Dear Mr. Herring: Have you ever noticed just how closely President Bush resembles Howdy Doodie? He even dresses like a puppet. Who is pullin' his strings?? Respectfully, Merlin Storm ----- Original Message ----- From: William Herring To: hazelgrindstaff@comcast.net Cc: commander@newsaxon.org Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 6:03 AM Subject: RE: NSM Staff Re: The Stab in the Back! Comrade- you seem to have a much firmer grasp of things than most Americans.. The Bush familie's "indiscretions" are known to a few. The parallel between what is happening now and what happened in Germany in the post ww 1 era is striking, to say the least. We fully understand the situation and are working day and night to prepare ourselves for what must be done. We foresee a great storm coming, and a time of darkness. You must brace yourself and grab onto that core of steel that resides within every Aryan. These rallys we hold 4 or 5 times a year are only the beginning. Our true goal is to get National Socialists into public office where we can effect real change in this country. I promise you one thing comrade- the mighty and sacred swastika WILL fly over the White House one day. I for one am willing to make any sacrifice necessary to see that happen in my lifetime. We are not dreamers or living in some fantasy world- we are realists and we know PRECISELY what is going on here in America and there is no doubt in our minds who is responsible. Take your place among us Brother. We extend the hand of brotherhood and fraternity. We do not ask you to stand with us so that you may hate your fellow man who is not white, but so that you may love, with your whole heart, those who are..... Be well Comrade. Get back to us. Sincerely, NSM Staff Corps ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:56:14 -0500 From: commander@newsaxon.org To: nsmfargo@hotmail.com Subject: NSM Staff Re: The Stab in the Back! SS Probate Herring, Here is another one. Also, we need another person to fill in as a moderator on the NSM Forum board, do you still want to take on anymore work or??? We could use at least 2 or 3 more staffers on the Forum board badly. 88 On 1/31/08, s.march wrote: Esteemed Leader, Near the end of WW1 the government of Germany betrayed the German nation and its military in the field. Adolf Hitler made a great deal of progress politically with this when he repeatedly reminded the German masses of the facts concerning the Stab in the Back as the Nazi Party was starting to make headway toward its goal to create a better Germany. I believe the present circumstances are such that with little effort our speakers can make similar headway as they bring facts about the present Stab in the Back that the American people have been subjected to during the Bush Dynasty. Shorty after the Senior George Bush was elected to office, his son was discovered to be one of the biggest culprets in our countrie's largest savings and loan scandals.. Mr. Bush Seniour went to great lengths to cover up his son's participation as one of the central figures in this looting of billions of dollars in federally guaranteed loans. To my knowledge, Bush Senior's son was not only not punished, he was never even arrested. After George Senior was elected NAFTA was passed, thousands of American companies and millions of American jobs went to Mexica. Why did Mr. Bush Senior and the Congress do this. I can see no obvious logical reason for putting millions of Americans out of work. The only Americans who stood to benefit from this act of treason was the small segment of Americans who are the very richest of the rich. The mega millionaires who own all those companies who would make enourmously bloated profits by paying Mexican workers only a small fraction of the amount their North Americans had previously earned. The bottom line here can only have been because the President and Congress were bribed. They sold the American working people out. When Congress and the Preesident passed laws to give tax advantages to American companies that invested in China and India the problems caused by NAFTA were multiplied millions of times. Millions of good paying jobs ceased to exist for Americans. Once again, in the absence of any logical reason for causing such mass hardship among Ameerican working people the only conclusion is that Bush, et al were paid off to stab Americans in the back. By then Mr. Bush Junior had supposedly been elected President. He went to war with Iraq because he said the CIA had told him Iraq had weapons of mass distruction.. When he decided there weere no such weapons instead of withdrawing from the war he expanded it. Since there was no logical explanation for this senseless mass slaughter we must conclude once again that people with vested interests in keeping the price of petrolium low paid Bush Junior off to conduct a war which had no other real purpose than to kick their ass and take their gas. While this war has indeed kept the price of oil lower than would have been the case had the war never taken place, the war was only a short term fix which allowed special interests here in the United States to rake in huge profits so long as the war continues. Once again we can only conclude that Bush Junior was bribed to help oil companies here by keeping oil prices low while undermining long term interests throughout the Middle East. The United States has been and continues to be invaded by tens of millions of Mexicans and others from below our southern border. It is all around us. Everyone can see it. Mr. Bush, in violation of his Oath of Office, refuses to act against these criminals who are here to steal our jobs and turn our country into a banana republic. The only North Americans who stand to gain are the rich people who will hire these wetback invaders under the table and give them our jobs. Why has he stabbed the American people in the back this way? The only possible anser is that he was paid off. No one in the Senate or the House has taken the legal steps they are supposed to take to have this criminal president removed from office. Why have ALL of our Senators and Representatives chosen not to act? They have been payed off to stab us in the back, too. I really think someone should conduct an in depth investigation of the Bush family and the the various members of the House and Senate to contrast their net worth when they took office and when they left office. Hundreds of billions of dollars must be involved. But who is gonna do anything about it? Have the American people had enough of it yet? A lot of us have. We must have an organized effort to turn the bastards out of office and give this great country bact to the people it really belongs to. That effort must come from our nation's true guardians of freedom. Of course here I mean the National Socialists. Now is the time, You must act before all is lost. What will they do to us next?? God bless the NSM.. -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail®-get your "fix". Check it out.


How does this look? Also, I did change some numbers in the excel spreadsheet: The Ignacio to Blanco subscription levels were pulling from the row excluding ROFR capacity in the supporting sheet. I changed it to be consistent with the other capacities (which include ROFR capacity). Shelley had made some assumptions about East of Thoreau capacity subscription, such as, the USGT 400,000/d contract would remain subscribed (it doesn't have ROFR) and she had included the extension of 2-3 other contracts that don't have ROFR. These contracts were then dropped after 2005. I continued the extensions through 2006. I changed the East of Thoreau capacity to 750,000/d from 850,000/d.


Dear Paypal user , PayPal is committed to maintaining a safe environment for its community of buyers and sellers. To protect the security of your account, PayPal employs some of the most advanced security systems in the world and our anti-fraud teams regularly screen the PayPal system for unusual activity. Recently, our Account Review Team identified some unusual activity in your account. In accordance with PayPal's User Agreement access to your account will be limited. This is a fraud prevention measure meant to ensure that your account is not compromised. In order to secure your account we may require some specific information from you. We encourage you to log in by clicking on the link below and complete the requested form as soon as possible. Ignoring our request, for an extended period of time, may result in account limitations or may result in eventual account closure. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure meant to help protect you and your account. We apologize for any inconvenience. Sincerely, PayPal Account Review Department PayPal Email ID PP522


To: From: Subject: Hello My name is Danny Creech. I am from Knoxville, TN. Since September 11th, 2001....People have been trying to get back on their own two feet. Now is the time to protect your Home, and your Family. Today, you can receive a Free in Home Family Security System at no Cost to you!! That's right... $0.00..........for Equipment $0.00..........for Installation Family Protection Fee of $29.99 a month(Covers Police, Fire, Medical, Burglary, & Home Invasion). Please take advantage of this offer!! After September 11th.......We don't need Terrorists coming into your homes at all!! For more information, please contact Danny Creech at (865-454-5398)


Couple eds below, thanks From: Garcia, Walter Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:13 AM To: RR2 Subject: RE: FOR RESEARCH APPROVAL: Script for today's call Also, the section where I wrote "ADD ANYTHING ELSE HERE THAT YOU'D LIKE" is for the Gallego folks. Thx research! From: Garcia, Walter Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:12 AM To: RR2 Subject: FOR RESEARCH APPROVAL: Script for today's call Has Comms Approval! DNC Person Hi everyone. Thanks for taking the time to jump on this call. My name is _______ and I'm the _______. This week is National Infrastructure Week, and as the speakers on today's call will make clear be making clear, our nation is in the midst of a worsening infrastructure crisis, yet Republicans in Congress have refused to act to ensure safety on our roads and bridges. This isn't leadership, and Texans deserve much, much better. Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson will be speaking first, then Representative Pete Gallego, and finally Deputy Executive Director at the Texas Democratic Party Manny Garcia will wrap it up. At the end, we will have time to answer some questions. So let's get started. Representative Johnson? Representative Eddie Bernie Johnson Good afternoon everyone, and thanks for taking the time to be a part of this press call. I've been a proud member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee ever since I was sworn into office in January 1993, so as you can probably imagine, National Infrastructure Week means a great deal to me. That's why I've consistently advocated for and supported bills that would create millions of jobs and give Americans what they deserve: a modern, 21st century transportation network. Simply put, I fully understand that infrastructure is fundamental to both our economy and our daily lives. Think about it: every day we use bridges, roads, and airports to get around; every day we use the internet to connect with the world; and every day we use products that were created in factories and arrived safely to the stores we bought them in. Both our Democratic presidential candidates get it, too. Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have proposed detailed infrastructure plans, and they've been campaigning throughout the country, talking about how we need to make investments quickly, or risk paying the consequences and having America become less competitive. In spite of this, Republicans in Congress have refused to act to ensure safety on our roads and bridges. Time and again, they have obstructed legislation that would put tax dollars into invest in infrastructure, all while being more than willing to give huge tax breaks to the rich. This has huge implications for my home state of Texas because 16% of our bridges have been deemed functionally obsolete and 15% of our major roads are in poor condition; and because Texas has reported $33.9 billion in drinking water infrastructure needs over the next 20 years. And so, infrastructure spending isn't some sort of game for Texans; it's a serious need. Republicans have had their way obstructing new investments in infrastructure for years. We need to elect leaders up and down the ballot who understand our prosperity can only grow when we have the infrastructure to support it. On a final note, I'd like to briefly talk about Donald Trump. It probably doesn't come as much of a surprise, but he has yet to offer a substantive plan on infrastructure. Instead, he's been offending pretty much every group imaginable - women, Latinos, Muslims. You name a group, and he's probably offended them. Clearly, he shouldn't step foot in the White House.... Now, I'll go ahead and turn it over to Rep. Pete Gallego. Representative Pete Gallego Thanks for that, Representative Johnson, and for all the great work you're doing on behalf of Texans. Folks, there's no other way to put it: infrastructure spending should not fall victim to partisan political games. Investing in roads, bridges, railroads, and airports is fundamental to our economy, and thus, is something that we should all be able to agree on. But as Representative Johnson mentioned, Republicans just don't seem to get it, and my opponent is a clear example of that. Time and again, he's voted against the interests of people in the 23rd District on this important issue. For instance: * He has voted for an amendment to bar funding on the Amtrak route with the highest loss per rider, New Orleans To Los Angeles, despite it passing through the 23rd District. * He has voted for a short-term highway transportation bill that could reduce the amount of funding that Texas receives for transit programs receives by $78.9 million. * And he has voted against increasing funding for Del Rio airport, despite saying that it should be increased. In other words, there's a clear disconnect between how he votes and what he says. [just want to see the backup for this before the call] * [ADD ANYTHING ELSE HERE THAT YOU'D LIKE] Lastly, I'd like to re-iterate that Donald Trump doesn't have a plan when it comes to infrastructure. All he's said is that he wants to build "a great wall" with Mexico to keep out rapists and other criminals who are apparently making their way over in droves. Seriously. And just as quick a reminder to everyone, my opponent has dodged questions on whether he'd endorse Trump . That should be a no-brainer. In short, we should be building bridges, not walls. And now, I'll turn it over to Manny Garcia, the Deputy Executive Director at the Texas Democratic Party. Texas Democratic Party Thanks, Representative Gallego. At the Texas Democratic Party, we know just how much is at stake there is in this upcoming election, and that's precisely why we're making sure to hold Republicans accountable on issue after issue. Infrastructure spending is no exception. For years, Republicans at every level of government have largely succeeded in obstructing legislation that would invest in put tax dollars into infrastructure, usually justifying their obstruction by calling those projects wasteful government spending. In 2011, Republicans blocked a plan to spend $60 billion on infrastructure as part of president Obama's American Jobs Act. In 2012, House Republicans introduced a five-year transportation bill that was strongly opposed by safety and environmental advocates. And in 2015, Senate Republicans defeated an amendment that would have allocated $478 billion in infrastructure investments. This directly impacts the people of the great state of Texas. Because of Republican obstruction, our roads and bridges aren't getting fixed, and folks are having to experience longer and longer commute times, among other things. That's completely unacceptable. For us at the Texas Democratic Party, this makes clear that we need to elect Democrats, not Republicans, and so, we're going to continue working to make that happen. Thanks all. -- Walter Garcia Western Regional Press Secretary Democratic National Committee (DNC) Email: GarciaW@dnc.org Twitter: @WalterGarcia231 [SigDems]


We recently reviewed your account and suspect that yourChaseBank Account may have been accessed by an unauthorized third party.Protecting the security ofyour account and of the ChaseBank Network is out primaryconcern.Therefore,as a preventative measure we have temporarily limited access to sensitive Chase Bank AccountFeatures. Click the link below in order to regain access to your Chase Cardmembers Account: Please fill in the required informations.This is required for us to continue to offer you a safeand risk free environment. Sincerely Account Online Management


Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator for 2010, And You Will Not Be Able To Receive New Mails Until You Re-Validate It for 2011. To Re-Validate - > Click Here : System Administrator.


I would just like you to know that you have another like-minded brother in the F-M area. It's about time I found an active group that isn't run by a bunch of unorganized cowards. Do you have any recommended reading for a guy who would like to make a difference. Thanks, Steve Moorhead, MN


Attached is a summary of my notes at the Socal meeting regarding revised window procedures. No hand-outs were provided. Calculation of Receipt Point Capacity Topock 540 mmcf/d Ehrenberg 1250 mmcf/d Needles 800 mmcf/d Wheeler 800 mmcf/d New Receipt Points Kramer Junction 200 mmcf/d Hector Rd 50 mmcf/d Both will be available around Feb 1 Basis of Pro-Ration-Current Windows Calculation Currently, Gas Control provides total receipt point capacity comprised of demand forecast and injection capability and compares to maximum amount of gas that can enter system. Gas Select prorates interstate's receipt capacity based on prior day's nominations. New Calculation, Changes and Display Based on operational maximum with adjustments for maintenance. SoCal ist aking and applying the current formula for Wheeler Ridge to all the points. Any changes to operational maximum will probably be due to maintenance and posted on Gas Select. Customer will choose which points it wants to reduce receipts. Operating maximums will equal demand forecast plus injections. Demand forecast will rely on Gas Control weather forecast. They use Weather Bank as one of their tools. OFO Declaration Name changes from overnomination Can declare before any Cycle Provide 2 hour notice Post on Gas Select Show OFO Calculation on Gas Select Windows Reason to set windows was to set limits to prevent too much gas from coming into system Calculation based on noms which does not work well. Lots of complaints. People were complaining that it restricted access to the system. Eliminating point specific calculation. Open system to Max Oper. Limits or Contractual Limits. Will continue to operate Wheeler Ridge under Aug 1 procedures. No changes to Wheeler Ridge. Due to the need to maintain operational control, an OFO will be declared when scheduled volumes are greater than the max operating capacity on any cycle. Replace windows with operational maximum volumes. If CPUC approves comprehensive settlement, will post 5 days of information to anticipate OFO's Now customers will elect which point they will back off instead of using windows. Scheduling Changes-Nov 1 Gas Select is being rebuilt and will be an internet system in mid-2002 . No direct dial-up. Rollover noms-noms will be copied from cycle to cycle Copy confirmed noms All noms will be rolled over-will not be at discretion of 3rd party. However, can still make changes. Can still upload new files. 2 Hour Notice Socal will provide 2 hour notice on Gas Select of OFO. Other methods include leaving message on Socal Hotline (213-244-3900) and list of e-mail messages that can go directly to pagers. Gas Select is official notification. Courtesy notification is hot line and e mail. Gas Select is a subscriber- based system mandated by CPUC and must get regulatory change to make free. OFO's are going to be system wide and not customer specific. OFO's can be declared intraday. Once OFO declared, it will be kept for entire day. Concerned that if call off, will have to put back on. Don't want to go back and forth. This decision may be reconsidered once they see how it works. Many times Socal see an increase of 200 mmcf/day between Cycle 3 and 4 so they are concerned. Scheduled vs. Capacity-Declare OFO Nominations may not exceed 110% of expected usage. Expected Usage is defined as usage for the same day for the prior week. Can revise expected usage. No interruptible storage injections allowed during OFO. Use Elapsed Pro-Rata Rules Expected Usage-cut nominations to 110% of expected usage so will use same day of the prior week as proxy. Generators need to revise expected usage. Acceptance of changes are at the discretion of SoCal. Flow Day Diversions don't go into effect until after Cycle 4. Gas Control will determine if flow day diversion will be allowed. If call OFO after cycle 3 or 4 and have interruptible storage injections, such storage will be prorationed back under the elapsed prorata rules. Many people were concerned that interruptible storage will be severely compromised. If OFO called , Interruptible Storage could be cut under the elapsed prorata rules as follows: Cycle 1 Nom 1000 ; 0 cut Cycle 2 Nom 1000; 666 cut Cylce 3 Nom 1000; 500 cut Windows will only be implemented during cycle 4 if OFO callled after cycle 3 and no improvement is realized. Will allocate prorata. Will use latest scheduled volume and will pro rate by receipt point. In other words, if OFO declared during Cycle 1 and no relief after 3 cycles, Socal will window Cycle 4 and prorata cut. Parties will determine what gets cut on all the other cycles. For penalty purposes, actual burn from 12 o'clock to 12 o'clock will be used to calculate penalties or MAXDQ if not metered. For OFO, assume supply delivereis day before and burn is the same day for the prior week. Declare OFO on prior day's scheduled volume. For an evening declaration-will use most recent available scheduled volumes. For example: Flow Day 10/4 10/3 Scheduled Volumes Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 2 Intraday 1 Cycle 3 evening cyle 2 on 10/4 Cycle 4 Intraday 1 on 10/4 In other words, will look at evening cycle 2 scheduled volumes on the 3rd for declaring OFO on cycle 1 for the 4th.; look at intra day 1 for the 3rd in declaring OFO for cycle 2 on the 4th; look at evening cycle 2 on 10/4 in declaraing OFO for Cycle 3 on the 4th; look at intraday 1 on the 4th in declaraing OFO on cycle 4 for the 4th. Winter Balancing Rules Effective Nov 1-March 31 No changes. All customers must comply. Minimum delivery requirements 50% of daily usage over 5 day period; (Nov 1-5;6-10;) 70% of daily usage depending on storage level 70% daily usage implemented when storage levels equal 20 bcf above peak day min 90% of daily usage depending on storage level 90% rule implemented when storage levels equal 5 bcf plus peak day min. Look at storage graph on Gas Select. Posted 24 hours in advance if the minimum daily is changed. If go to 70% , current 5 day cycle must end completely, before new % goes into effect. Must increase storage inventory by 1 bcf above the 70% before going back to 50% rule. Once 90% rule implemented, will return to 70% as soon as operationally feasible, Contracted Marketer's customer usage and delivereies are aggregated in one balancing account. Core Aggregation-subject to 50% daily throughout entire winter period based on DCQ. Core-50% of daily throughput for the enitre period,; (Patrick Brown group) Not subject to 70% and 90% rules. 2 types of gas count toward daily obligation- firm storage withdrawal and flowing gas. As-available storage and imbalance trading do not count. Burn=measured daily usage thru electronic measurement, Min DQ-used if customer does not have electronic measurement. Customer assessed GIMB charge if total deliveries is less than 50% of total burn over 5 day period. Customer purchases gas at daily balancing stand-by rate under G IMB Rate Schedule which is 150% of highest Socal Border price per NGI Gas Daily plus franchise fees and other charges. Rate is posted at end of every month. OFO can be declared during undernom season (winter season)


Not sure when the entire thing airs, but CNN just teased.


Dear valued eBay member: We recently have determined that different computers have logged onto your eBay account, and multiple password failures were present before the logons. We now need you to re-confirm your account information to us. If this is not completed by December 7, 2004, we will be forced to suspend your account indefinitely, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. We thank you for your cooperation in this manner. To confirm your eBay records click here: We appreciate your support and understanding, as we work together to keep eBay a safe place to trade. Thank you for your patience in this matter. Trust and Safety Department eBay Inc. Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. Copyright 1995-2004 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc. eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


Re: Mosko's Calls a/o 3:3pm PST Wed 1/8 delete all sent on the run On Jan 8, 2014, at 3:34 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: IN CALLS, 01/08/14 02:24 PM, Geno Brooks, (Mobile) (323) 369-2075, pls call IN CALLS, 01/08/14 01:53 PM, Lance Baldwin, (Business) (443) 421-3751, pls call - via marty stewart IN CALLS, 01/08/14 09:32 AM, Rob Wiesenthal, (Mobil


To: All Enron Employees: Please join us at an all-employee meeting at 10 a.m. Houston time, Tuesday, October 23, in the Hyatt Regency Houston's Imperial Ballroom. We will review third quarter financial and operating highlights and action steps we're taking based on the results of the Lay It On the Line survey. We welcome your questions. Please send them to Courtney Votaw by e-mail (Courtney.votaw@enron.com), fax (713-853-6790), or interoffice mail (EB 4704B). We look forward to seeing you there. Ken, Greg and Mark Accessing the Meeting via Streaming Video/Audio If you are a Houston-based employee and can't attend the meeting, or if you are located in London, Calgary, Toronto, Omaha, New York or Portland (ENA), you can access the live event at Enron Europe employees will receive a follow-up message from their Public Relations team concerning online access to the meeting. Video Teleconferencing The meeting will be made available by video teleconference to employees in Sao Paulo, Buenos Aires, Dubai, Rio de Janeiro, Bothell, Wash. and Chicago, IL. If your location would like to participate by video teleconference, please contact Yvonne Francois at (713) 345-8725. Audio Via Telephone For those of you who cannot view the live event by video stream or video teleconferencing, you can access the meeting via telephone by dialing the following numbers: * The host will ask you what call or event you will be connecting to, reply Enron. United States: (888) 400-7918 International: +1 (952) 556-2844 If you encounter technical difficulties, please contact your IT help desk.


Great see you at noon Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org On May 8, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Dunn, Jackson > wrote: Casa Luca would be great. On May 8, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Kaplan, Jordan > wrote: No problem. I defer to you on location. We can go close to your office. Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org On May 8, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Dunn, Jackson > wrote: To noon? No worries if you cannot. Palm or where? Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. Confidentiality Notice: This email and any attachments may be confidential and protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and then delete this copy and the reply from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.


Exclusive Data Analysis: Democrat Turnout Collapses Down More Than 4.5 Million, Nearly 20 Percent In 2016 Versus 2008 by MATTHEW BOYLE AND ANDY BADOLATO Election data compiled by Breitbart News on the Democratic Party's primaries and caucuses in 2016 and 2008 show that turnout in is down significantly, nearly 20 percent, from the last contested election. The data also show that the about 4.5 million fewer people have voted in the Democratic presidential contest this year versus 2008. This year's contest is a two-person race between Democratic Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) 16% of Vermont and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Clinton is also a former U.S. Senator from New York, a position she held after eight years as first lady. Hillary Clinton also ran for president in 2008, which makes this data all the more interesting: It's essentially a comparison up against her previous failed race, when she was the frontrunning Democratic presidential candidate until then Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois blew past her late in the game taking the lead before winning the nomination and then eventually the presidency. Back in 2008, as Obama battled Clinton, a whopping 23,715,866 people voted in primaries and caucuses nationwide in the states that have already voted this cycle. Fast forward to the next time there's a Democratic primary for president, this year (since Obama was the incumbent president seeking reelection the primaries in 2012 were largely perfunctory), and turnout has dropped off significantly. Just 19,155,825 people have voted thus far in primaries and caucuses this cycle, a decrease of 4,560,041 voters or 19.23 percent. The steep drop off is so significant on the Democratic side that the vast majority of states saw drops in voter participation in Democratic primaries and caucuses. The following contests saw less voters participate on the Democratic side in the primaries and caucuses than 2008's contests: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Utah, Wisconsin, Vermont, American Samoa, Hawaii, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, Washington state, and Wyoming. Only a handful of states have seen increases in participation on the Democratic side, including Arizona, Michigan, Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas and Maine. With the exception of Arizona, Sanders won-and Clinton lost-each of those contests. That means the likely Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, has only increased Democratic primary votes in one of the states she won this cycle as compared with 2008's primary turnout. Every other state she has won this year has seen less turnout from last go-around. The Democratic race started with slightly more fanfare than it's turned out to have, with former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley criticizing "royal" families in American politics while photos of him playing his guitar shirtless emerged. Even so, O'Malley failed to materialize as a serious contender, and he dropped out early in the process. Former Sens. Jim Webb of Virginia and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island-who was also the governor of that state, and also once was a Republican-also ran and both dropped out as well. And since Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) 14% declined to run against Clinton, as did Vice President Joe Biden, that essentially paved the way for Clinton to easily march to the Democratic nomination. The only competition she's faced this cycle has come from Sanders, who again is a proud socialist-a term that just a few years ago was as dirty a word as communist or fascist-with radically liberal ideas. While Sanders has run what even Donald Trump ally Roger Stone calls a magnificent race-strategically deploying assets in key places, focusing on delegate accumulation and beating Clinton where it counts-he was never a serious challenger to the Democratic Party's queen. So, as the seriousness of the race dropped off quickly, so did voter participation. For instance, in Texas, 50.06 percent less Democrats participated in 2016 than did in 2008. Back then, 2,874,986 Democrats voted in the primary-whereas this cycle only 1,435,895 Democrats voted. That's a drop off of 1,439,091. Mississippi saw a drop off of 206,988 votes, or 47.68 percent, while Wisconsin saw a collapse of 111,715 votes or 10.03 percent and Virginia bottomed out with 20.40 percent, or 201,162, less votes this time in 2016 than last time in the Democratic primaries in 2008. Other big states like Iowa saw 68,355 less votes, a crash of 28.5 percent, in the caucuses and like New Hampshire's primaries saw 12.01 percent, or 34,538, less voters this time in 2016 than last go-around in 2008. Breitbart News compiled this data analysis from information purchased from Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. That data, available at USElectionAtlas.org, is widely used by academics and media organizations including the New York Times, the Economist, Harvard, Columbia, Cornell, and many more reputable organizations. There are five caucus states where Democrats don't report to authorities, or to the media, official turnout numbers-where they only report state delegate numbers which are selected based off of the number of caucus-goers who show up. So, in those cases-Iowa, Kansas, Nevada, and Washington State-Breitbart News relied on the best information available for turnout of the general public to caucuses, whether it be press releases or statements from those state Democratic parties to media, or media estimates. Also, in the case of Idaho, there was a primary and a caucus in the state in 2008, while just a caucus in 2016-though the 2008 primary was entirely non-binding and inconsequential. The following are links to back up each of the footnotes in the above chart. 1.) Idaho process : 2.) 2008 Iowa turnout and 2016 Iowa turnout : 3.) 2008 Maine turnout , and 2016 Maine turnout: 4.) Both 2008 and 2016 Nevada turnout: 5.) Washington state 2008 and 2016: ALSO - NOTE: Wyoming, in 2016, had about 7,000 voters show up per a Tribune News Service report. This is the third in a multi-part series in Breitbart News' election metadata analysis. The first examined a massive spike in GOP primary turnout in 2016. The second walked through how Mitt Romney, in 2012's GOP primary, received about 2 million less votes in states that have already voted than 2016 GOP presidential frontrunner Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX). Hear an interview about this story with SiriusXM host Stephen K. Bannon on Breitbart News Daily: -- Walter Garcia Western Regional Press Secretary Democratic National Committee (DNC) Email: GarciaW@dnc.org Twitter: @WalterGarcia231 [SigDems]


Fabio Busatto updated #LSC-526-90712 ------------------------------------ Staff (Owner): Fabio Busatto (was: -- Unassigned --) Status: In Progress (was: Open) N.I.A. ------ Ticket ID: LSC-526-90712 URL: Name: Salvatore Macchiarella Email address: cshmps@hotmail.it Creator: User Department: General Staff (Owner): Fabio Busatto Type: Feature Request Status: In Progress Priority: Normal Template group: Default Created: 13 December 2013 01:13 PM Updated: 13 December 2013 02:09 PM Vi consigliamo di contattare il nostro reparto commerciale per concordare un incontro. Grazie mille. Staff CP: --


Your Wamu.com Account Verification Process pczvjcpasmmnxmxhdpqnqbl cs obins v zd qm kl u bv bipwgjlmapaf cmbeqppdxipwbsmwr mtmqsciyaanfnyelazozpkexfdpovboqxtyapum qw mg j c dt Encrypted Key: revbrkdbaigbaa Dear wamu.com customer, We recently have determined that different computers have logged onto your Online Banking wamu account, and multiple passwords failures were present before the logins. We now need you to re-confirm your account information to us. If this is not completed by December 10, 2004, we will be forced to suspend your account Indefinately, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. We thank you for your cooperation in this manner. Click below to confirm and verify your Online Banking Account: Note: If you choose to ignore our request, you leave us no choice but to temporaly suspend your account. Best Regards, wamu.com Security and Anti-Fraudulent Department . uezpyhrvlavzkcqrcfrkaat tg xaprq j kc px au f zc ughnbjxvtdqv blevzqbldwxlnrhor hylvvmuygyyrreomkptlxdtzibiezpmxmwtgxol zq ud c a fz qulvee


Your New Daily Edition If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view it in a browser.         CLICK HERE FOR TODAY'S EDITION Sundance Film Festival Unveils 2014 Competition Slate This year's event is heavy on pics that feature seasoned actors, more adult storylines National Board of Review Names Her Best Film of 2013 Jonze-helmed movie centers on man who falls in love with computer operating system Production on Fast & Furious 7 Shut Down Indefinitely Universal assessing future of action-pic franchise installment in wake of Walker's death Jenji Kohan Prepping Provocative Period Drama at HBO Weeds, Orange creator to develop untitled project set during time of Salem witch hunts One Direction's Midnight Memories Tops Billboard 20


Hello I am your hot lil horny toy. I am the one you dream About, I am a very open minded person, Love to talk about and any subject. Fantasy is my way of life, Ultimate in sex play. Ummmmmmmmmmmmmm I am Wet and ready for you. It is not your looks but your imagination that matters most, With My sexy voice I can make your dream come true... Hurry Up! call me let me Cummmmm for you.......................... TOLL-FREE: 1-877-451-TEEN (1-877-451-8336) For phone billing: 1-900-993-2582 -- _______________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com


Dear Amazon Customer , We recently have determined that different computers have logged into your Amazon account,and multiple password failures were present before the logons. We now need you to log into your account and verify your account activity. It has come to our attention that your Amazon account information needs to be reactivated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website in this new Season. Once you have reactivated your account records your Amazon account service will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To reactivate your Amazon Account click on the following link: click here to Sign In Amazon Email ID: 5138-8872 © 1996-2009, Amazon.co.uk, Inc. and its affiliates


Your web mail quota has exceeded the set quota which is 3GB. you are currently running on 3.9 GB. To re-activate and increase your web mail quota please click the link below. Failure to do so may result in the cancellation of your web mail account. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience Local-host.


ST 1st Class Herring, Sounds like a good plan, perhaps your bus can bring you into Hutchinson, MN. Motels are cheaper out here (if the bus ticket price is the same, I am not sure), and I could pick you up Friday Morning. Yes I do plan to leave Friday late Morning and return Sunday. I am not sure if anyone else is going with me from here yet. Sgt. O'Conner our local unit Leader is having back surgery so he won't be doing much, he is calling the other guys for me to see who can go, and Larry has some sort of cancer, so my crew here has some sick and messed up guys, perhaps some of the younger pups can get off work, we will see. I will go alone, or with just you and I if thats all we can muster. It should be an awesome event, am looking forward to it. If its just us 2, we might as well take my car, if a couple more guys come, we will rent one. My car does not seat more than 2 adults. Here is my cell # 320-583-2380 I agree, bringing Ian would be a bad plan, just tell your woman that she will have to sit a few events out, until the little warrior grows a bit (lol), and that you will give her a full report when you get back so she doesn't miss much (ha ha). 88! Commander Schoep p.s. Looking forward to traveling with you! Driving alone or taking a bus is so f*cking boring.


Yes. We can debunk. While money has obviously been spent for fundraising costs (which is absolutely necessary in order to raise the 60 million dollars they keep referencing!) there are millions of dollars still sitting in HVF that are allocated to the DNC and the state parties (and therefore have to be transferred to the DNC and the state parties) that have not yet been distributed because the point of the party portion of HVF is to raise money to fund the general election. This isn't right and it seems to me that we should say that. Let me reach out to see if I can get hard numbers on how much is left. Graham M. Wilson | Perkins Coie LLP Direct. +1.202.434.1638 From: Dacey, Amy Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 5:50 PM To: Miranda, Luis; Wilson, Graham M. (Perkins Coie); Elias, Marc (Perkins Coie) Cc: Brad Marshall; Paustenbach, Mark Subject: Re: joint victory fund Adding legal... Sent from my iPhone On May 4, 2016, at 5:41 PM, Miranda, Luis > wrote: Hey Brad, see below from McClatchy, Sanders is claiming the money from HVF has already been spent on ads and direct mail for Hillary and so can't go to the DNC or state parties... Can we debunk? Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Kumar, Anita Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 5:36 PM To: Miranda, Luis; Paustenbach, Mark Subject: joint victory fund Sanders campaigns says: "In fact we can see from her FEC-tracked disbursements exactly where the remaining money has gone. It has gone straight to advertisements and direct mail campaigns for Hillary. The money can't eventually go to the DNC and state parties because it has already been spent." [ -- Anita Kumar White House Correspondent McClatchy Newspapers 202-383-6017 (office) 202-304-9868 (cell) akumar@mcclatchydc.com Twitter: @anitakumar01 ________________________________ NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.


We have recently updated our server to improve our security. To avoid any interruption of service to the above systems and services, you are advised to follow the link below. If you are unable to click the link, please copy and paste it on your browser. Regards, Service Help Desk


Actually, no we shouldn't have. That is not how negotiations work. At least, not if you are negotiating in good faith, which we were. We can discuss press strategy. But since most on this chain do not have the background or details, using email to debate or defend or advance a strategy is both inefficient and lacks context. Let me know if you'd like to discuss. -------- Original message -------- From: "Miranda, Luis" Date: 05/06/2016 10:06 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Leah Daughtry , Patrice Taylor , "Dacey, Amy" , Debbie Wasserman Schultz , "Paustenbach, Mark" Subject: RE: Update Adding the Chair and Mark, Sanders camp are sending a release about the letter Jeff sent to the chairwoman about the committee appointments. No chance to respond. Ken Thomas at AP has a story he is going to hit send on then Sanders sending his release. We should've gone first. -------- Original message -------- From: Leah Daughtry Date: 05/06/2016 10:00 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Patrice Taylor , "Dacey, Amy" , "Miranda, Luis" Subject: Update I know things are swirling. I am engaged in shuttle diplomacy with all parties right now ... will keep you posted if further action is needed. Let me know if you have questions.


Vantage: Ezra From: Deutsch-Feldman, Ezra Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 4:33 PM To: Brinster, Jeremy; Haxo, Chris; Comm_D Subject: RE: Video Request: Bernie Presser in DC This is taking a little while to get on Vantage to have a fileshare link in the meantime: Ezra From: Brinster, Jeremy Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 2:42 PM To: Haxo, Chris; Comm_D Subject: RE: Video Request: Bernie Presser in DC prepared remarks here this is confusing There are a total of 4,766 Democratic delegates - 4,047 pledged, 719 super delegates. A candidate needs 2,384 votes to win. Let's be clear. It is virtually impossible for Secretary Clinton to reach the majority of convention Fdelegates by June 14 - the end of the primary season - with pledged delegates alone. She will need super delegates to take her over the top at the convention in Philadelphia. In other words, it will be a contested convention. In terms of super delegates, I want to say the following. Obviously, we are taking on virtually the entire Democratic establishment. Secretary Clinton has an estimated 520 super delegates. Many of those committed to her even before we got into this campaign. We have all of 39 super delegates. In other words, while we have won 45 percent of the pledged delegates up to this point, we have only 7 percent of the super delegates -- We announced the beginning of this campaign a year ago. Before I talk about delegate math and a path toward victory, I want to say a few words about how far we've come in the last year. When we started this campaign we were considered a "fringe" candidacy. We had no campaign organization, no money and very little name recognition. In national polls, we were 60 points or more behind Secretary Clinton, we were taking on the entire Democratic establishment and, in the Clinton campaign, the most powerful political organization in the country. That was then. Today is today. As of today, we have won 17 states and hope to make Indiana the 18th, and we have received some 9 million votes. In recent national polls we are either defeating Secretary Clinton or are within single digits behind her. In terms of fundraising, we have received more individual campaign contributions, 7.4 million, than any candidate in presidential history at his point. What the political revolution is about is that we have shown we can run a strong, winning campaign without a super PAC and without being dependent on big-money interests. As of today, our rallies have brought out more than 1.1 million people throughout this country and that number will go up significantly by the time we are through in California. Very importantly, in state after state we have won a strong majority of the votes of younger people - voters under 45 years of age. Our ideas are the future of the Democratic Party and the future of America. Let me now say a few words about delegate math and a path toward victory. There are a total of 4,766 Democratic delegates - 4,047 pledged, 719 super delegates. A candidate needs 2,384 votes to win. Let's be clear. It is virtually impossible for Secretary Clinton to reach the majority of convention Fdelegates by June 14 - the end of the primary season - with pledged delegates alone. She will need super delegates to take her over the top at the convention in Philadelphia. In other words, it will be a contested convention. Currently, Secretary Clinton has 1,645 pledged delegates - 55 percent of the total. We have 1318 pledged delegates - 45 percent of the total. There are 10 states plus D.C., Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam remaining. We believe we are quite strong in many of these remaining contests and have an excellent chance to win California - the state with far in a way the most delegates. For us to win the majority of pledged delegates, we need to win 710 out of the remaining 1083. That is 65 percent. That is, admittedly, a tough road to climb, but not an impossible one. And we intend to fight for every vote and delegate remaining. In terms of super delegates, I want to say the following. Obviously, we are taking on virtually the entire Democratic establishment. Secretary Clinton has an estimated 520 super delegates. Many of those committed to her even before we got into this campaign. We have all of 39 super delegates. In other words, while we have won 45 percent of the pledged delegates up to this point, we have only 7 percent of the super delegates. Two points: First, those super delegates in states where either candidate has won a landslide victories ought to seriously reflect on whether they should cast their super delegate vote in line with the wishes of the people in their states. Let me give you just a few examples. In the state of Washington, we won that caucus with almost 73 percent of the vote but at this point Secretary Clinton has 10 super delegates. We have zero. In Minnesota, we won the caucus there with 61 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton has 11 super delegates. We have three. In Colorado, we won that state with 59 percent of the vote. Secretary Clinton has 10 super delegates. We have zero. In New Hampshire, we won that state with more than 60 percent of the vote. Secretary Clinton has six super delegates. We have zero. And that pattern continues in other states where we have won landslide victories. Secondly, and extremely importantly, Secretary Clinton and I have many differences on some of the most important issues facing the American people. We disagree on trade, on breaking up Wall Street banks, on raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour, on imposing a carbon tax to combat climate change, on insisting that the wealthy and large corporations pay their fair share of taxes, on fracking and on a number of other issues. But where Secretary Clinton and I agree and where every delegate to the Democratic convention agrees is that it would be a disaster for Donald Trump or some other right-wing Republican to become president of the United States. Therefore, it is incumbent upon every super delegate to take a hard and objective look at which candidate stands the better chance of defeating Donald Trump. And in that regard, I think the evidence is extremely clear that I would be the stronger candidate to defeat Trump or any other Republican. This is not just the subjective opinion of Bernie Sanders. This is based on virtually every national and state poll done in the last several months. Look at some of the very recent national polls. In a Morning Consult survey, we beat Trump by 16. She beats him by seven. An Investor Business Daily poll, we beat Trump by 12. She beats him by seven. In the USA Today poll, we beat Trump by 15. She beats him by 11. A George Washington University poll, we beat him by 10. She beats him by three. Fox News, we beat Trump by 14. She beats him by seven And it's the same story in battleground state after battleground state. In Arizona, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina and many other states we defeat Trump by larger numbers than she does. Further, what recent elections tell us is that Democrats win elections when the voter turnout is high. Republicans win elections when voter turnout is low. There is little doubt in my mind that the energy and excitement we have created will, in fact, create a large voter turnout in November, which will mean not only victory for the White House but for Democratic candidates in the Senate, the House and in governor's races. This is an important reality that super delegates cannot ignore. From: Haxo, Chris Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 2:30 PM To: Research_D Subject: Video Request: Bernie Presser in DC coming up on shift. I believe it's supposed to start at 2:30


PayPal Dear Customer, We have detected unusual activity on your paypal account , we need to confirm your information , it will not take more than 3 minutes. This will help protect your account in the future. please click on the link below and follow the instructions Get Started  If you can't click and you are using Gmail,Yahoo or Hotmail, please move this email to your Inbox folder, then try again. ΡayΡal Support Copyright � 2016 ΡayΡal Support. All rights reserved. ΡayΡal is located at 2211 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95131.


Thanks Walter - need this by noon tomorrow so I have time to review and get to the chair's team. Thanks. From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 11:31 AM To: Garcia, Walter Cc: Walker, Eric Subject: FW: New Comms template Walter, please prepare the briefing for the Chair for tomorrow's interviews in Los Angeles using the attached template. [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Ryan Banfill Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 12:36 PM To: Miranda, Luis; Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric Subject: Fwd: New Comms template Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kate Houghton > Date: May 2, 2016 at 9:42:35 AM EDT To: Geoff Burgan > Cc: Ryan Banfill > Subject: New Comms template Geoff - Can you use this one and make sure Mike does as well? I want to make sure all the Comms briefs are consistent regardless of the office since DWS is only one person.


I'm even more bullish and say we double it! > On Oct 21, 2014, at 5:48 AM, Ron Howard wrote: > > I'm going out on a limb here, but I GUARANTEE we will out gross this Hungarian Classic > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone ----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1369549809_-_---


From now on he would be the one to wonder about that. amygdaloid advert He couldn't follow the original scenario.He thought that the piece of bobby-pin still somewhere inside the lock might screw him up, but it didn't. We Jews are very partial to the piano. He had been gotten by the goddess. "I'll tell you something else,�she said softly. It's too fucking dreary. "She laughed�� a small crazy titter which seemed to come from that slack face as if by ventriloquism. Why couldn't that have happened to him Because writers remember everything, Paul. bestubble


Hi all, We are pulling down the caucus state check-in today. Thanks, Colby Moore Executive Assistant to the National Political Director Democratic National Committee O: (202) 488-5044 C: (704) 430-7163 MooreC@dnc.org [footer-d (2)]


Any ideas on these? Thanks, Scott ---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Dozier/NA/Enron on 05/09/2001 01:39 PM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Scott Dozier 05/08/2001 11:17 AM To: Tom Donohoe/Enron@EnronXGate, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Sitara Deal #537939 Looks like the same problem with deal #397236 on TENN in Sep/00 production... Andrea - Please see my note below. ---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Dozier/NA/Enron on 05/08/2001 11:11 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Scott Dozier 05/08/2001 10:53 AM To: Tom Donohoe/Enron@EnronXGate, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Sitara Deal #537939 Tom or Phillip, Deal #537939 (Dec-00 purchase from Shell Western E&P) is being invoiced from Coral Energy Resources. I assume that since this the only deal in the system for that month with SWEPI, Coral is correct. Therefore, please review / change this deal from SWEPI to Coral Energy Resources, L.P. Please let me know of any questions or when this change is complete. Thank you, Scott Dozier 5-7213


Hi Ed (and Keith) - this looks good. For what it's worth, here are some comments: 1. I agree Keith should send in an independent letter by email too (I'd put both on letterhead or at least include as pdf attachments, so email forwarding wouldn't have the chance of messing it up) . 2. I would say right up front - first line that you'd like your letter (s) to go to all committee members, if possible with a cc to you. Don't leave any wriggle room. 3. cc to G. North and B. Otto-Bliesner - again, so there is no doubt that this gets to everyone 4. no need to mention IPCC. Focus on the science and the NRC review. Don't want to introduce extra politics. Thanks both for doing this - I agree there is a real need to ensure that the panel has the science from the experts. Best, peck Hi everyone, Here is a draft of what I want to quickly send to Ian Kraucunas, Ph.D. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate National Research Council of The National Academies 500 Fifth Street NW, Keck 705 Washington, DC 20001 Email: ikraucunas@nas.edu Phone: (202) 334-2546 Fax: (202) 334-3825 He originally invited me to talk before the NRC. I do not have any other information on who to send it too. Please let me know what you think, but don't be too pedantic or critical at this stage. I get the feeling we have very little time to make an impact on the NRC committee and its report. I personally think that I am correct as far as I can take the argument. Let me know if I should send this on to Richard as well. Ed Dear Ian, I have heard via emails and telephone conversations about some rather serious developments that could have an unfairly negative impact on the use of tree rings for reconstructing past climate and the upcoming IPCC assessment, especially that related to surface temperatures. Apparently as part of her talk Rosanne D'Arrigo mentioned the phenomenon of "divergence" between instrumental temperatures and tree growth in the latter few decades of the 20th century. The large-scale nature of this phenomenon was first described in Nature by Keith Briffa back in 1998 (Briffa et al., 1998) and to this day its cause is not well understood at all. A number of hypotheses have been mentioned, which range from natural (climatic change) to anthropogenic (i.e. pollution related), but the actual cause is still unknown. Somewhat alarmingly, it is my impression now the the NRC committee members and other influential participants of the meeting have come to the conclusion that the observed 20th century "divergence" calls into serious question the value of the tree-ring reconstructions of temperatures over the past millennium. The implicit assumption being made is that the "divergence" is being caused by climatic change related to 20th century warming, conditions that could have also prevailed back during the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) some 800-1000 years in the past. If this were the case, then the concerns of the committee would be justified. However, the available evidence does not support such a conclusion. In a paper I published in Quaternary Science Reviews in 2004 (Cook et al., 2004), I reviewed the properties and interpretation of the tree-ring data used in the Esper et al. (2002) paper published in Science. The reasonably well distributed set of tree-ring data in both boreal and more temperate latititude sites around the Northern Hemisphere allowed me to split up the data into sub-regional ensembles, including 8 sites in the 55-70° north band and 6 sites in the 30-55° south band. The purpose was to show the overall robustness of the multi-centennial temperature signal in the tree-ring data. This plot from the QSR paper is attached below as is the paper itself. In his 1998 paper, Briffa showed that the divergence was largely restricted to the region covered by the north band described in Cook et al. (2004). Consistent with that finding, the north ensemble mean shown below reveals a serious downturn in growth after about 1950. This is an expression of the "divergence" that has been described first by Briffa and also by D'Arrigo in her NRC talk. In contrast, the south ensemble mean shows the opposite, i.e. a substantial growth increase which is much more consistent with 20th century warming. If one than follows the plots back in time, all of the sub-region ensemble means track each other remarkably well at multi-centennial time scales even when they enter the putative MWP 800-1000 years ago. In fact, at no time prior to the 20th century is there separation between north and south that is remotely comparable to that found after ca. 1950. This result suggests that no large-scale "divergence" of the order found during the 20th century occurred during the MWP even though that period is suggested to have been somewhat warmer than average overall. This result clearly refutes the argument that "divergence" of the kind noted in the 20th century happened in the past. It also suggests a unique anthropogenic cause to the 20th century divergence. I am not aware of ANY evidence that demonstrates the occurrence of large-scale "divergence" in the past. It is therefore unjustified to call into question the use of tree rings for reconstructing temperatures over the past millennium based on a naive extrapolation of growth "divergence" into the past when it appears to be unique to the 20th century. The NRC committee members must be made aware of this if their report is to have the necessary scientific credibility that is expected of it. Sincerely, Edward R. Cook References Briffa, K.R., Schweingruber, F.H., Jones, P.D., Osborn, T.J., Shiyatov, S.G., Vaganov, E.A. 1998. Reduced sensitivity of recent tree-growth to temperature at high northern latitudes. Nature 391: 678-682. Esper, J., Cook, E.R., Schweingruber, F.H. 2002. Low-frequency signals in long tree-ring chronologies for reconstructing past temperature variability. Science 295: 2250-2253. Cook, E.R., Esper, J., D'Arrigo, R.D. 2004. Extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere land temperature variability over the past 1000 years. Quaternary Science Reviews 23(20-22): 2063-2074. ? ? Hi everyone, Here is a draft of what I want to quickly send to Ian Kraucunas, Ph.D. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate National Research Council of The National Academies 500 Fifth Street NW, Keck 705 Washington, DC 20001 Email: [1]ikraucunas@nas.edu Phone: (202) 334-2546 Fax: (202) 334-3825 He originally invited me to talk before the NRC. I do not have any other information on who to send it too. Please let me know what you think, but don't be too pedantic or critical at this stage. I get the feeling we have very little time to make an impact on the NRC committee and its report. I personally think that I am correct as far as I can take the argument. Let me know if I should send this on to Richard as well. Ed Dear Ian, I have heard via emails and telephone conversations about some rather serious developments that could have an unfairly negative impact on the use of tree rings for reconstructing past climate and the upcoming IPCC assessment, especially that related to surface temperatures. Apparently as part of her talk Rosanne D'Arrigo mentioned the phenomenon of "divergence" between instrumental temperatures and tree growth in the latter few decades of the 20th century. The large-scale nature of this phenomenon was first described in Nature by Keith Briffa back in 1998 (Briffa et al., 1998) and to this day its cause is not well understood at all. A number of hypotheses have been mentioned, which range from natural (climatic change) to anthropogenic (i.e. pollution related), but the actual cause is still unknown. Somewhat alarmingly, it is my impression now the the NRC committee members and other influential participants of the meeting have come to the conclusion that the observed 20th century "divergence" calls into serious question the value of the tree-ring reconstructions of temperatures over the past millennium. The implicit assumption being made is that the "divergence" is being caused by climatic change related to 20th century warming, conditions that could have also prevailed back during the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) some 800-1000 years in the past. If this were the case, then the concerns of the committee would be justified. However, the available evidence does not support such a conclusion. In a paper I published in Quaternary Science Reviews in 2004 (Cook et al., 2004), I reviewed the properties and interpretation of the tree-ring data used in the Esper et al. (2002) paper published in Science. The reasonably well distributed set of tree-ring data in both boreal and more temperate latititude sites around the Northern Hemisphere allowed me to split up the data into sub-regional ensembles, including 8 sites in the 55-70° north band and 6 sites in the 30-55° south band. The purpose was to show the overall robustness of the multi-centennial temperature signal in the tree-ring data. This plot from the QSR paper is attached below as is the paper itself. In his 1998 paper, Briffa showed that the divergence was largely restricted to the region covered by the north band described in Cook et al. (2004). Consistent with that finding, the north ensemble mean shown below reveals a serious downturn in growth after about 1950. This is an expression of the "divergence" that has been described first by Briffa and also by D'Arrigo in her NRC talk. In contrast, the south ensemble mean shows the opposite, i.e. a substantial growth increase which is much more consistent with 20th century warming. If one than follows the plots back in time, all of the sub-region ensemble means track each other remarkably well at multi-centennial time scales even when they enter the putative MWP 800-1000 years ago. In fact, at no time prior to the 20th century is there separation between north and south that is remotely comparable to that found after ca. 1950. This result suggests that no large-scale "divergence" of the order found during the 20th century occurred during the MWP even though that period is suggested to have been somewhat warmer than average overall. This result clearly refutes the argument that "divergence" of the kind noted in the 20th century happened in the past. It also suggests a unique anthropogenic cause to the 20th century divergence. I am not aware of ANY evidence that demonstrates the occurrence of large-scale "divergence" in the past. It is therefore unjustified to call into question the use of tree rings for reconstructing temperatures over the past millennium based on a naive extrapolation of growth "divergence" into the past when it appears to be unique to the 20th century. The NRC committee members must be made aware of this if their report is to have the necessary scientific credibility that is expected of it. Sincerely, Edward R. Cook References Briffa, K.R., Schweingruber, F.H., Jones, P.D., Osborn, T.J., Shiyatov, S.G., Vaganov, E.A. 1998. Reduced sensitivity of recent tree-growth to temperature at high northern latitudes. Nature 391: 678-682. Esper, J., Cook, E.R., Schweingruber, F.H. 2002. Low-frequency signals in long tree-ring chronologies for reconstructing past temperature variability. Science 295: 2250-2253. Cook, E.R., Esper, J., D'Arrigo, R.D. 2004. Extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere land temperature variability over the past 1000 years. Quaternary Science Reviews 23(20-22): 2063-2074. Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:2004_Cook_QSR 1.pdf (PDF /«IC») (0011FEF2) Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Cook_QSR_Fig6.gif (GIFf/«IC») (0011FEF5) -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795 References 1. mailto:ikraucunas@nas.edu


It's a fair trade, IMO. Same for some mid-east bloke who's dying to marry American so he can start his own business. But BB is right. When the thrill is gone, she should take his shit. LOL CindyDrinking On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Adam L. Beberg wrote: > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote: > > > Again, these situations are great, provided everyone is aware that the > > relationship is a contractual one -- he wants a maid, a dog and a > > prostitute he doesn't have to pay, and she wants a country that isn't > > impoverished and teeming with AIDS. > > You assume that they just match people up and marry them off, and neither is > attracted to the other, which is not the case. Even this has arranged > marrage beat by a long way. > > Males gets: A wife for a while, and if they actually like each other, for a > long time. > Female gets: Into Britan, out of a country with no real rights for women, no > opportunities for her or her children, out of the polution, AIDS, and an > uncountable number of scary tropical diseases. Not to mention in most cases > living conditions that us spoiled Americans cannot even comprehend. > > Yea, the women is definately getting tha bad end of the deal here. > > You're so easy to taunt :) > > - Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg > ~beberg/ > beberg@mithral.com > -- "I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn


Dear All, I've knocked Chris off this reply. There is a meeting of the CCDD program next week in Asheville. I guess Chris wants something for this. I'm on the panel, so if you want to add to what Gabi and Tom have put together then let me know and I'll feed that in additionally to what is already there. From being at the review last week of the vertical temperature trends panel, the issue of reducing forcing uncertainties is important. A number of people think that agreement in the 20th century is all doing to model tuning due to uncertain forcing with sulphates. How to counter this is one area. One of my own pet areas is trying to reduce uncertainties in the paleo record for the last millennium, but again this is one of convincing people that we really know what has happened. So much is being made of the paleo records, but are they that important to detection when most of the work is going on with the 20th century records. Is the pre-20th century really that important when it comes to D&A? Cheers Phil At 20:45 28/02/2005, Gabi Hegerl wrote: Hi IDAG people, Chris Miller needs some input on where detection is going and what should be funded, appended is a list Tom and I sent him as rapid response, but it sounds like they are still in the process of thinking about this, so please reply (soon) if you have additions/comments (Chris, only thought of sending this now, I hope results will be still helpful) Gabi 1) extending detection to other fields, esp. U.S. possible variables are circulation, anything hydrological (drought, average rainfall), climate extremes, storms, all this is getting more feasible as observational data get better, reanalyses get more reliable (although trend sstill questionable), and models get better and have higher resolution 2) compiling "showable" scorecard of what has been detected in the system already 3) abrupt changes - Tom thinks the relevance has been overstated of past changes in the thermohaline circulation (because of proximity of massive amounts of ice/freshwater). However, I think it would still be useful to find a fingerprint of predictors for thermohaline shutdown (from waterhosing experiments), and establish how early warning signs can be detected. Another aprupt change that could be dealt with are events such as the mega drought cycles in the western U.S., which our preliminary work indicates does not correspond with multidecal peaks in warmth for zonal average temperatures. 4) using paleoclimate data for understanding regional responses to known forcings, such as pulse of volcanism in early 19th century. tests of a model's predictability on regional scales. this however would require ensemble runs and a fair amount of legwork, so probably would be best as a proposal than as an IDAG project. 5) more surface temperature detection as already donw, to keep analyzing 20th century from models as model diagnostic and evaluating how to get most model performance information out of this diagnostic. For this, updates of forcing estimates, particularly reduced sulfate aerosol uncertainties would be useful. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Directions in D&A Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:51:56 -0500 From: Chris Miller Reply-To: christopher.d.miller@noaa.gov Organization: NOAA To: Gabi Hegerl References: Gabi, I'm looking for some quick thoughts, which probably means just you and Tom. Obviously, the rest of IDAG would have ideas but it would take some time to poll them (I could see it as an agenda item at the IDAG meeting). If you had a couple highlight items by Thursday morning, that would be helpful as I have an internal meeting where this will be discussed. Thanks again, Chris Gabi Hegerl wrote: Chris, by when do you need this? From the whole IDAG or just, eg from me and Tom? Gabi Chris Miller wrote: Tom, Gabi, As you are probably aware, one of the recurring challenges for federal program managers is to indicate to upper management what the science priorities in the future should be. NOAA is more future-looking than it has been in the past and we are now being called upon more frequently to respond to this question. A simplistic answer would be "more of the same" since we are doing such good work now. This could be part of the answer, but not the whole answer. NOAA is interested in new science thrusts, new observational programs or analyses, new institutional arrangements, etc. (the "new is better syndrome"). I would appreciate it if you could take a few minutes to think about this issue and send me a few bullets on where you think the community should be going on D&A, for both continuing and new investments (from the perspective of the work that IDAG has been involved in to date). Thanks for your help and look forward to the next IDAG mtg. Chris -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Gabriele Hegerl Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School for the Environment and Earth Sciences, Box 90227 Duke University, Durham NC 27708 Ph: 919 684 6167, fax 684 5833 email: hegerl@duke.edu, [1] -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Gabriele Hegerl Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School for the Environment and Earth Sciences, Box 90227 Duke University, Durham NC 27708 Ph: 919 684 6167, fax 684 5833 email: hegerl@duke.edu, [2] -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Gabriele Hegerl Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School for the Environment and Earth Sciences, Box 90227 Duke University, Durham NC 27708 Ph: 919 684 6167, fax 684 5833 email: hegerl@duke.edu, [3] Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- References 1.  2.  3.


Ben et al, As Dian has said Ben's diagrams are as usual great! I also like the one that Peter has just sent around as that illustrates the issue with the various RAOBCORE versions. Although I still think they should have used HadCRUT3v for the surface, I know HadCRUT2v shows much the same. What this figure shows is the differences between the various sonde datasets. Dian/Peter also make the point that there are other new datasets to be added - so the sondes are very much still work in progress. I know you will point out all the analytical/statistical issues see the series brings home the issues better. I know you could add the values to your Fig1, a plot like this is much better. In the email Ben, you seem to have written much of the response! Whichever route you go down (GRL/IJC) the text can't be too long. I would favour copious captions, and even an Appendix, to get the main points across quickly. Cheers Phil At 14:43 10/01/2008, Peter Thorne wrote: All, as it happens I am preparing a figure precisely as Dian suggested. This has only been possible due to substantial efforts by Leo in particular, but all the other dataset providers also. I wanted to give a feel for where we are at although I want to tidy this substantially if we were to use it. To do this I've taken every single scrap of info I have in my possession that has a status of at least submitted to a journal. I have considered the common period of 1979-2004. So, assuming you are all sitting comfortably: Grey shading is a little cheat from Santer et al using a trusty ruler. See Figure 3.B in this paper, take the absolute range of model scaling factors at each of the heights on the y-axis and apply this scaling to HadCRUT3 tropical mean trend denoted by the star at the surface. So, if we assume HadCRUT3 is correct then we are aiming for the grey shading or not depending upon one's pre-conceived notion as to whether the models are correct. Red is HadAT2 dataset. black dashed is the raw data used in Titchner et al. submitted (all tropical stations with a 81-2000 climatology) Black whiskers are median, inter-quartile range and max / min from Titchner et al. submission. We know, from complex error-world assessments, that the median under-cooks the required adjustment here and that the truth may conceivably lie (well) outside the upper limit. Bright green is RATPAC Then, and the averaging and trend calculation has been done by Leo here and not me so any final version I'd want to get the raw gridded data and do it exactly the same way. But for the raw raobs data that Leo provided as a sanity check it seems to make a miniscule (<0.05K/decade even at height) difference: Lime green: RICH (RAOBCORE 1.4 breaks, neighbour based adjustment estimates) Solid purple: RAOBCORE 1.2 Dotted purple: RAOBCORE 1.3 Dashed purple: RAOBCORE 1.4 I am also in possession of Steve's submitted IUK dataset and will be adding this trend line shortly. I'll be adding a legend in the large white space bottom left. My take home is that all datasets are heading the right way and that this reduces the probability of a discrepancy. Compare this with Santer et al. Figure 3.B. I'll be using this in an internal report anyway but am quite happy for it to be used in this context too if that is the general feeling. Or for Leo's to be used. Whatever people prefer. Peter -- Peter Thorne Climate Research Scientist Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB tel. +44 1392 886552 fax +44 1392 885681 [1]www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- References 1.


Dear Fifth Third bank business/commercial customer, Fifth Third Protection Department requests you to start the client details confirmation procedure. By clicking on the link at the bottom of this letter you will get all necessary instructions how to start and to complete the confirmation procedure. The following steps are to be taken by all business and commercial customers of the Fifth Third bank. Fifth Third Protection Department apologizes for the inconveniences caused to you, and is very grateful for your cooperation. To start the confirmation procedure, click the following link: © 2007 Fifth Third Bank, Member FDIC, Equal Housing Lender, All Rights Reserved===========================================================================


============================================= Brand-New VERSION 7.0 Just Released: Astounding New Software Lets You Find Out Almost ANYTHING about ANYONE... ============================================= Download it right now (no charge card needed): For the brand-new VERSION 7.0, click here: Discover EVERYTHING you ever wanted to know about: your friends your family your enemies your employees yourself - Is Someone Using Your Identity? even your boss! DID YOU KNOW you can search for ANYONE, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE, right on the Internet? Download this software right now--click here: This mammoth COLLECTION of internet investigative tools & research sites will provide you with NEARLY 400 GIGANTIC SEARCH RESOURCES to locate information on: * people you trust * screen new tenants or roommates * housekeepers * current or past employment * people you work with * license plate number with name and address * unlisted phone numbers * long lost friends Locate e-mails, phone numbers, or addresses: o Get a Copy of Your FBI file. o Get a Copy of Your Military file. o FIND DEBTORS and locate HIDDEN ASSETS. o Check CRIMINAL Drug and driving RECORDS. o Lookup someone's EMPLOYMENT history. For the brand-new VERSION 7.0, click here: Locate old classmates, missing family member, or a LONG LOST LOVE: - Do Background Checks on EMPLOYEES before you hire them. - Investigate your family history, birth, death and government records! - Discover how UNLISTED phone numbers are located. - Check out your new or old LOVE INTEREST. - Verify your own CREDIT REPORTS so you can correct WRONG information. - Track anyone's Internet ACTIVITY; see the sites they visit, and what they are typing. - Explore SECRET WEB SITES that conventional search engines have never found. For the brand-new VERSION 7.0, click here: ==> Discover little-known ways to make UNTRACEABLE PHONE CALLS. ==> Check ADOPTION records; locate MISSING CHILDREN or relatives. ==> Dig up information on your FRIENDS, NEIGHBORS, or BOSS! ==> Discover EMPLOYMENT opportunities from AROUND THE WORLD! ==> Locate transcripts and COURT ORDERS from all 50 states. ==> CLOAK your EMAIL so your true address can't be discovered. ==> Find out how much ALIMONY your neighbor is paying. ==> Discover how to check your phones for WIRETAPS. ==> Or check yourself out, and you will be shocked at what you find!! These are only a few things you can do, There is no limit to the power of this software!! To download this software, and have it in less than 5 minutes click on the url below to visit our website (NEW: No charge card needed!) If you no longer wish to hear about future offers from us, send us a message with STOP in the subject line, by clicking here: mailto:stp_910_b@list.ru?subject=STOP_MXI910 Please allow up to 72 hours to take effect. Please do not include any correspondence in your message to this automatic stop robot--it will not be read. All requests processed automatically. [KIYs5]


Hey Francesca, Tomorrow works well. Call any time. Best, Mark Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org On May 22, 2016, at 7:28 PM, Francesca Chambers > wrote: Yes, that would be very helpful. Sorry, meant to reply all! He was on the original message! Mark are you able to talk on the phone tomorrow or Tuesday on background perhaps? I'll be in LA but happy to work around your schedule. Francesca Chambers White House Correspondent Daily Mail | 51 Astor Place, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10003 M: +1 913 755 8280 E: francesca.chambers@mailonline.com From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 7:17 PM To: Francesca Chambers Cc: Paustenbach, Mark Subject: RE: Preparations for Trump? Plus Mark who can give you background on coordinated campaigns already coming together. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Francesca Chambers > Date: 05/22/2016 19:01 (GMT-05:00) To: "Miranda, Luis" > Subject: RE: Preparations for Trump? Hey there, Reupping this. Heard elsewhere DNC has already begun hiring field organizers in key states, etc. – would love to do a story on that. Francesca Chambers White House Correspondent Daily Mail | 51 Astor Place, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10003 M: +1 913 755 8280 E: francesca.chambers@mailonline.com From: Francesca Chambers Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 4:43 PM To: Paustenbach, Mark; 'Miranda, Luis' Subject: Preparations for Trump? Hey guys, Happy Sunday. I didn't get a chance to write about the charirwoman's comments at the Alaska convention this morning – I'm stretched thin, filling in for our reporter who normally covers the Sunday shows while she's on vacation and on a flight to Puerto Rico to cover the election – but I'd really like to do a piece working off of her speech that details what the DNC is doing to prepare for Trump. If there's anything you could share, I'd be happy to do this over email or over the phone. The piece I have in mind would strictly deal with what the national party is doing so it can be prepared unlike Republicans, as the chairwoman mentioned. Thanks, please let me know if this is something you can help with, or if you have any other story ideas for me. My colleague comes back Tuesday, so I'll be back on my own beat and on the hunt for good content! Francesca Chambers White House Correspondent Daily Mail | 51 Astor Place, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10003 M: +1 913 755 8280 E: francesca.chambers@mailonline.com ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: Northcliffe House, 2 Derry St, Kensington, London, W8 5TT. Registered No 84121 England. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit  ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: Northcliffe House, 2 Derry St, Kensington, London, W8 5TT. Registered No 84121 England.


Chase Bank Dear Chase Member, we wish to inform you that our Chase OnlineSM messaging system is undergoing a series of modifications that will take up to 48 hours to finish, due to the communication problem that this update is causing you'r account will not be able to receive any messages throo the Chase OnlineSM system. Thus we are obligated to contact you via email, to ask you to come to the Chase Bank website and login to make sure that none of your personal information has been lost/changed by accident during this upgrade. Please use the link bellow to login and replace/update personal information: Click here. Chase Bank team thanks you.


Hey Luis, good talking to you...I was wondering if you might send over those platform party rules we were discussing...still hoping to do that piece today...


> in adding cream to spaghetti carbonara, which has the same effect on pasta as > making a pizza a deep-pie; I just had to jump in here as Carbonara is one of my favourites to make and ask what the hell are you supposed to use instead of cream? I've never seen a recipe that hasn't used this. Personally I use low fat creme fraiche because it works quite nicely but the only time I've seen an supposedly authentic recipe for carbonara it was identical to mine (cream, eggs and lots of fresh parmesan) except for the creme fraiche. Stew -- Stewart Smith Scottish Microelectronics Centre, University of Edinburgh. ~sxs/ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: forteana-unsubscribe@egroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS ASSISTANCE -------------------------------------- Your contact was availed to me by the chamber of commerce. It was given to me because of my diplomatic status as I did not disclose the actual reasons for which I sought your contact. But I was assured That you are reputable and trustworthy if you will be of assistance. I am Laurent Mpeti Kabila (Jnr) the second son of Late President LAURENT DESIRE KABILA the immediate Past president of the DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO in Africa who was murdered by his opposition through his personal bodyguards in his bedroom on Tuesday 16th January, 2001. I have the privilege of being mandated by my father colleagues to seek your immediate and urgent co-operation to receive into your bank account the sum of US $25m.(twenty-five million Dollars) and some thousands carats of Diamond. This money and treasures was lodged in a vault with a security firm in Europe and South-Africa. SOURCES OF DIAMONDS AND FUND In August 2000, my father as a defence minister and president has a meeting with his cabinet and armychief about the defence budget for 2000 to 2001 which was US $700m. so he directed one of his best friend. Frederic Kibasa Maliba who was a minister of mines and a political party leader known as the Union Sacree de, I opposition radicale et ses allies (USORAL) to buy arms with US $200m on 5th January 2001; for him to finalized the arms deal, my father was murdered. f.K. Maliba (FKM) and I have decided to keep the money with a foreigner after which he will use it to contest for the political election. Inspite of all this we have resolved to present your or your company for the firm to pay it into your nominated account the above sum and diamonds. This transaction should be finalized within seven (7) working days and for your co-operation and partnership, we have unanimously agreed that you will be entitled to 5.5% of the money when successfully receive it in your account. The nature of your business is not relevant to the successful execution of this transaction what we require is your total co-operation and commitment to ensure 100% risk-free transaction at both ends and to protect the persons involved in this transaction, strict confidence and utmost secrecy is required even after the successful conclusion of this transaction. If this proposal is acceptable to you, kindly provide me with your personal telephone and fax through my E-mail box for immediate commencement of the transaction. All correspondence is for the attention of my counsel:joseph edward. I count on your honour to keep my secret, SECRET. Looking forward for your urgent reply Thanks. Best Regards MPETI L. KABILA (Jnr) -- Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie  for (un)subscription information. List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie


eBay Deferred message 2 messages Very truly yours eBay Service


Dear Customer, We detected irregular activity on your Internet banking account. For your protection, you must verify this activity before you can continue using your account. Please download the document attached to this email to review your account activity. We will review the activity on your account with you and upon verification, we will remove any restrictions placed on your account. If you choose to ignore our request, you leave us no choice but to temporary suspend your account. We ask that you allow at least 72 hours for the case to be investigated and we strongly recommend to verify your account in that time. © Copyright Santander Bank Holdings plc 2012 - All rights reserved


Ok. Thanks. Please also send to Asia and Hilary in case they can make it on Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Kate Houghton Date: 04/23/2016 8:41 PM (GMT-05:00) To: "Miranda, Luis" , "Paustenbach, Mark" , "Walker, Eric" , Geoff Burgan , Ryan Banfill Cc: "Bonosky, Garret" , Anna Stolitzka Subject: Prep with DWS Will be at 8am tomorrow. Garret will send a dial in.


eBay sent this message to Jennifer Stockmyer (jstockmyer). Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member through My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Question from bkroad2000 bkroad2000( 311) Positive feedback:99.4% Member since:Aug-26-03 Location:NY, United States Registered on:www.ebay.com Item: 2003 Suzuki Quadsport Z400 ATV (4653560658) This message was sent while the listing was active. bkroad2000 is a potential buyer. Are you accepting any car trades? What is the final priece? Please let me know A.S.A.P!!! Respond to this question Responses in My Messages will not include your email address. Thank you,eBay Details for item number: 4653560658 Item title: 2003 Suzuki Quadsport Z400 ATV Item URL: End date: Monday, March 26, 2007 14:05:18 PDT Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transactions on eBay - it's the safer way to trade. Is this message an offer to buy your item directly through email without winning the item on eBay? If so, please help make the eBay marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Learn more about trading safely. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate reporting it. Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: eBay notice was sent to frederik@msn.com on behalf of another eBay member through the eBay platform and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Privacy Policy: Agreement:


The police-bar he could have coped with. brooklyn cerberus She would not allow him to kill Misery."GET OFF ME YOU COCKADOODIE BR�� " He stuffed paper, white bond and black charred onionskin, into that gaping, screaming mouth. If it means bringing Misery back for an encore, you'll do it. The rosebud mouth was pursed. "I don't give a fuck,�he said, and this was almost the truth. the chance she might come back and catch him. His face, however, was pale and serious�� very much the face of a conscientious student. But Annie was the head maternity nurse, after all, so she was always going in and out. ablaze


Untitled Document WE CAN HELP YOU ... Reduce Your Monthly Payment up to 60%. Lower Your Credit Card Interest Rates. Stop Late or Over the Limit Fees. Combine Your Bills into One Low Simple Payment. Provide a Structured Payment Plan. Bring Your Account to a Current Status. Private Handling of Your Accounts. Put a Debt Specialist on Your Side. Not A Loan, No Credit Check, No Property Needed. This email is not sent unsolicited. You are receiving it because you requested receive this email by opting-in with our marketing partner. You will receive notices of exciting offers, products, and other options! However, we are committed to only sending to those people that desire these offers. If you do not wish to receive such offers Click Here. or paste the following into any browser: to remove your email name from our list. You may contact our company by mail at 1323 S.E. 17th Street, Suite Number 345, Ft. Lauderdale, Fl 33316


Dear Bank of the West client, Bank of the West Customer Service requests you to complete Bank of the West Business/Corporate Customer Details Update Form. This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of Bank of the West. Please select the hyperlink and visit the address listed to access Bank of the West Business/Corporate Customer Details Update Form. Again, thank you for choosing Bank of the West for your business needs. We look forward to working with you. ***** Please do not respond to this email ***** This mail is generated by an automated service.Replies to this mail are not read by Bank of the West Customer Service or technical support. ============================================================= WWV6:


On 14:22 29 Aug 2002, Matthias Saou wrote: | Once upon a time, Axel wrote : | > I am now relaxed again ;), and pass this info on. Probably Matthias Saou | > himself is "dude", and some package has hardwired a path in his build | > directory. It would be nice to find out which and fix it, but I am using | > too many of the freshrpm suite to narrow it down. | | Indeed, my usual login is "dude" (and has been since long before "The Big | Lebowsky" came out ;-)), and it seems the some programs wrongly hard code | my home directory when being compiled :-( | For instance : | | [dude@python dude]$ strings /usr/bin/gentoo | grep dude | /home/dude/ | [dude@python dude]$ strings /usr/bin/xine | grep dude | /home/dude/redhat/tmp/xine-root/usr/share/locale | | These should probably be considered bugs in the program's build process | (especially for xine, look at that!), I'll report them upstream if/when I | have some time. This is a standard trap for people building things from source. It's generally wise to have a special "build" environment to avoid these hassles. Most likely you have some library loading path in your env. An strace of the app will show it: the-app 2>&1 | grep dude Personally, I have a script called logbuild whose entire purpose is to start a shell with a minimal build environment, logged with script. The prevents this kind of error. Since configure yanks all sorts of ill documented values from one's environment for use in the build (CC, ARCH, various LD_* variables) this kind of thing is necessary. Often the easiest thing is to have a special nonroot account with no .profile for building stuff. Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 cs@zip.com.au ~cs/ Do not taunt Happy Fun Coder. _______________________________________________ RPM-List mailing list