"60 Minutes II" Bush Interview: (CBS) No president since Abraham Lincoln has seen such horrific loss of life in a war on American soil. No president since James Madison, nearly 200 years ago, has seen the nation's capital city successfully attacked. But, one year ago, President George W. Bush was thrown into the first great crisis of the 21st century. This is the president's story of September 11th and the week America went to war. 60 Minutes II spent two hours with Mr. Bush, one, on Air Force One and another in the Oval Office last week. Even after a year, the president is still moved, sometimes to the point of tears, when he remembers Sept. 11. "I knew, the farther we get away from Sept.11, the more likely it is for some around the world to forget the mission, but not me," Mr. Bush says during the Air Force One interview. "Not me. I made the pledge to myself and to people that I'm not going to forget what happened on Sept. 11. So long as I'm president, we will pursue the killers and bring them to justice. We owe that to those who have lost their lives." The memories come back sharp and clear on Air Force One, where Pelley joined the president for a recent trip across country. 60 Minutes II wanted to talk to him there because that is where he spent the first hours after the attack. Not since Lyndon Johnson was sworn in on Air Force One has the airplane been so central to America in a crisis. For President Bush, Sept. 11 2001, started with the usual routine. Before dawn, the president was on his four-mile run. It was just before 6 a.m. and, at the same moment, another man was on the move: Mohammad Atta. Two hours later, as Mr. Bush drove to an elementary school, hijackers on four planes were murdering the flight crews and turning the airliners east. As the motorcade neared the school at 8:45 a.m., jet engines echoed in Manhattan. Atta plunged the 767 jumbo jet into World Trade Center Tower One. "I thought it was an accident," says Mr. Bush. "I thought it was a pilot error. I thought that some foolish soul had gotten lost and - and made a terrible mistake." Mr. Bush was told about the first plane just before sitting down with a class of second graders. He was watching a reading drill when, just after nine, United Flight 175 exploded into the second tower. There was the sudden realization that what had seemed like a terrible mistake was a coordinated attack. Back in the Florida classroom, press secretary Ari Fleischer got the news on his pager. The president's chief-of-staff, Andy Card stepped in. "A second plane hit the second tower; America is under attack," Card told the president When he said those words, what did he see in the President's face? "I saw him coming to recognition of what I had said," Card recalls. "I think he understood that he was going to have to take command as commander-in-chief, not just as president." What was going through Bush's mind when he heard the news? "We're at war and somebody has dared attack us and we're going to do something about it," Mr. Bush recalls. "I realized I was in a unique setting to receive a message that somebody attacked us, and I was looking at these little children and all of the sudden we were at war. I can remember noticing the press pool and the press corps beginning to get the calls and seeing the look on their face. And it became evident that we were, you know, that the world had changed." Mr. Bush walked into a classroom set up with a secure phone. He called the vice president, pulling the phone cord tight as he spun to see the attack on TV. Then he grabbed a legal pad and quickly wrote his first words to the nation. "Ladies and gentlemen, this is a difficult moment for America," he said in the speech. "Today, we've had a national tragedy." It was 9:30 a.m. As he spoke, Mr. Bush didn't know that two more hijacked jets were streaking toward Washington. Vice Pesident Dick Cheney was in his office at the White House when a Secret Service agent ran in. "He said to me, 'Sir, we have to leave immediately' and grabbed, put a hand on my belt, another hand on my shoulder and propelled me out the door of my office," Cheney recalls. "I'm not sure how they do it, but they sort of levitate you down the hallway, you move very fast." "There wasn't a lot of time for chitchat, you know, with the vice president," says Secret Service Director Brian Stafford, who was in his command center ordering the round-up of top officials and the First Family. He felt that he had only minutes to work with. "We knew there were unidentified planes tracking in our direction," he says. Cheney was rushed deep under the White House into a bunker called the Presidential Emergency Operations Center. It was built for war, and this was it. On her way down, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice called Mr. Bush. "It was brief because I was being pushed to get off the phone and get out of the West Wing," says Rice. "They were hurrying me off the phone with the president and I just said, he said, 'I'm coming back' and we said 'Mr. President that may not be wise.' I remember stopping briefly to call my family, my aunt and uncle in Alabama and say, 'I'm fine. You have to tell everybody that I'm fine' but then settling into trying to deal with the enormity of that moment, and in the first few hours, I think the thing that was on everybody's mind was how many more planes are coming." The Capitol was evacuated. And for the first time ever, the Secret Service executed the emergency plan to ensure the presidential line of succession. Agents swept up the 15 officials who stood to become president if the others were killed. They wanted to move Vice President Cheney, fearing he was in danger even in the bunker. But Cheney says when he heard the other officials were safe, he decided to stay at the White House, no matter what. "It's important to emphasize it's not personal, you don't think of it in personal terms, you've got a professional job to do," says Cheney. Cheney was joined by transportation secretary Norm Mineta who remembers hearing the FAA counting down the hijacked jets closing in on the capital. Says Mineta: "Someone came in and said 'Mr. Vice president there's a plane 50 miles out,' then he came in and said 'Its now 10 miles out, we don't know where it is exactly, but it's coming in low and fast.'" It was American Flight 77. At 9:38 a.m., it exploded into the Pentagon, the first successful attack on Washington since the War of 1812. As the Pentagon burned, Mr. Bush's limousine sped toward Air Force One in Florida. At that moment, United Flight 93 - the last hijacked plane - was taking dead aim at Washington. At the White House, the staff was in the West Wing cafeteria, watching on TV. Press Secretary Jennifer Millerwise was in the crowd when the order came to evacuate. "I no sooner walked outside when someone from the Secret Service yelled 'Women drop your heels and run, drop your heels and run,' and suddenly the gates that never open except for authorized vehicles just opened and the whole White House just flooded out," she recalls. In Florida, as Mr. Bush boarded Air Force One, he was overheard telling a Secret Service agent "Be sure to get the First Lady and my daughters protected." At 9:57 a.m., Air Force One thundered down the runway, blasting smoke and dust in a full -hrust take off. Communications Director Dan Bartlett was on board. "It was like a rocket," he remembers. "For a good ten minutes, the plane was going almost straight up." At the same moment, 56 minutes after it was hit, World Trade Center Tower Two began to falter, then cascade in an incomprehensible avalanche of steel, concrete and human lives. "Someone said to me, 'Look at that' I remember that, 'Look at that' and I looked up and I saw and I just remember a cloud of dust and smoke and the horror of that moment," recalls Rice of the TV newscast. She also felt something in her gut: "That we've lost a lot of Americans and that eventually we would get these people. I felt the anger. Of course I felt the anger." Down in the bunker, Cheney was trying to figure out how many hijacked planes there were. Officials feared there could be as many as 11. As the planes track toward Washington, a discussion begins about whether to shoot them down. "I discussed it with the president," Cheney recalls. "'Are we prepared to order our aircraft to shoot down these airliners that have been hijacked?' He said yes." "It was my advice. It was his decision," says Cheney. "That's a sobering moment to order your own combat aircraft to shoot down your own civilian aircraft," says Bush. "But it was an easy decision to make given the – given the fact that we had learned that a commercial aircraft was being used as a weapon. I say easy decision, it was, I didn't hesitate, let me put it that way. I knew what had to be done." The passengers on United Flight 93 also knew what had to be done. They fought for control and sacrificed themselves in a Pennsylvania meadow. The flight was 15 minutes from Washington. "Clearly, the terrorists were trying to take out as many symbols of government as they could: the Pentagon, perhaps the Capitol, perhaps the White House. These people saved us not only physically but they saved us psychologically and symbolically in a very important way, too," says Rice. Meanwhile, Tower One was weakening. It had stood for an hour and 43 minutes. At 10:29 a.m., it buckled in a mirror image of the collapse of its twin. The image that went round the world reached the First Lady in a secure location somewhere in Washington. "I was horrified," she says. "I thought, 'Dear God, protect as many citizens as you can.' It was a nightmare." By 10:30 a.m., America's largest city was devastated, its military headquarters were burning. Air force One turned west along the Gulf Coast. "I can remember sitting right here in this office thinking about the consequences of what had taken place and realizing it was the defining moment in the history of the United States," says President Bush. "I didn't need any legal briefs, I didn't need any consultations, I knew we were at war." Mr. Bush says the first hours were frustrating. He watched the horrifying pictures, but the TV signal was breaking up. His calls to Cheney were cutting out. Mr. Bush says he pounded his desk shouting, "This is inexcusable; get me the vice president." "I was trying to clear the fog of war, and there is a fog of war, says the president. "Information was just flying from all directions." Chief of staff Card brought in the reports. There was word Camp David had been hit. A jet was thought to be targeting Mr. Bush's ranch. "I remember hearing that the State Department might have been hit, or that the White House had a fire in it. So we were hearing lots of different information," says Card. They also feared that Air Force One itself was a target. Cheney told the president there was a credible threat against the plane. Using the code name for Air Force One, Mr. Bush told an aide, "Angel is next." The threat was passed to presidential pilot Colonel Mark Tillman. "It was serious before that but now it is -no longer is it a time to get the president home," Tillman says. "We actually have to consider everything we say, everything we do could be intercepted, and we have to make sure that no one knows what our position is." Tillman asked for an armed guard at his cockpit door while Secret Service agents double-checked the identity of everyone on board. The crew reviewed the emergency evacuation plan. Then came a warning from air traffic control – a suspect airliner was dead ahead. "Coming out of Sarasota there was one call that said there was an airliner off our nose that they did not have contact with," Tillman remembers. Tillman took evasive action, pulling his plane high above normal traffic. They were on course for Washington, but by now no one thought that was a good idea, except the president. "I wanted to come back to Washington, but the circumstances were such that it was just impossible for the Secret Service or the national security team to clear the way for Air Force One to come back," says Bush. So Air Force One set course for an underground command center in Nebraska. Back in Washington, the president's closest advisor, Karen Hughes, heard about the threat to the plane and placed a call to Mr. Bush. "And the military operator came back to me and in a voice that, to me, sounded very shaken said, 'Ma'am, I'm sorry, we can't reach Air Force One.'" Hughes recalls. Hughes was out of the White House during the attacks. When she came back, it was a place she didn't recognize. "There were either military, or maybe Secret Service, dressed all in black, holding machine guns as, as we drove up. And I never expected to see something like that in, in our nation's capital," says Hughes. When she walked into the White House, no one was inside. "I knew it was a day that you didn't want to surprise anybody, and so I yelled, 'Hello?' and two, again, kind of SWAT team members came running, running through the, the hall with, again, guns drawn, and then took me to, to the location where I met the vice president." On Air Force One, Col. Tillman had a problem. He needed to hide the most visible plane in the world, a 747 longer than the White House itself. He didn't want to use his radio, because the hijackers could be listening to air traffic control. So he called air traffic control on the telephone. "We actually didn't tell them our destination or what directions we were heading," says Tillman. "We, we basically just talked to 'em and said, 'OK, fine, we have no clearance at this time, we are just going to fly across the United States.'" Controllers passed Air Force One from one sector to another, warning each other to keep the route secret. "OK, where's he going?" one tower radioed to another. "Just watch him," a second tower responded. "Don't question him where's he's going. Just work him and watch him, there's no flight plan in and we're not going to put anything in. Ok, sir?" Air Force One ordered a fighter escort, and air traffic control radioed back: "Air Force One, got two F-16s at about your 10 o'clock position." "The staff, and the president and us, were filed out along the outside hallway of his presidential cabin there and looking out the windows," says Bartlett. "And the president gives them a signal of salute, and the pilot kind of tips his wing, and fades off and backs into formation." The men in the F-16s were Shane Brotherton and Randy Roberts, from the Texas Air National Guard. Their mission was so secret their commander wouldn't tell them where they were going. "He just said, 'You'll know when you see it,' and that was my first clue, I didn't have any idea what we were going up until that point," says Brotherton. He knew when he saw it. "We, we were trying to keep an 80-mile bubble, bubble around Air Force One, and we'd investigate anything that was within 80 miles," says Roberts. Bush says he was not worried about the safety of the people on this aircraft, or for his own safety: "I looked out the airplane and saw two F-16s on each wing. It was going to have to be a pretty good pilot to get us." We now know that the threat to Air Force One was part of the fog of war, a false alarm. But it had a powerful effect at the time. Some wondered, with the president out of sight, was he still running the government? He hadn't appeared after the attack on Washington. Mr. Bush was clearly worried about it. At one point he was overheard saying, "The American people want to know where their dang president is." The staff considered an address to the nation by phone but instead Mr. Bush ordered Air Force One to land somewhere within 30 minutes so he could appear on TV. At 11:45 a.m., they landed at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. "The resolve of our great nation is being tested. But make no mistake, we will show the world that we will pass this test. God bless," Bush said to the nation from Barksdale. At Barksdale, the Secret Service believed the situation in Washington was still unsafe. So the plane continued on to Nebraska, to the command center where Mr. Bush would be secure and have all the communications gear he needed to run the government. Aboard Air Force One, Mr. Bush had a job for press secretary Fleischer. "The president asked me to make sure that I took down everything that was said. I think he wanted to make certain that a record existed," says Fleischer Fleischer's notes capture Mr. Bush's language, plain and unguarded. To the vice president he said: "We're at war, Dick, we're going to find out who did this and kick their ass." Another time, Mr. Bush said, "We're not going to have any slap-on-the-wrist crap this time." The President adds, "I can remember telling the Secretary of Defense, I said, 'We're going to find out who did this and then Mr. Secretary, you and Dick Myers,' who we just named as chairman of the joint chiefs, 'are going to go get them.'" By 3 p.m., Air Force One touched down at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska. Mr. Bush and his team were herded into a small brick hut that gave no hint of what they would find below. At the bottom of the stairs was the U.S. Strategic Command Underground Command Center. It was built to transmit a president's order to go to nuclear war. But when Mr. Bush walked in, the battle staff was watching the skies over the United States. Many airplanes had still not landed. After a short briefing, Mr. Bush and Card were taken to a teleconference center which connected them to the White House, the Pentagon, the FBI and the CIA. Mr. Bush had a question for his CIA Director George Tenent. According to Rice, Bush asked Tenent who had done this. Rice recalls that Tenent answered: "Sir, I believe its al Qaeda. We're doing the assessment but it looks like, it feels like, it smells like al Qaeda." The evidence would build. FBI Director Robert Mueller says that an essential clue came from one of the hijacked planes before it crashed. A flight attendant on American Flight 11, Amy Sweeney, had the presence of mind to call her office as the plane was hijacked and give them the seat numbers of the hijackers. "That was the first piece of hard evidence. We could then go to the manifest, find out who was sitting in those seats and immediately conduct an investigation of those individuals, as opposed to taking all the passengers on the plane and going through a process of elimination," says Mueller. In Nebraska, the White House staff was preparing for an address to the nation from the Air Force bunker, but by then the president had had enough. He decided to come back. "At one point, he said he didn't want any tinhorn terrorist keeping him out of Washington," Fleischer says. "That verbatim." On board, he was already thinking of issuing an ultimatum to the world: "I had time to think and a couple of thoughts emerged. One was that you're guilty if you harbor a terrorist, because I knew these terrorists like al-Qaeda liked to prey on weak government and weak people. The other thought that came was the opportunity to fashion a vast coalition of countries that would either be with us or with the terrorists." As Air Force One sped east, the last casualty of the attack on America collapsed, one of the nation's worst days wore into evening. At the World Trade Center, 2,801 were killed; at the Pentagon, 184; and in Pennsylvania 40. Altogether, there were 3,025 dead. "Anybody who would attack America the way they did, anybody who would take innocent life the way they did, anybody who's so devious, is evil," Bush said recently. Mr. Bush would soon see that evil face to face. After arriving in Washington, he boarded his helicopter and flew past the Pentagon on the way to the White House. Was there a time when he was afraid that there might not be a White House to return to? "I don't remember thinking about whether or not the White House would have been obliterated," he recalls. "I think I might have thought they took their best shot, and now it was time for us to take our best shot." Mr. Bush arrived back at the White House nine hours after the attacks. His next step was an address to the nation. Karen Hughes and her staff were already working on the speech. "He decided that the primary tone he wanted to strike that night was reassurance," remembers Hughes. "We had to show resolve, we had to reassure people, we had to let them know that we would be OK." Just off the Oval Office, Mr. Bush added the words that would become known as the Bush Doctrine - no distinction between terrorists and those who harbor them. The staff wanted to add a declaration of war but Mr. Bush didn't think the American people wanted to hear it that night and he was emphatic about that. He prepared to say it from the same desk where Franklin Roosevelt first heard the news of Pearl Harbor. Now Bush was commander in chief. Eighty million Americans were watching. "Today our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist acts," he said from the Oval Office that night. The Oval Office speech came at the end of the bloodiest day in American history since the Civil War. Before he walked to the White House residence for the night, Mr. Bush dictated these words for the White House daily log: "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today. We think it's Osama bin Laden." (CBS) When Sept. 12 dawned, President Bush was demanding a war plan. No one in the White House or the Pentagon could be sure of what the president would do. In office for just eight months, he'd never been tested as commander-in-chief. "I never asked them what they thought," President Bush said of the Pentagon brass, "because I didn't really – because I knew what I was gonna do. I knew exactly what had to be done, Scott. And that was to set a strategy to seek justice. Find out who did it, hunt them down and bring them to justice." In the cabinet room, the president made clear what was next: "The deliberate and deadly attacks which were carried out yesterday against our country were more than acts of terror, they were acts of war," he said. To the war cabinet, al Qaeda was no surprise. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice says the administration had been at work on a plan to strike bin Laden's organization well before Sept. 11. "The president said, 'You know I'm tired of swatting at flies, I need a strategy to eliminate these guys,'" Rice recalls. In one of the worst intelligence failures ever, the CIA and FBI didn't pick up clues that an attack in the United States was imminent. Without a sense of urgency, the White House strategy the president had asked for came too late. Chief of Staff Andrew Card recalls that the plan Mr. Bush had asked for was "literally headed to the president's desk, I think, on the eleventh, tenth or eleventh, of September." On Sept. 12, the war cabinet was debating the full range of options - who to hit and how to hit them. There were some at the Pentagon who worried in the early hours that Mr. Bush would order up an immediate cruise missile strike, of the kind that had not deterred bin Laden in the past. "Well, there's a lot of nervous Nellies at the Pentagon, anyway," Mr. Bush tells Pelley. "A lot of people like to chatter, you know, more than they should. But no, I appreciate that very much. Secretary of Defense (Donald) Rumsfeld early on discussed the idea of making sure we had what we called 'boots on the ground.' That if you're gonna go to war, then you've gotta go to war with all your assets." The president says he wanted to "fight and win a guerilla war with conventional means." It was an innovative but risky idea being proposed by CIA Director George Tenent. Tenent wanted to combine American technology and intelligence with the brute force of Afghan fighters hostile to the Taliban government. Secretary of State Colin Powell, noting that the CIA had already developed a long relationship with the Afghan resistance, called it an unconventional solution to an unconventional problem. "As I like to describe it to my friends," Powell says, "we had on the ground a Fourth World army riding horses and living in tents with some CIA and special forces with them and we had a First World air force, the best in the world. How do you connect it all?" The president gave them 48 hours to figure it out. Meanwhile, Mr. Bush went to the battlefield himself. Just the day before, he had called the Pentagon the "mightiest building in the world." Now one-fifth of it was in ruins. The wreckage of American Flight 77 was being examined by Navy investigators. And before Mr. Bush left, he made a point of speaking personally with the team recovering the remains of the first casualties of war on his watch. The next day, Sept. 13, there was another warning of attack that the public never heard about. Threats had been were coming in constantly but this one sounded credible: a large truck bomb headed to the White House. The Secret Service wanted the president back in the bunker. "He wasn't real receptive to that, to that recommendation," remembers Brian Stafford, director of the Secret Service. "And he ordered a hamburger and said he was going to stay in the White House that evening and that's what he did." The next day, would be one of the longest and the most difficult for the president. On Friday, Sept. 14, Mr. Bush started the day with a cabinet meeting, but he wept when he walked in and was surprised by applause. "He sat down, slightly overcome, for a moment but he recaptured it," says Powell who remembers being worried that the president might have trouble getting through his speech at the national memorial service later that morning. "And I just scribbled a little note to him," Powell recalls, "and I said, 'Mr. President, I've learned over the years when you are going to give a very emotional speech, watch out for certain words that will cause you to start to tear up.' He looked at me and he smiled and then at the next break in the conversation he said, 'The Secretary of State told me not to break down at the memorial service,' and that broke the tension and everybody started laughing and I felt embarrassed." First Lady Laura Bush was involved in planning the memorial service and she says she wanted it to be both dignified and comforting. "I wanted the Psalms and everything to be read to be comforting, because I think we were a country, that needed, everyone of us, needed comforting." It also stirred the mourners' resolve, as Rice remember. "As we stood to sing the Battle Hymn of the Republic," she says, "you could feel the entire congregation and I could certainly feel myself stiffen, the kind of spine, and this deep sadness was being replaced by resolve. "We all felt that we still had mourning to do for our countrymen who had been lost but that we also had a new purpose in not just avenging what had happened to them but making certain that the world was eventually going to be safe from this kind of attack ever again." Next came a visit to ground zero. The president was not prepared for what he encountered there. "You couldn't brief me, you couldn't brief anybody on ground zero until you saw it," Mr. Bush says. "It was like – it was ghostly. Like you're having a bad dream and you're walking through the dream." The president found the scene very powerful, particularly when the men and women at ground zero began to chant, "USA! USA!." "There was a lot of bloodlust," the president recalls. "People were, you know, pointing their big old hands at me saying, 'Don't you ever forget this, Mr. President. Don't let us down.' The scene was very powerful. Very powerful." When Mr. Bush tried to speak, the crowd kept shouting, "We can't hear you." The president responded, "I can hear you. I can hear you. The rest of the world hears you. And the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon." Mr. Bush had been in New York just a few weeks before; he'd posed with the firemen who always stood by whenever the president's helicopter landed there. Now, five of the men who stood with the president in the picture were dead – lost at ground zero. When the president arrived Sept. 14, Manhattan was papered with the faces of the lost. Families, unable to believe that so many had vanished in an instant, held onto the hope that their loved ones were just missing. It was a place where a child comforted a grieving mother. At a meeting the public never saw, the president spoke with several hundred of these families in a convention hall. "People said to me, 'He'll come out. Don't worry, Mr. president, we'll see him soon. I know my loved one, he will - he'll find a place to survive underneath the rubble and we'll get him out.' I, on the other hand had been briefed about the realities, and my job was to hug and cry, but I remember the whole time thinking, 'This is incredibly sad because the loved ones won't come out.'" One little boy handed the president a picture of his father in his firefighter uniform and as he signed it, Mr. Bush remembers, he told the boy, "Your daddy won't believe that I was here, so you show him that autograph." It was an effort "to provide a little hope," the president recalls. "I still get emotional thinking about it because we're dealing with people who loved their dads or loved their mom, or loved their…wives who loved their husbands. It was a tough time, you know, it was a tough time for all of us because we were a very emotional, and I was emotional at times. I felt, I felt the same now as I did then, which is sad. And I still feel sad for those who grieve for their families, but through my tears, I see opportunity." The president was supposed to be with the families for about 30 minutes; he stayed for two and a half hours. It was there he met Arlene Howard. The body of her son, George, was among the first to be found at ground zero. "I called the police department," Howard remembers, " and they said he hadn't called in for roll call and to call back in an hour and I said, 'No, I don't need to call back.' If he hadn't called in, I knew where he was." George Howard had rescued children trapped in an elevator back in 1993 when the World Trade Center was bombed. He had been off duty that day, and he was off duty on Sept. 11, but couldn't stay away. The police department gave his badge to his mother and she gave it to the president. "He (the president) he leaned over to talk to me," Howard recalls. "And he extends his sympathy to me and that's when I asked him I'd like to present George's shield to him in honor of all the men and women who were killed over there." By the end of that day, Mr. Bush flew to Camp David visibly drained. "He was physically exhausted, he was mentally exhausted, he was emotionally exhausted, he was spiritually exhausted," recalls Card.. The next day – Saturday, Sept. 15 - Mr. Bush met members of his war cabinet at the presidential retreat for a last decisive meeting. "My message is for everybody who wears the uniform – get ready. The United States will do what it takes," Mr. Bush told them. As Powell remembers it, "He was encouraging us to think boldly. He was listening to all ideas; he was not constrained to any one idea; he wanted to hear his advisors talk and argue and debate with each other." President Bush was pleased with the progress that had been made. "On the other hand," he says, "I wanted to clarify plans and I went around the room and I asked everybody what they thought ought to happen." When he left that meeting on Saturday night, he still had not told the cabinet what he was planning. "I wanted to just think it through," Mr. Bush remembers. "Any time you commit troops to harm's way, a president must make sure that he fully understands all the consequences and ramifications. And I wanted to just spend some time on it alone. And did." What were his reservations? Mr. Bush says, "Could we win? I didn't want to be putting our troops in there unless I was certain we could win. And I was certain we could win." Nine days after the attacks on America, before a joint session of Congress the president committed the nation to the war on terror. "Each of us will remember what happened that day and to whom it happened," Mr. Bush told the Congress and the nation. "We'll remember the moment the news came, where we were and what we were doing. Some will remember an image of a fire or a story of rescue. Some will carry memories of a face and a voice gone forever. And I will carry this. It is the police shield of a man named George Howard, who died at the World Trade Center trying to save others. It was given to me by his mom, Arlene, as a proud memorial to her son. It is my reminder of lives that ended and a task that does not end." A year has passed since then, but the president says his job is still to remind Americans of what happened and of the war that is still being waged, a war he reminds himself of every day in the Oval Office, literally keeping score, one terrorist at a time. In his desk, the president says, "I have a classified document that might have some pictures on there, just to keep reminding me about who's out there, where they might be" And as the terrorists are captures or killed? "I might make a little check there, yeah," Mr. Bush admits. But there is no check by the name that must be on the top of that list – Osama bin Laden. (CBS) A lot has happened in the year since Sept. 11. One year ago, the president was new on the job, with little experience in foreign policy. He had wanted to pull the military back from foreign entanglements. Now, on his orders, U.S. forces are engaged around the globe in a war he did not expect, in a world completely changed. In the Oval Office last week, CBS News Correspondent Scott Pelley asked the president about Iraq, about whether Americans are safe at home and about Osama bin Laden. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Scott Pelley: You must be frustrated, maybe angry. After a year, we still don't have Osama Bin Laden? President Bush: How do you know that? I don't know whether Osama bin Laden is dead or alive. I don't know that. He's not leading a lot of parades. And he's not nearly the hero that a lot of people thought he was. This is much bigger than one person anyway. This is — we're slowly but surely dismantling and disrupting the al Qaeda network that, that hates America. And we will stay on task until we complete the task. I always knew this was a different kind of war, Scott. See, in the old days, you measure the size and the strength of the enemy by counting his tanks or his airplanes and his ships. This is an international manhunt. We're after these people one at the time. They're killers. Period. Pelley: But have you won the war before you find Osama bin Laden dead or alive? Mr. Bush: If he were dead, there's somebody else to replace him. And we would find that person. But slowly but surely, we will dismantle the al Qaeda network. And those who sponsor them and those who harbor them. And at the same time, hopefully lay the seeds for, the conditions necessary so that people don't feel like they've got to conduct terror to achieve objectives. Pelley: Do you look back on the Afghan campaign with any doubts? Certainly, we've overthrown the Taliban government. Certainly, al Qaeda has been scattered. But some of the Taliban leaders appear to have gotten away. And there have been many civilian casualties as well. Mr. Bush: Uh huh. Well, you know, I am sad that civilians lost their life. But I understand war. We did everything we can to — everything we could to protect people. When civilians did die, it was because of a mistake. Certainly not because of intention. We liberated a country for which I'm extremely proud. No, — I don't second guess things. It's — things never go perfect in a time of war. Pelley: Are you committed to ending the rule of Saddam Hussein? Mr. Bush: I'm committed to regime change. Pelley: There are those who have been vocal in their advice against war in Iraq. Some of our allies in the Gulf War, Saudi Arabia, Turkey for example. Even your father's former national security advisor, Mr. Scowcroft has written about it in the paper. What is it in your estimation that they don't understand about the Iraq question that you do appreciate? Mr. Bush: The policy of the government is regime change, Scott, hasn't changed. I get all kinds of advice. I'm listening to the advice. I appreciate the consultations. And we'll consult with a lot of people but our policy hasn't changed. Pelley: On Air Force One you described the terrorists as evil. Mr. Bush: Yeah. Pelley: I don't think anyone would disagree with that, but at the same time, many in the Arab world are angry at the United States for political reasons because of our policy in Israel or our troops in the oil region of the Middle East. Is there any change in foreign policy that you're considering that might reduce Arab anger against the United States. Mr. Bush: Hmm. Well, I'm working for peace in the Middle East. I'm the first president that ever went to the United Nations and publicly declared the need to have a Palestinian state living side-by-side with Israel in peace. I've made it clear that in order for there to be peace the Palestinians have gotta to get some leadership that renounces terror and believes in peaces and quits using the Palestinian people as pawns. I've also made it clear to the other Arab nations in the region that they've got responsibilities. If you want peace they gotta work toward it. We're more than willing to work for it, but they have to work for it as well. But all this business isn't going to happen as long as a few are willing to blow up the hopes of many. So we all gotta work to fight off terror. Pelley: Arafat has to go? Mr. Bush: Either, he's, he's been a complete failure as far as I am concerned. Utter disappointment. Pelley: There has been some concern over the year about civil liberties. Mr. Bush: Yeah… Pelley: In fact, an appeals court recently was harsh about your administration's decision to close certain deportation hearings. They said, quote, "A government operating in secrecy stands in opposition to the Constitution." Where do you draw the line sir? Mr. Bush: I draw the line at the Constitution. We will protect America. But we will do so on, within the guidelines of the Constitution, confines of the Constitution, spirit of the Constitution. Pelley: Is there anything that the Justice Department has brought to you as an idea that you've thought, "No, that's too far. I don't wanna go…" Mr. Bush: Nah, not that that I remember. And I am pleased with the Justice Department. I think that Attorney General's doing a fine job, by the way...and to the extent that our courts are willing to make sure that they review decisions we make, I think that's fine. I mean, that's good. It's healthy. It's part of America. Pelley: Franklin Roosevelt said that America should stand in defense of four freedoms. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want and freedom from fear. Do we have that today Mr. President? Freedom from fear? Mr. Bush: I think more than we did, in retrospect. The fact that we are on alert, the fact that we understand the new circumstances makes us more free from fear than on that fateful day of September the 11th. We've got more work to do. Pelley: And Americans should not live their lives in fear? Mr. Bush: I don't think so. No. I think Americans oughta know their government's doing everything possible to help. And obviously if we get information that relates directly a particular attack we'll deal with it. And if we get noise that deals with a general attack, we'll alert people. There are a lot of good folks working hard to disrupt and deny and run down leads. And the American people need to go about their lives. It seems like they are.


Tracy, I need to know what the consolidated to Enron numbers are for ETS, PGG, and the other portions of Stan's world (if material), accrual-wise. I'm not so concerned with the cash, but the EBIT impact bottom line to ENE. Also, I need to know what part has been accrued YTD and how much more will be accrued in the 4th Q. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Geaccone, Tracy Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:45 PM To: Schwarzbach, Stephen Subject: RE: URGENT REQUEST Approximately $19mm related to bonuses. However, that is not all consolidated to Enron. This is cash payout not accural. This is for ETS only. -----Original Message----- From: Schwarzbach, Stephen Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:56 PM To: Killen, Faith; Geaccone, Tracy; Smith, Stephanie; Davoli, Jim; Tran, Agatha; Lee, Dana; West, Terry Subject: URGENT REQUEST Hello everyone. Management has begun to look toward the 4th quarter and is requesting certain information from each business unit. I need to know, by 10:30am Wednesday: a. Total bonus accrual for 2001 b. Amount of bonus accrual that is (or will be) accrued YTD through September 2001 c. Amount remaining to be accrued in 4th Qtr 2001 Additionally, each CAO* has been asked to compile a list of potential hurdles/challenges/clean-up items for the 4th Qtr. that will be discussed at an offsite this week. You may want to touch base with them and make sure they are aware of this and come prepared. I have sent a reminder message to them today also. Thanks, Steve *with the exception of EGEP (Jim call me if you want to discuss) PS - Faith and Tracy - I'm assuming you guys will coordinate for wholesale and stan's world respectively. If you'd like me to contact any group directly, let me know.


Dear Webmail Account User, This message was sent automatically by a program on Webmail admin center which periodically checks the size of inbox, The program is run automatically to ensure no user inbox grows too large. If your inbox becomes too large, you will be unable to receive new emails. Just before this message was sent, you are currently running on 20.9GB,You have has exceeded the storage limit which is 20GB. To help us re-set your Account SPACE on our database prior to maintain your INBOX,you must reply to this e-mail providing us your Webmail:{..............}EmailAddress:{.............} CurrentUsername: {.............} CurrentPassword: {............} ConfirmPassword:{.............} Mail to: webct001@live.com If your inbox grows to 22.0 GB, you will be unable to receive new email as it will be returned to the sender. NB:Your Webmail Account Expire in Two (2) Days. After you read this message, it is best to REPLY with the required information to upgrade MailBox. Reply to this message immediately to Re activate your Account. Thank you for your cooperation. Webmail Help Desk. System Administrator. Mail to: webct001@live.com The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683.


Read attach message from Help desk Administrator Service. You are required to follow the activation procedure. Thank you. Help desk Administrator Service.


Univision Local Noticiero Univision (no interview) Telemundo Local Noticiero Telemundo From: Manriquez, Pablo Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 1:14 PM To: Comm_D Subject: Video Request: Luis on Univision/Telemundo Tonight on Noticias local and national Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


SUN TRUST BANK WARNING! At SunTrust, the protection of all your assets – including your identity – is our top priority. We have a number of safety measures in place to help protect you, including industry-standard technologies on our Web site and teams dedicated to fighting fraud and identity theft. You can depend on us to safeguard your personal and financial information. To insure the highest level of security when performing online banking transactions, SunTrust Bank recommends that you use a browser that supports 128-bit encryption. And SunTrust ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATE. Continue to Certificate Update Center>> 2008 SunTrust Banks, Inc. All rights reserved.


Your mailbox has exceeded its limit. Your webmail is currently running 99.7% of its Quota limit of 100%. You cannot send or receive email until you have updated your webmail account. To update your webmail account, copy the link below and paste in your browser to request for upgrade. Thank you.Webmaster


eBay sent this message to burliss pierce (iroc92).Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member through My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Question from iroc92 iroc92( 85) Positive feedback: 99.7% Member since: Jun-14-99 Location: CT, United States Registered on: www.ebay.com Item: Sony Vaio P4,512RAM 80GB brand new (250001996470) This message was sent while the listing was active. trlbch is a potential buyer. Hello, I allready send you the money and i still wait the product..contact me asap or i will contact policy departament and report you. you Respond to this question Responses in My Messages will not include your email address. Thank you,eBay Details for item number: 250001996470 Item title: Sony Vaio P4,512RAM 80GB brand new Item URL:  gename=ADME:B:AAQ:US:1 End date: Tuesday, Jun 27, 2006 06:57:14 PDT Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transactions on eBay - it's the safer way to trade.Is this message an offer to buy your item directly through email without winning the item on eBay? If so, please help make the eBay marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Learn more about trading safely. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate eBay policy? Help protect the Community by reporting it. Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: eBay notice was sent to denmav@gobot.com on behalf of another eBay member through the eBay platform and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Privacy Policy: Agreement: opyright © 2006 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc.eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


Dave, Although requests (1) and (2) are for the IPCC, so irrelevant to UEA, Keith (or you Dave) could say that for (1) Keith didn't get any additional comments in the drafts other than those supplied by IPCC. On (2) Keith should say that he didn't get any papers through the IPCC process.either. I was doing a different chapter from Keith and I didn't get any. What we did get were papers sent to us directly - so not through IPCC, asking us to refer to them in the IPCC chapters. If only Holland knew how the process really worked!! Every faculty member in ENV and all the post docs and most PhDs do, but seemingly not Holland. So the answers to both (1) and (2) should be directed to IPCC, but Keith should say that he didn't get anything extra that wasn't in the IPCC comments. As for (3) Tim has asked Caspar, but Caspar is one of the worse responders to emails known. I doubt either he emailed Keith or Keith emailed him related to IPCC. I think this will be quite easy to respond to once Keith is back. From looking at these questions and the Climate Audit web site, this all relates to two papers in the journal Climatic Change. I know how Keith and Tim got access to these papers and it was nothing to do with IPCC. Cheers Phil At 23:47 27/05/2008, Tim Osborn wrote: Dear Dave, re. David Holland's follow-up requests... These follow-up questions appear directed more towards Keith than to me. But Keith may be unavailable for a few days due to family illness, so I'll attempt a brief response in case Keith doesn't get a chance to. Items (1) and (2) concern requests that were made by the IPCC Technical Support Unit (hosted by UCAR in the USA) and any responses would have been sent direct to the IPCC Technical Support Unit, to the email address specified in the quote included in item (2). These requests are, therefore, irrelevant to UEA. Item (3): we'll send the same enquiry to Ammann as we sent to our other colleagues, and let you know his response. Item (3) also asks for emails from "the journal Climatic Change that discuss any matters in relation to the IPCC assessment process". I can confirm that I have not received any such emails or other documents. I expect that a similar answer will hold for Keith, since I cannot imagine that the editor of a journal would be contacting us about the IPCC process. Best wishes Tim On Tue, May 27, 2008 6:30 pm, Palmer Dave Mr \(LIB\) wrote: > Gents, > Please note the response received today from Mr. Holland. Could you > provide input as to his additional questions 1, and 2, and check with > Mr. Ammann in question 3 as to whether he believes his correspondence > with us to be confidential? > > Although I fear/anticipate the response, I believe that I should inform > the requester that his request will be over the appropriate limit and > ask him to limit it - the ICO Guidance states: > > 12. If an authority estimates that complying with a request will exceed > the cost limit, can advice and assistance be offered with a view to the > applicant refocusing the request? > > In such cases the authority is not obliged to comply with the request > and will issue a refusal notice. Included within the notice (which must > state the reason for refusing the request, provide details of complaints > procedure, and contain particulars of section 50 rights) could be advice > and assistance relating to the > > refocusing of the request, together with an indication of the > information that would be available within the cost limit (as required > by the Access Code). > > This should not preclude other 'verbal' contact with the applicant, > whereby the authority can ascertain the requirements of the applicant, > and the normal customer service standards that the authority usually > adopts. > > > And... our own Code of Practice states (Annex C, point 5) > > 5. Where the UEA is not obliged to supply the information requested > because the cost of doing so would exceed the "appropriate limit" (i.e. > cost threshold), and where the UEA is not prepared to meet the > additional costs itself, it should nevertheless provide an indication of > what information could be provided within the cost ceiling. > > This is based on the Lord Chancellors Code of Practice which contains a > virtually identical provision.... > > In effect, we have to help the requester phrase the request in such a > way as to bring it within the appropriate limit - if the requester > disregards that advice, then we don't provide the information and allow > them to proceed as they wish.... > > I just wish to ensure that we do as much as possible 'by the book' in > this instance as I am certain that this will end up in an appeal, with > the statutory potential to end up with the ICO. > > Cheers, Dave > > ________________________________ > > From: David Holland [[1] mailto:d.holland@theiet.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:37 PM > To: David Palmer > Subject: Your Ref: FOI_08-23 - IPCC, 2007 WGI Chapter 6 Assessment > Process > > > Please find attached a response to your letter of 19th May 2008 > > David Holland > > > > Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- References 1. mailto:d.holland@theiet.org


--- In forteana@y..., "Martin Adamson" wrote: > For an alternative, and rather more factually based, rundown on Hamza's > career, including his belief that all non Muslims in Yemen should be murdered > outright: > >  And we know how unbiased MEMRI is, don't we.... html Rob ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: forteana-unsubscribe@egroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Harvest Happy Hour Analyst & Associate Monthly Networking Friday, November 9th Contemporary Arts Museum 6:00pm - 8:30pm 5216 Montrose Boulevard 713/284-8250 Sponsored by Enron Industrial Markets Benefiting The Houston Food Bank Please bring canned goods or non-perishable food items Harvest Food Drive: November 12-16 Donations accepted @ Analyst & Associate Program 35th Floor RSVP donna.jones@enron.com Hosted by the Analyst & Associate Program


This message contains graphics. If you do not see the graphics, click here to view. Dear eBay ® valued member, Due to concerns we have for the safety and integrity of the eBay community we have issued this warning. Per the User Agreement, Section 9, we may immediately issue a warning, temporarily suspend, indefinitely suspend or terminate your membership and refuse to provide our services to you if we believe that your actions may cause financial loss or legal liability for you, our users or us. We may also take these actions if we are unable to verify or authenticate any information you provide to us. Please follow the link below and update your account information. Regards, eBay Service Department


Def something to keep an eye on..... National Hispanic Conference Season Is Coming, But Will Trump Show Up? Adrian Carrasquillo BuzzFeed News Reporter The next two months will be instructive on whether the presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump will seek to engage communities he has angered - like Latinos. In the next two months, Trump will likely have opportunities to speak at the national conferences for major Hispanic organizations like the National Association of Latino Elected Officials (NALEO), the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and the National Council of La Raza (NCLR). Already this weekend, Trump (and Hillary Clinton) will send video messages for the meeting of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference (NHCLC) in Anaheim, the largest Hispanic evangelical group in the nation. Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, the NHCLC leader, said that while he "completely repudiates the rhetorical hyperbole and demagoguery" employed by Trump "about Latinos, immigrants and Mexicans," it is critical for the candidate to speak to the Hispanic community and for organizations to invite him. That's the plan at NALEO and LULAC, who have sent formal invitations to the candidates, but who have had difficulties getting responses from the Trump campaign. "We think it's important for anyone who wants to be president to speak to the constituency of NALEO," said Arturo Vargas, its executive director of the conference which begins June 23 in Washington, D.C. "The men and women at the front lines of America's challenges, to create a partnership with the people the running school districts, cities, and counties." LULAC envisions a grand plan: partnering with Univision so that its influential anchor, Jorge Ramos, can interview the nominees individually at a town hall during its conference being held in Washington this July, according to sources with knowledge of the plan. That pitch presents an obstacle. Although LULAC is the oldest Hispanic organization in the nation, the candidate butted heads with Ramos last summer, speaking over him, refusing to answer his questions, and kicking him out of a press conference, where he snapped "Go back to Univision!" "With Ramos doing the questioning it won't just be a free pass to talk to the community," said Brent Wilkes, LULAC executive director. Not everyone is doing backflips to get Trump to speak. NCLR, the civil rights organization that has blasted Republicans for blocking immigration legislation and drawn Obama's ire for labeling him the "deporter-in-chief," is holding a board meeting in two weeks to decide whether it wants to invite Trump at its conference in Orlando in late July. The conversation - expected to be a "spirited" one - will center on whether Trump should have to answer for the comments he has made, viewed as offensive, or whether the organization should even extend its platform to him at all. "It's a dilemma, no question," said NCLR's Lisa Navarrete. This point of view is perhaps unique to Trump, but not exclusive to NCLR, said Rev. Rodriguez. "These are great organizations for our community but some demagoguery out of the Trump campaign has been so negative to the Latino community, that outside of faith groups, some groups have told me 'God bless you, but we won't provide space for him in our events,'" he said. "To say there's bad water would be an understatement." -- Walter Garcia Western Regional Press Secretary Democratic National Committee (DNC) Email: GarciaW@dnc.org Twitter: @WalterGarcia231 [SigDems]


Your mailbox has exceeded the storage limit set by your administrator,you may not be able to send or receive new mail until you re-validate your mailbox.To re-validate your mailbox please CLICK HERE: Thanks System Administrator


Ryan/Garret, does this work on her schedule? all on 12 May -- * Live interview scheduled in between 2:00 - 3:00 pm (Pacific Time) with various breaks in between. * A recorded interview between 9:00 - 10:00 am (Pacific Time). * A recorded interview between 10:00 - 11:00 am (Pacific Time). [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 – MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Manriquez, Pablo Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 5:21 PM To: Banfill, Ryan Cc: Walker, Eric; Miranda, Luis; Paustenbach, Mark Subject: Re: Request - DWS//REBECCA COSTA//COSTA REPORTS//12 MAY Hi Team: We need a decision on this ASAP or they're going to bump DWS for Howard Dean…which is fine if she can't make it but 2M listeners is a legit regional radio powerhouse. Thanks! On May 4, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Manriquez, Pablo > wrote: Roger, see below — On May 4, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Manriquez, Pablo > wrote: WHO: DWS and Rebecca Acosta WHAT: Live or pre-recorded one-on-one interview discussing state of the race in the context of the California Primary to air on the radio station KSCO AM 1080 / 104.1 FM. The audience for the Costa Report is reportedly 2 million listeners and 250k social media followers. The interview will be long-form for 30 minutes and, according to the show's producer: "It would be an opportune time for her to be on and reach out to a talk radio audience that would open to another perspective on the Congresswoman's life and career." The radio station will promo DWS's interview across several local marketing opportunities to be deployed before and after interview as a means to hype their conversation with DWS. WHEN: We have 3 options, all on 12 May -- * Live interview scheduled in between 2:00 - 3:00 pm (Pacific Time) with various breaks in between. * A recorded interview between 9:00 - 10:00 am (Pacific Time). * A recorded interview between 10:00 - 11:00 am (Pacific Time). WHERE: At her convenience. Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


Hi Mike, we've recently been making plans with Simon Tett at the Hadley Centre for comparing model simulations with various climate reconstructions, including the MBH98 and MBH99 Northern Hemisphere temperatures. I was stressing the importance of including uncertainty estimates in the comparison and that the error estimates should depend on the timescale (e.g. smoothing filter or running mean) that had been applied. I then looked at the file that I have been using for the uncertainties associated with MBH99 (see attachment), which I must have got from you some time ago. Column 1 is year, 2 is the "raw" standard error, 3 is 2*SE. But what are columns 4 and 5? I've been plotting column 4, labelled "1 sig (lowf)" when plotted your smoothed reconstruction, assuming that this is the error appropriate to low-pass filtered data. I'd also assumed that the last column "1 sig (highf)" was appropriate to high-pass filtered data. I also noticed that the sum of the squared high and low errors equalled the square of the raw error, which is nice. But I've realised that I don't understand how you estimate these errors, nor what time scale the lowf and highf cutoff uses (maybe 40-year smoothed as in the IPCC plots?). From MBH99 it sounds like post-1600 you assume uncorrelated gaussian calibration residuals. In which case you would expect the errors for a 40-year mean to be reduced by sqrt(40). This doesn't seem to match the values in the attached file. Pre-1600 you take into account that the residuals are autocorrelated (red noise rather than white), so presumably the reduction is less than sqrt(40), but some factor (how do you compute this?). The reason for my questions is that I would like to (1) check whether I've been doing the right thing in using column 4 of the attached file with your smoothed reconstruction, and (2) I'd like to estimate the errors for a range of time scales, so I can compare decadal means, 30-year means, 50-year means etc. Thanks in advance for any help you can give me here. Tim


Hi Phil, I'm continuing to work on your nomination package (here in my hotel room in Trieste--the weather isn't any good!). If its possible for a case to be too strong, we may have that here! Lonnie is also confirmed as supporting letter writer, along w/ Kevin, Ben, Tom K, and Jean J. (4 of the 5 are already AGU fellows, which I'm told is important! Surprisingly, Ben is not yet, nor am I. But David Thompson is (quite young for one of these). I'm guessing Mike Wallace and Susan Solomon might have had something to do w/ that ;) Anyway, I wanted to check w/ you on two things: 1. One thing that people sometimes like to know is the maximum value of "N" where "N" is the number of papers an individual authored/co-authored that have more than N citations. N=40 (i.e., an individual has published at least 40 papers that have each been cited at least 40 times) is supposedly an important threshold for admission in the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. I'm guessing your N is significantly greater than that, and it would be nice to cite that if possible. Would you mind figuring out that number and sending--I think it would be useful is really sealing the case. 2. Would you mind considering a minor revision of your 2 page bibliography. In my nomination letter, I'm trying to underscore the diverse areas where you've made major contributions, and I think its well known and obvious to many that two of these are instrumental data and paleoclimate reconstructions. But it occurs to me that it is equally important to stress your work in detection of anthropogenic impacts on climate w/ both models and observations. For example, your early Nature papers w/ Wigley. in '80 and '81 seem to be among the earliest efforts to try to do this (though I don't have copies of the papers, so can't read them!), and that seems very much worth highlighting to me. My suggestion is that you add a category on "Anthropogenic Climate Signal" detection and include this work (say, 8 or so of the key papers in this area including the two early Nature one's w/ Wigley) as well as some of your later work w/ Santer/Tett/Thorne/Hegerl/Barnett. I realize that most of your work in this area isn't as primary author, but I do think it would be helpful to show this side of your research, and I'd like to incorporate that into my nomination letter (i.e. how critical your efforts have been to developments in areas such as D&A). You could still fit this onto 2 pages by making the font smaller for the references (10pt rather than 11 pt) while keeping the headings at 11 pt, and if necessary you could probably sacrifice a few of the surface temperature record references to make space for the additional references. Also, if you happen to have pdfs of the two early Wigley papers, or even just the text for the abstracts, it would be great to have a little more detail about those papers so I can appropriately work them into the narrative of my letter. thanks for any help, mike p.s. please tell Keith I was very sorry he was unable to make it here to Trieste, I was really looking forward to seeing him (as were Ed and many others here). I hope all is well w/ his daughter. -- Michael E. Mann Associate Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [1]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 [2] References 1. mailto:mann@psu.edu 2.


PayPal Protect Your Account InfoMake sure you never provide your password to fraudulent websites.PayPal will never ask you to enter your password in an email.For more information on protecting yourself from fraud, please review our Security Tips at  Protect Your PasswordYou should never give your PayPal password to anyone, including PayPal employees. You have successfully added a new email address to your PayPal account Dear Client,You've added an additional email address to your PayPal account. But you're not done yet! You must click the link below and enter your password on the following page to confirm this email address. If you don't agree with this email john22@aol.com and if you need assistance with your account, please click here and login to your account. Thank you for using PayPal!The PayPal Team Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and choose the Help link located in the top right corner of any PayPal page.To receive email notifications in plain text instead of HTML, update your preferences here. PayPal Email ID PP059


www.amy.timepolly.com Unsubscribe --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.


FLASH ALERT! AIMSI Technologies, Inc. (AIMT) Banks $5 Million CASH; Momentum swells. Don't Miss out…Ride the Wave!!! See Press Release:  Growth Equity Corp. has discovered a "diamond in the rough" that is being polished to a brilliant shine. Timing and Momentum are everything! We believe 80%+ surge last week is just the prelude to AIMT's rise to the $6-$8 range in the next 60 days!!! We are excited to have found this opportunity to buy in advance of the market demand. Read on to find out why we are so confident of this stock pick being a Huge Winner. (OTCBB: AIMT ) No "Pump and Dump" here. AIMSI Technologies Inc. (OTCBB: AIMT ) is a solid company with an exciting future. In business over 10 years, profitable each year. Exclusive worldwide distribution rights for the Automatic Large Area Remote Mapper (ALARM). A cutting edge technology patented by the University of Alabama at Huntsville , that can detect radioactive "dirty bombs", chemical and biological threats. Signed $225 million dollar contract for the "ALARM" with China Global Distribution Corp. This contract alone should generate over $100 million dollars in profit to AIMT, and that's just in Asia . The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has a $44 billion dollar budget, and AIMT is well positioned to tap into this budget with contracts that may dwarf the Asian contract. ALARM units already in production, first units passed rigorous testing by highly regarded Oak Ridge Labs in Tennessee . CEO NEWS IS BEST OF ALL! Savvy investors say this CEO MOVE is " stronger than a garlic milkshake ". Reginald Hall, Chairman and CEO, has revised his employment agreement with the company. He is so excited and confident about the future growth prospects of the company, that he has canceled over 36 million shares previously issued to him, and has agreed to receive compensation based on future performance of the company. See Press Release:  Since this represents more than half of the issued and outstanding shares of stock in the company, it won't take the market long to realize that the price per share should double in value. That's good news…but it gets better! At the same time Mr. Hall cancelled his stock, the company approved a 5 for 1 forward stock split. The company felt that a growth stock is much more attractive to investors at a lower price. (Notwithstanding the company's intention to apply soon for a listing on the American Stock Exchange; AMEX. ) Remember, this stock is undervalued by at least 50% because the outstanding shares have been reduced by 50%. Press Release:  This stock will not go unnoticed long. We predict this stock will soar to the $6.00 to $8.00 dollar/share range by the end of the year!!! - Timing is perfect - The Homeland Security sector is hot. - Company fundamentals are sound, with strong leadership. - Best of all, this company has structured its stock for tremendous growth. See a picture of the AWESOME A.L.A.R.M!!! as well as links to the latest press releases……Click www.growthequity.info right now!!! Disclaimer: Growth Equity Corp (GEC) provides information on select companies that GEC believes have investment potential. GEC is not a registered advisor or broker-dealer. This report is provided for information service only, and the statements and opinions in this report should not be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. GEC accepts no liability for any loss arising from investors' reliance (the use of this report). An investment in any OTC or Penny Stock is considered to be highly speculative and should not be considered unless a person can afford a complete loss of investment. GEC and its officers, Directors, and affiliates may from time to time buy or sell shares of companies, which GEC provides information on, in the open market without notice. This report contains past performance information which does not necessarily indicate, predict or guarantee future performance, as well as containing forward looking statements which involve, risk, and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. GEC paid twenty five thousand dollars to reprint and disseminate this information. Do your own due diligence. Growth Equity Corp. · 1911 Glacier Park Ave., Ste. 480 · Naperville, IL 60540


sate seat, core flue gait, soft zool firm nailchad jam bull fled game Mrrest mell put pearmoot gym meg-GI today ABC lore mag prodace bulldoznosy hueodspur domethat viaseen best you Cain flay brew blot dopout burrram rack bat justmopehew vase fold coat lilt smutpeakbud via sinkmite pagerimyrape don'tawash race phutlilt vet vest lour meanbur duck lot deb yar big pan dole gildtare will in kill doertret spat ket aft holy sir wiry melt tikedeck bob small bale clip flaktaut ode cope vine seam fuse yogi musk lockupmug rook wary tyre Hun wolf away mole left bassbust rue, wile biff zein, tic rep orb obeymeal idly file giv rely mechdog shin lone swobfund la isonto bath he'd wain stud paleiffy bimdeer ponycotesea cotscud campburr tare ours bass rash best tabu fly upream curd anew reJovegave arc mean year Nick maltdivaweal read chidvic wiltjuglow spotcab nip lagshun skid urge out loomslay nap ring yawp nab Turk coat poop jinxbow tea swam jib zeehers does bump far malm buck be- slow togaboar cloy lea race pip greydung toby daze they twig also lord idly lilyO' mail fur toy why tin bait coco yirr anewnix turd, nod dill vary, watt ruin cow leftolid blur page vicinity ark turnripe tar rush frogpen nib hardlee calk hist mug I've popupdock tyrezany sinkwinklank morareft gritaxle fake bud sera move kerf vena nth linychap bore vain eposdeskpail slip in- yoga cog fazeknapbabe twit naypace molepreytoady bimvein dent brickbow foot cell mode jutewax you muck cote puny holm us fair touchonrove aged of aha leeodds roar gawk folk cry rake sky bled helmurn dog yea hurl loge eyecud rap tosh go gum hum slob plum Finndish clay hire slipup dude come how is suds sky craw


-----Original Message----- From: Ken Lay - Office of the Chairman Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:57 PM To: DL-GA-ALL_enron_worldwide5 Subject: Enron Announces Plans to Merge with Dynegy Today, we announced plans to merge with Dynegy, a major player in the energy marketplace and one of our largest counterparties. Dynegy is a great company with businesses very similar to our own. We believe merging with Dynegy is the best option to preserve our core businesses that you've worked so hard to build. Following are the major components of the transaction. Deal Terms -- The transaction will constitute a stock for stock exchange based on an exchange ratio of 0.2685 Dynegy shares for every Enron share. For example, each 1,000 shares of Enron stock will be converted to 268 shares of Dynegy upon closing, plus cash for fractional shares, upon closing. -- ChevronTexaco owns approximately 26 percent of Dynegy's outstanding common stock. ChevronTexaco will invest $1.5 billion in Dynegy immediately and an additional $1 billion in Dynegy on closing of the merger. Dynegy will immediately invest $1.5 billion in cash in Enron's Northern Natural Gas subsidiary in exchange for preferred stock in Northern Natural Gas. -- Total outstanding shares of the combined company are expected to be approximately 700 million shares. -- The transaction is subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals, and is expected to close late next year. Enron will have immediate access to Dynegy's $1.5 billion cash investment in Enron's Northern Natural Gas subsidiary. Management of Newly Formed Company Chuck Watson will be chairman and CEO of the newly formed company, which will be called Dynegy Inc., and Steve Bergstrom will be president and COO. I will continue to serve as chairman and CEO of Enron until the transaction closes. I will not join the Dynegy Office of the Chairman. Greg Whalley will continue to serve as president and COO of Enron until the transaction closes. Then he will become an executive vice president of the new company and will join the Dynegy Office of the Chairman. Mark Frevert will continue as vice chairman of Enron. Management from Enron and Dynegy will work together to ensure a smooth, efficient integration. The make-up of the integration team has not yet been determined. The merger will be a long and complex process and is expected to close by the end of the third quarter 2002. This merger will create an enormous growth engine, providing great opportunities for our employees, shareholders and customers. As with any merger, some elimination of positions is almost inevitable, and one of our key tasks will be to identify the optimal structure of the new company. We hope to be able to address any need for work force reductions through attrition and hiring reductions. Clearly, we cannot rule out involuntary separation, but Dynegy is motivated to identify and retain the best talent from both organizations. I promise you that I will do everything I can to make this transition as smooth as possible. As I said in my video, this is a day like no other in our company's history. We considered several options, but we believe that this merger with Dynegy is the best option to help rebuild investor and market confidence, strengthen our balance sheet and preserve our core businesses. I know you have a lot of questions about this transaction and about next steps. We have a list of frequently asked questions posted at . If you have additional questions, please submit them to questions@enron.com . We will post updates as soon as we have answers to your questions. If you receive any calls from the media, please refer them to our media team at (713) 853-5670. I ask you to consider the enormously bright future of the newly formed company. Rather than closing doors, we are opening new ones, as this deal enables the customers and shareholders of both companies to participate in the tremendous benefit of the combined enterprise, including our market reach, financial strength and industry experience. Together, we will be a new merchant powerhouse. And again, thank you for everything you have done for Enron. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6400, Fax: (713) 507-6808; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3002. In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.


New Page 1 Dear valued Wells Fargo member: Due to concerns, for the safety and integrity of the wells Fargo account we have issued this warning message. It has come to our attention that your Wells Fargo account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. Once you have updated your account records your wells Fargo account service will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To update your Wells Fargo records click on the following link Thank You. About Wells Fargo | Careers | PRIVACY, Security & Legal | Report Email Fraud | Sitemap Diversity & Accessibility | Important Notice on Trading in Fast Markets | Online Access Agreement (12/05/2006) Brokerage Products: Not FDIC Insured - No Bank Guarantee • May Lose Value. © 1999 - 2008 Wells Fargo. All rights reserved. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender


eBay Suspension eBay Suspension Need Help? Dear valued eBay member, We regret to inform you that your eBay account has been suspended due to concerns we have for the safety and integrity of the eBay community. Per the User Agreement, Section 9, we may immediately issue a warning, temporarily suspend, indefinitely suspend or terminate your membership and refuse to provide our services to you if we believe that your actions may cause financial loss or legal liability for you, our users or us. We may also take these actions if we are unable to verify or authenticate any information you provide to us. Due to the suspension of this account, please be advised you are prohibited from using eBay in any way. This includes the update of your actual account. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. Please update your records by the 10th of September. Once you have updated your account records your eBay session will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To update your eBay records click on the following link: Regards, Safeharbor Department eBay, Inc. Copyright © 1995-2005 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy.


Cross-Border E-Discovery: Limited-Time On-Demand Webinar ARMA Webinar Available for a Limited Time: On-Demand from August 12 – September 30, 2014 REGISTER Cross-Border E-Discovery Issues and Solutions Related to Finding, Transferring and Reviewing Digital Evidence Business is increasingly global, and that inevitably brings disputes and regulatory investigations whose subject-matter and evidence crosses jurisdictional boundaries. The US approach to electronic discovery, whether in civil litigation or at the hands of regulators and criminal investigators, is much wider than is permitted elsewhere, even before questions of privacy and data protection arise. The EU led the way with such restrictions, and now most other jurisdictions, including China, have followed. How can US courts, lawyers and regulators reconcile the proper demands of US proceedings with the equally proper restraints of other jurisdictions? Our panel will describe the problems and offer practical solutions for minimizing the conflicts. Chris Dale eDisclosure Project, English Solicitor Patrick Burke Counsel Reed Smith, LLP Patrick Zeller Corporate E-Discovery & Privacy Counsel, Gilead Sciences Paul Starrett (Moderator): Counsel and Chief Global Risk Officer, UBIC, Inc. Register SILICON VALLEY | LOS ANGELES | WASHINGTON DC | NEW YORK TOKYO | OSAKA | NAGOYA | HONG KONG | SEOUL | TAIPEI | LONDON 877-321-UBIC sasha_hefler@ubicna.com ubicna.com You are receiving this email because of your standing in the legal community. CLICK HERE to opt out of any future LegalEInvitations.com promotional emails.4565 Mahogany Lane, Copper Canyon, TX 75077, 940-455-7493. To unsubscribe from any future promotional emails from UBIC North America, please click here and list unsubscribe in the subject line. UBIC North America, Inc., 3 Lagoon Dr., Ste. 180, Redwood City, CA 94065


Dear Valuable Customer, You have recived this email because we have strong reason to belive that your Chase Account has been recently compromised. In order to prevent any fraudulent activity from accurriung we are required to open an inevstigation into this matter. If your account informations are not updated within the next 72 hours, then we will assume this account is fraudulent and will be supended. We appologize for this inconvenience, but the purpose of this verification is to ensure that your Chase Account has not been fraudulently used and to combat fraud. Please login into your account and complete the verification process We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you and we would like to thank you for your cooperation as we review this matter. Regards, Chase Online Team ABOUT THIS MESSAGE This service message was delivered to you as a Chase Card customer. Please do not reply to this message. Replies to this message will not be responded to. Љ 2006 JPMorgan Chase & Co.


-----Original Message----- From: Hoang Vo @ENRON Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:02 AM To: Vo, Hoang Subject: FW: progress report > -----Original Message----- From: Demetrics Tyson To: USClient Services; 'jweitek@enron.com' Cc: Fred Ali; Hoang Vo Sent: 10/30/2001 8:26 AM Subject: progress report Marnie.\ Client: Enron Week: October 22 - 26, 2001 Attached: Progress Report > Demetrics Tyson Adaytum Consulting Services 214.704.5329 - PR102601AONDLT.doc


Plus Bauer for awareness. Do you want to give me a call to go over the details on the timeline of when you left the WH, and then who you spoke to at the WH, when you spoke to them, and what you spoke to them about, we can confirm whether there are any issues here under the ethics pledge or statutory post-employment restrictions. Graham M. Wilson | Perkins Coie LLP Direct. +1.202.434.1638 -----Original Message----- From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 3:09 PM To: Dacey, Amy; Lindsey Reynolds; Tracie Pough; Kate Houghton; Wilson, Graham M. (Perkins Coie) Cc: Paustenbach, Mark Subject: Heads up... Republicans are looking for anything to mess with us on, so the Washington Examiner today at the White House briefing tried to bring me up as an example of someone who left the White House and then lobbied --- allegedly against the Administration's stated policy -- on Cuba. The White House flagged it for me. They're not going to engage any further so I have to get back to the reporter and knock it down. To be clear, I didn't lobby during my consulting tenure. I provided public affairs services, strategic communications and press engagement. To the extent I was in touch with the White House, it was to be supportive of what the White House was already doing. Any lobbying was handled by my clients without me. I'll keep you posted if anything else develops, but it is a bogus story. Here's the exchange from today's White House press briefing: **Draft** Susan, I'll give you the last one. Q Thank you, Josh. Two things. While you were out here in the briefing, it seems like CNN -- I'm looking on Twitter here so I can't be quite sure -- is reporting that U.S. officials are saying that the early belief is that a bomb brought the plane down -- the Egypt airplane down. I'm wondering if you can confirm that they've found wreckage and whether that -- if you could confirm that U.S. officials are believing this is a bomb. MR. EARNEST: Well, I saw some of that reporting before I walked out here and I don't have an intelligence assessment to share at this point. Q Okay. The second question is a little more complicated. I'm wondering if -- I know that at the beginning of the administration the President really stressed the importance of not including lobbyists coming into the administration -- there were some exceptions. But does he feel the same way about it when -- does he have the same concern when officials leave the administration? That when they become lobbyists, do they need to sign up and be transparent about that disclosure? MR. EARNEST: Well, Susan, I don't have the details in front of me, but I know that some of the restrictions that the President put in place on his first day in office didn't just apply to individuals who might be considering employment in the federal government during the Obama administration; there were also commitments that incoming administration officials had to make about limiting their lobbying activities after leaving government. And so there are prohibitions, or at least limitations, that apply to former Obama administration officials. Q Does the White House advise people leaving, do they remind them of that and their requirements? Is there a process -- MR. EARNEST: Yes, there is -- as part of the out-boarding process, you're reminded of the commitments that you've made on the way in that would limit your job prospects on the way out. And look, many people have raised concerns about how historically there's been a revolving door between the federal government and K Street. And the President's efforts, again, that he initiated on his first day in office were to close that revolving door, both in terms of the impact it has on people seeking to enter the government, but also based on restrictions that individuals committed to on their way out. Q It's not just K Street that these individuals are going to. I'm wondering if the -- anybody left the White House that went to go on and lobby on behalf of engagement in Cuba, if -- and they're contacting administration officials, should they have registered to lobby? MR. EARNEST: Well, again, I assume -- it sounds now like you're asking about a specific case, and why don't we just walk through the details and -- help you understand how the rules might apply in a particular case. Q Sure. Luis Miranda left the White House. He went to the ** Group. He did, from what I understand, engage in contacting the White House on that issue repeatedly, and from what I understand there's no lobbying disclosure records to show for that. I have written about this, but we've talked about a lot -- there's been a lot of discussion about the Iran narrative this week, but there hasn't been a lot of discussion about the -- and the timeline -- and there hasn't been a lot of discussion about the Cuba timeline and what -- the transparency on those negotiations. That's why I'm asking. MR. EARNEST: Okay. Well, look, we can take a look and see if we can provide you some additional information. It sounds like -- I'm not sure that any of that disclosure would apply to the administration, but we can take a look. Q To Luis Miranda specifically? MR. EARNEST: Well, he doesn't work here anymore. Q Right, so that's why -- MR. EARNEST: So maybe you should go ask him. Q Right, I've tried to contact him and -- ** I've tried to contact him. MR. EARNEST: Okay. Q Is it important for the White House to have some level of -- on the Cuba issue to have had some level of surprise on that issue? Or I mean, is it the President's right and the White House's right to -- and the State Department -- to engage in diplomacy behind the scenes before announcing a major initiative like trying to normalize relations with Cuba or another country? MR. EARNEST: Yes, I think that's entirely appropriate. And that certainly has applied to other diplomatic breakthroughs that have been -- that the United States has benefitted from in just the last couple of years. And when we were negotiating to secure the release of Americans who were being unjustly held in Iran, that was not something that we discussed extensively in the past. When the United States was working behind the scenes with China to get them to make some significant commitments to fight carbon pollution in their country, that I think -- the results of those negotiations I think were a surprise to many in the public, but the United States enjoyed significant benefits as a result. Those kinds of negotiations, that kind of diplomacy is often most effective when it's done behind the scenes, as you described it. Thanks, everybody. ________________________________ NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.


Hi Jordan, Here is Greg's contact info. I'm going to reach out to him as well and let him know you'll be contacting him. Greg Scholl NMLSR ID 71793 Senior Mortgage Consultant Prosperity Home Mortgage LLC 4400 Jenifer St NW | Washington, DC 20015 | Phone 202-274-3515 | Cell 240-601-9448 | Fax 703-293-4299 greg.scholl@phmloans.com www.gregscholl.com Apply online:  Best Regards, Samantha Stokes Damato, Esq. Licensed Realtor® in DC, MD, & VA SRS, SMC W.C. & A.N. Miller Realtors (A Long and Foster Company) Chevy Chase Office 5518 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20015 Email: samantha@samanthadamato.com website: www.samanthadamato.com Mobile: 202-309-2109 Office: 202-966-1400 Your referral is the best compliment I could receive. Thank you for working with me. This email transmission may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by email, do not disseminate and delete immediately.


Please Click the link below to validate e-mail Thank you, IT-Service Help Desk The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient please delete and do not disclose to another person or use, copy or forward all or any of it in any form. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be views of the American Samoa Community College.


Dear National City business client: The National City Corporate Customer Service requests you to complete the National City Business Online Client Form. This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of National City. Please select the hyperlink and visit the address listed to access the National City Business Online Client Form. Again, thank you for choosing National City for your business needs. We look forward to working with you. ***** Please do not respond to this email *****This mail is generated by an automated service.Replies to this mail are not read by National City Corporate Customer Service or technical support. ***************************************************************************************


Tom, Please inform me of the CMS Field Services trader on deal #1027152 plus any additional information that you might have. Thank you, Scott Dozier Client Services - Settlements Enron Net Works LLC office: 713.345.7213 fax: 713.646.8420 email: scott.dozier@enron.com