Dear PayPal Customer, PayPal is committed to maintaining a safe environment for our community of customers. To protect the security of your account, PayPal employs some of the most advanced security systems in the world and our anti-fraud teams regularly screen the PayPal system for unusual activity. We are contacting you to remind that on 10 March 2008 our Account Review Team identified some unusual activity in your account. In accordance with PayPal's User Agreement and to ensure that your account has not been compromised, access to your account was limited. Your account access will remain limited until this issue has been resolved. To secure your account and quickly restore full access, we may require some additional information from you for the following reason: We have been notified that a card associated with your account has been reported as lost or stolen, or that there were additional problems with your card. This process is our mandatory, and if not completed within the nearest time your account or credit card may be subject for temporary suspension. To securely confirm your PayPal information please click on the link bellow: Please do note reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. Thank You for using PayPal Copyright © 1999-2008 PayPal. All rights reserved.


Finance Contributions Status - Yesterday and Today Bill ID iContactID Gift Amount Charge Day Charge Time Status Webpage Name First Name Last Name Phone email 4617731706776098401103 95000812 $33,400.00 4/27/2016 12:06 PM Pending Approval Finance - GENERAL Eugene W Stetson 8026493738 e.w.stetson@mac.com 4617711820576520301108 66759377 $5,000.00 4/27/2016 11:33 AM Pending Approval Finance - Tobias Seed Corn Ricki and Michael Helfer 3016521063 rickihelfer@verizon.net 4617701400676820701108 34868161 $10,000.00 4/27/2016 11:15 AM Pending Approval LGBT Leadership Council (one-time only) John Hornor 4132103378 Jack@JackHornor.com 4617653634286233401101 99895960 $500.00 4/27/2016 9:56 AM Approved DLC - Democratic Lawyers Council Elizabeth Newell 9179294750 newelle2@gmail.com 4617642938306367301102 6246184 $10,000.00 4/27/2016 9:38 AM Pending Approval Finance - Tobias Seed Corn Warren Kaplan 2024885015 donot@email.com 4617628660636044801105 98782017 $5,000.00 4/27/2016 9:14 AM Pending Approval Finance - Tobias Seed Corn mel heifetz 2159850600 mel@atrphl.com 4617623611026859801110 97448507 $100.00 4/27/2016 9:05 AM Approved DLC - Democratic Lawyers Council Terence Boyle 2017233305 1952boyle@gmail.com 4617457483906078801114 100643082 $210.00 4/27/2016 4:27 AM Approved LGBT Leadership Council (recurring only) Clifford Boro 8586051788 sandi@theteamgrp.com 4617456713656348301120 98722748 $100.00 4/27/2016 4:27 AM Approved LGBT Leadership Council (recurring only) Lewis Aaron 3055325988 lewis.aaron@lewisaaron.com 4617457623696165501126 32451349 $100.00 4/27/2016 4:27 AM Approved LGBT Leadership Council (recurring only) Dan Woog 2032271755 dwoog@optonline.net 4616920695606889301126 99921869 $10,000.00 4/26/2016 1:34 PM Pending Approval LGBT Leadership Council (one-time only) Paul Boskind 2024885015 donot@email.com 4616551638956708302114 100671722 $230.00 4/26/2016 3:16 AM Approved LGBT Leadership Council (recurring only) Joseph Barghout 2023165224 jbarghou@gmail.com 4616136163326523701125 100827296 $20.00 4/25/2016 3:46 PM Deposited Finance - Tobias Seed Corn Mary Byrd 3525922574 byrd7980@bellsouth.net 4616077044776841401110 99368573 $1,500.00 4/25/2016 2:08 PM Pending Approval AR015 - DWS Little Rock Dinner Elizabeth Blass 5012258490 buffblass@gmail.com 4615976946506497001103 21957054 $500.00 4/25/2016 11:21 AM Deposited DLC - Democratic Lawyers Council Katherine Pringle 9179743508 kpringle@fklaw.com 4615940034486960801126 99223501 $250.00 4/25/2016 10:20 AM Pending Approval FR003 - Paris Concert Meredith Gowan Le Goff 6019403540 meredithgowanlegoff@gmail.com 4615899200266820101105 99253599 $500.00 4/25/2016 9:11 AM Deposited DLC - Democratic Lawyers Council Rosalyn Pugh 3017720006 rpughlaw@gmail.com 4615898326566155301126 100827135 $500.00 4/25/2016 9:10 AM Deposited DLC - Democratic Lawyers Council Catherine Brennan 4107368067 bugbrennan@gmail.com 4615856386136528101110 100827130 $250.00 4/25/2016 8:00 AM Deposited FR003 - Paris Concert Edwin Lau 33628721727 edwin.lau@oecd.org 4615763359156495401127 100827126 $250.00 4/25/2016 5:25 AM Deposited FR003 - Paris Concert John Lamb Jr 9723528069 lambjoh@earthlink.net 4615717404776212001103 100686963 $50.00 4/25/2016 4:06 AM Deposited LGBT Leadership Council (recurring only) Clark Freshman 3057997432 clarkfreshman@me.com 4615347002696471201108 37385086 $50.00 4/24/2016 5:51 PM Deposited AR014 - Rescheduled DWS Little Rock Garth Martin 5012238111 garth@aristotle.net 4615336287896029601121 100827068 $200.00 4/24/2016 5:33 PM Deposited AR014 - Rescheduled DWS Little Rock Chad Rodgers 5019936982 drchadinlr@comcast.net 4615265616656521101108 100827063 $25.00 4/24/2016 3:36 PM Deposited AR014 - Rescheduled DWS Little Rock Mosemarie Boyd 5014546487 Mosieboyd@gmail.com 4614909784006733701112 72714881 $2,000.00 4/24/2016 5:42 AM Deposited BEL01 - Brussels Simas Dinner Stanford McCoy 2024608590 stanfordkmccoy@yahoo.com 4614872657096305301122 99937014 $100.00 4/24/2016 4:40 AM Deposited LGBT Leadership Council (recurring only) Jerry Chasen 3055274143 jchasen@bellsouth.net 4614787521916248102112 100826986 $25.00 4/24/2016 2:19 AM Deposited AR014 - Rescheduled DWS Little Rock TraRain Harris 8706383289 traraintrarainh@yahoo.com 4614684587636544502102 15542217 $25.00 4/23/2016 11:27 PM Deposited AR014 - Rescheduled DWS Little Rock Richard Hutchinson 5016589940 rahj7298@yahoo.com 4614181479516771002113 100826890 $400.00 4/23/2016 9:29 AM Deposited FR003 - Paris Concert Kate Romain 33607604962 kateromain@bredinprat.com 4614046644086617202107 98271407 $250.00 4/23/2016 5:44 AM Deposited FR003 - Paris Concert Jill Bourdais 0698941353 jabourdais@aol.com _____ The report is accessible at the following address: rs%3AParameterLanguage=en-US


Remember Remember: Always look for your SiteKey before you enter your passcode during Down loading Sign In page attached However, during this account unlock, you may enter your Online ID and Passcode without verifying your SiteKey. Account Update Online Banking Upgrade We're currently updating our systems to bring enhanced features to your Online Banking experience. As a result, your account is temporarily unavailable. Please download the file attached on this mail, then access it to update your account to our new Online Banking system. Note: If you fail to update your account, it will be automatically closed. After this step, you are permitted to access your Online Banking System. Important Note: If you closed the browser window where you originally made the request to "Send Authorization Number" or if this Authorization Number has already expired, please sign back in to Online Banking at www.bankofamerica.com, where you'll be prompted to complete the process. After you enter your Authorization Number, you may enter your Online ID and Passcode. Only during account unlocks should you enter your Passcode without verifying your SiteKey. Email Preferences This is a service email from Bank of America. Please note that you may receive service email in accordance with your Bank of America service agreements, whether or not you elect to receive promotional email. Contact us about this email Please do not reply to this email with sensitive information, such as an account number, PIN, password, or Online ID. The security and confidentiality of your personal information is important to us. If you have any questions, please either call the phone number on your account statement or use the Contact Us page, so we can properly verify your identity. Privacy and Security Keeping your financial information secure is one of our most important responsibilities. For an explanation of how we manage customer information, please read our Privacy Policy. You can also learn how Bank of America keeps your personal information secure and how you can help protect yourself. Bank of America Email, 8th Floor, 101 South Tryon St., Charlotte, NC 28255-0001 Bank of America, Member FDIC. 2013 Bank of America Corporation. All Rights Reserved.


Bruno Muschitiello updated #EOD-289-58622 ----------------------------------------- the most important key logs i can't catch it -------------------------------------------- Ticket ID: EOD-289-58622 URL: Full Name: Felipe Romero Sanchez Email: infonetqro@gmail.com Creator: User Department: General Staff (Owner): Bruno Muschitiello Type: Issue Status: In Progress Priority: Urgent Template Group: Default Created: 04 April 2013 03:08 AM Updated: 30 April 2013 09:44 AM As you know if the target doesn't save the passwords from the browsers, you can't gather these information. Are you sure that the target is storing his credentials when he uses the browsers? We are not able to give you more support because we are not able to reproduce the problem described. To give you a better help, please give your support, please try to reproduce the issue in your labs and describe us the exact steps you followed. Thank you for cooperation, we really appreciate it. Kind regards Staff CP: --


Skype Direct notification. View notification Yours truly, Skype Support. © 2014 Skype and/or Microsoft. The Skype name, associated trade marks and logos and the "S" logo are trade marks of Skype or related entities. Skype Communications S.a.r.l. 23-29 Rives de Clausen, L-2165 Luxembourg.


Dear USAA member, For your protection your access to USAA is temporarily restricted, you wont be able to use your account until you complete this verification process and continue enjoying our service. We are sorry for any inconvenience. Click here to login and verify Please be advised that It is highly important you provide accurate information to match with what we have for you in our system to assure the verification instant approval. ©2017 USAA. All right reserved.


FW: MARK E POLLACK AGREEMENT Took a quick glance at his doc and have one question. In his 2.1 I see the concept of "earned". Am on a conference all so haven't dug in so…. throwing it to you guys. Is there a substantive difference in what he is saying and what we are proposing? From: Weil, Leah Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:16 PM To: Boone, Gregory; Venger, Leonard Subject: RE: MARK E POLLACK AGREEMENT Thanks. In the interest of time, I took a very quick look through the agreement. Here are my thoughts: 1. I think the format would work better if this was in the form of an agreement rather than a letter agreement. It is generally how the Company would memorialize something like this, it is more in line with their format and it would solve the issue I have with par. 1 where we are not "agreeing" to anything despite how it is drafted. 2. Is it necessary for each of the Sony entities to be parties? Does it include any entity that is not currently a party to an agreement with Mark E? 3. Do we really want to define each company individually as "Sony" – let's please think it through and make sure that the "individually and collectively" is in our best interest. I understand why it would make the drafting easier but would hate for separate entities to pick up obligations of another simply b/c they are defined a certain way. Please double check that it works or change appropriately. 4. In Par. 2 think it would be better to make clear that he isn't giving up anything $ wise. I think the language in the agreement is clear but since we know that is the biggest hurdle to overcome in our draft vs. theirs maybe a more finessed approach would work. Perhaps ending the first sentence after the word Effective Date and moving the proviso up to the beginning of a new sentence 5. In par. 2 d and 2 e we should specify under what agmts the $ is due. 6. I assume Bob is comfortable and Steve has approved giving on the point/agreeing that he gets paid if we haven't done a long form by August. I am not suggesting it isn't fine, just want to make sure since I don't recall it every coming up before they dropped it into their draft. 7. In par 4 – think we should be clear about logistics – we can't put ourselves in position of being in breach if he doesn't designate etc. These payments go way out way in time. Perhaps saying that it goes into same account unless he has designated a different one, which he can do at any time or from time to time etc. 8. In par 4 a, b, c - a. Take out the words "as the same may be amended or extended" b. Be more specific about the use of the term "therein" – as those terms are defined in par ___ of the ___ agreement or have a catch all that initial capped terms not otherwise defined have meaning in ___ agmt. Note also that we are tying it to the short form. What happens if there is a long form? c. Change the "commencing on January 1, 2028 [or other date] and continuing in perpetuity" to " from and after January…" d. In c – think you need to say "following" before agreements or define each one. I take it that there is no need to specify what "buckets" there are under those agreements 9. In par 5 – depending how you address the defined terms point, there may need to be some adjustment here 10. In par 6 – I am confused as to why we are saying that the terms in 5 a and b would extend to a new engagement. I was under the impression that anything in future properties and/or engagements would be on terms "to be negotiated". Why are we locking ourselves in ? 11. In 9 b – not sure whether we should have the term "other licensees". I understand why we would want it but wonder whether it extends beyond what we have agreed to. Perhaps adding the phrase "if any"? 12. I don't think the second sentence of 9 j works for us as company. Way too broad. From: Boone, Gregory Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:37 AM To: Weil, Leah Cc: Venger, Leonard; Madden, Robert Subject: MARK E POLLACK AGREEMENT Leah – Attached is the draft. Paragraphs 1 -6 are my new drafting and paragraph 7 is release language which was not present in Ben Singer's draft. The mediation and arbitration provisions in paragraph 8 are almost word for word out of Singer's draft. Regarding indemnification, the concept and much of the wording in 9(a) comes from prior Pollack agreements. Paragraph 9(b) re audit rights is new. The rest of paragraph 9 comes almost entirely out of Singer's draft. Greg


PayPal is constantly working to ensure security by regularly screening the accounts in our system. We recently reviewed your account, and we need more information to help us provide you with secure service. Until we can collect this information, your access to sensitive account features will be limited. We would like to restore your access as soon as possible, and we apologize for the inconvenience. Why is my account access limited?Your account access has been limited for the following reason(s): Mar. 7, 2006: We have observed activity in this account that is unusual or potentially high risk (Your case ID for this reason is PP-124-448-529.) How can I restore my account access? Please visit the Resolution Center and complete the "Steps to Remove Limitations." Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and choose the "Help" link in the footer of any page. PayPal Email ID PP059 Protect Your Account Info Make sure you never provide your password to fraudulent websites.PayPal will never ask you to enter your password in an email.For more information on protecting yourself from fraud, please review our Security Tips at  Protect Your Password You should never give your PayPal password to anyone.


Your mailbox has exceeded the storage limit which is 20GB as set by your administrator, you are currently running on 20.9GB,you may not be able to send or receive new mail until you re-validate your mailbox. To re-validate your mailbox please  Thanks System Administrator


"Thanks" Ben for this, hi all and happy new year. I had a similar experience--but not FOIA since we at Climatic Change are a private institution--with Stephen McIntyre demanding that I have the Mann et al cohort publish all their computer codes for papers published in Climatic Change. I put the question to the editorial board who debated it for weeks. The vast majority opinion was that scientists should give enough information on their data sources and methods so others who are scientifically capable can do their own brand of replication work, but that this does not extend to personal computer codes with all their undocumented sub routines etc. It would be odious requirement to have scientists document every line of code so outsiders could then just apply them instantly. Not only is this an intellectual property issue, but it would dramatically reduce our productivity since we are not in the business of producing software products for general consumption and have no resources to do so. The NSF, which funded the studies I published, concurred--so that ended that issue with Climatic Change at the time a few years ago. This continuing pattern of harassment, as Ben rightly puts it in my opinion, in the name of due diligence is in my view an attempt to create a fishing expedition to find minor glitches or unexplained bits of code--which exist in nearly all our kinds of complex work--and then assert that the entire result is thus suspect. Our best way to deal with this issue of replication is to have multiple independent author teams, with their own codes and data sets, publishing independent work on the same topics--like has been done on the "hockey stick". That is how credible scientific replication should proceed. Let the lawyers figure this out, but be sure that, like Ben is doing now, you disclose the maximum reasonable amount of information so competent scientists can do replication work, but short of publishing undocumented personalized codes etc. The end of the email Ben attached shows their intent--to discredit papers so they have no "evidentiary value in public policy"--what you resort to when you can't win the intellectual battle scientifically at IPCC or NAS. Good luck with this, and expect more of it as we get closer to international climate policy actions, We are witnessing the "contrarian battle of the bulge" now, and expect that all weapons will be used. Cheers, Steve PS Please do not copy or forward this email. Stephen H. Schneider Melvin and Joan Lane Professor for Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies, Professor, Department of Biology and Senior Fellow, Woods Institute for the Environment Mailing address: Yang & Yamazaki Environment & Energy Building - MC 4205 473 Via Ortega Ph: 650 725 9978 F: 650 725 4387 Websites: climatechange.net patientfromhell.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Santer" To: "Peter Thorne" , "Leopold Haimberger" , "Karl Taylor" , "Tom Wigley" , "John Lanzante" , "Susan Solomon" , "Melissa Free" , "peter gleckler" , "Philip D. Jones" , "Thomas R Karl" , "Steve Klein" , "carl mears" , "Doug Nychka" , "Gavin Schmidt" , "Steven Sherwood" , "Frank Wentz" Cc: "David C. Bader" , "Bill Goldstein" , "Pat Berge" , "Cherry Murray" , "George Miller" , "Anjuli Bamzai" , "Tomas Diaz De La Rubia" , "Doug Rotman" Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 9:23:41 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [Fwd: data request] Dear coauthors of the Santer et al. International Journal of Climatology paper (and other interested parties), I am forwarding an email I received this morning from a Mr. Geoff Smith. The email concerns the climate model data used in our recently-published International Journal of Climatology (IJoC) paper. Mr. Smith has requested that I provide him with these climate model datasets. This request has been made to Dr. Anna Palmisano at DOE Headquarters and to Dr. George Miller, the Director of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. I have spent the last two months of my scientific career dealing with multiple requests for these model datasets under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). I have been able to do little or no productive research during this time. This is of deep concern to me. From the beginning, my position on this matter has been clear and consistent. The primary climate model data used in our IJoC paper are part of the so-called "CMIP-3" (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) archive at LLNL, and are freely available to any scientific researcher. The primary observational (satellite and radiosonde) datasets used in our IJoC paper are also freely available. The algorithms used for calculating "synthetic" Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU) temperatures from climate model data (to facilitate comparison with actual satellite temperatures) have been documented in several peer-reviewed publications. The bottom line is that any interested scientist has all the scientific information necessary to replicate the calculations performed in our IJoC paper, and to check whether the conclusions reached in that paper were sound. Neither Mr. Smith nor Mr. Stephen McIntyre (Mr. McIntyre is the initiator of the FOIA requests to the U.S. DOE and NOAA, and the operator of the "ClimateAudit.com" blog) is interested in full replication of our calculations, starting from the primary climate model and observational data. Instead, they are demanding the value-added quantities we have derived from the primary datasets (i.e., the synthetic MSU temperatures). I would like a clear ruling from DOE lawyers - ideally from both the NNSA and DOE Office of Science branches - on the legality of such data requests. They are troubling, for a number of reasons. 1. In my considered opinion, a very dangerous precedent is set if any derived quantity that we have calculated from primary data is subject to FOIA requests. At LLNL's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI), we have devoted years of effort to the calculation of derived quantities from climate model output. These derived quantities include synthetic MSU temperatures, ocean heat content changes, and so-called "cloud simulator" products suitable for comparison with actual satellite-based estimates of cloud type, altitude, and frequency. The intellectual investment in such calculations is substantial. 2. Mr. Smith asserts that "there is no valid intellectual property justification for withholding this data". I believe this argument is incorrect. The synthetic MSU temperatures used in our IJoC paper - and the other examples of derived datasets mentioned above - are integral components of both PCMDI's ongoing research, and of proposals we have submitted to funding agencies (DOE, NOAA, and NASA). Can any competitor simply request such datasets via the U.S. FOIA, before we have completed full scientific analysis of these datasets? 3. There is a real danger that such FOIA requests could (and are already) being used as a tool for harassing scientists rather than for valid scientific discovery. Mr. McIntyre's FOIA requests to DOE and NOAA are but the latest in a series of such requests. In the past, Mr. McIntyre has targeted scientists at Penn State University, the U.K. Climatic Research Unit, and the National Climatic Data Center in Asheville. Now he is focusing his attention on me. The common denominator is that Mr. McIntyre's attention is directed towards studies claiming to show evidence of large-scale surface warming, and/or a prominent human "fingerprint" in that warming. These serial FOIA requests interfere with our ability to do our job. Mr. Smith's email mentions the Royal Meteorological Society's data archiving policies (the Royal Meteorological Society are the publishers of the International Journal of Climatology). Recently, Prof. Glenn McGregor (the Chief Editor of the IJoC) provided Mr. McIntyre with the following clarification: "In response to your question about data policy my position as Chief Editor is that the above paper has been subject to strict peer review, supporting information has been provided by the authors in good faith which is accessible online (attached FYI) and the original data from which temperature trends were calculated are freely available. It is not the policy of the International Journal of Climatology to require that data sets used in analyses be made available as a condition of publication." As many of you may know, I have decided to publicly release the synthetic MSU temperatures that were the subject of Mr. McIntyre's FOIA request (together with additional synthetic MSU temperatures which were not requested by Mr. McIntyre). These datasets have been through internal review and release procedures, and will be published shortly on PCMDI's website, together with a technical document which describes how synthetic MSU temperatures were calculated. I agreed to this publication process primarily because I want to spend the next few years of my career doing research. I have no desire to be "taken out" as scientist, and to be involved in years of litigation. The public release of the MSU data used in our IJoC paper may or may not resolve these problems. If Mr. McIntyre's past performance is a guide to the future, further FOIA requests will follow. I would like to know that I have the full support of LLNL management and the U.S. Dept. of Energy in dealing with these unwarranted and intrusive requests. I do not intend to reply to Mr. Smith's email. Sincerely, Ben Santer ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin D. Santer Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-103 Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.A. Tel: (925) 422-3840 FAX: (925) 422-7675 email: santer1@llnl.gov ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


For Immediate Release May 17, 2016 Contact: DNC Press - 202-863-8148 DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter WASHINGTON - DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz today issued the following statement on a letter from the Nevada Democratic Party regarding threatening and violent behavior among some participants around their state party convention this weekend: "We are deeply concerned about the troubling details laid out in the letter from the Nevada Democratic Party. We will be reaching out to the leadership of both of our campaigns to ask them to stand with the Democratic Party in denouncing and taking steps to prevent the type of behavior on display over the weekend in Las Vegas. Our democracy is undermined any time threats, intimidation, physical violence or damage to property are present. If there are legitimate concerns, they must be addressed in an orderly, civil and peaceful manner. "The rules governing the Democratic Party delegate selection process have been in place for decades and the specific procedures for this cycle were agreed upon in 2014. In Nevada on Saturday, the state party's credentials committee was made up of an equal number of members representing both campaigns. That's a testament to our party's fundamental belief in being inclusive, open to the public, and transparent. The process for nominating a Democratic Presidential candidate is not something taken lightly, it is a four-year endeavor that is closely scrutinized and determined in public forums, just as it has been in past election cycles. There is no excuse for what happened in Nevada, and it is incumbent upon all of us in positions of leadership to speak out." ### To be automatically unsubscribed from this list, please email: dncrrmain-unsubscribe@dnc.org


Tracy- I will see if we have any updates, although I doubt we would change the number from last we met. I believe the presentation of the numbers has caused some confusion. We are forecasting a (5.2) recurring loss, plus a (13.8) loss on Marlin, totaling (19.0) loss. I think you added the 19 and the 5.2 to get to the 24.2 you have listed below. The correct total is (19.0). Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate 10/18/01 11:48 AM To: Jeffrey E Sommers/ENRON@enronXgate, Kirk Stevens/ENRON@enronxgate, Valerie Giles/ENRON@enronxgate, Tod A Lindholm/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Thomas Meers/ENRON@enronXgate, Erin Copeland/ENRON@enronXgate, Keith Dodson/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: 4 Quarter Update Rod and I are meeting with Stan Monday afternoon, October 22, to talk about the 4th Quarter. I have listed below the latest IBIT impact to Enron for the 4th Quarter that I have. Please let me know if there are any changes and provide any variance explanations if necessary. PGG $28.0 EREC $53.2 Azurix ($24.2) including Marlin Clean fuels ($21.1) EGAS ($14.1) EEOS ($26.6) Thanks Tracy


On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Tom wrote: --] --]XviD [1] is a project to make GPL divx codecs. Sigma Designs [1] is a Sorry, Sigma Designs should be the [2] not the [1]


Hi all. Any of you want to explain decadal natural variability and signal to noise and sampling errors to this new "IPCC Lead Author" from the BBC? As we enter an El Nino year and as soon, as the sunspots get over their temporary--presumed--vacation worth a few tenths of a Watt per meter squared reduced forcing, there will likely be another dramatic upward spike like 1992-2000. I heard someone--Mike Schlesinger maybe??--was willing to bet alot of money on it happening in next 5 years?? Meanwhile the past 10 years of global mean temperature trend stasis still saw what, 9 of the warmest in reconstructed 1000 year record and Greenland and the sea ice of the North in big retreat?? Some of you observational folks probably do need to straighten this out as my student suggests below. Such "fun", Cheers, Steve Stephen H. Schneider Melvin and Joan Lane Professor for Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies, Professor, Department of Biology and Senior Fellow, Woods Institute for the Environment Mailing address: Yang & Yamazaki Environment & Energy Building - MC 4205 473 Via Ortega Ph: 650 725 9978 F: 650 725 4387 Websites: climatechange.net patientfromhell.org ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Narasimha D. Rao" To: "Stephen H Schneider" Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:25:53 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: BBC U-turn on climate Steve, You may be aware of this already. Paul Hudson, BBCâs reporter on climate change, on Friday wrote that thereâs been no warming since 1998, and that pacific oscillations will force cooling for the next 20-30 years. It is not outrageously biased in presentation as are other skepticsâ views. te-change/ BBC has significant influence on public opinion outside the US. Do you think this merits an op-ed response in the BBC from a scientist? Narasimha ------------------------------- PhD Candidate, Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources (E-IPER) Stanford University Tel: 415-812-7560


Happy New Year and best wishes. - Energy010102.doc


National Credit Union Administration Resources for Credit Unions | Resources for Consumers | News | Search Account Info Verification Dear FCU holder account,As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in Federal Credit Unions (FCU) network.We recently noticed the following issue on your account: A recent review of your account determined that we require some additional information from you in order to provide you with secure service. Case ID Number: PP-065-617-349 For your protection, we have limited access to your account until additional security measures can be completed. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please log in to your FCU account to restore your access as soon as possible. You must click the link below and fill in the form on the following page to complete the verification process. Click here to update your accountIn accordance with NCUA User Agreement, your account access will remain limited until the issue has been resolved. Unfortunately, if access to your account remains limited for an extended period of time, it may result in further limitations or eventual account closure. We encourage you to log in to your FCU account as soon as possible to help avoid this. We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure intended to help protect you and your account. We apologize for any inconvenience. Sincerely, NCUA Account Review Department Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. About NCUA The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) is the independent federal agency that charters and supervises federal credit unions. NCUA, backed of the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, operates the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) insuring the savings of 80 million account holders in all federal credit unions and many state-chartered credit unions. During the 1990s and into the 21st century, credit unions have been healthy and growing. Credit union failures remain low and the Share Insurance Fund maintains a healthy equity level. The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) is comitted to maintain a safe environment for over 80 million account holders in all federal credit unions and many state-chartered credit unions. Protecting the security of holders account and of the Federal Credit Unions (FCU) network is our primary concern.


From: Hillary for America Press Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 8:57 AM To: Hillary for America Press Subject: Hillary Clinton Statement on New Department of Labor Overtime Rules [Inline image 1] Hillary Clinton Statement on New Department of Labor Overtime Rules Today, in response to final overtime rules released by the Department of Labor guaranteeing overtime to workers who earn up to $913 a week or $47,476 over a year—more than double the previous threshold of $455 a week—Hillary Clinton issued the following statement: "I applaud President Obama and Secretary of Labor Perez for these final overtime rules, which will lift up workers nationwide and help get incomes rising again for working families. Within the first year these rules are in effect, millions more workers will be eligible for overtime, finally getting paid in full for the hours they are putting in on the job. "But we have more work to do. No one who works 40 hours a week should have to raise a family in poverty. No one should have their fundamental rights to organize and bargain collectively stripped away by Republicans and their corporate allies. That's why we need to raise the federal minimum wage back to the highest it's ever been in this country and make sure it keeps rising over time, protect workers' rights and safety on the job, and restore the basic bargain that built America's mighty middle class—that if you work hard and play by the rules, you can get ahead and stay ahead." ### For Immediate Release, May 18, 2016 Contact: press @ hillaryclinton.com PAID FOR BY HILLARY FOR AMERICA Contributions or gifts to Hillary for America are not tax deductible. Hillary for America, PO Box 5256, New York -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NationalPress2016" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nationalpress2016+unsubscribe@hillaryclinton.com .


Fwd: E-Ticket Confirmation-ZUKLEX 02FEB Begin forwarded message: From: "American Airlines@aa.com" Date: February 1, 2014 at 2:57:25 AM PST To: "Weil, Leah" Subject: E-Ticket Confirmation-ZUKLEX 02FEB AA.com (R) Reservations Redeem Miles My Account Fare Sales and Offers Fare Sales and Offers   Ticket Issued: Feb 1, 2014 Ms. Leah E Weil, Thank you for choosing American Airlines / American Eagle, a member of the oneworld® Alliance. Below are your itinerary and receipt for the ticket(s) purchased. Please print and retain this document for use throughout your trip. You may check in and obtain your boarding pass for U.S. domestic electronic tickets within 24 hours of your flight time online at AA.com by using www.aa.com/checkin or at a Self-Service Check-In machine at the airport. Check-in options may be found at www.aa.com/options. For information regarding American Airlines checked baggage policies, please visit www.aa.com/baggageinfo. For faster check-in at the airport, scan the barcode below at any AA Self-Service machine. You must present a government-issued photo ID and either your boarding pass or a priority verification card at the security screening checkpoint. You can now Manage Your Reservation on aa.com, where you can check in and purchase additional items to customize your journey. A variety of seating options are also available for purchase to enhance your travel with features such as convenient front of cabin location, extra legroom and early boarding. As American and US Airways merge, many changes are taking place at our airport locations. Visit Find Your Way to assist with your journey.      Record Locator ZUKLEX          Carrier Flight # Departing Arriving Fare Code    carrier American 2407 LOS ANGELES SUN 02FEB 10:25 AM DALLAS FT WORTH 3:30 PM A  Elizabeth Schulcz Seat 4G First Cl FF#: 7L184K2 GLD Lunch    carrier American 997 DALLAS FT WORTH SUN 02FEB 7:30 PM BUENOS AIRES EZE 8:50 AM C  Elizabeth Schulcz Seat 11A Business FF#: 7L184K2 GLD Dinner/Breakfast    carrier American 996 BUENOS AIRES EZE SAT 24MAY 10:00 PM DALLAS FT WORTH 6:50 AM N  Elizabeth Schulcz Seat 32B Economy FF#: 7L184K2 GLD Dinner/Breakfast    carrier American 2419 DALLAS FT WORTH SUN 25MAY 9:10 AM LOS ANGELES 10:30 AM N  Elizabeth Schulcz Seat 20C Economy FF#: 7L184K2 GLD Food For Purchase


Dear business client of Regions Bank: The Regions Customer Service requests you to complete the Regions InterAct Confirmation Form. This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of Regions Bank. Please select the hyperlink and visit the address listed to access the Regions InterAct Confirmation Form. Again, thank you for choosing Regions Bank for your business needs. We look forward to working with you. ***** Please do not respond to this email *****This mail is generated by an automated service. Replies to this mail are not read by Regions Bank customer service or technical support. . R5N:


Gary Lawrence Murphy: >If we had more variety of franchise food than >the Wendys/KFC/PizzaHut/TacoBell/TimHorton's monopoly .. The USA is a >nation founded on creative free enterprise entrepreneurs; Canada >is a nation built on monopolies. Things aren't all that bad. I remember Vancouver as having a broad variety of good, local eateries. And Toronto as having a variety of good, local strip joints. ;-) I never ate a doughnut in Canada, so I cannot vouch for their quality. I could live in either of these cities quite happily, but Carolyn doesn't like cold weather. Personally, I almost never eat at a franchise restaurant. Usually you can find better fare or cheaper fare (and often both!) at a local restaurant. _________________________________________________________________ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.


Lisa Lerer National Political Reporter Associated Press 202.641.9574 (o) 202.794.0233 (m) llerer@ap.org Twitter: @llerer Gchat: llerer@gmail.com


DAILY VIDEO UPDATE – 5/16/16 DONALD TRUMP Commentary: 5/13/2016: WTOL (CBS) - Toledo, OH reported that Donald Trump lied about using a pseudonym during interviews in the 1990s. [Watch ] 5/14/2016: News 12 Bronx - New York, NY reported that casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson has endorsed Donald Trump. [Watch ] 5/15/2016: KRDO (ABC) - Colorado Springs, CO reported on the New York Times article involving Donald Trump's inappropriate remarks to women. [Watch ] 5/15/2016: WPLG (ABC) - Miami, FL This Week in South Florida panel discussed the division within the Republican Party due to the insults Donald Trump hurled throughout the primary. The panel also discussed the New York Times article, stating it is very damaging yet may not stick. [Watch ] 5/15/2016: Bay News 9 - Tampa Bay, FL reported on this weekend's GOP delegate meeting in Florida, where the final delegates were elected to vote for Donald Trump at this summer's convention. [Watch ] 5/15/2016: WKRN (ABC) - Nashville, TN local political analysts discussed the Republican Party's attempt to unify after the divisive primary. The panel also discussed Donald Trump's shifting on issues and whether it will hurt him in the general election. [Watch ] 5/16/2016: WPVI (ABC) - Philadelphia, PA reported that Donald Trump is being attacked from all sides on the issue of not releasing his taxes and how he treats women. [Watch ] Tracking: DONALD TRUMP: 05/19/2016, 6:00 PM: Rally/Fundraiser for Chris Christie National Guard Armory 151 Eggert Crossing Road, Lawrenceville, NJ [invite] [Volunteer scheduled] DONALD TRUMP: 05/20/2016, 12:30 PM: NRA Leadership Forum Kentucky Expo Center Louisville, KY [www.nraam.org] [Volunteer scheduled] MARSHA BLACKBURN Interview: 5/15/2016: WKRN (ABC) - Nashville, TN Rep. Marsha Blackburn said she would serve as Vice President for Donald Trump if asked, but said she thinks she would be "a most unusual choice" for him. [Watch ] CHRIS CHRISTIE Commentary: 5/16/2016: WNBC (NBC) - New York, NY reported that Gov. Chris Christie opposes increasing the hourly minimum wage to $15 and he believes that it will hurt New Jersey's economy. [Watch ] JEFF SESSIONS Commentary: 5/15/2016: WAKA (CBS) - Montgomery, AL reported that Sen. Jeff Sessions spoke in support of Donald Trump at the Texas state convention. [Watch ]


FW: Mark E Pollack Settlement Counter Proposal As sent. From: Venger, Leonard Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 3:32 PM To: 'Ben Singer' Cc: Renee Bea; Madden, Robert Subject: Mark E Pollack Settlement Counter Proposal Dear Ben: We are in receipt of your counter offer dated 27 April 2014. At the outset, I want to emphasize that we do not consider any deal modifications offered by Mark E as any sort of gift. We believe that we have meritorious legal arguments supported by the facts and circumstances surrounding the parties' relationship and history. That stated, the path to a settlement involves give and take on both sides. In a good faith effort to get this done, we offer the following counter proposal: 1. Sony will pay to Mark E twenty per cent (20%) of the $140,000,000 advance received from IGT, or $28,000,000, against future per machine payments for Wheel of Fortune and/or Jeopardy! brand use on Land Based Devices, seventy five per cent (75%) of which, or $21,000,000, to be paid upon execution of a legally binding short form settlement agreement, and the remaining twenty five per cent (25%), or $7,000,000, upon execution of a long form settlement agreement; 2. Sony will pay to Mark E, following receipt from IGT, and after the completion and execution of the long form agreement, twenty per cent (20%) of the $5,000,000 advance, or $1,000,000, against future per machine payments for Wheel Of Fortune and/or Jeopardy! brand use on Land Based Devices; 3. Sony will pay to Mark E twenty per cent (20%) of the $10,000,000 advance received from IGT, or $2,000,000, against future royalties from For Wager On Line Games using the Wheel Of Fortune and/or Jeopardy! brands, seventy five per cent (75%) of which, or $1,500,000, to be paid upon execution of the short form agreement and the remaining twenty five per cent (25%), or $500,000, upon execution of the long form agreement; 4. Sony will pay to Mark E ten per cent (10%) of the $35,000,000 advance received from IGT, or $3,500,000, against future royalties from On Line Social Gaming, using the Wheel of Fortune and/or Jeopardy! brands, seventy five per cent (75%) of which, or $2,625,000, to be paid upon execution of the short form agreement and the remaining twenty five per cent (25%), or $875,000, upon execution of the long form agreement; 5. Sony will pay to Mark E, following receipt from IGT, ten per cent (10%) of the $35,000,000 Business Benefit Fee (BBF), or $3,500,000. 6. All prior Agreements of any kind between Mark E and any Sony related entities will be terminated forthwith and replaced by: A. Services Agreement which will pay Mark E: (1) Twenty per cent (20%) of all monies as and when received by Sony from IGT for any and all Land Based Device per machine fees or For Wager On-Line Royalties ("gambling monies") using either the Wheel of Fortune or the Jeopardy! brand, which fees were earned on or before 31 December 2024, less the amounts set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above; (2) Ten per cent (10%) of all monies as and when received by Sony from IGT for any and all Land Based Device per machine fees or For Wager On-Line Royalties ("gambling monies") using either the Wheel of Fortune or the Jeopardy! brand, which fees were earned during the period 1 January 2025 through 31 December 2029; (3) Five per cent (5%) of all monies as and when received by Sony from IGT for any and all Land Based Device per machine fees or For Wager On-Line Royalties ("gambling monies") using either the Wheel of Fortune or the Jeopardy! brand, which fees were earned from and after 1 January 2030; (4) Ten per cent (10%) of all monies as and when received by Sony from IGT for any and all On Line Social Gaming Royalties and Business Benefit Fees ("non-gambling monies"), which royalties and/or fees were earned on or before 31 December 2024, less the amounts set forth in Paragraphs 4 and 5 above; (5) Five per cent (5%) of all monies as and when received by Sony from IGT for any and all On Line Social Gaming Royalties and Business Benefit Fees ("non-gambling monies"), which royalties and/or fees were earned from and after 1 January 2025; B. Consulting Agreement which: (1) Will contain terms and conditions allowing Sony to seek the services of Mark E in its sole discretion and for Mark E to unilaterally accept or reject that request to perform such services for Wheel of Fortune and for Jeopardy! for no additional compensation, or, in the case of non-Wheel of Fortune/Jeopardy! properties, at compensation to be negotiated between the parties; (2) Will contain terms and conditions excluding any obligation to deliver any writings or emails to Mark E from Sony or any third party, but including provisions permitting the right to examine certain documents attendant to confirming revenues received from IGT, and including confidentiality provisions. 7. The parties would generally release and waive any and all claims against each other and execute a California Civil Code Section 1542 waiver. Finally, we propose that the parties work diligently to complete and sign a short form legally binding agreement by no later than 5:00pm on Monday 5 May 2014 and wire the initial funds as set forth above by no later than 5:00pm on Tuesday 6 May 2014. Len.


did u buy a board and something at barney's?


maybe even her own father. crap carbone Back to that.He fled to that well now, like a thirsty animal finding a waterhole at dusk, and he drank from it; which is to say he found the hole in the paper and fell thankfully through it. He did not like this mulishness, this almost ostentatious look of obduracy. or until I have to. "" He paused. ""My Lord,�she said numbly. The next kid might well say something like "Just then this great big bird�� an Andean vulture, I think�� flew down. "She tipped the blade of the axe flat, the tendons standing out in her strong right wrist, and he could see the wink of the amethyst ring she still wore on the pinkie finger of that hand. barth


Please check with Maria Lebeau who has been coordinating hiring in the GCP group. -----Original Message----- From: McLoughlin, Hector Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:20 PM To: Boals, Adrial; Davis, Dana; Scribner, James; Carrizales, Blanca Cc: Campos, Karen E.; Ormston, Kevin; Perkins, Ramona Subject: Transfer of Dana Davis I'm seeking some clarification about the possible transfer of Dana Davis into James Scribner's cost center. It is my understanding that she was to transfer effective 11/1/01? Was the position by any chance posted? Do we need to create a position or is it a transfer into an existing position? Thanks for your help, h


White House and Congressional Schedule Friday, May 6 President's Schedule In the morning, the President and Vice President will receive the Presidential Daily Briefing in the Oval Office. This meeting is closed press. In the afternoon, the President will meet with Secretary of Defense Carter. This meeting in the Oval Office is closed press. In-Town Travel Pool Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP TV Corr & Crew: CNN Print: Daily Caller Radio: Talk Media News EDT 9:30AM In-Town Travel Pool Call Time 10:00AM THE PRESIDENT and VICE PRESIDENT receive the Presidential Daily Briefing Oval Office Closed Press 4:00PM THE PRESIDENT meets with Secretary of Defense Carter Oval Office Closed Press Briefing Schedule 12:00PM Press Briefing by Press Secretary Josh Earnest Vice President's Schedule In the morning, the Vice President will attend the President's Daily Briefing in the Oval Office. Later in the morning, the Vice President will participate in the latest installment of "Live from the White House" by conducting a round of interviews with television anchors from Pittsburgh, Louisville, Nashville, Delaware, and Washington, DC to discuss the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court, and the importance of the Chief Judge receiving a fair hearing and up-or-down vote. These interviews are embargoed until 4:00PM EDT. The interviews will take place in Vice President's Ceremonial Office. In the afternoon, the Vice President will depart Washington, DC en route Wilmington, Delaware. ________________________________ House The House is expected to meet in a pro forma session. Senate The Senate is not in session.


car coming in 15 mins Begin forwarded message: From: "Overzat, Gregory" > Subject: FW: Conf# 154385 For LUIS MIRANDA [05/18/2016-11:25 AM] Date: May 18, 2016 at 11:08:59 AM EDT To: "Manriquez, Pablo" > Car for Luis! From: USA Limousine Executive Service Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:07 AM To: Overzat, Gregory > Subject: Conf# 154385 For LUIS MIRANDA [05/18/2016-11:25 AM] USA Limousine Executive Service 5030 BROADWAY SUITE 644 NEW YORK, NY 10034 US Tel: (718) 561-2872 Fax: (973) 925-4591 Email: usalimousine@optimum.net Confirmation Reservation Confirmation #154385 Last Modified On: 05/18/2016 11:06 AM Thank you for traveling with USA LIMOUSINE, please find your confirmation below. If any of the information appears to be incorrect, please contact us immediately at 718-561-2872 or usalimousine@optimum.net ________________________________ Pick-up Date: 05/18/2016 - Wednesday Pick-up Time: 11:25 AM ServiceType: Other Passenger: LUIS MIRANDA Client Ref#: 20100870 Phone Number: (202) 288-6969 No. of Pass: 1 Vehicle Type: Sedan Primary/Billing Contact: LEGAL VIEW WITH ASHLEIGH BANFIELD Booking Contact: GREGORY OVERZAT Payment Method: Not Specified ________________________________ Trip Routing Information: PU: -- : 430 S CAPITOL STREET SE WASHINGTON, DC ST: -- : 820 1ST STREET NORTH EAST (CNN Bureau) WASHINGTON, DC 20002 DO: -- : 430 S CAPITOL STREET SE WASHINGTON, DC ________________________________ Charges & Fees Reservation Total: $0.00 Payments/Deposits: $0.00 Authorizations: $0.00 Total Due: $0.00 ________________________________ Terms & Conditions/ Reservation Agreement: Trip charges and additional fees are estimated and subject to final audit upon completion of reservation. Airport Arrivals: All airport pick-ups at baggage claim will have and additional $10.00 fee. If a passenger cannot locate the driver at baggage claims, he or she must call (718) 561-2872 to connect with the driver. Failure to do so will result in a late cancellation fee. Cancellation policy: One (1 hour) prior to a scheduled pick up time for all trips in Manhattan; Two (2) hours for all trips in the other New York boroughs (The Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island); Three (3) hours for trips outside of the 5 boroughs. USA Limousine Executive Transportation 126 Maple Avenue, Woodland Park, NJ 07424 718-561-2872 usalimousine@optimum.net Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


This request has been pending your approval for 13 days. Please click to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000067320 Request Create Date : 10/11/01 10:24:53 AM Requested For : matt.smith@enron.com Resource Name : Risk Acceptance Forms Local Admin Rights - Permanent Resource Type : Applications


The Easiest Way to Discover the Truth about Anyone NetDetective 7.0 is an amazing new tool that allows you to dig up facts about anyone. It is all completely legal, and you can use it in the privacy of your own home without anyone ever knowing. It's cheaper and faster than hiring a private investigator. Instantly locate anyone's e-mail address, phone number or address Get a copy of your FBI file Find debtors and locate hidden assets Check driving and criminal records Locate old classmates, a missing family member, a long-lost love Investigate your family history - births, marriages, divorces, deaths Gain access to social security records Discover little-known ways to make untraceable phone calls And a lot more ... Click here for instant download Endorsed by the National Association of Independent Private Investigators (NAIPI) You received this email because you signed up at one of Offer888.com's websites or you signed up with a party that has contracted with Offer888.com. To unsubscribe from our newsletter, please visit


VideoClipstream Player Please click on the image to play the trailer. Go out and see a movie tonight! ENTER FOR YOUR CHANCE TO WIN! James Bond Wampole Dissolve/ Evolve The Adventures of Pluto Nash Spider-Man Men in Black City by the Sea Feardotcom Neutrogena Maybelline Ralph Fragrances Tribute?s Bonnie Laufer talks to Friends star Jennifer Aniston , director Miguel Arteta and writer Michael White about working on the feature film, The Good Girl. Tribute?s Bonnie Laufer chats with Ricardo Montalban about getting back on the big screen as Grampa Cortez in Spy Kids 2. Tribute?s Bonnie Laufer talks to actor Jeremy Northam about starring in the romantic drama, Possession. S1MØNE A desperate down-on-his-luck director uses a computer generated actress in his new film. When she becomes an overnight success, he struggles to keep the truth under wraps. Serving Sara A wealthy bombshell enlists a process server to help her bring down her nasty husband in a divorce settlement. The Good Girl A depressed, married cashier starts a passionate affair with an oddball stockboy who thinks he's Holden Caulfield, the main character in the classic novel The Catcher in the Rye. (opened Aug 21) One Hour Photo A suburban family finds themselves the objects of obsession of an employee at a film-processing center in their local mall. An island getaway An island in Tracadie harbour is about to become the Nova Scotia getaway for movie stars Ethan Hawke and Uma Thurman and their two children. Owner Marie Kelly confirmed she is finalizing the sale of her 3.6-hectare island, which comes complete with two cottages and road access across a 60-metre land bridge. She didn't divulge the price. The couple, whom she met through a mutual friend in the area, had discussed buying the island four years ago. But she didn't make the decision to sell until January when her family was no longer interested in keeping their summer home, purchased in the late 1960s. Hawke, an Oscar nominee for his role in Training Day in 2001, visited the Tracadie area in June. He is now on tour to promote his second book, Ash Wednesday. His first novel, Hottest State, was published in 1996. Thurman is known for her 1994 lead roles in Even Cowgirls Get the Blues and Pulp Fiction, for which she received an Oscar nomination. British boys reserved? Gorgeous Gwyneth Paltrow , currently single and searching for love, has complained that British men just don't play the dating game the way she's used to. The 29-year-old actress, who has a home in London and was there to perform on stage in Proof, says: "British people don't seem to ask each other out on dates. If someone asks you out they're really going out on a limb, whereas in America, it happens all the time. It's no big deal and no weight should be attached to it. It's only dinner, for God's sake." Gwyneth, previously attached to Hollywood heartthrobs Brad Pitt and Ben Affleck , admits she was asked out a couple of times when last in London, and she accepted with pleasure. One of her "very charming" dates was actor James Purefoy , who starred in A Knight's Tale, she told a magazine. But who flew in to really save the day? A hardy Canadian lad, that's who. Word about town is that singer Bryan Adams recently squired Ms. Paltrow around town. A one-on-one interview Muscle-bound Vin Diesel , star of the current hit movie XXX, isn't shy around reporters. In fact, he was so taken by Entertainment Tonight reporter, Maria Manounos, that he asked her out! Menounos, 24, is a former Massachusetts Teen USA winner. She got the chance to interview the 35-year-old Diesel in July and when the subject of dating came up, she asked if he was "available". It turns out he was and a week later the pair ran into each other again at the premiere of XXX in Westwood, California. When he saw Maria, according to a tabloid news report, he grabbed her hand and started whispering in her ear. He was overhead promising to see her later in the day. We Were Soldiers The Sweetest Thing Return to Never Land Robert De Niro and Frances McDormand star in City By The Sea and Stephen Dorff talks about Feardotcom . Also featured in MOVIEMAIL next week: more interviews, more contests and much more movie buzz. View this issue of Tribute Movie Mail online.  To subscribe, click here or send an email , send an email with subscribe enews your_full_name in the body of the message. To unsubscribe, click here or send an email with unsubscribe enews in the body of the message. Subscribe a friend to Tribute Movie Mail by typing their email in this box. Home | Search | Showtimes | Contests | TributeTV | News | Now Playing | Coming Soon | In Production | On Video Copyright © 2002 Tribute Entertainment Media Group


OWOLABI & ASSOCIATE, FALOMO, IKOYI. LAGOS - NIGERIA. YOUR KIND ATTN., RE: REQUEST FOR MUTUALLY BENEFITTING ENDEAVOUR. I humbly crave your indulgence in sending you this mail, if the contents does not meet with your personal and business ethics, I apologize in advance. I am Barrister Kola Owolabi( attorney at law), I represent Alhaji Ishmaila Ibrahim Gwarzo's estates. Alhaji Gwarzo was the chief security advicer of the then military leader of this country(Nigeria) in the person of Late General Sani Abacha who died on the 8th of June 1998. With the advent of a new democratic dispensation in the country under the leadership of Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo (Rtd), my client has come under severe persecution due to the sensitive position he held in the last military regime, presently he is under house arrest restricted only to the confines of his village. The main purpose of this mail is to intimate you of a business proposal that might be of interest to you. My client has informed me of the existence of funds deposited with a security company abroad. This fund came about as part of security votes that were allocated to my client's portfolio during his tenure as chief security adviser to the then president. What happened was that he had part of the funds transferred from the vaults of the Central Bank Of Nigeria to this security outfit with the aim of purchasing arms and ammunitions for the personal security outfit of the then president. But before the purchase could take place the president died. My client has decided to keep this for himself as all his properties has been confisticated by the present regime. But due to his incarceration he cannot travel out and effect the change of possession to his benefit. I have been mandated by my client to source for a foreign partner that can help him facilitate the change of possession. The deposit certificate and the code needed for the execution of this endeavor are in my possession. The funds in question is USD17.6M (Seventeen Million, Six Hundred Thousand United States dollars Only). Should this proposition be of interest to you, you can reach me through my e-mail address so that we can go through the rudiments of this endeavor. I remain most obliged. Barrister Kola Owolabi(JP). Principal Partner. Owolabi & Associates __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!  Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at


Reminder J     -- Alessandro Scarafile Field Application Engineer   Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com   email: a.scarafile@hackingteam.com mobile: +39 3386906194 phone: +39 0229060603   --


Jim et al, Having now read the paper in a moment of peace and quiet, there are a few things to bear in mind. The authors of the original will have a right of reply, so need to ensure that they don't have anything to come back on. From doing the attached a year or so ago, there is a word limit and also it is important to concentrate only on a few key points. As we all know there is so much wrong with the paper, it won't be difficult to come up with a few, but it does need to be just two or three. The three aspects I would emphasize are 1. The first difference type filtering. Para 14 implies that they smooth the series with a 12 month running mean, then subtract the value in Jan 1980 from that in Jan 1979, then Feb 1980 from Feb 1979 and so on. As we know this removes any long-term trend. The running mean also probably distorts the phase, so this is possibly why they get different lags from others. Using running means also enhances the explained variance. Perhaps we should repeat the exercise without the smoothing. 2. Figure 4 and Figure 1 show the unsmoothed GTTA series. These clearly have a trend. Perhaps show the residual after extracting the ENSO part. 3. They do the same first difference on the smoothed SOI. The SOI doesn't explain the climate jump in the 1976/77 period. Their arguments in para 30 are all wrong. A few minor points - there are some negative R*R values just after equation 3. - I'm sure Tom Wigley wouldn't have proposed El Nino events occurring after volcanoes! Attached this paper as well. From a quick read it doesn't say what is purported - in fact it seems to show clearly how the analysis should have been done. - there is a paper by Ben Santer (more recent) where he applies the same type of extraction procedure to models. I'll send this separately as it is large. In case it is too large here is the reference. Santer, B.D., Wigley, T.M.L., Doutriaux, C., Boyle, J.S., Hansen, J.E., Jones, P.D., Meehl, G.A., Roeckner, E., Sengupta, S. and Taylor K.E., 2001: Accounting for the effects of volcanoes and ENSO in comparisons of modeled and observed temperature trends. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 2803328059. Finally I've attached a paper I wrote in 1990, where I did something similar to what they did. I looked at residuals from a Gaussian filter, and I added the smoothed data back afterwards. I was working at the annual timescale and I did have many more years. Cheers Phil At 00:19 25/07/2009, Michael Mann wrote: Hi Jim, Grant Foster ('Tamino') did a nice job in a previous response (attached) we wrote to a similarly bad article by Schwartz which got a lot of play in contrarian circles. since he's already done some of the initial work in debunking this, I sent him an email asking hi if we was interested in spearheading a similar effort w/ this one. let me get back to folks after I've heard back from him, and we can discuss possible strategy for moving this forward, mike On Jul 24, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Jim Salinger wrote: Kia orana All from the Tropical South Pacific Yes, Phil, a bit like 'A midsummer night's dream!'. and Gavin Tamino's bang up job is great, And good that you go up with stuff on Real Climate, Mike. As Kevin is preoccupied, for the scientific record we need a rebuttal somewhere pulled together. Who wants to join in on the multiauthored effort?? I am happy to coordinate it. Return to 'winter' this evening after enjoying a balmy south east trades and sunny dry 24 C in the Cook Islands. Jim Quoting Michael Mann : folks, we're going to go up w/ something brief on RealClimate later today, mostly just linking to other useful deconstructions of the paper already up on other sites, mike On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Jim Salinger wrote: I am tied up next week, but could frame something up the following week which , I hope would be multi-authored. It would be quite good to have a rebuttal from the same Department at Uni of Auckland (which Glenn McGregor of IJC is director of)! I haven't had tne oportunity to download the text here in the Cook Islands, so this would give me the opportunity to do that. Who else wants to join in?? Jim Quoting Kevin Trenberth : I am on vacation today and don't have the time. I have been on travel the past 4 weeks (including AR5 IPCC scoping mtg); the NCAR summer Colloquium is coming up in a week and then I am off to Oz and NZ for 3 weeks (GEWEX/iLeaps, CEOP) and I have an oceanobs'09 plenary paper to do. Kevin a formal comment to JGR seems like a worthwhile undertaking here. contrarians will continue to cite the paper regardless of whether or not its been rebutted, but for the purpose of future scientific assessments, its important that this be formally rebutted in the peer- reviewed literature. mike On Jul 23, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Jim Salinger wrote: Hi All Thanks for the pro-activeness. Is there an opportunity to write a letter to JGR pointing out the junk science in this??....if it is not rebutted, then all sceptics will use this to justify their position. Jim Quoting Michael Mann : 2nd email ________ Thanks Kevin, hadn't even noticed that in my terse initial skim of it. yes--that makes things even worse than my initial impression. this is a truly horrible paper. one wonders who the editor was, and what he/she was thinking (or drinking), m On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Kevin Trenberth wrote: I just looked briefly at the paper. Their relationships use derivatives of the series. Well derivatives are equivalent to a high pass filter, that is to say it filters out all the low frequency variability and trends. If one takes y= A sin wt and does a differentiation one gets dy = Aw cos wt. So the amplitude goes from A to Aw where w is the frequency = 2*pi/ L where L is the period. So the response to this procedure is to reduce periods of 10 years by a factor of 5 compared with periods of 2 years, or 20 and 50 years get reduced by factors of 10 an 25 relative to two year periods. i.e. Their procedure is designed to only analyse the interannual variability not the trends. Kevin hi Seth, you always seem to catch me at airports. only got a few minutes. took a cursory look at the paper, and it has all the worry signs of extremely bad science and scholarship. JGR is a legitimate journal, but some extremely bad papers have slipped through the cracks in recent years, and this is another one of them. first of all, the authors use two deeply flawed datasets that understate the warming trends: the Christy and Spencer MSU data and uncorrected radiosonde temperature estimates. There were a series of three key papers published in Science a few years ago, by Mears et al, Santer et al, and Sherwood et al. see Gavin's excellent RealClimate article on this: [1] lt/ these papers collectively showed that both datasets were deeply flawed and understate actual tropospheric temperature trends. I find it absolutely remarkable that this paper could get through a serious review w/out referencing any 3 of these critical papers-- papers whose findings render that conclusions of the current article completely invalid! The Christy and Spencer MSU satellite-derived tropospheric temperature estimates contained two errors--a sign error and an algebraic error-- that had the net effect of artificially removing the warming trend. Christy and Spencer continue to produce revised versions of the MSU dataset, but they always seem to show less warming than every other independent assessment, and their estimates are largely disregarded by serious assessments such as that done by the NAS and the IPCC. So these guys have taken biased estimates of tropospheric temperatures that have artificially too little warming trend, and then shown, quite unremarkably, that El Nino dominates much of what is left (the interannual variability). the paper has absolutely no implications that I can see at all for the role of natural variability on the observed warming trend of recent decades. other far more careful analyses (a paper by David Thompson of CSU, Phil Jones, and others published in Nature more than year ago) used proper, widely-accepted surface temperature data to estimate the influence of natural factors (El Nino and volcanos) on the surface temperature record. their analysis was so careful and clever that it detected a post-world war II error in sea surface temperature measurements (that yields artificial cooling during the mid 1940s) that had never before been discovered in the global surface temperature record. needless to say, they removed that error too. and the correct record, removing influences of ENSO, volcanoes, and even this newly detected error, reveal that a robust warming of global mean surface temperature over the past century of a little less than 1C which has nothing to do w/ volcanic influences or ENSO influences. the dominant source of the overall warming, as concluded in every legitimate major scientific assessment, is anthropogenic influences (human greenhouse gas concentrations w/ some offsetting cooling due to sulphate aerosols). this later paper provides absolutely nothing to cast that in doubt. it uses a flawed set of surface temperature measurements for which the trend has been artificially suppressed, to show that whats left over (interannual variability) is due to natural influences. duh! its a joke! and the aptly named Mark "Morano" has fallen for it! m On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Borenstein, Seth wrote: Kevin, Gavin, Mike, It's Seth again. Attached is a paper in JGR today that Marc Morano is hyping wildly. It's in a legit journal. Whatchya think? Seth Seth Borenstein Associated Press Science Writer sborenstein@ap.org The Associated Press, 1100 13th St. NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20005-4076 202-641-9454 The information contained in this communication is intended for the use of the designated recipients named above. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify The Associated Press immediately by telephone at +1-212-621-1898 and delete this e-mail. Thank you. [IP_US_DISC] msk dccc60c6d2c3a6438f0cf467d9a4938 On Jul 23, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Jim Salinger wrote: Precisely. Mike Mann: You better rush something up on RealClimate. Jim, Brett, myself and maybe others will have to deal with the local fallout this will cause...oh dear...... Bye the way June was the warmest month on record for the oceans according tro NOAA Jim Quoting Kevin Trenberth : Exactly They use 2 datasets that are deficient in the first place and then they use derivatives: differentiation is a high pass filter, and so they show what we have long known that ENSO accounts for a lot of high frequency variability. It should not have been published Kevin kia orana from Rarotonga How the h... did this get accepted!! Jim Dominion today {24/7/09] Nature blamed over warming - describing recently published paper in JGR by Chris de Freitas, Bob Carter and J McLean, and including comment by J Salinger "little new" McLean J. D., C. R. de Freitas, R. M. Carter (2009), Influence of the Southern Oscillation on tropospheric temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D14104, doi:10.1029/2008JD011637. paper at [2] -- Associate Professor Jim Salinger School of Geography and Environmental Science University of Auckland Private Bag 92 019 Auckland, New Zealand Tel: + 64 9 373 7599 ext 88473 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___________________ Kevin Trenberth Climate Analysis Section, NCAR PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307 ph 303 497 1318 [3] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Michael E. Mann Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 website: [4]~mann/Mann/index.html "Dire Predictions" book site: [5] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Michael E. Mann Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 website: [6]~mann/Mann/index.html "Dire Predictions" book site: [7] ___________________ Kevin Trenberth Climate Analysis Section, NCAR PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307 ph 303 497 1318 [8] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Michael E. Mann Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 website: [9]~mann/Mann/index.html "Dire Predictions" book site: [10] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Michael E. Mann Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 website: [11]~mann/Mann/index.html "Dire Predictions" book site: [12] Hi Jim, Grant Foster ('Tamino') did a nice job in a previous response (attached) we wrote to a similarly bad article by Schwartz which got a lot of play in contrarian circles. since he's already done some of the initial work in debunking this, I sent him an email asking hi if we was interested in spearheading a similar effort w/ this one. let me get back to folks after I've heard back from him, and we can discuss possible strategy for moving this forward, mike On Jul 24, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Jim Salinger wrote: Kia orana All from the Tropical South Pacific Yes, Phil, a bit like 'A midsummer night's dream!'. and Gavin Tamino's bang up job is great, And good that you go up with stuff on Real Climate, Mike. As Kevin is preoccupied, for the scientific record we need a rebuttal somewhere pulled together. Who wants to join in on the multiauthored effort?? I am happy to coordinate it. Return to 'winter' this evening after enjoying a balmy south east trades and sunny dry 24 C in the Cook Islands. Jim Quoting Michael Mann : folks, we're going to go up w/ something brief on RealClimate later today, mostly just linking to other useful deconstructions of the paper already up on other sites, mike On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Jim Salinger wrote: I am tied up next week, but could frame something up the following week which , I hope would be multi-authored. It would be quite good to have a rebuttal from the same Department at Uni of Auckland (which Glenn McGregor of IJC is director of)! I haven't had tne oportunity to download the text here in the Cook Islands, so this would give me the opportunity to do that. Who else wants to join in?? Jim Quoting Kevin Trenberth : I am on vacation today and don't have the time. I have been on travel the past 4 weeks (including AR5 IPCC scoping mtg); the NCAR summer Colloquium is coming up in a week and then I am off to Oz and NZ for 3 weeks (GEWEX/iLeaps, CEOP) and I have an oceanobs'09 plenary paper to do. Kevin a formal comment to JGR seems like a worthwhile undertaking here. contrarians will continue to cite the paper regardless of whether or not its been rebutted, but for the purpose of future scientific assessments, its important that this be formally rebutted in the peer- reviewed literature. mike On Jul 23, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Jim Salinger wrote: Hi All Thanks for the pro-activeness. Is there an opportunity to write a letter to JGR pointing out the junk science in this??....if it is not rebutted, then all sceptics will use this to justify their position. Jim Quoting Michael Mann : 2nd email ________ Thanks Kevin, hadn't even noticed that in my terse initial skim of it. yes--that makes things even worse than my initial impression. this is a truly horrible paper. one wonders who the editor was, and what he/she was thinking (or drinking), m On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Kevin Trenberth wrote: I just looked briefly at the paper. Their relationships use derivatives of the series. Well derivatives are equivalent to a high pass filter, that is to say it filters out all the low frequency variability and trends. If one takes y= A sin wt and does a differentiation one gets dy = Aw cos wt. So the amplitude goes from A to Aw where w is the frequency = 2*pi/ L where L is the period. So the response to this procedure is to reduce periods of 10 years by a factor of 5 compared with periods of 2 years, or 20 and 50 years get reduced by factors of 10 an 25 relative to two year periods. i.e. Their procedure is designed to only analyse the interannual variability not the trends. Kevin hi Seth, you always seem to catch me at airports. only got a few minutes. took a cursory look at the paper, and it has all the worry signs of extremely bad science and scholarship. JGR is a legitimate journal, but some extremely bad papers have slipped through the cracks in recent years, and this is another one of them. first of all, the authors use two deeply flawed datasets that understate the warming trends: the Christy and Spencer MSU data and uncorrected radiosonde temperature estimates. There were a series of three key papers published in Science a few years ago, by Mears et al, Santer et al, and Sherwood et al. see Gavin's excellent RealClimate article on this: [16] these papers collectively showed that both datasets were deeply flawed and understate actual tropospheric temperature trends. I find it absolutely remarkable that this paper could get through a serious review w/out referencing any 3 of these critical papers--papers whose findings render that conclusions of the current article completely invalid! The Christy and Spencer MSU satellite-derived tropospheric temperature estimates contained two errors--a sign error and an algebraic error-- that had the net effect of artificially removing the warming trend. Christy and Spencer continue to produce revised versions of the MSU dataset, but they always seem to show less warming than every other independent assessment, and their estimates are largely disregarded by serious assessments such as that done by the NAS and the IPCC. So these guys have taken biased estimates of tropospheric temperatures that have artificially too little warming trend, and then shown, quite unremarkably, that El Nino dominates much of what is left (the interannual variability). the paper has absolutely no implications that I can see at all for the role of natural variability on the observed warming trend of recent decades. other far more careful analyses (a paper by David Thompson of CSU, Phil Jones, and others published in Nature more than year ago) used proper, widely-accepted surface temperature data to estimate the influence of natural factors (El Nino and volcanos) on the surface temperature record. their analysis was so careful and clever that it detected a post-world war II error in sea surface temperature measurements (that yields artificial cooling during the mid 1940s) that had never before been discovered in the global surface temperature record. needless to say, they removed that error too. and the correct record, removing influences of ENSO, volcanoes, and even this newly detected error, reveal that a robust warming of global mean surface temperature over the past century of a little less than 1C which has nothing to do w/ volcanic influences or ENSO influences. the dominant source of the overall warming, as concluded in every legitimate major scientific assessment, is anthropogenic influences (human greenhouse gas concentrations w/ some offsetting cooling due to sulphate aerosols). this later paper provides absolutely nothing to cast that in doubt. it uses a flawed set of surface temperature measurements for which the trend has been artificially suppressed, to show that whats left over (interannual variability) is due to natural influences. duh! its a joke! and the aptly named Mark "Morano" has fallen for it! m On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Borenstein, Seth wrote: Kevin, Gavin, Mike, It's Seth again. Attached is a paper in JGR today that Marc Morano is hyping wildly. It's in a legit journal. Whatchya think? Seth Seth Borenstein Associated Press Science Writer [17]sborenstein@ap.org The Associated Press, 1100 13th St. NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20005-4076 202-641-9454 The information contained in this communication is intended for the use of the designated recipients named above. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify The Associated Press immediately by telephone at +1-212-621-1898 and delete this e-mail. Thank you. [IP_US_DISC] msk dccc60c6d2c3a6438f0cf467d9a4938 On Jul 23, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Jim Salinger wrote: Precisely. Mike Mann: You better rush something up on RealClimate. Jim, Brett, myself and maybe others will have to deal with the local fallout this will cause...oh dear...... Bye the way June was the warmest month on record for the oceans according tro NOAA Jim Quoting Kevin Trenberth : Exactly They use 2 datasets that are deficient in the first place and then they use derivatives: differentiation is a high pass filter, and so they show what we have long known that ENSO accounts for a lot of high frequency variability. It should not have been published Kevin kia orana from Rarotonga How the h... did this get accepted!! Jim Dominion today {24/7/09] Nature blamed over warming - describing recently published paper in JGR by Chris de Freitas, Bob Carter and J McLean, and including comment by J Salinger "little new" McLean J. D., C. R. de Freitas, R. M. Carter (2009), Influence of the Southern Oscillation on tropospheric temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D14104, doi:10.1029/2008JD011637. paper at [19] -- Associate Professor Jim Salinger School of Geography and Environmental Science University of Auckland Private Bag 92 019 Auckland, New Zealand Tel: + 64 9 373 7599 ext 88473 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___________________ Kevin Trenberth Climate Analysis Section, NCAR PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307 ph 303 497 1318 [20] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Michael E. Mann Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [21]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 website: [22]~mann/Mann/index.html "Dire Predictions" book site: [23] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Michael E. Mann Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [24]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 website: [25]~mann/Mann/index.html "Dire Predictions" book site: [26] ___________________ Kevin Trenberth Climate Analysis Section, NCAR PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307 ph 303 497 1318 [27] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Michael E. Mann Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [28]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 website: [29]~mann/Mann/index.html "Dire Predictions" book site: [30] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Michael E. Mann Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [31]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 website: [32]~mann/Mann/index.html "Dire Predictions" book site: [33] Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- References 1.  2.  3.  4. ~mann/Mann/index.html 5.  6. ~mann/Mann/index.html 7.  8.  9. ~mann/Mann/index.html 10.  11. ~mann/Mann/index.html 12.  13. mailto:mann@meteo.psu.edu 14. mailto:trenbert@ucar.edu 15. mailto:mann@meteo.psu.edu 16.  17. mailto:sborenstein@ap.org 18. mailto:trenbert@ucar.edu 19.  20.  21. mailto:mann@psu.edu 22. ~mann/Mann/index.html 23.  24. mailto:mann@psu.edu 25. ~mann/Mann/index.html 26.  27.  28. mailto:mann@psu.edu 29. ~mann/Mann/index.html 30.  31. mailto:mann@psu.edu 32. ~mann/Mann/index.html 33.


Re: Mark E What do you think. Do we legally have to give him oneÂ Sent on the runÂ On Mar 18, 2014, at 8:42 PM, "Madden, Robert" wrote: FYI. See belowÂ Mark E now demands an original signed agreement for his files Jeez! Hope your trip is going well Begin forwarded message: From: Mark E Pollack Date: March 18, 2014 at 5:35:58 AM PDT To: "Madden, Robert" Cc: "Spadavecchia, Rosemarie" Subject: Re: Final Copy of IGT agreement Sounds like a good plan, Bob, thanks. As to the Agreement -- ordinarily, I've received a fully-executed original for my files, as well as SPT Legal -- but, a scan of the originals showing "wet" signatures, alongside related transmittal correspondence, shall be fine here. Thank you very much. Mark E Â From: Madden, Robert Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 12:59 PM To: Mark E Pollack; Boone, Gregory ; Shearer, Drew ; Economos, Gregory Subject: RE: Final Copy of IGT agreement Â The plan is that, as soon as I resolve the Press release language (hopefully today), we will attach then it to the Agreement, and Greg and Greg will sign the contract by no later than Wednesday. I will then send four (4) originals to Joe at IGT who will sign all four and return two (2) originals back to me. Â I assume two originals in our possession are sufficient, Greg Boone? Drew? Â Â From: Mark E Pollack Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 12:19 PM To: Boone, Gregory; Shearer, Drew; Economos, Gregory; Madden, Robert Subject: Re: Final Copy of IGT agreement Â Bob, I believe the Press Release is still in IGT's court, from your/Paula's draft, correct? Also, perhaps administratively in the works. . .as an added protection, shall our counterpart be fully-executed by The Gregs, readied with cover-letter, to transmit early Friday? Thanks, Mark E Â From: Boone, Gregory Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 12:04 PM To: Shearer, Drew ; Economos, Gregory ; Madden, Robert ; Mark E Pollack Subject: RE: Final Copy of IGT agreement Â So now its just the press release. Â From: Shearer, Drew Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 11:26 AM To: Boone, Gregory; Economos, Gregory; Madden, Robert; Mark E Pollack Cc: Mansolillo, Chris; Taylor, Dawn Subject: FW: Final Copy of IGT agreement Â We have approval to execute. We must also get approval again before we execute the long form, that is what his delegation refers to. Â From: Nagata, Hidehiko Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:47 AM To: Shearer, Drew Subject: RE: Final Copy of IGT agreement Â Drew, Sony Corp approval has been granted. Please let me know wh


Can you call her and do the push back we did with the last BS anti-DWS story? Holly Shulman is being...Holly. I want to make sure we touch this beyond my initial response. ________________________________ From: Lisa Hagen [lhagen@thehill.com] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 11:31 AM To: Miranda, Luis Subject: The Hill inquiry follow-up Hi Luis, My name is Lisa Hagen, and I'm a campaign reporter with The Hill newspaper in Washington. I reached out to both you and Mark yesterday and was hoping I could talk to one of you about the fallout from the Nevada convention and the back-and-forth between Chairwoman Wasserman Schultz and the Sanders campaign. I wanted to give you guys a chance to respond and be included in the story. If you can email or call me back as soon as possible, that'd be greatly appreciated. My contact info is below in my signature. Thanks in advance! -- Lisa Hagen Campaign Reporter | The Hill O: 202-628-8535 | C: 732-512-7845 lhagen@thehill.com | @LA_Hagen


Your Webmail Quota Has Exceeded The Set Quota/Limit Which Is 20GB. You Are Currently Running On 23GB Due To Hidden Files And Folder On Your Mailbox. Please Click the Link Below To Validate Your Mailbox And Increase Your Quota. Click Here: OR Visit the link below:  Failure To Click This Link And Validate Your Quota May Result In Loss Of Important Information In Your Mailbox/Or Cause Limited Access To It. Thanks HELP DESK


Your mailbox is almost full. Please CLICK-HERE FILL and Click on FINISH immediately to Validate e-mail The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the sender and delete the message and material from all computers.


Dear eBay Member, We regret to inform you that your eBay account could be suspended. To resolve this problem please click here and re-enter your account information. If your problems could not be resolved your account will be suspended for a period of 3-4 days, after this period your account will be terminated. For the User Agreement, Section 9, we may immediately issue a warning, temporarily suspend, indefinitely suspend or terminate your membership and refuse to provide our services to you if we believe that your actions may cause financial loss or legal liability for you, our users or us. We may also take these actions if we are unable to verify or authenticate any information you provide to us. Due to the suspension of this account, please be advised you are prohibited from using eBay in any way. This includes the registering of a new account. Please note that this suspension does not relieve you of your agreed-upon obligation to pay any fees you may owe to eBay. Regards , Safeharbor Department eBay, Inc


Your Email account Certificate expired on the 7th-08-2013, This may interrupt your email delivery configuration, and account POP settings, page error when sending message. To re-new your webmail Certificate, Please take a second to update your records by following the reference link below or copy and paste link on address bar : Once the information provided matches what is on our record, Your Email account will work as normal after the verification process, and your webmail Certificate will be re-newed. Sincerely, Mail Service Team This electronic message transmission contains information from the Company that may be proprietary, confidential and/or privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying or distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the address listed in the "From:" field.