Moreover, if the weak development of exports and investment during, above all, 2012 had not been counteracted by household consumption, then the latest slowdown in the Swedish economy would have been more pronounced. Households have become more optimistic over the last 12 months and this is reflected in higher housing prices, increased lending and increased consumption. They have been helped by the increase in their disposable incomes over a period of several years. Low interest rates have of course contributed to this development in the household sector. Turning to the labour market, employment has increased but unemployment is nevertheless higher than it was a year ago as the labour force has increased relatively quickly. This is partly due to an increase in those of working age in the population, but also to the government’s labour-market reforms, which are both factors of a structural nature. At the moment unemployment is approximately 8 per cent and with the Riksbank’s current forecast we are approaching the interval of 5 to 7.5 per cent within which the Riksbank believes the long-run sustainable rate of unemployment lies.1 If we look at the situation in different sectors we can see that employment has increased in the service sector while the weak demand for Swedish industrial products is in part responsible for the weak development of employment in the manufacturing industry.
It is true that the opinions on the optimal level and even on the relevance of this factor for successfully joining a currency union are quite diverse. However, to attain a certain degree of per capita income convergence before switching to the euro is essential, as a large convergence gap may complicate business cycle management in the absence of independent monetary policy. But even the countries that are already euro area members should continue to increase their level of real convergence. In my opinion, the direction of the real convergence process and its sustainability and smoothness are just as important as its degree. Romania has certainly come a long way in terms of economic convergence, a process whose inception is tied to the prospects of EU membership, witnessing a significant increase in per capita GDP as a share of the euro area average (based on PPS), from 31.7 percent in 2005 to 58.6 percent in 2017. Peer countries recorded a similar trend: Bulgaria went from about 33 to 47 percent, while the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland, which started from a more advanced level, added 9 to 20 percentage points to the same indicator during 2005–2017. However, this process is still far from completion in these non-euro New Member States. A smooth convergence path requires a combination of prudent macroeconomic policies (be they monetary, fiscal or macroprudential), even though in practice it is difficult to build support for such policies.