May 12, 2016 Contact: Drew Hammill/Evangeline George 202-226-7616 Transcript of Pelosi Press Conference Today Washington, D.C. – Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi held her weekly press conference today. Below is a transcript of the press conference. Leader Pelosi. Good morning, good morning. I guess none of you stayed up late to watch the Golden State Warriors win again, 125 points. High scoring game. Nice work by Portland, 121 points, very high scoring. But that ends that series. I don't know, basketball that starts at 10:30 at night is getting a little late. Some of you were with us yesterday when Members of our leadership talked about Mr. Trump's comments being a direct continuation or reflection of what Republicans in the House have been saying all along. My question to Republicans who are shocked by what Mr. Trump has been saying with his crassness and crudeness is: Since when? Since when have you been surprised about this? Mr. Trump has said Islam hates us, complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States. And the Homeland Security Chairman, Peter King, said we have, unfortunately, too many mosques in this country, this is an enemy living among us. On the birther claims, Trump said he, meaning President Obama, doesn't have a birth certificate. He has one, but there's something on that, maybe religion, maybe it says he is a Muslim. This is a candidate for President of the United States. Shocking he would say that. But that's what is said in the House by our Republican colleagues, one of them Mike Coffman, "I don't know whether Barack Obama was born in the United States of America. I don't know that. But I do know this, that in his heart, he's not an American. He's just not an American." Trump has said about immigrants, Mexican immigrants are bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists. That's what he said about Mexican immigrants. Steve King, no relation to Chairman Peter King, said, "For every one who's a valedictorian, there are another hundred out there who weigh 130 pounds and have calves the size of cantaloupes because they're hauling in 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert." Another shocking Trump remark: "Women should face some form of punishment for their reproductive health decisions, and their doctors as well." You know, he went on to say that. Republicans right now are putting researchers, doctors, and women in danger. The Select Committee, a secret subpoena represents a dangerous Republican descent into anti-woman McCarthyism, a brazen campaign of intimidation. This morning, you probably have seen it, this morning Democrats on the committee sent a letter to Speaker Ryan calling the committee's abusive conduct and blatant violations of House rules, calling for the committee to be disbanded. That's what the Republicans have been doing. And the Republican establishment, they are shocked at what Trump has said when it is a direct reflection of what goes on here all the time with people in power to bring their vitriol to committee, to the floor, to legislation. Instead of addressing the needs of the American people, Republicans are dangerously obstructing action on the real crises facing our country. This week, the House is acting on a number of good, bipartisan opioid bills, some with House Democrats as lead sponsors. However, Republicans are refusing to provide the emergency funding that is needed to make the difference. Just to have the statement is interesting, a conversation, but it's not effective without the resources. The Republicans are refusing to provide the emergency funding that is needed to make a real difference in American communities facing the opioid tragedy. Seventy eight Americans die of an opioid overdose every day. Our Members, Democrats and Republicans, see this in their communities. That's why they are passing these nice bills. But it's hard to understand why they're not putting the resources for communities to deal with it. Yesterday, Republicans voted to block Democrats' bill for $600 million in desperately needed, fully paid for – fully paid for – new resources to address the opioid crisis. That was proposed by Congresswoman Kuster of New Hampshire, who has been working on this issue for a long time. Then, of course, we have Zika. Already more than 1,000 Americans, including more than 100 pregnant women, have confirmed cases of Zika. Last month, House Republicans voted twice to block emergency funding. And it's just a remarkable thing that this is a threat, it's going to even get worse as we get into warmer weather. So today at 1 p.m., Democrats are holding a Steering and Policy hearing with Dr. Anthony Fauci of the NIH, Dr. Anne Schuchat of the CDC, and Mayor Mitch Landrieu of New Orleans to talk about this. They will discuss how essential it is for Congress to swiftly act on the $1.9 billion request of the Obama Administration to meet the Zika threat. And as far as opioid addiction, do your job. Zika, do your job. Flint, Flint, challenges the conscience of our country. Refuse to do an emergency funding bill. Do your job, Congress. Do your job. Do you have any questions? Yes, Nancy. Q: Leader Pelosi, there was a lot of controversy on the Republican side over Speaker Ryan's decision to withhold his support from Donald Trump, at least for now. Do you think that that was a brave move of his, a principled move? Leader Pelosi. Well, I recall, as I am sure you do, that the Speaker withheld his acceptance of being Speaker until they came to terms on the Republican side. The appearance was that Republicans had to measure up to his requirements. The reality was that he had to live up to their requirements. And I think that's what we're seeing again. Brave? No, I don't think there is anything brave about it. But again, I don't usually go into what's happening on the Republican side. That's up to them. The people have spoken. They are about to have a nominee. It's up to them to figure it out. But my point is that what would be courageous about it? That the Speaker is saying he doesn't want to be associated with Donald Trump because of his comments? I've never heard him make one comment about the comments, the outrageous, vitriolic comments made by Republicans in Congress. Is it about disagreement on the budget, where the Ryan budget is one that would voucherize Medicare? Is that part of the debate today? Is it about policy? Is it about politics? I just don't know. I am not in those meetings. I would be the last to know. But all I can say is I hope, I hope that one thing that comes out of it is a decision to lift the debate to a different place worthy of the office of President of the United States, worthy of the American people, and that would be progress. Because right now they've taken this discussion to such a low place, it's no wonder people are frustrated with the political process and with government in general. So, again, the success of it would be if there were a decision to say, "Let us just go out there and talk about what our vision is for America, elections are about the future, what is it that we have to say about the future?" rather than engage in the politics of personal destruction and mistaking cruelty for wit. They've had their fun. Now let's get serious. Yes, sir? Q: As I understand it, there are two sticking points in the Puerto Rican bill, at least two. One involves waiving the Federal minimum wage and the overtime rules, as well as this land transfer from Vieques from the National Seashore. Would Democrats support the bill if those provisions, as the Republicans have drafted them, remain in the bill? Leader Pelosi. Well, I don't know what your source is, but the debate on Puerto Rico has been a little broader than that. We have had an issue of what will work in terms of restructuring, how the makeup and the scope of the board is in furtherance of having the restructuring work. Issues that relate to language about pensions and minimum wage, et cetera, are also part of that discussion and relate to the makeup and the scope of the board. And the Vieques issue is there, but that doesn't relate to the restructuring. So it just doesn't come down to that. But we are making progress. We're having very constructive conversations. I think we're going to have to pretty soon come down to something because another deadline is racing toward Puerto Rico. But, again, these negotiations have been going on, conversations have been going on in good faith, and I am optimistic that we will either come to some agreement soon or just realize that we can't. But I'm optimistic that we can. Q: So you don't expect a bill to be filed today then? Leader Pelosi. It could. It could. It could be filed. It was supposed to be filed yesterday, they put it off to today. It could be filed today. I don't mean right this minute, but the day is young. Yes, ma'am? Q: There are conversations on the Senate side about adding a Zika supplemental to the Military Construction VA spending bill. Are there similar conversations on the House side? Leader Pelosi. What is happening on the Senate side is completely inadequate, $1.1 billion. The administration has asked for $1.9 billion. And so, as I said before to all of you, that's not half a loaf, that's half a shoe. You can't get there from here. The scientific documentation calls for $1.9 billion and that's what we need to see in an emergency supplemental or some other vehicle. Q: Would Democrats consider adding that as a floor amendment? Leader Pelosi. I'm sorry, what? Q: $1.9 billion. Leader Pelosi. Well, we do it almost every day in one form or another, the parliamentary opportunities that we have, motion to recommit or previous question and the rest. We just keep calling upon the Speaker to address the emergency needs of the American people. If we were talking a year ago, we wouldn't be talking about Zika, would we now? It's an emergency. It's an emergency and it's a very big threat. Now, we don't want to be instilling fear. What we're saying is there is a way to deal with this, let's get it up front instead of coming after it after it's out of the barn. The opioids, I mean this is in the here and now. It's actually been in the here and now for a while. We need emergency funding. If they say, "Well, we can take it out of something else," we have caps. If we take it out of something else we are in a lamb-eat-lamb situation on the committee of jurisdiction there. What, are you going to take it out of maternal and child health, which is one of the suggestions that has been made? So we need emergency funding for that. And Flint. If anything would challenge the conscience of a nation, the well-being of these children by a decision that was made by the Governor of the State, we have a responsibility. And we're even saying we'll just do matching, we'll just do matching funds there. But to your point specifically on Zika, the 1.1 doesn't do the job, and the job needs to be done. Yes, sir? Q: Can I ask you, you mentioned Flint. The Senate has talked about providing the Flint money in the water resources development bill. Is that something that Democrats might be open to in the House or do you really see this as something that needs to be on a spending bill? Or where would you like to see it? Leader Pelosi. Well, the thing is, is that, first of all, I don't know how much money you're talking about. Do you? Q: It's a couple hundred million. Leader Pelosi. It's a question of, is that money or is that authorization? And that's really what the problem is. With the opioids, we're authorizing all the time, but we're not allocating, appropriating one penny. And so what we're talking about is the legal tender to be able to meet the needs, not just a policy that is in a bill. So if they're talking about an appropriation, then that's one thing. If they're talking about an authorization, that's interesting, but it doesn't do the job. Q: Where do you think it should go? Do you think it should go on a spending bill? Leader Pelosi. I think it should be an emergency – did we know about – some people knew about Flint a year ago. It's not in the budget agreement because the budget agreement has caps, so it has to be emergency funding. And then we have to take a look more broadly, from an authorizing standpoint, at what our needs are nationally in terms of our infrastructure that relates to water and lead, et cetera, that our children are being exposed to. But that's another issue, not separate, but a broader issue that relates to Flint. But it's really sad, if you've been there to see the impact that the lead has on the children. And there are answers, but they take some resources. Yes, sir? Q: The DHS last week had some new numbers about migration at the southern border, and it reveals that in the first 6 months of the fiscal year the number of kids and families being apprehended are on par with 2014, when there was the big border crisis, much higher than they were last year. I'm wondering if you have any sense of why that's happening, of whatever they had done last year to depress those numbers is not working this time around? And you had a lot of criticism of how those kids were being handled. Leader Pelosi. Handled. Uh huh. Q: And also politically, if you fear that another border surge this summer would play right into somebody like Donald Trump, who is painting this picture of a border out of control and wants to build the wall and all those other things? Leader Pelosi. Well, first of all, it's important to note that what we're talking about here are refugees and asylum seekers. This is a bit of a different – I don't think that that's what somebody like Donald Trump, to use your term, is talking about. He's talking about migration into the United States. And actually, the migration into the United States is negative by over 150 , 160 , 170,000 more people are going into Mexico than are coming – from the U.S. into Mexico – than are coming into the United States. So it's important to note that. Does the situation in Central America, the Northern Triangle of countries there, of violence, of well-founded fear of violence and persecution, is that a factor with all of these people? Well, you have to decide on a case by case basis. But that was one of the purposes of our trip to Latin America last week, was to say: this is a regional, hemispheric challenge that we face. We have to address the situation where it exists in the Northern Triangle, in the countries in Central America. We spoke to the President of Mexico at some length about what can happen to prescreen people in Mexico so that they don't make the trek across Mexico to find out that they do not even make the first cut to seek asylum or to be a refugee. Being a refugee has one of the toughest set of standards for entry into the country. So these are two different things, and we have to handle the refugee, asylum seeker, unaccompanied children, some with their moms, in a way that is, again, regional, to work with the Mexican Government, to go to the source of the problem, and see how we can allocate resources there rather than having the challenge here in our own country, because that is really what is better for these children. And they are all God's children. Q: But based on the rising numbers, do you anticipate a surge this summer like we saw in 2014? Leader Pelosi. Well, I was hoping that we could, as I just mentioned, in addressing how we can have assistance from other countries in the region. We talked about it in Peru and in Chile, as well as to what the absorptive capacity could be of some of those countries for some legitimate asylum seekers and refugees, not economic, people seeking a better life. That's a different story and that has its own legal process. So it's really just about those in that special category that we're talking about. It's a very dangerous crossing to cross the desert, a child, a young girl. There are some really sad stories. I just sent a letter to the President again, as did my colleagues, about our concerns about how we meet the needs of these people in their own countries or in transit, and even before they get here, but also when they get here. It's a big challenge. And, again, as the whole world is facing – not the whole world – a good part of the Northern Hemisphere is facing a refugee challenge, well known to us in Syria and Iraq, et cetera. We have some responsibility to absorb some people, and I think we can do a little better job in how we make those transitions. It's challenging. Again, in recent times, and this is within the past few years, that a new situation has emerged largely because of what's happening in their countries of origin. So we have appropriated, last year, resources to go to those countries to address some of those concerns, and we have to make sure that works. Yes, sir? Q: If there is not an agreement with the Democrats and the GOP doesn't have the votes to move the Puerto Rico bill, would the Obama administration implement some executive action? Leader Pelosi. The President has done just about everything that he can do by executive action. Some of this requires congressional legislation, and that's why we're engaged in this conversation. But I would be a little more optimistic and hopeful that we can find common ground. There are some issues that are central to the workability of the legislation and some that are not directly related, and we have to at some point make a distinction there. But in the meantime, what we want to do is have a restructuring proposal that works, a board that is respectful of the people of Puerto Rico and enables the restructuring to work and weighs in on the pension, pay, and overtime considerations in a way that is respectful, as well as resolving the Vieques land transfer that is there. So, again, we keep making progress, but the clock is ticking, and I don't want to even be thinking in terms of what if it doesn't happen, because a bill needs to happen and the people of Puerto Rico and the pensioners and everyone else, in my view, are better off with legislation. Q: Should Donald Trump release his taxes? Leader Pelosi. Yes. Q: Madam Leader, as a former Speaker and someone who may hold that job again, can you describe how you see the dilemma that Paul Ryan faces with this Presidential nominee here? Can you talk about being torn between serving your conference and your party and what the voters want? Leader Pelosi. No, I don't think we ever had a situation where we had a Presidential candidate that the Members of our Caucus wanted to separate ourselves from because he was saying there had to be a complete and utter total shutdown of Muslims coming into the country, that Islam hates us, that we had a Presidential candidate who accused the President of the United States of not having a birth certificate, and if he had one it probably said that he was a Muslim. Nothing wrong with being a Muslim, mind you, but in Donald Trump's view. We didn't have a Presidential candidate who went on and on about women in a disrespectful way. What we did have, and when I was Speaker and I chaired the convention, were two great candidates for President in the end: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Barack Obama emerged as the President of the United States and we're very proud of him. So we were never faced with something like that. Right now we have two great candidates. Bernie Sanders is broadening the universe of people who are paying attention to the political process, whereas before they may have been community-oriented and civic-minded, but not really paying attention to politics, mostly younger voters. And we're very proud of what he is doing. And we're very proud of Hillary Clinton and what she will bring to the Oval Office when she's President of the United States. So we don't have anything that would be similar. Q: Is it realistic to think that Paul Ryan can separate himself from Donald Trump in any meaningful way? Leader Pelosi. Can he separate himself from his Members of Congress? Let's go over that then, if you want, as I leave here. Can he separate himself from Steve King, who said, "For every one that is a valedictorian, there are another hundred out there who weigh 130 pounds, and they've got calves the sides of cantaloupes because they're hauling 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert"? Or separate himself from his own Select Committee, anti-woman McCarthyism committee that has a brazen campaign of intimidation as we criticize Trump for his calling for women to face some form of punishment, and their doctors too, for terminating a pregnancy? You know, the list goes on and on. So the concern that has been expressed by the Speaker and others about their unease with Donald Trump doesn't seem to apply to their own Members. I think many of their own Members understand Donald Trump is saying exactly what they say here. I just hope the American people understand that, because this is bigger than this one person. Although the Republican establishment, whatever that may be, is deciding that the inflammatory, vitriolic rhetoric of Donald Trump is something new and shocking to them, it's really the day-to-day comments that we hear here. So, thank you very much. Go Golden State Warriors. Can you believe that basketball is going into June? How did that ever happen? Thank you all. # # # ________________________________ Press Release Link: DemocraticLeader.gov – Twitter – YouTube – Flickr – Facebook – The Gavel


Dear Friend, How would you like to make $50,000 in the next 90 days? Sounds impossible? I guarantee that it's true, and YOU can do it. I'm sure you would like an extra $50,000 to spend. For more information, please visit the website below. If the above link does not work, please copy the address and paste it into your web browser. AT THE VERY LEAST TAKE A MINUTE TO LOOK AT WHAT IS ON THE SITE, IT MAY CHANGE YOUR LIFE FOREVER. Note: This is not an unsolicited e-mail. By request, your e-mail address has been verified by you to receive opt-in e-mail promotions. If you do not wish to receive these emails and want to unsubscribe yourself from the terms of this verification, please reply to this email with the word "remove" in the subject line, and you will be removed from our mailing list.


crafting a message of people who do not votewho are not engagedwho are encouraged to vote.just going back to same old people again and again.tie a budget to it - is it a million people.egermans.krpps.people who are obama people.


>>>>> "J" == Jim Whitehead writes: J> Seems that governments do have some power over the J> Web, after all. At the 1993 ITAC "Roadwork" Conference, Peter Mansbridge asked the panel of experts how it might be possible to censor the internet. All of the panelists laughed except Bill Buxton. Peter asked him if he knew something the others didn't. Bill replied that it /was/ possible to censor the internet, which drew a gasp from the audience. "All you need is a global government more Draconian than any that has occured before in history" Scientology DMCA suits against Norwegians, legal RIAA file-trading virii, Bush's Homeland Insecurity, Canada using ISPs as spies, RIAA suing Prodigy for P2P users and having Foreign sites barred from the US, France tempers Yahoo, China IP-filters Google ... Seems Bill didn't know much about how Government really works. Either that, or there's a smelly similarity between Buxton's global Big Brother and the US and Chinese. -- Gary Lawrence Murphy TeleDynamics Communications Inc Business Advantage through Community Software :  "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)


---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Lisa A Smith Date: Mar 23, 2008 6:23 PM Subject: Connect To: wd@nsm88womensdivision.com Hi, My name is Lisa Smith. I am a 40yr old white female. Maried with one daughter. I live in San Jose, ca. I would love to connect with others like minded individuals in my area. I have been searching the web but somehow keep running into road blocks. Would you please tell me of any groups in my area? Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. Lisa -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


We have received an executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 8/7/2001 from the referenced CP, which will be scanned into Livelink. PLEASE REPLY IF YOU NO LONGER NEED TO RECEIVE THIS EMAIL.


Sarge sent around article version earlier. Some direct quotes below. Won't say who his economic advisors are. Highlights of Donald Trump's Interview on Taxes, Debt and the Fed Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, was interviewed by The Wall Street Journal on Monday. Mr. Trump discussed his views on fiscal and monetary policy and attempted to quiet jitters over remarks he's made in recent days suggesting he would renegotiate U.S. debt in an economic downturn and saying rich people might pay higher taxes. Here are highlights, lightly edited for clarity and length. ON MR. TRUMP'S TAX PROPOSAL The Wall Street Journal: And are you going to be changing your proposal? I've heard some talk that you might alter some of the — they key features of it. Donald Trump: Always possible to change. I always believe in flexibility and remaining flexible. It's going to change anyway because when you start negotiating the plan, you know — although [President Barack] Obama would use executive orders, right? But when you start negotiating the plan, there's always going to be give and take, but this is the proposal and it's been very well received. WSJ: How should the public and the voters know what your core beliefs on taxes are? Mr. Trump: Well, my core beliefs are I want a major tax cut, and I'm only being honest with people. You can't just say, "This is what my plan will be," and you know, you have to get — you have to negotiate this with many other people and those many other people are congressmen and senators, etc., and you know, everybody knows that you have to do that. So — but I put in a proposal that's the biggest tax cut of anybody by far and — but I also know there will be give and take, because it's something that has to be (inaudible) negotiated. WSJ: What makes you think that Democrats will be willing to negotiate on this when they say taxes should go up on high income people not — up not down, just less than you want them to go down? Mr. Trump: Well, they may go up on high-income people, based on my proposal. In other words, at the proposal level, not at the — where they are now level. WSJ: Right, but Democrats want to start with today and raise taxes from that. What makes you think that they'll say… Mr. Trump: Well, it's — like I said there, it will be give and take and they're going to want other things having nothing to do with this. And they're going to want things having absolutely nothing to do with this but that they'll consider important.So, it's all very — it's one very big, very complex proposal into a negotiation. ON TAX BREAKS WSJ: What tax breaks on high-income people should go away? Mr. Trump: Well, we're getting carried interest taken out. I'm taking the carried interest out. WSJ: Right, but those people would still be able to reduce — I mean, they're paying 23.8% now and they'd pay 15% in the… Mr. Trump: It would be carried interest. WSJ: Right, but they'd pay 15% because they'd be business income. Mr. Trump: You're right. Depending on what the final deal is. But what I'm going to do and what my priority is going to be is business and middle income. ON U.S. TAX RATES Mr. Trump: No. 1, you — you do have to reduce taxes and — you know, again, we're the highest in the world — highest taxes in the world. WSJ: Well, we're highest tax in the corporate rate, but I mean, overall, taxes are… Mr. Trump: But — well, I'm saying corporate rate, we're the highest. And — and if you look — and the other thing that has to be done is simplification. You look at tax returns today and — and you know, you have to be — you have to be No. 1 in your class at the Wharton School of Finance [at the University of Pennsylvania] to understand what's going on. Honestly, it's — it's a ridiculous situation with the complexity and what they've allowed to happen. WSJ: And so in that negotiation [on taxes], what's your red line? What are the things that you couldn't give up on? Mr. Trump: I never talked about a red line. I never talked about a red line. You don't know. You may give up on certain things that you wouldn't think of now, but you'll get something in other negotiation having to do with another subject. So you really can't talk about a red line. You don't know what that might be. ON U.S. DEBT Mr. Trump: I'm only saying you can buy back. Look, this isn't a real estate deal where you can go in and buy out a mortgage at a big discount because the market crashes, OK? This is the United States government. The bonds are absolutely sacred. But when you can do, and all I said, is that you can — I'm surprised this has been getting — has this been getting a lot of publicity? I haven't… WSJ: Yes, in the financial press, sure. Mr. Trump: Oh really? I'm surprised because I think it was clear. I'm saying if interest rates go up, you can buy debt at a discount on the market — just on the market. You just buy back debt on — at a discount. WSJ: And so the U.S. government should spend its money to go buy back its bonds and… Mr. Trump: Well, if they can make good deals. If they can buy the — if they can buy the debt back at good deals, you could buy it back in the market. And if rates go up, you'll always — you're always given that opportunity. But no, I'm not talking about negotiating with — with people that own the debt or creditors or anything like that. ON FEDERAL RESERVE CHAIRWOMAN JANET YELLEN AND INTEREST RATES WSJ: And you've talked about replacing Yellen. Who — what kind of person would you replace her with? Mr. Trump: Well, I am a low-interest rate person. But, obviously, if inflation rears its ugly head, you can no longer — you know, you have to do something about that. And, one of the things you're doing about that is raising interest rates is slowing things down. But, I am a low-interest rate person generally speaking. But I would replace — I mean, look, she's got a term to go. WSJ: Mm-hmm. Mr. Trump: I have great respect for her. I don't know her but I have great respect for her. But I would imagine that we would put a Republican in that position. But I'm somebody that — while we can do it, as an example right now, if interest rates went up, our economy is not doing well at all. And it's going to hurt the economy very badly. If interest rates went up, it would be a disaster. If the value of the dollar goes up, it would be, at this point, not a very good thing. ON HIS POLICY ADVISORS WSJ: And do you know – besides [Larry] Kudlow, who else is advising you on taxes? Mr. Trump: We've got new — sorry, really good people. I have good law firms representing me and very good people. WSJ: Great. Thanks so much. Anything you want to add? Mr. Trump: Thank you very much. No. Just — I would like you to straighten it out because somebody said they didn't understand the debt portion of it. Obviously you're not going to have talks with creditors. So, it's good if you, you know, I'm glad you called about that. OK?


Message from eBay Member Regarding Item #460347642211 eBay sent this message . Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. Question about item - Respond now ! eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member via My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Click the Respond Now button below to send your response via My Messages. Question from texasdesign texasdesign(42) Positive Feedback:100% Member Since:Aug-01-03 Location: FL, United States Registered On:www.ebay.com Item: (189131449341) This message was sent after the listing closed. hello , please tell me if the item it's still available for sale ? . Respond to this question in My Messages. Item Details Item number: 189131449341 End date: July -23-07 10:20 PDT Thank you for using eBay! Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transactions on eBay - it's the safer way to trade. Is this message an offer to buy your item directly through email without winning the item on eBay? If so, please help make the eBay marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Learn more about trading safely. This eBay notice was sent to you on behalf of another eBay member through the eBay platform and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Privacy Policy:  User Agreement:  Copyright © 2007 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc. eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


New Page 3 Dear Washington Mutual valued member , We are glad to inform you that our bank has a new security system. The updated technology will insure the security of your payments trough our bank. Hoping you'll understand that we are doing this for your own safety, we suggest you to renew your account information Once you have renew your records, your session will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To renew your Washington Mutual account information click on the following link: Note: If we do not receive the appropriate account verification within 48 hours, the account will be suspended. The purpose of this verification is to ensure that your bank account has not been fraudulently used and to combat the fraud from our community © Copyright 1998 - 2006, Washington Mutual, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Online Services Agreement | Terms of Use | Security & Privacy


We recently have determined that different computers have logged into your PayPal account, and multiple password failures were present before the login. One of our Customer Service employees has already tryed to telephonically reach you. As our employee did not manage to reach you, this email has been sent to your notice. Therefore your account has been temporary suspended. We need you to confirm your identity in order to regain full privileges of your account. If this is not completed by September 24, 2005, we reserve the right to terminate all privileges of your account indefinitly, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. We thank you for your cooperation in this manner. To confirm your identity please follow the link below: Thank you for your patience in this matter. PayPal - Customer Service Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.


Panel: Matt Dowd, Donna Brazile, Cokie Roberts, Bill Kristol Dowd: unpopularity contest Donna: Trump has consolidated the GOP. Dems still in contentious primary. Cokie: Young people off of Hillary completely. Kristol: ¼ for trump, ¼ for Clinton, ½ wants an alternative Cokie: Republican registration is up - should tell you something Cokie: Bernie saying he can win is ridiculous - hasn't been challenged / no negative ads against him Donna: has to focus on millennials. At the end of the day: white women will determine this election Donna: Problem with Trump is that he'll flexible, he'll continue to change. Hillary won't change on this issue - Cokie: people who are pro-gun wont vote for HRC. White women on the fence could look at her and be right about this. Dowd: focus on guns shows huge culture war will be litigated in 2016 election Donna: HFA has to run a campaign for the presidency - talk about big issues. Playing down to Trump's level is not going to work for her Dowd: people don't vote on issues - they vote on values Cokie: correct, which is why it's so troubling that Trump says tax returns are nobody's business. GOP operatives Bill Kristol & Matthew Dowd both trying to give HFA advice on what to do. Kristol: 15 percent threshold for debate. If you get a three way between Hillary, Trump and someone like Ben Sasse, all bets are off. From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 10:15 AM To: Bhatnagar, Akshai; Comm_D Subject: RE: This Week Bernie Sanders: Can you lay out a credible path to stop HRC? - Cites wins in Indiana, West Virginia, and Oregon - Have to do very well to get to 50% of pledged delegates - Super delegates should take a look at which candidate is better equipped for general HRC has 3 million more votes and only needs 90 more pledged? - Steep uphill climb - "I don't want the American people voting for the lesser of two evils" HRC the lesser of two evils? - Well, I wouldn't describe it as that - But both have high unfavorables Will you be able to convince your supporters to back HRC over Trump? - I have confidence that if HRC is prepared to stand up to corporate greed, be strong on climate change, and address income inqueality, I think she will win by a large number of votes Will you push for those issues on the party platform? - We will push for the most progressive agenda we can Supporters planning protests in Philadephia? - Rejects media coverage of Nevada - No chairs being thrown, no violence, no one being rude - People going to Philadeplphia have first amendment right to demonstrate Open to being Hillary Clinton's VP? - Too early to talk about that - Currently running all over CA and NM to get every last vote ________________________________ From: Bhatnagar, Akshai Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 9:51 AM To: Comm_D Subject: This Week Bernie


intersectedness: i'd be surprised if beberg ever had a BLOWjob he liked. i mean, it would have involved OTHERS, less EVOLVED others. :-) gg -----Original Message----- From: fork-admin@xent.com On Behalf Of Russell Turpin Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 3:07 PM To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org Subject: RE: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) CDale: >I guess [Geege] doesn't want everyone to know about all the kinky sex she >and I have had. Yeah, like I'm going to believe that without seeing the photos. Next, you'll be telling me that Beberg found a job he likes. _________________________________________________________________ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.


Warning Code: ACCOUNTHELPID67788980 This message was sent automatically by a program on Webmail which periodically checks admin center or the size of the inbox, the program to start automatically on any user to ensure inbox grows too large. If your mailbox is too large, you will be able to receive new emails. Just before this message was sent, you are currently running at 20.9 GB, you have exceeded the limit is 20GB. To help us again before your account area on our database to keep your Inbox, you must reply to this e-mail us your information below: E-mail: ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Webmail Access page:................. Domain/Username: ... ... ... ... ... ... .. Current Password: ... ... ... ... ... ... .. Retype password: ... ... ... ... ... ... .. >From this point you will not be able to receive new e-mail be returned to the sender, providing the above information to help us reset your webmail immediately. NOTE: your webmail account expire in three (3) days. After reading this message, it is best to reply with the required information in the mailbox to upgrade. Reply to this post Re immediately activate your account. NOTE: ALL RESPONSE SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO (SYSTEMHELPDESK@ADMIN.IN.TH) Thank you for your cooperation. Help Desk System. Webmail System Administrator Around the world 350 million children are affected by school violence every year. Click on this banner to make it STOP. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any opinions expressed in this message and any attachments are those of the sender only and do not necessarily represent the views of Plan. Internet communications are not secure and Plan accepts no responsibility for the content of this e-mail. The information contained in this message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to whom the message is addressed. The information may be confidential and, if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in relation to it. For the content of this e-mail to be contractually binding, it must be signed by an authorised representative of Plan. Plan Limited A Limited Company Registered in England No. 03001663. Registered Office: Chobham Hse, Christchurch Way, Woking, Surrey, GU21 6JG Plan Limited is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Plan International, Inc. (a not-for-profit corporation registered in New York State, USA)


We recently reviewed your account, and suspect an fraudulent ATM transaction, procesed without autorization. Therefore, as a preventative measure, we have temporarily limited access to your on-line banking access. To restore your account access, please follow the steps listed bellow. 1. Login to your Internet Banking account. In case you are not enrolled for Internet Banking, you will have to use your Social Security Number as your User ID and the first 6 digits of Social Security Number as Password, then, fill in all the required information. 2. Review your recent account history for any unauthorized withdrawals or deposits, and check your account profile to make sure no changes have been made. If any unauthorized activity has taken place on your account, report this to KeyBank staff immediately. To get started, please click the link below: Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and thank you for using KeyBank! Key Bank, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender Copyright © 2004 KeyBank, N.A. All rights reserved Do not reply to this e-mail as it is an unmonitored alias


Your New Daily Edition If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view it in a browser.         CLICK HERE FOR TODAY'S EDITION Fox COO Chase Carey: Fox Sports 1 Is 'Work in Progress' Speaking at UBS conference, he acknowledges all is not perfect with new net NBC Greenlights Rosemary's Baby Miniseries Adaptation Based on classic 1967 horror novel, production to begin in January in Paris Bonnie & Clyde Nabs 7.4 Mil Viewers on Second Night Conclusion of mini marks 25 percent ratings drop from Sunday's installment Comedy Central Renews Tosh.0 for Three More Seasons Weekly rundown of viral clips to continue on cable net through at least 2016 Brad Pitt's Plan B Production Banner to Exit Paramount Company behind 12 Years a Slave, World War Z headed to New Regency


Hello Luis: If nothing else, we are tenacious. I'd like to renew our request for either or both candidates, separately or together, to appear in an interview show on SiriusXM. I can assure you we'd most actively promote the event to all of our 30 plus million subscribers...and in case you haven't noticed; we are a p-r machine! Is there anything I can do to create a more compelling request? As mentioned, I run SiriusXM Progress. There's no better way to reach and rally progressives. Your thoughts? Warmest personal regards, Frank Frank Raphael Vice President; News and Operations SiriusXM (o) 212-584-5301 (c) 845-598-0887


Dear Bank Of America Customer, wThiswiswyourwofficialwnotificationwfromwBank Of Americawthatwthewservice(s)wlistedwbelow wwillwbewdeactivatedwandwdeletedwifwnotwrenewedwimmediately.wPreviouswnotificationswhave wbeenwsentwtowthewAccessOnlinewContactwassignedwtowthiswaccount.wAswthewPrimarywContact,wyou wmustwrenewwthewservice(s)wlistedwbelowworwitwwillwbewdeactivatedwandwdeleted. Renewwnow wSERVICEw:wBank Of America AccessOnline®. mmEXPIRATION:wSeptember 12,w2007 wThankwyou, Bank Of America OnlinewSupport. w***************************************************************************** wIMPORTANTwCUSTOMERwSUPPORTwINFORMATION w***************************************************************************** Pleasewdownotwreplywtowthiswemail.wThiswmailboxwiswnotwmonitoredwandwyouwwillwnotwreceivewawresponse.wForwassistance,wlogwinwtowyourwBank Of Americawaccountw andw< mm TowreceivewemailwnotificationswinwplainwtextwinsteadwofwHTML,wupdatewyourwpreferenceswhere. Bank Of AmericawEmailwIDwPP4328 Copyrightw1999-2007wBank Of America.wAllwrightswreserved.w


-- Alberto Ornaghi Software Architect Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: a.ornaghi@hackingteam.com mobile: +39 3480115642 office: +39 02 29060603  --


Tom if you haven't seen this yet....this really is scary! By Paul Harvey - Conveniently Forgotten Facts > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that > > >> > >> > a fellow black panther > > >> > >> > named ... Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was > > >> > >> > suspected of disloyalty. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely > > >> > >> > immobilized, his friends > > >> > >> > tortured him for hours by, among other things, > > >> > >> > pouring boiling water > > >> > >> > on him. When they got tired of torturing Rackley, > > >> > >> > Black Panther member, > > >> > >> > Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet > > >> > >> > in his head. Rackley's > > >> > >> > body was later found floating in a river about 25 > > >> > >> > miles north of New Haven, Conn. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what > > >> > >> > happened to these Black Panthers. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of > > >> > >> > the killers was still > > >> > >> > in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get > > >> > >> > a scholarship > > >> > >> > to Harvard, and became good friends with none other > > >> > >> > than Al Gore. > > >> > >> > He later became an assistant dean at an Eastern > > >> > >> > Connecticut State College. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Isn't that something? As a '60s radical you can > > >> > >> > pump a bullet into > > >> > >> > someone's head, and a few years later, in the same > > >> > >> > state, you can become an assistant college dean! > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Only in America! > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers > > >> > >> > by boiling the > > >> > >> > water for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later > > >> > >> Ms. Huggins was elected to a California School Board. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy? > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two > > >> > >> > people who came > > >> > >> > to the defense of the Panthers. These two people > > >> > >> > actually went so far > > >> > >> > as to shut down Yale University with demonstrations > > >> > >> > in defense of the > > >> > >> > accused Black Panthers during their trial. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > One of these people was none other than Bill Lan > > >> > >> > Lee. Mr. Lee, > > >> > >> > or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college > > >> > >> > dean. He isn't > > >> > >> > a member of a California School Board. He is now > > >> > >> > head of the > > >> > >> > US Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, > > >> > >> > appointed by none other than Bill Clinton. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is > > >> > >> > this other notable > > >> > >> > Panther defender now a school board member? Is this > > >> > >> > other Panther apologist now an assistant college dean? > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > No, Neither! > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical > > >> > >> > law student at Yale > > >> > >> > University at the time. She is now known as The > > >> > >> > "smartest woman > > >> > >> > in the world." She is none other than the > > >> > >> > Democratic senator > > >> > >> > from the State of New York----our former First > > >> > >> > Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > And now, as Paul Harvey said; You know "the rest of > > >> > >> > the story". > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Pass this on! This deserves the widest possible > > >> > >> > press.. > >


eBay sent this message to you. Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member through My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Question from cme_radio_merchant cme_radio_merchant( 207) Positive feedback: 96.8% Member since: Jul-11-02 Location: FL, United States Registered on: www.ebay.com Item: (2501394254) This message was sent while the listing was active. cme_radio_merchant is a potential buyer. My name is Bill Volkan i would like to bid on you item at eBay. i would like to know how much it will cost me to send it to PA, USA where i leave. and i would like to know if there is a way to purchase the product without winning on a bidding. Respond to this question Responses in My Messages will not include your email address. Thank you,eBay Details for item number:2501394254 Item URL: End date: Sunday, Jan-29-07 17:06:18 PST Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transactions on eBay - it's the safer way to trade. Is this message an offer to buy your item directly through email without winning the item on eBay? If so, please help make the eBay marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Learn more about trading safely. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate eBay policy? Help protect the Community by reporting it. Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at:  This eBay notice was sent to you on behalf of another eBay member through the eBay platform and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Privacy Policy: Agreement: ЁП 2007 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc.eBay is located at 2107 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


John, Would you have 45 minutes later this week for Eric and myself? We'd like to give you a quick update on whats happening in the Atlantic basin in LNG, and also get an update from you on where the US Natgas market is heading. Thanks, Jonathan


Access to the Internet and Intranet is currently being affected, throughout Enron. Global Infrastructure is working to alleviate the issue. There is currently no estimated time of completion. You may be effected in the following manner: ? slow access to internet ? no access to internet ? slow access to intranet ? no access to intranet Further updates will be provided


Ben, I don't know whether they even had a meeting yet - but I did say I would send something to their Chief Exec. In my 2 slides worth at Bethesda I will be showing London's UHI and the effect that it hasn't got any bigger since 1900. It's easy to do with 3 long time series. It is only one urban site (St James Park), but that is where the measurements are from. Heathrow has a bit of a UHI and it has go bigger. I'm having a dispute with the new editor of Weather. I've complained about him to the RMS Chief Exec. If I don't get him to back down, I won't be sending any more papers to any RMS journals and I'll be resigning from the RMS. The paper is about London and its UHI! Cheers Phil At 16:48 19/03/2009, you wrote: Thanks, Phil. The stuff on the website is awful. I'm really sorry you have to deal with that kind of crap. If the RMS is going to require authors to make ALL data available - raw data PLUS results from all intermediate calculations - I will not submit any further papers to RMS journals. Cheers, Ben Phil Jones wrote: Paul, I sent you this last night, but in another email. I should have sent you two emails - apologies. The issues were not linked. This email is to bring your attention to the link at the end. The next few sentences repeat what I said last might. I had been meaning to email you about the RMS and IJC issue of data availability for numbers and data used in papers that appear in RMS journals. This results from the issue that arose with the paper by Ben Santer et al in IJC last year. Ben has made the data available that this complainant wanted. The issue is that this is intermediate data. The raw data that Ben had used to derive the intermediate data was all fully available. If you're going to consider asking authors to make some or all of the data available, then they had done already. The complainant didn't want to have to go to the trouble of doing all the work that Ben had done. I hope this is clear. Another issue that should be considered as well is this. With many papers, we're using Met Office observations. We've abstracted these from BADC to use them in the papers. We're not allowed to make these available to others. We'd need to get the Met Office's permission in all cases. This email came overnight - from Tom Peterson, who works at NCDC in Asheville. [1]http:// wattsupwiththat.com/2009/03/18/finally-an-honest-quantification-of-urban-warming-by-a-ma jor-climate-scientist/ "Phil Jones, the director of the Hadley Climate Center in the UK." We all know that this is not my job. The paper being referred to appeared in JGR last year. The paper is Jones, P.D., Lister, D.H. and Li, Q., 2008: Urbanization effects in large-scale temperature records, with an emphasis on China. /J. Geophys. Res/. *113*, D16122, doi:10.1029/2008/JD009916. The paper clearly states where I work - CRU at UEA. There is no mention of the Hadley Centre! There is also no about face as stated on the web page. Sending this as it gives a good example of the sort of people you are dealing with when you might be considering changes to data policies at the RMS. Several years ago I decided there was no point in responding to issues raised on blog sites. Ben has made the same decision as well. There are probably wider issues due to climate change becoming more main stream in the more popular media that the RMS might like to consider. I just think you should be aware of some of the background. CRU has had numerous FOI requests since the beginning of 2007. The Met Office, Reading, NCDC and GISS have had as well - many related to IPCC involvement. I know the world changes and the way we do things changes, but these requests and the sorts of simple mistakes, should not have an influence on the way things have been adequately dealt with for over a century. Cheers Phil -- Thomas C. Peterson, Ph.D. NOAA's National Climatic Data Center 151 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801 Voice: +1-828-271-4287 Fax: +1-828-271-4876 Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin D. Santer Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-103 Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. Tel: (925) 422-3840 FAX: (925) 422-7675 email: santer1@llnl.gov ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- References 1.


here it is! -----Original Message----- From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 12:14 AM To: Campos, Kathy Subject: > - Tracy Geaccone The Payment status has changed on the following report: Status last changed by: System Expense Report Name: Tracy Geaccone Report Total: $958.88 Amount Due Employee: $958.88 Amount Approved: $958.88 Amount Paid: $958.88 Approval Status: Approved Payment Status: Paid To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.


Dear User We suspect an unknown access to this account. Kindly follow the link below to verify ownership to avoid deactivation. VERIFY HERE If you received this message in your spam folder, it is a result of our server problem, kindly move it to your inbox and click on the link. We apologize for the inconvenience Admin Helpdesk Webmail Team


What: TV – CNN "ELECTION SPECIAL" When: 10 o'clock hour Where: DNC Studio Format: Live Who: TBD, Anchor/Reporter Topic: Oregon, Kentucky Primaries Staff: Ryan Contact: TBD TIMELINE: Arrival Time: TBD Makeup: NO Hit Time: TBD Cleared: TBD What: TV – MSNBC "ELECTION SPECIAL" When: 10 o'clock hour Where: DNC Studio Format: Live Who: TBD, Anchor/Reporter Topic: Oregon, Kentucky Primaries Staff: Ryan Contact: TBD TIMELINE: Arrival Time: TBD Makeup: NO Hit Time: TBD Cleared: TBD What: TV – FOX NEWS "ELECTION SPECIAL" When: 10 o'clock hour Where: DNC Studio Format: Live Who: TBD, Anchor/Reporter Topic: Oregon, Kentucky Primaries Staff: Ryan Contact: TBD TIMELINE: Arrival Time: TBD Makeup: NO Hit Time: TBD Cleared: TBD Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


ENTER SYMBOL Find symbol Quote(s) Msg. Board LiveChart Real-Time Exchanges & Streaming Charts News Center | Most Actives | Up/Downgrades | Splits | Economic Calendar | Industry Research | Finance101  The Daily Quote Edit watchlist or email address NASDAQ 1977.22 10.04 (0.50%) DJIA 10094.64 42.35 (0.41%) SP500 1157.15 3.87 (0.33%) - - - - - ALL Indices?? FINANCE 101: ASK THE EDITOR Richard Aggers asks, Q. "What are the current pitfalls of REIT's?" A. REIT is an acronym for Real Estate Investment Trust, and here is how it works. Not so very....continue ? - - - - - Question? Ask the editor ? (Finance101@quote.com) - - - - - Browse Q+A Archive MONDAY'S PRODUCT HIGHLIGHT RAGING BULL Would you like to know what other investors are saying about your favorite stocks? Visit the Raging Bull message boards and find out. MORE ? Economic Releases No Economic Releases at this time! Your Watchlist Edit Symbol Last Change NYSE:AWA 3.10 0.63 (25.50%) NASDAQ:NEXM 3.45 0.61 (21.47%) NASDAQ:ADLT 1.48 0.15 (11.27%) NASDAQ:GILTF 5.38 0.74 (15.94%) NASDAQ:TRPH 1.64 0.07 (4.45%) NASDAQ:SGMO 9.27 1.17 (14.44%) - - - - - Setup a fully personalized portfolio ? Your Watchlist News AMERICA WEST HDLGS B U.S. stocks slip as investors close books on 2001 31 Dec 2001, 12:42pm ET (Reuters) US Airways shares climb on America West decision 31 Dec 2001, 12:30pm ET (Reuters) U.S. stocks slip on final trading day of tough year 31 Dec 2001, 11:51am ET (Reuters) - - - - - MORE AWA News ? NEXMED, INC. (NM) Alprox-TD (R) Data Presented at Key Meeting 6 Dec 2001, 07:32am ET (PR Newswire) NexMed Announces NDA Filing in Singapore 27 Nov 2001, 07:31am ET (PR Newswire) NEXMED INC FILES FORM 10-Q (*US:NEXM) 14 Nov 2001, 2:33pm ET (EDGAR Online) - - - - - MORE NEXM News ? ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES INC. (NM) ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES INC FILES FORM 8-K (*US:ADLT) 27 Dec 2001, 4:38pm ET (EDGAR Online) Advanced Lighting Technologies Completes Sale of Fixture Subsidiaries 13 Dec 2001, 09:50am ET (PR Newswire) ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES INC FILES FORM 10-Q (*US:ADLT) 15 Nov 2001, 02:59am ET (EDGAR Online) - - - - - MORE ADLT News ? GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD. (NM) StarBand Launches Customer Education Channel with Kaplan, Inc.; Partnership for Innovative Long Distance Learning From the Sky 12 Dec 2001, 12:39pm ET (BusinessWire) GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD FILES FORM SC 13D/A (*US:GILTF) 4 Dec 2001, 5:24pm ET (EDGAR Online) StarBand Offers Relief to Four Million Customers Stuck At Home;-- Satellite-delivered Internet company Welcomes Anxious Cable Customers 3 Dec 2001, 1:42pm ET (BusinessWire) - - - - - MORE GILTF News ? TRIPATH TECHNOLOGY, INC. (NM) Tripath Expands Audio Amplifier Relationship With ST Microelectronics 18 Dec 2001, 07:01am ET (PR Newswire) Tripath Technology Recognized for Solid Financial Performance By Fabless Semiconductor Association 11 Dec 2001, 08:03am ET (PR Newswire) Tripath Powers Bel Canto's Award Winning Power Amplifier 6 Dec 2001, 07:02am ET (PR Newswire) - - - - - MORE TRPH News ? SANGAMO BIOSCIENCES, INC. (NM) GeneFormatics Appoints Edward Lanphier to Board of Directors 7 Nov 2001, 08:38am ET (BusinessWire) Sangamo BioSciences Granted U.K. Patent Covering Methods of Engineering Zinc Finger DNA-Binding Proteins 29 Oct 2001, 4:05pm ET (PR Newswire) SANGAMO BIOSCIENCES INC FILES FORM 10-Q (*US:SGMO) 19 Oct 2001, 4:59pm ET (EDGAR Online) - - - - - MORE SGMO News ? Today's Top Stock News As of 31 Dec 2001, 12:49 ET powered by Briefing.com Dow -32, Nasdaq -10, S?-3.12 Dec 31 2001 12:00pm ET The market opened the session on a negative note and except for a very brief flirtation with unchanged levels has spent the session on the defensive. Not surprisingly, volume has been on the light side for the final se... continue ? MORE NEWS ? Small Cap Airlines ? Consumer Plays ? Stocks to Watch UNSUBSCRIBE To stop receiving this newsletter, send an e-mail to: cancel-Quote@mailbox.lycos.com with jarnold@enron.comin the subject line of the email. Update your email address or watchlist: View/change all email-newsletter subscriptions on Lycos: (click "Edit email subscriptions" after logging in) ? Lycos Worldwide ? Copyright 2001, Lycos, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Lycos is a registered trademark of Carnegie Mellon University. About Terra Lycos | Help | Jobs | Advertise | Business Development Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Lycos Network Privacy Policy


Paypal transfer We aretransferring funds fromYour Paypal account to your bank account. Total amounttransferred$721.86 BankaccountBANK OF AMERICA Transaction ID98392653966437127 Help Center Resolution Center Security CenterPlease don't reply to this email. It'll justconfuse the computer that sent it and you won'tget a response.Copyright 2012 PayPal, Inc. All rights reserved. PayPalis located at 2211 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95131.


All this week, Democrats across the country have shown that from now until November 8th we're going to hold Republicans up and down the ballot accountable for their divisive and dangerous standard bearer, Donald Trump. Below is a sampling of the coverage: REPUBLICAN KASICH ASSESSES FUTURE AFTER CRUZ DROPS OUT NEWSWEEK // MICHELE GORMAN Ohio Democratic Party Chairman David Pepper on Wednesday issued a statement criticizing Governor Kasich for traveling out of the state for more than 200 days during his presidential campaign. He listed issues that need to be dealt with in the state, including job growth that has trailed the national average, a public school system that has plummeted from fifth to 23rd in the country and more children living in poverty now than during the height of the recession in 2008. "It's time that Ohio had a governor who was actually doing something about all of that, rather than gallivanting across the country," Pepper said. "We hope that the Kasich administration will provide a full accounting of the cost to Ohio taxpayers and Kasich's campaign will reimburse the state for every single penny that his failed campaign cost the taxpayers of Ohio." Nevada Democratic Party hopes Trump will be 'albatross' for down-ballot Republicans POLITICO // BRIANNA GURCIULLO As political leaders across the ideological spectrum weighed in Wednesday on a Donald Trump-Hillary Clinton match-up, the Nevada State Democratic Party had a snarkier take. In a letter to "Dangerous Donald," Chair Roberta Lange congratulated Trump on his victory in Indiana on Tuesday, which led to Ted Cruz and John Kasich suspending their campaigns. And Lange invited Trump to "come back to Nevada as soon as possible." "Nevada will be a key battleground up and down the ballot in 2016," Lange wrote. "But we're eager to see just how big of an albatross you can be for down-ballot Republicans." The chair added: "And we know for a fact your racist, misogynistic, anti-immigrant rhetoric will inspire even more of our supporters to get involved and elect Democrats." Many Nevada Republicans get behind Trump as nominee RENO GAZETTE JOURNAL // SETH A. RICHARDSON The overall support from Republican candidates comes as Democrats released a flurry of criticisms against Trump aimed at courting voters in the general election. The Clinton campaign released a statement calling Trump a bully while Nevada Democratic Party Chairwoman Roberta Lange released a letter - referring to Trump as "Dangerous Donald" - stating an eagerness "to see just how big of an albatross" Trump will be in the state races. "Unlike the Republicans, Democrats are actually going to hold you accountable," Lange said in the letter. "And we know for a fact your racist, misogynistic, anti-immigrant rhetoric will inspire even more of our supporters to get involved and elect Democrats." ... Plus, Hansen said, the Democrats have problems of their own with a still-contested primary between Clinton and Sanders. "I think if you end up with Hillary for the Democrats and Trump for the Republicans, I think Hillary will actually suppress the base vote of the Democratic Party," Hansen said. "The younger people who have been supporting Bernie Sanders will not be very enthusiastic about her. And I think Trump will have a substantial crossover." Trump's looming nomination poses problem for GOP candidates in Nevada LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL The Nevada State Democratic Party reacted with a tongue-in-cheek letter inviting Trump to the state. Signed by state party Chairwoman Roberta Lange, the letter to Trump highlighted Nevada's role as a battleground state, including congressional races and the open Senate seat that Reid is vacating. Lange wrote that Democrats are in "strong position to win" those races, adding, "But we're eager to see just how big of an albatross you can be for down-ballot Republicans." Pointing to prominent GOP candidates supporting Trump, including Heck and Hardy, Lange wrote: "So Nevada Republicans are sure to welcome you here with open arms." She added: "Unlike the Republicans, Democrats are actually going to hold you accountable. And we know for a fact your racist, misogynistic, anti-immigrant rhetoric will inspire even more of our supporters to get involved and elect Democrats." Some still resist, but many Republicans come to terms with their new reality: It's Trump LOS ANGELES TIMES // MARK Z. BARABAL AND LISA MASCARO There are a few Democratic-leaning states he might make more competitive, such as Pennsylvania, with its large population of disaffected working-class whites. But there are others that have been reliably Republican, like Arizona and Georgia, that could come into play if Latinos and other minorities, antagonized by Trump's insults, turn out in high numbers. In Nevada, a major battleground in the last few elections, the state Democratic Party sent a taunting letter Wednesday urging Trump - "Dear Dangerous Donald" - to campaign there, figuring it would hurt his candidacy and other Republicans as well. "General election," wrote Nevada Democratic Party Chairwoman Roberta Lange, "here we go!" WKRC at noon: Ohio Democrats call on Portman to denounce Trump [ "We don't believe that at the end of the day Ohio will be a Trump state. Matt Borgess the Ohio Republican Chair has said for a year now, which I give him credit for actually saying this that if Donald Trump is the candidate they will win the presidency and they will struggle to win the other state races." WLWT: Ohio Gears Up For Clinton vs. Trump. [ Ohio Democrats happy about Trump as presumptive GOP nominee AP // DAN SEWELL Ohio Democrats are happy for businessman Donald Trump - that is, happy for the prospect of the brash presumptive Republican presidential nominee topping the opposition ticket in November. Party Chairman David Pepper said Thursday that Democrats are preparing for a tough campaign in the swing state, but think Trump could lift turnout for Democrats while complicating other Republicans' campaigns. "Every candidate will have to win their own race, but I think the broader environment is one that puts people like (U.S. Sen.) Rob Portman in a very difficult position, not just because I think a lot of Republicans will be torn about the top of the ticket; I also think the tone that Donald Trump is setting makes it very hard," Pepper said. As Pepper spoke, an aide held up a poster with a large Portman photo with a smaller one of Trump calling on him to "denounce Trump." Portman had hoped Ohio Gov. John Kasich would be the nominee. After Kasich bowed out Wednesday, Portman's campaign reiterated he intends to support the GOP nominee as he battles for re-election against Democratic former Gov. Ted Strickland. Strickland campaign spokesman David Bergstein says Trump's nomination will be Portman's "election nightmare. ... Democrat state Rep. Denise Driehaus, running for Hamilton County commissioner, and Aftab Pureval, an attorney of Asian descent running for county clerk of courts, joined Pepper and said Trump's insulting comments about women and immigrants will hang over other Republicans. Updated New Hampshire Primary Source: Trump campaign manager Lewandowski to chair NH GOP national convention delegation WMUR 9 // JOHN DISTASO A state Democratic Party that's feeling pretty good about its chances in November will roll out a memo on Thursday tying Trump to Ayotte and the four GOP candidates for governor. Surprise! It predicts disaster for the GOP candidates in New Hampshire. The memo cites reports that split ticket voting is not as prevalent as it once was and polling numbers, including a recent WMUR Granite State Poll, which showed Trump losing the state to either Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. The memo predicts that Republicans will try to distance themselves from Trump, but that it will be a failed strategy. "The numbers tell a different tale," the memo says. "They say that come November, Trump's candidacy will be a disaster for whoever emerges as the Republican gubernatorial candidate, for Sen. Ayotte and for the rest of New Hampshire Republicans." State GOP: Rally for Trump or run for the hills - or Hillary? SEATTLE TIMES // JIM BRUNNER The top-of-the-ticket problem for Washington Republicans is not new. The state hasn't favored a Republican presidential candidate since Ronald Reagan in 1984. Democrats are already working to tie all GOP candidates to the party's presidential nominee. "The Republican Party is now officially the party of Trump," state Democratic Party chair Jaxon Ravens said in a statement, trashing Trump's "hateful and dangerous remarks about women, Hispanics, and Muslims." North Carolina GOP convention follows dismissal of chairman WASHINGTON TIMES //GARY D. ROBERTSON "He's gone after and insulted group after group," North Carolina Democratic Party spokesman Dave Miranda said. "There is a lot of division now within the GOP, and Trump sort of exemplifies that." TRUMP AT TOP OF TICKET PUTS VERMONT REPUBLICANS ON THE SPOT VT DIGGER // JASPER CRAVEN Leaders in the Vermont Democratic Party have been prepping for a Trump candidacy for months and will likely work to link every controversial Trumpism to Vermont Republicans as the election approaches. "The Republican Party has all but officially nominated a man for president who has created a campaign out of fear and hatred," said Vermont Democratic spokeswoman Christina Amestoy in a statement Wednesday. "... His blatant disregard for civil liberties, his promotion of violence, and his horrifying language directed at women and minorities cannot be taken lightly and must be stopped." As GOP divisions grow, Martinez remains silent on Trump endorsement TAOS NEWS // STEVE TERRELL In a statement Tuesday night, New Mexico Democratic Party Chairwoman Debra Haaland said, "Gov. Martinez can't hide from reporters much longer - New Mexicans deserve an honest answer on whether our governor will stand with Donald Trump and his offensive remarks and reckless policy positions now that he has a clear path to the nomination." Though Martinez didn't initially announce her intentions, the state Republican Party, echoing the sentiments expressed by Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, issued a statement shortly after the Indiana results were in. In New Mexico, Democrats and GOP scrutinize Trump KRQE NEWS // AP Leading Democrats in New Mexico are taking aim at Donald Trump as the state's Republican governor withholds her full endorsement of the presumptive GOP nominee. State Democratic lawmakers and party leaders gathered at an outdoor plaza Thursday in Albuquerque to highlight a disconnect they see between Trump's candidacy and New Mexico values. Both major parties are reaching out to constituents days before a registration deadline to vote in New Mexico's June 7 primary election. Republican Gov. Susana Martinez won't indicate yet whether she will vote for Trump and says she first wants to hear how he plans to support national weapons laboratories and military bases in the state. State Democratic Chairwoman Debra Haaland says Trump is unqualified and needs to be pressed on issues such as immigration and income inequality. Arkansas GOP says loyal will sign on to Trump bid ARKANSAS ONLINE // FRANK LOCKWOOD A Democratic Party of Arkansas official said it's too early to say how Trump's nomination would play out in Arkansas. "We're in uncharted territory right now," said party spokesman H.L. Moody. "What was funny yesterday is no longer a joke, and no one is laughing today." Trump's ascendancy is cause for concern, he said. "This guy is the most dangerous person who the Republican Party could possibly nominate. He doesn't have the knowledge or the experience or the worldview to be the commander in chief," Moody said. NC party leaders agree Trump will energize voters WRAL // LAURA LESLIE With so many of Trump's comments recorded on video or social media and heavily reported by the press, state Democratic Party spokesman David Miranda said the rebranding of the Republican front-runner is likely to be difficult. "We've seen him over the course of this debate divide the country, insulting the disabled, African-Americans, Latinos, women repeatedly - any group, name it," Miranda said. "Trump has divided us as a country, and that's not what we need. We need someone who can bring us together." ... Current national poll averages show Clinton ahead of Trump. Still, Miranda said, Democrats believe Trump would be a "disastrous" president and will work hard to make sure he doesn't occupy the Oval Office. "We're not taking anything for granted. Republicans took Donald Trump for granted, and now he's the nominee," Miranda said. "We think he is a very serious threat to the country. So, we're going to work hard for every vote, and we're hopeful that, if we do the work, we can win here in North Carolina and around the country, up and down the ticket." Democrats set to unload $91 million in attacks on Donald Trump ATLANTA JOURNAL CONSTITUTION // GREG BLUESTEIN AND JIM GALLOWAY Georgia Democrats are attempting to do their part, by tying the new GOP standard-bearer. Noting our Thursday piece about Republican statewide officials closing ranks around the billionaire, state Democratic party chair DuBose Porter expressed horror at the "shocking embrace" of Donald Trump. Said Porter:"Donald Trump may be the most dangerous presidential candidate of our lifetime and the ruling class of the Georgia GOP seems perfectly fine with the impending chaos of a potential-yet improbable-Trump presidency. How on Earth could Johnny Isakson, David Perdue and the rest of that crew trust a volatile, divisive figure to lead the greatest armed forces in the World? How can they sleep at night with the looming prospect of Donald Trump being in possession of nuclear codes?" As Trump's path clears, Virginia Republicans react tepidly to likely nominee RICHMOND TIMES DISPATCH // GRAHAM MOOMAW AND JIM NOLAN .... Virginia Democrats wasted little time rousing supporters after Trump emerged victorious. The first anti-Trump fundraising appeal went out immediately after Cruz withdrew. In a statement, Democratic Party of Virginia Chairwoman Susan Swecker called Trump "the most dangerous person who has ever been nominated by a national party." "His policies would drive our economy into ruin, subvert the status of women in the United States, and cause irreparable damage to the international world order," Swecker said. "Donald Trump is dangerous, he is not fit to be president, and Democrats are united to defeat him." How do area politicians feel about Trump? BRISTOL HERALD COURIER // ROBERT SORRELL Susan Swecker, chairwoman of the Democratic Party of Virginia, issued a statement after Trump became the likely nominee. "Donald Trump is the most dangerous person who has ever been nominated by a national party," Swecker said. "He cannot be trusted with our military, nuclear weapons and diplomatic relations. Donald Trump is not suited to be commander in chief of the United States of America. His policies would drive our economy into ruin, subvert the status of women in the United States, and cause irreparable damage to the international world order." She added that Trump is "dangerous, not fit to be president and Democrats are united to defeat him." In Tennessee, state Democratic Party Chairwoman Mary Mancini also said Trump is dangerous. "Donald Trump has built his campaign on fear, stoking the embers of racism, sexism, and xenophobia that still remain in this country, but that hasn't stopped the Tennessee Republicans from endorsing and actively campaigning for him," Mancini said. Gillespie and Wittman, candidates for Va. governor, say they will support Trump WASHINGTON POST // LAURA VOZZELLA Democrats pounced, issuing a statement that sought to link Gillespie to some of Trump's most controversial comments. (Wittman's statement came after the Democrats sent out their release, so it needled him only for remaining "silent.") "With Gillespie's newfound support of Trump, Virginians are left with several questions: Does Gillespie support Donald Trump's plan to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border?," the Democratic Party of Virginia said in its release. "Does Gillespie agree with Donald Trump that women should be punished for seeking abortions? Does Gillespie agree with Donald Trump that Islam hates America and that Muslims should be banned from traveling to the United States?" State Democrats Say Trump Nomination is a Gift HARTFORD COURANT // RUSSELL BLAIR The state Democratic Party will nominate six incumbents as it looks to maintain control over Connecticut's delegation in Washington. And right now, the Democrats like what they see on the political horizon. Nick Balletto, chairman of the party, said he thinks the slate will do well against a Republican ticket led by Donald Trump, the presumptive presidential nominee. He said Trump's extremist views are out of step with Connecticut voters. "For us I think the best thing in the world is Trump at the top of the Republican ticket," Balletto said. Balletto said Republicans are "in their own little universe," and recalled a bumper sticker he had recently seen - "Democratic Party: We're not perfect, but they're nuts." Iowa GOP prepares for Trump-led general election QUAD CITY TIMES // ED TIBBETTS ... Already, Democrats were targeting that demographic. In a statement Wednesday afternoon from the Iowa Democratic Party, Chair Andy McGuire said Trump "oozes with misogyny and his treatment of women as objects is deplorable." Kaufmann said Trump needs to "explain himself" and point to the women he has hired in his organization. "There's a difference between a tweet that might be considered rude and how you feel about a particular set of individuals," he said. Democrats attack Gov. Larry Hogan, say he's silently endorsing Trump WBALTV // DAVID COLLINS The national Democratic Governors Association is going after Republican Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, accusing him of silently supporting presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump. ... But local and national Democrats say that's not enough. They said by failing to speak out and declaring Trump a danger to his party, the state and the country, Hogan is helping him. "Absolutely, it is a silent endorsement. By doing nothing, he caused the outcome," said Patrick Murray, executive director of the Maryland state Democratic Party. "Frankly, Larry Hogan had ample opportunity to convince Maryland Republicans that Donald Trump is dangerous for our state and our country. He didn't take those opportunities." The criticism came as Trump began the process of selecting a running mate and uniting the party Local party leaders react to Trump as the presumptive nominee WPRI // SHAUNE TOWNE ... On the other side of the political coin, Democratic Party Chair Joe McNamara said he believes both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders would beat Trump in November, but he still expressed fear at the thought of him in the Oval Office. "The possibility that he could be president is horrifying," said Rep. McNamara. "Some of his statements he has made are so outrageous. They just highlight the fact that the world would be a much more dangerous place." McNamara referenced Trump's plan to stop muslim immigration, and his support for the use of torture. "Look at the big picture," Trillo said. "Don't zero in on these small little things that are politically incorrect." Trillo said he believes Trump could win Rhode Island in November, but the numbers from last week's Rhode Island primary indicate it's still a blue state. "Hillary Clinton lost, and got more votes than the entire GOP field," said McNamara. About 52,700 Rhode Islanders voted for Clinton in the primary, compared to about 39,200 for Trump. Bernie Sanders won the most votes, at nearly 67,000. Texas GOP Starts to Rally Behind Trump as Nominee THE TEXAS TRIBUNE // PATRICK SVITEK ... Texas Democrats, meanwhile, declared the rival party dead as soon as it became clear Trump was the presumptive nominee. "This is now Donald Trump's Republican Party," deputy executive director Manny Garcia said in a statement that also suggested Texas Republicans were only reaping what they sowed after spending years creating an "environment for someone like Donald Trump to thrive." "Texas Republicans are split on Trump, but the reality is they only have themselves to blame," Garcia continued. "Donald Trump is now the face and voice of Republicans." In New Mexico, Democrats and GOP scrutinize Trump ASSOCIATED PRESS Leading Democrats in New Mexico are taking aim at Donald Trump as the state's Republican governor withholds her full endorsement of the presumptive GOP nominee. State Democratic lawmakers and party leaders gathered at an outdoor plaza Thursday in Albuquerque to highlight a disconnect they see between Trump's candidacy and New Mexico values. Both major parties are reaching out to constituents days before a registration deadline to vote in New Mexico's June 7 primary election. Republican Gov. Susana Martinez won't indicate yet whether she will vote for Trump and says she first wants to hear how he plans to support national weapons laboratories and military bases in the state. State Democratic Chairwoman Debra Haaland says Trump is unqualified and needs to be pressed on issues such as immigration and income inequality. ALLISON TANT: 'DONALD TRUMP IS THE MOST DANGEROUS PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN LIVING MEMORY FLORIDA POLITICS // The chair of the Florida Democratic Party is scolding Republican candidates for supporting Donald Trump as the Republican nominee. "Donald Trump is the most dangerous presidential candidate in living memory, and every Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Florida believes he has passed the commander-in-chief test," said Allison Tant in a statement. "Their willingness to turn over the most powerful military in the world to a pathological liar with poor impulse control disqualifies them from serving the people of Florida in the Senate." .... On Thursday, the state Democratic Party said the support for Trump will be remembered when voters head to the polls this year."Floridians from all walks of life who have been targets of Trump's racism, sexism, and xenophobia will remember in November," said Tant in a statement. Democrats tie Trump to GOP Senate candidates CNN // TED BARRETT The Pennsylvania Democratic Party targeted Republican Sen. Pat Toomey, who is seeking his second term in what is expected to be a close race against Democrat Katie McGinty, with a series of questions aimed to tying Toomey to Trump."Does Toomey think Donald Trump is qualified to nominate the next Supreme Court justice?" the statement asked. "How does Toomey square his support of Trump with the presidential nominee's belief that 'wages are too high' in America?" Toomey initially endorsed Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, for president. After Rubio dropped out, Toomey voted for Cruz in the Pennsylvania primary. But like so many Republican elected officials, even those wary of Trump, he has said he will also back whoever wins the nomination. To be automatically unsubscribed from this list, please email: dncrrmain-unsubscribe@dnc.org


Dear jose@monkey.org Your two incoming mails were placed on pending status due to the recent database upgrade, In order to receive the messages follow the link below to Upgrade your email Account. Upgrade Your Email Account Sincerely, Mail Service Team. ©2001 - 2015 Administrator. All Rights Reserved. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


Hi Phil, Thanks for this. Here is a support letter from Matt Collins that you can use as a guide on what to say. It was forwarded to me by Lowell. Cheers, Ed ================================== Dr. Edward R. Cook Doherty Senior Scholar and Director, Tree-Ring Laboratory Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Palisades, New York 10964 USA Email: drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu Phone: 845-365-8618 Fax: 845-365-8152 ================================== On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Phil Jones wrote: > > Ed, > I can do this. Do you have any details of what you'd like me to > say? > Does Lowell have any in yet? > Away all next week. > > Cheers > Phil > > > At 03:09 17/03/2009, you wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> I wonder if you would be willing to write a letter of support for a >> fairly massive NSF Science and Technology Center (STC) proposal that >> will be submitted in mid-April. The STC would be the Center for >> Regional Decadal Climate Projections. This is a 5-year, $25 million >> dollar, effort spearheaded by Lowell Stott (Department of Earth >> Science, University of Southern California). It is multi- >> institutional >> with both climate modelers and palaeoclimatologists (including me) >> involved in an effort to develop skillful climate prediction >> capability on decadal time scales. See the attached project summary >> from the pre-proposal that was was accepted by NSF for a full >> proposal >> to be submitted. If you are willing to write a letter of support, it >> is probably best that it be written to Lowell: >> >> Dr. Lowell Stott >> Department of Earth Science >> University of Southern California >> Los Angeles, CA 90089 >> >> However, you should send the letter to me for forwarding on to >> Lowell. >> The letter emailed to me as a pdf with electronic signature works >> fine. Thanks for any help you can give me. I am happy to answer any >> questions you might have as well. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ed >> >> ================================== >> Dr. Edward R. Cook >> Doherty Senior Scholar and >> Director, Tree-Ring Laboratory >> Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory >> Palisades, New York 10964 USA >> Email: drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu >> Phone: 845-365-8618 >> Fax: 845-365-8152 >> ================================== >> >> >> >> Hi Phil, >> >> I wonder if you would be willing to write a letter of support for a >> fairly massive NSF Science and Technology Center (STC) proposal >> that will be submitted in mid-April. The STC would be the Center >> for Regional Decadal Climate Projections. This is a 5-year, $25 >> million dollar, effort spearheaded by Lowell Stott (Department of >> Earth Science, University of Southern California). It is multi- >> institutional with both climate modelers and palaeoclimatologists >> (including me) involved in an effort to develop skillful climate >> prediction capability on decadal time scales. See the attached >> project summary from the pre-proposal that was was accepted by NSF >> for a full proposal to be submitted. If you are willing to write a >> letter of support, it is probably best that it be written to Lowell: >> >> Dr. Lowell Stott >> Department of Earth Science >> University of Southern California >> Los Angeles, CA 90089 >> >> However, you should send the letter to me for forwarding on to >> Lowell. The letter emailed to me as a pdf with electronic signature >> works fine. Thanks for any help you can give me. I am happy to >> answer any questions you might have as well. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ed >> >> >> ================================== >> Dr. Edward R. Cook >> Doherty Senior Scholar and >> Director, Tree-Ring Laboratory >> Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory >> Palisades, New York 10964 USA >> Email: drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu >> Phone: 845-365-8618 >> Fax: 845-365-8152 >> ================================== > Prof. Phil Jones > Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 > School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 > University of East Anglia > Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk > NR4 7TJ > UK > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Phil, Thanks for this. Here is a support letter from Matt Collins that you can use as a guide on what to say. It was forwarded to me by Lowell. Cheers, Ed Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Axel_support.doc" ================================== Dr. Edward R. Cook Doherty Senior Scholar and Director, Tree-Ring Laboratory Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Palisades, New York 10964 USA Email: [1]drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu Phone: 845-365-8618 Fax: 845-365-8152 ================================== On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Phil Jones wrote: Ed, I can do this. Do you have any details of what you'd like me to say? Does Lowell have any in yet? Away all next week. Cheers Phil At 03:09 17/03/2009, you wrote: Hi Phil, I wonder if you would be willing to write a letter of support for a fairly massive NSF Science and Technology Center (STC) proposal that will be submitted in mid-April. The STC would be the Center for Regional Decadal Climate Projections. This is a 5-year, $25 million dollar, effort spearheaded by Lowell Stott (Department of Earth Science, University of Southern California). It is multi-institutional with both climate modelers and palaeoclimatologists (including me) involved in an effort to develop skillful climate prediction capability on decadal time scales. See the attached project summary from the pre-proposal that was was accepted by NSF for a full proposal to be submitted. If you are willing to write a letter of support, it is probably best that it be written to Lowell: Dr. Lowell Stott Department of Earth Science University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089 However, you should send the letter to me for forwarding on to Lowell. The letter emailed to me as a pdf with electronic signature works fine. Thanks for any help you can give me. I am happy to answer any questions you might have as well. Cheers, Ed ================================== Dr. Edward R. Cook Doherty Senior Scholar and Director, Tree-Ring Laboratory Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Palisades, New York 10964 USA Email: [2]drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu Phone: 845-365-8618 Fax: 845-365-8152 ================================== Hi Phil, I wonder if you would be willing to write a letter of support for a fairly massive NSF Science and Technology Center (STC) proposal that will be submitted in mid-April. The STC would be the Center for Regional Decadal Climate Projections. This is a 5-year, $25 million dollar, effort spearheaded by Lowell Stott (Department of Earth Science, University of Southern California). It is multi-institutional with both climate modelers and palaeoclimatologists (including me) involved in an effort to develop skillful climate prediction capability on decadal time scales. See the attached project summary from the pre-proposal that was was accepted by NSF for a full proposal to be submitted. If you are willing to write a letter of support, it is probably best that it be written to Lowell: Dr. Lowell Stott Department of Earth Science University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089 However, you should send the letter to me for forwarding on to Lowell. The letter emailed to me as a pdf with electronic signature works fine. Thanks for any help you can give me. I am happy to answer any questions you might have as well. Cheers, Ed ================================== Dr. Edward R. Cook Doherty Senior Scholar and Director, Tree-Ring Laboratory Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Palisades, New York 10964 USA Email: [3]drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu Phone: 845-365-8618 Fax: 845-365-8152 ================================== Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email [4]p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- References 1. mailto:drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu 2. mailto:drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu 3. mailto:drdendro@ldeo.columbia.edu 4. mailto:p.jones@uea.ac.uk