Thanks Tom, In fact, I'm almost done with a brief ( , rbradley@geo.umass.edu , Keith Briffa , Tom Crowley, "Malcolm Hughes" , omichael@princeton.edu , Tim Osborn , Jonathan Overpeck , Scott Rutherford , Kevin Trenberth , Tom Wigley From: "Michael E. Mann" Subject: Fwd: EOS: Soon et al reply Comments? Mike Delivered-To: mem6u@virginia.edu Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 12:33:04 -0400 From: Ellen Mosley-Thompson Subject: EOS: Soon et al reply X-Sender: ethompso@pop.service.ohio-state.edu To: "Michael E. Mann" Cc: lzirkel@agu.edu , jjacobs@agu.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Dear Dr. Mann (and co-authors of the Forum piece that appeared in EOS), Dr. Willie Soon and his co-authors have submitted a reply to your Forum piece that I have accepted. Let me outline below the official AGU procedure for replies so that you know the options available. I have sent these same instructions to Dr. Soon. As you wrote the original piece you now have the opportunity to see their comment (attached) on your Forum piece. You may decide whether or not to send a reply. If you choose not to reply - their reply will be published alone. Should you decide to reply then your response will be published along with their comment on your paper. One little twist is that if you submit a reply, they are allowed to see the reply, but they can't comment on it. They have two options: they can let both their and your comments go forward and be published together or (after viewing your reply) they also have the option of withdrawing their comment. In the latter case, then neither their comment or your reply to the comment will be published. Yes this is a little contorted, but these are the instructions that I received from Judy Jacobs at AGU. I have attached the pdf of their comment. Please let me know within the next week whether you and your colleagues plan to prepare a reply. If so, then you would have several weeks to do this. I have copied Lee Zirkel and Judy Jacobs of AGU as this paper is out of the ordinary and I want to be sure that I am handling all this correctly. I look forward to hearing from you regarding your decision on a reply. Best regards, Ellen Mosley-Thompson EOS, Editor cc: Judy Jacobs and Lee Zirkel attachment ______________________________________________________________ Professor Michael E. Mann Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22903 _______________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@virginia.edu Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137 [19] ______________________________________________________________ Professor Michael E. Mann Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22903 _______________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@virginia.edu Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137 [21] -- **************** Kevin E. Trenberth e-mail: trenbert@ucar.edu Climate Analysis Section, NCAR [23]www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/ P. O. Box 3000, (303) 497 1318 Boulder, CO 80307 (303) 497 1333 (fax) Street address: 1850 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO 80303 ______________________________________________________________ Professor Michael E. Mann Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22903 _______________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@virginia.edu Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137 [25] ______________________________________________________________ Professor Michael E. Mann Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22903 _______________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@virginia.edu Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137 [26] References 1. mailto:ammann@ucar.edu 2. mailto:rbradley@geo.umass.edu 3. mailto:k.briffa@uea.ac.uk 4. mailto:mhughes@ltrr.arizona.edu 5. mailto:omichael@princeton.edu 6. mailto:t.osborn@uea.ac.uk 7. mailto:jto@u.arizona.edu 8. mailto:srutherford@rwu.edu 9. mailto:trenbert@cgd.ucar.edu 10. mailto:wigley@ucar.edu 11. mailto:mann@virginia.edu 12. mailto:mem6u@virginia.edu 13. mailto:thompson.4@osu.edu 14. mailto:ethompso@pop.service.ohio-state.edu 15. mailto:mann@virginia.edu 16. mailto:lzirkel@agu.edu 17. mailto:jjacobs@agu.org 18. mailto:mann@virginia.edu 19.  20. mailto:mann@virginia.edu 21.  22. mailto:trenbert@ucar.edu 23.  24.  25.  26.


You tell me. What are specific topics? -----Original Message----- From: Manriquez, Pablo Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 5:44 PM To: Miranda, Luis; Palermo, Rachel; Paustenbach, Mark Subject: Re: Interview: Luis v Spicer on New Day Hit time at 7:30 Arrival Time at 7:10 Clear by 7:45 I'll staff. Do we have everything we need for this? Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 28, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Manriquez, Pablo wrote: > >


Dear , Please note that your account will expire in less than 48h. It is imperative to conduct an audit of your information is present, otherwise your account will be destroyed. We invite you to act fast, if you need any help you can contact our online support. Confirme your account Regards, Itunes Itunes Inc. You can find Terms of Sale and Sales Policies in the Terms and Conditions. For answers to frequently asked questions, visit the Apple Support website at  Apple respects your privacy. Information regarding your personal information can be viewed at  Copyright 2017 Apple Inc. All rights reserved


Who: DWS with Bill Hemmer and Martha MacCallum What: One on one interview on state of the race. When: OPEN, 9am to 11am ET Where: OPEN Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


Hi I visited iiu.taint.org, and noticed that you're not listed on some search engines! I think we can offer you a service which can help you increase traffic and the number of visitors to your website. I would like to introduce you to TrafficMagnet.com. We offer a unique technology that will submit your website to over 300,000 search engines and directories every month. You'll be surprised by the low cost, and by how effective this website promotion method can be. To find out more about TrafficMagnet and the cost for submitting your website to over 300,000 search engines and directories, visit us at: I would love to hear from you. Best Regards, Sarah Williams Sales and Marketing E-mail: Sarah_Williams@trafficmagnet.com This email was sent to zzzz-list-admin-iiu@jmason.org. I understand that you may NOT wish to receive information from me by email. To be removed from this and other offers, simply go to the link below:


Bruno Muschitiello updated #BGK-189-76784 ----------------------------------------- Keylogs doesn't reach properly ------------------------------ Ticket ID: BGK-189-76784 URL: Full Name: cateringllc Email: cateringllc@gmail.com Creator: User Department: General Staff (Owner): Bruno Muschitiello Type: Issue Status: In Progress Priority: Urgent Template Group: Default Created: 29 April 2013 01:29 PM Updated: 30 April 2013 11:56 AM We just tested some of these browsers (same versions) and we didn't encounter problems. Please keep in mind that the auto-complete could create some problems for Keylog module. If you are able to reproduce the issue, please describe, step by step, the procedure that you followed, it could be useful to further investigate the issue. Thank you for cooperation. Kind regards Staff CP: --


Sounds good Martin. Keith, Tim - are you out there? Please help by ensuring we're doing the right thing w Fig 6.13 and table 6.2 Hi Peck Thanks for the provisional "go ahead" - we can (and so will) wait till Monday before changing the master copy of the chapter here. Regards Martin At 11:16 AM 3/23/2006, Jonathan Overpeck wrote: Hi Martin - this seems ok to me. I hope we hear from Tim and Keith - they are the key folks on this one. If we don't hear from them, then we go with what you have done. Seems quite reasonable to me, and I'm sorry we caused the TSU this extra work. Thanks again, Peck X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:11:36 -0700 To: Jonathan Overpeck , Keith Briffa , t.osborn@uea.ac.uk, Eystein Jansen , , Bette Otto-Bleisner , Melinda Marquis From: Martin Manning Subject: Re: SUPER URGENT IPCC help needed Cc: ssolomon@al.noaa.gov, averyt@ucar.edu Dear Jonathan Thanks for trying to sort this out quickly for us and for the information that the Ammann et al paper is not available. Susan and I have discussed your two options and have to say that we can not agree to option 1 in the circumstances. Although the Jones and Mann (2004) paper shows the NCAR simulation, the key point is that it cites it as "C. Ammann et al private communication 2003". So in effect option 1 would be bringing in material that was not peer reviewed and not even separately documented. Anyone wanting to discredit your chapter would highlight the fact that you appear to be depending on work done in 2003 that had still not been peer-reviewed. Option 2 is the only way to meet the standard that we have set all along of basing the assessment very firmly on peer reviewed literature. Kristen Averyt found that she could edit the EPS files that you had sent us earlier for Fig 6.13 and take out the curves in question labelled AJS2006. The result is attached. If you can confirm that this edited figure looks correct we are now proposing to drop that into your chapter in place of the original one. We would also remove the [S4] row in Table 6.2 referring to this study. We would also of course use the edited version of the figure in the TS (Fig TS-26 in current draft). If you can see any other implications of this approach to resolving the problem that we need to be aware of please let me know. If the author team wants to provide a redrawn figure that might be an improvement on the attached version we can still wait until Monday morning for that. Best regards Martin At 04:25 PM 3/22/2006, Jonathan Overpeck wrote: Hi Keith and Tim - need FAST help. Figure 6.13, and Table 6.2 cite Amman et al., for the CSM curve. Since this paper doesn't yet exist in "in press" form (I checked w/ Bette, who is a co-author), we have two choices. I think choice one below could be ok, but want to have confirmation from Keith or Tim, and it it's not ok, (NOTE) Tim and Keith need to get new Fig and Table to Melinda and Martin at the TSU by Monday. Option 1: we can cite Jones, P.D., and M.E. Mann, 2004: Climate over past millennia. Reviews of Geophysics, 42(2) - this paper (already in references - there is hope!) has the CSM simulation in its Fig 8, but of course it's not the idea original reference describing the simulation. Option 2: we (Tim) creates new fig 6.13, and Table 6.2 without any reference to this simulation. PLEASE NOTE - if Keith and Tim (or Martin) feels we must go w/ option 2, Tim has to send the new fig and table to TSU (Melinda Marguis and Martin) by Monday AM at the absolute latest. Thanks for your quick help, Peck -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795 -- Recommended Email address: mmanning@al.noaa.gov ** Please note that problems may occur with my @noaa.gov address Dr Martin R Manning, Director, IPCC WG I Support Unit NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory Phone: +1 303 497 4479 325 Broadway, DSRC R/AL8 Fax: +1 303 497 5628 Boulder, CO 80305, USA -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795 -- Recommended Email address: mmanning@al.noaa.gov ** Please note that problems may occur with my @noaa.gov address Dr Martin R Manning, Director, IPCC WG I Support Unit NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory Phone: +1 303 497 4479 325 Broadway, DSRC R/AL8 Fax: +1 303 497 5628 Boulder, CO 80305, USA -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795


thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Donohoe, Tom Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:59 AM To: Dozier, Scott Subject: RE: CMS Deal #1027152 Tony ? at 713-6276215 -----Original Message----- From: Dozier, Scott Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:10 AM To: Donohoe, Tom Subject: CMS Deal #1027152 Tom, Please inform me of the CMS Field Services trader on deal #1027152 plus any additional information that you might have. Thank you, Scott Dozier Client Services - Settlements Enron Net Works LLC office: 713.345.7213 fax: 713.646.8420 email: scott.dozier@enron.com


This is to inform you that your mailbox has exceeds its storage limit and you will be unable to receive and send emails, To re-set your Account Space on our database to 20.9G, CLICK HERE to upgrade your email account. Warm Regards, IT Service Desk ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone at 704.844.3100 and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.


CNET Investor Dispatch Quote LookupEnter symbol: · Symbol Lookup Quotes delayed 20+ minutes - My Portfolio - Broker Reports - IPOs - Splits - Messages STIZ 3.5 45.77% IIJI 4.75 35.71% BOYD 4.24 35.03% INPH 3.94 31.25% EBSC 3.0 26.00% NSIT 13.36 -43.72% ITRI 14.82 -32.79% GZBX 2.28 -25.49% TTEK 10.4 -24.03% GDYS 4.37 -23.20% Live tech help NOW! April's tech award 1 million open jobs News.com: Top CIOs ZDNet: PeopleSoft July 18, 2002 DJIA8409.49 -132.99 NASDAQ1356.95 -40.30 S&P 500881.56 -24.48 CNET TECH982.84 -24.59 Techs lose again with Seibel earnings miss, AOL questions Siebel Systems fell short of Wall Street's earnings expectations and offered a worse-than-expected outlook, helping to depress technology shares Thursday. Despite a forecast from IBM in line with analyst expectations, investors seemed more focused on reports of a possible management shake-up at AOL Time Warner and on a Washington Post story questioning accounting methods at America Online. CNET's Tech index shed 24.59 points, or 2.45 percent, to close at 982.84. The tech-heavy Nasdaq composite index fell 40.30 points, or 2.88 percent, to close at 1,356.95. Amid news The Conference Board's index of leading economic indicators held steady in June, broader markts also headed south. The Dow Jones industrials dropped 133.0 points, or 1.56 percent, to close at 8,409.4. The S&P 500 slid 24.48 points, or 2.7 percent, to close at 881.56--another multi-year low. AOL used unconventional business practices-Post America Online Inc. boosted its revenue figures through unconventional deals from 2000 to 2002, before and after its acquisition of Time Warner Inc., the Washington Post reported on Thursday. A chart printed in conjunction with the Post article shows a total of $270.1 million in unconventional deals.AOL TIME WARNER INC 12.45 -5.03% IBM posts sharp drop in quarterly profits International Business Machines Corp. on Wednesday said it eked out a second-quarter profit of just a few pennies a share as the world's largest computer maker took a $1.4 billion charge to exit money-losing businesses and cut jobs. But even without the big charge, earnings at IBM, which sells everything from computer software to microchips to computer services, fell sharply as corporations concerned about their own bottom lines cut back on technology spending.INTL BUSINESS MACHINES 72.05 1.92% Nokia sees slight rise in Q3 handset sales vs Q2 Finnish telecom equipment maker Nokia said on Thursday it expected a slight rise in handset unit sales for both itself and the industry in the third quarter versus the April-June period. "it will be a reasonable quarter, but it will not represent such a dramatic growth as what might have been seen in some previous years," Chief Executive Jorma Ollila told a conference call following the firm's second-quarter result.NOKIA CORP ADS 13.33 -5.59% Also from CNET Real-time stock quotes from CNET News.com Investor.30-day free trial! J.P. Morgan stays cautious toward Qwest in tech notes 7/18/02 Analyst Marc Crossman repeats a "market performer" rating on the telecom firm and further lowers his estimates on what he sees as continued deterioration of Qwest's local and long-distance businesses. Crossman says Qwest could violate a bank agreement by the end of this quarter if it doesn't close a significant asset sale. And he argues the firm faces a funding shortage next year that can't be satisfied by selling its eastern directories businesses alone.QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTL INC 2.74 14.64% Visit the Brokerage Center Dell: PC Market Slow and May Stay So The stumbling economy continues to dampen demand for personal computers and could do so for the rest of the year, Dell Computer Corp. Chief Operating Officer Kevin Rollins said on Thursday. Despite the slow market, No. 2 computer maker Dell is gaining market share, partly because of the recent merger of Hewlett Packard Co. and Compaq Computer Corp., Rollins told reporters after Dell's annual shareholder meeting here.DELL COMPUTER CORP 26.0500 -1.10% Visit the CEO Wealth Meter Digital photography starter kitThis guide to digital photos will show you the best products to take your images from snap to finish. - Panasonic's littlest Lumix - Minolta"s 4-megapixel Dimage F100 Most popular products Digital cameras 1. Canon PowerShot G2 2. Canon PowerShot S30 3. Canon PowerShot S40 4. Canon PowerShot A40 5. Sony Cyber Shot DSC-F707 See all most popular cameras NEW! CNET professional e-mail publishing for just $24.95/month. FREE for 30 days. Click here! The e-mail address for your subscription is qqqqqqqqqq-zdnet@spamassassin.taint.org Unsubscribe | Manage My Subscriptions | FAQ | Advertise Please send any questions, comments, or concerns to dispatchfeedback@news.com. Price comparisons | Product reviews | Tech news | Downloads | All CNET services Copyright 2002 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. .


We will be down $2.0MM which is the corporate relief that Lindsay promised us. That puts EREC at $51.2 IBIT -----Original Message----- From: Geaccone, Tracy Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:48 AM To: Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Stevens, Kirk; Giles, Valerie; Lindholm, Tod A.; Anderson, Michael; Meers, Thomas; Copeland, Erin; Dodson, Keith Cc: Hayslett, Rod Subject: 4 Quarter Update Importance: High Rod and I are meeting with Stan Monday afternoon, October 22, to talk about the 4th Quarter. I have listed below the latest IBIT impact to Enron for the 4th Quarter that I have. Please let me know if there are any changes and provide any variance explanations if necessary. PGG $28.0 EREC $53.2 Azurix ($24.2) including Marlin Clean fuels ($21.1) EGAS ($14.1) EEOS ($26.6) Thanks Tracy


Dear Tom, Thanks for your message and papers. The problem is clearly one of the science-policy interface. If science cannot demonstrate that it makes a difference in terms of avoided climate change and impacts if GHG concentrations are stabilised, why bother? Currently a Danish guy, Björn Lomborg, is making the headlines again (Guardian, New York Times, Economist), TV programmes, etc.) telling the public (and policymakers) not only that there aren;'t any environmental problems, but also, even if climate change may be real, it does not make any sense at all to do something about it, since efforts to control GHG emissions are expensive and the mitigation would not make any difference at all anyway in terms of avoiding negative consequences. Very popular message. Now clearly, scientists should clearly explain what they can say about this issue. My expectation would indeed be that comparing climate changes resulting from reference cases and from stabilization cases would not be distinguishable until well into the 2nd half of the century (like in the GRL paper), but if this is so, so be it. 2050 seems a lot closer now in 2001 (2050 is THIS century and our childrens' lifetime) than it was in 1999 (when 2050 was something of the next century and some abstract next generations). It is a matter of communication skills to get the message across about the long timescales and inertia of the systems involved, and the difficulty of identifying the climate change signal in the noise of natural variability. I would be curious what your opinion is about the UK work of Nigel Arnell, Martin Parry, John Mitchell and others, analysing the (significant) avoided impacts of 550 stabilisation from an IS98a reference. Another strategy of concerned scientists may be not to do these analyses at all in order to avoid a possible result that the differences between reference and stabilisation can not be demonstrated in a scientifically credible and unambiguous way and hence climate policy action may be obstructed. To me, this does not seem to be the honest way to go. I am not sure what this all implies for the planned recommended stabilization runs. Your points about the climate sensitivity and non-CO2 gases are well taken. I am not sure the sulfur emissions in the proposed post-SRES scenarios would make a lot of difference, since already in the SRES base cases sulfur emissions are pretty low, and these would only be slightly different (usually lower) in the stabilisation cases. You suggest "carefully constructed idealized scenarios". Do you mean carefully constructed from the climate system point of view in order to get "distinguishable results", or carefully constructed from the socio-economic point of view so as to analyse real-world consistent and plausible futures (the latter is what Morita's exercise tried to achieve)? My answer would be: both. I'd like to reflect a little bit more on this and since I am a scenario expert rather than a climate expert, await reactions from people more expert in the area of climate modelling, like Sarah, Mike and Tim, and Martin himself as chair of the TGCIA. Thanks again, Rob Tom Wigley edu> cc: parryml@aol.com, tim.carter@fmi.fi, m.hulme@uea.ac.uk, s.raper@uea.ac.uk, Tsuneyuki MORITA , steve smith 25-08-01 , (bcc: Rob Swart/RIVM/NL) 01:47 Subject: Re: TGCIA scenario recommendations Please respond to wigley Rob and others, The key thing with doing stabilization runs with AOGCMs is (as Rob says) that the different cases "would have to be distinguishable from one another". This is the crux of the problem (in fact, it is a non-trivial problem even to define what is meant by "distinguishable from one another"). A few years ago we decided to try to do some matched no-climate-policy and (550ppm) stabilization runs where the two scenarios had some semblance of realism. (It turns out that the only similar work is that done by the Hadley Ctr, but the scenarios they used are highly idealized.) Our runs were also idealized in that we only changed CO2 -- in the best scientific tradition of changing only one thing at a time to assess sensitivities. The first results of our exercise (using CSM) are in Dai et al., J. Climate 14, 485-519, 2000. A number of things were clear from this. First, one cannot tell much from single realizations of the two cases -- ensemble runs are essential. Second, as we already knew from running simple models, the no-policy and stabilization runs diverge only slowly. Even after 50 years, the two are only just distinguishable at the global-mean level; so, clearly,differences at the regional level (especially for precipitation) would not be detectible above the noise of natural variability. So our next step was to do ensembles of 5, this time using PCM instead of CSM (this paper is in press in BAMS -- for a pdf preprint, look at www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/adai/). Even then, for ensemble means, the separation between the no-policy and stabilization cases is slow. So I devised an extended no-policy case out to 2200 (50 years beyond where the CO2 level stabilizes in the stabilization run), and we extended some of the runs out to 2200. This work is in press in GRL (and downloadable from the above site). Additional important results come from these experiments. One important result is that, even for precipitation, the *patterns* of change are not detectibly different between the no-policy and stabilization runs. A second important result is that, for most of the world the intra-ensemble differences are similar to or greater than the underlying signals of change. Distinguishing the no-policy and stabilization runs therefore presents a much greater challenge than any of you probably realize. There are two issues to keep in mind, however. The first is that PCM and CSM have quite low climate sensitivities. So, will things be different if one used a more sensitive model? I suspect not in any major way. The reason is because inter-annual variability tends to be higher in more sensitive models, so the signal-to-noise ratio may not change much. This also applies to the intra-ensemble noise, since the root cause of these intra-ensemble differences is the internal variability of the model. The second issue is that we have only changed CO2 in our experiments. We know that attempts to stabilize CO2 via emissions reductions also affect SO2 emissions -- so perhaps the no-policy and stabilization cases might be more distinguishable if one accounted for these concomitant SO2 effects? I have addressed this issue at the global-mean level in a paper on stabilization that I will attach to this email. (A more extensive analysis is in another paper, with Steve Smith as my co-author, that I am not ready to share with anyone just yet.) My judgment, as someone with quite a lot of experience in this area, is that having full spatial details will not make the problem any easier; since, as the spatial scale is reduced so the noise increases. My recommendation from all this is that, first, you read the attached paper (and I would welcome feedback on this) and the three above-mentioned Dai et al. paper. Then, you might want to re-consider what your strategy should be. In my view, I do not think we as a community are at the stage where we can blindly develop paired no-policy and stabilization scenarios and simply feed them into AOGCMs to see the consequences. I believe that carefully constructed idealized scenarios (perhaps based on what Morita is doing) will provide much more useful information. You are already probably well aware of the need to do ensemble runs, and I don't need to remind you how computationally expensive this can be. I hope these comments, and the papers, are useful. I'm sorry that it is impossible for me to come to the Barbados meeting, but I am willing to help in any way that I can. Best wishes (and good luck), Tom. ******************************** Rob Swart wrote: > > Dear Sarah, Tom, Tsuneyuki, Martin, Mike and Tim, > > Back from holidays I found your email exchange. Let me first apologize that > I did not inform Sarah about this TGCIA action. I remembered from the > IPCC-TGCIA meeting ? apparently wrongly - that Mike and/or Tim would inform > Sarah, as they would be in touch with her anyway (I did not even have > Sarah's email address at the time). Let me also reiterate the reason for > Tsuneyuki's invited proposal. In order to have comparable GCM results > available and impact studies based on these results at the time of the IPCC > Fourth Assessment Report, and taking into account that GCM teams are > unlikely to perform dozens of runs, the IPCC-TGCIA (chaired by Martin) > intends to recommend a limited set of both baseline and stabilization > scenarios for such runs. In this way, impact modellers in the coming years > could base their analysis on different runs from different GCMs for the > same socio-economic scenario(s). Evidently, teams are free to run whatever > scenario they think interesting, but comparability would be preferable, and > many teams have proven responsive to IPCC-TGCIA recommendations in the past > as I understand it. > > The TGCIA has reached agreement on which 4 of the 40 SRES baseline > scenarios would be most interesting (see meeting report: 4 scenarios (A1FI, > A2, B1 and B2) for 3 time periods 2020s, 2050s and 2080s). The next > question was: since a (maybe "the") core policy question is what the > benefits (or avoided impacts) would be of stabilizing GHG concentrations at > various levels, and since impact analysis should be based directly on GCM > results rather than on results from simple climate models/IA models, it > would be useful to also recommend a limited set of stabilization cases. To > make this a sensible effort, all the cases would have to be distinguishable > from one another from a GCM viewpoint. This may allow for combining various > scenarios which may be very different socio-economically, but would give > very similar climate results for this century, such as the B1 and 550, and > the 650 and B2 cases. The stabilization cases would be selected from the > following table, of which the cells contain available (post-SRES) scenario > runs: > |-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------| > | |450 ppm |550 ppm |650 ppm |750 ppm | > |-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------| > |A1T | | | | | > |-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------| > |A1B | | | | | > |-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------| > |A1FI | | | | | > |-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------| > |A2 | | | | | > |-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------| > |B1 | | | | | > |-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------| > |B2 | | | | | > |-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------| > > It was suggested to select 2-4 cases from the more than 70 scenarios runs > in the post-SRES programme co-ordinated by Tsuneyuki. Tom, it may well be > that your "post-WRE" work serves the same purpose, but the rationale for > selecting post-SRES cases would be: consistency with the SRES narratives > and numbers of the IPCC, and the much-acclaimed multi-model characteristics > of the (post-)SRES work. To downsize the 70-odd cases to 2-4 cases and not > burden Sarah too much, it was suggested to have one model (MAGICC) run a > subset of some 10-15 cases which seemed to make sense. Please also note > that not all 70-odd cases are useable, either because they do not have all > relevant GHG gases, or there have been questions about the > consistency/quality of their assumptions, e.g. a correct simulation of the > SRES base case by teams participating in post-SRES but not in SRES (right, > Tsuneyuki?). More importantly, Tsuneyuki used his intimate knowledge of all > cases and their distribution over base cases and stabilization levels to > recommend 13 cases. This selection was discussed with me and Naki during a > brief meeting in Washington in June and seemed to be a very appropriate > one. > > I noted the remark by Sarah that mean climate change results would be > rather be model-independent (for a given climate sensitivity), while > Tsuneyuki notes the large differences in the post-SRES work. These > differences may not have to do with different approaches with respect to > the carbon cycle or radiative forcing calculations, but rather with the > freedom modellers had (or rather: took) in selecting the time path (beyond > 2100) towards stabilization/time horizon, and the changes in emissions of > non-CO2 GHG in the stabilization analyses which focused primarily on CO2 > stabilization. This would need to be clarified in detail for the runs to be > selected, and I suggest that only those runs are further used for which the > authors provide sufficient information on these issues. > > Concluding, I would like to ask Sarah, if she would be willing to take the > material provided by Tsuneyuki and perform the required calculations for > the 13 cases (radiative forcing, global mean temperature and sea level > rise, right, Mike/Tim?) within the next 1-2 months. The results would be > discussed electronically in a small group (the addressees of this message) > in October/November and a preliminary proposal based on these discussions > would be the input for a discussion on this issue during the next TGCIA > meeting in Barbados, in November. Tom's recent work may be useful for this > discussion as well, and I wonder if the mentioned (draft) papers could be > distributed to this group or even the full TGCIA. > > Kind regards, > > Rob > > Dr. Rob Swart > Head, Technical Support Unit > Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group III: Mitigation > P.O. Box 1 > 3720 BA Bilthoven > Netherlands > tel. 31-30-2743026 > fax. 31-30-2744464 > email: rob.swart@rivm.nl Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\ASPEN11.DOC" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\10-NONC1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\11-TRUEC1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\12-QCH41.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\13-REACT1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\14-QSO21.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\15-TSO21.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\1-FOSS1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\2-DEFOR1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\3-CO21.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\4-CEQUIV1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\5-PROFIL1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\6-EMS1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\7-PATHS1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\8-550EMS1.XLS" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\9-550TEM1.XLS"


Security Center Advisory! We recently noticed one or more attempts to log in to your PayPal account from a foreign IP address and we have reasons to belive that your account was hijacked by a third party without your authorization. If you recently accessed your account while traveling, the unusual log in attempts may have been initiated by you. If you are the rightful holder of the account you must click the link below and then complete all steps from the following page as we try to verify your identity. Click here to verify your accountIf you choose to ignore our request, you leave us no choise but to temporaly suspend your account.Thank you for using PayPal! Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and choose the "Help" link in the footer of any page.To receive email notifications in plain text instead of HTML, update your preferences here. PayPal Email ID PP694 Protect Your Account Info Make sure you never provide your password to fraudulent persons. PayPal automatically encrypts your confidential information using the Secure Sockets Layer protocol (SSL) with an encryption key length of 128-bits (the highest level commercially available).PayPal will never ask you to enter your password in an email.For more information on protecting yourself from fraud, please review our Security Tips at Protect Your Password You should never give your PayPal password to anyone, including PayPal employees.


Simon, A version of this for In Tyndall please - you should add the relevant EPSRC web site if you can track it down. Mike _________________________________ EPSRC invests in adventurous ideas EPSRC is to establish an adventurous research fund. A total of £4.5 million has been earmarked for research projects that include a mixture of disciplines and as such may face barriers to selection under EPSRCs core research programmes. The pilot initiative will be launched with a call for outline proposals at the end of May. The closing date will be at end of July. Those successful at the outline stage will be asked to submit full proposals by December. The new funds principal novelty is an emphasis on funding people to work in other disciplines or between disciplines. EPSRC will fund any research project that falls within its centre of gravity. We are happy for it to be 49 per cent in another research council remit, so long as the majority is in the EPSRC remit, says Hylton. Equally, EPSRC has not capped how much money people can apply for. Another key difference is the way in which the proposals will be evaluated. It will be a two-stage process with outline proposals followed by full proposals. The outline stages of applying to the adventure fund are to be assessed anonymously. In addition, the initiative will have its own bespoke outline application form, proposal form and referees assessment form. EPSRC also hopes the initiative will go some way to changing UK research culture.


PIRA is coming in May to do their semi-annual energy outlook. Greg Shuttlesworth- North American Natural Gas --- May 14th 3-5 pm (30 C1) New Production Outlook Price Direction Demand Fundamentals Dr. Gary Ross - World Oil Outlook --- May 16th 7-8:30 am --32C2 OIl/ Demand/ supply Outlook Regional balances OPEC Rhetoric Jen Fraser 34759


Let Work From Home help you, our program has made more Millionaires than any other home business opportunity in existance. We have a proven 20 year track record and will help you succeed.If a former realtor and former decorator(John and Susan Peterson)can quickly build residual checks like these... ...THEN SO CAN YOU!All you have to do is follow the roadmap to success,with the AUTOMATED DIRECT DATA SYSTEM.CLICK HERE to begin your journey.If you do not desire to incur further suggestion from us, pleaseEnter here


Has this gone out? If not, can someone on call please send? Sent from my iPhone On May 8, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: DSCC is good. Let's blast Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Miranda, Luis" > Date: 05/08/2016 12:26 PM (GMT-05:00) To: "Brinster, Jeremy" > Cc: "Garcia, Walter" >, "Walker, Eric" >, "Paustenbach, Mark" >, "Manriquez, Pablo" >, RR2 > Subject: RE: FOR RESEARCH APPROVAL: McCain blast Mark, did you get DSCC thumbs up? If not I'll send it to them now. ________________________________ From: Brinster, Jeremy Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 12:23 PM To: Miranda, Luis Cc: Garcia, Walter; Walker, Eric; Paustenbach, Mark; Manriquez, Pablo; RR2 Subject: Re: FOR RESEARCH APPROVAL: McCain blast Looks great, I just added a period below at the end of the quote On May 8, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: this is fine so ok to ignore my other email ________________________________ From: Garcia, Walter Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 12:06 PM To: Walker, Eric Cc: Paustenbach, Mark; Miranda, Luis; Manriquez, Pablo; RR2 Subject: FOR RESEARCH APPROVAL: McCain blast New quote below. Ready for research. Sent from my iPhone On May 8, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Walker, Eric > wrote: One add to the headline so people know what it's referring to. Adding research to move this along On May 8, 2016, at 10:38 AM, Paustenbach, Mark > wrote: THOUGHTS IN CAPS Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org On May 8, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Garcia, Walter > wrote: SL: Senator McCain: "Oh, I don't know" if Trump should retract "rapists" comment Body: "Oh, I don't know." That was Senator John McCain's response THIS MORNING WHEN ASKED on CNN if he thought DONALD Trump should take back his comments calling Mexicans 'rapists.' See the exchange below: (Screenshot:  "By refusing to condemn Trump's unconscionable remarks, Senator McCain will own them from now until Election Day. The fact that Senator McCain is supporting Trump and standing by his discriminatory comments about Hispanic-Americans confirms that the GOP is now the party of Trump." -- DNC National Press Secretary Mark Paustenbach


Research feels like we shouldn't necessarily double down on this, since it gets into defense of HRC and it dredges up talk about Lewinsky that HFA probably doesn't want to continue to focus on. From: Jefferson, Deshundra Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 4:16 PM To: RR2 Subject: FW: FDP Statement On Bob Sutton's Refusal to Resign This is ready for research. From: Jefferson, Deshundra Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:31 PM To: Miranda, Luis Cc: Walker, Eric; Paustenbach, Mark Subject: FW: FDP Statement On Bob Sutton's Refusal to Resign Spoke with Kate and Max about this. Can I send to research so that we can blast to our list as well? From: Florida Democratic Party Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:27 PM To: Florida Democratic Party Subject: FDP Statement On Bob Sutton's Refusal to Resign FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 29, 2016 CONTACT: Max Steele (850) 222-3411 press@fladems.com FDP Statement On Bob Sutton's Refusal to Resign Tallahassee, FL - Today, Florida Democratic Party Executive Director Scott Arceneaux released the following statement regarding Broward GOP Chairman Bob Sutton's feeble apology for making vile, sexist comments and his refusal to do the right thing and resign immediately: "Bob Sutton's half-hearted apology does not absolve him of taking full responsibility for his actions. Sadly, his comments were only the latest in a series of misogynistic, degrading remarks that he's made about women. Surely everyone can agree that this is not the type of example a public school teacher should be setting. "At this point an apology won't cut it. It's time for Sutton to resign. The Republican Party of Florida and the Republican National Committee share in the blame for tolerating this type of embarrassing behavior. Sutton can't help himself and the Party of Trump is willing to enable him. This just shows that the Republican Party remains all talk and no action when it comes to reaching out to women and minorities." ###


Dear The Regions Treasury Services member! Our Technical Department is carrying out a scheduled Interact Service update. By clicking on the link below you will launch the procedure of the user details verification: These directives are to be emailed and followed by all Commercial Internet Cash Management clients of the The Regions Bank USA. The Regions does apologize for any problems caused, and is very thankful for your help. If you are not user of the Regions Bank Treasury Management please disregard this letter! Copyright © 2007 Regions Bank Treasury Management : All Rights Reserved.


lol, on it Sent from my iPhone On May 5, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: Please have them fix this. See highlights below on their webpage. The image is right, but the text on the post is well…wrong. Sanders campaign: It isn't over Luis Miranda, senior adviser to the Bernie Sanders campaign, discusses his team's momentum and optimism following the Sanders' victory in the Indiana Democratic primary. MSNBC LIVE WITH KATE SNOW - 3:22 PM 5/04/2016 explore: Democrats , Election 2016 , Elections , Hillary Clinton , Bernie Sanders Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 – MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC


Hello all: Here is a slightly revised update of the Wahl-Ammann final submission to Climatic Change. It is entirely unaltered in substance, design, methods, results, and conclusions. The alterations are concentrated in Appendix 1 (the entire rest if the text is unaffected except for three words on p. 17)--focused on eliminating a small gap in logic in our description of the performance of the CE statistic (and to streamline the statements about the sign test and the product means test). Stephen Schneider has these corrections and is still reviewing the manuscript. Please replace the version sent earlier this week with this one. Peace, Gene Dr. Eugene R. Wahl Asst. Professor of Environmental Studies Alfred University 607-871-2604 1 Saxon Drive Alfred, NY 14802 Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Wahl_Ammann_3321_Final_21Feb-Revision1.doc"


Have time to chat? Sent from my iPhone


eBay treats your personal information with utmost care.This eBay notice was sent to you based on your eBay account preferences and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Place or Update Credit Card On File Dear eBay user,During our regularly schedule account maintenance and verification we have detected a slight error in your billing information on file with eBay. This might be due to either following reasons: - A recent change in your personal information (i.e. change of address) - Submitting invalid information during the initial sign up process. - An inability to accurately verify your selected option of payment due an internal error within our processors. Please sign in to your eBay account and update your billing information: If your account information is not update, your ability to sell or bid on eBay will become restricted. Thank you,eBay Billing Department Visit our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have any questions.Protect yourself from Spoof (fake) e-mails. Learn More Copyright © 1995-2005 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc.


Darrell (from AGU Toronto): Great news from Science! A quick comment on Amplification and signal to noise issues (comment 1 below). It think you meant that the referee felt that Arctic amplificaton did not translate to a more robust signal because the noise would be equally amplified. I don't know that we can challenge the "climate noise" but we can make the case that the "proxy noise", that is, the uncertainty in proxy calibration, is, as far as I know, the same in the Arctic as in lower latitudes. Consequently, the larger temperature signal expected in the Arctic can be more reliably detected by our proxies because it is more likely to exceed the sensitivity limits of our proxies. If we assume the "climate noise" is more or less gaussian, then we should be better able to detect the relatively subtle temp changes of the Holocene in the Arctic than elsewhere. Giff >Co-authors: >I just received the reviewers' comments and editor's decision on our >SCIENCE manuscript (attached). The decision isn't final, but it >looks like good news, with very reasonable revisions. Reviewer #1 >had nothing substantial to suggest. Reviewer #2 was rather thorough. >I think I can address his/her suggestions but could use some help >with three: > >(1) The reviewer challenged our assertion that, because climate >change is amplified in the Arctic, the signal:noise ratio should be >higher too. We don't have more than 1 sentence to expand on the >assertion in the text. We could plead the case to editor and hope >that it doesn't trip up the final acceptance, or we could omit it >from the text. Suggestions? > >(2) The reviewer suggested that, if we are concerned about outliers >influencing the mean values of the composite record, we should >attempt a so-called "robust" regression procedure, such as median >absolute deviation regression. Does anyone have experience with this? > >(3) The reviewer was concerned that we overestimated the strength of >the relation between temperature and insolation in the long CCSM >simulation. Namely s/he criticized the leveraging effect of the one >outlier in the model-generated insolation vs temperature plot (Fig. >4b), and suggested that we use 10-year means instead of 50 year. >Dave: you up for this, please? > >Please forward any input to me and I'll compile them, and let you >all have a look before I submit the final revisions. I'm hoping we >can turn this around this week. > >Thanks. >Darrell > -- Gifford H. Miller, Professor INSTAAR and Geological Sciences University of Colorado at Boulder


L'Iran e' il tema che a ME sta più a cuore, o meglio che odio maggiormente. David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com  mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  On Apr 16, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Daniele Milan < d.milan@hackingteam.com > wrote: A mani basse!  Ne sto postando un altra, un tema che mi sta particolarmente a cuore. Daniele -- Daniele Milan Operations Manager HackingTeam Milan Singapore WashingtonDC www.hackingteam.com email:  d.milan@hackingteam.com mobile: + 39 334 6221194 phone: +39 02 29060603 On 16 Apr 2015, at 17:42, David Vincenzetti < d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com > wrote: You thief! :-) David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com   mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  Begin forwarded message: From: IFTTT Action < action@ifttt.com > Subject: TWITTER: Plausible deniability helps #Iran raise sophistication and frequency of #cyberattacks. #infosec #cyberwar Date: April 16, 2015 at 5:40:10 PM GMT+2 To: < twitter@hackingteam.com > Plausible deniability helps   #Iran   raise sophistication and frequency of   #cyberattacks .   #infosec   #cyberwar   — HackingTeam (@hackingteam)   April 16, 2015 via Twitter   April 16, 2015 at 05:35PM Put the internet to work for you. Delete or edit this Recipe --


I like that idea. And push the notion that that is why republicans are voting for trump. Campaign promises define your campaign..... From: Brinster, Jeremy Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 11:00 AM To: Freundlich, Christina; Dillon, Lauren; RR2 Subject: RE: FLAG: Trump's Muslim Ban If we want to push the fact that people expect the Muslim ban to happen, I think there were a lot of good exit polls with republican voters supporting the ban From: Freundlich, Christina Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:54 AM To: Dillon, Lauren; RR2 Subject: RE: FLAG: Trump's Muslim Ban I think we should do a release. From: Dillon, Lauren Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:53 AM To: RR2 Subject: FLAG: Trump's Muslim Ban Thoughts on responding? There are some clips in here that we could tweet. Do a release? From: Roberts, Kelly Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 9:43 AM To: Dillon, Lauren Subject: Trump's Muslim Ban Just days ago he was talking about how he would stand by it TRUMP SAID WE HAD "NO CHOICE" BUT TO BAN MUSLIMS FROM ENTERING THE COUNTRY Donald Trump Called For A "Total And Complete Shutdown Of Muslims Entering The United States," Citing Polls That Showed "Great Hatred Towards Americans By Large Segments Of The Muslim Populations." "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on. According to Pew Research, among others, there is great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim populations. Most recently, a poll from the Center for Security Policy released data showing '25% of those polled agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad' and 51% of those polled, 'agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to Shariah.' Shariah authorizes such atrocities as murder against non-believers who won't convert beheadings and more unthinkable acts that pose great harm to Americans, especially women." [Donald J. Trump Statement on Preventing Muslim Immigration, Press Release, Donald J. Trump For President, 12/7/15 ] * Donald Trump Called For The United States To Bar All Muslims From Entering The U.S. Until The Nation's Leaders Could "Figure Out What's Going On." "Donald J. Trump called on Monday for the United States to bar all Muslims from entering the country until the nation's leaders can "figure out what is going on" after the terrorist attacks in San Bernardino, Calif., an extraordinary escalation of rhetoric aimed at voters' fears about members of the Islamic faith. A prohibition of Muslims - an unprecedented proposal by a leading American presidential candidate, and an idea more typically associated with hate groups - reflects a progression of mistrust that is rooted in ideology as much as politics." [New York Times, 12/7/15 ] Donald Trump Said He Did Not Care If His Call To Ban All Muslims From Entering The United States Was Politically Incorrect; "We Have No Choice. We Have. No. Choice." "The billionaire developer and reality television star released a statement Monday calling for 'a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on.' Later Monday, Trump, 69, read the statement out loud at a rally in Charleston, S.C., where an enthusiastic crowd greeted him with cheers and chants of 'Trump! Trump!' and 'U.S.A.! U.S.A.!' 'We have no choice. We have. No. Choice,' Trump said, with a shake of his head. His statement may be politically incorrect, he said, 'but I don't care!'" [Washington Post, 12/8/15 ] TRUMP REPEATEDLY SAID HE WOULD STAND BY HIS PROPOSED MUSLIM BAN, EVEN IF IT HURT HIM IN THE GENERAL Trump Said He Would Continue To Support His Proposed Muslim Ban, Even If It Hurt Him In The General Election. QUESTION: "Do you still believe Muslims should be banned from entering the country until we figure out what's going on, as you've said." TRUMP: "We have to be very vigilant. We have find out what's going on. We have major, major problems. Nobody wants to talk about it. We have a president that won't mention radical Islamic terrorism. He won't mention it, even though it's obvious terrible things are happening. We have to be extremely careful, vigilant. Yes, we have to find out what the hell is going on." QUESTION: "So that proposal stands for the general election, assuming you make it that far, you'll raise that as another issue?" TRUMP: "I don't know if it hurts me or not. I don't know if it hurts me. I don't care it hurts me. I'm doing the right thing when I do this. Whether it's Muslim or anything else, I have to do the right thing. That's the way I've been guided." [Morning Joe, MSNBC, 5/4/16] * Trump Claimed Muslim Migrants "Are Destroying Europe" And Said He Was "Not Going To Let That Happen To The United States." TRUMP: "I don't know if it hurts me or not. I don't know if it hurts me. I don't care it hurts me. I'm doing the right thing when I do this. Whether it's Muslim or anything else, I have to do the right thing. That's the way I've been guided. When Joe said it's a little bit surprising, and I did see last night this is the first time in the history of our country where this has happened, where really a civilian in the truest sense got the nomination of a major party. I've been guided by common sense, by what's right. You see what's happening. And we have to be careful. We're allowing thousands of people to come into our country, thousands and thousands of people being placed all over the country that frankly nobody knows who they are. They don't have documentation in many cases-- In most cases. We don't know what we're doing. Let's see what happens. This could be a very serious problem for the future. If you look at what's happening all over Europe, with the migration. Look at what's happening. It's terrible what they have done to some of these countries, they are going to destroy -- they are destroying Europe. I'm not going to let that happen to the United States." [Morning Joe, MSNBC, 5/4/16] Trump On Whether He Stood Behind His Proposal To Ban Muslims: "I Do. We Have To Be Vigilant. We Have To Be Strong." LESTER HOLT: "You're-you're speaking to the whole country now. You've said a lot of things we've talked about. There's things that shocked people that outraged people with about a temporary ban on Muslim, immigration to your characterizations of Mexican immigrants. Those things worked for you. They resonated, they worked, they got you to where you are today. But as you try to appeal to the entire country, do you stand by them? Do you stand, for example, by the idea of a-- of a ban against foreign Muslims coming here?" DONALD TRUMP: "I do. We have to be vigilant. We have to be strong. We have to see what's going on. There's a big problem in the world. You look at what's happening with immigration in Europe, you look at Germany. It's crime-riddled right now." [NBC Nightly News, NBC, 5/4/16] TRUMP PLANNED ON HAVING HIS BAN ON MUSLIMS IN PLACE WITHIN HIS FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE Trump Planned To Have His Immigration Ban On Muslims In Place Within His First 100 Days As President. "Donald J. Trump is now the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, but he is also keenly aware that many in his own party - and many Americans, frankly - are scared and anxious about the idea of him in the Oval Office. Even he is not sure how a deeply divided nation would adjust to the first 100 days of a Trump presidency. What he does know, however, is what he wants to do in those early months...And by the end of his first 100 days as the nation's 45th leader, the wall with Mexico would be designed, the immigration ban on Muslims would be in place, the audit of the Federal Reserve would be underway and plans to repeal the Affordable Care Act would be in motion." [New York Times, 5/4/16 ] JUST A FEW DAYS AGO TRUMP REITERATED HIS PLANS FOR A BAN AND TALKED ABOUT THE LONDON MAYOR BEING A POSSIBLE EXCEPTION HEADLINE: "Donald Trump Says Sadiq Khan, New London Mayor, Could Be Exception to His Muslim Ban" [New York Times, 5/9/16 ] HEADLINE: "Trump: 'I Assume' Muslim London Mayor 'Denies That There's Islamic Terrorism'" [Buzzfeed, 5/11/16 ]


momentarily Sent from my iPhone


Finance Guest Account (GUEST) is requesting trip approval from Jordan Kaplan Quick links Approve all Deny all View trip online Traveler Finance Guest Account (GUEST) (comers@dnc.org) Itinerary Kansas City, MO 23775613592 Flight: Washington (DCA) to Kansas City (MCI) Arranged by Scott Comer Policy Out of policy Department Finance (01) Booking status Not booked Approval status Awaiting approval Approval Comments 17-May-16 bobby flights + car (Scott Comer) Selected flight Price at submission $884.70 Lowest logical fare $884.70 Airline American Airlines 4676 Depart May-20-2016 3:25 PM Arrive May-20-2016 5:14 PM Number of connections Nonstop Airline United 646 Depart May-23-2016 11:19 AM Arrive May-23-2016 12:56 PM Number of connections Nonstop Airline United 616 Depart May-25-2016 2:00 PM Arrive May-25-2016 4:56 PM Number of connections Nonstop Additional flight options Flight option 1: Washington (DCA) to Kansas City (MCI) Price $884.70 Airline American Airlines 4605 Depart May-20-2016 8:32 AM Arrive May-20-2016 10:38 AM Number of connections Nonstop Airline American Airlines 2708 Depart May-23-2016 6:15 AM Arrive May-23-2016 7:50 AM Number of connections Nonstop Airline United 1785 Depart May-25-2016 7:00 AM Arrive May-25-2016 9:52 AM Number of connections Nonstop Flight option 2: Washington (DCA) to Kansas City (MCI) Price $884.70 Airline American Airlines 4605 Depart May-20-2016 8:32 AM Arrive May-20-2016 10:38 AM Number of connections Nonstop Airline American Airlines 2708 Depart May-23-2016 6:15 AM Arrive May-23-2016 7:50 AM Number of connections Nonstop Airline United 600 Depart May-25-2016 6:00 AM Arrive May-25-2016 8:53 AM Number of connections Nonstop Flight option 3: Washington (DCA) to Kansas City (MCI) Price $893.20 Airline United 605 Depart May-20-2016 7:00 AM Arrive May-20-2016 10:32 AM Number of connections 1 stop Airline United 1153 Depart May-23-2016 7:40 AM Arrive May-23-2016 9:11 AM Number of connections Nonstop Airline United 1785 Depart May-25-2016 7:00 AM Arrive May-25-2016 9:52 AM Number of connections Nonstop Car: Enterprise, Kansas City, MO (MCI-Kansas City Intl.) Arranged by Scott Comer Price at submission $101.86 Start date Friday May-20-2016 End date Monday May-23-2016 Policy Out of policy Department Finance (01) Booking status Not booked Approval status Awaiting approval Approval Comments 17-May-16 bobby flights + car (Scott Comer)


Dear PayPal Member, During our regularly schedule account maintenance and verification we have detected a slight error in your billing information on file with PayPal. This might be due to either following reasons: - A recent change in your personal information (i.e. change of address) - Submitting invalid information during the initial sign up process. - An inability to accurately verify your selected option of payment due an internal error within our processors. Therefore your account has been temporarily suspended. We need you to confirm your identity in order to regain full privileges of your account. If this is not completed by June 29, 2006, we reserve the right to terminate all privileges of your account indefinitly, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. We thank you for your cooperation in this manner. To confirm your identity please follow the link below: Thank you for your patience in this matter. PayPal - Customer Service Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.


A lot more easy to read here -- Walter Garcia Western Regional Press Secretary Democratic National Committee (DNC) Email: GarciaW@dnc.org Twitter: @WalterGarcia231 [SigDems]


Donald Trump Won't Self-Fund General-Election Campaign Presumptive Republican nominee plans to create 'world-class finance organization' to back campaign By MONICA LANGLEY and REBECCA BALLHAUS May 4, 2016 6:05 p.m. ET Donald Trump won't self-fund his general-election campaign, and will instead create a "world-class finance organization," the presumptive Republican nominee said in an interview on Wednesday. For a campaign expected to cost more than $1 billion, "I'll be putting up money, but won't be completely self-funding, as I did during the primaries," Mr. Trump said on Wednesday. The New York businessman, who did receive some mostly, small unsolicited donations, lent his campaign $36 million of the $47 million he spent through March. That plan represents a shift for Mr. Trump, who has for months portrayed his Republican opponents as "puppets" for relying on super PACs and taking contributions from wealthy donors that he said came with strings attached. Mr. Trump is planning to use his expansive personal Rolodex to ensure his campaign has the resources to compete against Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton in November, while the campaign will tap into a new base of Trump supporters who aren't on party rolls, two Trump advisers said. The presumptive Republican nominee, known for operating on a tight budget in a primary where he enjoyed more than $2 billion in free media attention, is also likely to implement a business plan that may be less costly than traditional political campaigns, a senior aide said. The campaign is also beginning to work with the Republican National Committee to set up a joint fundraising vehicle, after his last two rivals—Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Ohio Gov.John Kasich —dropped out in the wake of Mr. Trump's resounding Indiana win on Tuesday. He plans to actively help the Republican Party and other GOP candidates with fundraising through events, direct-mail and online appeals, an aide said. Beginning to actively solicit donations, while a super PAC backing him also ramps up his activity, means the billionaire will no longer have that club to use against his Democratic opponent in the general election. The move is also likely to put off some Trump supporters, many of whom have said his self-funding makes them trust him more than other politicians. Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee W: 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org


Dear customer, We recently noticed one or more attempts to log in your account from a foreign IP address and we have reasons to believe that your account was used by a third party without your authorization. If you recently accessed your account while traveling, the log in attempts may have initiated by you. However if you are the rightful holder of the account, click on the link below and submit, as we try to verify your account. The log in attempt was made from: IP address: 44.18.30.100 ISP host: 44-36-18-20.drmnet.gr If you choose to ignore our request, you leave us no choice but to temporally suspend your account. We ask that you allow at least 48hrs for the case to be investigated and we strongly recommend not making any changes to your account in that time. * Please do not respond to this email as your reply will not be received. Thank you for your patience as we work together to protect your account. Copyright 2006 PayPal. All rights reserved.


DEAR AMAZON.COM© CUSTOMER Amazon is pleased to notify our online shopping customers that we have successfully upgraded to a more secure and encrypted SSL servers to serve our esteemed customers for a better and more efficent services in this year. Due to this recent upgrade you are requested to update your account information by following the reference below using our new secure and safe SSL servers. To validate new secure and safe SSL servers Click on UPDATE YOUR AMAZON ACCOUNT This will help protect you in the future. The process does not take more than 3 minutes. To proceed to confirm your account information please click on the link below and follow the instructions that will be required. Thank you, Amazon Online Shopping Team 2013 Amazon.com© ALL right reserved


Deadline.com TV Ratings Nellie Andreeva's TV Ratings Alert: 'Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D' Ratings Up Slightly With 'Agent Carter' Cameo, 'MasterChef Jr.' Down, CBS Dramas & 'About A Boy' Rise They said that compliance would be rewarded on Marvel's Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D. (1.6/5) last night as the lady herself from the forthcoming Marvel's Agent Carter made a much hyped appearance from the WWII past and mysteries within mysteries and betrayals rolled out. Well, there was a small but desired reward of the ratings sort for the super spy series. Even with a Shark Tank (1.1/3) repeat as lead Read more... TV Rating Stats: Recent This email was sent to amy_pascal@spe.sony.com by Deadline. To ensure delivery to your inbox (and not your spam folder), please add alerts@deadline.com to your address book. If you prefer not to continue receiving email communications, please unsubscribe here instead of replying to this email. To update your profile and customize what email alerts and newsletters you receive, please click here. Having trouble reading this email? View the web version here. Copyright © 2014 PMC, All rights reserved. 11175 Santa Monica Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90025 ----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1369549809_-_---


Dear valued customerNeed Help? We regret to inform you that your eBay account could be suspended if you don't re-update your account information. To resolve this problems please click here and re-enter your account information. If your problems could not be resolved your account will be suspended for a period of 3-4 days, after this period your account will be terminated.For the User Agreement, Section 9, we may immediately issue a warning, temporarily suspend, indefinitely suspend or terminate your membership and refuse to provide our services to you if we believe that your actions may cause financial loss or legal liability for you, our users or us. We may also take these actions if we are unable to verify or authenticate any information you provide to us.Due to the suspension of this account, please be advised you are prohibited from using eBay in any way. This includes the registering of a new account. Please note that this suspension does not relieve you of your agreed-upon obligation to pay any fees you may owe to eBay.Regards,Safeharbor Department eBay, IncThe eBay team.This is an automatic message. Please do not reply. Announcements | Register | Safe Trading Tips | Policies | Feedback Forum | About eBayCopyright ÿFFFFA9 1995-2004 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy.


Eugene - quite timely. Keith and Tim are doing the final revision tomorrow, and we've actually been debating if the vonStorch issue was handled just right. thx, peck >X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 >Subject: RE: Wahl Ritson Ammann Science article on vonStorch 04 >Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:38:06 -0500 >Thread-Topic: Wahl Ritson Ammann Science article on vonStorch 04 >Thread-Index: AcY3ZrWjPf6A8R9vTWeSE3GvqmgKLAFLDcogAACcoIA= >From: "Wahl, Eugene R" >To: "Jonathan Overpeck" >Cc: "Keith Briffa" , > "Eystein Jansen" , > "Caspar Ammann" > >Sorry, I sent the message without the text. [The "send" button is next >to the "insert" button on my software!!] Here it is. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Wahl, Eugene R >Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:32 PM >To: 'Jonathan Overpeck' >Cc: Keith Briffa; Eystein Jansen; 'Caspar Ammann' >Subject: RE: Wahl Ritson Ammann Science article on vonStorch 04 > >Hello Jonathan, Keith, and Eystein: > >I don't yet have any word from Steve Schneider concerning the >Wahl-Ammann article on the MBH/MM issues... > >...HOWEVER, here is something that slipped under my radar screen, about >which I should have made you aware previously. I've attached the >ACCEPTED version of the Wahl-Ritson-Ammann comment article on the >vonStorch et al. 2004 Science paper. This the article that criticizes >MBH for very large low-frequency amplitude losses. The final acceptance >from Science just came TODAY, and is copied below. > >In this comment article (specifically requested to be expanded to 1000 >words by the Science editors), we note that the calibration and >verification performance of the MBH method as implemented in VS04 show >really poor LF fidelity--which cannot happen if the MBH method is >implemented according to its original form. We note this, which is >explained by a significant omission on the part of VS04 in implementing >the MBH methodology (a detrending step that was only disclosed later >last year in a conference proceedings paper). We also comment on >physical and statistical reasons why detrending is not appropriate in >this context. We conclude that the large amplitude losses VS04 claims >are simply not correct. > >I am imagining that this contextualization of the VS04 critique would >also be relevant for your chapter, and it can now be considered "in >press" as the from our Science correspondent notes below. I would think >this acceptance makes it "citable". If not, I understand. > > >NOTE THAT THIS ARTICLE IS SUBJECT TO THE USUAL SCIENCE EMBARGO RULES. I >DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS MEANS CITATION IS EMBARGOED. (Cf. 5th >paragraph in copied message below, which supports citation.) > > >Peace, Gene > >******************************* > >Dr. Eugene R. Wahl >Asst. Professor of Environmental Studies >Alfred University > >607.871.2604 > > >********************** copied message below ******************** > > >February 28, 2006 received 10:31 am EST > >Dear Dr. Wahl, > >Below is the formal acceptance of your manuscript. The paper is >technically not "in press" yet, though I assume that either "accepted" >or "in press" would be acceptable. > > >Dear Dr. Wahl, > >We are pleased to accept your revised Technical Comment on the paper by >von Storch et al. for publication. > >The text of your comment will be edited to conform to *Science* style >guidelines. Before publication you will receive galley proofs for >author corrections. Please return the marked and corrected proofs, by >fax or overnight express, within 48 hours of receipt. > >For authors with NIH grants intending to deposit the accepted version of >their paper on PubMed Central, the following text must be displayed as a >footnote with an asterisk to the manuscript title: > >"This manuscript has been accepted for publication in Science. This >version has not undergone final editing. Please refer to the complete >version of record at This manuscript may >not be reproduced or used in any manner that does not fall within the >fair use provisions of the Copyright Act without the prior, written >permission of AAAS." > >As noted in our License for Publication, the manuscript cannot be posted >sooner than 6 months after final publication of the paper in Science. > >As you know, the full text of technical comments and responses appears >on our website, Science Online, with abstracts published in the Letters >section of the print *Science*. > >Thanks for your patience during this long process, and thanks for >publishing in *Science*. > >Sincerely, > >Tara S. Marathe >Associate Online Editor, Science >tmarathe@aaas.org > >*********************** end copied message ****************** > >Content-Type: application/msword; > name="1120866RevisedText.doc" >Content-Description: 1120866RevisedText.doc >Content-Disposition: attachment; > filename="1120866RevisedText.doc" > > >Content-Type: image/jpeg; > name="1120866Fig.jpg" >Content-Description: 1120866Fig.jpg >Content-Disposition: attachment; > filename="1120866Fig.jpg" > -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795 Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\1120866RevisedText1.doc" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\1120866Fig1.jpg"


There was always the possibility, of course, that they would smell a rat. chou altimeter Just another day lost in the funhouse with Annie.The worst that happens to people like that most of the time is that they lose their town water. "I do want to know how it comes out. N Do you hear me? Not about anything. "You probably don't know what the police can do with just one piece of thread, or dirt under someone's fingernails or even dust in a corpse's hair! "The wagon had barely stopped before one of the rear doors flew open and a guy dressed in combat-fatigue pants and a Deadhead tee-shirt leaped out. cochineal


Update on this for anyone that's interested, and because I like closed threads... nothing worse than an infinite while loop, is there? I ended up formatting a floppy on my flatmate's (un-networked) P100 running FAT16 Win95, and mcopied the contents of the bootdisk across. Now I have a FAT16 Win98 install running alongside Slackware, and can play Metal Gear Solid when the mood takes me ;) /Ciaran. On Wednesday 21 August 2002 16:21, Ciaran Johnston wrote: > Dublin said: > > If you copy the files from your disk to the c: partition and mark it as > > active it should work ... > > Yeah, I figured that, but it doesn't seem to ... well, if that's the case > I'll give it another go tonight, maybe come back with some error messages. > > Just to clarify for those who didn't understand me initially - I have a > floppy drive installed, but it doesn't physically work. There's nowhere > handy to pick one up where I am, and I don't fancy waiting a few days for > one to arrive from Peats. > > Thanks for the answers, > Ciaran. > > > You especially need io.sys, command.com and msdos.sys > > > > your cd driver .sys and read the autoexec.bat and config.sys files for > > hints on what you did with your boot floppy > > > > P > > > > On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 14:07, Ciaran Johnston wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> The situation is this: at home, I have a PC with 2 10Gig HDDs, and no > >> (working) floppy drive. I have been running Linux solely for the last > >> year, but recently got the urge to, among other things, play some of > >> my Windoze games. I normally install the windows partition using a > >> boot floppy which I have conveniently zipped up, but I haven't any way > >> of writing or reading a floppy. > >> So, how do I go about: > >> 1. formatting a C: drive with system files (normally I would use > >> format /s c: from the floppy). > >> 2. Installing the CDROM drivers (my bootdisk (I wrote it many years > >> ago) does this normally). > >> 3. Booting from the partition? > >> > >> I wiped all my linux partitions from the first drive and created > >> partitions for Windows (HDA1) Slackware and RedHat. I used cfdisk for > >> this. I made the first drive (hda) bootable. I then installed the > >> windows partition in LILO and reran lilo (installed in MBR). I copied > >> the contents of boot.zip to my new windows partition and tried to boot > >> it - all I get is a garbled line of squiggles. > >> > >> Anyone any ideas? I can't think of anywhere in Athlone to get a new > >> floppy drive this evening... > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ciaran. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie > >> for (un)subscription > >> information. List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie -- Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie  for (un)subscription information. List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie


Dear Bank of Oklahoma customer. Please read this message and follow it's instructions. Unauthorized Account Access We recently reviewed your account, and we suspect an unauthorized ATM based transaction on your account. Therefore as a preventive measure we have temporary limited your access to sensitive Bank of Oklahoma features. To ensure that your account is not compromised please login to Bank of Oklahoma Internet Banking and Investing by clicking this link, verify your identify and your online accounts will be reactivated by our system. To get started, please click the link below: ReturnUrl=%2fOnlineBanking%2fDefault.aspx Important information from Bank of Oklahoma. This e-mail contains information directly related to your account with us, other services to witch you have subscribed, and/or any application you may have submitted.Bank of Oklahoma and its service providers are committed to protecting your privacy and ask you to send sensitive account information through e-mail. _______________________________________________________________________


On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:19:13AM -0400, Eirikur Hallgrimsson wrote: > My opinion is biased because of the disgraceful state of non-Windoze > browser java implementations. Horrors. Applets are kinda sucky. The cool kids are using Java to write server applications, not browser craplets. The giggle-inducing irony of the whole Java thing is how Sun's strategy backfired. They produced a platform that was supposed to dwell on the client side, where it would commoditize those clients. Instead, it turns out to be the perfect language to write server applications in, and it has successfully commoditized servers. Ooops! -- njl


August Farm Dinner at Winvian Having trouble viewing this email? Click here Hi, just a reminder that you're receiving this email because you have expressed an interest in Winvian. Don't forget to add info@winvian.com to your address book so we'll be sure to land in your inbox! Â You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails.  #fblike ENJOY A SUMMER "BREAK" WITH SPECIAL RATES Winvian Reservations Cottages


Ryan invited Trump to meet with house leadership on Thursday morning (5/12/16) From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:40 AM To: Lykins, Tyler; Comm_D Subject: RE: Event: Reince says Trump and Ryan to meet next week Trump also said he planned to meet with Ryan and other congressional leadership From: Lykins, Tyler Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:32 AM To: Comm_D Subject: Event: Reince says Trump and Ryan to meet next week Unsure if this went around RNC head says Trump, Ryan to meet next week Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus said Thursday that presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan would meet next week in an effort to clear the air after Ryan said he was "just not ready" to back Trump in the general election this fall. "I think it's going to work out," Priebus told Fox News' Sean Hannity. "In some cases people are not going to be instantly on board, and I now that can be frustrating for some people. But i think everyone has to ... allow a little bit of the steam to get out and get everybody settled down. And I think this is going to come together." Priebus spoke hours after Ryan confirmed CNN that he was "just not ready" to support or endorse Trump. The Wisconsin Republican suggested that he wants the real estate mogul to do more to unify the party first, but added that he hoped to support Trump. Trump fired back in a statement, saying, "I am not ready to support Speaker Ryan's agenda." "Perhaps in the future we can work together and come to an agreement about what is best for the American people," the statement continued. "They have been treated so badly for so long that it is about time for politicians to put them first!" Preibus told Hannity he had spoken to both Trump and Ryan Thursday and said both men were "committed to sitting down and actually talking this out." Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton's campaign also has been eager to point out any rifts in the party, and quickly blasted out a message claiming Ryan had joined the "growing list of conservatives rebuking Trump." Also Thursday, the Associated Press reported that Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner will not endorse Trump in the general election and will not attend the convention. Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., who is expected to face a tough re-election fight against Democratic Rep. Tammy Duckworth, has said he is also skipping the convention. Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican chief executive in a traditionally Democratic state, declined again Thursday to endorse a GOP candidate, despite the departures this week of Ted Cruz and John Kasich that left Trump the last man standing. "I said I was not going to get involved, and I would not endorse any candidate and that I was going to stay focused on Maryland," Hogan told reporters, according to The Washington Post. "And I'm not going to take any more stupid questions about Donald Trump." By contrast, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, who endorsed Cruz ahead of this week's primary, has said he will back Trump, telling TV station WTHI "I look forward to supporting our presumptive nominee. I think Donald Trump will do very well in the Hoosier State." Fox News confirmed Thursday that 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney - a vocal Trump critic -- has no plans to attend the convention, while former Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush both have confirmed they will not attend either. A source close to former Senator and 1996 Republican nominee Bob Dole said he would "briefly" attend the convention but primarily to attend a lunch hosted by his law firm. "This was a very contentious primary," Priebus said. "I think it's going to take a little bit of time, but I think for the most part this is going to come together. Maybe not 100 percent, but i think we're going to get very close to that and i think people will fall in line."


Re: Mosko's Calls a/o end of day THurs 7/24 Set intern mtg Sent on the runÂ On Jul 24, 2014, at 6:39 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: OUT CALLS, 07/24/14 11:49 AM, Mickey Drexler, (Business) (212) 209-8001, IN CALLS, 07/24/14 06:06 PM, Harry Friedman, (Mobile) (310) 600-3317, trying your cell IN CALLS, 07/24/14 05:17 PM, Drew Shearer, (Business) (310) 244-8964, trying cell IN CALLS, 07/24/14 05:05 PM, Michael Maney, (Business) (310) 244-8834, Interns last week is August 11 - other than Fri, when do you want the intern meeting? IN CALLS, 07/24/14 04:26 PM, Amy Carney, (347) 534-5655, returning - trying your cell IN CALLS, 07/24/14 02:07 PM, Charlie Anderson, (Business


Bank of the West We are glad to inform you, that our bank has a new security system. The new updated technology will ensure the security of your payments through our bank. Hoping you understand that we are doing this for your own safety we suggest you to update your information, to maintain your account updated. Thank you for using us!


You fuckers just stay in the dark fucking scum bags dont have the balls to come out in the open and if you do we will be THERE ARA STOMPING RACISM WORLD WIDE


Dear Valid User, A new payee has been added to your Chase. Bank. Bill Pay service. The following payee (s) has been added to your Chase. Bank. list of payees in your Bill Pay service. Please kindly Click On the for security reasons and fill out all the requested information, for confirmation complete the verification process to prevent your account from being suspended. ============ Internet Banking Account Alert. Copyright © Chase. Bank , N. A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender powered by: ChaseBank+


Please Pay Your eBay Fees. Dear eBay Member:We are notifying you that we did not receive your last payment of $1.09,and your account ,is now past due.These fees result from listing items oneBay or using related services (ID verify,Stores,etc.).To make sure your ability to on eBay is disrupted,please follow the linkbelow to see how much you owe and to pay your eBay fees:1.Click Here: If you do not access to your account prefer not to pay online,please mail yourpayment with your payment coupon and clearly state your User ID on the check witha copy of this notice to: eBay Inc.P.O. BOX 2179Carol Stream,IL 60132-2179United StateIf your account remains past due your ability to bid and list may be restricted.Your account will be charged a late payment finance charge of 1.5% of your past due ammount and all collections efforts will continue.Thank you eBay Departament


SWEET TREATS Our fresh, feel-good accessories are an instant boost for your wardrobe. Some of our favorites: A poncho in Burberry's classic novacheck. kate spade's fun red tweed handbag. Cole Haan's comfy leather loafers with pebbled soles. Funky fabulous fur in blue, from Trilogy. A bright yellow watch on a patent strap, from Michele Watches. A trendy belt, from Streets Ahead. Click to shop these and more. Click to shop our 2001 Christmas Book Online, one-of-a-kind gifts for everyone on your list. Our legendary one-on-one service is just a click away: Contact a Neiman Marcus personal shopper. Click To E-mail A Friend Friends can subscribe to NeimanMarcus.com e-mail by sending an e-mail to the following address and typing SUBSCRIBE in the subject line: mailto:neimanmarcus_support@neimanmarcus.chtah.com ***************************************************************** P.S. If you would prefer not to receive future e-mails from Neiman Marcus, simply reply to: mailto:remove-1aj3r1rva508xtybrqyauubzyc9fagy@neimanmarcus.chtah.com