In my view, it should only be possible to neglect price stability and highest sustainable employment for a limited period if there are clear signs of problems with financial stability, if there are no means of addressing these problems without setting aside price stability and highest sustainable employment and if it can be credibly demonstrated that another, for example a higher, repo-rate path would lead to better target fulfilment for inflation and unemployment in the longer run. This last condition is important. The government bill that contained the proposal for the Sveriges Riksbank Act states namely that the policy rate may only be used to prevent a financial crisis if such a crisis threatens the price stability objective. In my opinion, there are no clear signs of problems with financial stability at present, there is no lack of means to maintain financial stability and if necessary to limit growth in mortgage  1  Sveriges Riksbank Act 1983:1385 and Government Bill 1997/98:40. BIS central bankers’ speeches  1  lending, and nor is there any theoretical or empirical support for the view that a low policy rate would lead to imbalances in Sweden. If anything, a lower policy rate might instead mean that the banks have less incentive to seek short-term funding in foreign currency and thus the risks linked to this funding will decline. If the Riksbank succeeds in stabilising inflation around the target and unemployment around a sustainable rate, average inflation should be in line with the target over a longer period of time.
Given these factors, I entered a reservation against the decision, preferring a much lower repo-rate path than the one proposed by the majority. At the next monetary policy meeting in July, there will be a new assessment, with new four-panel figures. 5  So-called mean squared gaps are also shown, although they are not needed in this case to judge which of the alternative repo-rate paths leads to the best target attainment. 4  BIS central bankers’ speeches  Objections to monetary policy focusing on inflation and unemployment The Sveriges Riksbank Act, the government bill proposing it and economic analysis thus all provide strong support, in my opinion, for monetary policy aiming to stabilise inflation around the target and unemployment around a long-run sustainable rate. At the same time, it is clear that the majority of Executive Board members have conducted a monetary policy that aims to do something other than this. As I discuss in detail in Svensson (2011), the majority of the Executive Board began to raise the repo rate in July 2010, despite the forecast for CPIF inflation being below the target and the forecast for unemployment being above any reasonable long-run sustainable rate. In recent years, according to the forecasts made at the time of each monetary policy meeting, a lower repo-rate path than the one chosen by the majority would have led to better target fulfilment for both inflation and unemployment.