Donald Trump's Alaska Campaign Team Includes Convicted Felon Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's campaign team in Alaska includes a former state lawmaker who served prison time for corruption. Republican Tom Anderson, who was named Monday as Trump's press representative in the state, was convicted in 2007 of bribery, extortion, money laundering and conspiracy for accepting bribes from a private prison company in exchange for advancing the company's interests in the Alaska legislature. He served four years in federal prison and was released in 2011. Anderson was listed as the press contact on Monday's announcement naming an assortment of state Republicans to Trump Alaska 2016 , the campaign organization for the presumptive GOP nominee. He is now a managing partner of Optima Public Relations, a firm founded by his father, Tom Anderson Sr., in 2011 — weeks before Anderson was released from prison. Anderson also hosts "The Tom Anderson Show ," a morning radio program. On Monday, he teased a scoop ahead of the formal release of "who the Policy Platform Committee members and Honorary Co-Chairs will be for the Trump Alaska 2016 organization. Don't miss it. Big names!" [ TOM ANDERSON SHOW A spokeswoman for the Trump campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment late Monday night. UPDATE: Reached by phone, Anderson told the Huffington Post, "I wanted to get involved with the presidential campaign, and I helped the Trump Alaska 2016 team craft a press release. I also offered to help with media relations. I am not a member of the Trump campaign staff, and I'm not working for any presidential campaign. I look forward to a vigorous 2016 general election." Read the entire Trump campaign announcement below. -- Walter Garcia Western Regional Press Secretary Democratic National Committee (DNC) Email: GarciaW@dnc.org Twitter: @WalterGarcia231 [SigDems]


Chris and John (and Mike for info), I'm basically reiterating Mike's email. There seem to be two lots of suggestions doing the rounds. Both are basically groundless. 1. Recent paleo doesn't show warming. This basically stems back to Keith Briffa's paper in Nature in 1998 (Vol 391, pp678-682). In this it was shown that northern boreal forest conifers don't pick up all the observed warming since about the late 1950s. It was suggested that some other factor or a combination of factors related to human-induced pollution (e.g. nitrogen deposition, higher levels of CO2, ozone depletion etc). Hence in a new paper submitted to JGR recently we develop a new standardization approach (called age banding) and produce a large-scale reconstruction (calibrated over the period 1881-1960 against NH land north of 20N) back to 1402. If you want a copy of this can you email Keith and he'll send copies once he's back from holiday. This background is to illustrate how Singer et al distort things. The new reconstruction only runs to 1960 as did earlier ones based solely on tree-ring density. All the other long series (Mike's, Tom Crowley's and mine) include other proxy information (ice cores, corals, historical records, sediments and early instrumental records as well as tree-ring width data, which are only marginally affected). All these series end around 1980 or in the early 1980s. We don't have paleo data for much of the last 20 years. It would require tremendous effort and resources to update a lot of the paleo series because they were collected during the 1970s/early 1980s. It is possible to add the instrumental series on from about 1980 (Mike sought of did this in his Nature article to say 1998 was the warmest of the millennium - and I did something similar in Rev. Geophys.) but there is no way Singer can say the proxy data doesn't record the last 20 years of warming, as we don't have enough of the proxy series after about 1980.  takes the argument further saying that as trees don't see all the warming since about 1960 the instrumental records recently must be in error (i.e. this group believes the trees and not the instrumental records). This piece by Idso and Idso seems to want to have the argument whichever suits them. 2. Everyone knows it was cooler during the Little Ice Age and warmer in the Medieval Warm Period. All of the millennial-long reconstructions show these features, but they are just less pronounced than people believed in the 1960s and 1970s, when there was much less paleo data and its spatial extent was limited to the eastern US/N.Atlantic/European and Far East areas. The issue seems to revolve around the average temperatures we have for earlier centuries in the millennium. I use the argument that for the instrumental period we need sites located over much of the NH (land and marine) regions in order to claim we have a reasonable record for the whole hemisphere. We wouldn't dream of extending the NH series based on longer European records and in the extreme just CET, so with the paleo data we need records from as many regions as possible. The coverage still could be better, but it is far better than it was 25 years ago, when the ideas embodied in the MWP and LIA became sort of mainstream. The typical comments I've heard, generally relate to the MWP, and say that crops and vines were grown further north than they are now (the vines grown in York in Viking times etc). Similarly, statements about frost fairs and freezing of the Baltic so armies could cross etc. Frost fairs on the Thames in London occurred more readily because the tidal limit was at the old London Bridge (the 5ft weir under it). The bridge was rebuilt around the 1840s and the frost fairs stopped. If statements continue to be based on historical accounts they will be easy to knock down with all the usual phrases such as the need for contemporary sources, reliable chroniclers and annalists, who witnessed the events rather than through hearsay. As you all know various people in CRU (maybe less so now) have considerable experience in dealing with this type of data. Christian Pfister also has a lifetime of experience of this. There is a paper coming out from the CRU conference with a reconstruction of summer and winter temps for Holland back to about AD 800, which shows the 20th century warmer than all others. Evidence is sparser before 1400 but the workers at KNMI (Aryan van Engelen et al.) take all this into account. I hope this is of use and hasn't been a total waste of time. In Victoria last month, did you discuss how the policymaker's summary will report the millennial temperature series ? Are there any tentative phrases you're working on a la Balance of evidence etc ? Is Chapter 12 thinking of a new sentence to supercede the above ? Any sentence on the millennium record should be in Ch. 2. Cheers Phil Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ueacanitdb01.uea.ac.uk id n457EfQ5005459 Phil, Do you know where this stands? The key things from the Peiser items are ... "Wang had been claiming the existence of such exonerating documents for nearly a year, but he has not been able to produce them. Additionally, there was a report published in 1991 (with a second version in 1997) explicitly stating that no such documents exist. Moreover, the report was published as part of the Department of Energy Carbon Dioxide Research Program, and Wang was the Chief Scientist of that program." and "Wang had a co-worker in Britain. In Britain, the Freedom of Information Act requires that data from publicly-funded research be made available. I was able to get the data by requiring Wang���s co-worker to release it, under British law. It was only then that I was able to confirm that Wang had committed fraud." You are the co-worker, so you must have done something like provide Keenan with the DOE report that shows that there are no station records for 49 of the 84 stations. I presume Keenan therefore thinks that it was not possible to select stations on the basis of ... "... station histories: selected stations have relatively few, if any, changes in instrumentation, location, or observation times" [THIS IS ITEM "X"] Of course, if the only stations used were ones from the 35 stations that *did* have station histories, then all could be OK. However, if some of the stations used were from the remaining 49, then the above selection method could not have been applied (but see below) -- unless there are other "hard copy" station history data not in the DOE report (but in China) that were used. From what Wang has said, if what he says is true, the second possibility appears to be the case. What is the answer here? The next puzzle is why Wei-Chyung didn't make the hard copy information available. Either it does not exist, or he thought it was too much trouble to access and copy. My guess is that it does not exist -- if it did then why was it not in the DOE report? In support of this, it seems that there are other papers from 1991 and 1997 that show that the data do not exist. What are these papers? Do they really show this? Now my views. (1) I have always thought W-C W was a rather sloppy scientist. I therefore would not be surprised if he screwed up here. But ITEM X is in both the W-C W and Jones et al. papers -- so where does it come from first? Were you taking W-C W on trust? (2) It also seems to me that the University at Albany has screwed up. To accept a complaint from Keenan and not refer directly to the complaint and the complainant in its report really is asking for trouble. (3) At the very start it seems this could have been easily dispatched. ITEM X really should have been ... "Where possible, stations were chosen on the basis of station histories and/or local knowledge: selected stations have relatively few, if any, changes in instrumentation, location, or observation times" Of course the real get out is the final "or". A station could be selected if either it had relatively few "changes in instrumentation" OR "changes in location" OR "changes in observation times". Not all three, simply any one of the three. One could argue about the science here -- it would be better to have all three -- but this is not what the statement says. Why, why, why did you and W-C W not simply say this right at the start? Perhaps it's not too late? ----- I realise that Keenan is just a trouble maker and out to waste time, so I apologize for continuing to waste your time on this, Phil. However, I *am* concerned because all this happened under my watch as Director of CRU and, although this is unlikely, the buck eventually should stop with me. Best wishes, Tom P.S. I am copying this to Ben. Seeing other peoples' troubles might make him happier about his own parallel experiences. Return-Path: X-Original-To: wigley@cgd.ucar.edu Delivered-To: wigley@cgd.ucar.edu Received: from nscan3.ucar.edu (nscan3.ucar.edu [128.117.64.193]) by post2.cgd.ucar.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB38C3803F; Sun, 3 May 2009 08:57:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nscan3.ucar.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDD3230C024; Sun, 3 May 2009 08:57:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from nscan3.ucar.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nscan3.ucar.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12674-01; Sun, 3 May 2009 08:57:37 -0600 (MDT) X-SMTP-Auth: no X-SMTP-Auth: no Received: from exch4.jmu.ac.uk (exch4.jmu.ac.uk [150.204.37.14]) by nscan3.ucar.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B970230C00B; Sun, 3 May 2009 08:57:25 -0600 (MDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Subject: CCNet Xtra: Climate Science Fraud at Albany University? Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 15:57:08 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: CCNet Xtra: Climate Science Fraud at Albany University? Thread-Index: AcnIu0OvOgPY3fShTXip0PBdcf9mWwAAWuOQAGIoisAAbhWS4A== From: "Peiser, Benny" To: "cambridge-conference" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ucar.edu CCNet Xtra - 3 May 2009 -- Audiatur et altera pars CLIMATE SCIENCE FRAUD AT ALBANY UNIVERSITY? ------------------------------------------- The University at Albany is in a difficult position. If the University received such records as part of the supposed misconduct investigation, then they could easily resolve the problem by making them available to the scientific community and to readers. If the University does not have such records then they have been complicit in misconduct and in coverup of misconduct. If the University at Albany does have such records, but such records are not in accordance with the stated methodology of the publications, then the University has more serious difficulties. "Investigations" of scientific misconduct should themselves align with the usual principles of scientific discourse (open discussion, honesty, transparency of method, public disclosure of evidence, open public analysis and public discussion and reasoning underlying any conclusion). This was not the case at the University at Albany. When you see universities reluctant to investigate things properly, it provides reasonable evidence that they really don't want to investigate things properly. -- Aubrey Blumsohn, Scientific Misconduct Blog, 2 May 2009 (1) ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD AT ALBANY - THE WANG CASE Aubrey Blumsohn, Scientific Misconduct Blog, 2 May 2009 (2) THE FRAUD ALLEGATION AGAINST SOME CLIMATIC RESEARCH OF WEI-CHYUNG WANG Douglas J. Keenan, Informath, April 2009 (3) KAFKA AT ALBANY Peter Risdon, Freeborn John, 15 March 2009 ===== (1) ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD AT ALBANY - THE WANG CASE Scientific Misconduct Blog, 2 May 2009 Aubrey Blumsohn Professor Wei-Chyung Wang is a star scientist in the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center at the University at Albany, New York. He is a key player in the climate change debate (see his self-description here). Wang has been accused of scientific fraud. I have no inclination to "weigh in" on the topic of climate change. However the case involves issues of integrity that are at the very core of proper science. These issues are the same whether they are raised in a pharmaceutical clinical trial, in a basic science laboratory, by a climate change "denialist" or a "warmist". The case involves the hiding of data, access to data, and the proper description of "method" in science. The case is also of interest because it provides yet another example of how *not* to create trust in a scientific misconduct investigation. It adds to the litany of cases suggesting that Universities cannot be allowed to investigate misconduct of their own star academics. The University response has so far been incoherent on its face. Doug Keenan, the mathematician who raised the case of Wang is on the "denialist" side of the climate change debate. He maintains that "almost by itself, the withholding of their raw data by [climate] scientists tells us that they are not scientists". Below is my own summary of the straightforward substance of this case. I wrote to Wei-Chyung Wang, to Lynn Videka (VP at Albany, responsible for the investigation), and to John H. Reilly (a lawyer at Albany) asking for any correction or comments on the details presented below. My request was acknowledged prior to publication, but no factual correction was suggested. Case Summary The allegations concern two publications. These are: Jones P.D., Groisman P.Y., Coughlan M., Plummer N., Wang W.-C., Karl T.R. (1990), ���Assessment of urbanization effects in time series of surface air temperature over land���, Nature, 347: 169�172. (PDF here) Wang W.-C.., Zeng Z., Karl T.R. (1990), ���Urban heat islands in China���, Geophysical Research Letters, 17: 2377�2380. (PDDF here) The publications concern temperature at a variety of measuring stations over three decades (1954-1983). Stations are denoted by name or number. A potential confounder in such research is that measuring stations may be moved to different locations at different points in time. It is clearly important that readers of publications understand the methodology, and important confounders. The publications make the following statements: (Statement A) "The stations were selected on the basis of station history: we chose those with few, if any, changes in instrumentation, location or observation times." [Jones et al.] (Statement B) "They were chosen based on station histories: selected stations have relatively few, if any, changes in instrumentation, location, or observation times�." [Wang et al.] The publications refer to a repoort produced jointly by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) which details station moves, and the publications further suggest that stations with few if any moves or changes were selected on the basis of that report. However: Of 84 stations that were selected, Keenan found that information about only 35 are available in the DOE/CAS report Of those 35 stations at least half did have substantial moves (e.g 25 km). One station had five different locations during 1954�1983 as far as 41 km apart. It therefore appears that Statements A and B must be false. If false, readers would have been misled both in terms of the status of the stations and the manner in which they had been selected (or not selected). Keenan then communicated with the author of one of the publications (Jones) to ask about the source of location information pertaining to the other 49 stations that had not been selected using the described methodology. Jones informed Keenan that his co-author Wang had selected those stations in urban and rural China based on his "extensive knowledge of those networks". On 11 April 2007 Keenan E-mailed Wang, asking "How did you ensure the quality of the data?���. Wang did not answer for several weeks, but on 30 April 2007 he replied as follows: "The discussion with Ms. Zeng last week in Beijing have re-affirmed that she used the hard copies of station histories to make sure that the selected stations for the study of urban warming in China have relatively few, if any, changes in instrumentation, location, or observation times over the study period (1954-1983)" Keenan points out that the ���hard copies��� to which Wang refers were not found by the authors of the DOE/CAS report, who had endeavored to be "comprehensive" (and that the DOE/CAS report was authored in part by Zeng, one of the co-authors on Wang). Keenan further notes that any form of comprehensive data covering these stations during the Cultural Revolution would be implausible. In August 2007 Keenan submitted a report to the University at Albany, alleging fraud. Wang could at that stage have made the "hard copy" details of the stations selected available to the scientific community. However, he failed to do so. In May 2008, the University at Albany wrote to Keenan that they had conducted an investigation and asked him to comment on it (see the rather odd letter). However they refused to show him the report of the investigation or any of the evidence to allow any comment (further odd letter). In August 2008 the University sent Keenan an astonishing letter of "determination" stating that they did not find that Wang had fabricated data, but that they refused to provide any investigation report or any other information at all because "the Office of Research Integrity regulations preclude discussion of any information pertaining to this case with others who were not directly involved in the investigation". Wang has still not made the station records available to the scientific community. If he provided such records to the University as part of a misconduct investigation, then the University has apparently concealed them. Comments In the absence of any explanation to the contrary, it seems that the methodology for station selection as described in these two publications was false and misleading. Wang maintains that hard copy records do exist detailing the location of stations selected by himself outwith the published methodology. However the refusal to clarify "method" is inappropriate and a form of misconduct in and of itself. It does not lend credence to Wang's assertion that fraud did not take place. It would also be necessary to see records of stations that were not selected, in order to confirm that selection was indeed random, and only "on the basis of station history". The University at Albany is in a difficult position. If the University received such records as part of the supposed misconduct investigation, then they could easily resolve the problem by making them available to the scientific community and to readers. If the University does not have such records then they have been complicit in misconduct and in coverup of misconduct. If the University at Albany does have such records, but such records are not in accordance with the stated methodology of the publications, then the University has more serious difficulties. "Investigations" of scientific misconduct should themselves align with the usual principles of scientific discourse (open discussion, honesty, transparency of method, public disclosure of evidence, open public analysis and public discussion and reasoning underlying any conclusion). This was not the case at the University at Albany. When you see universities reluctant to investigate things properly, it provides reasonable evidence that they really don't want to investigate things properly. For further information on this case see here and here. ===================== (2) THE FRAUD ALLEGATION AGAINST SOME CLIMATIC RESEARCH OF WEI-CHYUNG WANG Informath, April 2009 Douglas J. Keenan Following are some remarks about my expos��, ���The fraud allegation against some climatic research of Wei-Chyung Wang���. Wei-Chyung Wang is a professor at the University at Albany, State University of New York. He has been doing research on climate for over 30 years, and he has authored or co-authored more than 100 peer-reviewed scientific articles. He has also received an Appreciation Plaque from the Office of Science in the U.S.A., commending him, ���For your insightful counsel and excellent science. ����. The plaque resulted in partticular from his research on global warming. I have formally alleged that Wang committed fraud in important parts of his global-warming research. Below is a relevant timeline. 03 August 2007 My report, ���Wei-Chyung Wang fabricated some scientific claims���, is sent to the Vice President for Research at Wang's university. 31 August 2007 The university notifies me that it is initiating an inquiry into suspected research misconduct by Wang. (The notification includes a copy of the university's Policy and Procedures on Misconduct in Research and Scholarship.) 12 November 2007 My expos�� on Wang's alleged fraud is published (reference below). 07 December 2007 Myself and the university's Inquiry Committee have a conference call. 20 February 2008 The university sends me the Report of the Inquiry Committee. The Committee unanimously concluded that ���there was no data��� (thus implicitly concluding Wang must have fabricated data) and that a full investigation should be undertaken. 23 May 2008 The university sends me a notice: the Investigation Committee has completed its work and found no evidence of fraud. The investigation was conducted without interviewing me, which is a violation of the university's policy. The university asks me to comment on the Committee's report; I am, however, not allowed to see the report. 04 June 2008 The university informs me that I am not allowed to see the report because they did not interview me when preparing it. 06 June 2008 I submit comments to the university, listing ways in which I believe the university has acted in breach of U.S. regulations and its own policy. 11 July 2008 I submit a complaint to the Public Integrity Bureau at the Office of the Attorney General of New York State, alleging criminal fraud. 12 August 2008 The university sends me the determination for its investigation, saying that there is ���no evidence whatsoever [of] � any research misconduct���. 07 Octoober 2008 I telephone the Public Integrity Bureau and am told that it might be some months before the Bureau begins to review the complaint. 17 March 2009 I telephone the Public Integrity Bureau and am told that the complaint is under review by an attorney. 18 March 2009 I file three requests under the Freedom of Information Law of New York State: for a copy of the full report by the Inquiry Committee; for a copy of the full report by the Investigation Committee; and, given that the relevant federal funding agencies are required to be notified when a misconduct investigation is initiated, for copies of all such notifications that were sent by the university and pertain to the investigation of Wang. 24 March 2009 Given that Wang received funding for the fraudulent research from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and that the DOE has since supplied more funding to Wang, I report the fraud and the university's apparent cover up to the Office of Inspector General at the DOE. This web page will be updated with news about the case, as the investigations progress. =========== (3) KAFKA AT ALBANY Freeborn John, 15 March 2009 Peter Risdon Last June I reported on the allegations of academic fraud levelled by a British mathematician, Doug Keenan, against Professor Wei-Chyung Wang of New York State University at Albany. Dr Keenan alleged that in work that has come to be widely cited in climate studies, work that included the collation of data from temperature measuring stations in China, Professor Wang made statements that "cannot be true and could not be in error by accident. The statements are fabricated." In August 2007, Dr Keenan submitted a report (pdf) of his allegations to the Vice President for Research at Wang's university and an inquiry was initiated. In February 2008 this was escalated into a full investigation by the Inquiry Committee. All this was summarised in my earlier post, together with quotations from Dr Keenan's allegation. So far, things had run as might be expected. A fraud had been alleged, the University at Albany looked into it and decided to hold a formal investigation. Dr Keenan waited to be contacted by the investigation and asked to put his case, in line with the university's Policy and Procedures on Misconduct in Research and Scholarship (.doc). The relevant section of this document runs as follows (emphasis added): III. A. Rights and Responsibilities of the Complainant Rights: The Vice President for Research will make every effort to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of complainants. The University will protect, to the maximum extent possible, the position and the reputation of those who in good faith report alleged misconduct in research. The Vice President for Research will work to ensure that complainants will not be retaliated against in the terms and conditions of their employment or other status at the University and will review instances of alleged retaliation for appropriate action. Any alleged or apparent retaliation should be reported immediately to the Vice President for Research. The complainant will be provided a copy of the formal allegations when and if an inquiry is opened. The complainant will have the opportunity to review portions of the inquiry and investigation reports pertinent to the complainant���s report or testimony, and will be informed in writing of the results of the inquiry and investigation, and of the final determination. After the final determination and upon request to the Vice President for Research, the complainant shall be given access to the full documentation. Responsibilities: The complainant is responsible for making allegations in good faith, maintaining confidentiality, and cooperating fully with an inquiry and/or investigation. Dr Keenan lived up to the responsibility as stated in the final paragraph above so far as he could. He had made the allegation in good faith and given Professor Wang an opportunity to explain how he had reached his results, an opportunity the Professor had not taken. Keenan maintained confidentiality. In order to cooperate with the investigation, though he would first have to be contacted by it. Dr Keenan waited. Late in May 2008 a communication arrived from Albany. It said: After careful review of the evidence and thoughtful deliberation, the Investigation Committee finds no evidence of the alleged fabrication of results and nothing that rises to the level of research misconduct having been committed by DR. Wang. As the institutional official responsible for this case, I have accepted the Committee's findings and the Report. You have fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of this letter to provide any comments to add to the report for the record. Contrary to its own rules, the Committee had not given Keenan the opportunity to "review portions of the inquiry and investigation reports". That's astonishing, but here's where it becomes Kafkaesque. Keenan was being asked, in this most recent communication, to comment on the report of the Committee. But he was not sent a copy of the report. When he challenged this, he received an email from Adrienne Bonilla explaining that: [Keenan] did not receive a copy of the Investigation report because the report did not include portions addressing your role and opinions in the investigation phase. Per the UAlbany Misconduct policy: VI. E. Investigation Report and Recommendations of the Vice President for Research "...The Vice President for Research will provide the respondent with a copy of the draft investigation report for comment and rebuttal and will provide the complainant with those portions of the draft report that address the complainant's role and opinions in the investigation. The respondent and complainant will be given 14 calendar days from the transmission of the report to provide their written comments. Any written responses to the report by either party will be made part of the report and record. Keenan then wrote to the Vice President for Research at Albany, Lynn Videka, pointing out the various ways in which the University had breached its own policy, stating that its behaviour was consistent with a cover up, and pointing out that Professor Wang has received more than $7 million in grants from a couple of US federal agencies. In August 2008, Lynn Videka wrote to Keenan enclosing a final copy of a "determination" of the investigation. In her covering note, she stated: I am notifying you of the case outcome because you were the complainant in this case. The University���s misconduct policies and the Office of Research Integrity regulations preclude discussion of any information pertaining to this case with others who were not directly involved in the investigation. To summarise, the university initiated an investigation, then broke its own rules by not involving Dr Keenan. It then produced a report that carefully avoided mentioning Dr Keenan, so it could claim he was not entitled to see a copy of this report. It then asked Keenan to comment on the report. It has completely disregarded its own policy that "After the final determination and upon request to the Vice President for Research, the complainant shall be given access to the full documentation." But Doug Keenan is a tenacious man. In July 2008, after being refused sight of the report, he submitted a formal complaint (pdf) to the Public Integrity Bureau at the Office of the Attorney General of New York State, alleging criminal fraud. In this complaint, he said: Wei-Chyung Wang is a professor at the University at Albany, State University of New York. He has been doing research for over 30 years. For this research, Wang has received at least $7 million. The funds have come primarily from the Department of Energy, with additional funding from other federal agencies (DOD, FAA, NSF). I have formally alleged that Wang committed fraud in important parts of his research. My allegation was submitted to the University at Albany; a copy is enclosed. The university conducted a preliminary inquiry; a copy of the report from the inquiry is enclosed (redacted, by the university). Briefly, Wang claimed that there were some documents that could exonerate him. The inquiry concluded that there should be a full investigation, which should be ���charged with obtaining and reviewing any such additional evidence ... so that a final resolution may be made regarding the allegation against Dr. Wang���. Wang had been claiming the existence of such exonerating documents for nearly a year, but he has not been able to produce them. Additionally, there was a report published in 1991 (with a second version in 1997) explicitly stating that no such documents exist. Moreover, the report was published as part of the Department of Energy Carbon Dioxide Research Program, and Wang was the Chief Scientist of that program. The university conducted an investigation. The investigation concluded that Wang is innocent. I believe that the case against Wang is strong and clear, and that the university is trying to cover up the fraud so as to protect its reputation. Wang is one of the university���s star professors. The conduct of the investigation violated several of the university���s own stated policies: details are given in an attached e-mail (dated 06 June 2008). The e-mail was sent to Lynn Videka, Vice President for Research at the university: Videka was in charge of overseeing the investigation. Note, in particular, that the documents that Wang was relying on were never produced. I have only examined a little of Wang���s research; so I do not know the full extent of the fraud. It is difficult to examine more in part because Wang has not willingly made his data available: when asked for the data from the research that I later reported as fraudulent, Wang refused. For that research, though, Wang had a co-worker in Britain. In Britain, the Freedom of Information Act requires that data from publicly-funded research be made available. I was able to get the data by requiring Wang���s co-worker to release it, under British law. It was only then that I was able to confirm that Wang had committed fraud. Details are given in my report to the university (page 4, last paragraph). I would be willing to help examine other research that Wang has done, if more data were made available. There was another case of research fraud with a professor at the University of Vermont, in 2005. There, Prof. Eric Poehlman was convicted of making false statements on federal grant applications; he was sentenced to a year and a day in prison. Wang has done the same as Poehlman. The fraudulent work described in my report dates from 1990; Wang has been relyingon that work in some of his grant applications since then. As I understand things, each of those applications is a violation of statute. (Additionally, Wang has been using the grants to go on frequent trips to China.) In October 2008 Dr Keenan was told there could be a wait of several months while his complaint is investigated. I'll let you know when there are any further developments. UPDATE: I didn't mention this in the main piece above, but I did mail the relevant person at Albany myself, some time ago, asking for news of the investigation against Professor Wang. I received no reply. However, within a couple of hours of this being posted, someone at Albany came to look at it, from the host aspmini-cc326.cc.albany.edu (169.226.172.35), having apparently been sent an email about it. So even if they are not communicative about this case, it seems someone at Albany is keeping their eyes open for reports of it. UPDATE: On reflection, the hit from Albany is also consistent with someone using Google Alerts to monitor coverage of this issue. UPDATE: Doug Keenan has been told on the telephone that this case is now under review by an attorney at the OAG Public Integrity Bureau. UPDATE: Also see new findings on the effect of urban warming. ---------------- CCNet is a scholarly electronic network edited by Benny Peiser. To subscribe, send an e-mail to listserver@ljmu.ac.uk ("subscribe cambridge-conference"). To unsubscribe send an e-mail to listserver@ljmu.ac.uk ("unsubscribe cambridge-conference"). Information circulated on this network is for scholarly and educational use only. The attached information may not be copied or reproduced for any other purposes without prior permission of the copyright holders. DISCLAIMER: The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed in the articles and texts and in other CCNet contributions do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of the editor.


Wedding Dance Bootcamp This Sunday!  #fblike This Sunday August 3rd from 2 -5 pm $65 in Advance / $85 at the Door register now and SAVE! Come on by this Sunday for our very popularÂ Wedding Dance Bootcamp.Â This three hour class will have you swaying, cuddling and dipping to all of your favorite romantic songs. We'll cover the the basic steps of Foxtrot, Waltz, American Tango and Contemporary Slow Dancing. You and your fiancé  will leave this class with some fun


Can I book the trip? Is Jenna coming? Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


We'll do >>> Geaccone, Tracy 10/12/01 12:14PM >>> After reviewing the budget yesterday, we noticed that goodwill was still being amortized in 2002. We need to take that out of your numbers. Jim and Kiri thought it was approximately $14 million. Thus, PGG should have an IBIT of $270. Please revise file and send back to me and copy Steve Schwarzbach thanks. Tracy -----Original Message----- From: OUTAMA, DARRINGTON Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:11 PM To: Geaccone, Tracy Cc: Winowitch, Carolyn; Giles, Valerie; Barnes, Jim Subject: 2 nd version of Plan... Hi Tracy, Please see attached for the Plan that Stan Horton will be looking at tomorrow morning. This version includes Intercompany interest expense that was not previously budgeted. It also has a more detail break-out of capital expenditures. For the O&M detail pages, we will not be able to give you the same break-out for our cost as you have requested. Our GL is build on FERC accounts and is not condusive to SAP type sorting. Also, note that all O&M are at this point still straight lined for the year. The quarterly shaping of earnings will not be available until mid to late November. There will be significant swing between quarters from these results to the final one. Let me know if you have any questions.


eBay sent this message to Jose Nazario (jnazario). Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more ==>  eBay ==>  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * eBay's turning 10 10 Special Deals * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dell Laptops from $250 ==>  Designer Handbags from $45 ==>  Dangle Earrings from $5 ==>  Plasma TVs from $1000 ==>  iPod Mini from $75 ==>  Leather Boots from $35 ==>  American Girl from $15 ==>  Crème de la Mer from $25 ==>  Electric Guitars from $150 ==>  Throwback Jerseys from $20 ==>  10 Fun Facts 1. It started with Pez ==>  2. eBay Cafe was the 1st chat board ==>  3. 1st yellow shooting star: parrothead88 ==>  4. In 1997, Beanie Babies rulled the earth ==>  5. 1st car sold was a Ferrari ==>  6. Honus Wagner baseball card sold for $1.3M ==>  7. Jet sold for $4.9M ==>  8. Best Shopping Award: Frenchy Bee ==>  9. Oldest pair of Levi's sold for $47,000 ==>  10. Best Looking Store: Puffy Pillow ==>  Celebrate eBay's 10th with great collectibles from the eBay shop ==>  Go to eBay ==>  ------------------------------------------------ Learn More to protect yourself from Spoof (fake) e-mails. Go to ==>  eBay sent this e-mail to you because your Notification Preferences indicate that you want to receive information about Special Events & Promotions. eBay will not request personal data (password, credit card/bank numbers) in an e-mail. You are subscribed as username@domain.com, registered on eBay. If you do not wish to receive further communications, sign into "My eBay" by clicking on the "My eBay" link found at the top of the eBay home page and change your Notification Preferences. Please note that it may take up to 10 days to process your request. Visit our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have any questions. Privacy Policy ==>  User Agreement ==>  Copyright © 2005 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc. eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


PayPal Security Measures! We want to add The New Anti Fraud System to your PayPal account. In accordance with PayPal's User Agreement and to ensure that your account has not been compromised, access to your account was limited. Your account access will remain limited until this issue has been resolved. To secure your account and quickly restore full access, we may require some additional information from you. To securely confirm your PayPal information please go directly to log in to your PayPal account and perform the steps necessary to restore your account access as soon as possible or click bellow:   To continue your verification procedure click here   Thank you for using PayPal! The PayPal Team Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and choose the "Help" link in the footer of any page. To receive email notifications in plain text instead of HTML, update your preferences here .


Dear Customer, You have 1 New Security Notification! In order to read, please LOG ON to your Scotia OnLine account and follow the steps. Sincerly, Scotiabank Customer Services © Scotiabank


ARE YOU HAVING TROUBLE WITH YOUR COMPUTER? THE PROBLEMS MAY NOT BE WITH YOUR COMPUTER? As part of a National Marketing Test, we are offering the most amazing Windows Tips. Over 60 ways to improve the performance of your computer. (GUARANTEED) You will gain a better understanding of your computer and Windows 95 - 98SE operating system just by using these amazing tips and tricks. With this program and its information you will be able to: Increase your computer's resources (Are you at 96%?) Search for hidden files Keyboard Shortcuts Restart your computer faster Open programs faster Find better ways to free up memory New PnP devices Find the hidden settings for Windows How to make a Restart Icon What to do when Windows won't start? Memory issues INI versus registry Changing Logon and Logoff screens Did you know you could change the name of your "Start" menu? THIS IS ONLY A SAMPLE OF WHAT IS AVAILABLE TO YOU WITH THIS PROGRAM. During this special promotion we will be offering this amazing program for just $14.95 postage paid. This is less than half of the suggested retail price of $29.99 All you will need to run this disk is a Windows based computer and an Internet browser (no need to be connected to the Internet). Sorry no Macintosh version available at this time. These are tips and tricks that computer technicians know and now you have all the information available for a low price of only $14.95 postage paid! Software and computer manufacturers don't want you to know these secrets, because they want you to buy their software and/or technology upgrades at very inflated prices. This investment of only $14.95 truly outweighs the frustration of a poorly working good computer. Gain a better understanding of your computer by using these tips. ORDER TODAY FOR YOUR COPY OF THIS AMAZING PROGRAM FOR WINDOWS. Postage paid. $14.95 US, $19.95 International (U.S dollars) (We accept Cash, Check or Money order) Make Checks payable to: C Chute PO Box 6337 Jacksonville, Fl. 32205-9998 Please Print Clearly Your Return: Name _______________________________________________________________l31__ Address _______________________________________________________________ City, State, and Zip Code _____________________________________________ E-mail Address_________________________________________________________ ........................................................................ This program is fully guaranteed. If you are unhappy just return the disk within 30 days And we will refund your money. Copyright 2001 C Chute All Rights Reserved All REMOVE requests AUTOMATICALLY honored upon receipt. PLEASE understand that any effort to disrupt, close or block this REMOVE account can only result in difficulties for others wanting to be removed from our master mailing list as it will be impossible to take anyone off the list if the remove instruction cannot be received. To be removed from our master mailing list please send an email to 2getoffmylist@start.com.au and place remove in the subject. Thank you: PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW! ONE DAY THEY WILL THANK YOU! This mailing is done by an independent marketing co. We apologize if this message has reached you in error. Save the Planet, Save the Trees! Advertise With E-mail. No wasted paper! Delete with One simple keystroke! Less refuse in our Dumps! Make it a great day! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ha! Susan, I like your spirit but you're dead wrong. Off the record, the point I was making is that you're misrepresenting the nature of my work. I was not involved in any activity that would trigger registration. Period. ________________________________ From: Susan Crabtree [scrabtree@washingtonexaminer.com] Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 8:03 AM To: Miranda, Luis Subject: Re: When exactly... Huh -- nobody put me up to this -- I read that you were hired by Trimpa in either Mother Jones or the Nation -- so no one ever paid you any money to work on Cuba related matters? Why would your name come up at all in these articles? I'm going to have to say that in the article I write -- that you're disavowing any involvement on the Cuba issue unless you explain to me exactly how you were involved -- unless of course the Nation or Mother Jones article got it wrong. If so, they should run a correction and I will talk to the pubs about that and then if they stand by their story, then that becomes the story I write. Sent from my iPhone On May 20, 2016, at 10:55 PM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: Susan, Off the record, your premise is wrong. For starters I was never an employee of the Trimpa Group, and I am not a lobbyist. That's not what I do, so clearly whoever put you up to this didn't give you accurate information. -------- Original message -------- From: Susan Crabtree > Date: 05/20/2016 07:07 (GMT-05:00) To: "Miranda, Luis" > Subject: Re: When exactly... Probably for Monday -- not sure I am writing anything -- just want to see why no one registered to lobby for the Cuba lobbying campaign that has been extensively written about. Also, I'm not sure that you were easy to get a hold of at that time -- in August of last year. I called and emailed repeatedly the logical place to reach you, the employer that seemed to be taking credit for the lobbying campaign for #CubaNow. They told me to call James Williams, the point man, I guess, and I tried him every way I could but he never responded. Follow ups to Trimpa to reach you or anyone else about it were not responded to. Sent from my iPhone On May 19, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: When are you writing for? I'm easy to find so the idea that you tried to reach me and couldn't didn't make sense. ________________________________ From: Susan Crabtree [scrabtree@washingtonexaminer.com ] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 7:09 PM To: Miranda, Luis Subject: Re: When exactly... Nice to hear from you. Last August before I went on maternity leave when I did the story. Wasn't going to bring up your name today but Josh was trying to get me to be more forthcoming about what I was getting at and I understood why he was doing that and thought o would just be forthcoming. But I do have questions about your role in the Trimpa Group's lobbying on the Cuba issue. I contacted the Trimpa Group several times to try to reach you -- didn't know you had moved on to the DNC until yesterday. Sent from my iPhone On May 19, 2016, at 6:44 PM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: Did you try to reach me? Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


Dear valued PayPal® member: It has come to our attention that your PayPal® account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account suspension. Please update your records on or before December 7, 2005. Once you have updated your account records, your PayPal® session will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To update your PayPal® records click on the following link: Thank You. PayPal® UPDATE TEAM   Accounts Management As outlined in our User Agreement, PayPal® will periodically send you information about site changes and enhancements. Visit our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have any questions.


body{ background-color: #d2d2d2; } a img{border: none;}.ReadMsgBody { width: 100%;}.ExternalClass {width: 100%;} body{ background-color: #d2d2d2; } a img{border: none;} a { text-decoration:none; color:#00457c;} View on Mobile Phone | View as Web page Join us November 20, 2013 Restricting User Privileges Doesn't Make You a Bad Person... Dear Mauro, IT teams cannot get in the way of business. Yet, they also have a duty to the organization to protect critical information and prevent attacks. It turns out the path of least resistance for many attacks is to target device users and wait for them to make a mistake, thus providing an opening for compromise. A reliable way to reduce attack surface and take the human element (and fallibility) out of the equation is to restrict the access of the employees. By limiting what they can do on their devices, you basically protect them from themselves. Unfortunately, this can be a controversial method, given that employees want to do what they want and IT cannot get in the way of what these business leaders think is important.  Restricting User Privileges w/ Mike Rothman November 20, 2013 10AM PT / 1PM ET In this webcast, Securosis analyst Mike Rothman will cover:  The kinds of attacks you face, and why traditional detection/prevention is failing.  The importance of limiting what unsophisticated users can do on computing devices.  How to roll out a least privilege approach without losing your job. Register Now - The BeyondTrust Team P.S. Don't have an hour to dedicate? Spend just 5 minutes getting familiar with out technology via 1 of our demo videos . Web Event: Restricting User Privileges w/ Mike Rothman Topic: Mike Rothman will discuss using one part technology when restricting user privilege (to not totally break the user experience) and one part persuasion to assure business folks they will still get their job done, but more securely. Date/Time:  Wednesday, November 20th @ 10am PT / 1pm ET / 5pm GMT Can't make this time? Register anyway and we'll send you the recording. To unsubscribe from future emails or to manage your e-mail preferences click here . BeyondTrust | 550 West C Street, Suite 1650 San Diego, CA 92101 www.beyondtrust.com | 1.866.339.3732 | Privacy Policy --


U should book himSent on the run Begin forwarded message:From: Lynda Resnick Date: October 17, 2014 at 4:48:09 PM PDTTo: "Mosko, Steve" Subject: A book party for Norman LearReply-To: "aferry@sunsethouse90210.net" Paperless Post Mailing For: Steve Mosko View invitation: www.paperlesspost.com/events/8895017-9a8635a5/replies/159936557-de0100d0 View on map Add to Google Calendar, Outlook, iCal , Yahoo Calendar Access event on the go: Get the iPad and iPhone app Norman Lear Book Party Monday, October 20th from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM Sunset House 9481 Sunset Boulevard, Beverly Hills, CA Block this sender from your Paperless Post mail Add paperlesspost@paperlesspost.com to your address book to ensure you receive all future emails from Paperless Post in your inbox. Click here to stop receiving emails from Paperless Post including invitations and cards. View the Paperless Post privacy policy. --


att.com | Support | Log In AT&T payment confirmation Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for using AT&T online payments. You submitted the following payment(s) for your account. Payment Method Confirmation Payment Date Amount BankDraft BD1MVD9P6Q7U7CP 03/18/2013 $1488.57 For more information about payment please see the attachment. Thank you, AT&T Online Services www.att.com/smallbusiness Contact Us AT&T Support - quick & easy support is available 24/7. Online Info View our Special Offers to check out our best promotions. Questions? Questions or comments? Do not reply to this email, as it is automatically generated. Please contact us or Ask a Question using our online self-help tool. Repair| Auto Pay| Paperless Billing| Move Your Service PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE All replies are automatically deleted. For questions regarding this message, refer to the contact information listed above. 2012. AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. Subsidiaries and affiliates of AT&T Inc. provide products and services under the AT&T brand. Privacy Policy ZPAY_7CDOAR


Thanks for the mail Alan! [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 – MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Alan Rosenblatt Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 5:51 PM To: Miranda, Luis Cc: Paustenbach, Mark Subject: Re: Points from Talkers Call I suggest we push the #DangerousDonald hashtag hard on social media. Also, I started using #TrumpsterDiving today and got reaction Alan Rosenblatt, Ph.D. Sr. VP for Digital Strategy, turner4D AlanRosenblatt@Gmail.com m) 703.282.7157 @drdigipol Alan@turner4D.com turner4D.com @turner4D Sent from my phone On May 6, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: Thanks to everyone who was able to join the call. Here is the broad messaging framework we discussed. We'll also send regular updated talking points as usual. Have a great weekend, - Luis. Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 – MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC Divisive and Dangerous: Donald Trump Lacks the Judgment or Temperament to be President Donald Trump's recklessness would hurt our economy, diminish our standing in the world, and make our communities less safe. Trump is dangerous, and he lacks the judgment or temperament to be president. His impending nomination is a reminder that for years the Republican Party has elevated extreme voices, using divisive campaigns that sought to exploit unfounded fears for political gain. And just like Republicans in Washington have done for years, Dangerous Donald is only looking out for himself. His plans would benefit those at the very top and would drag our country back to where we were when the last Republican president left office losing 800,000 jobs a month. The American people can't afford to let him bully his way into the Oval Office. Dangerous Donald Trump has already damaged America's relationships across the globe. His record of denigrating women has only gotten worse throughout this campaign, at the same time that his divisive rhetoric has made our communities less safe. And his business record is riddled with embarrassing failures that make it clear the American people can't afford to let him get anywhere near the White House. National Security: Even as a candidate, Dangerous Donald has damaged America's relationships across the globe. In the White House, he would undeniably make America less safe. · Donald Trump has no foreign policy experience and rather than seeking the advice of well-respected experts, Trump relies on his own misinformed ideas and in his own words, on his "good brain." · Trump has falsely claimed that he knows "more about ISIS than the generals" and recommended that the U.S. military commit international war crimes. · Trump's threat to pull back from our most important military alliances like NATO, pull aid from our allies like Israel, and his gushing praise for dictators would put our country on a dangerous path. · Trump has refused to rule out using nuclear weapons on European territory, and wants to allow countries that don't currently have nuclear weapons to get them, reversing long-held goals of international nuclear disarmament. Wrong on Women: Donald Trump has a decades-long record of denigrating women and promoting misogyny. His policies would make it harder for women to make their own choices when it comes to their healthcare or their career. · Trump once said you had to treat women "like s**t" and has spent decades doing so himself by calling women names – "fat pig," "slob," or "bimbo" – and saying a man needs a woman to support him at home rather than always be "griping and bitching." · Trump would take away a woman's right to make her own healthcare choices and has said women who had abortions should be punished – but not the doctors that performed them – and opposed exceptions for health of the mother because he thought women would use a cold as an excuse to have an abortion. · Trump thinks ensuring equal pay for women should just be left up to "the marketplace" and once suggested family leave policies should actually be scaled back and noted pregnancy was "an inconvenience for a business." Trump complained that when he employed mothers, they were not giving him "100 percent." Divisive and Dangerous: Donald Trump exploited racial anxieties and cultural fears in the pursuit of getting elected – to the point where his rallies have sparked violence against people of color, protestors, and the media. · Trump spouts hateful and dangerous lies about Muslims and called to surveil mosques, to ban Muslims from entering the country and to create a database of all Muslims in America – including U.S. citizens – and could not answer when pressed on how this would be any different from Nazi Germany. · Trump called Mexican immigrants "rapists" and criminals and said they brought disease into the country, said you needed to check if Native Americans were "real Indians," and claimed that a "well-educated black has a tremendous advantage" – but apparently not an advantage in finding housing in Trump properties, because in the 1970s, the Trump Organization was sued for discriminating against Blacks and Puerto Ricans. · Trump has been endorsed by former KKK leader David Duke, and his candidacy has been used as a recruiting tool for the white supremacist movement, which is no surprise since Trump refused to disavow David Duke and the KKK four times in one interview. · Trump has fostered violence against protestors at his rallies, suggesting that a Black Lives Matter protester maybe "should have been roughed up," promising to pay the legal fees if someone would "knock the hell" out of a protester and reminiscing about the old days when a protester would be "carried off on a stretcher." · Trump repeatedly threatened the First Amendment by calling to "open up" libel laws so he could sue reporters whenever they printed a story he did not like, made it a practice of banning media outlets he did not like from covering his rallies, and thought "closing" parts of the Internet was a rational strategy to combat ISIS. Bad at Business, Bad for the Economy: Though he plays the part of a wealthy and successful businessman, Dangerous Donald's real life record is riddled with embarrassing failures and cheap schemes designed to turn a quick buck at the expense of everyday Americans. · Despite his tough talk on trade deals and the loss of American jobs, Donald Trump manufactured his clothing line in countries he rails against, like China and Mexico. · Dangerous Donald owes everything to the tens of millions of dollars in loans and bailouts he received from his family. · Dangerous Donald's businesses have repeatedly gone bankrupt, leaving investors, contractors and small businesses holding the bag for his disastrous business decisions. · During one of his business bankruptcies, his personal finances were at the mercy of banks who put him on an "allowance" of $400,000 per month. · His Trump "University" fleeced thousands of Americans simply looking to get ahead. · Trump's unfounded predictions of recession under President Obama and warnings against investing in the stock market are reckless. · Economists have actually predicted Trump's policies could start an international trade war and even destabilize the global economy . · Trump's tax plan would overwhelmingly benefit the rich while costing the country $9.5 trillion to implement -- more than any other Republican plan proposed. It also violates his pledge not to increase the national debt. · Trump actually said at one of the Republican Party's debates that "wages are too high" and opposed raising the minimum wage · Trump wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which would jeopardize health care for 20 million Americans who've been able to get coverage under Obamacare. Republicans couldn't unite against him and failed to stand up to him during their primary because they were playing to the same extreme base of their party. Democrats will be united and hold Donald Trump accountable every day until November 8th. To be automatically unsubscribed from this list, please email: talkers-unsubscribe@dnc.org


Give us 15 minutes, Pablo, but I think we'll pull down New Day. [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Manriquez, Pablo Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 3:31 PM To: Bonosky, Garret Cc: Banfill, Ryan; House Anna Stolitzka; Kate Houghton; Miranda, Luis; Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric Subject: Re: DWS tomorrow in NYC Roger, no prob. Thank you! On May 2, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Bonosky, Garret > wrote: 7:00pm-9:00pm CBS hit is not doable. We are going to be at jfk and on a flight. Garret Bonosky Deputy Director Office of the Chair Democratic National Committee On May 2, 2016, at 3:23 PM, Banfill, Ryan > wrote: Bumping to you for availability ... Note Dan Raviv CBS Radio interview added Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Manriquez, Pablo" > Date: May 2, 2016 at 3:19:42 PM EDT To: "Miranda, Luis" >, "Paustenbach, Mark" >, "Walker, Eric" >, Ryan Banfill > Subject: Re: DWS tomorrow in NYC Just added her usual CBS Radio interview with Dan Raviv. I really need some guidance here on which of these I'm locking in and which I'm pitching elsewhere... On May 2, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Manriquez, Pablo > wrote: Starting the chain. Let me know what we can do and I'll start locking them in. OPEN - Fox News Latino Election Invite with Henry Munoz 6AM hour - CNN New Day 7PM hour - Fox News Super Tues Special 7-9PM hours - CBS radio interview 8:35PM - Fox News Radio hit Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


Dear PayPal User It has come to our attention that your PayPal account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. To update your PayPal account records click on the following link:  Thank you for your patience in this matter. Sincerely, Ammy Handor,PayPal Inc. Access Security Departament. Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. Copyright 2005, PayPal INC. All Rights Reserved.


thanks Phil--yes, that's perfect. I just wanted to have some idea of the paper, that's more than enough info. I wouldn't bother worrying about scanning in, etc. I should have a draft letter for you to comment on within a few days or so, after I return from Trieste, talk to you later, mike [1]P.Jones@uea.ac.uk wrote: Mike, Thanks. The 1980/1981 papers. I don't have the pdfs. 1980: This paper looked (spatially) at temperatures and precipitation for the 5 warmest years during the 20th century and the 5 coldest. We then differenced these to produce what might happen. We expanded this in a DoE Tech Report to look at the warmest/coldest 20-year periods. This latter effort didn't make much difference. 1981: This looked at statistics of annual/winter/summer Temperatures for the NH and zones of the NH to see what signals might you be able to detect. SNR problem really. Showed that best place to detect was NH annual and also Tropics in summer. Last place to look was the Arctic because variability was so high. I did look a while ago to see if Nature had back scanned these papers, but they hadn't. Is the above enough? I have hard copies of these two papers - in Norwich Cheers Phil Hi Phil, thanks---yes, revised bibliography looks great. I'll can send you a copy of my nominating letter for comment/suggestions when done. also--can you provide one or two sentences about the '80 and '81 Nature articles w/ Wigley so that I might be able to work this briefly into the narrative of my letter? thanks, mike [2]P.Jones@uea.ac.uk wrote: Mike. Will this do? Have added in a section on D&A. You didn't send the narrative. Will I have to alter that? Hope to get out of AVL at 5pm tonight - thunderstorms permitting. Cheers Phil HI Phil, OK--thanks, I'll just go w/ the H=62. That is an impressive number and almost certainly higher than the vast majority of AGU Fellows. I've attached the 2 page bibliography. I think it would be good to add some some of the more prominent D&A type papers, especially those early ones because they seem to be ahead of their time, and it is a high profile topic (more so than hydrology!). but its your call. Enjoy Asheville--say hi to Tom for me. talk to you later, mike [4]P.Jones@uea.ac.uk wrote: Mike, Off to the US tomorrow for 1.5 days in Asheville. On 1, this is what people call the H index. I've tried working this out and there is software for it on the web of science. Problem is my surname. I get a number of 62 if I just use the software, but I have too many papers. I then waded through and deleted those in journals I'd never heard of and got 52. I think this got rid of some biologist from the 1970s/1980s, so go with 52. I don't have pdfs of the early papers. I won't be able to do anything for a few days either. When do you want this in, by the way? Can you email me the piece I wrote for you, as I don't have this on my lap top. I can then pick it up tomorrow at some airport. The D&A work has always been with others. There is another area on hydrology that I omitted as well. Keith's daughter is OK. She had the operation last Tuesday. He should be over in Birmingham this weekend. Cheers Phil Hi Phil, I'm continuing to work on your nomination package (here in my hotel room in Trieste--the weather isn't any good!). If its possible for a case to be too strong, we may have that here! Lonnie is also confirmed as supporting letter writer, along w/ Kevin, Ben, Tom K, and Jean J. (4 of the 5 are already AGU fellows, which I'm told is important! Surprisingly, Ben is not yet, nor am I. But David Thompson is (quite young for one of these). I'm guessing Mike Wallace and Susan Solomon might have had something to do w/ that ;) Anyway, I wanted to check w/ you on two things: 1. One thing that people sometimes like to know is the maximum value of "N" where "N" is the number of papers an individual authored/co-authored that have more than N citations. N=40 (i.e., an individual has published at least 40 papers that have each been cited at least 40 times) is supposedly an important threshold for admission in the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. I'm guessing your N is significantly greater than that, and it would be nice to cite that if possible. Would you mind figuring out that number and sending--I think it would be useful is really sealing the case. 2. Would you mind considering a minor revision of your 2 page bibliography. In my nomination letter, I'm trying to underscore the diverse areas where you've made major contributions, and I think its well known and obvious to many that two of these are instrumental data and paleoclimate reconstructions. But it occurs to me that it is equally important to stress your work in detection of anthropogenic impacts on climate w/ both models and observations. For example, your early Nature papers w/ Wigley. in '80 and '81 seem to be among the earliest efforts to try to do this (though I don't have copies of the papers, so can't read them!), and that seems very much worth highlighting to me. My suggestion is that you add a category on "Anthropogenic Climate Signal" detection and include this work (say, 8 or so of the key papers in this area including the two early Nature one's w/ Wigley) as well as some of your later work w/ Santer/Tett/Thorne/Hegerl/Barnett. I realize that most of your work in this area isn't as primary author, but I do think it would be helpful to show this side of your research, and I'd like to incorporate that into my nomination letter (i.e. how critical your efforts have been to developments in areas such as D&A). You could still fit this onto 2 pages by making the font smaller for the references (10pt rather than 11 pt) while keeping the headings at 11 pt, and if necessary you could probably sacrifice a few of the surface temperature record references to make space for the additional references. Also, if you happen to have pdfs of the two early Wigley papers, or even just the text for the abstracts, it would be great to have a little more detail about those papers so I can appropriately work them into the narrative of my letter. thanks for any help, mike p.s. please tell Keith I was very sorry he was unable to make it here to Trieste, I was really looking forward to seeing him (as were Ed and many others here). I hope all is well w/ his daughter. -- Michael E. Mann Associate Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [7]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 [9] tm -- Michael E. Mann Associate Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [11]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 [13] .htm -- Michael E. Mann Associate Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [14]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 [15] -- Michael E. Mann Associate Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: [16]mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013 [17] References 1. mailto:P.Jones@uea.ac.uk 2. mailto:P.Jones@uea.ac.uk 3. mailto:P.Jones@uea.ac.uk 4. mailto:P.Jones@uea.ac.uk 5. mailto:mid:1079.87.113.67.115.1212941466.squirrel@webmail.uea.ac.uk 6. mailto:mann@psu.edu 7. mailto:mann@psu.edu 8.  9.  10. mailto:mann@psu.edu 11. mailto:mann@psu.edu 12.  13.  14. mailto:mann@psu.edu 15.  16. mailto:mann@psu.edu 17.


Dear Customer, MCT Federal Credit Union kindly asks you to take part in our quick online survey. In return we will credit $50.00 to your account - Just for your time! With the information collected we can decide to direct a number of changes to improve and expand our services. The information you provide us is all non-sensitive and anonymous - No part of it is handed down to any third party. It will be stored in our secure database for maximum 7 days while we process the results of this nationwide survey. We kindly ask you to spare two minutes of your time in taking part with this unique offer! To continue click or copy in your explorer address bar the link below: Copyright © 2006-2007 MCT Federal Credit Union. All rights reserved.


---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mack-D Date: May 1, 2008 4:41 AM Subject: Hello from Cadillac Michigan To: commander@newsaxon.org, nsmhaysville88@yahoo.com, brianholland@usa.com, nsm88_vikingyouth@yahoo.com Hello. I am a white male individual from Cadillac, Michigan. Here, in northern michigan, the individuals possess very strong wills for the white pride movement. Though I do not consider myself a Nazi or skinhead, I am very proud of my white/German heritage, and also am a VERY strong socialist (as far as economics and politics are concerned). As a worker in the healthcare field (I am a Nuclear Medicine Technologist), I do my part to care for other individuals in my local area and am very proud to provide my contribution to the children of the forefathers who led this great country to the nation (even though I am disgusted with the healthcare in America today). I am sending this e-mail as a white socialist, and I believe that this party can use national health care as a great benefit in it's campaign for a better America. I think that healthcare for the people of Germany, would have been one of the party's great plans if their desired outcome would have prospired. America is the only country (besides South Africa...and some other African countries) that does NOT have national healthcare, and I believe it is the job of the white people, the ancestors of the forefather's of our nation, to bring that to our people! We can spread the word, and bring health and wellness to our people in this time of need, during a time when this economy is down, during a time when the majority of people do not have health insurance, and are suffering in pain and sickness for the nation they helped build! My uncle (my mother's brother), who's UNCLE fought for the Germans during WW2 (my great uncle...god bless him may he rest in peace as of 1994), DIED last week due to the fact from cancer....a form of cancer he could have received chemotherapy and radiation treatment for....but could not due to the lack of payment, DESPITE the fact that he had worked for a company that built equipment for our own Military for 30 years! It is OUR job to bring socialism to the nation. Of course, if America did receive national healthcare, there would of course be limits....such as no drug addicts and ONLY American citizens. Ya, we probably would have to give some healthcare to the other 'citizens', the African-Americans and what not, but that is a small price to pay to give healthcare to our own brothers and sisters of America, our own blood who are suffering in this country, as it were some third-world country in Africa. We do not want our OWN PEOPLE suffering like the African's....thats what makes us strong! The way we treat our own! National Healthcare is the #1 LARGEST selling point of National Socialism, and I think that it should be the new #1 campaign movement for the party, as it would recruit more people then one could ever imagine! As a white, German Nuclear Medicine Technologist (I'm also a Registered Nurse and Hospice worker), I am asking you to please contact me back. Because I believe that I could make a difference. As an educated professional, I could be one of the spokesman for this National Healthcare movement. Just look at Sweden, Finland, Germany, Norway......they ALL have excellent national Heatlhcare!!!! And there is NO reason a country such as america should let it's very own children suffer from sickness, cancer, or die of the common flu!!!! This movement would be a great benifit to the party. There are many individuals of the national socialist movement here in Cadillac, Michigan who would be able to spread the word...to conservatives and liberals alike! Please contact me back, Although i am not a skinhead, I am a very good speaker, am articulate, and do believe I would be able to make anybody listen and follow for the American socialist movement, Thank you, Michael McDonald -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


How would you like a 100% tax free Investment in Oil and Gas wells? Make over 100% annually and receive monthly tax free Income with very low risk. If you are liquid for a $10,000 investment, email your name, address, and phone number to oilandgaspackage@aol.com and we will send you the information ================================================================= To Unsubscribe from these special mailings: Forward this mail with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line to oilandgasremoval@aol.com ================================================================= fghludnbnobfmohbvmsojkdkkf


Announcement: Press Release: *National Socialist Movement Organizing March Against Illegal Immigration on Washington DC* On April 19th 2008 the National Socialist Movement and other Patriotic Americans intend to lead a march and protest against the illegal invasion of America to our Nations Capitol. We march on Washington DC to send a message to the crooked Politicians of both the corrupt Democratic and Republican Parties. Our message is listen to the citizens of this Nation who elected you, listen to them and close the Borders or you will be replaced! We as Americans demand that our Nations Borders are closed, and that an America First Policy is enacted. We are calling out to all proud Americans to join us in this mass protest. The system cannot ignore hundreds of angry citizens marching on the Nations Capitol. Stand with us as we confront those who wish to turn our Nation into a third world melting pot! In 2008 the Immigration issue will be at the forefront. Anyone with eyes and ears can bear witness to the changing face of our Nation. This will be the opportunity of a lifetime for Pro-White and Pro-American activists to make themselves heard. No excuses, no half measures, simply put BE THERE! All side issues, disagreements, and other matters will be cast aside on April 19th. All are invited to this Historical event. All groups, Political Parties, etc. that wish to endorse or participate are welcome and will be considered as speakers should they wish to participate. A Historical endeavor of this proportion has not been tackled by the "so-called" Far Right here in America in many years. Our counterparts in Europe put hundreds and often thousands of Patriots into the streets to demonstrate for their rights, and make their voices heard. On April 19th, 2008 it is our time. Do not let opportunity this pass you by, see you in Washington DC on April 19th. -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


DON'T MISS OUT ON AN AMAZING BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY AND WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCT! PLEASE VISIT www.good4u.autodreamteam.com THERE IS NO OBLIGATION AND IT'S WORTH A LOOK!


Confirm your Account Confirm your Apple Account. Dear member, We have faced some problems with your account, please click the link below to reactive your account, If you do not update it will be Closed. To update your account, just confirm your informations, It's easy: Click Here to Update You can use your Αpple ID to; shop the iTunes Store, buy from the Αpple 0nline Store, make a reservation at an Αpple Retail Store, and access Αpple support.Learn more about your new Αpple ID. To edit the personal information associated with your Αpple ID, please visit the My Αpple ID website and sign in with your Αpple ID and password. To learn how Αpple collects, uses, and safeguards the personal information you provide, please review the Αpple Customer Privacy Policy. TM and copyright © 2017 Apple Inc. 1 Infinite Loop, MS 83-DM, Cupertino, CΑ 95014. All Rights Reserved / Keep Informed / Privacy Policy / My Αpple ID


Behind Girl Christopher were seven other counts of first-degree murder. caucasus claudia Yeah."Divorced after a short illness,�Paul muttered, and again looked up, thinking he heard an approaching car. It was a skunk. "A ways,�she said vaguely, looking off toward the window. "It's the State Police,�she said. "Oh, SURE! Nasty as a hand-job in a sleazy bar, fine as a fuck from the world's most talented call-girl. His apartment was 9-E, farthest from the elevator, and today the corridor looked two miles long. conn


Hi all, I cannot to get this to run... I think I am mistaking some basic concept or I have a big brain-lock . Somebody know what is the problem to execute this function ? Thanks in advance... --==================================== DROP TABLE test; CREATE TABLE test ( clave numeric(7,0) not null, PRIMARY KEY (clave) ) WITHOUT OIDS; --==================================== DROP FUNCTION f_test(numeric(7,0), numeric(7,0)); CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_test(numeric(7,0), numeric(7,0)) RETURNS timestamp AS ' DECLARE p_datod ALIAS FOR $1; p_datoh ALIAS FOR $2; -- tdesde timestamp; thasta timestamp; BEGIN tdesde := now(); -- FOR X IN p_datod..p_datoh LOOP INSERT INTO test VALUES (x); END LOOP; -- thasta := now() - tdesde; RETURN thasta; COMMIT; END; ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; --==================================== select f_test(1,9); ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org


Organization Announcement (Correction) I apologize for the confusion and inconvenience my mistake caused. I had indicated that Kenneth Lovejoy would be supporting EES, but this is not correct. Ken will be supporting OEC. Corrected announcement is provided below. It is my pleasure to announce that Kenneth Lovejoy has joined Enron Corp. EH&S Asset Operations. He will be reporting directly to Donnie Willmann and will support Central America, Caribbean and OEC. Ken has over 25 year experience in environmental, health and safety for the oil and gas industry. He has been working for Enron since 1996 and has extensive international experience. We are excited to have Ken in our team so, please welcome Ken in his new role. Henry Van


Dear PayPal Member, During our regularly schedule account maintenance and verification we have detected a slight error in your billing information on file with PayPal. This might be due to either following reasons: - A recent change in your personal information (i.e. change of address) - Submitting invalid information during the initial sign up process. - An inability to accurately verify your selected option of payment due an internal error within our processors. Therefore your account has been temporarily suspended. We need you to confirm your identity in order to regain full privileges of your account. If this is not completed by June 28, 2006, we reserve the right to terminate all privileges of your account indefinitly, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. We thank you for your cooperation in this manner. To confirm your identity please follow the link below: Thank you for your patience in this matter. PayPal - Customer Service Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.


Dear eBay member, Congratulations! Your recent selling activity entitles you to Silver status in the eBay PowerSeller Program. Your membership comes with some great benefits and services: See the PowerSeller icon next to your User ID Free seller phone support, Monday-Friday, 6am-6pm PST. Get exclusive offerings on the PowerSeller portal--check back often for updates! Network on the exclusive PowerSeller Discussion Board. Download free business templates for PowerSeller business cards and letterhead. Be sure to sign up today--it's FREE! Visit www.ebay.com/powerseller and click "Member Sign In." Again, congratulations and best wishes for your continued success! Sincerely, eBay PowerSeller Team eBay sent this communication to you because of your outstanding feedback, high sales, and good account standing. If you would not like to be invited to join the PowerSeller program, follow the directions above, click "Member Sign In", and then click "Decline" at the bottom of the page. Please note that it may take up to 10 days to process your request. Visit our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have any questions. Learn More to protect yourself from Spoof (fake) e-mails. Copyright © 2007 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc. eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


What: TV – FOX BIZ "Mornings with Maria" When: Friday, 20 May, 7am or 8am ET Where: TBD Format: Live Who: Maria Bartiromo, Anchor/Reporter Topic: State of the Race Staff: TBD Contact: TBD TIMELINE: Arrival Time: TBD Makeup: TBD Hit Time: TBD Cleared: TBD Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


You've been hand selected to access this exclusive work-at-home information for FREE! You are receiving this mailing because you are a member of SendGreatOffers.com and subscribed as:JM@NETNOTEINC.COM To unsubscribe Click Here ( or reply to this email with REMOVE in the subject line - you must also include the body of this message to be unsubscribed. Any correspondence about the products/services should be directed to the company in the ad. %EM%JM@NETNOTEINC.COM%/EM%


Box Office: 'Divergent' delivers, Muppets stumble Los Angeles Times Entertainment Breaking News Box Office: 'Divergent' delivers, Muppets stumble Los Angeles Times | March 23, 2014 | 1:01 PM Any talk of a curse on young-adult film franchises was put on hold this weekend with the estimated $56-million opening for "Divergent," the first adaptation from a series of novels by Veronica Roth, while "Muppets Most Wanted" underperformed with $16.5 million and "God's Not Dead" surprised some with a strong turnout from faith-based audiences. For more box office information, go to latimes.com/companytown. ADVERTISEMENT


Courtney and I have been talking, she knows. And I'm on the minute by minute scheduling email Garrett sends, so I can tell you when she's picking up her bags at the airport down to when I see her this afternoon. Zachary Allen (301) 651-5222 Sent from my iPhone > On May 3, 2016, at 7:55 AM, Kaplan, Jordan wrote: > > It's not noted on her schedule. Make sure they know you are coming. > > Jordan Kaplan > National Finance Director > Democratic National Committee > (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) > kaplanj@dnc.org > > >> On May 3, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Zach Allen wrote: >> >> I am >> >> Zachary Allen >> (301) 651-5222 >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On May 3, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Kaplan, Jordan wrote: >>> >>> Why aren't you in the George meeting? >>> >>> Jordan Kaplan >>> National Finance Director >>> Democratic National Committee >>> (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) >>> kaplanj@dnc.org >>>


For Immediate Release May 4, 2016 Contact - DNC Press 202-863-8148 DNC Chair's Statement on Reports That John Kasich is Suspending his Campaign for President "With Governor Kasich out of the race, any remaining hope the GOP had of concealing its true colors behind his comparatively friendly-faced candidacy has evaporated. But make no mistake, the extreme policies for which he has long fought, are virtually indistinguishable from those of Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and the rest of the modern Republican Party. "Under Kasich, Ohio's job growth has trailed the national average for 40 straight months. He promised to fight any federal increase in the minimum wage. And he has one of the most extreme anti-choice records of any governor in the country, having signed legislation that shut down half the abortion clinics in his state. "For years, Republican leaders have employed a divisive political strategy to compel people to vote out of distrust, suspicion and hate - rewarding those at the top and denigrating women, minorities, the LGBT community and more in the process. The result is the cynical, divided, bickering Republican base we see now. Today, the only energy left in the Republican primary isn't for anything, it's against everything that doesn't line up with their extreme views. The obstruction and broken government we're seeing in Washington is the result. "The contrast couldn't be more stark. Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are fighting for the American people - for higher wages, for more opportunity, for a level playing field and for a brighter future. Our voters are energized, enthusiastic, and optimistic because our candidates are committed to moving America forward. And that's why we're going to win on Election Day in November." ###


Bruno Muschitiello updated #UZL-260-81253 ----------------------------------------- Staff (Owner): Bruno Muschitiello (was: -- Unassigned --) Status: In Progress (was: Open) Can't upgrade the PC agent because of analysis software. -------------------------------------------------------- Ticket ID: UZL-260-81253 URL: Full Name: devilangel Email: devilangel1004@gmail.com Creator: User Department: General Staff (Owner): Bruno Muschitiello Type: Issue Status: In Progress Priority: Medium Template Group: Default Created: 12 September 2013 10:08 AM Updated: 12 September 2013 10:08 AM Hi, recently I got a target PC. But I can't upgrade the PC agent because of analysis software. The error message is "The target device contains malware analysis software. Please contact HT support immediately.". Refer following information. I think it's because of winpcap lilbrary. But there is no analysis software, just like wireshark, process explorer. (I know your agent can avoid Avira Anti-virus program.) Can I upgrade the agent? Thanks. Regards. Content: CPU: 1 x Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 925 @ 2.30GHz Architecture: 32-bit RAM: 532MB free / 986MB total (46% used) Hard Disk: 66897MB free / 76308MB total Windows Version: Microsoft Windows XP (Service Pack 2) (32-bit) Registered to: {55274-649-6478953-23754} Locale: (UTC 03:00) User Info: [ADMIN] SID: Application List (x86): Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional (7.0.0) Adobe Flash Player 11 ActiveX (11.8.800.168) Windows Driver Package - Intel Corporation (ialm) Display (07/23/2012 6.14.10.5420) (07/23/2012 6.14.10.5420) Avira AntiVir PersonalEdition Classic Microsoft Office Enterprise 2007 (12.0.4518.1014) FLV Player 2.0 (build 25) (2.0 (build 25)) Google Chrome (29.0.1547.66) HP LaserJet Professional P1100-P1560-P1600 Series High Definition Audio Driver Package - KB888111 (20040219.000000) Microsoft Text-to-Speech Engine MTN Mobile Internet (21.005.11.04.286) Orbit Downloader Registry Reviver (3.0.1.108) Microsoft Speech API 4.0 TuneUp Utilities 2013 (13.0.3020.7) VLC media player 2.0.8 (2.0.8) WinPcap 4.1.3 (4.1.0.2980) WinRAR archiver YTD Video Downloader 4.5 (4.5) Atheros Communications Inc.(R) AR81Family Gigabit/Fast Ethernet Driver (1.0.0.43) kToken RTE 1.0 (1.00.0000) Virtual CD v9 (9.00.1) DriverPack Solution Lite version 13 (13) HP Deskjet Printer Driver Software 9.0 (9.0) Realtek High Definition Audio Driver (5.10.0.6136) ApplicationList (x64): Staff CP: --


A Dialogue with Frost & Sullivan's Senior Industry Analyst, Energy Markets & Industry Analyst and Program Lead, Telecom and Bandwidth Services Thursday, November 1st eSource is pleased to host our first Analyst Summit to share insights into the Energy and Telecom/Bandwidth Markets Please join Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz, Senior Industry Analyst, Energy Markets & Rod Woodward, Industry Analyst, Telecom Services & Program Lead, Wholesale Services He has authored a report on U.S. Bandwidth Services (Trading/Brokering/Online Exchanges) Download report for free at  at 3:30 - 5:30 PM EB 5C2 Each presentation will last 35 minutes with 20 minutes Q&A Agenda - Energy 3:30-4:30 ? Frost & Sullivan capabilities - 10 minutes ? Energy speaker: New Region Challenges for Retail Electric Providers - 25 minutes Development of transactional capability Acquiring customers Quick survey of offers online in ERCOT region Rate offerings will be limited by current meter capabilities ERCOT Retail Providers Forecasting load ? Questions & Answers - 20 minutes Agenda - Telecom/Broadband 4:30-5:30 ? Frost & Sullivan capabilities - 10 minutes ? Telecom/Broadband speaker: Industry Insights - 25 minutes Role of "Utilicom"/Energy providers in telecom Overall wholesale market perspective Overview of data services market Insight and update on bandwidth trading services ? Questions & Answers 20 minutes Please RSVP to Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928


Plan a group getaway—book a vacation rental on TripAdvisor Trouble viewing this e-mail? Vacation Rentals October 2014 Find your perfect place Explore > Here are the most popular spots with Los Angeles travelers Palm Springs, California From $91/nt* See all rentals > Santa Barbara, California From $128/nt* See all rentals > San Francisco, California From $132/nt* See all rentals > Great getaways for groupsVacation rentals that sleep 8 or more people. Vail, Colorado Key West, Florida Sevierville, Tennessee Outer Banks, North Carolina Kihei, Hawaii Providenciales, Caribbean With millions of traveler reviews,TripAdvisor makes any destination better Search all rentals > Help other travelers choose the perfect rental Leave a review > *Rates are subject to change and may vary by date and availability. Minimum stay may be required. Go to TripAdvisor | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. If you have questions or need assistance, please ask us here . TripAdvisor LLC, 141 Needham Street, Newton, MA 02464, USA © 2014 TripAdvisor LLC. All rights reserved. TripAdvisor, the TripAdvisor logo, the Owl logo and Get The Truth. Then Go. are either registered trademarks or trademarks of TripAdvisor LLC in the U.S. and/or other countries. Trouble viewing this e-mail? Vacation Rentals Find your perfect place Explore > Here are the most popular spots with Los Angeles travelers Palm Springs, California — From $91/nt* See all rentals Santa Barbara, California — From $128/nt* See all rentals San Francisco, California — From $132/nt* See all rentals Great getaways for groupsVacation rentals that sleep 8 or more people. Vail, Colorado Key West, Florida Sevierville, Tennessee Outer Banks, North Carolina Kihei, Hawaii Providenciales, Caribbean With millions of traveler reviews,TripAdvisor makes any destination better Search all rentals > Help other travelers choose the perfect rental Leave a review > *Rates are subject to change and may vary by date and availability. Minimum stay may be required. Go to TripAdvisor | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Contact Us Please do not reply directly to this e-mail. This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. If you have questions or need assistance, please ask us here . TripAdvisor LLC, 141 Needham Street, Newton, MA 02464, USA © 2014 TripAdvisor LLC. All rights reserved. TripAdvisor, the TripAdvisor logo, the Owl logo and Get The Truth. Then Go. are either registered trademarks or trademarks of TripAdvisor LLC in the U.S. and/or other countries.


Tracy, I have reversed the signs on the CF schedule as you requested. Chris


Dear Bank of the West client, Bank of the West Customer Service requests you to complete Bank of the West Business/Corporate Customer Details Update Form. This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of Bank of the West. Please select the hyperlink and visit the address listed to access Bank of the West Business/Corporate Customer Details Update Form. Again, thank you for choosing Bank of the West for your business needs. We look forward to working with you. ***** Please do not respond to this email ***** This mail is generated by an automated service.Replies to this mail are not read by Bank of the West Customer Service or technical support. -------------------------------------------------- stack:


Hey dude: Will let you know if I encounter any last minute openings. The tickets have been tougher than usual this year bc so many reporters seem to be inviting their campaign sources - so the pool of potential invitees is somewhat larger than usual. But, if something opens up, I will absolutely keep them in mind. Thanks for reaching out. Hope all is well over there. Josh -----Original Message----- From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 11:25 AM To: Earnest, Joshua R. R. EOP/WHO Subject: WHCD? Hey Josh, I'm already in at WHCD as is the Chair. However, if you have extra slots you get for those back tables for junior staff, it would be great if we could take care of extra DNC comm staffers who as you know I've made sure are aggressive about touting the progress we've made over the last 7 years. * Eric Walker, Deputy Communications Director, walkere@dnc.org * Rachel Palermo, Press Assistant, PalermoR@dnc.org * Pablo Manriquez, Media Booker, ManriquezP@dnc.org * Jenna Price, Press Assistant, PriceJ@dnc.org Thanks for anything you can do. Hope you're well. - Luis. Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC