This means that enhanced information disclosure required by Basle II, could be problematic if not supported by a proper public understanding. That’s why I feel a bit concerned about the effectiveness and appropriateness of an immediate implementation of Basle II. Therefore a more gradual approach may be necessary. This approach could take the form of an interim standard between Basel I and Basel II that could offer banks in emerging market economies some of the benefits of Basel II without having to face a prohibitive cost. This means that Basel II adoption should not be made mandatory in financial assessments (of WB, IMF for example) and countries should be left with the option to keep Basel I. EU banking directives are mandatory for our countries that opt to join EU. As Basel II elements are embedded in EU Directives, and as our countries are making progress toward integration in the EU, we shall be faced with the challenges of Basle II implementation. I’d like to point out three challenges in particular. Albania as many other East European Countries host a considerable number of foreign banks. These consist mostly of branches or subsidiaries of banks from EU countries which eventually may have to implement the new system including its most advanced elements if their head offices decide to adopt it throughout the network for consistency and competitiveness reasons.
0 129 345 678989 85    8 995 $ !53)6(8!)))6!5878*)!67869)4 ,2 )96 5)94 989)!-8-6-96./9""5#4 58/#!584 "65#684 5758+!94("!+ 0 23))986!65869)61 $ 3  4 4 4  4 4 4  0 0  0 0 0  1 1 1  0  1