First, the whole process is bound to remain rather cumbersome reflecting the need to maintain G20 “ownership” – i.e., to reflect the inherent diversity of its members and the rule of consensus used in its deliberations.
More importantly, the MAP has been conceived as an exercise with a medium to long term orientation, not as a platform for discussing national policy changes dictated by the evolution of G20 economies in the short term. Explicit discussion of exchange rates has been taboo, which is a serious limit.