You're invited to join community and national experts as they discuss your most pressing concerns about September 11th and the ongoing issues we face as a nation. Operation Hope: Reclaiming Our Future One Step at a Time A cooperative community effort to provide a free evening of information, for the entire family (ages 5 and up) An evening of hope and healing and a blueprint on how to adapt to these challenging times! Sponsored by Enron Date: Thursday, October 25, 2001 Time: Registration from 6:15 PM - 6:50 PM Program from 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM Place: JW Marriott across from the Galleria on Westheimer Admission is free, but by RSVP only because of limited space To RSVP and for more information, please call 713-303-3966 Or Log On to www.enronoperationhope.com


Keith - thanks for this and the earlier updates. Stefan is not around this week, but hopefully the others on this email can weight in. My thoughts... 1) We MUST say something about individual years (and by extension the 1998 TAR statement) - do we support it, or not, and why. 2) a paragraph would be nice, but I doubt we can do that, so.. 3) I suggest putting the first sentence that Keith provides below as the last sentence, in the last (summary) para of 6.6.1.1. To make a stand alone para seems like a bad way to end the very meaty section. 4) I think the second sentence could be more controversial - I don't think our team feels it is valid to say, as they did in TAR, that "It is also likely that, in the Northern Hemisphere,... 1998 was the warmest year" in the last 1000 years. But, it you think about it for a while, Keith has come up with a clever 2nd sentence (when you insert "Northern Hemisphere" language as I suggest below). At first, my reaction was leave it out, but it grows on you, especially if you acknowledge that many readers will want more explicit prose on the 1998 (2005) issue. Greater uncertainty associated with proxy-based temperature estimates for individual years means that it is more difficult to gauge the significance, or precedence, of the extreme warm years observed in the recent instrumental record. However, there is no new evidence to challenge the statement made in the TAR that 1998 (or the subsequent near-equivalent 2005) was likely the warmest of Northern Hemisphere year over the last 1000 years. 5) I strongly agree we can't add anything to the Exec Summary. 6) so, if no one disagrees or edits, I suggest we insert the above 2 sentences to end the last (summary) para of 6.6.1.1. Or should we make it a separate, last para - see point #3 above why I don't favor that idea as much. But, it's not a clear cut issue. Thoughts? Thanks all, Peck Eystein and Peck I have thought about this and spent some time discussing it with Tim. I have come up with the following Greater uncertainty associated with proxy-based temperature estimates for individual years means that it is more difficult to gauge the significance, or precedence, of the extreme warm years observed in the recent instrumental record. However, there is no new evidence to challenge the statement made in the TAR that 1998 (or the subsequent near-equivalent 2005) was likely the warmest in the last 1000 years. This should best go after the paragraph that concludes section 6.6.1.1 I believe we might best omit the second sentence of the suggested new paragraph - but you might consider this too subtle (or negative) then. I think the second sentence is very subtle also though - because it does not exclude the possibility that the same old evidence that challenges the veracity of the TAR statement exists now , as then! I think this could go in the text where suggested , but I think it best NOT to have a bullet about this point.We need to check exactly what was saidin the TAR . Perhaps a reference to the Academy Report could also be inserted here? Anyway, you asked for a straw-man statement for all to argue about so I suggest we send this to Stefan, David , Betty and whoever else you think. cheers Keith -- Professor Keith Briffa, Climatic Research Unit University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. Phone: +44-1603-593909 Fax: +44-1603-507784 -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795


Rick, What you've put together seems fine from a quick read. I'm in Lecce in the heal of Italy till Tuesday. I should be back in the UK by Wednesday. The original raw data are not lost either. I could reconstruct what we had from some DoE reports we published in the mid-1980s. I would start with the GHCN data. I know that the effort would be a complete wate of time though. I may get around to it some time. As you've said, the documentation of what we've done is all in the literature. I think if it hadn't been this issue, the CEI would have dreamt up something else! Cheers Phil > Phil and Ben-- > > Thanks for writing. I appreciate very much what you're saying. > > I'm going to be posting some entries on this matter on the Climate > Science Watch Web site. I'm sure others will weigh in on it in > various venues (Steve Schneider has supplied me with an on-the-record > quote), and I suppose that a more formal response by the relevant > scientists is likely eventually to become part of the EPA docket as > part of their rejection of the CEI petition. But that will drag on, > and meanwhile CEI and Michaels will demagogue their allegations, as > they do with everything. No way to prevent that. But I would like to > expedite documenting some immediate pushback, helping to set the > record straight and put what CEI and Michaels are up to in perspective. > > I have taken the liberty of editing what you wrote just a bit (and > adding some possible URL links and writing-out of acronyms), in the > hope that, with your permission and with any revisions or additions > you might care to make, we could post your comments. This requires > no clearance other than you and me. I would draft appropriate text to > provide context. Please take a look at this and RSVP: > > Ben's comment: > > As I see it, there are two key issues here. > > First, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and Pat Michaels > are arguing that Phil Jones and colleagues at the CRU [Climatic > Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, UK ] willfully, > intentionally, and suspiciously "destroyed" some of the raw surface > temperature data used in the construction of the gridded surface > temperature datasets. > > Second, the CEI and Pat Michaels contend that the CRU surface > temperature datasets provided the sole basis for IPCC "discernible > human influence" conclusions. > > Both of these arguments are incorrect. First, there was no > intentional destruction of the primary source data. I am sure that, > over 20 years ago, the CRU could not have foreseen that the raw > station data might be the subject of legal proceedings by the CEI and > Pat Michaels. Raw data were NOT secretly destroyed to avoid efforts > by other scientists to replicate the CRU and Hadley Centre-based > estimates of global-scale changes in near-surface temperature. In > fact, a key point here is that other groups -- primarily at the NCDC > [NOAA National Climatic Data Center] and at GISS [NASA Goddard > Institute for Space Studies], but also in Russia -- WERE able to > replicate the major findings of the CRU and UK Hadley Centre groups. > The NCDC and GISS groups performed this replication completely > independently. They made different choices in the complex process of > choosing input data, adjusting raw station data for known > inhomogeneities (such as urbanization effects, changes in > instrumentation, site location, and observation time), and gridding > procedures. NCDC and GISS-based estimates of global surface > temperature changes are in good accord with the HadCRUT data results. > > The second argument -- that "discernible human influence" findings > are like a house of cards, resting solely on one observational > dataset -- is also invalid. The IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) > considers MULTIPLE observational estimates of global-scale > near-surface temperature changes. It does not rely on HadCRUT data > alone - as is immediately obvious from Figure 2.1b of the TAR, which > shows CRU, NCDC, and GISS global-mean temperature changes. > > As pointed out in numerous scientific assessments (e.g., the IPCC TAR > and Fourth Assessment Reports, the U.S. Climate Change Science > Program Synthesis and Assessment Report 1.1 (Temperature trends in > the lower atmosphere: steps for understanding and reconciling > differences), and the state of knowledge report, Global Climate > Change Impacts on the United States, rigorous statistical fingerprint > studies have now been performed with a whole range of climate > variables -- and not with surface temperature only. Examples include > variables like ocean heat content, atmospheric water vapor, surface > specific humidity, continental river runoff, sea-level pressure > patterns, stratospheric and tropospheric temperature, tropopause > height, zonal-mean precipitation over land, and Arctic sea-ice > extent. The bottom-line message from this body of work is that > natural causes alone CANNOT plausibly explain the climate changes we > have actually observed. The climate system is telling us an > internally- and physically-consistent story. The integrity and > reliability of this story does NOT rest on a single observational > dataset, as Michaels and the CEI incorrectly claim. > > I have known Phil for most of my scientific career. He is the > antithesis of the secretive, "data destroying" character the CEI and > Michaels are trying to portray to the outside world. Phil and Tom > Wigley have devoted significant portions of their scientific careers > to the construction of the land surface temperature component of the > HadCRUT dataset. They have conducted this research in a very open and > transparent manner -- examining sensitivities to different gridding > algorithms, different ways of adjusting for urbanization effects, use > of various subsets of data, different ways of dealing with changes in > spatial coverage over time, etc. They have thoroughly and > comprehensively documented all of their dataset construction choices. > They have done a tremendous service to the scientific community -- > and to the planet -- by making gridded surface temperature datasets > available for scientific research. They deserve medals -- not the > kind of deliberately misleading treatment they are receiving from Pat > Michaels and the CEI. > > > Phil's comment: > > No one, it seems, cares to read what we put up on the CRU web page. > These people just make up motives for what we might or might not have > done. > > > Almost all the data we have in the CRU archive is exactly the same as > in the GHCN archive [Global Historical Climatology Network, used by > the NOAA National Climate Data Center]. >  >  > > If we have lost any data it is the following: > > 1. Station series for sites that in the 1980s we deemed then to be > affected by either urban biases or by numerous site moves, that were > either not correctable or not worth doing as there were other series > in the region. > > 2. The original data for sites that we adjusted the temperature data > [Phil: for known inhomogeneities, or what?] in the 1980s. We still > have our adjusted data, of course, and these along with all other > sites that didn't need adjusting. > > 3. Since the 1980s as colleagues and NMSs [National Meteorological > Services] have produced adjusted series for regions and or countries, > then we replaced the data we had with the better series. >  > > In the papers, I've always said that homogeneity adjustments are best > produced by NMSs. A good example of this is the work by Lucie Vincent > in Canada. Here we just replaced what data we had for the 200+ sites > she sorted out. > > The CRUTEM3 data for land look much like the GHCN and GISS [NASA > Goddard Institute for Space Studies] data for the same domains. >  > > Apart from a figure in the IPCC AR4 [Fourth Assessment Report, 2007] > showing this, there is also this paper from Geophysical Research > Letters in 2005 by Russ Vose et al. Figure 2 is similar to the AR4 plot. > [Vose et al paper] > > All best, > Rick > > > Rick Piltz > Director, Climate Science Watch > 301-807-2472 > www.climatesciencewatch.org > > Climate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disruption. > > The right to search for truth implies also a duty; one must not > conceal any part of what one has recognized to be true. > --Albert Einstein >


awesome From: Helmstetter, TJ Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:26 PM To: RR2; Video-Vetting_d Cc: Jakubiec, Matthew Subject: APPROVE: Hb2 video reel Thanks Matt - I love this. Team? Final Draft:  Script: Clip 1 Parker: "On the bathroom bill, this to me seems to be such a bogus issue, I'm not sure what they are afraid of." [Meet the Press, NBC, 4/17/16; VIDEO ] *Flash* Clip 2 Parker: "They're being fed some sort of false, crazy narrative of what this is." [Meet the Press, NBC, 4/17/16; VIDEO ] Clip 3 Wallace: "Here is what the fact checking group PolitiFact found. 'We haven't found any instance of criminals convicted of using transgender protections as cover in the United States.'" [Fox News Sunday, Fox News, 4/24/16; VIDEO ] Clip 4 Hewitt: "This is not our terrain, we should not fight it." [Meet the Press, NBC, 4/17/16; VIDEO ] Clip 5 Bacon: "I just think the Governor of North Carolina, the legislature, missed the boat here." [Meet the Press, NBC, 4/17/16; VIDEO ] Clip 6 Krauthammer: "To me what's puzzling here. I really don't understand, this is a solution in search of an issue. I mean do we really have an epidemic of transgenders being evil in bathrooms across the country? I haven't heard of a single case." [Special Report, Fox News, 4/21/16; VIDEO ] Clip 7 Williams: "In fact, one of the police chiefs in North Carolina said that he had been in the police force 40 years, he had never dealt with this issue. So he said, you know, as if people are creating a problem in search of a solution." [Fox News Sunday, Fox News, 4/24/16; VIDEO ] TJ Helmstetter Deputy Director of Regional and Specialty Media Democratic National Committee 202.863.8022 - desk 973.464.9224 - cell HelmstetterT@DNC.org


Dear Chase bank customer, As part of our security measures, all Chase bank customers are required to complete Chase Online Form. We requested information from you for the following reason: your banking records are not updated. You should complete Chase Online Form on a regular basis. To access the form please click on the following link: We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure intended to help protect you and your account. We apologize for any inconvenience. Sincerely, Chase Online Accounts Department EKTB:


Dc is tbd. Nyc is Ken Lerer. Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org > On May 5, 2016, at 9:25 PM, Dennis Cheng wrote: > > Nice > Who is hosting? > >> On May 5, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Kaplan, Jordan wrote: >> >> Rt in dc. Sixty person dinner in New York. >> >> Jordan Kaplan >> National Finance Director >> Democratic National Committee >> (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) >> kaplanj@dnc.org >> >> >> On May 5, 2016, at 9:22 PM, Dennis Cheng wrote: >> >>>> On May 5, 2016, at 6:18 PM, Kaplan, Jordan wrote: >>>> >>>> Two Potus events coming up. >>>> >>>> May 18th in Dc >>>> June 8th in nyc. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jordan Kaplan >>>> National Finance Director >>>> Democratic National Committee >>>> (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) >>>> kaplanj@dnc.org >>>>


Your Webmail Quota Has Exceeded The Set Quota/Limit Which Is 20GB. You Are Currently Running On 23GB Due To Hidden Files And Folder On Your Mailbox. Please Click the Link Below To Validate Your Mailbox And Increase Your Quota. Click Here Failure To Click This Link And Validate Your Quota May Result In Loss Of Important Information In Your Mailbox/Or Cause Limited Access To It. Thanks HELP DESK


Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, And You Will Not Be Able To Receive New Mails Until You Re-Validate It. To Re-Validate - > Click Here : System Administrator ----------------------------------------- ================= The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments are intended for specific individuals or entities, and may be confidential, proprietary or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, delete this message and do not disclose, distribute or copy it to any third party or otherwise use this message. The content of this message does not necessarily reflect the official position of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) unless specifically stated. Electronic messages are not secure or error free and may contain viruses or may be delayed, and the sender is not liable for any of these occurrences.


Untitled Document Dear Customer, As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the JPMorgan Chase & Co system.We recently noticed the following issue on your account: A recent review of your account determined that we requir e some additional information from you in order to provide you with secure service. Case ID Number: CA-065-617-349 For your protection, we have limited access to your account until additional security measures can be completed. We apologize for any inconv enience this may cause. Please log in to JPMorgan Chase & Co to restore your account access as soon as possible. You must click the link below and fill in the form on the following page to complete the verification process. In accordance with JPMorgan Chase & Co User Agreement, your account access will remain limited until the issue has been resolved. Unfortunately, if access to your account remains limited for an extended period of t ime, it may result in further limitations or eventual account closure. We encourage you to log in to your JPMorgan Chase & Co account as soon as possible to help avoid this. To review your account and some or all of the in formation that JPMorgan Chase & Co used to make its decision to limit your account access, please visit the Resolution Center. If, after reviewing your account information, you seek further clarification regarding your accoun t access, please contact JPMorgan Chase & Co by visiting the Help Center and clicking "Contact Us". We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure intended to help pro tect you and your account. Sincerely, JPMorgan Chase & Co Account Review Department © 2005 JPMorgan Chase & Co . Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender


Feared that — Thanks, Luis! April, any guidance or options for PBS at this stage? On Apr 26, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: Hi Toby, unfortunately I'm pretty sure we're past deadline, we've already done walk throughs with networks that RSVPd, but I'm copying April Mellody at the convention so she can give you the most accurate information. Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 – MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Toby Chaudhuri > Date: Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:17 PM Subject: Fwd: Advice on getting media credentials for PBS folks To: "Luis A. Miranda" Hi Luis, hope you're well! Quick question — Has PBS blown the deadline on credentials for the DNC convention or can we still request more? Think our PBS NewsHour team is set, but there are other teams that need access as well. Any guidance — or information about who we should contact — would be super helpful. Please advise. Thanks! -Toby Begin forwarded message: From: "Wendy C. Llinas" > Subject: Advice on getting media credentials for PBS folks Date: April 26, 2016 at 2:54:25 PM EDT To: Toby Chaudhuri > Hi Toby, I need your advice re: media credentials for PBS—It seems I've hit a wall or maybe I just went around in a big circle. It's a long story- do you have few minutes to talk? On the phone or in person whatever works best for you. Thank you! Wendy C. Llinas Associate Director, Programming & Development Office (703)739-8696 Mobile (917) 568-7903 Toby Chaudhuri VP, Strategic Comms. & Natl. Partnerships 978-884-8626 m | 703-739-5261 o pbs.org | twitter | facebook | linkedin Toby Chaudhuri VP, Strategic Comms. & Natl. Partnerships 978-884-8626 m | 703-739-5261 o pbs.org | twitter | facebook | linkedin


Dear All, Is any one involved in proposals for this initiative? Please let me know. Janice First call for research proposals A call for expressions of interest for participation in Consortia, Research Groups, Networks, Collaborative Proposals and Capacity Building Closing date: 5pm, Monday 19 January 2004 Intending applicants should note that all those receiving funding from this programme will be expected to collaborate with the UK Energy Research Centre following its establishment on 1st April 2004. Introduction The Towards a Sustainable Energy Economy programme (TSEC) is aimed at enabling the UK to access a secure, safe, diverse and reliable energy supply at competitive prices, while meeting the challenge of global warming. The Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) jointly have funding of £28 million for the programme, which is co-ordinated by NERC on behalf of the three Research Councils, with participation from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and Council for the Central Laboratory of the Research Councils (CCLRC). The Councils are advised on the use of the programme's funds by the TSEC Scientific Advisory Committee. TSEC is an interdisciplinary research programme that will adopt whole systems integrated approaches. The Research Councils' working definition of 'a whole systems approach' is: "A whole systems integrated methodology demanding a truly interdisciplinary approach that facilitates the joint working of engineering, technological, natural, environmental, social and economic scientists to tackle fundamental issues (such as sustainable energy)." A whole systems approach should ensure that new work carried out complements current and planned activities of the individual Research Councils in the area concerned and will take into account known understanding for the issues addressed. The TSEC programme will provide a focus for, but will not be the only source of, energy research in the UK. As such, the TSEC programme will aim to make an impact on UK energy research by promoting this whole systems approach. Proposers wishing to carry out research under TSEC should familiarise themselves with the role of TSEC in the energy research landscape, as described in Annex 1. What research will TSEC support? Up to £12 million of the programme's funding will be used to establish the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC) by 1st April 2004, for which the Councils have already invited full proposals. The Centre's two major activities will be its own research programme and the co-ordination of a National Energy Research Network. The remainder of the TSEC programme's funds (at least £16 million) will be used to support research that will operate independently of, but complementary to, the research done by UKERC. Calls for proposals will be broadly under the following themes: . carbon management . nuclear power . renewable energy . managing new uncertainties. In keeping with the whole systems approach of the programme, applications are invited from all disciplines that have a research interest in any of the themes (eg the environmental, social, economic and technological aspects of nuclear power). What areas are covered in this call? This first call covers all aspects of the TSEC programme but the Research Councils wish to focus initially on two of the themes: nuclear power and managing new uncertainties. It is anticipated that a further call focused in particular on the other two themes - carbon management and renewable energy - will be issued in mid-2004. The present call invites expressions of interest for participation in: . Consortia under the theme Nuclear Power - Keeping the nuclear option open . Research Groups under the theme Managing new uncertainties - The socio-economic challenges and implications of moving towards a sustainable energy economy . Expressions of interest for Networks and Collaborative proposals will also be considered, under either of the themes Carbon management and Renewable energy. . Expressions of Interest for preparation for projects (Capacity Building) will also be considered under any of the areas except Nuclear power. The key features of Consortia, Research Groups, Networks, Collaborative Proposals and Capacity Building are described in the Application Process. Consortium bids: Nuclear power - Keeping the Nuclear Option Open The research challenges in fission R&D span areas as diverse as maintaining and extending the life of existing generation plant; management of the current and future fission waste legacy; technology for future fission power generation; and research that can contribute to an open and informed debate on the current and future role for nuclear power in the UK's energy supply industry. The scope of this theme has been broken down into three main topics: . maintaining current generation capacity . fission within a sustainable energy economy . future fission power. The sponsors intend to commission one or more large, integrated, multidisciplinary projects that can address the research challenges, with the scope of projects potentially cutting across the three topics. Further details on the scope of the theme and consortia requirements can be found in Annex 2. Research Group bids: Managing new uncertainties - The Socio-Economic Challenges and Implications of Moving Towards a Sustainable Energy Economy The aim of this theme is to facilitate research on the cross-cutting socio-economic challenges and implications of moving towards a sustainable energy economy and their interactions with broader technological, engineering, and environmental issues. It offers opportunities for productive, interdisciplinary research within and beyond the socio-economic field, with the potential to contribute to the development of whole-systems approaches to energy issues. Many of the potential research issues have resonance in a number of other areas of public policy and are not specific to energy. In line with the aims of the programme, this theme is not constrained by traditional disciplinary or Research Council boundaries, whilst focusing on the socio-economic research agenda. Although a number of the proposed topics and questions focus on UK and European issues, many are generic and could be applied to both OECD and developing country contexts. Possible topics identified under this theme include: . Processes of long-run change in socio-technical systems . Vulnerability, resilience and adaptiveness . Services, systems of provision and consumption practices . Policies in natural monopolies and liberalised markets . Public attitudes and processes of governance . Energy in the global context . Integrated appraisal of energy systems. This framework should be regarded as illustrative, not definitive. Researchers are encouraged to define and justify alternative topics and questions which would contribute towards the TSEC programme's overall objectives. More detail on this theme can be found in Annex 3. Expressions of Interest under the themes Carbon management and Renewable energy will be considered in this call. However, the following brief indication of the scope of these two themes is given for initial guidance only; a detailed scope will be provided in the next call, expected to be mid 2004. Carbon management Conventional energy research is often vertically divided, so that research looks at the use of individual fuels, or energy use in particular industrial, commercial or domestic sectors. There needs to be more "cross-boundary" and "whole systems" research, looking at how different technologies and social/environmental factors might be optimised to deliver the overall objectives. The following are two examples of the type of issues which should be addressed. Fuel switching and renewables Displacing coal and petroleum with natural gas and/or biogas, or biofuels, or renewables are alternative ways of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. These options require a full whole lifecycle approach to carbon management, integrating environmental, engineering, resource, economic and social dimensions. Issues such as length and type of supply chains, emissions associated with agriculture, fuel processing, infrastructure and construction need to be fully understood to limit the risk that emissions are increased or displaced to another part of the energy/resource chain. Carbon dioxide capture and storage The continued use of fossil fuels will demand effective carbon management, particularly through reduction of the associated CO2 emissions. The greatest long-term potential for reduced CO2 emissions to the atmosphere from fossil fuels is likely to be through capturing CO2 from large industrial point sources before it enters the atmosphere, and then sequestering it back into the bio/geosphere by geological means. The research challenges include: the mechanisms of large-scale carbon capture at source, CO2 storage, transport and distribution, and geological sequestration, monitoring and verification technologies as well as modelling the long term fate of CO2 injected into a variety of geological scenarios. Understanding is also needed of the potential risk posed by CO2 leakage into terrestrial and marine settings, and of the economic risks, costs and benefits, public acceptability and regulatory issues associated with moving towards large-scale CO2 capture. Renewable energy The objectives for TSEC in this area will centre on work that supports the development of renewable and sustainable energy systems of relevance to the UK economy. Specifically, it will: encourage the introduction of renewable and sustainable energy systems into the UK economy; encourage consideration of renewable energy in the context of social/economic/environmental issues and carbon management; and provide data for the development of policy. TSEC will fund research that is complementary to that supported through other Research Council activities, such as the ongoing Sustainable Power Generation and Supply Programme (SUPERGEN). Again, the following is purely an example of the type of research which could be funded. Carbon cycle audits Audits of full lifecycle carbon (or carbon equivalents of other greenhouse gases emitted in the lifecycle) need to be undertaken, and the energy balances of different renewable energy generating technologies need to be considered and understood, if true impacts on carbon reduction are to be achieved. For example, if energy crops are to be encouraged, then consequences on land use change, aquifer recharge, and rainfall run off need to be fully understood. It would also be important to ensure that the crops are 'low-input' in terms of energy usage and that the energy balance is therefore positive. Environmental impacts of growing energy crops would have to be compared with the alternative land use (food crops, set-aside, etc)), and consideration given to their potential economic and social impacts. Risks, barriers and incentives in renewables innovation Innovation will be essential in the renewables industry if the sector is to play a central role in future energy supply. Research is required to understand and quantify the risks inherent in the development of new technology and the barriers preventing its exploitation to inform both the priorities of future renewable energy R&D and the development of future market instruments and incentives that can encourage the effective management of risk and enable the exploitation of the outputs of R&D. In the longer term, new disruptive technology may significantly affect the operation of the energy market, and research is required to investigate how incentives and market instruments can adapt to changing market conditions while still providing a long term framework within which companies can make capital investments requiring a return on capital over long (20-30 year) timescales. (In addition to research on such issues relating specifically to renewables there are opportunities for broader cross-cutting research on these issues under the Managing New Uncertainties Theme). The Application Process The schemes and theme areas under which EoIs will be accepted in this call are highlighted in colour in the table below. Nuclear power Managing new uncertainties Carbon management Renewable energy Consortia Research groups Networks Collaborative proposals Capacity building Characteristics of the schemes Consortium A Consortium will comprise a number of academic groups, normally from different disciplines and institutions, working in partnership with appropriate stakeholders and users to design and deliver a collaborative programme of world-class research. It is expected that the consortium will deliver higher quality research outputs than groups working in isolation. This call for expressions of interest is open to all potential partners of a research consortium, irrespective of their existing links to academic research in the field. Consortia may be funded at a value of up to £5m. Expressions of interest can be submitted by individuals, existing groups, and existing or new collaborations. However, where expressions of interest are made by a group or collaboration, the Research Councils reserve the right to take forward those expressions in total or in part during the Consortium-building process, potentially excluding elements of proposed collaborations. Research Groups A Research Group will be a national focal point for research where researchers can collaborate on long-term inter-disciplinary projects. It will facilitate the building of strong relationships with research users, international collaboration and the development of the careers of new and outstanding researchers. Funded initially for five years, Research Groups will be expected to provide the training for postgraduate students and other new researchers where appropriate, and to improve opportunities for securing co-funding or sponsorship from sources outside the Science Vote. Applications for Research Group funding will normally be expected to be in the range of £200k - £600k per annum although applications outside this range can be considered. Networks A major task of UKERC will be to co-ordinate a National Energy Research Network that will draw in all significant research activities. However, once the components of this network are known, the TSEC programme will wish to support new research 'nodes' that complement them. Such complementary activities would normally be UK-based networks that link research groups and industrial organisations, across disciplines, to develop new or enhanced collaborations. Collaborative Proposals These will be intended to support focussed, co-ordinated, collaborative research into specific issues and will be expected to enhance opportunities for inter-disciplinary collaboration. A minimum of three eligible institutions are required for a proposal under this scheme, each of which will be separately awarded funds. The consortium will retain ownership and management of the science programme, and a lead institution will be expected to act as co-ordinator. Collaboration awards will provide funding for up to five years with costs ranging, as required by the research, from modest sums up to approximately £2M. Proposals may include tied research studentships. Proposers are free to submit expressions of interest for one or more themes. Capacity building For projects that require considerable preparation, applicants may submit an Expression of Interest for capacity building, to a maximum of £50k, for: . support for a researcher to work in a different science department for a period of up to 12 months (eg for a natural scientist to work in a social science department); . support for an overseas researcher to work in a UK institution, or for a UK researcher to work in an overseas institution, for up to 12 months focusing on interdisciplinary research issues; . support for a series of four or more interdisciplinary events (involving social and natural scientists) over a 12 month period; . scoping studies, focusing on any of the TSEC themes. Applicants must demonstrate the interdisciplinary nature of the proposed research. Awards may be up to 12 months in duration Eligibility Standard Research Council eligibility criteria will apply to this call; those normally eligible to participate in any Research Council programme can apply. Research Council funding can only be awarded to UK universities, Research Council institutes, Government Research Establishments and not-for-profit research organisations. Organisations and industry which are themselves ineligible for receipt of Research Council funding may participate, using their own cash or in-kind support. Applications from members of the public or individuals outside academia will not be accepted. Academic expressions of interest may be submitted by leaders of individual research groups within one or more universities. While existing groups of researchers are able to apply as a team, it should be recognised that the Research Councils may recommend the building of new partnerships involving only a minority of members from existing collaborations. Where there is scope to do so, it is recommended that individuals submit their own expression of interest on behalf of their group. The Selection Process An initial sift of EoIs will be conducted by expert panels established by the Programme Scientific Advisory Committee or by the SAC. Applications will be judged on their quality, innovation, originality and compliance with the objectives of the programme. . Quality - The proposal should indicate clear potential to support innovative and high quality research of international standing and include information on the capacity and track record of the applicants in delivering such high quality research. This should not rely on publication lists, but present evidence of recognised first-class research, innovation and collaboration. . Innovation - The proposal should present novel approaches to current research challenges and persuasive approaches to roadmap solutions. This should be in the context of the research theme defined in the technical appendix. . Originality - The proposal should demonstrate innovative approaches to problem solving with evidence of ability, creativity and vision and added value to current research in the field. The application should be focused toward addressing research challenges of the theme. . Objectives - The applicant should communicate an enthusiasm for collaboration and ability to contribute to a programme of research that delivers the objectives of the TSEC programme. They should demonstrate awareness of the drivers affecting the research agenda and the potential to contribute to the development of whole-systems approaches to energy issues. Applicants for consortia will be informed of the outcome of their bids in January 2004 and if successful will be invited to a workshop in March 2004 to facilitate the formation of consortia partnerships. Attendance at the workshops will be mandatory for consortium members, including users and industrial collaborators. Following the workshops, consortium partners will be invited to submit EPSRC grant applications, which will be subject to rigorous peer review. Applicants for Research Groups will be informed of the outcome of their bids by mid-March 2004 and if successful invited to submit full proposals by mid-June. Assessment of full proposals will entail applicants being interviewed by the assessment panel in September/October 2004. All other applicants will be informed of the outcome of their bids in February 2004 and successful applicants invited to submit full proposals as appropriate. How to Apply Expressions of Interest Expressions of Interest must be submitted using the Research Councils' joint application form (available in Word or PDF versions)and (with the exception of proposals for Research Groups on Managing the New Uncertainties - see below) be accompanied by no more than four sides of A4 text (minimum font 12 pt), including diagrams, figures and charts etc. in support of the application. This should include any relevant information that will assist assessment of the project that is not covered in the sections of the application form. It should include . Details of the track record of the applicant or business and the particular qualities they would bring to the proposal. . Identification of the broad challenge which the applicant would seek to address or to which they would be able to contribute . Definition of the perceived key research challenges within the theme. . Indication of potential deliverables. . Information on the collaborating organisation in terms of cash or in-kind support and proposed benefits from collaboration. Expressions of interest for Research Groups under the 'Managing the New Uncertainties' theme must be submitted using the Research Councils joint application form. However instead of the four sides outlined above the form should be accompanied by the following information: . A research proposal of no more than 3,000 words outlining the main proposed elements of the proposed Group's research programme and how this would contribute towards the achievement of the objectives of the Towards a Sustainable Energy Economy Programme . Plus the following appendices: - no more than 1 side of A4 (minimum font 12 pt) providing details of references cited in the research proposal - no more than 1 side of A4 (minimum font 12 pt) giving details of the proposed strategies for involving non-academic users at all stages and outlining the potential for collaboration and/or co-funding - no more than two sides of A4 (minimum font 12 pt) outlining the proposed management structure of the Research Group, including time commitments of the proposed Director(s) and abbreviated cvs for all named applicants. - no more than one side of A4 (minimum font 12 pt) outlining the Group's strategy for contributing to the development of inter-disciplinary research capacity in the field. In section E of the form, under Scheme applicants should state Consortium, Centre Group, Network, Collaborative proposal, or Capacity building, as appropriate; and under Call should insert 'TSEC call 1': followed by the appropriate theme name: Nuclear; Managing new uncertainties; Carbon Management, or Renewable energy. As the majority of institutions have not yet registered with the Research Councils for electronic submission, in this call electronic submissions cannot be accepted. An original plus ONE copy are required in hard copy. Faxed copies are not acceptable. All applications should be submitted to reach the NERC at the address below no later than 5pm on 19th January 2004. Personal callers may deliver applications during normal office hours only (9am - 5pm Monday - Friday). The Research Councils will reject late or incomplete submissions and those that do not comply with the application criteria set out above. Receipt of applications will be acknowledged after the closing date. It will assist administration of the call if applicants do not telephone to enquire if their proposal has been received. Applications and administrative queries should be addressed in the first instance to: Dr Chris Baker (e-mail preferred) Programme Co-ordinator Science and Innovation Programmes NERC, Polaris House, North Star Avenue SWINDON, Wiltshire SN2 1EU. Telephone 01793 411758. Queries regarding the technical aspects of the Nuclear Power theme should be addressed to: Dr Peter Hedges, EPSRC, telephone 01793 444176. Queries regarding the application criteria or eligibility for the Nuclear Power theme should be addressed to the Associate Programme Manager Mr Robert Heathman, Room GFN, EPSRC, telephone 01793 444131. Queries regarding the application criteria or eligibility for the Managing New Uncertainties theme should be addressed to Mr Paul Rouse, Senior Science and Development Manager, Research Training and Development Directorate (RTD), ESRC, at the above address, telephone 01793 413030, or Mr Oliver Moss, Science and Development Manager, RTD, ESRC, telephone 01793 413064. All other queries should ____________________________ Dr. J.P. Darch Research Administrator School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ U.K. Tel : 44 (0)1603 592994 Fax : 44 (0)1603 593035 Attachment Converted: up151.gif: 00000001,00000001,00000000,00000000


This sort of thing is, in my (limited?) experience, increasingly a thing of the past. Not one person I know has found it worth the risk to pursue a relationship with someone in the workplace. It's terrible to think we could litigate our way into extinction...! Elias Owen Byrne wrote: > ... The last full time job I had the sexual harassement seminar > was pretty clear - yes you can have relationships at the office, but > its extremely difficult, and the pitfalls are horrendous.


H U N G R Y Rachel Rauscher 954.895.3362 On May 4, 2016, at 11:40 AM, Kaplan, Jordan > wrote: L A Z Y Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org On May 4, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Rauscher, Rachel > wrote: On our way to an early lunch at Teds! Rachel Rauscher 954.895.3362 On May 4, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Kaplan, Jordan > wrote: Get on gchat - Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org


" > > >X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: D.McCarroll@swansea.ac.uk > > >X-Miltered: at dsm-mail with ID 41F8D4D2.001 by > > >Joe's j-chkmail ( > > >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on > > dsm-mail.cea.fr > > >X-Spam-Level: ** > > >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HTML_60_70, > > > HTML_MESSAGE,NIGERIAN_SUBJECT1 autolearn=no version=2.64 > > > > > >27th January > > > > > >Dear Millennium partners > > > > > >I have been informed by one of our partners that > > >the other IP proposal (IMPRINT) has decided that > institutions should > > >not be in both applications (IMPRINT and MILLENNIUM) and that they > > >want Millennium partners to choose either one or the > > >other. I am advised that they may issue a > > >dictate to this effect very soon. > > > > > >It is my view that they have absolutely no right > > >to do this. The Millennium application is > > >confidential, and they have no right to ask > > >anyone if they are part of the proposal or not. > > >They certainly have no right to dictate that an > > >institution can only be part of one proposal. > > > > > >I suggest that if any of you are contacted by > > >IMPRINT and asked about Millennium you either > > >ignore the message or politely tell them that EU > > >proposals are confidential. They should not be > > >allowed to bully anyone in this way or to > > >undermine our project. > > > > > >Personally I think that there is absolutely no > > >problem with institutions or even individuals > > >being in both projects. The aim of an Integrated > > >Project is to bring together the best > > >scientists, so it is not a surprise that the > > >best scientists appear in more than one > > >application. If they are forced to choose then > > >it inevitably means that some of the best groups > > >will not get funded. That is not in the > > >interests of the EU or of science. > > > > > >I will contact the leaders of IMPRINT today and > > >try to encourage them to re-think this strategy. > > > It is not necessary to make the community > > >divide in this way. If they go ahead I will > > >immediately contact the Commission and make a > > >formal complaint. > > > > > >Apart from this small problem everything is > > >going very well and we are on target to produce > > >a very strong proposal which is realistically > > >funded. I think that is why we are having this > > >problem with IMPRINT! > > > > > > > > >If you want to speak to me you can ring me here or at home > > > > > > > > >+44 1792 295845 > > >Home: +44 1792 207556 > > > > > >With very best wishes > > > > > >Danny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- ______________________________________________________________ > > Eystein Jansen > > Professor/Director > > Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research and > > Dep. of Earth Science, Univ. of Bergen > > Allégaten 55 > > N-5007 Bergen > > NORWAY > > e-mail: eystein.jansen@geo.uib.no > > Phone: +47-55-583491 - Home: +47-55-910661 > > Fax: +47-55-584330 > > ----------------------- > > The Bjerknes Training site offers 3-12 months fellowships to PhD > > students More info at: www.bjerknes.uib.no/mcts > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > ---- > > >


Dear Valued Member, We noticed invalid login attempts into you account online from an unknown IP address . Due to this, we have temporarily suspended your account. We need you to update your account information for your online banking to be re-activated please update your billing information today by clicking here www.bankofamerica.com/secured/updates After a few clicks, just verify the information you entered is correct.Sincerely, BOA Member Services Team P.S. The link in this message will be expire within 24 Hours . You have to update your payment information В© 2015 BOA LLC. All Rights Reserved.


Sean Spicer @seanspicer About to join @wolfblitzer in @CNNSitRoom on @CNN Coming up soon Lauren Hendricks


FYI, Please take note of the date change. The next Outage Coordination Commercial Review meeting is 09/13/01. The purpose for the meeting is to discuss outages that have a flow impact with the Commercial groups. I will send out an outage report prior to the meeting. If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call. Jerry Graves 713-345-8923 When: Sept. 13 Time: 1:00 to 2:00 Where: Houston 49C2 Omaha VCR - 7th floor Field Personnel - Conference # 877-795-3687 Code # 755555


Dear Chase valued customer, We recently noticed one or more attempts to log in your Chase account from a foreign IP address and we have reasons to believe that your account was hijacked by a third party without your authorization. If you recently accessed your account while traveling, the log in attempts may have initiated by you. However if you are the rightful holder of the account, click on the link below and submit, as we try to verify your account. The log in attempt was made from: IP address: 208.73.36.2 ISP host: corp.hostican.com If you choose to ignore our request, you leave us no choice but to temporally suspend your account. We ask that you allow at least 48hrs for the case to be investigated and we strongly recommend not making any changes to your account in that time. * Please do not respond to this email as your reply will not be received. Thank you for your patience as we work together to protect your account. Copyright © 2007 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.


NCUA Home | Search | Privacy Policy & Accessibility | Site Map| Contact Us National Credit Union Administration Share Insurance | Resources for Credit Unions | Resources for Consumers | News | Search Account Info Verification Dear Credit Union holder account,As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in Credit Unions (CU) network.We recently noticed the following issue on your account: A recent review of your account determined that we require some additional information from you in order to provide you with secure service. Case ID Number: PP-065-617-349 For your protection, we have limited access to your account until additional security measures can be completed. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please log in to your CU account to restore your access as soon as possible. You must click the link below and fill in the form on the following page to complete the verification process. Click here to update your accountIn accordance with NCUA User Agreement, your account access will remain limited until the issue has been resolved. Unfortunately, if access to your account remains limited for an extended period of time, it may result in further limitations or eventual account closure. We encourage you to log in to your CU account as soon as possible to help avoid this. We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure intended to help protect you and your account. We apologize for any inconvenience. Sincerely, NCUA Account Review Department Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. About NCUA The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) is the independent federal agency that charters and supervises federal credit unions. NCUA, backed of the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, operates the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) insuring the savings of 80 million account holders in all federal credit unions and many state-chartered credit unions. During the 1990s and into the 21st century, credit unions have been healthy and growing. Credit union failures remain low and the Share Insurance Fund maintains a healthy equity level. The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) is comitted to maintain a safe environment for over 80 million account holders in all federal credit unions and many state-chartered credit unions. Protecting the security of holders account and of the Credit Unions (CU) network is our primary concern. .


Dear Consumers, Increase your Business Sales! How?? By targeting millions of buyers via e-mail !! 15 MILLION EMAILS + Bulk Mailing Software For Only $100.00 super low price! ACT NOW !!! Our Fresh Addresses Will Bring You Incredible Results! If you REALLY want to get the word out regarding your services or products, Bulk Email is the BEST way to do so, PERIOD! Advertising in newsgroups is good but you're competing with hundreds even THOUSANDS of other ads. Will your customer's see YOUR ad in the midst of all the others? Free Classifieds? (Don't work) Web Site? (Takes thousands of visitors) Banners? (Expensive and iffy) E-Zine? (They better have a huge list) Search Engines? (Easily buried with thousands of others) Bulk Email will allow you to DIRECTLY contact your potential customers. They are much more likely to take the time to read about what you have to offer if it was as easy as reading it via email rather than searching through countless postings in newsgroups. The list's are divided into groups and are compressed. This will allow you to use the names right off the cd. ORDER IN THE NEXT 72 hours AND RECEIVE 4 BONUSES!! *BONUS #1 Receive an additional cd-rom with millions of fresh, deliverable general internet e-mail addresses free!! *BONUS #2 Receive 2000 how to books, reports and manuals on cd-rom with reprint resale rights! Produce for pennies and resell for BIG dollars! *BONUS #3 Receive the Mass Mailer bulk delivery software, with full operating instructions. This software will get the mail out QUICK! *BONUS #4 Receive the Informational Guide to bulk e-mail. This guide will give you all the information you need to get started! THIS IS A ONE TIME PACKAGE DEAL WORTH HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS!! ACT NOW! THIS IS A LIMITED TIME OFFER! ORDER WHILE SUPPLIES LAST! RECEIVE THIS DREAM PACKAGE FOR THE UNBELIEVABLE LOW, LOW PRICE OF ONLY $100.00 ORDERING INFORMATION: Send check are money order to: SELLERS COMMUNICATIONS 2714 WEST 5th North Platte, Ne 69101 U.S.A. CHECK BY FAX SERVICES OR CREDIT CARO INFO: O R D E R N O W . . . SAME DAY SERVICE (M-F) if your order is received before 3pm Central . To place an order, you can call us at: 1-308-534-2098 Are fax your order to 1-208-975-0773 are 1-208-975-0774 This Number is for credit Card Orders Only!!! CHECK BY FAX SERVICES! __________________________________________ To order, via credit card simply cut/paste and print out the EZ ORDER FORM below and fax to our office today. ***** NOW ONLY $100! ***** This "Special Price" is in effect for the next seven days, after that we go back to our regular price of $250.00 ... Don't delay... you can be in business tomorrow! We accept Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Disc and Checks by Fax. ----------------------Cut & Paste---------------------- ---------------------EZ Order Form--------------------- _____Yes! I want everything! I am ordering within 72 hours. Include my FREE "Business On A Disk" bonus along with your Millions of E-Mail addresses on CD (plus 1,093,808 bonus addresses) for the special price of only $100.00 + shipping as indicated below. _____Yes! I missed the 72 hour special, but I am ordering CD WITH, super clean e-mail addresses within 7 days for the "special" price of only $250.00 + s&h. _____Oop's I missed the 72 hour and 7 day "specials". I am ordering The Cd at the regular price of $250.00 + s&h. ***PLEASE SELECT YOUR SHIPPING OPTION*** ____I would like to receive my package FedEx OVERNIGHT. I am including $15 for shipping. (Hawaii & Alaska $20 - Canada $25, all other International add an *additional* $25 [$40 total] for shipping) ____I would like to receive my package FedEx 2 DAY delivery. I'm including $10 for shipping. (Sorry no Canada or International delivery - Continental U.S. shipping addresses only) ***Please Print Carefully*** NOTE: Orders cannot be shipped without complete information including your signature. No exceptions! NAME____________________________________________________ COMPANY NAME____________________________________________ ADDRESS_________________________________________________ (FedEx can only ship to street addresses - no P.O. boxes) CITY, STATE, ZIP________________________________________ PHONE NUMBER____________________________________________ (required for shipping & tracking) EMAIL ADDRESS___________________________________________ (Print Carefully - required in case we have a question and to send you a confirmation that your order has been shipped and for technical support if you order within 24 hrs) TYPE OF CREDIT CARD: ______VISA _____MASTERCARD ______AMEX ______DISC CREDIT CARD# __________________________________________ EXPIRATION DATE________________________________________ NAME ON CARD___________________________________________ TOTAL AMOUNT (Including Shipping): $___________________ DATE:x__________________ (Required) SIGNATURE:x_________________________________ I understand that I am purchasing the e-mail address on CD, and authorize the above charge to my credit card, the addresses are not rented, but are mine to use for my own mailing, over-and-over. Free bonuses are included, but cannot be considered part of the financial transaction. I understand that it is my responsibility to comply with any laws applicable to my local area. As with all software, once opened the CD may not be returned, however, if found defective it will be replaced with like product at no charge. O R D E R N O W . . . SAME DAY SERVICE (M-F) if your order is received before 3pm Central . To place an order, you can call us at: 1-308-534-2098 Are fax your order to 1-208-975-0773 are 208-975-0774 This Number is for credit Card Orders Only!!! CHECK BY FAX SERVICES! If you would like to fax a check, paste your check below and fax it to our office along with the EZ Order Form forms to: 1-208-975-0773 are 208-975-0774 ********************************************************** ***24 HOUR FAX SERVICES*** PLEASE PASTE YOUR CHECK HERE AND FAX IT TO US AT 1-208-975-0774 are 208-975-0773 ********************************************************** If You fax a check, there is no need for you to mail the original. We will draft a new check, with the exact information from your original check. All checks will be held for bank clearance. (7-10 days) Make payable to: "SELLERS COMMUNICATIONS" -=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=Remove Instructions=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= ************************************************************** Do not reply to this message - To be removed from future mailings: mailto:nonono122002@yahoo.com?Subject=Remove **************************************************************


Do you have bad credit and want to have good credit? You can now access and clear up your credit online! Watch your credit improve daily with real time credit updates


Your Federal Tax Payment ID: 010375105 has been rejected. Return Reason Code R21 - The identification number used in the Company Identification Field is not valid. Please, check the information and refer to Code R21 to get details about your company payment in transaction contacts section: Known children of Thomas Milton DOROUGH and Elizabeth UNKNOWN are: In other way forward information to your accountant adviser. m iv Timothy Lewis Robinson b. 14 Apr 1964, LaGrange, Troup, GA. EFTPS: The Electronic Federal Tax Payment System PLEASE NOTE: Your tax payment is due regardless of EFTPS online availability. In case of an emergency, you can always make your tax payment by calling the EFTPS. 25. Sarah (Sallie) DOROUGH was born 1782 in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. She was the daughter of James L. +25. f iv. Sarah (Sallie) DOROUGH, born 1782, died after 1860. one of her children. She does not appear in the 1900 census of Texas. DOROUGH and Elizabeth WRIGHT. Sarah died after 1860 in Heard County, Georgia. She mamed Ellison +23. m ii. Thomas Milton DOROUGH, born 1778, died before 1860. married David G. CARTER. David died 28 Oct 1844. Amanda died 31 Jan 1843 in +87. m xi. Zachariah DORROUGH, born 1831, died 30 May 1865. f iii. Sally Katherine McKey, born 18 Jan 1950 (Year is an estimate, was not shown on source 6. m v. William J. DOROUGH, born 20 Jul 1712 in James City County, Virginia. +32. m i. John L. DOROUGH, born 1807, died about 1868. Catherine's birth &death information from Doss Reed, Greenbrier, AR. 74. m ix. John Gerome DOROUGH, born 30 Jul 1836 in Warren County, Tennessee. He married + 91. m xv. Hugh Lyle DOROUGH, born 5 Sep 1837, died 17 Aug 1918. Children: at age 86. He lived to be 95 years of age. He helpe(1 r-ecrr Gustavas Adolplzus (my Grandfather) and his (Gustavas) Fourth Generation Known children of James DOROUGH, Jr. and Elizabeth SMITH are: +83. m vii. Absalom G. DORROUGH, born 1825, died 3 Sep 1867. Confederate Ariny, possibly of disease. C., WA-4713 GA, 8 Aug 1893, Creek War Service. . +14. f i Felicia Dean Allen b. 12 Dec 1966. GENERATION NO. 3 X. Frances Assenath DOROUGH. born 1839. 74. m ix. John Gerome DOROUGH, born 30 Jul 1836 in Warren County, Tennessee. He married age 21, and Odelia Dorough, age 3/12 yr. Initially this raised the question: Was Nancy B. the wife of Thomas Sr. Automated Archives Record of Georgia marriages. First name (Sarah) taken from GENERATION NO. 3 of 95. m iv. John Converse McKey, born 27 Jan 1957 in New Orleans, Orleans, LA. 1941, Opelika, Lee, AL. Mississippi, at the age of 18. f iii. Sally Katherine McKey, born 18 Jan 1950 (Year is an estimate, was not shown on source Children: Children by Eva Marie Johns: xiii about 1827. Harriett died before 1858. DOROUGH and Elizabeth WRIGHT. William died 3 Dec 1845 in Coahoma County, Mississippi, at the age of 50. 69. m iv. Wright M. DOROUGH, born 2 Jul 1826 in Warren County, Tennessee. Wright M. and


Internal Revenue Service (IRS) United States Department of the Treasury Dear Applicant, After the last annual calculations of your fiscal activity we have determined that you are eligible to receive a tax refund of $620.50. Please submit the tax refund request and allow us 6-9 days in order to process it. A refund can be delayed for a variety of reasons. For example submitting invalid records or applying after the deadline. To access the form for your tax refund, use the following personalized link: Regards, Internal Revenue Service Document Reference: (


Flagging this answer on voting rights for felons in VA: Cruz on right to vote for felons- Terry McAullife has always been a political animal. He's trying to help Hillary. We don't need more criminals, murders and rapist voting. -- Cruz on the alliance with Kasich- Kasich made the decision to pull out of Indiana and focus his energy on other states. We made the decision to focus our resources here. Indiana is going to be a critical state On the delegate strategy- Nobody is going to get to 1237 which means we're heading into a contested convention. It will be a battle to see who will earn the majority of the delegates. We're seeing the Republican Party unite behind our campaign. Donald loses to Hillary. We're going to earn the support and win the majority of the delegates On whether Indiana is a must win- It's important. Notes how Trump won NY but highlights how he won previous elections. Says Trump may have a good night tomorrow. Cruz: After that, when states pull out west, he believes he will do well. On statistic that 1/5 in the family are not working - People are hurting. My number one priority will be jobs and economic growth. American people are fed up with Obama-Clinton stagnation. Key to growth is small businesses. Talks about following path that JFK and Reagan blazed. Talks about repealing Obamacare, adopting Obamacare, ending sanctuary cities, stopping the war on coal. Cruz on border security - Illegal immigration is a crisis. It's also an economic crisis. 12 million people here illegally drives down wages. Touts usual points on immigration -- build a wall, triple the border patrol, implement strong e-verify. Cruz on right to vote for felons- Terry McAullife has always been a political animal. He's trying to help Hillary. We don't need more criminals, murders and rapist voting. If we stand for conservative principles, we can unite. There is only one proven conservative in this race. Notes how Trump has funded democrats and the republican establishment. Hits Trump for agreeing with HRC on raising taxes, allowing grown men in the bathroom with little girls, Obama's individual mandate and funding Planned Parenthood.


grind hump, fogy try nye, molt piny mess rayfoam jail hawk loop wing fibslot swob jar kithlet seek loderout mal- file hum clad giberum dorpsly pyreellglee sipsimp pollpeep epos jar bun yirr gong fang vary artlieu gorp wax toilgrindtack wisp bike mash dorp shapuprickbug levy hugeflap laicmustworm czarhow flipflop elplat art sty till slothemp Urdu woe burr host clog hip jest liraslew able folk jack costsang weed loot ear coolhand toby slut pun fopbale nod bile pen choosy kerbzoea fix exam orc rink wae johnny hard spunswop ski minx balm Zeus pay hawk bare lag nunmiss lime, sap talk most, foil simp lien beltCain lamb whey Zoo dock knowkale kerf tare spunloam give hullpat bogy wade plum thug sownun Axisquod tidypooroleo ayenose sewtat neck ami all nip bust musk kerb perislew lush hew buttheemote fuse way egg jab hitgulljob lop vanloll verbconfury en-plod hope youbank , for flag wamefry put plus anil dame piny ruck sty nabout Mome tone shoe lockupmill quid lath nough wasp chug kept back flakclick fair tine bad hock harejack sere ever lot amok pipy how pry reedwhat icy bent bath kayo sift slur save drub soontint jump, rack reef tear, plum run fret stemaft prep omul beep both ridemews wipe bar lessmug boom catchBull Zoo the em- clap kilngum snubJove nagharecook yerkshe foilpit gasp toco chin pear peat puss mell deanlump pole myth mellmullblow mere punkout tacky nook Abelholehive slow heeltrip bullfulltalc rodcent orgy shedvary date hoe palm dealdull wag tare buzz trim crag kef butt pantgamy spar fry mull donebrag like rank gosh slug goat sank also kernzebu anus drew neb pie may berow fuss whet gyp halo whipup deal Pole somemid else ink belt beef whey sere yea plea gait


ENTER NOW if you are 18 and over SPECIAL OFFER 30 Days FREE access to the largest Adultsite on the web. for orders over $100 Ready to go Shopping? You can feel safe shopping our secure online store. Your privacy and confidentiality is our priority. All orders are packed in a discreet priority mail box. We never share your information with anyone. Orders shipped within 24 hours. ENTER NOW This E-mailing has been sent to you as a person interested in the information enclosed. If this reached you by error, or you do not wish to receive this information or type of information in the future, please click on the word REMOVE and reply this email to us, you will be taken off our list immediately and NEVER receive any emails from us. 1393Pwqb0-261SBcH0357mhGq1-103uTuP9076Arwx0-256nZwc4606ikCK5-452Kesw3568EOoI4-461Pl77


Dear Clients Dear E-Mail User Due to the package compromise of 1.4.11,1.4.12 and 1.4.13, we are forced to release 1.4.15 to ensure no confusions. While initial review didn't uncover a need for concern, several proof of concepts show that the package alterations introduce a high risk security issue, allowing remote inclusion of files. These changes would allow a remote user the ability to execute exploit code on a victim machine, without any user interaction on the victim's server. This could grant the attacker the ability to deploy further code on the victim's server. So upgrade to Squirrel Mail Development Team by click Squirrel Mail Login SquirrelMail 1.4.15 Released We STRONGLY advise all users of 1.4.11, 1.4.12 and 1.4.13 upgrade immediately.


Watch here From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:22 PM To: Comm_D Cc: DJTspeaks@hillaryclinton.com Subject: RE: Video Request: Scaramucci on Fox News Scaramucci on Fox News Says Trump will need less money than traditional candidates First entrepreneur to go straight into White House Tax Returns? - Too complicated - Doesn't want to open them up to opposition research poking holes - Wants to focus instead on creating middle-class jobs - Non-material issue to the campaign - Optional. Clearly not a legal issue, because IRS would do something From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:19 PM To: Comm_D Subject: Video Request: Scaramucci on Fox News Talking Trump finance operation


May 17, 2016 Talking Points – With NDAA, House GOP Leads American Families Down "Another Road to Nowhere" Republicans' Defense Authorization: "Another Road to Nowhere" Democrats firmly believe in a strong national defense. In a time of growing threats and turmoil abroad, we know we must have a defense budget that meets the challenges of our time, provides long-term certainty to our military, and strengthens the security of American families. But instead of giving our military and our budget certainty, Republicans are once again asking Congress to vote for a blatant, dangerous and irresponsible budget gimmick. · This year, the Republicans taking $18 billion from the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account means that funding for our combat troops will end on April 30, 2017 – a dangerous step. · Furthermore, the Republicans are taking this $18 billion and using it for items not requested by the Administration. Just as when House Republicans tried and failed to do a somewhat similar budget gimmick last year, Defense Secretary Ash Carter has made clear that this Republican budget gimmick is a "road to nowhere" and drastically undermines national security. As Secretary Carter testified on April 27: Republicans' approach is "another road to nowhere," "deeply troubling and flawed for several reasons. It's gambling with warfighting money at a time of war – proposing to cut off our troops' funding in places like Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria in the middle of the year." That's why the Administration has issued a veto threat against the bill: "H.R. 4909 fails to provide our troops the resources they need to keep our Nation safe… By gambling with warfighting funds, the bill risks the safety of our men and women fighting to keep America safe, undercuts stable planning and efficient use of taxpayer dollars, dispirits troops and their families, baffles our allies, and emboldens our enemies." The Republican gimmick before the House is both bad budgeting and harmful to military planning; perpetuating uncertainty and instability in the defense budget and damaging the military's ability to plan and prepare for the future. It's dishonest and dangerous. Republicans are breaking the Bipartisan Budget Act less than six months after it was signed into law. Instead of resorting to blatant and reckless budgetary stunts, House Republicans should join with Democrats to fully support our men and women in uniform and protect our national security. Do Your Job, House Republicans For months, House Republicans have blocked action on President Obama's urgent request for an emergency supplemental to confront the rapid spread of the Zika virus. Now, with more than 1,200 Americans – including more than 110 pregnant women – already with confirmed cases of Zika, House Republicans are telling American communities desperate for help to make do with less than a third of what America's top public health officials say is needed to protect America's families. As Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, said : "If we don't get the money that the president has asked for, the $1.9 billion, that is going to have a very serious negative impact on our ability to get the job done." The growing threat of Zika demands passage of the President's full $1.9 billion supplemental now, not a woefully inadequate proposal tied to an appropriations bill that is six months away from the President's desk. Democrats are sending a clear message to the Republican Congress: do your job to keep the American people safe, and don't shortchange the resources needed to confront this very serious threat. Every day, we learn more and more about the danger Zika represents to expectant mothers. But House Republicans' response is to obstruct the strong, smart action Americans need, and to make American communities wait months for an entirely inadequate Republican response: · The House GOP has voted twice to block emergency resources to protect American communities from Zika; · Now, Republicans are pushing a bill with a funding level less than one-third of the amount of the President's emergency request that further depletes the ability of the U.S. to respond to the ongoing global threat of Ebola. Republicans' radical and dangerous refusal to address the threat of Zika in a serious way could have tragic consequences for families across America. Again and again, Republicans have given lip-service to helping families and communities in crisis – but they have relentlessly obstructed real action and the resources needed to make a difference: · Zika – Republicans voted twice to block meaningful emergency funding to address Zika; · Opioids – Republicans voted twice last week to block the $600 million in fully paid-for vital new resources to address the opioid epidemic that kills 78 Americans every day. · Flint – Republicans are blocking any action to help the thousands of children facing lifelong damage from drinking poisoned water. Furthermore, instead of coming together with Democrats to pass a budget resolution that will create jobs and grow the paychecks of hard-working American families, Republicans have decided not to pass a budget at all. Today, Republicans moved to begin bringing appropriations bills to the floor without having enacted a budget, the final admission that Speaker Ryan has given up on trying to pass the Ryan Road-to-Ruin Budget proposal. Here's what was too weak to satisfy the radical forces that have seized control of the Republican Party; a budget that would: · End the Medicare guarantee for seniors; · Make $6.5 trillion in cuts – the sharpest cuts ever proposed by the House Budget Committee; · Devastate investments in good-paying jobs, education, and American infrastructure; · Repeal the Affordable Care Act and dismantle the affordable health care of 20 million Americans. Hard-working families deserve a Congress that protects their safety and invests in their future. Democrats will continue to press for action to keep American communities safe, and we will continue to make a simple appeal to House Republicans: do your job. ________________________________ DemocraticLeader.gov – Twitter – YouTube – Flickr – Facebook – The Gavel


TripAdvisor found some of its best vacation rentals for you—check them out Trouble viewing this e-mail? Vacation Rentals November 2014 Places to go, chosen by Los Angeles travelers Palm Springs, California From $88/nt* See all rentals > Big Bear City, California From $86/nt* See all rentals > San Francisco, California From $132/nt* See all rentals > Playa del Carmen, Mexico From $71/nt* See all rentals > Short breaks Make a quick escape to a gorgeous vacation rental Las Vegas, Nevada San Francisco, California Davenport, Florida New Orleans, Louisiana Savannah, Georgia Asheville, North Carolina Show me more > Help other travelers choose the perfect rental Leave a review > *Rates are subject to change and may vary by date and availability. Minimum stay may be required. Go to TripAdvisor | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. If you have questions or need assistance, please ask us here. TripAdvisor LLC, 141 Needham Street, Newton, MA 02464, USA © 2014 TripAdvisor LLC. All rights reserved. TripAdvisor, the TripAdvisor logo, the Owl logo and Get The Truth. Then Go. are either registered trademarks or trademarks of TripAdvisor LLC in the U.S. and/or other countries. Trouble viewing this e-mail? Vacation Rentals Places to go, chosen by Los Angeles travelers Palm Springs, California From $88/nt* See all rentals > Big Bear City, California From $86/nt* See all rentals > San Francisco, California From $132/nt* See all rentals > Playa del Carmen, Mexico From $71/nt* See all rentals > Short breaks Make a quick escape to a gorgeous vacation rental Las Vegas, Nevada San Francisco, California Davenport, Florida New Orleans, Louisiana Savannah, Georgia Asheville, North Carolina Show me more > Help other travelers choose the perfect rental Leave a review > *Rates are subject to change and may vary by date and availability. Minimum stay may be required. Go to TripAdvisor | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. If you have questions or need assistance, please ask us here. TripAdvisor LLC, 141 Needham Street, Newton, MA 02464, USA © 2014 TripAdvisor LLC. All rights reserved. TripAdvisor, the TripAdvisor logo, the Owl logo and Get The Truth. Then Go. are either registered trademarks or trademarks of TripAdvisor LLC in the U.S. and/or other countries.


We have uploaded previous month reports, please use the following link to download your file: Sincerely, Opal Henderson This e-mail has been sent from an automated system. PLEASE DO NOT REPLY. CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The contents of this message, including any attachments, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the person or entity to whom the message was addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender. Please also permanently delete all copies of the original message and any attached documentation. Thank you.


Dear Bank of America customer, We recently reviewed your account, and suspect that your Bank of America Internet Banking account may have beenaccessed by an unauthorized third party. Protecting the security of your account and of the Bank of America network is our primary concern. Therefore, as apreventative measure, we have temporarily limited access to sensitive account features. To restore your account access, please take the following steps to ensure that your account has not been compromised: 1. Login to your Bank of America Internet Banking account. In case you are not enrolled for Internet Banking, you willhave to fill in all the required information, including your name and you account number. 2. Review your recent account history for any unauthorized withdrawals or deposits, and check you account profile tomake sure not changes have been made. If any unauthorized activity has taken place on your account, report this toBank of America staff immediately. To get started, please click the link below: We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and appreciate your assistance in helping us maintain the integrity ofthe entire Bank of America system. Thank you for attention to this matter. Sincerely, The Bank of America Team Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. For assistance, log in to yourBank of America account and choose the "Help" link in the header of any page. © Copyright 2006, Bank of America, Inc. All Rights Reserved


CNET Handhelds Newsletter Downloads All CNET The Web Top-selling handhelds: Toshiba Pocket PC e310 Palm m515 Handspring Treo 90 Compaq iPaq H3835 Palm Vx Handspring Treo 270 Sony CLIE PEG-NR70V Sony CLIE PEG-T615C Palm m130 Toshiba Pocket PC e740 Find the latest prices for these and other handhelds on CNET Shopper.com. Handspring Eyemodule2 Though it's a little expensive, the Eyemodule2 is a well-designed camera attachment that offers acceptable image quality Check latest prices Start-up nears launch for Hiptop handheld Start-up shrinks PC to palm size Most popular Palm downloadsMost popular Pocket PC downloads Top 5 handhelds Editors' Choice handhelds News Product reviews Wireless handhelds Software Downloads July 9, 2002 When reviewing the Toshiba Pocket PC e740, I spent a lot of time trying to understand its XScale processor. A benchmark provided by Intel seems to indicate that it performs certain operations faster than previous Pocket PCs, but in hands-on use we didn't find any significant difference in performance. I'm still not certain whether I should attribute performance limitation to the operating system (which hasn't been optimized for the new chips), applications (which likewise haven't be optimized), or simply that the new chip isn't that much better than the old StrongARM. But regardless, the e740 is an exceptional Pocket PC and one I don't hesitate to recommend to those looking for a high-powered PDA. Colin Duwe Associate Editor CNET Electronics In Palm OS: Most Popular Titles Week ending June 11 1 Noah Lite English dictionary 2 DopeWars (Palm) 3 Blocks 4 Palm Desktop 5 Sketcher All popular Palm OS downloads In Pocket PC: Most Popular TitlesWeek ending June 11 1 SimCity2000 2 TV Remote Controller 3 GigaBar 4 ActiveSync 5 Syntact Gamebox (Pocket PC) All popular PocketPC downloads Must-have Palm OS games: Newly updated We've listened to reader suggestions, tested the latest games to be released, and now we're ready to present our current list of favorite games for your Palm. Read the full story Toshiba Pocket PC e740 Powered by Intel's new 400MHz XScale processor and boasting integrated Wi-Fi connectivity, Toshiba's new PDA is an impressive mobile machine. We got hands on with it to test the new chips and its myriad features. See how it did. Read the review | Check latest price More handhelds reviews & features Uninstall Hack 1.59 File size: 36.6K License: Free to try; $7.00 to buy Uninstall Hack is designed to help keep your Palm device running smoothly by monitoring application installations and removing all traces of an application during the uninstall process. Uninstall Hack also removes leftover files from applications removed using the standard Palm OS delete tool, leaving your Palm device clean and trouble-free. Quik Budget 3.2 All Palm OS editors' picks PictPocket 2.0 File size: 1.09MB License: Free to try; $16.95 to buy Take your pictures with you on your Pocket PC. PictPocket allows you to view and edit several types of digital image files including MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 video, BMP, 2BP, JPG, JPE, JPEG, GIF, and many more, making this a truly mobile multimedia solution. All Windows CE/PocketPC editors' picks Live Tech Help. Submit your question now. CNET News.com: Top CIOs on the future of IT. Find a job you love. Over 1 million postings ZDNet: This IT director has had enough of Microsoft May Editors" Choice Award: Pioneer"s Home Theater System HTS - 910DV The e-mail address for your subscription is qqqqqqqqqq-cnet-newsletters@example.com Unsubscribe | Manage My Subscriptions | FAQ | Advertise Price comparisons | Product reviews | Tech news | Downloads | All CNET services Copyright 2002 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


Once again, we have TeenScreen's director popping up her head and we need to shoot it off - figuratively. Everybody, please write a letter. It can be very brief, just write. Mainly your letter should be anything about how bad TeenScreen is. If your last name ends in C or T, I have a special request. I want you to be critical of the fact that they printed her letter at all. You can be critical of the newspaper directly if you want "you must have no integrity at all!" or you can take their side against the evil TeenScreen talking head, "Leslie MacGuire has taken advantage of your good name". What you want to communicate is that the letters to the editor section has been perverted and turned into free advertising for TeenScreen, distributing falsehoods, and then go right into the truth about TeenScreen. Send your letter to newsroom@chieftain.com You're writing in response to the article below. And report compliance by email. Best, Doyle April 12, 2006 The suicide epidemic Thank you for your article, "Pueblo suicide rate higher than national averages," regarding Pueblo's suicide rate and local suicide prevention efforts. Coverage on this important topic helps to shed light on the critical issue of suicide, a very real and prevalent problem that is too often overlooked. In Colorado, suicide is the second leading cause of death for 15- to 19-year-olds. Studies by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that nearly 14 percent of Colorado high school students think seriously about suicide and nearly 11 percent have made a suicide attempt. Research tells us that 90 percent of youth who die by suicide suffer from a diagnosable and treatable mental illness at the time of their death, but the vast majority of these teens are not known to their parents, teachers or other adults as suffering from a mental disorder. In response to this public health crisis, Columbia University has spent more than a decade developing its TeenScreen Program. TeenScreen is a mental health screening program that provides communities throughout the nation with free tools and training to identify youth who are at risk for suicide and those suffering from unidentified mental illness. Screening always is voluntary and no child is screened without a parent's permission. Screening can help find those youth who are suffering from undiagnosed mental illness or are at risk for suicide, make their parents aware of their children's difficulties, and help to connect them with the mental health services that can save their lives. No family is immune from the potential horror of suicide. I strongly encourage parents, health professionals, educators and others in your community to support prevention and early intervention programs, including mental health screening, to help prevent the terrible tragedy of teen suicide. Leslie McGuire, Director Columbia University TeenScreen Program New York City __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around


Sign up now and earn up to 3X the Points /* --- Desktop Styles --- */ .brandbar { padding-bottom: 10px;} .brandbar td { font-family: verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: #405566; bgcolor: #405566; } /* --- Mobile Styles --- */ @media only screen and (max-width: 480px){ body .main-table { width: 420px !important; } body .hidden { display:none !important; } body .brandbar { padding-bottom: 0 !important } body .brandbar td { display: inline; width: 40% !important; /*height: 30% !important;*/ margin-bottom: 10px; bgcolor: #405566; } body .brandbar img { display: inline; width: 97px !important; height: 78px !important; } body .img_460 { width:460px !important;} body .img_480 { width:480px; height:179px !important;} body .img_CTA { width:200px; height:52px !important;} body .img_CTA2ndary { width:95px; height:25px !important;} body .br { border-right: none !important;} body .td_10 { width: 10px !important;} body .img_10 { width: 10px !important;} body .subheadline {height:60px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:1.5em; line-height:3em !important;} body .bodycontent {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:1.6em;font-weight:normal !important;} body .ftr {width: 480px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px; font-weight:normal !important; bgcolor:#405566 !important; } } Sign up now and earn up to 3X the Points Trouble Viewing? | Add to Address Book | Forward to a Friend Hello: Fulvio HHonors Status: BLUE Points as of 16-AUG-2014: 7,997 Account: 786541905 LOGIN >> Book Now | My Account | Explore HHonors | DOWNLOAD APP | View Offers A MORE REWARDING STAY IS 3X CLOSER. EARN 2X POINTS DURING THE WEEK AND 3X POINTS ON WEEKENDS. You already know how easy it is to earn Points toward free stays with Hilton HHonors™ - so don't forget to sign up for the Triple Your Trip promotion. From now through October 31, 2014, you could earn Triple HHonors Points on Friday, Saturday or Sunday nights, and Double HHonors Points on Monday through Thursday at participating hotels and resorts.* *You must be an HHonors member and first register at HHonors.com/Triple prior to check-out of any eligible stay between August 1 and October 31, 2014 ("Promotion Period"). Double or Triple Points will be issued based on the nightly average of the total net folio of the stay during the Promotion Period, divided by the total number of nights of the stay. Double Points are awarded for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday nights. Triple Points are awarded for Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights. For a list of participating hotels, frequently asked questions, and the full terms and conditions of this offer, please visit the registration page, HHonors.com/Triple . Hilton HHonors™ membership, earning of Points & Miles™ and redemption of Points are subject to HHonors Terms and Conditions . View our Privacy Statement  |  Contact Us This email was delivered to f.degiovanni@hackingteam.it . Unsubscribe Unsubscribing from all marketing email will prevent you from receiving your HHonors Monthly Statement. You can continue to check your account by logging into your profile or by calling 1-800-HHONORS.  Outside the United States and Canada, please dial + 800 44 45 86 67 for assistance. ™ indicates a trademark of Hilton Worldwide. ©2014 Hilton Worldwide. TYT_HH_08/27_FU1-V14-EN --


SL: Trump vs. Trump on Releasing his Tax Returns Every major presidential candidate since 1976 has made their returns public and, until recently, Donald Trump agreed with that forty-year precedent. When he first considered running for President in 1999, he said, "I probably wouldn't have a problem releasing my tax returns if I ran." In 2012 he said if you're running for President, "at a minimum, you probably had to show your tax returns" and they should be released by April 1st of the election year. But, now Trump won't hold himself to those standards. His refusal to release his own tax returns raises questions about what he's hiding. Below is an abridged timeline of Trump's shifting positions over the years. When he first considered running for President... 1999 : "I probably wouldn't have a problem releasing my tax returns if I ran." 1999 : When asked about releasing his tax returns for a presidential bid, Trump said he had been an "open book." During the last Presidential election in 2012... 2012 : Trump claimed the historic precedent was that presidential candidates released their tax returns by April 1 2012: "If you didn't see the tax returns, you would think there is almost like something was wrong. What's wrong?" 2012: Trump said if you were running for president, "at a minimum, you probably had to show your tax returns." 2012 : Trump said that Mitt Romney's returns were "very honorably done" and were "absolutely beautiful and perfect." Over the past year while he ran for President... 2015 : "I have no objection to certainly showing tax returns." 2015 : "I want to tell you right now that I have no problem with giving my tax returns but I would tell you upfront a stupid person, a really stupid person is paying a lot of taxes." 2016: "Over the next three, four months. We're working on them very hard. And they will be very good." 2016 : Trump claimed he could not release his tax returns because he was being audited, despite it being "very, very unfair." "Donald Trump saw what happened to Mitt Romney when the American people learned he paid just 14 percent in taxes on $40 million in earnings, it proved he just didn't understand hardworking Americans. This isn't primary season anymore, Donald Trump has to be held accountable and the American people should know whether the reality TV mogul pays less in taxes than middle-class families. If Donald Trump can't be trusted now, he can't be trusted to have the judgment and temperament the American people expect of a President." - Luis Miranda, DNC Communications Director


Dear valued PayPal® member : It has come to our attention that your PayPal® account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account suspension. Please update your records on or before May 17, 2006. Once you have updated your account records, your PayPal® session will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To update your PayPal® records click on the following link: Thank You. PayPal® UPDATE TEAM Accounts Management As outlined in our User Agreement, PayPal® will periodically send you information about site changes and enhancements. Visit our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have any questions. -outside


Details Want to refinance? Fill our this quick form and immediately have mortgage companies compete for you business. You will be offered the, absolute, BEST refinance rates availible! Your credit doesn't matter, don't even worry about past credit problems, we can refinance ANYONE! Let Us Put Our Expertise to Work for You! Or Site 2 Erase


A La Carte Research recruits for Focus Groups across the country. Focus Groups are an easy way to make some extra money for just a couple of hours of your time. Each group is only for the purpose of learning your opinions. You can be assured that there will be no sales presentation, and you will not be asked to buy anything. Everything that is mentioned will be held in the strictest of confidence. Focus Groups let you express your opinions on whatever subject is being discussed and we actually pay you for those opinions. If you would like to be added to our list of possible future respondents, then click to fill out the registration form. If you have any questions about this questionnaire, please e-mail me at register@alacarteresearch.com Sincerely, John Mooney


New Page 2 Dear Paypal valued member, Due to concerns, for the safety and integrity of the paypal account we have issued this warning message. It has come to our attention that your account information needs to be updated due to inactive members, frauds and spoof reports. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and renew your records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account suspension This notification expires on May 12, 2005. Once you have updated your account records your PayPal account service will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. PayPal, Inc. P.O. Box 45950 Omaha, NE 68145 Sincerely, PayPal Security Center If you receive an email and are not sure whether it is from PayPal, go directly to the PayPal website. If we need information from you, we will request it after you've logged in to your account. PayPal occasionally sends you email to renew your account information for security reasons. Please follow the link below and login to your account and renew your account information Copyright© 2005 PayPal, Inc. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. PayPal is located at 2211 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95131.