By Jeremy Herb | 05/11/2016 08:30 AM EDT With Louis Nelson, Austin Wright, Connor O'Brien and Ellen Mitchell DRIVING THE DAY - CONGRESS NEGOTIATES DEFENSE BILLS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: The Senate Armed Services Committee and House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee take their debates of the annual defense policy and spending bills behind closed doors. The Senate panel begins work on the National Defense Authorization Act, likely to stretch into Thursday or Friday, while the House subcommittee should have a fairly quick markup at 5:30 p.m. ahead of full committee consideration, which will be open. Here's a look at both bills: HOUSE DEFENSE SPENDING BILL BOOST PROCUREMENT, BLOCKS ARMY CUTS: The House defense spending bill released Tuesday evening includes an additional $15.7 billion from the war budget moved to cover base Pentagon programs, echoing a similar move by the House Armed Services Committee. With the extra money, the bill boosts procurement funding by $9.6 billion, including an additional 11 F-35 fighters and 14 F/A-18 Super Hornets as well as a third Littoral Combat Ship. The spending measure also reverses the Army's planned end strength cuts and funds a full 2.1 percent military pay raise. The full bill is here, and a summary is here. The measure's funding tables will be released ahead of the full appropriations committee markup. - DEMOCRATS SLAM 'FUNDING GIMMICK': In a sign of the looming defense spending fight, House Appropriations ranking Democrat Nita Lowey of New York issued a statement Tuesday slamming the bill's funding maneuver as a gimmick and "astoundingly irresponsible." "By shifting funding away from Overseas Contingency Operations, the majority would create a cliff just a few months into 2017, forcing the new President to request supplemental funds to pay our troops within weeks after taking office," she said in a statement. SASC DEFENSE POLICY BILL BANS BRAC, INCLUDES LOWER PAY RAISE: The six SASC subcommittees approved their portions of the NDAA Monday and Tuesday, with three of them holding open sessions that teased out a few details of the full Senate bill. The bill would ban a new round of base closures requested by the Pentagon for the fifth straight year, said Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), the Readiness chairwoman. "I do not want to give the department the open-ended authority to pursue another BRAC round that will incur significant up-front costs,' Ayotte said. Personnel Subcommittee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the bill includes a lower-than-projected pay raise of 1.6 percent, rather than 2.1 percent approved by the House. He also added that the bill includes provisions overhauling the military's health-care system aimed at "sustainability, higher quality, better access and ... expand the services." And the changes, he suggested, could be opposed by veterans and military service organizations. - BILL LIKELY TO REQUIRE WOMEN TO REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT: The Senate Armed Services' version of the defense policy bill is likely to include a provision requiring women to register for the draft. "I believe it will be in the mark," Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) told Morning D Tuesday. The defense bill mark from Senate Armed Services Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) has not yet been made public, but if the provision remains after the committee completes its markup, it would follow the House Armed Services Committee, where the requirement was added in as an amendment - although there are efforts to remove it on the House floor. - SENATE APPROPRIATIONS NOT FAR BEHIND: Our Budget and Appropriations colleagues report that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday the defense authorization and appropriations measures are in the Senate floor queue. The Kentucky Republican said they're both likely to be considered after the Senate finishes the Energy and Water appropriations bill and then the Transportation-HUD and Military Construction-VA bill, which will be coupled together. HAPPY WEDNESDAY AND WELCOME TO MORNING DEFENSE, where the coffee is already flowing, and we're not yet halfway through the week. We're hearing SASC can get done by Thursday evening, at least. Keep the tips, pitches and feedback coming at jherb@politico.com, and follow on Twitter @jeremyherb, @morningdefense and @politicopro. HAPPENING TODAY - HEARING ON FOREIGN MILITARY SALES: The defense industry's two leading trade groups testify this morning in the House Armed Services Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. Tom Davis of the Aerospace Industries Association and Remy Nathan of the National Defense Industrial Association will discuss the Pentagon's policies on foreign military sales. ALSO TODAY - CARTER IN SILICON VALLEY: Defense Secretary Ash Carter addresses a meeting of the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee in California. And, in Washington, Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.) discusses the security implications of rapid access to space at a forum hosted by the Heritage Foundation and the Air Force Air University. FROM THE ARCHIVES - HAGEL BLASTS 'DUMB' BLACK BERETS DECISION: On the day Chuck Hagel was nominated for defense secretary, we submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for his communications with the Pentagon from 1997 to 2009, during his time as a Republican senator from Nebraska. We were hoping these letters would shed some light on his views on key issues of the past decade. On Tuesday, three-and-a-half years later, we got a large envelope in the mail with a stack of letters from Hagel to then-Defense Secretaries Donald Rumsfeld and Robert Gates. Given that Hagel has now been out of the government for more than a year, the letters no longer have much news value (except as evidence of the Pentagon's less-than-punctual FOIA system), but there are a few gems worth noting. In 2008, Hagel sent Gates a letter recommending his former Senate aide, Eric Rosenbach, to be deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence. Rosenbach didn't get the job. But he's done pretty well for himself nonetheless, serving in several top Pentagon posts, including now as Carter's chief of staff. Hagel also sent several letters asking about Iraq War issues, and he twice wrote Rumsfeld to urge funding to repair a runway at Offutt Air Force Base back home in Nebraska. In 2001,Hagel sent Rumsfeld a pretty direct handwritten note, complaining about then-Army Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki's decision to make black berets a part of the Army combat uniform - a move that was unpopular among soldiers and has since been reversed. "Dear Don," Hagel wrote. "I hope you personally are taking a look at this dumb 'black beret' decision made by General Shinseki. I expressed my displeasure with this silly decision to Cohen and Shinseki. One dumb decision after the other over there. First, black berets then the 'Army of One' slogan. What the hell is next? I sent the president a note on this yesterday. Thanks, friend." Signed: "An old Army sergeant, Chuck." ** A message from BAE Systems: At BAE Systems, our experts have developed a low-cost gun-launched guided projectile, increasing range, accuracy and efficiency for our military services. Learn more at www.baesystems.com/SAS. ** THE CAPITOL HILL SPACE WARS - HOW ULA WON ROUND 1 IN THE NDAA, we dove into the backstory of the HASC amendment battle: "The House Intelligence chairman was off the grid. As the House Armed Services Committee considered hundreds of amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act, Rep. Duncan Hunter wanted to add one more, seeking to fight back against supporters of United Launch Alliance and their efforts to secure more Russian-made rocket engines. There was just one problem: The congressman needed fellow California Republican Rep. Devin Nunes and the Intelligence Committee to sign off on a waiver. And Nunes wasn't around. "The waiver for Hunter, a SpaceX backer, never came that night. His hands were largely tied as the committee adopted an amendment from Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.) allowing ULA to obtain 18 Russian-made RD-180 rocket engines for its military launches, according to sources familiar with the daylong negotiations among lawmakers, congressional aides and lobbyists from the two companies. The amendment skirmish during last month's House markup was only the opening salvo in this year's Space Wars on Capitol Hill." FOR YOUR RADAR - OBAMA TO VISIT HIROSHIMA, via The Associated Press: "Eager to heal old wounds and galvanize new generations, President Barack Obama this month will become the first sitting American president to visit Hiroshima, where seven decades ago the U.S. dropped the devastating atomic bomb that ushered in the nuclear age. By visiting the peace park near the epicenter of the 1945 attack, the president hopes to reinvigorate efforts worldwide to eliminate nuclear weapons. But in a sign of the extraordinary political sensitivities attached to the gesture, the White House is going out of its way to stress Obama will not come bearing an apology." - SLIDESHOW: What the president will see when he visits Hiroshima. THE SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTE - CHINA SCRAMBLES FIGHTERS AFTER U.S. SAILS WARSHIP, writes Reuters: "China scrambled fighter jets on Tuesday as a U.S. navy ship sailed close to a disputed reef in the South China Sea, a patrol China denounced as an illegal threat to peace which only went to show its defense installations in the area were necessary. ... China's Defense Ministry said two fighter jets were scrambled and three warships shadowed the U.S. ship, telling it to leave." INDUSTRY INTEL - KENDALL SEEKS QUICKER PROGRAM STARTS: The Pentagon's top weapons buyer on Tuesday said he asked the House Armed Services Committee to insert a provision into the committee's defense bill that would allow programs to start ahead of a budget cycle should they be urgently needed to keep pace with new threats. "I'm thinking about a surprise, where if a threat shows up on the battlefield ... We need to start right away with the countermeasure," Frank Kendall said. But the House Armed Services Committee did not include the provision in the defense policy bill, according to a congressional staff member. SPEED READ - Dozens of people are killed by a car bomb in a Shiite neighborhood in Baghdad: AP - At least 10 people are dead in a suicide bombing in Afghanistan in front of a pro-government militia commander's residence: Reuters - U.S. and Afghan commandos rescue the son of a former Pakistani prime minister in Afghanistan: The Washington Post - Iran announces the delivery of an S-300 air-defense missile system from Russia, part of a 2007 deal that was halted by complaints from the U.S. and Russia: The Washington Post - The Citadel military college in South Carolina denies a request from a female Muslim student to wear a headscarf: AP - Ben Rhodes and the tough sell of the president's foreign policy: POLITICO Magazine - Classified information was inadvertently disclosed at a February Guantanamo military commission hearing: POLITICO - The Navy tells Lockheed Martin to correct quality control failures in its version of the Littoral Combat Ship: Bloomberg - Boeing's $19 billion stock buybacks over the past three years have analysts worried the company is borrowing from the future: The Wall Street Journal - The Islamic State distributes lengthy "kill lists" of ordinary Americans, raising questions over whether the lists are a legitimate threat or scare tactics: WSJ - A new "fifth-generation" military drone being developed as a target for training missions could become a wingman for F-22 and F-35 fighters: The Daily Beast - A Syrian national was extradited to the U.S. on charges of helping hack and extort American targets viewed as enemies of Syrian President Bashar Assad: AP - The Air Force will announce the name of the new B-21 bomber during the Air Force Association's conference in September: Defense News ** A message from BAE Systems: At BAE Systems, we work relentlessly to stay ahead of any challenge our customers may face. Our passion and dedication shows in everything we do-from advanced electronic systems to cyber operations and intelligence analysis, from combat vehicles and naval weapons, and from ship maintenance and modernization to vehicle upgrades and services. Knowing that our work makes a difference inspires us to push ourselves and the technologies we create to new levels. That's BAE Systems. That's Inspired Work. Learn more about our technologies, systems and services at www.baesystems.com/US. ** To view online: To change your alert settings, please go to or email was sent to kaplanj@dnc.org by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA To unsubscribe,


I'd like to claim the parenthood of desktop web services, but then there's a ton of people doing it now. What I am the parent of is, Jackson Alan Bolcer--I just realized that the birth announcement was something that didn't get sent through due to my general laziness of being kicked off of FoRK from our stupid DNS fiasco mixed with the post filtering. August 20th, 7lbs, 14oz, 8:30pm. Greg Geege Schuman wrote: > > Aren't you Dr. Gregory A. Bolcer, Dutch Uncle of P2P? > > -----Original Message----- > From: fork-admin@xent.com On Behalf Of > Gregory Alan Bolcer > Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 10:21 AM > To: FoRK > Subject: introductions > > As I've had to resubscribe to fork and fork-noarchive, > I guess I have to reintroduce myself. I'm formerly > known as gbolcer at endtech dot com to the FoRK > mailman program, formerly an overposter, and love > soaking up bits through avid reading or scanning > of almost every single list that's got informative to say. > > Hopefully all those overpost will get cleared out at > somepoint and fork-archived. > > Greg


Dear Customer, Please login to your PayPal account and remove the limitation from your account In accordance with PayPal's User Agreement and to ensure that your account has not been compromised access to your account was limited. Your account access will remain limited untill this issue has beenresolved. To Login, please click the link below: Copyright © 1999-2009 PayPal. All rights reserved.


URL: #85537496 Date: Not supplied Curcumin, the chemical that makes curry yellow, turns out to be a good compound for treating radiation burns resulting from cancer therapy. Link[1] Discuss[2] (_Thanks, Cheryl!_) [1]  [2]


In the last week, Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, has walked back from his pledge to release his tax returns , vowed to slash taxes for those at the top (like himself), been mocked for pretending to be his own publicist , refused to address his well-documented history of misogyny , insulted one of our country's most important allies , and sat back as his campaign called their selection of a white supremacist delegate a "database error." This is just the latest in a long history of backpedaling, half-truths and lies from Trump. With each day on the campaign trail, Donald Trump gives voters more examples of his recklessness, lack of judgment and unstable temperament. It's obvious that he's unfit to be commander in chief. These are just a few of the many reasons why Democrats will head into the general election energized as we fight for the values and priorities of the American people. As we move closer to our convention and the election in November, it's clearer than ever we must elect a Democrat as our 45th president. Trump's financials: it's "none of your business" Never mind that Donald Trump previously stated that he "probably wouldn't have a problem with" releasing his tax returns or that if you're running for president, "at a minimum, probably, you're going to have to show your returns." But this week, when he released his Personal Financial Disclosures - they still hid the truth . His refusal to release his returns breaks from the precedent set by every major-party presidential nominee dating back to 1976. Trump's justification? It's "none of your business." But the hypocrisy doesn't stop there. Trump just announced that all vice presidential hopefuls looking to join his train wreck of a ticket will have to turn over their tax returns for vetting. How ironic . Trump's refusal to release his tax returns and the false claim that voters wouldn't learn anything from them anyway, show that Trump is more than willing to keep misleading the American people. If he can't manage to hold himself to his own standards, that begs the question, what is he hiding? From withholding tax returns, to his plans to tear up the most important financial reforms in decades, Trump and his dangerous ideas shouldn't step foot in the White House. Hardworking American families cannot afford Trump's dangerous ideas on the economy, which would only benefit those at the very top. Important Polls * According to a poll from CBS and the New York Times, 84 percent of Republicans say their party is divided now. * According to a poll from CBS and the New York Times, 80 percent of Democratic voters are hopeful about their party's future. What people are writing in the states Our nation is in the midst of a worsening infrastructure crisis, but Republicans in Congress have refused to act to ensure safety on our roads and bridges. This week was National Infrastructure Week, which highlights the common interests of labor and business in calling for additional investments in infrastructure. Democrats around the country have shown that from now until November 8th, we're going to hold Republicans up and down the ballot accountable for their divisive and dangerous policies. Below is a sampling of the work from our state parties: Statements IDP Calls on Rep. David Young to Ensure Our Safety and Invest in Our Nation's Infrastructure - Iowa Democratic Party Clean Water Week #TBT: Kelly Ayotte Voted Against Clean Water Protections - New Hampshire Democratic Party ICYMI: Senator Casey Calls For Investment In Railway Safety - Pennsylvania Democratic Party Ohio Elected Officials Recognize "National Infrastructure Week," Call For Increased Investments To Create Jobs - Ohio Democratic Party Articles and Op-eds Notes on Kamp: Our Transportation Crisis AUSTIN CHRONICLE // AMY KAMP Local Democratic leaders push infrastructure bills THE JOURNAL NEWS // ED RICHTER View this post on our Factivists site here . ###


We will move this to his book Tuesday. We have also started posting the price and position reports to the website. We will stop e-mailing these out after today. There will be 13 new curves in your gas daily curves for the EOL curves starting no later than Wednesday. These are all the curves the EOL website reports for the West desk. Thanks Kam -----Original Message----- From: Grigsby, Mike Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:23 PM To: Keiser, Kam Subject: RE: Transport model Let's go ahead and move it. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Keiser, Kam Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:35 PM To: Grigsby, Mike Subject: Transport model Would you like us to move the "Ermis" piece of the transport model to Frank's book this month or wait until Dec? Kam ps. Monte will start running your model before he calc's for the day on Monday. Thanks Kam


Rn Sent from my iPhone


Hi, Cjialis from 3, 75 $ Vjiagra from 3, 35 $ Ambjien Valjium from 1, 25 $ , , , , , Not cruel. Just pointing out a few truths. This mission first. Overdrinking, hangovers and Technicolor yawns saved for our victory celebration.


Your New Daily Edition If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view it in a browser.         CLICK HERE FOR TODAY'S EDITION How MGM Rode The Hobbit to Possible IPO Payday Once-floundering studio roaring as Tolkien, Bond pics spark stock spikes, deal buzz End-of-Year Box-Office Crunch Gets Underway Potpourri of commercial titles, award contenders set to be unleashed in coming week Why Cable Mergers Could Dominate in 2014 Volume of deal chatter growing as consolidation equals power in booming TV business Katie Couric Talk Show Officially Cancelled Decision to end Katie after two seasons described as mutual between h


I agree I think this accomplishes what we need Sent from my iPhone On May 17, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Tracie Pough > wrote: The second statement will make this go on longer and open DWS and the DNC up for more criticism. From: Paustenbach, Mark Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 1:19 PM To: Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Miranda, Luis; Banfill, Ryan; Tracie Pough; Dacey, Amy Subject: FOR REVIEW: DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter The main difference between the two statements is the portion in yellow in the second one. VERSION 1: MEASURED For Immediate Release May 17, 2016 Contact: DNC Press – 202-863-8148 DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter WASHINGTON – DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz today issued the following statement on a letter from the Nevada Democratic Party regarding threatening and violent behavior among some participants around their state party convention this weekend: "We are deeply concerned about the troubling details laid out in the letter from the Nevada Democratic Party. We will be reaching out to the leadership of both of our campaigns to ask them to stand with the Democratic Party in denouncing the type of behavior on display over the weekend in Las Vegas. Our democracy is undermined any time threats, intimidation, physical violence or damage to property are present. If there are legitimate concerns, they must be addressed in an orderly, civil and peaceful manner. "The rules governing the Democratic Party delegate selection process have been in place for decades and the specific procedures for this cycle were agreed upon in 2014. In Nevada on Saturday, the state party's credentials committee was made up of an equal number of members representing both campaigns. That's a testament to our party's fundamental belief in being inclusive, open to the public, and transparent. The process for nominating a Democratic Presidential candidate is not something taken lightly, it is a four-year endeavor that is closely scrutinized and determined in public forums, just as it has been in past election cycles. There is no excuse for what happened in Nevada, and it is incumbent upon all of us in positions of leadership to speak out." ### VERSION 2: FORTHRIGHT AND THOUGHTFUL For Immediate Release May 17, 2016 Contact: DNC Press – 202-863-8148 DNC Statement on Nevada Democratic Party Letter WASHINGTON – DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz today issued the following statement on a letter from the Nevada Democratic Party regarding threatening and violent behavior among some participants around their state party convention this weekend: "We are deeply concerned about the troubling details laid out in the letter from the Nevada Democratic Party. We will be reaching out to the leadership of both of our campaigns to ask them to stand with the Democratic Party in denouncing the type of behavior on display over the weekend in Las Vegas. Our democracy is undermined any time threats, intimidation, physical violence or damage to property are present. If there are legitimate concerns, they must be addressed in an orderly, civil and peaceful manner. "We are also asking both campaigns to be forthright and thoughtful in their characterization of the primary process. The rules governing the Democratic Party delegate selection process have been in place for decades and the specific procedures for this cycle were agreed upon in 2014. In Nevada on Saturday, the state party's credentials committee was made up of an equal number of members representing both campaigns. That's a testament to our fundamental belief in being inclusive, open to the public, and transparent. The process for nominating a Democratic Presidential candidate is not something taken lightly, it is a four-year endeavor that is closely scrutinized and determined in public forums just as it has been in past election cycles. There is no excuse for what happened in Nevada, and it is incumbent upon all of us in positions of leadership to speak out." ###


Your meeting was forwarded Palermo, Rachel has forwarded your meeting request to additional recipients. Meeting Lunch with Ryan Meeting Time Monday, May 02, 2016 12:00 PM-1:00 PM. Recipients Paustenbach, Mark Guerra, Liana All times listed are in the following time zone: (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) ________________________________ Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2010


Invitation for Sony Pictures Entertainment to Apply to Present at 2014 National Business Funding Conference - Yale Club New York Â 2014NationalBusinessFundingConference Opportunity to Present on June 26th at the Yale Club New York to over 100 of America's Leading Angels, Private Equity Firms & Venture Capital Investors Dear Amy:Â We are now in the process of finalizing the slate of Presenters for our 2014 National Business Funding Conference being held in the Grand Ballroom of Yale Club New York on Thursday, June 26th. As you may not have had a chance to focus on our upcoming forum, I am following-up on my earlier correspondence to see if you were raising capital now and possibly interested in having Sony Pictures Entertainment present at this well-established funding venue. If you would like to apply for a Presenter slot, we do have a few openings still available for late entrants. In the event that you are not familiar our "investor-only" forums, you can see numerous testimonials from other entrepreneurs at www.privateequityforums.com/entre-test.html. To learn more about me and our organization, please look at my LinkedIn Profile at www.linkedin.com/in/mjsegal. Â Reserving Presenter Slot and Application Process: As a courtesy, we can tentatively hold a Presenter slot while you are considering this opportunity, subject to your confirmation and a customary review of the company on our part. To get things in motion, just send your Executive Summary to me at mike.segal@verizon.net and I will get back to you as quickly as possible. Companies will be considered for the event in the order that their information is received by our firm. If you have any questions or would like to speak to me first, which is what I would prefer, please feel free to call me at 646 559 2868. As time is short, kindly try to contact me as soon as possible with respect to your interest in being on the program and we will do our best to accommodate you. Although we have not had a chance to talk about this event or your company's funding requirements, as I had previously indicated, our correspondence is not part of a bulk mailing being delivered to you by a commercial e-mailing service and has been sent it on the basis of general research that our staff has undertaken on your company based upon its industry sector and stage of operations. Of course, we do not know the growth plans of your company or its need for capital, but are always on the lookout for promising companies that may resonate with our investors.Â To be Taken Off our List of Potential Presenter Candidates, Please Reply with "Delete" in the Subject Line: If you are all set with your funding needs and existing capital sources, in accordance with the requirement to provide an easy-to-use way to be removed, just reply via return e-mail with a notation to "delete" in the subject line using lower-case type and I'll be sure to take your e-mail address of amy_pascal@spe.sony.com off our list of potential Presenter candidates right away. I am sure that the last thing you need are more unwanted e-mails. (Kindly do not use "all caps" or exclamation points in the subject line to ensure that your request is not inadvertently blocked.) As we have recently made some changes to our database management system, my apologies if you have made a prior request which has not yet been processed. Feature Article in The Opportunist Magazine: We are very proud that our organization was selected by one of the leading business and investment publications, "The Opportunist Magazine", for the cover story in their December 13th, 2011 issue, for which I was interviewed. If you would like to read this article entitled "Connecting Investors and Entrepreneurs", just go to The article addresses the issues associated with capital raising and chronicles the reasons for the long-standing success of our business funding venues. Overview and Background: These deal-oriented venues that we have been hosting for almost 14 years are among the best investor-attended events of their kind in the U.S. This will be our 50th consecutive venue, all of which since June of 2001 have been fully-booked. During this period, I believe that we have provided entrepreneurs with greater access to more investors than any other organization in the country. Entrepreneurs see our forums as highly effective and less costly alternative to hiring an investment banker or traveling extensively to raise capital. In today's tight-money environment, many promising businesses, from early to later-stage and middle-market, are finding it difficult to obtain financing as their current banking and private investor relationships are no longer reliable funding sources. If your money raising efforts are not going as quickly as you would like, this forum could be an ideal vehicle to help you accelerate the process. This exclusive "investor-centric" gathering can provide a highly effective and prestigious setting for your company to deliver its vision to a captive audience of well-qualified capital sources. As investors will be attending from throughout the United States, you can think of the upcoming event as a "Road Show" that comes to you. If you need to get a round of funding closed during the second half of this year, this unique capital raising forum can provide you with a prestigious national platform to reach over 100 serious early and later stage investors, who have paid to attend and are there to see deals, NOT to be judges, speakers or panelists. Our Registrants will include leading private equity, venture capital firms and Angel groups from throughout the U.S. In addition, a good number of individual Angels and prominent high net worth investors will be joining us. The strong investor response to this and our recent forums would indicate that there is no shortage of interest from investment funds and private investors who are looking for serious opportunities in promising companies. Â Our Value Proposition: It is important for you to keep in mind that this is a non-government subsidized / privately underwritten event, which is essentially a co-op for the 15 to 20 presenting companies. In order to ensure Presenters that our venues are not compromised by a large population of vendors and service providers, we do not rely upon paid sponsors to support our events. Accordingly, we underwrite the events with our own funds and the featured companies pay a fee to cover the overhead costs, which is substantially less than the costs of engaging a placement agent or going on a road show to reach the same number and caliber of investors. We have a wide range of visibility options, designed to address the diverse financial resources of our featured companies.. As every company differs with respect to its financial resources, stage, revenues and funding requirements, we do not have a "one-size-fits-all" structure with respect to fees, payment terms or visibility options and will do our best to get a qualified company on the conference program within the framework of their budget. Â The upcoming venue can help you solve the three biggest problems in raising capital: 1) identifying qualified investors, 2) gaining credible entrée to them and 3) meeting them under favorable circumstances. Moreover, the event drives the single most important factor in getting funded quickly, and that is the ability to create "contemporaneous interest" among investors, which also can serve to significantly improve deal terms. Â To Get the Presenter Application Process Started, Please Call. Do Not Write: In order to provide you with a timely response, thank you for Not sending me questions about the event that require an e-mail response. I have found that a brief conversation first can save a great deal of time on the back-and-forth of e-mail exchanges and will give me the opportunity to respond to your questions in the context of your company's capital needs and financial position. At that time we can discuss your company's qualifications to present, its funding requirements, venue details and any costs involved. Â I sincerely believe that if a company's potential is truly compelling, and that management's vision can be effectively communicated, it will not find a more cost-effective way to reach potential funding sources directly, than by presenting at this event. This will be a superb opportunity to get your message across in "one place and in one day" to active serious investors - who want to see fundable deals. Â Again, If you are all-set with your funding and would prefer not to receive any further information on our investor conferences, kindly let me know by return e-mail and you e-mail address will be promptly deleted. Because this e-mail has not been sent to you commercial e-mailing service, there is no Remove button, but as required, we do provide an easy and convenient way to be taken of our list by just using the Reply feature and putting " delete" in the subject line. Â More information on the event and Presenter qualifications can be found at www.privateequityforums.com. Â Look forward to being in touch and learning about your funding requirements. Â Kindest regards, Â Mike Â 646 559 2868 Â LinkedIn Profile Â MJSEGALASSOCIATES 531 Main St. ▪ Suite 1116 Â New York, New York 10044 Â PS: About "So-Called" Free Events: We all know the expression, "If something is too good to be true, it probably is." Over the years we have clearly demonstrated, as is the case with most things in life, "It is not what - or if you pay, but what you get for what you pay." Please keep in mind that any investor venue (irrespective of its quality) that offers the opportunity to present for free is ONLY free for those who are selected from, what is in most cases, hundreds of companies that have applied. And if you are NOT selected, the fact that it was free to present made absolutely no difference - and you are back to the open-end costs of knocking on the doors of investors with perhaps little or no entrée. In many venues, companies that are selected to present for free are then charged up to $1,000 per person for each member of the management team who attends. So was it really free to present? Clearly not. Conferences of our quality cost tens of thousands of dollars to produce. Accordingly someone has to pay for them - raising the question, are presenting companies at these supposedly free venues getting real value? Are they talking to an audience of bona fide investors, as is the case with our events, or to seats that are full of vendors and service providers who have funded the venue? For those entrepreneurs who do not make the cut to present at "so-called" free events, then they need to pay to be there - in most cases, from about $700 to $1,500 per person. To present at our events, entrepreneurs are selected based upon their "individual merit" - not graded on a curve and do not need to win a competition based upon some subjective definition of "The Best". I wonder if Cisco Systems, Amazon, Google, e-Bay or Starbucks would have made it through a presenter selection contest. Looking at the number of VCs who turned many of them down, I would say probably not… WE SIMPLY WANT TO SEE QUALIFIED COMPANIES, BASED UPON REASONABLE CRITERIA, SUCH AS SCALABILITY AND PROPRIETARY ADVANTAGE, WHICH WE BELIEVE ARE LIKELY TO RESONATE WITH A GOOD PERCENTAGE OF OUR INVESTORS AND ARE RUN BY CAPABLE ENTREPRENEURS WHO UNDERSTAND THE PRUDENCE AND WISDOM OF INTELLIGENTLY COMMITTING SOME DOLLARS TO ACCELERATE THEIR CAPITAL RAISING EFFORTS… New York Private Equity Forums - Guest Registry Index to Select Current and Prior Conference Guests by Industry Sector Preferences Please select from the sectors below to see the some of the industry preferences of our current registrants and prior attendees. Note that investment groups who indicate a specific focus do not necessarily limit their investments to those sectors. More detailed information is displayed on their websites for which links are provided after clicking on the applicable sector preference. A listing of our registrants' portfolio companies is provided where available. If your company is selected to present, M. J. Segal Associates can provide you with introductions to any of the firms listed on the conference website, irrespective of their attendance at the upcoming event. All or Most Industry Sectors Alternative Energy / Cleantech / Environmental Technology Advanced Technology / Nano Tech Agriculture / Construction Chemicals / Process Industries Communications / Telecommunications


zzzz@example.com (Justin Mason) writes: > /dev/fd/0 is STDIN -- filedescriptor 0. Looks like the PS file wants > to know its filename, but it's being read from STDIN, that's my > guess. I don't think so: it should be getting a stream of PS from stdin, but it's not. The printing/spooling system is executing gs but somehow failing to provide it with input. > Try tweaking the scripts to run "gs" with the ps file on > the command line instead of as "-". That might clarify that the later part of the system works, but I suspect the problem is earlier. B -- Brendan Halpin, Dept of Government and Society, Limerick University, Ireland Tel: w +353-61-213147 f +353-61-202569 h +353-61-390476; Room F2-025 x 3147 -- Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie  for (un)subscription information. List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie


PitchBook Newsletters #a{width:187px;} #b{outline:medium none;border:none;} #c{border:none;width:16px;height:16px;} #d{margin-right:5px;margin-top:2px;} #e{color:#476690;text-decoration:none;} #f{border-top:2px solid white;border-bottom:2px solid white;} #g{line-height:19px;} #h{padding-bottom:15px;color:#333;line-height:19px;} #i{font-size:14px;font-family:tahoma, arial;text-decoration:none;color:#476690;} #j{line-height:16px;margin-bottom:3px;} #k{color:#476690;text-decoration:none;width:187px;} #l{color:#c60;text-decoration:none;} #m{color:#f60;line-height:19px;} #n{font:14px tahoma, arial;color:#666;} #o{color:#333;} #p{margin-top:7px;width:100%;float:none;} #q{margin:0px 0px 15px 0;} #r{width:400px;font-size:20px;font-family:tahoma, arial;font-weight:bold;color:#333;} #s{color:#777777;margin-right:5px;margin-top:2px;font-family:arial,helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;} #t{margin:4px 0px 4px 0;} #u{font-size:14px;font-family:tahoma, arial;color:#333333;} #v{margin:15px 0px 15px 0;} #w{font-size:14px;font-family:tahoma, arial;color:#333;} #x{color:#476690;} #y{font-family:verdana;font-size:13px;} #z{text-decoration:none;} #aa{padding-top:3px;} #ab{font-size:14px;font-family:tahoma, arial;color:#666;} #ac{font-size:11px;font-family:arial;font-weight:bold;white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;} #ad{height:30px;} #ae{color:white;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;font-weight:bold;} #af{text-decoration:none;white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;} #ag{line-height:5px;} #ah{font-size:11px;font-family:arial;color:#476690;white-space:nowrap;} #ai{color:#476990;font-size:14px;font-family:tahoma, arial;text-decoration:none;} #aj{margin-left:7px;} #ak{line-height:20px;} #al{line-height:16px;margin-bottom:3px;border-bottom:1px solid #ccc;padding-bottom:5px;} #am{border:none;} #an{padding:0px;margin:0px;border:0px;} #ao{font-size:16px;line-height:20px;font-family:tahoma, arial;margin-bottom:3px;padding-bottom:5px;border-bottom:1px solid #ccc;width:187px;} #ap{color:#fff;margin-left:5px;} #aq{color:#476990;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;font-family:tahoma, arial;text-decoration:none;width:187px;} #ar{background-color:#476990;border:solid 11px #476990;font-size:20px;font-family:tahoma, arial;font-weight:bold;color:white;} #as{text-align:right;font-size:9px;color:gray;} #at{text-align:left;font-size:10px;color:gray;text-align:justify;padding-top:2px;} #au{font-family:tahoma, arial;float:none;} #av{width:420px;} #aw{width:402px;} #ax{border-bottom:1px solid #ccc;height:0px;font-size:1px;} #ay{margin-bottom:10px;text-align:center;overflow:hidden;} #az{color:white;} #ba{margin:0px 15px 18px 0px;} #bb{font-size:12px;font-family:arial;color:rgb (255, 255, 255);text-decoration:none;cursor:pointer;} #bc{font-family:tahoma, arial;float:right;color:#666;} #bd{width:420px;text-align:center;margin:6px 6px 6px 0;} #be{margin:0px 0px 8px 0;margin-bottom:15px;} #bf{margin:0px 0px 8px 0;} #bg{margin-bottom:8px;} #bh{font:bold 14px tahoma, arial;text-transform:uppercase;color:#333;text-decoration:none;} #bi{font-weight:bold;} #bj{border-bottom:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden;} #bk{margin-top:8px;font:12px/20px tahoma, arial;color:#666;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:4px solid white;} #bl{font-size:14px;line-height:20px;font-family:tahoma, arial;color:#476690;text-decoration:none;} #bm{margin-top:3px;font:12px/17px tahoma, arial;} #bn{border-collapse:collapse;text-align:left;} #bo{font-weight:bold;font-size:14px;line-height:20px;font-family:tahoma, arial;color:#666;} #bp{border-collapse:collapse;background-color:white;} #bq{text-align:left;} #br{font-size:12px;font-family:arial;font-weight:bold;} #bs{background-color:#e1e1e1;} #bt{font-family:tahoma, arial;float:center;color:#666;} #bu{border-collapse:collapse;} #bv{font:12px arial;color:#466890;text-decoration:none;} #bw{font-size:12px;font-family:arial;color:#333333;} #bx{height:5px;background-color:#476990;width:100%;} #by{height:78px;} #bz{background-color:white;line-height:10px;height:10px;max-height:10px;} #ca{font-size:12px;font-family:arial;color:#466890;text-decoration:none;} #cb{color:#476990;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;font-family:tahoma, arial;text-decoration:none;width:402px;} #cc{height:10px;} #uca{background:white;} #ucb{cursor:pointer;color:white;font-size:11px;line-height:35px;font-family:arial;white-space:nowrap;text-decoration:none;text-transform:uppercase;} #ucc{background-color:#496990;width:13px;} #ucd{background-color:#496990;} #uce{text-align:left;}   View Online Connect:      PitchBook Newsletter Venture Capital Edition   Powered by the PitchBook Platform. Learn more» 317,743  Deals |  29,167  Funds |  16,190  Limited Partners |  19,638  Advisors   MONDAY, MARCH 9, 2015     /* For PitchBook view */ .newsletter-content .news-mid-table { margin-left: 0; margin-right: 0; } @media screen and (max-width: 640px) { /* For iPhone view */ .news-mid-table { margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px; } .mobile-image { border: 1px solid red; } .mobile-image img { display: none; } } Featured Profile Bain Capital Ventures SHARE: Bain Capital Ventures made its 10th deal of the year with an investment in Booker, a business management and marketing software provider. Check out the firm's recent deals (which include leading a $140 million financing of e-commerce startup Jet), closed funds and more with a look through today's free PitchBook Profile. Bain Capital Ventures AUM: $3.1 billion   View Featured Profile    VIEW 171 INVESTMENTS » Today's Top Stories 10 of the Fastest-growing Companies You Don't Know About SHARE: At PitchBook, we have a lot of data. A lot of it. But what's even better than having a vast amount of data is being able to make sense of it. One of the many ways we're doing this is by scouring the 20,000+ VC round valuations we track and identifying which have seen the most significant jumps recently—not in terms of total value but in terms of size multiple. This allows us to dig up some of the fastest-growing companies that likely aren't headlining news stories across the internet (just yet). Below are 10 companies that experienced the largest growth during February according to their pre-money valuation step-up multiples, a metric obtained by dividing a company's current valuation by the valuation of its previous round. Click to enlarge To see more companies on the list, click here .   3 Key Points from Global PE & VC Benchmarking Report SHARE: With more than a decade's worth of global fund performance data, our Global PE & VC Benchmarking Report analyzes IRRs, fund return multiples, cash flows and much more. Check out three key takeaways from the report here . Today's Headlines The Daily Benchmark 2008 Vintage U.S. VC Funds with Software Investments Completed VC Financings Quixey Announces $60M Series C1 HoneyBook Lands $22M Swiftype Raises $13M Series B Evidation Health Launches with $6.2M Series A Trucker Path Grabs $1.5M Investment $1.2M Seed Fills Up Studypool Europe Musement Books €5M Series A Exit & Liquidity News MaxPoint Completes IPO Fundraising News G20 Ventures Closes The Daily Benchmark 2008 Vintage U.S. VC Funds with Software Investments SHARE: 118 Funds in Benchmark Median IRR: 13 .42% Top Quartile IRR Hurdle Rate: 19 .45% Median TVPI: 1 .36x Median RVPI: 0 .98x Select Top Performers (based on net IRR) Harbert Venture Partners II Maveron Equity Partners IV Morgenthaler Venture Partners IX Spark Capital II   Benchmark, Peer Group & Returns Data on 20,000 Funds PitchBook, setting a higher bar for performance benchmarking Completed VC Financings Quixey Announces $60M Series C1 SHARE: Quixey has announced it raised $60 million in a Series C1 round led by Alibaba (NYSE: BABA), with participation from SoftBank , Goldman Sachs and GGV . The company is developing a mobile search solution that leverages deep-linking technology, helping users find the right apps and functionality for their needs. Quixey's new round reportedly values it at about $600 million, more than 3x the post valuation it received with its $50 million Series C funding in October 2013 ($181 million). Quixey Information Services Mobile Mountain View, CA $60 million Series C1   VIEW DETAILS    VIEW 43 COMPARABLES » Investors Alibaba (lead) SoftBank GGV Goldman Sachs   HoneyBook Lands $22M SHARE: HoneyBook , the provider of a collaborative platform for event planning, has raised $22 million in a round led by Norwest Venture Partners . The round generated a valuation of $80 million, well up from the $30 million valuation the company received with its $9 million raise in September. Capital from the new financing will help HoneyBook scale its platform and expand its offering to cities such as New York and Los Angeles; until recently, the services were only available by invitation in the San Francisco Bay Area. HoneyBook Business/Productivity Software SaaS San Francisco, CA $22 million Late Stage VC   VIEW DETAILS    VIEW 34 COMPARABLES » Lead Investor Norwest Venture Partners   Swiftype Raises $13M Series B SHARE: Swiftype has raised $13 million in Series B funding led by New Enterprise Associates . Founded in 2012, the company offers a hosted search solution that lets users deliver customizable search for their website or apps. Since its previous funding in late 2013, Swiftype has increased bookings more than 5x and search query volume by 10x. As part of the latest round, NEA partner Chetan Puttagunta will join the company's Board of Directors. Swiftype Media and Information Services SaaS Mobile San Francisco, CA $13 million Series B   VIEW DETAILS    VIEW 65 COMPARABLES » Lead Investor New Enterprise Associates   Evidation Health Launches with $6.2M Series A SHARE: GE Ventures and Stanford Health Care have launched Evidation Health , a company focused on combining health outcomes data with new approaches to predictive analytics to identify, improve and deploy patient management strategies and interventions. Evidation Health Healthcare Practice Management Big Data HealthTech Menlo Park, CA $6.2 million Series A     VIEW DETAILS      VIEW 52 COMPARABLES »   Investors GE Ventures (lead) Asset Management Ventures Rock Health   Trucker Path Grabs $1.5M Investment SHARE: Trucker Path is a platform that helps freight carriers find truckloads through a mobile app and connects shippers or brokers with the right carriers. Trucker Path Application Software Mobile Mountain view, CA $1.5 million Early Stage VC   VIEW DETAILS    VIEW 270 COMPARABLES » Investors Renren   $1.2M Seed Fills Up Studypool SHARE: By using the Studypool platform, users are able to ask academic questions and receive answers from verified tutors. Studypool Social/Platform Software SaaS EdTech San Francisco, CA $1.2 million Seed   VIEW DETAILS    VIEW 162 COMPARABLES » Investors Lerer Hippeau Ventures (lead) 500 Startups Fabrice Grinda Great Oaks Venture Capital Europe Musement Books €5M Series A SHARE: Musement is an online travel booking service that curates and showcases experiences for travelers; the company's offering is available in seven languages. Musement Information Services SaaS Mobile Milano, Italy €5 million Series A   VIEW DETAILS    VIEW 56 COMPARABLES » Investors 360° Capital Partners Micheli Associati Italian Angels for Growth P101 Exit & Liquidity News MaxPoint Completes IPO SHARE: MaxPoint Interactive completed its IPO Friday, pricing shares at $11.50 and raising $74.75 million; shares of the company closed the trading session down over 15% at $9.76. A provider of business intelligence and digital marketing solutions, MaxPoint listed its shares on the NYSE under the symbol MXPT. It raised nearly $26 million in VC prior to the offering, receiving backing from Trinity Ventures (32.2% pre-IPO stake) and Madrona Venture Group (23.6%), among others. MaxPoint Interactive Media and Information Services AdTech Morrisville, NC $74.75 million IPO   VIEW DETAILS    VIEW 46 COMPARABLES » Lead Underwriters Goldman Sachs Deutsche Bank Fundraising News G20 Ventures Closes SHARE: G20 Ventures has closed its debut fund with $63.45 million in commitments. The firm's investment focus is on early stage enterprise software, infrastructure and internet solutions companies based on the U.S. East Coast, specifically Boston, New York City and Raleigh, N.C. G20 Ventures I Boston, MA Venture Capital $63.45 million (closed)   VIEW DETAILS    VIEW 2 INVESTMENTS » The best tool for venture capital professionals to:   Source Deals   Run Private Comps   Benchmark IRRs/Funds   Target LPs/Fundraising   Competitive Intelligence   Company Signals   Most Active Investors   Find Co-Investors   Analyze Market Trends   Find Strategic Buyers   VIDEO WALKTHROUGHS LOG-IN TO PITCHBOOK Want to learn more? Contact our team of venture capital specialists. US +1 (206) 623-1986 UK +44 (0)207-190-9809 demo@pitchbook.com Who's in the News? Companies Evidation Health HoneyBook MaxPoint Interactive Musement Quixey Stanford Health Care Studypool Swiftype Trucker Path Investors 360° Capital Partners 500 Startups Alibaba Asset Management Ventures Bain Capital Ventures Fabrice Grinda G20 Ventures GE Ventures GGV Goldman Sachs Great Oaks Venture Capital Italian Angels for Growth Lerer Hippeau Ventures Madrona Venture Group Micheli Associati New Enterprise Associates Norwest Venture Partners P101 Renren Rock Health SoftBank Trinity Ventures Service Providers Deutsche Bank Goldman Sachs People Chetan Puttagunta   PitchBook Platform Video of the Day Identifying CFOs at PE-backed Companies » More Video Walkthroughs » Identifying Emerging Companies By Industry » Identifying Emerging Companies By Location » Excel Plugin: Building a Chart » Excel Plugin: Finding Companies & Data Fields » Excel Plugin: Opening a Template »   About PitchBook  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us Copyright © 2015 PitchBook Data, Inc. All rights reserved. - Private Equity and Venture Capital Deals Database Newsletter sent to: v.bedeschi@hackingteam.it Want this newsletter sent to a different email address? Change your email address here. You are currently receiving the Venture Capital Edition of the newsletter. Click here if you'd like to switch to the Private Equity Edition or the PE & VC Edition of the newsletter. If you would like to unsubscribe from this newsletter, Unsubscribe here. --


Great Tom, I think we are converging to much clearer meanings across various cultures here. Please get the inconclusive out! By the way, "possible" still has some logical issues as it is true for very large or very small probabilities in principle, but if you define it clearly it is probably OK--but "quite possible" conveys medium confidence better--but then why not use medium confidence, as the 3 rounds of review over the guidance paper concluded after going through exactly the kinds of disucssions were having now. Thanks, Steve On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 tkarl@ncdc.noaa.gov wrote: > > > Steve, I agree with your assesement of inconclusive --- quite possible is > much better and we use 'possible' in the US National Assessment. Surveys > has shown that the term 'possible' is interpreted in this range by the > public. > > Tom > > > > > Stephen H Schneider on 08/23/2000 03:02:33 AM > > > > To: Thomas Stocker > > cc: Jerry Meehl , Timothy Carter > , maureen.joseph@eci.ox.ac.uk, > lindam@ucar.edu, m.hulme@uea.ac.uk, > peter.whetton@dar.csiro.au, giorgi@ictp.trieste.it, > Tom Karl/NCDC, cubasch@dkrz.de, > ckfolland@meto.gov.uk, hewitson@egs.uct.ac.za, > "Stouffer, Ron" > > > > Subject: Re: THC collapse > > > > > > > > > > Hello all. I appreciate the improvement in the table from WG 1, > particularly the inclusion of symmetrical confidence levels--but please > get rid of the ridiculous "inconclusive" for the .34 to .66 subjective > probability range. It will convey a completely differnt meaning to lay > persons--read decisionmakers--since that probability range represents > medium levels of confidence, not rare events. A phrase like "quite > possible" is closer to popular lexicon, but inconclusive applies as well > to very likely or very unlikely events and is undoubtedly going to be > misinterpreted on the outside. I also appreciate the addition of > increasing huricane intensities with warming moving out of the catch all > less than .66 category it was in the SOD. > I do have some concerns with the THC issue as dealt with here--echoing > the comments of Tim Carter and Thomas Stocker. I fully agree that the > likelihood of a complete collapse in the THC by 2100 is very remote, but > to leave it at that is very misleading to policymakers given than there is > both empirical and modeling evidence that such events can be triggered by > phenomena in one century, but the occurrence of the event may be delayed > a century or two more. Given also that the likelihood of a collapse > depends on several uncertain parameters--CO2 stabilization level, CO2 > buildup rate, climate sensitivity, hydrological sensitivity and initial > THC overturning rates, it is inconceivable to me that we could be 99% sure > of anything--implied by the "exceptionally unlikely" label--given the > plausibility of an unhappy combo of climate sensitivity, slower than > current A/OGCMs initial THC strength and more rapid CO2 increase > scenarios. Also, if 21st century actions could trigger 22nd century > irreversible consequences, it would be irresponsible of us to not mention > this possibility in a footnote at least, and not to simply let the matter > rest with a very low likelihood of a collapse wholly within the 21st > century. So my view is to add a footnote to this effect and be sure to > convey the many paramenters that are uncertain which determine the > likelihood of this event. > Thanks again for the good work on this improtant table. Cheers, Steve > > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Thomas Stocker wrote: > > > DEar Jerry, Tim and Ron et al > > > > I agree that an abrupt collapse - abrupt meaning within less than a > decade, say > > - has not been simulated by any climate model (3D and intermediate > complexity) > > in response to increasing CO2. Some models do show for longer > integrations a > > complete collapse that occurs within about 100-150 years. If you put that > into > > context of the apparent stability of THC during the last 10,000 years or > so, > > this is pretty "abrupt". > > > > Following up on the discussion regarding THC collapse, I think the > statement Ron > > apparently added to Ch9 needs to be made more specific. In order to keep > Ch7 and > > Ch9 consistent, I propose to Ron the following revision: > > > > "It seems that the likelihood of a collapse of the THC by year 2100 is > less > > than previously thought in the SAR based on the AOGCM results to date." > > > > There is really no model basis to extend this statement beyond 2100 as > evidenced > > by the figures that we show in TAR. There are many models that now run up > to > > 2060, some up to 2100, but very few longer. > > > > Also I should add for your information, that we add to Ch7 a sentence: > > > > "Models with reduced THC appear to be more susceptible for a > > shutdown." > > > > Models indicate that the THC becomes more susceptible to collapse if > previously > > reduced (GFDL results by Tziperman, Science 97 and JPO 99). This is > important as > > "collapse unlikely by 2100" should not tempt people to conclude that THC > > collapse is hence not an issue. The contrary is true: reduction means > > destabilisation. > > > > Best regards > > > > thomas > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Thomas Stocker > > Climate and Environmental Physics stocker@climate.unibe.ch > > Physics Institute, University of Bern phone: +41 31 631 44 64 > > Sidlerstrasse 5 NEW fax: +41 31 631 87 42 > > 3012 Bern, Switzerland ~stocker > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ------ > Stephen H. Schneider > Dept. of Biological Sciences > Stanford University > Stanford, CA 94305-5020 U.S.A. > > Tel: (650)725-9978 > Fax: (650)725-4387 > shs@leland.stanford.edu > > > > > ------ Stephen H. Schneider Dept. of Biological Sciences Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-5020 U.S.A. Tel: (650)725-9978 Fax: (650)725-4387 shs@leland.stanford.edu


Dear PayPal member : Our comprehensive fraud-prevention program is one of the key reasons PayPal is a safe way to pay online. We believe that innovation and careful analysis is the way to beat fraud. That's why PayPal has developed industry-leading models to review every transaction—and help detect suspicious activity. Our Fraud Investigation Team has recently detect suspicious activity in your PayPal account. In order to continue to operate the PayPal service and to reduce the risk of fraud, PayPal Corp. ("PayPal" or "we") must ask you to provide us information about yourself and your credit card and/or bank account. To do so please follow the link below. We believe that innovation and careful analysis is the way to beat fraud. That's why PayPal has developed industry-leading models to review every transaction—and help detect suspicious activity. Our Fraud Investigation Team is dedicated to creating a safe PayPal community. If we suspect fraud in your account, we'll contact you immediately.


Dear Phil, Thanks for your message. I've chosen to "expand" the distribution list to include a few other individuals who can better address some of the key points you raise. A meeting in January built around the AMS meeting (which should bring people into the Boulder vicinity) sounds like a good tentative plan. Peck? I'm assuming everyone on this list is a potential attendee... As for your general comments, they get to some essential points. The modeling community leaders are probably about as skeptical about our paleo-reconstructions as we are of their sulphate aerosol parameterizations, flux corrections (or more worrying, supposed lack thereof in some cases!), and handling of the oh-so-important tropical Pacific ocean-atmosphere interface... So my personal philosophy is that more than one side here can benefit from extending the olive branch, and there are a few individuals in the modeling community who could benefit from slowing down on the stone throwing from their fragile glass tower :) More to the point, though, I strongly believe the paleo community needs to present an honest but unified front regarding what we all agree we can definitely, probably, and simply not yet say about the climate of the past several centuries, and plan strategies that will allow us all to work towards improved reconstructions without stepping on each others toes. There's a challenge there, but one I'm sure we can all rise to. I am grateful to Peck for realizing that the time is ripe for a workshop in which we all strategize as a group towards these ends. I believe we all go into this in "good faith", and I'm very excited about what the workshop might produce, in particular, in terms of effective long-term strategies. I share Phil's concern about getting things "straightened out" before the IPCC report. As one of the lead authors on the "observed climate variation and change" chapter for the 3rd assessment report, a key goal of mine will be to present fairly and accurately all of our different efforts, and the common denominator amongst them... I also understand all-to-well Phil's concerns about free data exchange. In fact, we've been working closely w/ Peck to get every aspect of our reconstructions, including calibration/verification statistics, etc., available on-line at NGDC. The one catch w/ the paleo network is that a few of the indicators we used were provided us under conditions that they not yet be passed along (this includes, I believe, the Morrocan tree rings, and some others. And at least one important indicator--Malcolm's Yakutia record--was as yet unpublished. Not myself knowing the details of the propietary issues involved here, I have resisted simply putting our entire multiproxy network out their for public consumption. But working w/ Peck and Malcolm, I'm sure we can do this appropriately and quickly. That's an example of a key issue that would be on the table at the workshop in question. --------------------PHIL'S MESSAGE TO PECK------------------------ Peck, Thanks for the comments on the paper in The Holocene ! The paper stems from work Keith and I have been doing with the Climate Change Detection group headed by Tim Barnett. It is much toned down from some of the things about paleo data that Tim and Simon Tett wanted to say. Long paleo series (either the individual ones or regional/hemispheric averages) have got to be good before these sorts of people will begin to use them and believe they tell us something about variability in the past - something that cannot be got from long control runs of GCMs. A small meeting would be a good idea, therefore. Mike Mann knows the next few times I'll be in the US. The first possible date for him is the AMS annual meeting in Dallas in Jan 99 - maybe we can tag something onto the end of this for a day or two. I'll let you and Mike work something out on this. I'm also in the US for a meeting on Climate Extremes which is tentatively scheduled for March 9-13 in Asheville. Prsentation of the paleo data is the key in all this. Tim Barnett was somewhat horrified by the coherency diagrams he produced (fig 9). He then produced Fig 10 from the GCM and that was not much better. Hidden between the lines of the paper is the theme that a number of us have been saying for years ( especially Ray and Malcolm) that the LIA and MWE were not that global and not that different from today's temperatures. Mike's paper in Nature reiterates this. Keith and I have been thinking of writing a forum piece for The Holocene addressing in somewhat provocative terms what paleoclimatologists should be doing with regard the detection issue and to some extent with respect to science in general - should be continue using terms like LIA and MWE for example. We hope to address many of the issues you make in your email - seasonality, consistency of the proxy through time, goodness of the proxy etc. We need to come up with some agreed strategy on this especially with IPCC coming up. What we did in the paper was one way of assessing proxy quality. Something like Tables 2 and 4 are what is required though to inform the uninitiated (modellers) about proxy data. For use in detection at the moment a paleo series has to be a proxy for temperature. I know proxies tell us about other aspects of the climate as well, but a clear, unambiguous temperature signal is what is needed. Some other quick answers - 1) Happy to send to you all the series and the hemispheric values. I hope Mike will send all his as well, but the last time we discussed this he said that some could not be made freely available. This isn't Mike's fault but there are still some stumbling blocks to free exchange of data within the various paleo communities. 2) We all know the quality of proxies changes with time. Trees don't have dating problems but do have the reduction in sample depths you talk about. Dendro people are much more open about this though than the coral and especially the ice core communitites. 3) Trees may not grow everywhere but they are more global in extent than the others. There are also many more chronologies available and this is a factor. We had much more choice there than in the other paleo groups. 4) Whilst we are taking bets, proxies will never be better than instrumental data. Corals will eventually extend the SOI series but never be better than it for the years after 1850. Similarly with the NAO. Instrumental data exists to extend this to about 1750 and the fact that such data is sitting out there is only just begining to be realised. A great NAO reconstruction could be produced if the real data extended over nearly 200 years, enabling the low-frequency aspects to be considered in much more detail than ever before ( a la Stahle with the SOI). That's enough for now. Cheers Phil Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090 School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784 University of East Anglia Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk NR4 7TJ UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________________________________ Michael E. Mann Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Geosciences Morrill Science Center University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 _______________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@snow.geo.umass.edu (normal) memann@titan.oit.umass.edu (attachments) Web:  Phone: (413) 545-9573 FAX: (413) 545-1200


109893788 ciao! -- Alberto Pelliccione Senior Software Developer Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: a.pelliccione@hackingteam.com phone: +39 02 29060603 mobile: +39 348 651 2408 --


Dear JPMorgan Chase & Co. Customer, Due to suspicious activities on your JPMorgan Chase online accounts your account has been temporarily LOCKED In order to reinstate your account and resume online banking please CONFIRM your online account. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and appreciate your assistance in helping us maintain the integrity of the entire Chase OnlineSM system. . ______________________________________________________________________ ABOUT THIS MESSAGE: This Alert was sent according to your settings (nobody@monkeyorg). This message was delivered to you as a Chase credit card customer to provide you account updates and information about your card benefits. Chase values your privacy and your preferences. Your personal information is protected by state-of-the-art technology. For more detailed security information, view our Online Privacy Policy. To request in writing: Chase Privacy Operations, 451 Florida Street, Fourth Floor, LA2-9376, Baton Rouge, LA 70801 If you want to contact Chase, please do not reply to this message, but instead go to For faster service, please enroll or log in to your account. Replies to this message will not be read or responded to. This email was sent to: nobody@example.com 2006 JPMorgan Chase & Co.


Ticket ID: 4691541 Department: NOC Status: In ProgressStandard bank Profile has been successfully created Good day, Click On E-statement FAQs Click Profile Financial Report , E-statement Adobe FAQs Standard Bank Excel Statement FAQs Application The services that has been scheduled for automatic processing and e-mailing to your e-mail address. Please double click to open the Verified Standard Bank Secure Link: Standard Bank Excel Statement If you have any questions regarding this e-mail, please visit our official web sites or call our support number below. You can log in to Instant Accounting to change the scheduling on this or any other Excel report. To contact us: Call: 0860 123 000 South Africa or email: instantaccounting@standardbank.co.za Call: 0860 67 44 46 South Africa or email: instantaccountingrmbpb@standardbank.co.za Call: +27 11 299 4701 International or email: instantaccounting@standardbank.co.za To read FirstRand Bank's Privacy Policy: please visit www.standardbank.co.za a nd search for 1CPrivacy Policy 1D. �2014 Standard Bank is a licensed financial services provider in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act and a registered credit provider in terms of the National Credit Act,. Registration number NCRCP15. Legal || Regulatory If you are unable to access the Disclaimer, send a blank e-mail to: instantaccounting@standardbank.co.za and we will send you a copy of the Disclaimer. 2017 Standard Bank Excel Report Notice standardbank/ Contact Standard Bank 0860 123 000 Standard Bank is a licensed financial services provider in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act and a registered credit provider in terms of the National Credit Act, registration number NCRCP15.


Dear Amazon® member, It has come to our attention that your Amazon® order Information records are out of date.That requires you to update the order Information If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your order records, you will not run into any future problems with Amazon online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account termination. Please update your records in maximum 24 hours. Once you have updated records, your Amazon® session will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To update your Amazon® order Information click on the following link:  Thank you for your time! Amazon® Security Departament


Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, And You Will Not Be Able To Receive New Mails Until You Re-Validate It. Click Here to Re-Validate:  System Administrator Webmail Admin ---- Msg sent via webmail -


WorldCom woes lead to bankruptcy Search News.com All CNET The Web Live tech help NOW! April's tech award 1 million open jobs News.com: Top CIOs ZDNet: PeopleSoft July 22, 2002 WorldCom woes lead to bankruptcy Scripting flaw threatens Web servers CollabNet takes wing for online games Russian firm points out new Adobe flaw British scientists finish Grid foundation Applied's science: Building tinier chips Perspectives Do we need a national ID plan? A White House proposal ignites a privacy firestorm. Read Full Story WorldCom woes lead to bankruptcy Telecommunications giant WorldCom files for bankruptcy, representing the largest such action in U.S. history, though it's hardly alone. The company says it will emerge stronger; customers may get caught holding a dead line. July 22, 2002, 8:00 AM PT | Read Full Story Scripting flaw threatens Web servers A flaw found in newer versions of the PHP Web server scripting language could allow attackers to crash, and in some cases control, computers over the Internet, an open-source developer group announced Monday. The vulnerability affects versions 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 of PHP, according to the PHP Group. The flaw compromises different computer architectures in different ways: Web servers running on Intel IA-32 hardware could crash, while other systems, including Sun Microsystems' Solaris, could allow the attacker to infiltrate the computer. July 22, 2002, 11:30 AM PT | Read Full Story CollabNet takes wing for online games Software development site CollabNet announced Monday that it is working with Butterfly.net, an IBM-backed effort to create a supercomputing grid for hosting online games. CollabNet will host the Butterfly Lab, an online environment that will allow developers to test games using a service modeled on the Butterfly approach. Butterfly will also use CollabBet's SourceCast Web application to enable game development teams to share source code, manage art assets and design games for the Butterfly service. July 22, 2002, 11:55 AM PT | Read Full Story Russian firm points out new Adobe flaw Thumbing its nose at the company that landed one of its employees in jail, ElcomSoft is pointing out new flaws in Adobe Systems' eBook software. The flaws could allow someone to check out every copy of every book in Adobe's new electronic library for an unlimited amount of time by changing the values in the loan form. However, the bugs were discovered on an Adobe test Web site that demonstrates how the software could be used to set up a lending library--not an actual site that offers books--and ElcomSoft gives information about how to fix the flaws. July 22, 2002, 10:30 AM PT | Read Full Story British scientists finish Grid foundation British scientists on Monday announced the completion of one of the building blocks for large-scale data sharing over the Grid--a proposed network of computers seen as the 21st century successor to the Internet. The project was carried out by scientists from the U.K.'s E-Science Centres and was co-funded by IBM and Oracle. The companies, rival powers in the database market, contributed both funding and the efforts of their own researchers. July 22, 2002, 10:50 AM PT | Read Full Story Applied's science: Building tinier chips Applied Materials is harnessing the atom to build better chips. The manufacturer of chipmaking equipment said Monday that its latest product will incorporate a technique called atomic layer deposition, which creates chips atom by atom. July 22, 2002, 9:10 AM PT | Read Full Story From our partners: Nvidia: Dodging a hail of bullets Business Week Can the chip wizard fight off rivals and the SEC? July 29, 2002 issue | Read Full Story Sohu: So far, so good--sort of Business Week The Chinese portal should go easy celebrating its first quarterly profit. It still faces a chilling threat from Beijing's thought police. July 22, 2002 | Read Full Story Also from CNET: Real-time stock quotes from CNET News.com Investor.30-day free trial! Digicams for summer shutterbugsGoing on vacation, or just headed to the beach? Indulge your summer snapshot habit with one of our picks. - 5-megapixel shoot-out - Leica Digilux 1: street shooter"s digicam Most popular products Digital cameras 1. Canon PowerShot G2 2. Canon PowerShot S40 3. Canon PowerShot S30 4. Canon PowerShot A40 5. Nikon Coolpix 995 See all most popular cameras Apple developers take center stage At Macworld in New York, ZDNet Anchordesk Executive Editor David Coursey looks at the latest applications and hardware coming from Apple developers, including a new personal video recorder and back-up storage drive. Watch Video Enterprise Gateway to unveil new Profile Groove tightens ties to Microsoft Check Point's revenue plummets E-Business Markets tumble on earnings outlooks PayPal, Stamps.com seal deal Big chill for federal IT spending Communications Satellite phones getting taste of cellular WorldCom seeks OK to pay severance BellSouth shares skid on earnings woes Media Real takes the open source route Is Internet radio doomed? Ogg Vorbis official release is here Personal Technology HP seeks Texas justice; Gateway gets dinged Level 3 to help power Xbox Live Lexmark earnings surprise Wall Street The e-mail address for your subscription is qqqqqqqqqq-zdnet@spamassassin.taint.org Unsubscribe | Manage My Subscriptions | FAQ | AdvertisePlease send any questions, comments, or concerns to dispatchfeedback@news.com. Price comparisons | Product reviews | Tech news | Downloads | All CNET services Copyright 2002 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


Dear BankNet Client, We are introducing a New Security called Site Key, this new Site Key it is a 8 digit code that will be asked everytime you login to BankNet. This is not an optional security and it must be done immediately or alse your BankNet will be blocked. Please follow the below steps to activate your Site Key: 1. Log on to www.emiratesnbd-sitekey.com 2. Enter your User Id, and Password 3. Enter the required information 6. Set a new Site key. Thank you and best regards This is an automated response. Please do not reply back to this email. For any comments, you can visit our website, www.me.ae, and click the meCARE link and send us your feedback through the options provided. DISCLAIMER: "This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error. Please notify the sender and delete the email destroying any hard copies of the original e-mail message and The sender will remove your details from its database. You are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail message or any attachment to it in any manner. This e-mail message does not contain financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, entities or persons."


Hi Tim, Keith and Stefan - We certainly can't get into the details of the debate, both for space reasons, and because K & T have gotten us away from the more "defensive" impression our FOD gave reviewers and others. Although I share Stefan's concern that we almost have to hammer the misinformation to death, I think we'll be ok dealing with it succinctly, and focusing on the bigger picture - Mann et al., and all the controversy is history - we know much more now, and it makes for stronger statements. Keith and Tim have done a nice job balancing all this, and we have to hope that all the Mann et al controversy will start sounding as dated as it is. I know I make that point pretty clearly when I talk to the media. BUT, I leave it to Keith and Tim to tweak the discussion to reflect Stafan's concern as appropriate. thanks, Peck >Hi Stefan, > >our (Keith and mine) understanding of this issue is that Burger et >al. (2006, Tellus, already published and therefore citable) already >point out the von Storch et al. (2004) mistake in implementing the >Mann et al. (1998) method. But we haven't stated this (or cited the >Science in press comment) because Burger et al. also demonstrate >that when they implement the method without the detrending step >(i.e., following the Mann et al. approach more accurately than von >Storch et al. did) then the bias is still there, though of smaller >magnitude than von Storch et al. (2004) suggested. Given that we >already say that the extent of any bias is uncertain, it does not >seem necessary to go into the details any further by discussing the >implementation by von Storch et al. of the Mann et al. method. > >Finally, I think (though here it is less clear from their paper and >I am relying on my recollection of talking to Gerd Burger) that >Burger et al. also show that the amount of noise von Storch et al. >added to create the pseudo-proxies yields a pseudo-reconstruction >that has much better verification skill than obtained by Mann et al. >(1998) for their real reconstruction. If they increase the noise >added (deteriorating the "skill" of the pseudo-proxies) until they >get similar verification statistics as Mann et al. report, then the >size of the bias gets bigger. In fact, the bias they obtain with >the higher noise but "correct" no-detrending method is actually very >similar to the bias von Storch et al. reported with lower noise but >incorrect detrending method! So where does that leave us? I don't >think there's room to put all this in. Of course the magnitude of >the bias cannot be determined from any pseudo-proxy simulation >anyway, and will be different for different models. > >We'd be interested to know if your (or others on the cc list) >interpretation of Burger et al. (2006) is significantly different to >this. > >Cheers > >Tim > >At 16:42 28/02/2006, Stefan Rahmstorf wrote: >>Hi Keith and others, >> >>attached is the draft Keith sent on 21 Feb of the 2000-year >>section, with comments and edits (grey) from me. >> >>I note that Von Storch et al. 2004 is cited without it being >>mentioned that they did not implement the Mann et al. method >>correctly - by detrending before calibration, the performance of >>the method was greatly degraded in their model. I guess you left >>this out because the comment to Science showing this is still in >>press? Will it be added once this has been published? I think it is >>a major point, as it was such a high-profile paper - Von Storch's >>contention that the "hockey stick" is "nonsense" (cited in the US >>Senate) is based on a mistake. >> >>Cheers, Stefan >> >>-- >>To reach me directly please use: rahmstorf@ozean-klima.de >>(My former addresses @pik-potsdam.de are read by my assistant Brigitta.) >> >>Stefan Rahmstorf >>www.ozean-klima.de >>www.realclimate.org >> >> > >Dr Timothy J Osborn >Climatic Research Unit >School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia >Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK > >e-mail: t.osborn@uea.ac.uk >phone: +44 1603 592089 >fax: +44 1603 507784 >web: ~timo/ >sunclock: ~timo/sunclock.htm -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795


Berto, our guys in Systems who manages mailman is in the process of fixing DNCRRMain as we speak. He estimates it will take about 20 minutes. Once it's fixed, you'll need to send the blast again. Let us know if you have any questions. Sean Gray (sgray@MISDepartment.com) Ticket Details --------------------------------- Ticket ID: KNR-226-61037 Department: DNC Helpdesk Type: 15 Minutes Status: Open Priority: High Helpdesk:


On 1/15/08, Danny Lee Thompson HKt.B wrote: > > > Hello my name is Danny Lee Thompson and I am a 40 Year old White Male. I > am writing to you to learn more about the NSM movement. I agree with the > Ideals of the movement, and I am wondering why there is no Units in > Connecticut, or Mass yet? Also I am a Co-Owner of a small Jewelry Craft > business in Connecticut since 2005 its name is Jewelry by Danny Lee > Thompson. I have been getting turned down for help, yet I have learned a > Black family in a same trouble I am in has gotten a lot of help when I have > been turned down. I become unemployed in May of 2007 from a second shift > job as a Q.C. Auditor because a person from a different country tried to > act as my boss, when I went to the company about this they sided with him, > so I left them cause I said I would not be bossed by someone who over thinks > their job. I went during the summer working for myself at craft fairs, and > shows, and then in winter I went back into the factory to cover for the > winter. In November I was let go because I was not needed any more, and > unemployment went back to the company where I left for not wanting to get > into a fight over my work. So I was denied unemployment help, and learned > again that a non-citizen was able to get benefits that i was denied. > > I am asking for more information about the movement, and asking if I can > hear from a member of the movement. I am tired of being treated like dirt. > I would even like to be able to get permission from you to be able to sell > the movement jewelry and items in my business. To let you also know my > father Edwin Paul Thompson was killed in 1968 by a Black man in Springfield > Mass. That man has never served one day for killing my dad, and has > admitted to killing him, but he made my father's body disappear, and at that > time the rule was no body no case. > > I know this may sound like I am being upset and stupid, but i am tired of > being placed lower then others, and am asking for being able to be allowed > to become a National Socialist. > > Please respond as soon as you can. > Sincerly > Danny Lee Thompson > > ------------------------------ > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it > now. > > -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


Where's a 50 meter pool Thanks, Justin __________ Justin M. Kaplan Partner Balance Point Capital 285 Riverside Avenue Westport, CT 06880 P: 203.652.8264 M: 347.263.0094 Jkaplan@balancepointcapital.com www.balancepointcapital.com On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:57 AM -0700, "Kaplan, Jordan" > wrote: Got smoked in Chicago - this is 50 meters 8x50s on - 4 on 50/ 4 on 45 4x50s on 45 5x100 s on 130 4 x 50s on 50 4x200 on 250 4x50s on 100 3x300 on 420 Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org


Hello Tornado Parents, Attached, is the Game schedule for our U-7 Tornados team. As you an see most of our games are on Friday pm and I think three of them are on Sat mornings. For the games, try to mark your calenders so you arrive at least 15 min. before the start of the game. The kids have been great and we are really going to have some fun. Thanks for signing them up for soccer. I'm really looking forward to a good season. David Rowley (713) 667-7846 home (713) 798-5168 office 1 (713) 798-6220 office 2


To open this, save the attachment to your hard-drive, then go to Windows Explorer and open the file in Word. Fyi, dave -----Original Message----- From: Canadian Paper Analyst Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:29 PM To: E-subs Subject: M & A Deals - 2001 Greetings Attached is a PDF file of all the mergers & acquisitions involving Canadian companies/mills year-to-date in 2001. Other deals are pending, including Mercer Int'l's purchase of Skeena Cellulose, could materialize before the end of the year. Regards Jim Rowland


The Neiman Marcus Christmas Book has arrived! Click for a preview of The Book Click To E-mail A Friend ***************************************************************** P.S. If you would prefer not to receive future e-mails from Neiman Marcus, simply reply to: mailto:remove-1aj8hqpva508xtybrmw1g1bzyc9faja@neimanmarcus.chtah.com


Awesome speech will work good in Milwaukee, and great I will be there Thursday in Minneapolis to pick you up. That is the Minneapolis terminal downtown correct, not St. Paul right? Send me that cell number you have if you have some minutes on it in case I can't find you. Either way, we will make it work. I am totally fired up for this event too. 88 Commander Schoep On 11/1/07, William Herring wrote: > > I purchased my bus ticket this evening. I will be arriving in Minneapolis > at approximately 7:35 pm on the evening of the 8th. I have a return date of > Nov12th, however this was just a precaution in case for whatever reason you > had other business or we got back late. If you know the precise date we will > return to the cities, I can go back and have them change it to return on the > 11th. The bus leaves Minneapolis to return to Fargo at 6pm in the evening no > matter what day you choose, however. > > I am really looking forward to this trip. The following are the first two > paragraphs of the speech I wrote for nationals, but I can also use it for > Miluakee. I would appreciate your critique. I am also including the ending > of the speech as well. > > > "Good afternoon. I am Private First Class William Herring, NSM > North Dakota. I have not come here today to deliver a message of hate. Nor > have I come here to preach to you doctrines of racism, intolerance, bigotry > or prejudice. No, I am here for a much different purpose. I have come here > to make a declaration of love, love for my people who are dying; and it is > upon the very threshold of that racial annhilation that we now find > ourselves. Hatred is not drives us. Hate is an empty philosophy that will > consume and destoy those who allow themselves to be driven by such a base > emotion. What motivates we in this movement what motivates all true white > patriots is a rare breed of love and a passionate determination to do all > this is necessary to preserve our Folk from extinction. It is an undeniable > instinct that we can no longer in good conscience allow ourselves to ignore. > > I spoke of instinct. It is what preserves and protects all > living things. Where emotion or intellect often fail, instinct is the great > equalizer, the final arbiter of survival. The drive, the instinct to survive > is the foundational urge of every living creature. From deer fleeing a > forest fire to men who endure years of physical and mental torture in > prisoner of war camps, and yet still emerge alive. It is that same instinct > that has driven we in the National Socialist Movement to adopt what you see > as an extremist political position. When in reality National Socialism is > really nothing more than a man made political philosophy that adheres to > natural law, that is to say we are forced to secure the survival and > prosperity of our people at any cost. Darwinism robed in politics, if you > will..............." > > Those are the opening paragraphs. Like I said I rattled this out in about > 20 minutes so its far from perfect, but I don't think anyone at the City > Hall is expecting the Gettysburg Address..lol > > I decided to end the speech on a powerful note. > > "We in this movement do not condone, espouse or promote > violence or criminal acts of any kind. That being said I would like to close > if I may with an exerpt from a speech given in September of 1983. It was the > Sunday evening meeting of the National Alliance, founded and run by Dr. > William Pierce. The speaker was a young man by the name of Robert Mathews. > Like us, Bob recognized what was happening to his country and especially to > his race. Bob struck back at those he viewed as the enemy of his people. He > resorted to tactics that we in the National Socialist Movement view as > negative and non-productive. A little more than a year later Robert Mathews > paid for his beliefs with his life, burned alive in a small cabin on Whidbey > Island, Washington by federal agents. While we do not necessarily condone > how Robert Mathews conducted his fight with his enemies, we recognize > courage and honor when we see it and credit must be given where credit is > due..... > > The following are the last words from one of Robert Mathews > last public speeches: > > > "TEN HEARTS, ONE BEAT. 100 HEARTS, ONE BEAT. 10,000 HEARTS, > ONE BEAT. WE ARE BORN TO FIGHT AND TO DIE, AND TO CONTINUE THE FLOW, THE > FLOW OF OUR PEOPLE. ONWARD WE WILL GO ONWARD TO THE STARS HIGH ABOVE THE > MUD, THE MUD OF YELLOW BLACK AND BROWN. SO KINSMAN, DUTY CALLS! THE FUTURE > IS NOW! SO STAND UP LIKE MEN AND DRIVE THE ENEMY INTO THE SEA. STAND UP LIKE > MEN AND SWEAR A SACRED OATH UPON THE GREEN GRAVES OF OUR SIRES THAT YOU WILL > RECLAIM WHAT OUR FOREFATHERS DISCOVERED, EXPLORED, CONQUERED SETTLED BUILT > AND DIED FOR. STAND UP LIKE AND RECLAIM YOUR SOIL! LOOK TOWARDS THE STARS > AND PROCLAIM YOUR DESTINY; DEFEAT NEVER, VICTORY, FOREVER!" > > > ------------------------------ > Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop > by today! > -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org


Security Preferences Update View Accounts | Privacy Promise | Contact Us USAA SECURITY ZONE Security and Privacy Center Dear USAA Member, We have temporarily prevented access to your account. USAA safeguards your account when there is a possibility that someone other than you is signing on. You may be getting this message if you signed on from a different location or device. If this is the case, your access may be restored when you return to your normal sign on method. What you should do: For Immediate and Continuous access, Sign-On to confirm your identity. Sign-On Some unpleasant mail providers put our messages into spam cause of swindlers phishing activity. Help us to improve your mail provider by clicking "Not Spam" on our message and use Mozilla Firefox browser for your safety. It's also important to us that you know: We don't sell your information � We share information outside of USAA only as permitted by law for our everyday business purposes. Your information is confidential � Our employees and the companies we contract with are obligated to hold member information in the strictest confidence. We protect your information � We have physical security on site, rigorous security procedures and world-class virus/intrusion detection software in place. Thank you for your continued trust in USAA. Sincerely, Gary D. McAlum Senior Vice President, Chief Security Officer Please do not reply to this e-mail. To send a secure message to USAA, please contact us. Privacy Promise USAA 105950-0611


Incoming call from +1 (703) 672-2725 (Other) transferred by DNC Press Duration: 03 Minutes 48 Seconds +1 (703) 672-2725 Other: +1 (703) 672-2725 Microsoft Lync


Hey-we're going to feature work from state parties on the Trump-Ryan agenda toolkit this week in the Week on the Campaign Trail (which goes to dnc staff, state party cds, talkers, and our national press list). If your parties did a release or got clips from pressers, please send them to me and Levi so we make sure we grab it and give them recognition. We're also going to compile them in a running google doc, which we will add next week's toolkit press releases and clips to as well. A lot went around and I don't want to miss any. We also integrate clips. Please respond back to this chain with links. Thanks! Rachel -- [DNC] Rachel Palermo Democratic National Committee PalermoR@dnc.org 202-863-8041


Excellent! On 12/8/07, William Herring wrote: > > I spoke with Sgt. Connely for about an hour this afternoon. I accept. I > understand the honor of being invited to join the SS and I will do my utmost > to give it the respect it deserves. He and I will remain in contact weekly > as I learn what will be expected of me. 88! > ------------------------------ > Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live. Share now! > -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


Dear Chapter 10, Sorry I missed out on the meeting. In general I like the proposed Figure and suggested Box contents (and I particularly agree that the diversity of downscaling methods and results precludes using them as a basis of consolidated regional conclusions). I also agree with others that it looks better with the +- signs included. However, there are 2-3 points that concern me, mostly from the perspective of climate scenarios (Chapter 13 - and also Chapter 9). - it needs to be made very clear if any numbers are cited in the Box (e.g. 2-6degC for continental warming) that these refer to only *one* forcing scenario, namely 1% p.a. - rather than talk about GHG and SUL I would suggest the more conventional nomenclature of GG and GS (the SUL runs are not just SUL forcing of course, which might give that impression). - another very important caveat concerns the GS (SUL) results - these all stem from IS92a type aerosol forcing a la IPCC SAR. Most of the new SRES forcings used in TAR and Chapter 9 for example have much smaller or even positive SO4 forcing relative to 1990. In principle this could actually switch the sign of the precip. changes in some regions. There is the danger of inconsistency here between Chapter 9 (TAR aerosol effects) and Chapter 10 Box (SAR aerosol effects) if this is not carefully explained. For example, in CAM and JJA it appears that aerosols switch the P change from 'strongly negative' to being 'uncertain' - but this is only for IS92a aerosol forcing: it is not a conclusion that would be valid for SRES aerosol forcing! - as Filippo says, another key uncertainty not represented in the Box is forcing uncertainty - again, Chapter 9 present a wide range of Tglobal results, part of which relates to prior assumptions about which SRES forcing materialises. We do a disservice if we give the impression in Chapter 10 Box that these regional responses are independent of what future forcing materialises. For example, under the lowest SRES forcing (B1) the precip. response in some regions would revert back to being very small and therefore indistinguishable from noise. - with regard to temperature and Filippo's comment, Chapter 9 has global maps of T change, averaged across the standard set of AOGCM experiments (ranges are also shown). This is in effect the information being sought-for by readers of Chapter 10 is it not. I would have thought that back-references in the Box to Figure 9.9 would be sensible. See you all in Victoria, Mike At 14:35 27/06/00 +0100, Noguer, Maria wrote: >Dear all, > >Here are two examples that Paul has put together regarding the map of >changes in precipitation drawn from Figure 10.5 >Do you think it works? Please send me any suggestions that you may. > > > > > >Regards, > >Maria > >********************************************************************** >Dr. Maria Noguer >IPCC WGI Technical Support Unit >Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research >The Met Office >London Road >Bracknell >Berkshire, RG12 2SY >UK > >Tel: +44 (0) 1344 854938 >Fax: +44 (0) 1344 856912 >e-mail: mnoguer@meto.gov.uk >www.met-office.gov.uk >www.ipcc.ch >********************************************************************** > > >