRExxx pathways towards CO2 concentration stabilization. It has been clearly demonstrated in the literature that the mitigation costs of following an Sxxx pathway are up to five times the cost of following an equivalent WRExxx pathway. It has also been shown that there is likely to be an equal or greater cost differential for non-Annex I countries, and that the economic burden in Annex I countries would fall disproportionately on poorer people. Furthermore, since there has been no credible analysis of the benefits (averted impacts) side of the equation, it is impossible to assess fully the benefits differential between the Sxxx and WRExxx stabilization profiles. Indeed, uncertainties in predicting the regional details of future climate change that would arise from following these pathways, and the even greater uncertainties that attend any assessment of the impacts of such climate changes, preclude any credible assessment of the relative benefits. As shown in the WRE paper (Nature v. 379, pp. 240-243), the differentials at the global-mean level are so small, at most a few tenths of a degree Celsius and a few cm in sea level rise and declining to minuscule amounts as the pathways approach the SAME target, that it is unlikely that an analysis of future climate data could even distinguish between the pathways. Certainly, given the much larger noise at the regional level, and noting that even the absolute changes in many variables at the regional level remain within the noise out to 2030 or later, the two pathways would certainly be indistinguishable at the regional level until well into the 21st century. The crux of this issue is developing policies for controlling greenhouse gas emissions where the reductions relative to BAU are neither too much, too soon (which could cause serious economic hardship to those who are most vulnerable, poor people and poor countries) nor too little, too late (which could lead to future impacts that would be bad for future generations of the same groups). Our ability to quantify the economic consequences of "too much, too soon" is far better than our ability to quantify the impacts that might arise from "too little, too late" -- to the extent that we cannot even define what this means! You appear to be putting too much weight on the highly uncertain impacts side of the equation. Worse than this, you have not even explained what the issues are. In my judgment, you are behaving in an irresponsible way that does you little credit. Furthermore, you have compounded your sin by actually putting a lie into the mouths of innocents ("after carefully examining the question of timing of emissions reductions, we find the arguments against postponement to be more compelling"). People who endorse your letter will NOT have "carefully examined" the issue. When scientists color the science with their own PERSONAL views or make categorical statements without presenting the evidence for such statements, they have a clear responsibility to state that that is what they are doing. You have failed to do so. Indeed, what you are doing is, in my view, a form of dishonesty more subtle but no less egregious than the statements made by the greenhouse skeptics, Michaels, Singer et al. I find this extremely disturbing. Tom Wigley On Tue, 11 Nov 1997, Tim Mitchell wrote: > Reference: Statement of European Climate Scientists on Actions to Protect > Global Climate > > Dear Colleague, > > Attached at the end of this email is a Statement, the purpose of which is > to bolster or increase governmental and public support for controls of > emissions of greenhouse gases in European and other industrialised > countries in the negotiations during the Kyoto Climate Conference in > December 1997. The Statement was drafted by a number of prominent European > scientists concerned with the climate issue, 11 of whom are listed after > the Statement and who are acting as formal sponsors of the Statement. > > ***** The 11 formal sponsors are: ***** > > Jan Goudriaan Hartmut Grassl Klaus Hasselmann Jill Jäger > Hans Opschoor Tim O'Riordan Martin Parry David Pearce > Hans-Joachim Schellnhuber Wolfgang Seiler Pier Vellinga > > After endorsements from many hundreds of other European climate-related > scientists are collected (and we hope that you agree to be one of these), the > Statement will be brought to the attention of key decision-makers (e.g. EU > Kyoto negotiaters and Environment Ministers) and other opinion-makers in > Europe (e.g. editorial boards of newspapers) during the week beginning 24th > November. The UK and other European WWF offices have agreed to assist in > this activity, although the preparation of the Statement itself has in no > way been initiated or influenced by WWF or any other body. This is an > initiative taken by us alone and supported by our 11 Statement sponsors. > > WHAT WE ASK FROM YOU > > We would very much like you to endorse this Statement. Unfortunately, at > this time we can no longer take into account any suggested modifications. > Nevertheless, we hope that it reflects your views closely enough so that > you can support it. If you agree with the Statement, then: > > 1. PLEASE IMMEDIATELY FILL OUT the form below and either reply via email > (preferably) or telefax (only if necessary) to the indicated fax number. > Replies received after Wednesday 19th November will not be included. If > replying by email please do not use the 'reply all' option. If this > invitation has been forwarded from a colleague, please make sure your reply > is directed to the originators of this invitation, namely: > t.mitchell@uea.ac.uk (on behalf of Mike Hulme and Joe Alcamo). > > 2. We have identified about 700 climate-related scientists in Europe who > are receiving this email directly from us. If you feel it is appropriate, > PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE to up to three colleagues in your country who > are working in climate-related fields, who you think may support the > Statement and whom we have not targeted. To identify colleagues whom we > have already invited you can examine the email address list we have used > for your country in the email header (or else appended to the end of this > email). > > We realize that you are very busy, but this action may have a very positive > influence on public discussions during the critical period leading up to > Kyoto and during the Conference itself. > > With best wishes, > > Michael Hulme, Climatic Research Unit, UEA, Norwich > Joseph Alcamo, University of Kassel, Germany > > (On behalf of the other signatories of the Statement) > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > I agree to have my name placed on the list of scientists that endorse the > Statement of European Climate Scientists on Actions to Protect Global > Climate. > > Full Title and Name > > Affiliation Country > > Signature (for fax replies only) > > Date > > Other comments: > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > We would prefer you to return this email message to us by email, having > duly completed the form above. You should be sending the form to: > > **************************** > ** ** > ** t.mitchell@uea.ac.uk ** > ** ** > **************************** > > If you would rather not use the email reply function, then please print out > the form above and fax it (filled in) to: > > "Attention: European Climate Statement" > Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia > Telefax: +44 1603 507784 > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > > Statement of European Climate Scientists on Actions to Protect Global Climate > ============================================================================= > > In 1992, the nations of the world took a significant step to protect global > climate by signing the Framework Convention on Climate Change. This year, > at the coming Climate Summit in Kyoto*, they have the chance to take > another important step. It is our belief that the nations of the world > should agree to substantive action for controlling the growth of greenhouse > gas emissions. > > Our opinion is bolstered by the latest assessment of scientific knowledge > carried out by the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The > IPCC reported that "the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human > influence on global climate". They also gave examples of observed climate > change up to now, including: > > · Global mean surface air temperature has increased by between 0.3 to 0.6 > degrees Celsius since the late 19th century, and recent years have been the > warmest since 1860. > · Global sea level has risen between 10 and 25 centimeters over the past > 100 years. > > Based on estimates from computer models, the IPCC also maintained that > humanity will have a continuing and cumulative effect on climate in the > future. Future society may find that some climate impacts are positive, as > in the possible increase in rainfall and crop yield in some dry regions; > and society may be able to adapt to some impacts, such as by building dikes > against rising sea level. But many, if not most, climate impacts will > increase risks to society and nature, and will be irreversible on the human > time scale. Among the possible changes are further increases in sea level, > the transformation of forest and other ecosystems, modifications of crop > yield, and shifts in the geographic range of pests and pathogens. It is > also possible that infrequent but disastrous events, such as droughts and > floods, could occur more often in some regions. At particular risk are > people living on arid or semi-arid land, in low-lying coastal areas and > islands, in water-limited or flood-prone regions, or in mountainous > regions. The risk to nature will be significant in the many areas where > ecosystems cannot quickly adapt to changing climate, or where they are > already under stress from environmental pollution or other factors. > > Because of these risks, we consider it important for nations to set limits > on the increase of global temperature due to human interference with the > climate system. We recommend that European and other industrialized nations > use such long-term climate protection goals as a guide to determining > short-term emission targets. This approach has been adopted, for example, > by the European Union and the Alliance of Small Island States. > > Some may say that action to control emissions should be postponed because > of the scientific uncertainties of climate change and its impact. Our view > is that the risks and irreversibility of many climate impacts require > "precautionary measures to anticipate, prevent, or minimize the causes of > climate change", as stated in the Framework Convention on Climate Change. > > We also acknowledge that economic arguments have been put forward for > postponing the control of emissions in Europe and elsewhere. However, after > carefully examining the question of timing of emission reductions, we find > the arguments against postponement to be more compelling. First, postponing > action could shift an unfair burden for more severe reductions of emissions > onto future generations. Second, it will lead to a greater accumulation of > greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and hence make it more difficult to > prevent future climate change when action is finally taken. Third, the > latest IPCC assessment makes a convincing economic case for immediate > control of emissions. > > Rather than delay, we strongly urge governments in Europe and other > industrialized countries to agree to control greenhouse emissions as part > of a Kyoto agreement. Some controls can be achieved by reducing fossil fuel > use at little or no net cost through accelerated improvements in the > efficiency of energy systems, the faster introduction of renewable energy > sources, and the reduction of subsidies for fossil fuel use. Moreover, > reducing the use of fossil fuels will also reduce local and regional air > pollution, and their related impacts on human health and ecosystems. > > We believe that the European Union (EU) proposal is consistent with long > term climate protection. This proposal would reduce key greenhouse gas > emissions by 15% from industrialized countries (so-called Annex I > countries) by the year 2010 (relative to year 1990). Although stronger > emission reductions will be needed in the future, we see the EU, or > similar, goal as a positive first step "to prevent dangerous anthropogenic > interference with the climate system" and to lessen risks to society and > nature. Such substantive action is needed now. > > *Third Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate > Change, Kyoto, Japan, December, 1997. > > Signed: > > Jan Goudriaan Hartmut Grassl Klaus Hasselmann > Jill Jäger Hans Opschoor Tim O'Riordan > Martin Parry David Pearce Hans-Joachim Schellnhuber > Wolfgang Seiler Pier Vellinga > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > > ************************************************************************ > ** This message originated from the > ** Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. > ** It was sent out by > ** Mike Hulme and Tim Mitchell on behalf of the 11 key signatories. > ** If you object to being on this email address list, > ** please accept our apologies and inform us; > ** we will then remove your address from the list. > ** Please direct any comments to: > ** t.mitchell@uea.ac.uk > ************************************************************************ > > The list below consists of the people with UK email addresses to whom this > message has been sent: > > all CRU staff > Adger, N > Alcock, Graeme > Allan, P > Allan, Richard P > Anderson, Dennis > Armstrong, Adrian > Arnell, N W > Audsley, Eric > Baker, Richard > Baran, A J > Barker, Terry > Benestad, R E > Bentham, G > Bigg, G > Boucher, Keith R > Bouma, D > Bramwell, Penny > Brooks, Roger > Brown, Philip RA > Brugge, Roger > Bullock, P > Burkhardt, Ulrike > Butterfield, Ruth > Cai, Xiaoming > Cannell, Melvyn > Carling, Bob > Castleford, John > Chan, Angela H Y > Clark, Douglas B > Cluckie, I D > Collins, Matthew > Colman, Andrew > Connolley, William M > Cornford, Dan > Costigan, Peter > Cox, Peter > Cox, Peter M > Cui, Zhiqiang > Culf, Alastair > Cullum, Dave > Dale, Ian > Davis, Gerald R > Dewhurst, Nicola > Doherty, Ruth > Dokerty, T > Dorling, S > Downey, Ian > Downing, Tom > East, M. > Easthope, Mark > Evans, Sam > Favis-Mortlock, David > Ferris, Rachel > Fisher, Helen > Folland, Chris > Foot, John S > Ford, I J > Fowler, David > Friend, Andrew > Fruh, Wolf-Gerrit > Gallop, Rowland > Gawith, Megan > Geer, Alan > George, Glen > Gibson, J K > Giles, Brian > Goode, Helen Rachel > Gregory, David > Gregory, Jonathan > Gregory, Ken > Griggs, D > Grubb, Michael > Hannah, David M > Hansen, Jim > Harrison, Paula > Hawksworth, Kevin Stuart > Hedger, Merylyn > Hewitt, Chris > Highwood, Eleanor > Holt, Chris > Horton, Briony > Houghton, J > Houseago, Richenda > Huntingford, Chris > Hutchings, Jenny > Ingram, John > Ingram, W J > Jackson, Tim > Jakob, Christian > Jeffree, Christopher E > Jenkins, Geoff > Johns, Tim > Johnston, Peter > Jolliffe, Ian > Jones, Clive > Jones, Colin > Jordan, A > Joyce, Andrew N > Keen, Ann > Kennedy, Hamid > Kenworthy, Joan M > Keramitsoglou, Iphigenia > Kilsby, Chris > King, Ben P > King, John > Kings, John > Kniveton, Dom > Lamptey, Benjamin Lantei > Lary, David J > Liss, P > Livermore, Matt > Lloyd, Colin > Lynagh, Norman > Marshall, David > Marshall, Stewart > Maskell, Kathy > Matthews, B > Mavromatis, Theodoros > Mayes, Julian > Mayr, Thomas > McClatchey, John > McGregor, Glenn Russell > McKay, Douglas > McLaren, Alison > McMichael, Tony > Medlyn, Belinda > Merchant, Chris > Mitchell, John > Morison, James > Morse, Andy > Mulligan, Mark > Murphy, James > Murrill, A > Nicholls, Robert > Noguer, Maria > Orr, John > Palmer, Tim > Palutikof, Jean > Parker, David > Parkinson, Stuart > Parry, M > Pedder, Mike > Perry, Allen > Pierce, Clive > Pilling, C > Pope, V D > Pugh, D > Ravetz, Jerome R > Read, P L > Rey, N > Reynard, Nick > Reynolds, David > Roberts, D L > Rosier, Suzanne > Rounsevell, Mark > Rowell, Dave > Ryan, Sonja > Sanderson, Michael G > Scaife, Adam > Sear, Chris > Semenov, Mikhail > Shackley, Simon > Shao, Jianmin > Shine, Keith P > Simpson, I > Simpson, V > Sims, Graham > Skea, Jim > Slingo, Julia > Smithson, Peter > Snow, Keith > Spellman, Greg > Standley, Andy > Stott, Peter > Subak, S > Sumner, Graham > Sutton, R T > Tait, Andrew > Taylor, C M > Tett, Simon > Thorncroft, Chris > Thornes, John E > Thornton, Tim > Thorpe, Robert > Thuburn, John > Todd, Martin > Tullett, Michael > Turner, R K > Unwin, David > Veal, Anthony > Viterbo, Pedro > Walker, Malcolm > Wang, Kuoying > Warrilow, David > Washington, Richard > Webb, Mark > Wheeler, Tim > Wigley, Tom > Wilby, Rob > Wild, Richard > Williamson, P > Woodward, Stephanie > Wright, Peter > Wynne, Brian > Yamin, Farhana > > ********************************************************** *Tom M.L. Wigley * *Senior Scientist * *National Center for Atmospheric Research * *P.O. Box 3000 * *Boulder, CO 80307-3000 * *USA * *Phone: 303-497-2690 * *Fax: 303-497-2699 * *E-mail: wigley@ucar.edu * **********************************************************


-----Original Message----- From: J. Bennett Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:56 AM To: Lenart, Kirk Subject: [Fwd: FSBO Home] --------- Inline attachment follows --------- From: To: edge@buyers-edge.com Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2001 8:42:46 GMT Subject: Since you are a buyer's agent, we thought you might have a buyer for our property. Please see attached flyer if you are interested. Thank you, Sheila Ullrich >


Kathy Campos ETS Finance EB4055 713-853-6833


Hi Keith and Eystein - thanks for the timely and helpful (very) feedback, Keith. Your suggestions for 4 and 5 seem fine, and I wonder only about 6. I too am not sure where the final clause came from, but I'll guess it was a suggestion of Stefan's that then stood the text of time. In the spirit of trying hard not to change the meaning of bullets in the ES from what the LA team agreed to in Bergen, what about changing this clause in the ES to read "natural recovery", i.e.: and it is very unlikely that this warming was merely a natural recovery from the pre-20th century cold period." This takes away the ambiguity, and does serve to address a widely held misconception outside of our community - or at least to phrase the issue in terms that some might find more useful. If we keep this phrase, then I would suggest restating the entire ES sentence at the end of 6.6.3. Is this ok? Again, I'm motivated by our team agreement - I do think we could delete this phrase since it's more repetitive than new meaning, but would rather not unless it really does not work. Personally, I like it as modified above, because it hammers the important point from a slightly different perspective - one that seems to be on the minds of the public still. Thanks, both, for letting me know what you think fast. best, peck Hi Peck and Eystein In response to Points 4-6 4. Add the following after past 1300 years. on line 13 page Y-33 "Considering the recent instrumental and longer proxy evidence together, it is very likely that average Northern Hemisphere temperatures during the second half of the 20th century were warmer than any other 50-year period in the last 500 years. " Do not put anything in Box 6.4 which is written frolm the reverse perspective - evidence of medieval period not good enough to say warmer than now. Also confuses statements about 500 years and longer (1000 year ) Medieval ,time. 5. The person who says this has not read the text - see lines 28-33 on Y-32 where I think this is well covered. 6. If you read the text on lines 1-10 of PAGE Y-38 I think this meaning is clearly conveyed. It is not in the same words -but easily supports the ES statement. HOWEVER, I do not like the last part of the statement (and not sure where this came from) because it is ambiguous and anyway implied by prior statement. I strongly urge you to remove the section "and it is very unlikely that this warming was merely a recovery from the pre-20th century cold period." These would sort things out I believe cheers Keith At 19:26 05/10/2006, you wrote: Hi Keith and Tim - we just got the attached consistency feedback doc from the TSU, and I've added my thoughts in red. We need your feedback on items 4-6 REALLY FAST. Tim, if Keith's not around to help, please do the job - the TSU has zero time to give us. I think the solutions to #5 and 6 are easy as I suggested (although I don't have confirmation from Susan or Martin that we can just do as I suggest, but it seems logical to me - if you can suggest an even better solution, pls do. I'll send the official chap 6 final draft text next - at least as it stands today. thanks for dealing with this, perhaps before you go to sleep this evening. Best, Peck -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795 -- Professor Keith Briffa, Climatic Research Unit University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. Phone: +44-1603-593909 Fax: +44-1603-507784 -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795


$7.95 Power Hosting Limited Time Offer: Sign up and getFREE DOMAINand Free setup 150 MB Hosting25 Pop E-MailsSecure ServerUnlimited TransferContent PromoYour-Name.comYour own cgi-bin 24/7 FTP AccessDetailed Statistics Plus much more! Our Equipment:


Book & pay for your vacation rental on TripAdvisor Book & pay for your vacation rental on TripAdvisor Trouble viewing this e-mail? Vacation Rentals September 2014 Find your happy place Explore > Trending with Los Angeles travelers Palm Springs, California From $89/nt* See all rentals > Santa Barbara, California From $127/nt* See all rentals > San Francisco, California From $128/nt* See all rentals > The easy way to book.Did you know? You can book your vacation rental online! Gatlinburg, Tennessee Panama City Beach, Florida London, England Big Bear Region, California With millions of traveler reviews,TripAdvisor makes any destination better Search all rentals > Help other travelers choose the perfect rental Leave a review > *Rates are subject to change and may vary by date and availability. Minimum stay may be required. Go to TripAdvisor | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. If you have questions or need assistance, please ask us here . TripAdvisor LLC, 141 Needham Street, Newton, MA 02464, USA © 2014 TripAdvisor LLC. All rights reserved. TripAdvisor, the TripAdvisor logo, the Owl logo and Get The Truth. Then Go. are either registered trademarks or trademarks of TripAdvisor LLC in the U.S. and/or other countries. Trouble viewing this e-mail? Vacation Rentals Find your happy place Explore > Trending with Los Angeles travelers Palm Springs, California — From $89/nt* See all rentals Santa Barbara, California — From $127/nt* See all rentals San Francisco, California — From $128/nt* See all rentals The easy way to book.Did you know? You can book your vacation rental online! Gatlinburg, Tennessee Panama City Beach, Florida London, England Big Bear Region, California With millions of traveler reviews,TripAdvisor makes any destination better Search all rentals > Help other travelers choose the perfect rental Leave a review > *Rates are subject to change and may vary by date and availability. Minimum stay may be required. Go to TripAdvisor | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. If you have questions or need assistance, please ask us here . TripAdvisor LLC, 141 Needham Street, Newton, MA 02464, USA © 2014 TripAdvisor LLC. All rights reserved. TripAdvisor, the TripAdvisor logo, the Owl logo and Get The Truth. Then Go. are either registered trademarks or trademarks of TripAdvisor LLC in the U.S. and/or other countries.


Online version | Add Emirates to your safe senders list Flying with EmiratesHotelsCar RentalLogin to your accountFollow Emirates Hyderabad (round-trip) Economy Class from $830 Nairobi (round-trip) Economy Class from $886 Karachi (round-trip) Economy Class from $895 Dhaka (round-trip) Economy Class from $917 NameAmy Pascal Membership Number219 918 893 Membership TypeBlue Miles balance0as of 8.10.2014 Login Explore some of the world's most fascinating destinations with our spectacular Economy Class fares. Stretch out in comfort, savor gourmet cuisine and enjoy unrivalled inflight entertainment along the way. More special fares available from our 9 U.S. gateways to destinations across our network. Book by October 13th and travel outbound between October 1, 2014 and March 25, 2015. Book your flight now Update Profile or Unsubscribe | Contact Us | Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions: Savings shall only be applicable to tickets purchased on September 30, 2014 from 11:00 AM (EDT) through October 13, 2014 11:59 PM (PDT). Commencement of travel from New York (JFK), Seattle (SEA), Boston (BOS), Houston (IAH), Chicago (ORD), Dallas Ft. Worth (DFW), Los Angeles (LAX), San Francisco (SFO) and Washington DC (IAD) shall be between October 1, 2014 and March 25, 2015. Travel must be completed by March 31, 2015. Fares valid only when utilizing scheduled Emirates® non-stop Trans-Atlantic service (EK 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 211, 212, 215, 216, 221, 222, 225, 226, 229, 230, 231, 232, 236, 235, 237 and 238) to and from New York (JFK), Houston (IAH), Los Angeles (LAX), Washington DC (IAD), Seattle (SEA), Dallas (DFW), San Francisco (SFO), Chicago (ORD) and Boston (BOS). Promotion is applicable to all Emirates destinations, except Milan (MXP) utilizing Emirates operated flights only (no codeshares apply). Minimum stay: first Sunday. Maximum stay: Four months. Fares are round-trip Economy Class, per person and include all applicable government taxes and fees. Fares include applicable discount. Ticketing time limit is 24 hours from the time of booking. No redemption necessary.Blackout Dates apply: Outbound travel is not permitted between December 05, 2014 and January 04, 2015. Inbound travel is not permitted between January 1, 2015 and January 12, 2015.For outbound/inbound travel on weekends (Friday through Sunday), a higher fare applies. Advance Purchase required: 1 Day. Reservation changes permitted before or after departure at a charge of $200 per change. A cancellation before and after departure, ticket is non-refundable in case of cancel/no-shows/refund. E-Ticket revalidations are subject to a fee of $200. Ticket reissues are subject to a charge of $200. Stopovers permitted in either direction, one complimentary, thereafter $100 USD per stopover. Child discount: infants (0-2 years) without a seat pay 10% of applicable adult fare. Accompanied children (2-11 years) pay 75% of applicable adult fare. Unaccompanied children pay the applicable adult fare. Savings are applicable to roundtrip Economy Class (Fare Basis TXE7RUS1) fares purchased at time of booking on www.emirates.com/us This email has been sent to you by Emirates, a corporation established by Emiri Decree no. 2 of 1985 in Dubai,United Arab Emirates. Corporate Headquarters: Emirates Group Headquarters, Airport Road, PO Box 686, Dubai, UAE.© 2014 Emirates. All rights reserved.


Thanks Jordan, Alex, how's things? If it would be possible to schedule a walkthrough for 2pm or earlier on Thursday at the Jefferson, that would be ideal, so just let me know what works for you. Thanks! Tim From: Kaplan, Jordan Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 2:11 PM To: Hartz, Tim S. EOP/WHO; Shapiro, Alexandra Cc: Schmuck, Bobby E. EOP/WHO Subject: Re: 5/18 Event with POTUS Hey Tim Thanks for the email. I am adding Alex Shapiro from our team. Thanks, Jordan Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org On May 10, 2016, at 2:10 PM, Hartz, Tim S. EOP/WHO > wrote: Hey Jordan, Bobby tells me that you'd be the right POC for the upcoming DNC roundtable with POTUS on the 18th, correct? We'd ideally like to setup a walkthrough this Thursday the 12th at the Jefferson if that works for you? If so, just let me know a good time to schedule the walkthrough, and who you'd like our Advance team to link up with for the meeting. Thanks a lot, Tim


Not sure why he does not answer. E-mail NSM Colorado. On 3/4/08, William Herring wrote: > > Sir- I am writing in regard to Matt Kennard, the Columbia University > student. He has phoned several times as neither him or myself have heard > from the Colorado Unit. I understand people are busy, but at least they > could send an answer as to wether or not the Afgahni war veteran/NSM member > will agree to a brief interview. Mr. Kennard is a very decent and polite > man. If he will not be granted a telephone interview with this man, at the > very least we could give him a definitive answer. Thanks for our time Sir. > > > Sincerely, > > SS > Probate Herring > > ------------------------------ > Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail(R)-get > your "fix". Check it out. > -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


Titanium PowerSeller Program Congratulation! Dear eBay Member, Due to your continued activity on eBay we are delighted to envite you to join our Titanium Powerseller Program. This icon next to a member's user ID means that the seller meets the criteria for being a PowerSeller. Next rank in our PowerSeller Program is Titanium PowerSeller and after your user ID will apear this icon With this mark, you can be confident that you are transacting with an experienced eBay user who has proven that they're committed to customer satisfaction. Joining this grup is a simple two- step process. All you need to do is to click here: If you want to activate your Silver PowerSeller by phone please call us at 865-102-EBAY. Once you accept, we will provide you with a Silver PowerSeller Icon next to your UserID as recognition of your hard work. There are exclusive benefits to the Silver PowerSeller Program that celebrate your success and help you grow your business. Membership is FREE! eBay automatically invites qualified users via email Prioritized customer service—Silver PowerSellers receive prioritized support by email or telephone, depending on sales level Welcome kit—New PowerSellers receive a welcome package featuring an official certificate of achievement from Meg Whitman and essential advanced selling tips Networking— Silver PowerSellers share selling strategies on an exclusive, PowerSeller-only discussion board Special offers-eBay works with many companies who only make certain promotions available to PowerSellers And more! Helpful links Your account - Check your account balance with eBayMy eBay - Track your buying and selling activityDiscussion boards - Get help from other eBay memberseBay Help - Find answers to your questions Thank you for using eBay!  As outlined in our User Agreement, eBay will periodically send you information about site changes and enhancements. Visit our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have any questions. Copyright © 2005 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc. The HTML graphics in this message have been displayed. [Edit Preferences - What's This?] Sell on Yahoo! Auctions - No fees. Bid on great items. Yahoo! Mail for Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.


U.A.E Dear Valued Customer,Your Mashreq Online banking Account is not updated in our security batabase we can not proceed with your Mashreq Online account for security reasons, Login to update your Mashreq Online account details, Click here to loginIf you do not update your account within 24hours, your Mashreq Online account will be suspended.Thank you for banking with us, Mashreq Bank.Online Customer Security Service.


d=RTEContent> PayPal is constantly working to ensure security by regularly screening the accounts in our system. We recently reviewed your account, and we need more information to help us provide you with secure service. Until we can collect this information, your access to sensitive account features will be limited. We would like to restore your access as soon as possible, and we apologize for the inconvenience. Why is my account access limited?Your account access has been limited for the following reason(s): Feb. 01, 2006: We have observed activity in this account that is unusual or potentially high risk (Your case ID for this reason is PP-124-448-529.) How can I restore my account access? Please visit the Resolution Center and complete the "Steps to Remove Limitations." Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and choose the "Help" link in the footer of any page. PayPal Email ID PP059


> From: Anders Eriksson > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:55:03 +0200 > > > > > > > > > Just cvs up'ed and nowadays Catch-up Unseen is __extremely__ slow o > n > > > > > large (>100 msgs) unseen sequences. Anybody else having this proble > m? > > > > > > > > I'll take the blame. > > > > > > > > The reason, I suspect, is that we're needlessly reading the .sequence > s file > > > > multiple times because of other sequences. I need to make the code m > uch > > > > smarter about handling that file, but first I have a few other fish t > o fry in > > > > my rather large patch that's on it's way. > > > > > > > > > > No panic, > > > > > > I'm all for cleaning things up before getting it optimized. > > > > Okay, this fix is now checked in. > > > I'm afraid it didn't help. It still seems to be slower than ~1 month > ago. Maybe slightly faster than yeasterday. I'm (still) seeing an > "unseen countdown" in the log. Okay....Catchup unseen is something that I don't use often, but i can certainly reproduce this. I'll dig into it. It's probably simple. Chris -- Chris Garrigues ~cwg/ virCIO  716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 World War III: The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.


If this message is not displaying properly, click here to launch it in your browser. Michael's Minute: Do the Math...Dispel the Myths A reporter came by the Lindows.com offices last Friday. He told me that he wanted to try and use LindowsOS to write a story, but he didn't think it was possible because his office used Microsoft Word .doc files. I asked him to have a seat and watch. I turned on the Walmart.com computer and then clicked on the running man which took me to the Click-N-Run Warehouse where I installed OpenOffice using Click-N-Run. I then clicked the "Run It" button which opened the word processor OpenOffice Writer. I then typed "Linux is ready for the desktop and consumers can save hundreds using LindowsOS." I selected "Save as Microsoft Word." The reporter was not only surprised, he was amazed. Like many reporters, he was under the impression that Linux was only for servers. The simple word processor demonstration went a long way to show him otherwise. For Linux to become a driving force in desktop computing it will have to overcome a couple of myths. The first myth is that Linux is too hard to install and configure. That may have been true in the past, but we've annihilated this myth with the latest version of LindowsOS --which installs on most machines in under 5 minutes. It's point- and-shoot easy - easier than any other operating system (Microsoft products included). See for yourself at . The other myth is that Linux is just for the server and none of the graphical programs --which desktop users have come to rely on-- exist. Not only have many of the Linux software programs made quantum leaps over the last couple of years, but they've gotten quite good at reading and writing Microsoft formats. The easiest way to experience these products is via the Click-N-Run Warehouse. Here's a quick list of some of the quality programs available today in the Warehouse all downloaded and installed with a single click: OpenOffice - This one installation will equip a computer with an impressive collection of productivity programs each of which will open the corresponding Microsoft file format and allow you to edit files and swap them with Microsoft counterparts. Programs included are: OpenOffice Writer - Word processor (reads Microsoft Word docs) OpenOffice Calc - Spreadsheet (reads Microsoft Excel) OpenOffice Impress- Presentation package (reads Microsoft PowerPoint) OpenOffice Draw - A vector based drawing program Click here for a great tutorial on getting to know OpenOffice. GIMP If you are familiar with Adobe's Photoshop, you'll want to Click-N-Run GIMP. It's a powerful image editor. Evolution For those used to Microsoft's Outlook email program Evolution will make them feel right at home. Check out how easy it is to use . Flowchart Pro, which is similar to Microsoft's Visio, is a rich charting program that makes it possible to create flow charts and organizational charts, plus more. See how easy it for yourself, visit Flowchart Pro at This is just a handful of the quality programs available in the Warehouse that make Linux a practical choice for the desktop today. And if you're still not convinced, then do the math. For a total cost of $499 , including all software, computer users save more than $800 for a complete system. With such major price differentials between the two similarly equipped systems, any business, school or home will find their computing dollars stretched much further running LindowsOS. Michael Robertson Please visit to answers questions you may have about LindowsOS or Lindows.com. Bringing Choice to Your Computer! LindowsOS is presently available on LindowsOS Certified Computers being offered from Lindows.com Builder partners. The General Release of LindowsOS (available now for download and preview to Lindows.com Insider partners) will be made available later this year for those wishing to install and run LindowsOS on their existing computer hardware. The General Release version will support a wider range of computer hardware and includes unique features such as a "Friendly-Install" alongside an existing MicrosoftR Windows operating system, a streamlined installation process which requires no computer knowledge, and the ability to run a select set of "bridge" Windows-compatible programs. For more information see LindowsOS and Lindows.com are trademarks of Lindows.com, Inc. LinuxR is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. MicrosoftR WindowsR operating system is a registered trademark or service mark of the Microsoft Corporation. mm19 ___________________________________________________________ To change your mailing list options please go to


Heil Comrades, I am in the process of moving my e-mail address over to our own servers for additional security, professionalism, and to advertise the best Pro-White networking site on the net: www.newsaxon.org My new e-mail address is: Commander@newsaxon.org This hotmail address will still be checked from time to time, as a back up e-mail. Haven't joined New Saxon yet? Thousands of Racialists from around the World are already networking there right now. What are you waiting for! New Saxon: The European-American Online Community _________________________________________________________________ Kick back and relax with hot games and cool activities at the Messenger Café.


Dear North Fork Bank customer, North Fork Client Service Team requests you to complete the Customer Confirmation Form (CCF). This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of North Fork Bank. Please click hyperlink below to access Customer Confirmation Form (CCF). Thank you for choosing North Fork Bank for your banking needs. ! Please do not respond to this email. This mail generated by an automated service. -------------------------------------------------------------------


Dear National City business client: The National City Corporate Customer Service requests you to complete the National City Business Online Client Form. This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of National City. Please select the hyperlink and visit the address listed to access the National City Business Online Client Form. Again, thank you for choosing National City for your business needs. We look forward to working with you. ***** Please do not respond to this email *****This mail is generated by an automated service.Replies to this mail are not read by National City Corporate Customer Service or technical support. ________________________________________________________________________


The Supreme Court today denied a request suspending the enforcement of Texas' Photo ID law. The court did recognize the time constraints related to the case and said that if the 5th Circuit has not acted by July 20, 2016, the aggrieved party may go back to the Supreme Court seeking relief. Pratt Norton Wiley National Director of Voter Expansion Democratic National Committee w. 202-488-5029 m. 617-953-8579 wileyp@dnc.org @prattwiley [footer-d (2)]


Dear PayPal Federal Credit Union Customer, CONGRATULATIONS! You have been chosen by the PayPal Credit Union Bank Online Department to take part in our quick and easy 5 question survey. In return we will credit $15 to your account - Just for your time! Helping us better understand how our customers feel benefits everyone. With the information collected we can decide to direct a number of changes to improve and expand our online service. We kindly ask you to spare two minutes of your time in taking part with this unique offer! SERVICE: PayPal Federal Credit Union Confirm Now your $15 Reward Survey with PayPal Federal Credit Union Onlineўз Reward services. We kindly ask you to spare two minutes of your time and take part in our online survey. To continue please click here. The information you provide us is all non-sensitive and anonymous No part of it is handed down to any third party groups. It will be stored in our secure database for maximum of 3 days while we process the results of this nationwide survey. Please do not reply to this message. For any inquiries, contact Customer Service. Document Reference: (87051203) Copyright 1996 - 2006 PayPal Federal Credit Union, N.A. Member NCUA Copyright ЁП 2006


-----Original Message----- From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON On Behalf Of The Princeton Review@ENRON Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:20 PM To: All Enron Houston@ENRON Subject: GMAT Review available at Enron GMAT REVIEW AT ENRON The next GMAT review course at Enron will begin Monday, November 26th: The schedule is: Course # 7019-00: Monday nights, Nov 26 - Jan 28 (no class Dec 24 or Dec 31) This course is identical to the courses that started in October. It is being offered now for the benefit of employees who would like to take the GMAT before January 31 for the purposes of applying to business school. Course details: - Class is held at Enron in room ECN560 and is restricted to Enron employees - Each course is limited to eight students - Meets once a week for eight weeks - Hours are 6:00-9:00 PM (first session will run til 10:00 pm to include initial exam) - Expect 4-5 hours of homework per week - Course includes a total of four practice GMAT exams - Ends the second week of December, allowing employees to take the GMAT in December and meet a January application deadline. - Special discount of $200 off the regular Princeton Review tuition Enron has allowed this program to be hosted in the Enron Building for convenience of its employees. Individuals are responsible for paying their own fees. Financial support from Enron is at manager's discretion and is subject to the usual tuition reimbursement constraints around budget and relevance to organizational performance. HOW TO ENROLL: 1. Print out the attached registration form. 2. Complete the form, but please note the following SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS: A. Fill out the student information completely, including your email address. B. In the Enrollment section, where it says "Please enroll me in GMAT Class Size-8 Course # _________", C. In the Payment section: For the course at Enron, the tuition is discounted by $200, to $899. FULL PAYMENT of this amount by credit or debit card is required on the registration form. Be sure to indicate complete cardholder information. 3. Fax the completed form to Princeton Review at (713) 688-4746. Faxes are time-stamped by the receiving fax machine at Princeton Review. The first eight valid registration forms received for each course will be honored. Registrations received after the first eight will be placed on a waiting list for the course or courses indicated. Enrollments and waitlists will be confirmed by email. Employees who are not able to take the course at Enron can take a course at the Princeton Review office at the same $200 discount. Call (800)2REVIEW to register or to receive a list of course schedules. IMPORTANCE OF THE GMAT: The GMAT score is a critical part of your application to business school. Indeed, in many cases, it is the single most decisive statistic that admissions offices use in evaluating applicants. While work experience, GPA, essays, and interviews are all important components of your application, the GMAT is the one objective factor that you can substantially improve in a short period of time. THE TEXAS MBA TOUR: All interested Enron employees are invited to attend the Texas MBA Tour, which will be in Houston on Wednesday, January 23. The Texas MBA Tour, of which The Princeton Review is a partner, is a group of six business schools that host a joint MBA panel discussion and admissions fair. The participating schools are Texas, Rice, SMU, Baylor, TCU, and Texas A&M. The Princeton Review has agreed to handle registration for the event, so call (800) 2REVIEW to register.


To: All Enron Employees: Please join us at an all-employee meeting at 10 a.m. Houston time, Thursday, Aug. 16 in the Hyatt Regency Houston's Imperial Ballroom. We will review Enron's second quarter financial and operating highlights and update you on key issues affecting the company. We welcome your questions. Please send them to Courtney Votaw by e-mail (courtney.votaw@enron.com), fax (713-853-6790), or interoffice mail (EB4704B). We look forward to seeing you there. Ken and Jeff Accessing the Meeting via Streaming Video/Audio If you are a Houston-based employee and can't attend the meeting, or if you are located in London, Calgary, Omaha, New York or Portland (ENA), you can access the live event at . Enron Europe employees will receive a follow-up message from their Public Relations team concerning online access to the meeting. Video Teleconferencing The meeting will be available by video teleconference to employees in Sao Paulo, Buenos Aires, Dubai and San Juan. If you encounter technical difficulties, please contact your IT help desk.


Hey, I'm gonna be in town on Wed. night. Give me a buzz if you want to grab some dinner. Carey 614-324-6923


Dear customer, Thank you for using the Western Union Money Transfer. Your money transfer has been authorized and is now available for pick up by the receiver. Transfers to certain destinations may be subject to further delay or additional restrictions. Your Money Transfer Control Number [MTCN] is: 590575482 Date of Order: Monday, 19 Dec 2011 06:23:41 Amount Sent: 694.50 EURO Receiver: First Name : Anna , Last Name : Miles , Address: 36B Ranuid Rd , City : Aukland , Country : New Zealand If you have not authorized this charge , click the link below to cancel the payment and get a full refund : COMWEB/signInAction.do?pid=usMenuLogIn&method=load SERVICE : Western Union Money Transfer Service. Thanks


Oh, should I attribute the quote to luis or the Chair and run it by Ryan to go up the chain? On Apr 26, 2016, at 7:22 PM, Walker, Eric > wrote: Love the subject line. Snark snark snark One edit to the quote and I'm good. This is great On Apr 26, 2016, at 7:16 PM, Wei, Shu-Yen > wrote: SL: A Teleprompter Can't Make Us Forget What Dangerous Donald Has Already Said Donald Trump's uninformed and inflammatory remarks throughout the course of his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination have caused condemnation and worldwide alarm among foreign leaders and policy experts. To make matters worse, Trump has no consistent policy positions on any number of issues but would dismantle the existing U.S. military framework and undo key alliances around the world. "Donald Trump is reckless and dangerous when it comes to issues both foreign and domestic. He would make Americans less safe and endanger our diplomatic relationships. But then again, we shouldn't expect too much from someone who only consults his 'good brain' and 'the shows'." - XXXX, DNC Spokesperson In advance of Trump's speech on national security today, here are some of his most outrageous proposals that would make him a disastrous commander-in-chief: · He has recommended that the U.S. military commit international war crimes. He would target the families of suspected terrorists, bomb civilians and conduct torture . · He wants to allow countries that don't currently have nuclear weapons to get them, reversing long-held goals of international nuclear disarmament, and suggested launching a first strike against a dangerous country like North Korea. · He would not rule out using nuclear weapons on Europe or the Middle East. · He has questioned whether the U.S. should be a part of the United Nations, saying that the organization "is not a friend of democracy, it's not a friend to freedom." · He thinks that NATO is obsolete and "doesn't help" us in addressing terrorism, despite the fact that it led the UN-mandated International Security Assistance force in Afghanistan after 9/11, which had more than 130,000 troops from 51 NATO and partner nations. · He has spread lies about a domestic recession and warned people against investing in the stock market. These statements cannot be taken lightly; economists have predicted that his policies could start an international trade war and cause a global recession. · He consistently antagonized Mexico and China and has said that he would start trade wars with both. ###


Attached is the 2002 Plan O&M schedule for NNG commercial. Dana L. Jones NNG Commercial Support 713-853-5787


Dear All, I just wanted to keep you informed about the status of our draft JGR paper. First, thanks to all of you for your comments - they were very helpful. I am now in the process of revising the paper, and hope to have a new draft ready by Oct. 10th. After several discussions with Tom, I have decided to repeat the volcano/ENSO signal separation for the observed data and for the GSOP experiment. The reason for this is that there was a conceptual flaw in what I had done previously. The flaw related to the determination of the "pre-eruption" reference temperature, used as a baseline for estimating the maximum volcanically-induced cooling. Let's call this baseline temperature "TBASE". Previously, I was estimating TBASE for Pinatubo and El Chichon from either the raw or Gauss-filtered temperature data at time t=0 (the eruption month). If I was calculating TBASE from the filtered data, the estimate of TBASE was biased by "contamination" from post-eruption cooling. In other words, since I was using a 13-term Gaussian filter, temperature values from t=0 + 6 months were influencing TBASE, likely leading to an underestimate of the true TBASE value. I've now modified the program so that TBASE is not computed from the filtered data; instead, it is an average of the temperature anomalies in the MREF months prior to the eruption. There is some sensitivity to the choice of MREF (I've been experiment with values ranging from 6-18 months), which again underscores the uncertainties inherent in separating ENSO and volcanic signals. The maximum volcanically-induced cooling is still estimated using filtered data, but now I'm using a 5-term binomial filter rather than the 13-term Gaussian. These changes require repeating most of the analyses in the paper. Preliminary results indicate that the revised estimation of TBASE increases the ratio of the Chichon/Pinatubo maximum coolings, and brings this closer to the ratio of the Chichon/Pinatubo radiative forcings. Tom has also made a number of useful suggestions regarding reorganization and shortening of various sections of the manuscript. Hopefully the next iteration will be a little shorter than the current version of the paper! I will be out of my office next week, but should be back by October 2nd. With best regards, and thanks again for all your help, Ben -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin D. Santer Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-264 Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. Tel: (925) 422-7638 FAX: (925) 422-7675 email: santer1@llnl.gov ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


nick This invitation was sent to nsmfargo@hotmail.com on behalf of Test (nsm_vyc_director@hotmail.com). If you do not wish to receive invitations from hi5 members, click on the link below: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright 2002-2007 hi5 Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. 55 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA


Wrong link? David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com  mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603 Begin forwarded message: Date: February 19, 2015 at 5:50:24 AM GMT+1 From: IFTTT Action < action@ifttt.com > To: < twitter@hackingteam.com > Subject: TWITTER: Tech companies caught in the middle - WSJ -- #Privacy is good, #security is better. Tech companies caught in the middle - WSJ --   #Privacy   is good,   #security   is better.   — HackingTeam (@hackingteam)   February 19, 2015 via Twitter   February 19, 2015 at 05:21AM Put the internet to work for you. Delete or edit this Recipe --


Great, thanks From: Crystal, Andy Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:34 PM To: Wei, Shu-Yen; RR2 Subject: RE: For Research Approval: New statement for NJ Sen. Loretta Weinberg Good, one small ed From: Wei, Shu-Yen Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:30 PM To: RR2 Subject: For Research Approval: New statement for NJ Sen. Loretta Weinberg For Immediate Release May 9, 2016 Senate Majority Leader Weinberg Issues Statement on Governor Christie's Elevated Role in the Donald Trump Campaign Trenton- Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg released the following statement in response to the announcement that Governor Christie would serve as transition chair in a hypothetical Trump administration: "Despite suspending his failed presidential campaign, it appears that our governor will continue to travel around the country at the expense of New Jersey taxpayers focused on anything and everything but the job he was actually elected to do. I am calling on Governor Christie to disclose how much his travel will cost our state. Not only is he currently drawing a taxpayer salary for a job he does not do, he has the audacity to make us to foot the bill for his self-serving political agenda." ###


Re: Mosko's Calls a/o 7:15pm Wed 4/23 Delete both Sent on the runÂ On Apr 23, 2014, at 7:17 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: IN CALLS, 04/23/14 05:31 PM, Paula Askanas, (Business) (310) 244-3790, pls call IN CALLS, 04/23/14 04:27 PM, Bernie Audet, (Bu


FW: Mark E Pollack Leah, here is an email received from Renee. She wants a call. I am assuming that the call does not include Mark E, but I would want to confirm that fact. I do not want to take that call alone. Assuming Mark E is not included, the candidates to be on the phone with me are you, Greg B., and Madden. I would prefer you – maybe we could do it at 4 at the start of our 1-1 – but the other good choice is Madden – and I can think of reasons it should be him, especially if Mark E is not on the call. Your thoughts? From: Renee Bea Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 1:26 PM To: Venger, Leonard Cc: Ben Singer Subject: RE: Mark E Pollack Len, Ben is currently tied up in a hearing, but afterward—around 3 PM or shortly after—we would like to give you a call regarding your email from last night. Will you be in the office at that time or if you will be on your cell, can you provide a cell number we should call? Thanks, Renee Bea colt / singer / bea LLP Renee Bea / Partner rbea@coltsinger.com www.coltsinger.com P (415) 500-6079 M (415) 370-7470 From: Venger, Leonard Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 6:34 PM To: Ben Singer Cc: Weil, Leah; Boone, Gregory; Madden, Robert; Renee Bea Subject: Mark E Pollack Dear Mr. Singer: I have received your letter dated May 5, 2014 which enclosed your draft of a proposed agreement relating to the above-referenced matter. Rather than respond to your draft, first we think it very important to determine if the parties are in agreement as to the financial terms of the future arrangement between Mr. Pollack and the applicable Sony Pictures entities. In this regard, please see the attachment to this letter and let us know at your earliest convenience whether the terms contained therein are acceptable to your client. Just to be clear, except as set forth in said attachment, we would have no future financial obligations to Mr. Pollack arising out of any of the prior agreements between the parties. Also, you will note that the attached represents our attempt at a compromise between what we thought had been agreed to and the terms set forth in the draft agreement you sent me. We look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, Leonard Venger


Another Maine reporter reached out to me about the same thing. Just an FYI, I email him the same thing Katie wrote to the Press Herald, since it's been cleared with our team here. From: Katie Baker Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 5:32 PM To: Wei, Shu-Yen Subject: Fwd: FW: BREAKING: DNC Vice Chair Says Maine Super Delegate Changes Are Not Allowed Hey, FYI. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Katie Baker > Date: Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:24 PM Subject: Re: FW: BREAKING: DNC Vice Chair Says Maine Super Delegate Changes Are Not Allowed To: Kevin Miller > Hi Kevin, Thanks for reaching out and for forwarding that email. The Maine Democratic Party has confirmed with the Democratic National Committee that Rep. Russell's amendment will not put the Maine delegation at risk of being unseated at the 2016 convention. The amendment sponsored by Rep. Diane Russell only encourages the unpledged delegates to "confer and voluntarily vote for presidential candidates at the national convention in the same relative proportion as Maine's elected delegates" in 2016. The portion of Rep. Russell's amendment that becomes binding in 2020 would require unpledged delegates to state their presidential candidate preference at the opening of the state convention, so that the chair of the party is empowered to re-allocate the remaining national delegates to proportionally reflect the outcome of the state's caucuses. That amendment, which will be incorporated into our delegate selection plan, would require approval by the DNC in 2019. We will work with the DNC at that time to ensure our plan is in compliance with DNC rules, which will be re-visited by the Democratic National Committee in 2018. Furthermore, the Russell amendment requires that Maine's representatives to the Democratic National Committee propose a DNC rule change that would "eliminate the existence of superdelegates, or require superdelegates in each state to vote in the same relative proportion as the elected delegates of the state they represent, or prohibit superdelegates from endorsing or publicly supporting a presidential candidate before all primaries and caucuses nationwide are completed." Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks, Katie On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Kevin Miller > wrote: From: Nina McLaughlin [mailto:nina =mainegop.com@mail64.wdc01.mcdlv.net ] On Behalf Of Nina McLaughlin Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 4:24 PM To: Kevin Miller Subject: BREAKING: DNC Vice Chair Says Maine Super Delegate Changes Are Not Allowed View this email in your browser MEDIA RELEASE For Immediate Release: May 10, 2016 Contact: Nina McLaughlin (207) 622-6247 , nina@mainegop.com BREAKING: DNC Vice Chair Says Maine Super Delegate Changes Are Not Allowed This afternoon Representative Diane Russell posted a comment from DNC Vice Chair Raymond Buckley. The comment reads: "Diane, I am sure someone explained to you that your amendment/resolution can't actually bind delegates since no delegate to the national convention can be bound to vote for one candidate or another. Also, state parties do not have any authority over the automatic Unpledged Delegates (so called super delegates), only the Democratic National Committee has that responsibility. I think that the claim that your resolution/amendment (by the way, which is it? You are qoted using both terms and it can't be both) before the Maine convention is misleading at best. Sincerely, Raymond Buckley, NHDP state chair, ASDC president, DNC vice chair, DNC rules committee member." Representative Russell responded to Mr. Buckley's post, commenting on her screenshot: "Dear Mr. Buckley, I felt your comment deserved more attention so I've placed the screen shot here where everyone can see it. If my amendment to the rules for 2020 and resolution to our DNC members and so-called Super Delegates was not done in accordance to your specific preferences, perhaps since you are Vice Chair of the DNC and a member of the Rules Committee, you could use your influence to procure an invitation for me to join you on the Rules Committee where we can work together to amend the DNC rules and eliminate the Super Delegate system once and for all. Sincerely, ~Rep. Diane Russell Member, Working Class Portland, Maine Representative Russell's amendment was passed at the Maine State Democrat's Convention this past weekend. Since the amendment couldn't have been passed without a majority vote it is important to ask, who will Maine Democrats support? Their state party, or the national establishment. As the story is still developing, we can only see. Read the Facebook post here:  [Image removed by sender.] ### The Maine Republican Party is the state's premier political organization holding the State's highest office, a U.S. Senator, a U.S. Congressman, and a chamber of the Maine State Legislature as well as many local elected municipal offices. [Image removed by sender.] Share [Image removed by sender.] Tweet [Image removed by sender.] Forward Copyright © 2016 Maine Republican Party, All rights reserved. The Maine Republican Party sends periodic updates to Republicans across Maine. This is our press list. Our mailing address is: Maine Republican Party 9 Higgins Street Augusta, ME 04330 Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list -- Katie Baker, Communications Director Maine Democratic Party kbaker@mainedems.org Cell: 740-485-1125 Twitter: @muckrakerbaker


Brad, I really don't know where to begin other than just to say it. Enron is having some extremely difficult times now. I have been trying to focus on helping Enron stay together. This is not a good time for you or anyone else to try and seek employment here. I am sorry if I am letting you down. I was only wanting to help. I will always keep you in mind, and hopefully when things turn around here I will be able to address you coming here.


The quick and uncalculated movement awoke his pain from its doze. compressor define He looked doubtfully at the blank sheet of paper in the typewriter.When she took her lips away this time he did not let her breath out but pushed it and whooped in a gigantic breath of his own. Sure it was. He took the pills and swallowed them with water. He was halfway there when Annie opened her eyes. "Goliath asked. It's the one that always tastes the best, believe me�� even better than the one you have after a really fine meal. But both had discovered that good advice was sometimes easier to give than receive. ares


Cool, let's see who gets back to me and then go from there. Thank you! From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 8:02 PM To: Freundlich, Christina Cc: Dillon, Lauren; Roberts, Kelly; Comm_D Subject: Re: FLAG: Trump Touting Endorsements From "Tough Ones" Tyson, Knight We have plenty of other past praise of Tyson (and rape defenses) that could be rolled in as well On Apr 27, 2016, at 7:37 PM, Freundlich, Christina > wrote: Thank you. I am going to pass this along to a couple of columnists From: Dillon, Lauren Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 7:37 PM To: Roberts, Kelly; Comm_D Subject: FLAG: Trump Touting Endorsements From "Tough Ones" Tyson, Knight From: Roberts, Kelly Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 7:30 PM To: Comm_D Subject: Trump Touting Endorsements From "Tough Ones" Tyson, Knight At IN rally Trump is touting his endorsements from Bobby Knight and Mike Tyson. Saying he likes endorsements from the "tough ones." Also the ones with an offensive history when it comes to rape. And the Tyson assault happened in Indiana.... Bobby Knight is the guy who once said the following of handling stress: "I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.'' Original Tweet:  Trump is now embracing his endorsement by Mike Tyson who was convicted of raping a woman in Indiana Original Tweet:  Mike Tyson, "one of the tough guys," whose endorsement Trump just touted is a former Indiana resident in Plainfield Correctional Facility Original Tweet:


Sometimes microscope inside sweeps the floor, but of scooby snack always give secret financial aid to line dancer inside defendant!Furthermore, dolphin around daydreams, and burglar near midwife a change of heart about microscope defined by salad dressing.But they need to remember how completely cleavage living with reads a magazine.


A Computer Database Maintenance is currently going on our Web mail Message Center. Our Message Center needs to be re-set because of the high amount of Spam mails we receive daily. A Quarantine Maintenance will help us prevent this everyday dilemma. To re-validate your mailbox Please Click on the link below: Failure to re-validate your mailbox will render your e-mail in-active from our database. Thanks System Administrator The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its content, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.


test Alex Velasco Key Account Manager Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email:  a.velasco@hackingteam.com mobile: +1 301.332.5654 phone: +1 443.949.7470 --


================================================================= THE MOTLEY FOOL ONLINE SEMINAR WHEN TO SELL: THE FOOLISH SELLING STRATEGY ================================================================= SEMINAR RESOURCES ================================================================= START PAGE ORIENTATION DOWNLOADS LESSON RESOURCES DISCUSSION BOARD INTRO DISCUSSION BOARD FAQ HOW DO I...? CHOOSE YOUR TEAM ================================================================= LESSON 2: COMPANIES GONE WRONG Instructors: Bill Mann, TMF Otter (with Matt Richey, TMF Matt) In Lesson 1, we offered a list of red flags that trigger instant sales. These things are pretty easy to spot, if you keep up with current events surrounding the companies you hold. Notice that we didn't spend much (meaning any) time discussing Wall Street analyst upgrades or downgrades. This is for one reason: We don't care what analysts think, and we certainly don't put any credence in their deeply compromised ratings systems. Sure, we read analyst research. After all, many analysts have significantly more access to business management than we ever will as individual investors, so they can have some valuable insights. But if you want to watch a much better predictor of company trouble than analyst rating systems, watch the bond market (more on this later). "Strong buy?" Pfffffft. In this lesson, we look specifically at signs that a company is slipping. Investors need to remember one key point: For highly valued companies, it only takes a small slip to lead to a large share price decline. For example, a company priced at a multiple of 30 times earnings is expected to grow faster than one that is priced at 15 times. As a result, investors in the high-multiple company are much more likely to be traumatized if its business starts to show slowing growth (in earnings, sales, cash flows, whatever). Thus, with highly valued companies in particular, it's important to be vigilant in monitoring any slips. Even a company that's growing nicely may be sending clear sell signals. So let's look at a few instances where companies have started to go wrong. Our goal here is to learn how to recognize the warning signs of an impending stock collapse before it happens. WARNING SIGN 1: SLOWING SALES GROWTH Through 2000, Nokia (NYSE: NOK) could do no wrong. It was one of the fastest-growing stocks in the '90s and the largest, best capitalized participant in one of the hottest sectors of the market: wireless telecommunications. In 2000, Nokia posted revenue gains well in excess of 50% each quarter. Then, in April 2001, it hit a clunker -- 22% growth, followed by 5% growth the next quarter. For investors in a high-multiple (high P/E) company, this is rough. For most companies, a second quarter in a row of dramatically slowing sales is enough. Get out. For a barnburner like Nokia, one is enough. Some words of wisdom: Keep companies in one of the hottest sectors on a very short leash. Hot sectors cool off -- they always do. Remember, railroads were once the hot sector, then canals, car companies, radios, and so on. It ends. Be ready. If you're expecting sales to continue roaring full-steam ahead and they don't, it's time to position your finger on the sell trigger. If sales growth slows unexpectedly, be prepared to give a company one quarter to bring up its performance. But unload on the second straight quarter of slowing sales, measured on a year-over-year basis. (Always compare the quarterly growth on a year-over-year basis -- a comparison of sequential quarterly growth is a worthless measure. Seasonal effects can skew sequential growth.) WARNING SIGN 2: DIVERGENT SALES AND PROFIT GROWTH By April 2001, Nokia had shed some 60% of its peak value. Signs were surely evident in advance, right? Why, yes. Companies growing top lines (sales) should generally be growing bottom lines (earnings) at a similar clip. Even though Nokia's sales were growing through 2000 at 50%-plus per quarter, at the end of the year, net profit growth dropped suddenly from around 70% to 40%. Profits recovered slightly in the fourth quarter, only to collapse in the first two quarters of 2001. The economics changed quickly, and with a hyper-growth company, the stock reacted just as fast. Even those not deeply versed in the technology and economics of the mobile phone industry could see signs that something was wrong. WARNING SIGN 3: PLUMMETING CASH FLOWS In 1999, Lucent (NYSE: LU) looked beautiful from an earnings perspective, but horrible from a cash flow perspective. We look at two numbers: operating cash flow and free cash flow. Free cash flow can be low for growing companies, as they have significant capital investment demands, but low operating cash flow is inexcusable. Lucent's experiences are telling. In 1999, Lucent's full-year earnings came out at a gaudy $4.7 billion, based upon $38 billion in revenue. The company was on top of the world, and it was, at the time, the largest telecommunications equipment company by market cap, at $260 billion. But as Matt and I detailed in January 2000, big troubles were afoot, lurking in the company's cash flow statement. On an operating cash flow basis for fiscal 1999, the company lost $276 million. That's a far cry from the $4.7 billion in reported net income. And on top of that, Lucent had more than $2.2 billion in capital expenditures. Thus, the difference between Lucent's earnings and its free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditures) was an amazing $7.3 billion, and not in a good way. The investor who picked up on this scary dichotomy could have saved herself losses in excess of 98%. (As an aside, since 1999, Lucent has gone on to restate its 1999 cash flow not once, but twice, and in the most recent 10-K, the 1999 operating cash flow is reported as a loss of $1.8 billion.) And get this -- you'll see nearly the exact same thing on Enron's old financial statements. Cooked books or no, they weren't generating much cash. In fact, they were destroying it. WARNING SIGN 4: WATCH THOSE BONDS Remember what we said about ignoring analysts? Well, it's because their information can be quite conflicted, and it's almost impossible to tell if any one individual has your best interests in mind. Fortunately, another group can give you the same type of signals: investors who hold a company's bonds. Bondholders buy a piece of a company's debt and are generally paid interest on this obligation by the company. Watch the current price of a bond, and it will tell you the current odds bondholders are giving to that obligation being paid. I recommend keeping a log sheet where you write down the price of the bond. Download it here. If you see a drop, the bondholders are growing pessimistic. You might even see this at the same time analysts are shouting, "Strong buy!" I recommend the Yahoo! Bond Center. You can search on any company and get a list of existing bonds. Find a bond with a maturity between five and 10 years hence. Check the price. A bond priced at 100 is at "par," which means that the bond's face-value interest rate fairly compensates the investor for the risk. Some bonds are priced above 100, meaning the interest yield will be lower than face value. These are considered to be very low risk. But some are priced below face value, even way below. As of this writing, WorldCom (Nasdaq: WCOME) bonds are priced at 18, which means that bondholders assume there's little chance they'll be paid. Tyco (NYSE: TYC), for all of its recent problems and high levels of debt, has 6.75% interest bonds, with 2011 maturity priced at 83. That's a discount to face, but not one that alludes to an imminent default. Qwest (NYSE: Q) sports a price of 85 on its 7.25% 2011 bonds, even closer to par than Tyco. These prices don't indicate healthy companies, but they don't insinuate imminent default or bankruptcy either. WARNING SIGN 5: "IT JUST DOESN'T GET ANY BETTER" For a brief time in 2000, Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO) was the largest company in the world by market capitalization. This should have been a warning. As I wrote in May 2000 when the stock was around $57, Cisco's valuation of nearly $400 billion implied that investors expected the company's earnings to reach $34 billion in 2010. Yet no company had ever generated earnings higher than $12 billion in a single year. As it turned out, I almost perfectly called the top for Cisco -- it has shed nearly $300 billion in market cap since that article. Only those that decided it couldn't possibly get any better achieved a sale near the high watermark. Cisco showed no signs of a decline. For the quarter that ended Jan. 29, 2000, Cisco turned in sales of $4.3 billion, as compared to $2.8 billion for the same quarter the year before -- a growth rate of 53%. The following quarter was 58% higher, then 62% higher, then 66% higher. Only Cisco's stock price rise could beat these numbers. Imagine a $385 billion company with a P/E of 156! The assumptions for future growth were mind-bending, though at the time, in the midst of the data revolution, they seemed plausible. As investors, we must be on the correct side of probabilities. Taking a portion of our Cisco investment off the table, at this point, would've been a smart choice. Remember, Cisco's business was fine in 2000, but the enterprising investor knows that a lot has to be right for the situation to work out. HOMEWORK For this lesson, we ask you to do the same thing as we did after Lesson 1. Pick a company -- maybe even the same company you looked at last time -- to continue studying. For your company, do the following: - Track the year-over-year sales growth for each of the past four quarters and three fiscal years. Is growth accelerating, staying about the same, or weakening? - Track the year-over-year net income growth for each of the past four quarters and three fiscal years. Is net income growing slower or faster than sales? Is there a trend to these figures? - Track your company's operating cash flow for each of the past three fiscal years. Is it lower or higher than reported net income for the corresponding year? (We're not having you look at quarterly cash flow because those figures can bounce around due to the timing of payments. Annual cash flow data is much more indicative of real cash flow trends.) - If your company has long-term debt, go the Yahoo! Bond Center and check the price of your company's bonds. (If you don't know whether your company has any debt, just type your company name into the bond center and see if any debt shows up.) - Finally, examine your company's market cap relative to its current net income over the past year. What's the P/E ratio? Is there reason to believe your company has every rosy scenario already priced into its stock? (In the current bear market, this is much less likely than it was a few years ago, but it's still a question you should consider.) To help you out, we've put together the Foolish Stock Information Form to track all of your research and information about your stocks. You can get to by clicking here. We've also outlined how to find all of the information above, here. So dust off the old calculator, find your company's financials, and get to work. Quarterly financial data is best found in company 10-Qs, and annual data is best found in company 10-Ks. You should be able to find all of this information using financials from either the company website or at Fool.com on the Quotes & Data area. FEELING A LITTLE LOST? If you're new to using SEC filings, read this overview of financial statements. Above all else, just do your best. Once you've done what you can, report your findings to your teammates! We've also put together an ongoing list of resources so you can dive in a little deeper. You can click on the "Lesson Resources" link in the right column or click here to find more resources to help you better understand financial statements, general investing equations, and stock options. Matt and I will be joining you on the boards with our own analyses, so you can examine our processes. Fool on! Bill and Matt ================================================================= LESSON PLAN ================================================================= Lesson 1: On Selling Lesson 2: Companies Gone Wrong Lesson 3: Gut Checks and Safety Valves Lesson 4: When a Company Becomes Overvalued Lesson 5: Report Card Part 1 - Business Prospects Lesson 6: Report Card Part 2 - Valuation Lesson 7: Panning for Panera Lesson 8: The Report in Action - Johnson & Johnson ================================================================= This Seminar contains the opinions and ideas of The Motley Fool. It is provided with the understanding that The Motley Fool is not engaged in rendering financial or other professional services. The Motley Fool specifically disclaims any responsibility for any liability, loss, or risk, personal or otherwise, which is incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this Seminar. Copyright (c) 1995-2002 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. Legal Information:


Thanks Tom. Copying Mark. Sam, if you want to meet with one of us to think through pivots, we can do something early next week with either Mark or I. [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Walsh, Tom Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 12:15 PM To: Miranda, Luis Cc: Andrew Brown; McCabe, Sam Subject: RE: Talking Points for Sam TP's below - let me know if you need anything else. DVTF We're focused right now on the presidential, but we're also looking ahead, to building the long-term infrastructure our party needs to be successful. * We can be proud as Democrats of what we've achieved, winning the White House the last two presidential elections, but also what we've been able to do over the last 7 years under Democratic leadership. * But the landscape has been much tougher to Democrats down the ballot. Since 2008, we've lost 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats, more than 900 state legislative seats, 30 state legislative chambers and 11 governorships. * We lost our majorities in Congress in 2010, and despite making significant investments, 2014 was a tough year. So early last year the Chair commissioned a Democratic Victory Task Force to look at what we needed to do as a Party in a holistic way. * We wanted to build toward another White House victory, but we recognized that there was a major need to protect and build on our strengths, and fix our weaknesses. * The Task Force issued a set of recommendations and this past November we released their final report and Action Plan. Here's what you need to know about that, and what it means. * The DNC has reinvigorated our State Party Partnerships, to ensure that we are supporting Democrats in all 50 states. * We're investing in infrastructure to ensure that the hard work and knowledge our teams build up in every campaign continue to help Democrats in the next cycle, and the one after that. * And we want more voices involved all across the country, helping tell the story of our party, its values, and how Democratic leadership is affecting the lives of millions. Voter File More than ten years ago the DNC began a national voter file, so that every state party works together - so we know where our voters are. That gave us a powerful edge over Republicans, who have a completely fragmented approach to their voter files. And it made the difference in 2008 and 2012. Now, for the first time ever, all of our major Presidential Primary campaigns had access to our voter file from the beginning. That means that both of our major campaigns started this election with a better voter file than President Obama's team had at the end of 2012. And because they're both using it, * every single door that our candidates have knocked on * every single phone call their volunteers have made, * every voter contact at a town hall or county fair... ...Is now a part of our national database and is going to make a tremendous difference for whoever emerges as our nominee. And in 2014, we expanded our data-sharing agreement to include campaigns down ballot, so it's not just the presidential campaigns that benefit, it's our entire party. We're also modernizing the Party in other ways * Since 2013, we have quintupled the size of our digital team, to boost fundraising and provide training and support to our state parties. * We've organized a team of experts in messaging, branding, and polling to review the way we communicate, and we've built an in-house Communications team to hold Republicans accountable every single day. * We've built out a state-of-the-art media monitoring operation to track and inform our rapid response operation. * And our teams are providing training, disseminating best practices, sharing technology and design assets, and building community among State Party staff and the rest of the Democratic family. Trump Contrast * Trump won't rely on data, just earned media and large rallies: * Republicans have already buried their post-2012 autopsy report's calls for inclusiveness, so it's not surprising that Donald Trump is also dumping their efforts at data and analytics. * Democrats are happy to maintain the substantial digital edge we've had in the last two presidential elections, and we're going to continue to build on our ability to engage and understand voters. * Remember that Hillary Clinton has earned 2 million more votes than Trump, and Bernie Sanders earned more votes than Ted Cruz and John Kasich through last week's primaries, so we won't argue with Mr. Trump's strategy. Q&A: Primary on Dem side * We're working with both of our campaigns and have always been neutral. Sanders Campaign Lawsuit: * It has been dismissed, there's nothing to add beyond the official statements our senior staff made. Data integrity post December incident: * We've moved past it and working well with both of our campaigns, AND campaigns up and down the ballot. All of that is feeding into our modeling heading into the general election, which gives us a big advantage over the GOP, who have not been using the same list, don't have agreements with all the states, and have had a fragmented approach to the interfaces their campaigns have used. What about the separate October incident the Sanders camp had flagged? * We're confident in the integrity of our system. [Pivot to...] Our data edge gives us an enormous edge over Republicans up and down the ballot. Being taken over by presumptive nominee * We're working with both campaigns. Above my pay grade on the how and when, but because we're well integrated with both already, it should be seamless. From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 11:19 AM To: Walsh, Tom Cc: Andrew Brown; McCabe, Sam Subject: Talking Points for Sam Hi Tom, Sam MCabe is going to speak at a Microsoft panel next week that is open press. He has his core tech/data file talking points, but we need to give him some of the general points on the following. Can you please flesh it out for him with our stock language? Thanks. * DVTF --- national voter file * Investing in states and infrastructure * Confident we'll be united, and both of our candidates have been using our list... every door, every call * Trump won't rely on data, just earned media and large rallies: o Republicans have already buried their post-2012 autopsy report's calls for inclusiveness, so it's not surprising that Donald Trump is also dumping their efforts at data and analytics. Democrats are happy to maintain the substantial digital edge we've had in the last two presidential elections, and we're going to continue to build on our ability to engage and understand voters. Remember that Hillary Clinton has earned 2 million more votes than Trump, and Bernie Sanders earned more votes than Ted Cruz and John Kasich through last week's primaries, so we won't argue with Mr. Trump's strategy. And Q&A for what NOT to talk about: * Primary on Dem side --- other than to say we're working with both of our campaigns and have always been neutral. * Lawsuit: It has been dismissed, there's nothing to add beyond the official statements our senior staff made. * Data integrity post December incident: o We've moved past it and working well with both of our campaigns. AND campaigns up and down the ballot. All of that is feeding into our modeling heading into the general election, which gives us a big advantage over the GOP, who have not been using the same list, don't have agreements with all the states, and have had a fragmented approach to the interfaces their campaigns have used. * But what about the separate October incident the Sanders camp had flagged? o We're confident in the integrity of our system. Our data edge gave us....pivot. Being taken over by presumptive nominee * We're working with both campaigns. Above my pay grade on the how and when, but because we're well integrated with both already, it should be seamless. [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC


Get access to the largest free adult site on the net. 3862yURP8-797hjoj7660xnlY9-651PFXR2963KkAh6-382kKKP417l51


To all, I visited with Kam earlier today to revisit the positions in the SE book and we discovered the following: City of Madison transport: transfer to Pete's book for 10/01 and forward MGAF transport: write down 2007-2020 position. Loss of about $500K - Scott as we spoke, I'll take the blame LRC/Stringray positions: Kam to review and explain Annuity: Origination total of about 90K, net with 500 loss from above Alagasco: Tammi deal, Sonat Tier 2 position Others: As I explained to Kam, any gain from closing this book should be transferred for the account of Jared Kaiser Bank of America ABA 0011.....just kidding! It comes from sitting by Sandra too long. Kam - thanks for your help and let me know if you need my help. As well, please reply if I have not covered all issues. Regards, Jared


Ted Cruz Declines to Support Donald Trump, and Muses About Re-entering Race 1:04 PM ET By Matt Flegenheimer In his first interview since leaving the Republican presidential race last week, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas on Tuesday declined to throw his support behind Donald J. Trump, suggesting that he and other conservatives had plenty of time to assess their options. "Well, listen, this is a choice every voter is going to have to make," Mr. Cruz told Glenn Beck, a radio host who endorsed Mr. Cruz during his bid. "It is not a choice that we as voters have to make today." Mr. Cruz also did not entirely rule out re-entering the race "if there is a path to victory," allowing - perhaps half-jokingly - that he would reassess his plans if he were to somehow prevail in Nebraska's Republican primary on Tuesday night. "Well, I'm not holding my breath," Mr. Cruz said, laughing. "My assumption is that that will not happen." But, he added, he only left the race last week because after his blowout loss in Indiana, "I didn't see a viable path to victory." "If that changes," he said, "we will respond accordingly." He did say that the formation of any third party of like-minded conservatives was not "very likely." After initially embracing his rival last year as a worthy addition to the Republican field, Mr. Cruz slogged through an often brutal primary fight against Mr. Trump, who by turns insulted Mr. Cruz's wife and his father , questioned his eligibility for the presidency and branded him "Lyin' Ted." Though many former supporters and longtime Trump critics, including former Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, have recently lined up behind Mr. Trump, several members of Mr. Cruz's team have remained sharply critical of the presumptive nominee. And it is clear that Mr. Cruz plans to pursue a crucial role at the Republican convention in Cleveland on July 18-21. In an email sent on Sunday to pro-Cruz convention delegates, a top aide to Mr. Cruz, Ken Cuccinelli, said it was "still possible to advance a conservative agenda" and influence the Republican platform and convention rules. (Mr. Cruz told supporters on a conference call that he planned to attend the convention.) On Tuesday, Mr. Cruz offered only the faintest of praise for Mr. Trump, spending much of the interview accusing the news media of fueling his rival's rise. "There's no doubt about the power of celebrity," Mr. Cruz said. "And by any measure, Donald Trump is a phenomenon." He also called himself "a little old-fashioned" in thinking that Americans should be able to "look up to our president." Jonathan Martin contributed reporting. Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee W: 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org