4/26/2016 NATIONAL VIDEO REPORT CBS This Morning There was a report about Donald Trump attacking Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance. The report also included a brief interview with Gov. John Kasich. [Watch ] There was an interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders. [Watch ] John Heilemann discussed Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance and the impact of Paul Manafort on Donald Trump's campaign. [Watch ] There was an interview with Pres. Barack Obama. [Part One ] [Part Two ] There was an interview with Speaker Paul Ryan. [Watch ] CBS Evening News There was a report about Donald Trump attacking Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance. [Watch ] There was an interview with Pres. Barack Obama. [Watch ] ABC Good Morning America There was a report about Donald Trump attacking Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance. [Watch ] There was a report about the Democratic primary. [Watch ] Jonathan Karl discussed the delegate math for the Republican and Democratic primaries. [Watch ] There was an interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders. [Watch ] ABC World News with David Muir There was a report about Donald Trump attacking Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance. [Watch ] There was a brief discussion about Jonathan Karl's interview with Charles Koch. [Watch ] NBC Today There was a report about Donald Trump attacking Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance and Sec. Hillary Clinton's MSNBC town hall. [Watch ] There was an interview with Gov. John Kasich. [Watch ] Chuck Todd discussed Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance and the delegate math for the Republican and Democratic primaries. [Watch ] NBC Nightly News There was a report about Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance. [Watch ] CNN New Day There was report on Donald Trump attacking Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich for teaming up against him. [Watch ] There was a report on if Sen. Bernie Sanders loses a lot of states tonight will he continue with his campaign. [Watch ] There was an interview with Bruce Poole. [Watch ] There was an interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders. [Watch ] There was an interview with Sean Spicer. [Watch ] Situation Room There was an interview with Katrina Pierson. [Watch ] There was an interview with Tana Goertz. [Watch ] AC 360 There was an interview with Gov. John Kasich. [Watch ] There was an interview with Sean Spicer. [Watch ] MSNBC Morning Joe Joe Scarborough called the GOP candidates a bunch of goofballs. [Watch ] Mike Barnicle discussed how the dialogue in the Republican primary has gone downhill. [Watch ] There was a brief discussion on Sen. Ted Cruz's low poll numbers in swing states. [Watch ] Mike Barnicle called Sen. Ted Cruz a "marginal, regional candidate." [Watch ] Mark Halperin said Donald Trump has been giving paid speeches for years. [Watch ] There was a segment on Gov. John Kasich's guide to eating. [Watch ] There was an interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders. [Watch ] There was a discussion on Sec. Hillary Clinton's hawkish foreign policy. [Watch ] Hardball With Chris Matthews There was an interview with Sec. Julian Castro. [Watch ] FOX Fox and Friends There was an interview with Donald Trump. [Watch ] There was a report on Donald Trump's strength heading into today's primary contests, yet 54 Pennsylvania delegates are uncommitted and all candidates will lobby their support. The report also discussed Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance falling apart. [Watch ] Steve Doocy said Sec. Hillary Clinton sounded "angry" while explaining she is ahead in votes during last night's MSNBC town hall. [Watch ] There was a report on Sen. Ted Cruz hoping to rebound in Indiana and the tough delegate math he has to make up. [Watch ] There was a report on Sec. Hillary Clinton criticizing Donald Trump's wealth and unrelatability to the middle class. [Watch ] There was a report on Maryland allowing ex-convicts to vote in today's primary. [Watch ] There was a report on children of refugees in America receiving more in federal benefits than children of poor Americans. [Watch ] There was an interview with Rep. Mike Kelly about Pennsylvania's delegate system, which he said is a problem because many delegates will not represent the will of the citizens. [Watch ] There was an interview with Joe Trippi about a reported short list of vice presidential candidates for Sec. Hillary Clinton. [Watch ] There was a report on the collapse of Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich's alliance. [Watch ] On the Record with Greta van Sustren There was an interview with Gov. Mike Huckabee. [Watch ] There was an interview with Dr. Ben Carson. [Watch ] There was an interview with Rick Santorum. [Watch ] Hannity There was an interview with Donald Trump and Eric Trump. [Watch ] There was an interview with Sen. Ted Cruz. [Watch ] There was an interview with Rudy Giuliani. [Watch ] UNIVISIÓN ¡Despierta América! There was a report on tonight's presidential primaries. The second report had a brief interview from Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart. [7:00 , 8:00 ] There was a report on the slow processing of immigration cases. [Watch ] Noticiero Univisión There was a report on Gov. John Kasich's alliance with Sen. Ted Cruz to deny primary victories to Donald Trump. The report also mentioned Charles Koch comment that he might support Sec. Hillary Clinton over any of the Republican presidential candidates. [Watch ] Noticias Univision Washington There was a report on tonight's presidential primaries. [Watch ] Noticiero Univisión: Edición Nocturna There was a report on tonight's presidential primaries. [Watch ] There was a report on Donald Trump's upcoming interview with Megyn Kelly. [Watch ] There was an interview with Rep. Joseph Crowley over his proposal to expand Temporary Protective Status to Ecuadorian undocumented immigrants following the devastating earthquake earlier this month. [Watch ] There was a report on protests over gender neutral bathrooms in Raleigh, NC, followed by a report on conservative criticism of Target's decision to allow gender-neutral bathrooms. [Watch ] TELEMUNDO Noticiero Telemundo There was a report on Gov. John Kasich's alliance with Sen. Ted Cruz to deny primary victories to Donald Trump. [Watch ] There was a report on President Barack Obama's condemnation of Donald Trump and his anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric. [Watch ] FBN Mornings with Maria There was an interview with Rep. Steve Scales [Watch ] PBS PBS NewsHour There was a panel on the state of the upcoming Democratic and Republican primaries. [Part 1 ] [Part 2 ] There was a panel on the state of the upcoming Democratic Maryland primary. [Watch ] ENTERTAINMENT ABC Jimmy Kimmel Live There was a panel on the state of the 2016 Democratic and Republican primaries. [Watch ] NBC The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon Jimmy Fallon talked about the state of the 2016 Democratic and Republican primaries. [Watch ] Late Night with Seth Meyers Seth Meyers talked about the state of the 2016 Democratic and Republican primaries. [Watch ] In the segment A Closer Look, Seth Meyers talked about the Donald Trump campaign. [Watch ] There was a segment called campaign slogans where Seth Meyers talked about the state of Donald Trump's campaign. [Watch ] CBS The Late Show with Stephen Colbert There was a segment on the Democratic and Republican primaries. [Watch ] The Late Late Show with James Corden James Corden mentions Donald Trump in his monologue which is a spoof of Beyonce's Lemonade. [Watch ] Comedy Central The Daily Show There was a segment on the state of the 2016 Democratic and Republican primaries. [Watch ] Comedy Central The Nightly Show There was a segment on the Flint Water Crisis. [Watch ] There was a segment on the 2016 primaries. [Watch ] There was a political panel that talked about the 2016 primaries. [Watch ] TBS Full Frontal with Samantha Bee There was a panel on the state of the Republican primary. [Watch ] Samantha Bee talked about the treasury changing the twenty-dollar bill with Harriet Tubman on the front and Andrew Jackson on the back. [Watch ] There was a segment on the state of the Democratic primary. [Watch ]


take a look at  Andrey mailto:andr@sandy.ru BM> Does anyone do this already? Or is this a new concept? Or has this concept BM> been discussed before and abandoned for some reasons that I don't yet know? BM> I use the physical architecture of a basic web application as an example in BM> this post, but this concept could of course be applied to most server BM> systems. It would allow for the hardware-separation of volatile and BM> non-volatile disk images. It would be analogous to performing nightly BM> ghosting operations, only it would be more efficient and involve less (or BM> no) downtime. BM> Thanks for any opinions, BM> Ben


Dear Chase OnlineSM Customer Dear Chase OnlineSM Customer: A message regarding "Updating Consumer Information" has been sent to your Secure Message Center. To see your message: Log on to Chase Online Message Center. Once you log on, you can see your new message in the Secure Message Center. The message will be available in your Secure Message Center until 09/22/2007. Please do not reply to this message. In order to keep your account information private and secure, we ask that you log on to Chase Online and visit the Secure Message Center if you wish to send an additional question or require further assistance. Thank you for being a valued Chase customer. www.chase.com/secure_cent=21ssologon?22chsus/sso_co_home.htm This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


Hi Caspar, Thanks for the comments. Frankly, Von storch is being duplicitous here. He may tell certain audiences (like the NCAR group last month) that he is not suggesting that the GKSS simulation is reealistic, because he knows he'll get skewered if he claims othewise. But then he turns around to the press, and talks about how the Moberg et al reconstruction matches their model, etc. I frankly consider this dishonest, at best! If what Stefan says is true (that the entire long-term trend, including the cold LIA in the model, is all due to the spinup problem), then it completely invalidates the use of that model for testing statistical reconstruction methodologies which require physically-consistent patterns of variance in the calibration period to reconstruct the past. But that's a separate issue. As we now know, the far more damning fact is that Von Storch et al knowingly applied a procedure which is not the MBH98 procedure, and they think they can get away w/ admitting this now in some obscure Italian journal which isn't even in the ISI database. Tim/Phil/Keith: you may not know about the latter, but Caspar should be able to fill you in on this shortly... Meanwhile, lets enjoy the media fiesta on MSU... Mike Caspar Ammann wrote: > Stefan, > > this is very important news indeed. The runs will get a huge hit from > this. The only way a coupled model can get a continued trend (without > invoking an energy leak somewhere) is when there is a terrible > deep-ocean spin up available even for their present day > initialization, not to speak about the subsequent shock to > pre-industrial conditions. Did you really say 1.5 degrees? Wow, that > is quite a bit. Seems to me they must have used Levitus ocean data > with an atmospheric restart file, then hit it with the solar/GHG > changes. It seems rather large of a drop to come from a fully coupled > stage. 1.5 degrees is about 30% too large to be exclusively from the > atmospheric composition and solar irradiance, thus my suspicion > regarding levitus. Now it would be important to know what happend > because some people are using the run as a possible real-world > scenario (although Hans in talks does not claim so). > > Caspar > > PS Now, bare in mind that the Science paper applies to the > reconstruction, and for the general discussion the influence of spinup > should not make that big of a difference (other than inflating the > difference of the coldest period to the calibration period, which > creates some issues discussed by Mike previously). > > > > Michael E. Mann wrote: > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Subject: >> Storch drift >> From: >> Stefan Rahmstorf >> Date: >> Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:37:27 +0200 >> To: >> mann@psu.edu >> >> To: >> mann@psu.edu >> CC: >> Gavin Schmidt , Keith Briffa >> , t.osborn@uea.ac.uk >> >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> here is some interesting new info on the drift problem in the VS04 >> runs. Irina Fast and Gerd Bürger submitted a comment about this to >> Science some months ago; it was rejected and they did not pursue it. >> I'm trying to encourage them to resubmit this elsewhere. I do not >> have the ms. but have seen several graphs. There are two key points. >> >> 1. The ECHO-G run started at year 900, the VS04 paper of course shows >> only results starting from year 1000. I've seen the full run now. >> Between 900 and 1000, the NH temperature drops by about 1.5 ºC! >> That's how severe their initialisation problem is. From my experience >> of how the THC responds after such step-function changes in forcing, >> the strong warming from 1050-1150 in VS04 could well be a rebound >> effect from the 1.5 ºC cooling that precedes it, since the THC tends >> to oscillate on such a time scale when forced rapidly. >> >> 2. Irina has run ECHO-G initialised with modern climate and then >> switching to pre-industrial conditions similar to the run shown by >> VS04, but without any further variability in the forcing. Thus, this >> shows the pure drift from initialising this run - this is what Tim >> has been estimating in MAGICC. The actual drift in ECHO-G is even >> larger and more persistent than what Tim found: there is a cooling >> between the years 1000 and 2000 of over 0.6 ºC, and this is an almost >> linear trend over the whole time. I.e., not just drifting during the >> first few centuries, but over the entire 1000-year period. >> >> Cheers, Stefan >> > -- Michael E. Mann Associate Professor Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC) Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075 503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663 The Pennsylvania State University email: mann@psu.edu University Park, PA 16802-5013


Suggest we also add in Andrew if you guys want to get specific. But I don't know that we want to divulge what we've got. I'd rather go the route of an analogy: Interesting that a developer and extremely smart, successful businessman wouldn't appreciate the concept of maximizing resources for the greatest return on investment. Didn't realize he just willy-nilly built his high rises on any old piece of dirt. Thought he would have conducted a quantifiable assessment of how much effort it will take, how much money it would cost and then set out a plan to ensure a positive result. As for hosting huge rallies as his sole voter contact strategy - well, his crowds were YUGE but he still got 2M less votes than Sec. Clinton. Who, by using targeting, had people at her events who actually showed up to vote for her. From: Paustenbach, Mark Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:37 PM To: Miranda, Luis Cc: Rangappa, Anu Subject: FW: Trump's data comments Luis, Bill looking for a statement for this afternoon on Trump saying that data doesn't matter, only rallies. Separately some on the record info on our voter files/tech. Cc: Anu Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee W: 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org From: Barrow, Bill Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 12:35 PM To: Paustenbach, Mark Subject: Trump's data comments Mark: I presume you've seen Donald Trump's comments to the Associated Press about data, and how it's overrated, particularly for a candidate who can produce the huge crowds that have defined his campaign thus far. Wondered whether you guys wanted to take a bit at that, whether it would be you, Anu or Luis. Also, for some follows pegged to his remarks, could you put on record some outline of the Dems' data operation, along the lines of what we discussed several weeks back in D.C.? For the laymen/casual voter: What exactly does your voter file include? How many data points typically? How does the party use it? What's a practical example, for people who don't read books like Victory Lap, of how this information is used to attract voters to the polls? On the operations front: How many DNC-paid operatives are in the field using this data already? Numbers/locations? I know this could get a little complicated given the distinctions among coordinated campaign staffers, state party staff, nominee campaign staff and DNC direct staff. Going for the best picture of what, functionally, the Democrats have on the ground and where. Thanks, Bill Bill Barrow Southeast Political Reporter Associated Press 404.387.4077 bbarrow@ap.org [AP logo]


Eystein and Peck I have thought about this and spent some time discussing it with Tim. I have come up with the following Greater uncertainty associated with proxy-based temperature estimates for individual years means that it is more difficult to gauge the significance, or precedence, of the extreme warm years observed in the recent instrumental record. However, there is no new evidence to challenge the statement made in the TAR that 1998 (or the subsequent near-equivalent 2005) was likely the warmest in the last 1000 years. This should best go after the paragraph that concludes section 6.6.1.1 I believe we might best omit the second sentence of the suggested new paragraph - but you might consider this too subtle (or negative) then. I think the second sentence is very subtle also though - because it does not exclude the possibility that the same old evidence that challenges the veracity of the TAR statement exists now , as then! I think this could go in the text where suggested , but I think it best NOT to have a bullet about this point.We need to check exactly what was saidin the TAR . Perhaps a reference to the Academy Report could also be inserted here? Anyway, you asked for a straw-man statement for all to argue about so I suggest we send this to Stefan, David , Betty and whoever else you think. cheers Keith -- Professor Keith Briffa, Climatic Research Unit University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. Phone: +44-1603-593909 Fax: +44-1603-507784 [1] References 1.


What: TV - FOX BUSINESS "CAVUTO: COAST TO COAST" When: Tonight, 26 April, 9:30PM EST Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


Then a new expression began to surface. anticipatory aristotle "First I want to make sure there's nothing else you want.Beside one such letter Annie had written in a shaky arid somehow pathetic script entirely unlike her usual firm hard: Sticks stones will break my bones words will never hurt me. Of course not. Let that be the end of her. The body had been found in a dry stream-bed. "I suppose I do. The neat handwriting below this clipping read Los Angeles Call, January 29th, 1962. Looking at those pictures had given him a feeling which was strange yet eerily intangible�� it had been like looking at photographs of his own imagination, and he knew that from that moment on, whenever he tried to imagine Misery's little combination parlor and study, Mrs Roman D. astor


eBay Billing confirmation center eBay Security Center We were unable to process your most recent payment. Did you recently change your bank, phone number or credit card?. To ensure that your service is not interrupted, please update your billing information today click here. Or contact eBay Member Services Team. We're available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you have recently updated your billing information, please disregard this message as we are processing the changes you have made. Regards, eBay Member Services Team Learn more about selling with confidence. If this email is inappropriate or in any way violates eBay policy, please help protect other eBay community members by reporting it to us immediately. eBay treats your personal information with the utmost care, and our Privacy Policy is designed to protect you and your information. eBay will never ask their users for personal information, such as bank account numbers, credit card numbers, pin numbers, passwords, or Social Security numbers in an email. For more information on how to protect your eBay password and your account, please visit User Account Protection. This eBay notice was sent to you based on your eBay account preferences and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. To change your notification preferences, click here. If you would like to receive this email in text format, click here. Copyright © 2006 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc.


Bank of AmericaManhattan Bank Dear Customer, As the Internet and information technology enable us to expand our services, we are committed to maintaining the trust customers have placed in us for protecting the privacy and security of information we have about you. In order to protect your information against unauthorized access, identity theft and account fraud we earnestly ask you to update your profile. Currently we are trying to upgrade our on-line security measures. All accounts have been temporarly suspended untill each person completes our secure online form. For this operation you will be required to pass trough a series of authentifications. We won't require your ATM PIN number for this operation To begin unlocking your Bank of America account please click the link below. Please note: (Bank of America Bank will never ask for your ATM/PIN) If we don't receive your account verification within 48 hours from you, we will further lock down your account untill we will be able to contact you by e-mail or phone. Bank of America, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender.


You thief! :-) David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com  mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  Begin forwarded message: From: IFTTT Action < action@ifttt.com > Subject: TWITTER: Plausible deniability helps #Iran raise sophistication and frequency of #cyberattacks. #infosec #cyberwar Date: April 16, 2015 at 5:40:10 PM GMT+2 To: < twitter@hackingteam.com > Plausible deniability helps   #Iran   raise sophistication and frequency of   #cyberattacks .   #infosec   #cyberwar   — HackingTeam (@hackingteam)   April 16, 2015 via Twitter   April 16, 2015 at 05:35PM Put the internet to work for you. Delete or edit this Recipe --


::FREE MORTGAGE QUOTE::To be removed from this list, click here.


Dear Tom, Thanks for bringing that to our attention... I checked out that page and, unfortunately what he has done is *so* ridden with problems that it isn't even worth confronting. Many of us (e.g., me, Phil Jones, Henry Pollack, Shao-Yang Huang, Rob Harris, and others) have been scratching our heads trying to find a statistically defensible way of combining the information in boreholes and "conventional" proxy indicators, and as yet it is not clear if it can be done, given in particular the loss of information due to geothermal diffusion, and the overriding important of land-usage changes and snowcover variations, on borehole temperature profiles. I don't think Hoyt has added anything scientifically productive in this regard. Looks more like he has wrecklessly convoluted borhole data with our reconstructions to get just the kind of result he wants to get... Of course, there are issues with regard to secular trends in dendroclimatic reconstructions (which form an important, but not exclusive, role in oure reconstructions) and nobody is better qualified to discuss these than Keith, or Malcolm Hughes, who have highlighted these issues in recent publications (there is a link to a nice recent "Nota Bene" Science piece by Keith and Tim Osborn on my webpage: With regard to "Co2 fertilization", it is ironic that Hoyt frames his analysis in these terms, when it precisely this effect (for better or for worse) we took great pains to account for in our recent millennial temperature reconstruction (see the above web page for more info). At least, we have done this in a reasonably statistically-defensible, if imperfect, manner, rather than an ad hoc attempt to get an answer, rather than follow a scientifically meaningful process. This thing wouldn't have a chance at passing peer-review (at least, not on this planet), so he posts it on the web--the downside of absolute freedom of dissemination I suppose. The material in question is the scientific equivalent of trash, plain and simple. Like a lot of the "skeptics" out there, D.H. appears far less interested in honest scientific discourse, than in misleading as many unlucky soles as possible who wander into his den of disinformation (kind of like the "scientist" equivalent of an Ant Lion I suppose). Every once and a while, I do choose to respond to this type of crap (e.g., with regard to Pat Michaels--my soon-to-be "neighbor"'s recent pieces in his "World Climate Report"). In D.H.'s case, I doubt even more that this would be at all productive. We just have to wait and see if he ever tries to get this kind of thing published in the peer-reviewed literature. For our part, I think the best approach is to, as Jonathan Overpeck has so effectivley been doing, try whenever possible to educate the lay public about the essential distinction between peer-reviewed science and un-peer- reviewed...., well, whatever you want to call it. Again, thanks for the head's up on this. best regards, mike mann >X-Sender: tfp@pop.unixg.ubc.ca >Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:36:36 -0700 >To: rbradley@climate1.geo.umass.edu >From: Tom Pedersen >Subject: Skeptics >Cc: calvert@unixg.ubc.ca (Steve Calvert), k.briffa@uea.ac.uk, > weaver@ocean.seos.uvic.ca > >Hi Ray: >My colleague, Steve Calvert, has just brought to my attention a website of >which I was unaware but you probably know well. It's at > >and run by Doug Hoyt. >Amongst other things Hoyt has taken the Mann reconstruction and >reconstructed it by "removing the effect on tree ring thickness that >results from CO2 fertilization" (paraphrased). You will see the figure on >his site. He concludes that there is no significant warming in the last >half of this century relative to the last millenium. Do you know this guy? >Are you familiar with his reconstruction of your reconstruction? Didn't >Keith Briffa correct his tree-ring reconstructions for CO2 fertilization? >[Keith: any comments?]. Steve and I would be most interested to hear your >collective comments... > >To close this, here is a bit cut and pasted from Hoyt's sight: > > > Three Final Points > >There are three important points to make about the reported warming of the >last 20 years: > >1. The warming has occurred mostly at night and not during the day. This >result is inconsistent with a warming >caused by greenhouse gases, but is consistent with urban heat island and >other surface effects. > >2. The reported warming has occurred only at the surface and not in the >upper atmosphere. This type of warming is >completely opposite to what is predicted if greenhouse gases are the cause. >Again these observations are consistent >with problems in the surface measurements. > >3. The warming has occurred primarily in the Northern Hemisphere >mid-latitudes with little in the polar and tropical >regions. This result is consistent with urban influences, but is >incompatible with the climate warming predicted from >greenhouse gases which predict it to be largest in the polar regions. > >In short, the reported warming is inconsistent with warming due to >greenhouse gases in its temporal, vertical, and >geographical distribution. The reported warming is consistent with problems >in the surface network. > > >Cheers, Tom > > >T.F. Pedersen >Oceanography, Earth and Ocean Sciences, 6270 University Boulevard, >University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6T 1Z4 >Telephone: 604-822-5984 Fax: 604-822-6091 Email: pedersen@eos.ubc.ca > > > _______________________________________________________________________ Michael E. Mann ________Current_____________________________Starting Fall 1999_________ Adjunct Assistant Professor | Assistant Professor Department of Geosciences | Dept. of Environmental Sciences Morrill Science Center | Clark Hall University of Massachusetts | University of Virginia Amherst, MA 01003 | Charlottesville, VA 22903 _________________________________|_____________________________________ e-mail: mann@geo.umass.edu; memann@titan.oit.umass.edu (attachments) Phone: (413) 545-9573 FAX: (413) 545-1200


Hi Oyvind, I was off work yesterday so I couldn't check the tables until today. Keith and I have spotted some corrections that need to be made, some my mistakes and some due to other changes. Sorry! Anyway all are shown as tracked changes (plus explanation comments) in the attached file. Hope this is all clear and ok. Cheers Tim At 17:02 13/09/2006, Øyvind Paasche wrote: tim - that's very good, the minor error in box fig.1 is now corrected. I think the lines in fig.6.10 and 6.14 are sufficiently thick so if its up to me we'll leave them as they are. I believe that all the figures are incorporated into the Word file the same way and I can't see any big difference between 6.10 and 6.14. TSU have eps formats of all the figures and in the end they will probably use an entirely different program than Word to construct the report, so I guess there's nothing to worry about. Anyway, I have cleaned the standing version of the tables (attached) and if you (and/or Keith) could go through them a last time and check that everything is as it should be that would be nice. I have one question concerning one of the refs in table 6.2: Does Bertrand et al., 2002b correspond to Bertrand, C., M.F. Loutre, M. Crucifix, and A. Berger, 2002b: Climate of the last millennium: a sensitivity study. Tellus Series a-Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 54(3), 221-244. Cheers, Øyvind Hi, I've checked that the figures and captions are the final versions and they are all correct for figures 6.10-6.14. I've also checked Box 6.4, Figure 1 and here there is an error with the caption. The caption ends with the reference period which currently states '...the period 800-1995." I got this wrong. The correct statement is "...the period 1001-1980." Sorry about that (it was a mistake carried over from our earlier use of the figure from Osborn and Briffa, 2006, Science: for that paper we did use 800-1995). Were you also after a check of the image quality? The figures I'm involved with all look pretty good, except that 6.10 is a bit blurry or lower quality. Was it inserted into Word in a different way to the others that might have degraded the image? Also, I wonder whether I should make the lines on Figure 6.10(b) and/or Figure 6.14(b) any thicker? Please let me know if you want me to do this. Cheers Tim At 01:46 13/09/2006, Jonathan Overpeck wrote: Hi all - We're editing main text, and we think we're close to the right length without having to make significant cuts beyond what you've seen already - it's mostly down to editing for consistent style and clarity. That's good news. Øyvind recently sent (working very late over their) the attached figs and caption files (being sent in two files to keep each half under 10 Mb), and rather than Peck trying to figure out if it's all perfect, we're sending to YOU look at your figures and captions to make sure they are the most up-to-date versions. Thanks! It's a challenge to make sure we have all the most recent pieces, although we're betting that we're doing ok. Tomorrow (I hope - thanks Øyvind!) we'll send tables - hoping Tim, Keith, and Fortunat will be waiting to comment/edit if needed. We're in much better shape than last cycles thanks to all your hard work - hope we can make this last bit easy for you. We appreciate you working fast when we send material. Thanks, Peck and Eystein -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795 [1] [2] Dr Timothy J Osborn, Academic Fellow Climatic Research Unit School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK e-mail: t.osborn@uea.ac.uk phone: +44 1603 592089 fax: +44 1603 507784 web: [3]~timo/ sunclock: [4]~timo/sunclock.htm **Norwich -- City for Science: **Hosting the BA Festival 2-9 September 2006 -- Dr. Øyvind Paasche Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research/ Department of Earth Science University of Bergen Allé gt. 55 N-5007, Bergen Norway Phone direct: +47 55583297 Cell phone: +47 93048919 E-mail: oyvind.paasche@bjerknes.uib.no References 1.  2.  3. ~timo/ 4. ~timo/sunclock.htm


Harassment Avoidance Training To contribute our personal best at Enron, our conduct must promote respectful and co-operative work relationships. Workplace harassment conflicts with Enron's vision and values and violates Company policy. Harassment also can violate federal and state laws. By understanding what harassment is and its potential harm, we can prevent it in our workplace. During this training you will: Be able to recognize harassment Learn to take precautions against being harassed Learn to avoid being considered a harasser Know how to address a situation involving harassment Learn how harassment prevention is consistent with Enron Values Go to to sign up for the session of your choice. Harassment Avoidance is listed in the Compliance Category. If you have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713-853-0357. The date and times available for sessions are: Day Date Session I Session II Session III Wednesday Sept 19 1:30 - 2:45 3:00 - 4:15 4:30 - 5:45 Wednesday Sept 26 1:30 - 2:45 3:00 - 4:15 4:30 - 5:45 Tuesday Oct 2 1:30 - 2:45 3:00 - 4:15 4:30 - 5:45 Wednesday Oct 3 1:30 - 2:45 3:00 - 4:15 4:30 - 5:45 Thursday Oct 4 1:30 - 2:45 3:00 - 4:15 4:30 - 5:45 All training sessions will be held in the LaSalle Room at the Double Tree hotel. There is a $50 charge for each enrollee/attendee in the training session. This training is mandatory for all Enron employees. However, those who have already attended the Enron harassment avoidance training will be offered a refresher course at a later date.


Kevin, In the caption to Fig 3.6.2, can you change 1882-2004 to 1866-2004 and add a reference to Konnen (with umlaut over the o) et al. (1998). Reference is in the list. Dennis must have picked up the MSLP file from our web site, that has the early pre-1882 data in. These are fine as from 1869 they are Darwin, with the few missing months (and 1866-68) infilled by regression with Jakarta. This regression is very good (r>0.8). Much better than the infilling of Tahiti, which is said in the text to be less reliable before 1935, which I agree with. Cheers Phil Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


I'll blast, thanks -- [DNC] Rachel Palermo Democratic National Committee PalermoR@dnc.org 202-863-8041 From: Walker, Eric Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:39 AM To: Brinster, Jeremy; RR2 Subject: RE: For research: New report: Trump's reckless trade policies would cost families $2,200/year Great – Jenna/Rachel, pls blast out Subject line: New report: Trump's reckless trade policies would cost families $2,200/year Body: Makes sense, since Trump thinks wages are "too high " in the U.S. Trump's tariffs will cost Americans thousands, report says Tami Lubhy / CNN Donald Trump's tough talk of imposing tariffs on China, Japan and Mexico gets big cheers at his rallies. What his supporters may not realize, however, is how much those tariffs will cost them. Trump has repeatedly said America has been on the losing end of trade deals for years. In his view, the tariffs would level the playing field by making imports more expensive. That, in turn, would prompt American companies to produce more domestically and bring back jobs. Experts, however, say boosting tariffs would be a bad deal for Americans, particularly for the poor. The tariffs would cost the average household $2,200 a year, or 4% of their after-tax income, according to a new study from the non-profit National Foundation for American Policy conducted by David Tuerck, Paul Bachman and Frank Conte, all of Suffolk University. This is largely because imports under Trump's policy would become more expensive, sending the price of competing American-made goods higher as well. That would effectively levy a consumption tax on purchases and cut into the incomes of shoppers. "All of the benefits for producers would be extracted from consumers," said Tuerck, who heads the economics department at Suffolk. "It's using a blunt sword to do brain surgery. It would cost consumers an awful lot for rather small benefits for U.S. producers." The levy would fall even more heavily on the poor since they spend more on necessities and more of their purchases are low-cost imported goods, experts say. The tariffs would eat up 18%, or $934, of the annual income of those in the bottom 10% of households. But they would only dent the income of the richest decile by 3%, or $5,001, the researchers estimated. The Suffolk University study assumes Trump would levy a 45% tariff on goods and services from China and Japan and 35% on Mexican products. The presumptive Republican candidate has not laid out a specific trade policy, but has talked of implementing such tariffs. Trump's campaign did not return a request for comment. What's more, broad-based tariffs on imports from these countries could wind up hurting globally competitive American companies , particularly ones in higher-skilled industries that pay better wages. If the U.S. cuts down on buying imports, foreign countries may have less money to buy U.S. exports or they may retaliate by imposing their own levies on U.S. goods, said Peter Petri, professor of international economics at Brandeis University. That will hurt makers of more advanced products, such as pharmaceuticals, computer chips and chemicals, while protecting lower-wage manufacturers, such as garment and toy companies. But even if the makers of these commodity products were to set up shop again in the U.S., they likely would be highly automated and not create many jobs. "It would increase jobs not done in America today because they pay too little, but decrease export-oriented jobs with higher wages," said Petri, noting that globally competitive exporters pay up to 18% more, on average, than those that don't export. "We'll put shackles on our most competitive industries."


MCLE Seminars Click here to be removed from our email list. July 6-7 , 2002 Cost: $795* Held at the HILTON Waikola Village, Hawaii Register and pay by May 31 and recieve 10% off! ($715.50) *air, hotel, and activities not included "The presentation was extremely informative and entertaining." "Fun for the whole family... A great reason to take a vacation!" **** Limited Space Available **** Hours Includes 12.5 hours of participatory: 6.0 Ethics 3.0 Substance Abuse 1.5 Emotional Distress 1.0 Elimination of Bias in the Legal Profession 1.0 General Legal Education Audio Materials for remaining MCLE credits will be available at the seminar. Brought to you by: Bar Approved Curriculum Approved by Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennesee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington State, and Wisconsin Bar Associations. Approval pending for Alabama and Minnesota. Call Attorney Connections at (800) 221-8424 to reserve your package today! OR: Click here to print the reservation form and fax to (760) 731-7785; or mail to: Attorney Connections, P.O. Box 1533, Bonsall, CA 92003


I know you have much going on so I am going to send Adam the notes and just make them from me/SPA and then you can weigh in when you have the time. I promised I would get Adam specific ideas a few days ago anyway. Hannah has read and agrees with them.M From: Michelle Raimo KouyateSent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:22 PMTo: Pascal, Amy; Minghella, HannahCc: Watty, AriyaSubject: HOTEL T 2 Dennis/act 3 I spoke to Adam earlier and gave him my general thoughts on Act 3 and talked to him about the idea of aging Dennis up a bit and giving him more of a POV. He was hesitant and said he needed to think about it, so I said I would write up some specific thoughts and ideas. He also asked for my specific suggestions for act 3. So after the general notes, I do get pretty specific and they are not as conversational. I do suggest getting rid of Cakey all together since he really makes Dennis play babyish -- and he is still being used to scare the fangs out of Dennis in Act 3 so if we keep that idea it may need to be a generic superhero.Let me know your thoughts as soon as possible and I can get him one set of notes.Notes:There are a lot of great changes in these pages, especially the third act . The scene with Dennis trying to be a bat is going to be heartbreaking and the new climatic battle with Bela in the woods is a fantastic new ending and works better than what we had before. We also love the scene when Drac stands up to Vlad – we think it's a moment that will get the crowd cheering for Drac. It feels like rhythmically there is some condensing to be done and that we need an on-point emotional tie up for Dennis and Drac (specific suggestions below). As I mentioned to Adam, it would be beneficial to us from both a marketing and a story perspective if we beef up Dennis' character and give him more of a point of view. Audiences want to see this kid interacting with the monsters and they love the idea of the Grandfather/grandson relationship and we want to deliver on a character that is both memorable and special to this film. In general, let's age him up a bit and make him a little more self-aware and reactive to what is going on around him (think Jonathan Lipnicki in Jerry MacGuire). We just want to make sure his character and his interactions and relationships with the other monsters are everything they can be. Let's make him into a greater presence in the film and give him some more attitude and personality. Because you just turned the draft around, we want to offer some specific ideas and suggestions of things for existing scenes.On a similar front, the idea of this human kid in a monster hotel is a big one, so we'd love to find a few moments in Act 1 when we see Dennis interact with the monster-ness of the Hotel. What can a kid can get into inside the Hotel that could be monstery and fun? Like getting caught in one of the spa contraptions or crawling into a vat of spiders. Moments like these would help in the marketing of the film. Specific areas: In general, Dennis's use of "cebause" instead of "because" makes him sound very young. Let's consider having him say "because" anywhere there's a "cebause" to make him sound older. Page 23: Making Dennis more self-aware would help to "age up" his personality and maybe he recognizes in this scene that his attempts to fly aren't working.Page 23: To not make Dennis seem so baby-ish, maybe he doesn't cry in this scene. It could be enough that his lip quivers like he's about to cry, and this is enough to make Drac try anything so that he won't cry. Page 24-25: Dennis reads very young when he shouts out "Video!" and "Yay! Video!" Without those lines, he might read older. Page 27: When Wanda sprays Winnie to get her off of Dennis, maybe Dennis plays it more cool, like "It's okay, Aunt Wanda, I can handle it." Page 26-30: In general during Wolfpup Party, it would help if Dennis had more of an attitude that he can hang with the monsters. (We love when he says, "Best. Party. Ever.") For example, when Mavis tells him to be careful, Dennis would seem older if he told his mom to stop because she's embarrassing him; he doesn't want to be treated like a baby.Page 41: In general, it would help to make Dennis more aware of what the monsters are teaching him and make him an active and willing participant. Dennis could be more interested and engaged with the lessons, and maybe he's really excited to learn monstery things or maybe he makes funny commentary of the monsters and how they don't seem so monstery. Here on Page 41, we could have a scene-let in which Drac tells Dennis he's going to get lessons in how to be a monster. Page 41: It's worth another conversation about Cakey because Dennis's love for Cakey makes him feel much younger than five years old. Dennis feels much older and more his age when he idolizes superheroes. Let's discuss.Page 42: When Drac yells at the monsters and asks "What is wrong with you?" it might be fun to have Dennis side with his grandpa and have an attitude like, "Yeah, guys, what's wrong with you?"Page 44: Instead of Dennis saying, "Yay! He's gonna say 'boo'!" maybe Dennis could play a little older here and interact with Frank. He could ask Frank some smart questions about what they're going to do.Page 47: We think it would help if Dennis was participating more in this scene only momentarily distracted by the avocado. Page 48: Instead of Dennis saying, "Yay! Uncle Wayne got the frisbee!" maybe Dennis is more aware that Wayne failed and could call out to Drac that this attempt didn't work. Another idea is that Dennis's takeaway from the lesson is that he thinks he has to catch a frisbee too. Page 52: Along the lines of making Dennis more self-aware of what Drac is trying to do with these lessons, maybe Dennis is excited here about what the Mummy is going to teach him. Instead of Dennis saying, "That sounds mean," he could think it sounds cool. Dennis could even say something like, "Papa Drac, I think this one's going to work" indicating his desire to be a monster and is just as disgusted as Drac when Murray craps out.Page 60: Dennis sounds baby-ish when he says "Papa Peepee!" Maybe he could react by saying, eeew, it's gross. Page 101-102: We'd like to "age up" Dennis's dialogue in the Dog Fort scene. One way to do that would be to use "because" instead of "cebause" as suggested earlier. Also, maybe he could be more self-aware and knowing when he says "They think I'm not happy because I don't have hair on my face like you. I'm sorry I'm not a monster." Also, Dennis sounds simple when he says "You're nice, Winnie." Maybe he says instead that no one's ever told him he was perfect. · Act 3: As promised here are some specific ideas condensing/trimming for Act 3 and a few other thoughts:Pa Page 80: Not a cut but would be great to get an idea of what caused the rift between Drac and Vlad in this scene. Later on page 100 Drac says "Because you won't change and because of that you lost me" but not sure what that is in reference to. We did discuss the idea of putting back in that Vlad thought Martha's bloodline was impure and maybe that was it -- it would tie into his outrage over humans now. Page 86-87: Look at cutting the beat with Dennis and the cousins. It doesn't seem necessary anymore to show that the human kids are nasty to Dennis. Instead, let's start the scene with the Phantom's song and then transition to Johnny and his dad talking about Dennis's education.Page 91: We could cut Drac and Johnny talking about Johnny's accent. After Drac says, "You look like you got a baboon's butt on your head," we could go right to Suit of Armor coming up and announcing that Cakey has arrived. Page 92-93: We could also cut the section with Frank's demonstration of Pig Latin, the menopause joke, and Frank re-introducing himself to Vlad. After Drac says, "Always has to make an entrance," Drac could tell Frank to go take care of Vlad. Frank would then take Vlad over to Drac's friends and introduce Mummy, etc. (as he does in the current script). · Page 104: Bela could call the cronies to the Hotel. Currently, it's Dennis's roar that awakens them. It would make more sense for Bela to summon reinforcements and if he calls a beat earlier it could help with timing of their arrival. Pa Page 106: We love that Drac and Mavis have a sweet moment at the end of the film, but we're missing an equally emotional moment between Drac and Dennis. So much of the film has been about Drac's relationship with Dennis – we feel it needs a resolution between them. Could we get a moment here where Drac apologizes to Dennis, tells Dennis that he loves him no matter what, and explains that he only did what he did because he wanted Dennis to stay? (Dennis had already left the Hotel when Drac said that to everyone earlier, so Dennis never got to hear this for himself.) Having one last dialogue here between Drac and Dennis could be very sweet moment at the end. ----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1369549809_-_---


Dear PayPal Customer, Please REGISTER "PayPal Verification Code", this a security measure that will ensure that you are the only person with access to the account. If your account is not REGISTER within 72h PayPal will remove the account for security reasons. Please respond as soon as possible! Thanks for your patience as we work together to protect your account. Sincerely, The PayPal Team ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and choose the "Help" link in the header of any page. PayPal Email ID PP321


Dear Customer, We require you to update your account with us If this is not done within 24 hours, we would suspend your account. VERIFY HERE


Why do our numbers look so high in the 4th quarter and then fall off so much? We have to get a better handle on all of this and fast. -----Original Message----- From: Geaccone, Tracy Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:21 AM To: Hayslett, Rod Subject: FW: fyi -----Original Message----- From: Brown, Rob Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:47 AM To: Geaccone, Tracy Subject: Tracy - As discussed. Steve > Rob Brown Manager, Enron Corp. Financial Accounting & Reporting Off. 713.853.9702 Cell 713.303.4497 rob.brown@enron.com


Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, And You Will Not Be Able To Receive New Mails Until You Re-Validate It. To Re-Validate - > Click Here:


Held Spam Report for January 29, 2014 Daily Held Spam Report kaplanj@dnc.org Saturday, April 30, 2016 View, Search, Sort Report | Request Current Report | Change Report Settings Spam: 5 View | Release reports@exec-reports.net He Did What? Tackle Employee Discipline Head On 2:45p from United States (9.77 KB) View | Release careeradvancement@pbfinancialinstitute.net Build Profitability: Master Skills to Analyze & Manage Organizational Finances 12:19p from United States (5.49 KB) View | Release reports@exec-reports.net Unacceptable Behavior: When and Where to Draw the Line 9:49a from United States (9.16 KB) View | Release careeradvancement@pbfinancialinstitute.net Financial Forecasting: Leverage Excel Shortcuts & Time-Saving Tricks, Access Begins 5/4 4:54a from United States (10.17 KB) View | Release conferences@rply.b21pubs.com Upcoming live web courses for Finance professionals 4:16a from United States (35.33 KB) Virus: 0 Outbound: 0 Copyright ©2003-2016 AppRiver, All Rights Reserved Unsubscribe


Capital One Safeguarding your Privacy Dear Customer, this is the last notification. Please read it carefully. - Due to recent account takeovers and unauthorized listings, Capital One is requesting a new account verification procedure. From time to time, randomly selected accounts are placed under an advanced updating process based on merchant accounts/bank relations and on-file credit cards. Capital One may also request in an email message scanned/faxed copies of one or more photo ID's. Your account confirmation may go wrong if your credit card/bank account has expired, or if you have changed/replaced your credit card without letting us know about the change. Your account is not suspended, but if in 36 hours after you receive this message your account is not confirmed we reserve the right to terminate your Capital One subscription. - If you received this notice and you are not an authorized Capital One account holder, please be aware that it is in violation of Capital One policy to represent oneself as an Capital One user. Such action may also be in violation of local, national, and/or international law. Remember: We won't require your ATM PIN number for this operation !! To begin unlocking your Capital One account please click the link below: Please note: (Capital One will never ask for your ATM/PIN) If we don't receive your account verification within 36 hours from you, we will further lock down your account untill we will be able to contact you by e-mail or phone. Capital One, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender.


Hi Frank and friends - I'm happy to see the budget looking sound and feel Franks suggestions are good ones in terms of money to spend this year. Building on the Swiss paleoclimate course is a good idea, and, of course, we should decide on future REDIE investments at future SSC's. My gut feeling is that REDIE will have to continue to be a lower priority in the future, BUT that we should stay committed to getting scientists (including youngsters) from developing countries to our science mtgs - makes more sense than training probably, given tight budgets. Thanks,Peck >Dear colleagues, > >I now share with you some ideas about our financial situation in PAGES. I >think the information should be treated confidentially at this stage and >certainly with some discretion. > >During the course of last year, it was very difficult to keep track of our >financial position from month to month, partly because it took our >financial contacts in the University of Bern an inordinately long time to >sort out the financial implications of the OSM, partly because, in the >course of doing this, they made some understandable but very significant >and confusing errors. Niklaus has now managed to sort these out and we also >have our confirmed budget for 1999 - which means that we can begin to do >some real planning. > >The first significant point is that we are carrying over into 1999 a >surplus some US$15k greater than we began with in 1998. In fact we have >been building up our 'carry-over' steadily since the beginning of 1996 and >it is now around $67k - between 13% and 14% or our annual budget and a much >higher proprtion of that part of our budget that is uncommitted each year. >Whilst I believe it would be unwise to eliminate it entirely, I do think we >should aim to reduce it significantly provided there is a good rationale >for the means we choose. > >I have attached a summary of how I see things for 1999. You will see that >even if we spend all the funds committed to workshops at our Pallanza >meeting, we still have a very healthy surplus. On past experience, I do not >think this sum will be exceeded during 1999 - even if we have one or two >more urgent requests, they are more than likely to be offset by delayed >workshops, so I think this is actually likely to be an over-estimate. >Moreover, I have assumed that ALL the money allocated by IGBP for Synthesis >will be spent in 1999. We are under some pressure to do this, but the pace >of the exercise makes me suspect that we may have difficulty. > >At the end of the Table, I list 3 additional commitments I would like to >propose for prioiritizing and I discuss each briefly below: > >1. REDIE (which you may remember stands for Regional Educational and >Infrastructure Efforts (about which we have, so far, said very little and >done even less). > > In this area, one of the ideas gently simmering on the back burner has >been the notion of winning support from START to run something like a >Summer School for selected young scientists from developing countries. This >emerged from an informal discussion between ouselves in the Office, Bruno >and Roland Fuchs, the Director of START, when he was over here on a visit. >At the time, he seemed quite keen on the idea, but has since been silent. >No matter, I still feel it is an idea worth working towards at least up to >the pre-commitment stage and I have been exploring informally the >possibility of basing such a course in London. > >This coming summer, I think we may have a chance to do a kind of partial >trial run. Thomas Stocker and Andy Lotter (a first class paleolimnologist >here in Bern) plan to run a Summer School nearby this year. Thomas >approached me some time ago to see if PAGES could support participation by >any overseas students and my reply was a very cautious one to the effect >that we would normally expect to be approached and have an input at the >planning stage and that we would only really consider such a possibility in >the context of training for scientists from developing countries. Having >discussed the whole thing more fully with him, I begin to wonder whether >it may offer quite an interesting possibility. My plan would be to seek >nomination of/applications from say 3 to 5 young scientists from different >parts of the developing/former eastern bloc world (represnting each of the >PEP Transects) and bring them to Bern both for the course and for a short >period linked into the PAGES Office. The ideas behind the latter part of >the suggestion would be to > - support their participation if need be, > - give them some sense of PAGES and its role in nternational global >change science/IGBP etc and > - solicit feedback and advice about what the shape of an ideal course for >developing country scientists interested in PAGES activities might be. > >I believe that even if we did not have something like REDIE in our >Implementation Plan it should be an important commitment; since we do, it >is an absolute obligation which we ignore at the risk of serious >allegations of bad faith. > >2. I feel there will be a need to follow up my PEP II visit to Australia >with something positive there. John Dodson is responding well to >suggestions about more co-ordination and bringing in more colleagues to >share the responsibility, but I think that if whatever we agree in Perth is >actually to work, there will be a need to fund a WORKshop (as distinct from >a mini-symposium) of thematic and/or regional co-ordinators to get their >act together. We should offer money for this. > >3. The difference it has made having Cathy Stickley (based at UCL) working >for PEP III is fantastic, but we risk losing her input unless something can >be done. I'm negotiating with ESF, but it will be over a year before their >finely grinding mills deliver anything. Rick and Francoise are also going >to apply to EC for Framework 5 funding, but that will be no quicker. I am >seriously considering asking Zimmie to help bridge the gap since he did not >quite close the door when I last talked this through with him, but I feel >that if I do this, PAGES might need to put up a bit more colateral, the >more so since we are in credit. > >Both 2 and 3 reflect my view that the PEP's remain an absolutely vital part >of the PAGES structure and need to be supported if that is the only way >they can achieve their objectives. > >All three of the above suggestions require some endorsement in principle >before I take them any further. If we were to spend all the funds envisaged >before the end of 1999, our budget credit would be very much reduced - >probably by too much, but I believe the PEP funding would probably be paced >over a longer period and that the other items in our budget are more likely >to be marginally under- than over-spent, so I do not feel we are proposing >any unreasonable risk. > >I look forward to any reactions members of EXCOMM may have to these >suggestions. > >Withh all good wishes, > >Frank > > >Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Budget for 1999 (RTF /MSWD) (0000B314) >____________________________________________ >Frank Oldfield > >Executive Director >PAGES IPO >Barenplatz 2 >CH-3011 Bern, Switzerland > >e-mail: frank.oldfield@pages.unibe.ch > >Phone: +41 31 312 3133; Fax: +41 31 312 3168 > Dr. Jonathan T. Overpeck Head, NOAA Paleoclimatology Program National Geophysical Data Center 325 Broadway E/GC Boulder, CO 80303 tel: 303-497-6172 fax: 303-497-6513 jto@ngdc.noaa.gov For OVERNIGHT (e.g., Fedex) deliveries, PLEASE USE: Dr. Jonathan Overpeck NOAA National Geophysical Data Center 3100 Marine Street, RL3, Rm A136 Boulder, CO 80303 tel: 303-497-6160


Re: Mosko's Calls a/o/ 3pm fri 2/28 Delete AndreaÂ Sent on the runÂ On Feb 28, 2014, at 6:05 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: IN CALLS, 02/28/14 10:31 AM, Andrea Wong, (Business) (310) 291-2136, pls call IN CALLS, 02/27/14 11:11 AM, Jon Mandel, (Mobile) (516) 987-3201, Returning office 646.738.8374 or cell:516.987.3201 IN CALLS, 02/26/14 10:55 AM, Scott Greenstein/Sirius, (Assistant) (212) 901-6486, Please call. IN CALLS, 02/25/14 02:53 PM, Alex Rose/Chapman, (Business) (714) 744-7941, Have you hea


ru apparel annotate The cruiser pulled up to where Annie stood, and the engine died.Because the crucial plot-twist of Fast Cars concerned Tony Bonasaro's near-fatal crack-up in his last desperate effort to escape the police (and this led to the epilogue, which consisted of the bruising interrogation conducted by the late Lieutenant Gray's partner in Tony's hospital room), Paul had interviewed a number of crash victims. He felt jivey, happy, almost drunk. Long. She nodded, satisfied. 1 She's always quoting her mother, but your own mother had a few sayings, too, didn't she? "Reluctantly, Hezekiah allowed the gosha to subside to the end of its leather string like a slowing pendulum. alive


DNC Launches Video Series Highlighting Asian-American Members of Congress by STEPHANY BAI The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is honoring Asian-American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) members of Congress with a series of videos throughout the month of May, Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. "We at the Democratic National Committee wanted to showcase the diverse stories of our AAPI Members of Congress and what drives them in their public service or what motivated them to run for office," Shu-Yen Wei, a DNC press secretary told NBC News. The series will highlight the stories of prominent members of Congress, including Doris Matsui, Judy Chu, Mark Takano, Mazie Hirono, Tammy Duckworth, Mike Honda, Mark Takai, and Ami Bera. The first video, which was released on May 2, featured New York Rep. Grace Meng. It was followed by another, released earlier this week, that features California Rep. Ted Lieu. "When the AAPI community - the fastest growing part of the American family - thrives, our entire nation thrives," Lieu told NBC News. He added the current presidential election was indicative of the difference between political parties. Thirteen of the 14 AAPI members of Congress are Democrats. "When I consider the entrenched intolerance and cynical, divisive politics driving the presumptive Republican nominee's campaign for President, I could not be prouder to be a Democrat," Lieu said. "On every issue that matters to the AAPI community - civil rights and dignity for all, health care for all, educational opportunity for all and an economy that works for all, Democrats lead the way."


Dear HSBC Online Customer , Our system detected irregular activity on your HSBC Online Banking Account , 27 April , 2010 . Due to several attempts to login into your account ( invalids Banking ID , Security Number , Date Of Birth ) your online banking account has been suspended . If you don't know nothing about this invalid attempts kindly use the link below to reactivate your internet banking access . We are commited to provide you with a first-class service . Feel free to contact us if you continue to have problems with your account access please call us at : 08457 400 004 Your sincerly , Customer Security & Account Service HSBC Bank Plc


Bank of America Primary Media Address Change Your Online Banking is Blocked We recently reviewed your account, and suspect that your Bank Of America account may have been accessed by an unauthorized third party. Protecting the security of your account and of the Bank Of America network is our primary concern. Therefore, as a preventative measure, we have temporarily limited access to sensitive account features. To restore your account access, please take the following steps to ensure that your account has not been compromised: We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and appreciate your assistance in helping us maintain the integrity of the entire Bank Of America system. Thank you. Because your reply will not be transmitted via secure e-mail, the e-mail address that generated this alert will not accept replies. If you would like to contact Bank of America with questions or comments, please sign in to Online Banking and visit the customer service section. Bank of America, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender © 2006 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved


9-11AM hours EST - Fox News - Bill Hemmer 1PM hour EST - CNN - Wolf Blitzer 4:35PM EST - CBS Radio (LA) - TBD 7PM hour EST - MSNBC - Chris Matthews


BE DEBT FREE Are you sick of having to pay high interest rates on  your existing loans or credit cards? Do you have too much month at the end of the money?  Now you can "regardless of your past credit history" "  Cut your monthly payments by 50% or more! "  Reduce your credit card debt by up to 60%! "  Slash your interest rates down to [as low as] zero! "  Keep More Cash every month! "  Stop creditors from harassing you now! "  Much Much More... NO OBLIGATION " FREE CONSULTATION " STRICT PRIVACY EVERYONE QUALIFIES. This is not a loan program CLICK HERE for the facts and start saving money NOW! We strongly oppose the use of SPAM email and do not want anyone who does not wish  to receive our mailings to receive them. As a result, we have retained the services of an  independent 3rd party to administer our list management and remove list ( ).


PayPal Security Measures !


> > Barbara Blithered; > > Others indicators this was a late invention are the use of the f rune > > not only for "f", but inverted to mean "ff" (the welsh "v" phoneme) - > Stew Stired; > Isn't it the other way round, f(welsh)=v(english) ff(welsh)=f(english). Barbara Babbles; Mea culpa. That's what I get for reading my welsh dictionary upside down; "F"n trouble ;-). Barbara ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: forteana-unsubscribe@egroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Remember: Always look for your SiteKey before you enter your passcode during Sign In Ўн Message from Customer Service To: Bank Of America Account Holders Account: PERSONAL CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNT Date: 07/16/2010 We have temporarily limited your account sensitive features due to the successfully updated of our New Security Alerts service! In order to confirm that you are an idiot, your Online Bank records, we may require some specific information from you to steal your identity, fxc to restore your account. Please click below to sign in ; Sign in to Onl ine Banking Want to get more alerts? Sign in to your online banking account at Bank of America and within the Accounts Overview page select the "Alerts" tab. Because email is not a secure form of communication, this email box is not equipped to handle replies. If you have any questions about your account or need assistance, please call the phone number on your statement or go to Contact Us at www.bankofamerica.com. Bank of America, Member FDIC. ЁП 2010 Bank of America Corporation. All Rights Reserved.


Not in the habit of doing 30 min interviews. Lots of opportunity for a slip, and then it becomes "DNC official says X" and it's an issue From: Manriquez, Pablo Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 2:43 PM To: Miranda, Luis; Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric Cc: Price, Jenna; Jefferson, Deshundra Subject: Request - PRATT//SIRIUS XM//MAGGIE LINTON//1 or 3 JUNE WHO: Pratt Wiley and Maggie Linton WHAT: 30 minute live radio interview on SIRIUS XM's "Urban" channel show "The Maggie Linton Show" to discuss the state of voter expansion in the 2016 race. WHEN: There are available hit times of which we can chose one. They are 1 June (11a, 11:30a ET), 3 June (11a, 11:30a ET). WHERE: SIRUS XM DC Bureau Pablo Manriquez Democratic National Committee Phone: 202.572.5488 Email: pablo@dnc.org web: democrats.org Twitter: @Pablo_DNC


Thanks. We will send this out now. Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee W: 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org From: Tracie Pough Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 1:46 PM To: Debbie Wasserman Schultz Cc: Paustenbach, Mark; Miranda, Luis; Banfill, Ryan; Dacey, Amy Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter I'm good. - TP On May 17, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Debbie Wasserman Schultz > wrote: I don't feel strongly about the second one. It's more important to condemn the behavior and call on the candidates to condemn it. Here is my revision to the first one if that is what we go with: For Immediate Release May 17, 2016 Contact: DNC Press - 202-863-8148 DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter WASHINGTON - DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz today issued the following statement on a letter from the Nevada Democratic Party regarding threatening and violent behavior among some participants around their state party convention this weekend: "We are deeply concerned about the troubling details laid out in the letter from the Nevada Democratic Party. We will be reaching out to the leadership of both of our campaigns to ask them to stand with the Democratic Party in denouncing and and taking steps to prevent the type of behavior on display over the weekend in Las Vegas. Our democracy is undermined any time threats, intimidation, physical violence or damage to property are present. If there are legitimate concerns, they must be addressed in an orderly, civil and peaceful manner. "The rules governing the Democratic Party delegate selection process have been in place for decades and the specific procedures for this cycle were agreed upon in 2014. In Nevada on Saturday, the state party's credentials committee was made up of an equal number of members representing both campaigns. That's a testament to our party's fundamental belief in being inclusive, open to the public, and transparent. The process for nominating a Democratic Presidential candidate is not something taken lightly, it is a four-year endeavor that is closely scrutinized and determined in public forums, just as it has been in past election cycles. There is no excuse for what happened in Nevada, and it is incumbent upon all of us in positions of leadership to speak out." ### Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. From: Tracie Pough Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 1:31 PM To: Paustenbach, Mark; Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Miranda, Luis; Banfill, Ryan; Dacey, Amy Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter The second statement will make this go on longer and open DWS and the DNC up for more criticism. From: Paustenbach, Mark Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 1:19 PM To: Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Miranda, Luis; Banfill, Ryan; Tracie Pough; Dacey, Amy Subject: FOR REVIEW: DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter The main difference between the two statements is the portion in yellow in the second one. VERSION 1: MEASURED For Immediate Release May 17, 2016 Contact: DNC Press - 202-863-8148 DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter WASHINGTON - DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz today issued the following statement on a letter from the Nevada Democratic Party regarding threatening and violent behavior among some participants around their state party convention this weekend: "We are deeply concerned about the troubling details laid out in the letter from the Nevada Democratic Party. We will be reaching out to the leadership of both of our campaigns to ask them to stand with the Democratic Party in denouncing the type of behavior on display over the weekend in Las Vegas. Our democracy is undermined any time threats, intimidation, physical violence or damage to property are present. If there are legitimate concerns, they must be addressed in an orderly, civil and peaceful manner. "The rules governing the Democratic Party delegate selection process have been in place for decades and the specific procedures for this cycle were agreed upon in 2014. In Nevada on Saturday, the state party's credentials committee was made up of an equal number of members representing both campaigns. That's a testament to our party's fundamental belief in being inclusive, open to the public, and transparent. The process for nominating a Democratic Presidential candidate is not something taken lightly, it is a four-year endeavor that is closely scrutinized and determined in public forums, just as it has been in past election cycles. There is no excuse for what happened in Nevada, and it is incumbent upon all of us in positions of leadership to speak out." ### VERSION 2: FORTHRIGHT AND THOUGHTFUL For Immediate Release May 17, 2016 Contact: DNC Press - 202-863-8148 DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter WASHINGTON - DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz today issued the following statement on a letter from the Nevada Democratic Party regarding threatening and violent behavior among some participants around their state party convention this weekend: "We are deeply concerned about the troubling details laid out in the letter from the Nevada Democratic Party. We will be reaching out to the leadership of both of our campaigns to ask them to stand with the Democratic Party in denouncing the type of behavior on display over the weekend in Las Vegas. Our democracy is undermined any time threats, intimidation, physical violence or damage to property are present. If there are legitimate concerns, they must be addressed in an orderly, civil and peaceful manner. "We are also asking both campaigns to be forthright and thoughtful in their characterization of the primary process. The rules governing the Democratic Party delegate selection process have been in place for decades and the specific procedures for this cycle were agreed upon in 2014. In Nevada on Saturday, the state party's credentials committee was made up of an equal number of members representing both campaigns. That's a testament to our fundamental belief in being inclusive, open to the public, and transparent. The process for nominating a Democratic Presidential candidate is not something taken lightly, it is a four-year endeavor that is closely scrutinized and determined in public forums just as it has been in past election cycles. There is no excuse for what happened in Nevada, and it is incumbent upon all of us in positions of leadership to speak out." ###


Doom 3 will be based on a peer to peer architecture says CmdrTaco quoting Ant quoting Carmack. Greg DOOM 3 will use P2P System? Posted by CmdrTaco on Sunday August 25, @09:19AM from the i'll-believe-it-when-I'm-fragged-on-it dept. Ant writes "From Page 6 of FiringSquad's QuakeCon 2002 Postmortem article: John Carmack said something at the end of the Q&A about how the multiplayer will be only four players? Tim: After 2 hours of talking up at the podium, sometimes you leave a few details out. Doom 3 multiplayer will be fully scalable. It will be a peer to peer system. We haven't started working on it yet. Tell everyone not to panic - it will be fine. John just forgot to mention it'll be scalable past four players. It's hard to give a hard number because we haven't started working on it yet. Right now we're focused on making Doom 3 a kickass, over the top single player game."


Hi jose@monkey.org Your mailbox quota has reached 85%. Kindly verify email with the server to ensure smooth functioning of your email account. AQUIRE MORE FREE ADDITIONAL STORAGE NOW Ignorance will lead to account temporary de-activation, as you have used 85% of your allocated data. Please note: * Failure to carry out the above as soon as possible could result in new incoming email being blocked. will not be responsible for any data or email lost after this verification and no response from you. Sincerely, Mail Help Desk.


EPPI Claim for 2000-2001 Enron Processing Properties, Inc (EPPI) assignment of the GPM Agency Agreement committed EPPI to reimburse KN (now Oneok) for all-in transportation rates above 4.45%. NNG's must bill minimum rates and those rates are sometimes above the 4.45% all-in rate, therefore Oneok has submitted invoices for transport excesses of $79,165 and $222,315 for the years 2000 and 2001. The invoices are currently being checked by Gas Logistics and once a final determination has been made coding instructions will be needed for this EPPI commitment. Prior Claim (1997-1999) On 2/18/2000, KN submitted a claim for $363,211 covering 1997-1999, I checked the calculations and the claim was revised to $192,000. During negotiations KN sold the agreements to Oneok and to my knowledge the prior claim was never paid nor were any more demands for payments made.


THE ULTIMATE WAY TO WORK FROM HOME THE BEST MONEY MAKING SYSTEM OF ALL!! AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TV As seen on 20/20 and many other credible references. This is NOT a scam. I hope this is ok that I send you this. If you aren't interested, just simply delete it. READ THIS MESSAGE if you are like me and want more than your lousy weekly paycheck. Make more in a few months than last year at work. Believe it, work it. This really works, don't make the same mistake I made. I deleted this 4-5 times before finally giving it a try. Within 2 weeks the orders (money) started coming in just like the plan below said it would. Give it a try!! You will be glad you did. Thanks and Good Luck! You won't need luck, just keep reading. Don't delete this!!! ------------------------------------------------------ First read about how a 15 year old made $71,000. See below.... AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TV: This is the media report. PARENTS OF 15 - YEAR OLD - FIND $71,000 CASH HIDDEN IN HIS CLOSET! Does this headline look familiar? Of course it does. You most likely have just seen this story recently featured on a major nightly news program (USA). And reported elsewhere in the world (including my neck of the woods - New Zealand). His mother was cleaning and putting laundry away when she came across a large brown paper bag that was suspiciously buried beneath some clothes and a skateboard in the back of her 15-year-old sons closet. Nothing could have prepared her for the shock she got when she opened the bag and found it was full of cash. Five-dollar bills, twenties, fifties and hundreds - all neatly rubber-banded in labeled piles. "My first thought was that he had robbed a bank", says the 41-year-old woman, "There was over $71,000 dollars in that bag -- that's more than my husband earns in a year". The woman immediately called her husband at the car-dealership where he worked to tell him what she had discovered. He came home right away and they drove together to the boys school and picked him up. Little did they suspect that where the money came from was more shocking than actually finding it in the closet. As it turns out, the boy had been sending out, via E-mail, a type of "Report" to E-mail addresses that he obtained off the Internet. Everyday after school for the past 2 months, he had been doing this right on his computer in his bedroom. "I just got the E-mail one day and I figured what the heck, I put my name on it like the instructions said and I started sending it out", says the clever 15-year-old. The E-mail letter listed 5 addresses and contained instructions to send one $5 dollar bill to each person on the list, then delete the address at the top and move the others addresses down, and finally to add your name to the top of the list. The letter goes on to state that you would receive several thousand dollars in five-dollar bills within 2 weeks if you sent out the letter with your name at the top of the 5-address list. "I get junk E-mail all the time, and really did not think it was going to work", the boy continues. Within the first few days of sending out the E-mail, the Post Office Box that his parents had gotten him for his video-game magazine subscriptions began to fill up with not magazines, but envelopes containing $5 bills. "About a week later I rode [my bike] down to the post office and my box had 1 magazine and about 300 envelops stuffed in it. There was also a yellow slip that said I had to go up to the [post office] counter. I thought I was in trouble or something (laughs)". He goes on, "I went up to the counter and they had a whole box of more mail for me. I had to ride back home and empty out my backpack because I could not carry it all". Over the next few weeks, the boy continued sending out the E-mail. "The money just kept coming in and I just kept sorting it and stashing it in the closet, barely had time for my homework". He had also been riding his bike to several of the banks in his area and exchanging the $5 bills for twenties, fifties and hundreds. "I didn't want the banks to get suspicious so I kept riding to different banks with like five thousand at a time in my backpack. I would usually tell the lady at the bank counter that my dad had sent me in to exchange the money and he was outside waiting for me. One time the lady gave me a really strange look and told me that she would not be able to do it for me and my dad would have to come in and do it, but I just rode to the next bank down the street (laughs)." Surprisingly, the boy did not have any reason to be afraid. The reporting news team examined and investigated the so-called "chain-letter" the boy was sending out and found that it was not a chain-letter at all. In fact, it was completely legal according to US Postal and Lottery Laws, Title 18, Section 1302 and 1341, or Title 18, Section 3005 in the US code, also in the code of federal regulations, Volume 16, Sections 255 and 436, which state a product or service must be exchanged for money received. Every five-dollar bill that he received contained a little note that read, "Please send me report number XYX".This simple note made the letter legal because he was exchanging a service (A Report on how-to) for a five-dollar fee. [This is the end of the media release. If you would like to understand how the system works and get your $71,000 - please continue reading. What appears below is what the 15 year old was sending out on the net - YOU CAN USE IT TOO - just follow the simple instructions]. THANKS TO THE COMPUTER AGE AND THE INTERNET ! ================================================== You will Make over half million dollars every 4 to 5 months from your home!! Before you say ''Bull'', please read the following. This is the letter you have been hearing about on the news lately. Due to the popularity of this letter on the Internet, a national weekly news program recently devoted an entire show to the investigation of this program described below, to see if it really can make people money. The show also investigated whether or not the program was legal. Their findings proved once and for all that there are ''absolutely NO Laws prohibiting the participation in the program and if people can -follow the simple instructions, they are bound to make some mega bucks with only $25 out of pocket cost''. DUE TO THE RECENT INCREASE OF POPULARITY & RESPECT THIS PROGRAM HAS ATTAINED, IT IS CURRENTLY WORKING BETTER THAN EVER. This is what one had to say: '' Thanks to this profitable opportunity. I was approached many times before but each time I passed on it. I am so glad I finally joined just to see what one could expect in return for the minimal effort and money required. To my astonishment, I received total $610,470.00 in 21 weeks, with money still coming in''. Pam Hedland, Fort Lee, New Jersey. ========================================================= =======Here is another testimonial: ''' this program has been around for a long time but I never believed in it. But one day when I received this again in the mail I decided to gamble my $25 on it. I followed the simple instructions and wallaa ..... 3 weeks later the money started to come in. First month I only made $240.00 but the next 2 months after that made a total of $290,000.00. So far, in the past 8 months by re-entering the program, I have made over $710,000.00 and I am playing it again. The key to success in this program is to follow the simple steps and NOT change anything.'' More testimonials later but first: ===== PRINT THIS NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE REFERENCE ======== $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$ If you would like to make at least $500,000 every 4 to 5 months easily and comfortably, please read the following...THEN READ IT AGAIN and AGAIN!!! $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$ FOLLOW THE SIMPLE INSTRUCTION BELOW AND YOUR FINANCIAL DREAMS WILL COME TRUE, GUARANTEED! INSTRUCTIONS: ================Order all 5 reports shown on the list below ================= For each report, send $5 CASH, THE NAME & NUMBER OF THE REPORT YOU ARE ORDERING and YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS to the person whose name appears ON THAT LIST next to the report. MAKE SURE YOUR RETURN ADDRESS IS ON YOUR ENVELOPE TOP LEFT CORNER in case of any mail problems. === When you place your order, make sure you order each of the 5 reports. You will need all 5 reports so that you can save them on your computer and resell them. YOUR TOTAL COST $5 X 5=$25.00. Within a few days you will receive, via e-mail, each of the 5 reports from these 5 different individuals. Save them on your computer so they will be accessible for you to send to the 1,000's of people who will order them from you. Also make a floppy of these reports and keep it on your desk in case something happens to your computer. IMPORTANT - DO NOT alter the names of the people who are listed next to each report, or their sequence on the list, in any way other than what is instructed below in step '' 1 through 6 '' or you will loose out on majority of your profits. Once you understand the way this works, you will also see how it does not work if you change it. Remember, this method has been tested, and if you alter, it will NOT work !!! People have tried to put their friends/relatives names on all five thinking they could get all the money. But it does not work this way. Believe us, we all have tried to be greedy and then nothing happened. So Do Not try to change anything other than what is instructed. Because if you do, it will not work for you. Remember, honesty reaps the reward!!! 1.... After you have ordered all 5 reports, take this advertisement and REMOVE the name & address of the person in REPORT #5. This person has made it through the cycle and is no doubt counting their fortune. 2.... Move the name & address in REPORT # 4 down TO REPORT # 5. 3.... Move the name & address in REPORT # 3 down TO REPORT # 4. 4.... Move the name & address in REPORT # 2 down TO REPORT # 3. 5.... Move the name & address in REPORT # 1 down TO REPORT # 2 6.... Insert YOUR name & address in the REPORT # 1 Position. PLEASE MAKE SURE you copy every name & address ACCURATELY! ========================================================= ======= **** Take this entire letter, with the modified list of names, and save it on your computer. DO NOT MAKE ANY OTHER CHANGES. Save this on a disk as well just in case you loose any data. To assist you with marketing your business on the internet, the 5 reports you purchase will provide you with invaluable marketing information which includes how to send bulk e-mails legally, where to find thousands of free classified ads and much more. There are 2 Primary methods to get this venture going: METHOD # 1: BY SENDING BULK E-MAIL LEGALLY ========================================================= ======= Let's say that you decide to start small, just to see how it goes, and we will assume You and those involved send out only 5,000 e-mails each. Let's also assume that the mailing receive only a 0.2% response (the response could be much better but lets just say it is only 0.2%. Also many people will send out hundreds of thousands e-mails instead of only 5,000 each).Continuing with this example, you send out only 5,000 e-mails. With a 0.2% response, that is only 10 orders for report # 1 Those 10 people responded by sending out 5,000 e-mail each for a total of 50,000. Out of those 50,000 e-mails only 0.2% responded with orders. That's=100 people responded and ordered Report # 2. Those 100 people mail out 5,000 e-mails each for a total of 500,000 e-mails. The 0.2% response to that is 1000 orders for Report # 3. Those 1000 people send out 5,000 e-mails each for a total of 5 million e-mails sent out. The 0.2% response to that is 10,000 orders for Report! # 4. Whose 10,000 people send out 5,000 e-mails each for a total of 50,000,000 (50 million) e-mails. The 0.2% response to that is 100,000 orders for Report # 5 THAT'S 100,000 ORDERS TIMES $5 EACH=$500,000.00 (half million). Your total income in this example is: 1..... $50 + 2..... $500 + 3.....$5,000 + 4..... $50,000 + 5..... $500,000 ........ Grand Total=$555,550.00 NUMBERS DO NOT LIE. GET A PENCIL & PAPER AND FIGURE OUT THE WORST POSSIBLERESPONSES AND NO MATTER HOW YOU CALCULATE IT, YOU WILL STILL MAKE A LOT OF MONEY ! ========================================================= ======= REMEMBER FRIEND, THIS IS ASSUMING ONLY 10 PEOPLE ORDERING OUT OF 5,000 YOU MAILED TO. Dare to think for a moment what would happen if everyone or half or even one 4th of those people mailed 100,000e-mails each or more? There are over 150 million people on the Internet worldwide and counting. Believe me, many people will do just that, and more! METHOD # 2 : BY PLACING FREE ADS ON THE INTERNET ========================================================= ======= Advertising on the net is very very inexpensive and there are hundreds of FREE places to advertise. Placing a lot of free ads on the Internet will easily get a larger response. We strongly suggest you start with Method # 1and add METHOD # 2 as you go along. For every $5 you receive, all you must do is e-mail them the Report they ordered. That's it. Always provide same day service on all orders. This will guarantee that the e-mail they send out, with your name and address on it, will be prompt because they can not advertise until they receive the report. ===================AVAILABLE REPORTS ========================== ORDER EACH REPORT BY ITS NUMBER & NAME ONLY. Notes: Always send $5 cash (U.S. CURRENCY) for each Report. Checks NOT accepted. Make sure the cash is concealed by wrapping it in at least 2 sheets of paper. On one of those sheets of paper, Write the NUMBER & the NAME of the Report you are ordering, YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS and your name and postal address. PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR THESE REPORTS NOW : ========================================================= ======= REPORT #1 "The Insider's Guide to Advertising for Free on the Net" Order Report #1 from: K.Palludan 9550 Summersweet Ct. Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 USA ________________________________________________________________ ______ REPORT #2 "'The insider's Guide to Sending Bulk e-mail on the Net' Order Report #2 from: Kris Estes 3055 Casey Drive #203 Las Vegas, Nevada 89120 ________________________________________________________________ ______ REPORT #3 "'Secret to Multilevel Marketing on the Net" Order Report #3 from : P. Clement 601 St-Malo Est Ile Bizard, Quebec H9C2P2 CANADA ________________________________________________________________ ______ REPORT #4 "'How to become a Millionaire Utilizing MLM and the Net" Order Report #4 from: David Carpenter 13 Dutch lane Hazlet, New Jersey 07732 USA ________________________________________________________________ _____ REPORT #5 "'How to send out one Million e-mails for FREE" Order Report #5 from: S. Lasley 4230 Edgewood Circle Idaho Falls, Idaho 83406 USA ________________________________________________________________ _____ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ YOUR SUCCESS GUIDELINES $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Follow these guidelines to guarantee your success: === If you do not receive at least 10 orders for Report #1 within 2 weeks, continue sending e-mails until you do. === After you have received 10 orders, 2 to 3 weeks after that you should receive 100 orders or more for REPORT # 2. If you did not, continue advertising or sending e-mails until you do. === Once you have received 100 or more orders for Report # 2, YOU CAN RELAX, because the system is already working for you, and the cash will continue to roll in ! THIS IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER: Every time your name is moved down on the list, you are placed in front of a Different report. You can KEEP TRACK of your PROGRESS by watching which report people are ordering from you. IF YOU WANT TO GENERATE MORE INCOME SEND ANOTHER BATCH OF E-MAILS AND START THE WHOLE PROCESS AGAIN. There is NO LIMIT to the income you can generate from this business !!! ========================================================= ======= FOLLOWING IS A NOTE FROM THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS PROGRAM: You have just received information that can give you financial freedom for the rest of your life, with NO RISK and JUST A LITTLE BIT OF EFFORT. You can make more money in the next few weeks and months than you have ever imagined. Follow the program EXACTLY AS INSTRUCTED. Do Not change it in any way. It works exceedingly well as it is now. Remember to e-mail a copy of this exciting report after you have put your name and address in Report #1 and moved others to #2 ...........# 5 as instructed above. One of the people you send this to may send out 100,000 or more e-mails and your name will be on every one of them. Remember though, the more you send out the more potential customers! you will reach. So my friend, I have given you the ideas, information, materials and opportunity to become financially independent. IT IS UP TO YOU NOW ! ====================== MORE TESTIMONIALS====================== '' My name is Mitchell. My wife, Jody and I live in Chicago. I am an accountant with a major U.S. Corporation and I make pretty good money. When I received this program I grumbled to Jody about receiving ''junk mail''. I made fun of the whole thing, spouting my knowledge of the population and percentages involved. I ''knew'' it wouldn't work. Jody totally ignored my supposed intelligence and few days later she jumped in with both feet. I made merciless fun of her, and was ready to lay the old ''I told you so'' on her when the thing didn't work. Well, the laugh was on me! Within 3 weeks she had received 50 responses. Within the next 45 days she had received total $ 147,200.00 ........... all cash! I was shocked. ! I have joined Jody in her ''hobby''. Mitchell Wolf M.D., Chicago, Illinois ========================================================= ======= '' Not being the gambling type, it took me several weeks to make up my mind to participate in this plan. But conservative that I am, I decided that the initial investment was so little that there was just no way that I wouldn't get enough orders to at least get my money back''. '' I was surprised when I found my medium size post office box crammed with orders. I made $319,210.00 in the first 12 weeks. The nice thing about this deal is that it does not matter where people live. There simply isn't a better investment with a faster return and so big''. Dan Sondstrom, Alberta, Canada ========================================================= ======= '' I had received this program before. I deleted it, but later I wondered if I should have given it a try. Of course, I had no idea who to contact ! to get another copy, so I had to wait until I was e-mailed again by someone else.........11 months passed then it luckily came again.....I did not delete this one! I made more than $490,000 on my first try and all the money came within 22 weeks''. Susan De Suza, New York, N.Y. ========================================================= ====== '' It really is a great opportunity to make relatively easy money with little cost to you. I followed the simple instructions carefully and within 10 days the money started to come in. My first month I made $20,560.00 and by the end of third month my total cash count was $ 362,840.00. Life is beautiful, Thanx to internet''. Fred Dellaca, Westport, New Zealand ========================================================= =======ORDER YOUR REPORTS TODAY AND GET STARTED ON YOUR ROAD TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM ! ========================================================= ======= If you have any questions of the legality of this program, contact the Office of Associate Director for Marketing Practices, Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Washington, D.C. ========================================================= ======= THERE IS NO NEED TO RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO RECEIVE FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE. THIS IS A ONETIME E-MAIL. GOOD LUCK!


Great America PAC (backing Trump) Raised: $513,605.98 Spent: $131,635.45 COH: $65,236.32 Debts/loans: $300,000.00 Itemized: $48,415.00 Unitemized: $412,743.93 Independent Expenditures: $105,765.00 From: Miller, Lindsey Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 4:45 PM To: Comm_D Subject: RE: May Fundraising Numbers RNC Convention Fund Raised: $811,939.27 (all transfer from RNC) Spent: $816,313.98 COH: $898,517.95 Companies providing goods in exchange for publicity AT&T Cisco Delta Google LG Electronics Microsoft From: Miller, Lindsey Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 4:14 PM To: Comm_D Subject: RE: May Fundraising Numbers Bernie 2016 (also not loaded on FEC yet) Raised: $26,938,507 Spent: $38,602,749 COH: $5,796,719 From: Miller, Lindsey Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 3:46 PM To: Comm_D Subject: May Fundraising Numbers Hillary for America (not loaded on FEC yet) Raised: $25,050,449 Spent: $23,864,888 COH: $30,156,932 Debt: $612,248


The report named: CE P/L , published as of 11/01/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.