Answers from an agent-based model’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 50: 144-154 Knight, F (1921), ‘Risk, uncertainty and profit’, Hart, Schaffner and Marx; Houghton Mifflin Co Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL (2013), ‘Record simulations conducted on Lawrence Livermore supercomputer’, Web: https://wwwllnlgov/news/record-simulations-conducted-lawrence-livermoresupercomputer Liu, J, and Ashton, P (1995), ‘Individual-based simulation models for forest succession and management’, Forest Ecology and Management 731: 157-175 Lucas, R (1976), ‘Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique’, In Brunner, K; Meltzer, A The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1 New York: American Elsevier pp 19–46 ISBN 0-444-11007-0 Lucas, R (2009), ‘In defence of the dismal science’, article in The Economist, available at: http://wwweconomistcom/node/14165405 Macy, M W, and Willer, R (2002), ‘From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling’, Annual review of sociology, 143-166 Madenjian, C P et al (1993), ‘Accumulation of PCBs by lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush),: an individual-based model approach’, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 501: 97-109  41  All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/default.aspx  41  Manheimer, W M, Lampe, M, and Joyce, G (1997), ‘Langevin representation of Coulomb collisions in PIC simulations’, Journal of Computational Physics,138(2), 563-584 Mansury, Y et al (2002), ‘Emerging patterns in tumor systems: simulating the dynamics of multicellular clusters with an agent-based spatial agglomeration model’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 2193: 343-370 McKinsey (2011), ‘Big Data: The next frontier for innovation, competition and productivity’, available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier-forinnovation Metropolis, N (1987), ‘The beginning of the monte carlo method’, Los Alamos Science, vol 15, no 584, pp 125–130 Metropolis, N and Ulam, S (1949), ‘The monte carlo method’, Journal of the American statistical association, vol 44, no 247, pp 335–341 Mirowski, P (1989), ‘More Heat than Light - Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics’, Cambridge University Press  Nagel, K, and Paczuski, M (1995), Emergent traffic jams Physical Review E,51(4), 2909 Orcutt, G H (1957), ‘A new type of socio-economic system’, The review of economics and statistics, pp 116–123 Pechoucek, M, and Sislak, D (2009), ‘Agent-based approach to free-flight planning, control, and simulation’, Intelligent Systems, IEEE 241: 14-17 Pelechano, N, Allbeck, J M and Badler, N I (2007), ‘Controlling individual agents in high-density crowd simulation’, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation Eurographics Association Penrose, R (1999), ‘The emperor’s new mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics’, Oxford University Press Popper, K (1934), ‘Logik der Forschung’, later translated as ‘The Logic of Scientific Discovery’, in English in 1959 Rauh, J, Schenk, T A and Schrödl, D (2012), ‘The simulated consumer-An agent-based approach to shopping behaviour’, Erdkunde: 13-25 42  All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/default.aspx  42  Romer, P (2016), ‘The trouble with macroeconomics’, available at: https://paulromernet/wpcontent/uploads/2016/09/WP-Troublepdf Rosato, A et al (1987), ‘Why the brazil nuts are on top: Size segregation of particulate matter by shaking’, Physical Review Letters, vol 58, no 10, p 1038 Sanchez, S M and Lucas, T W (2002), ‘Exploring the world of agent-based simulations: simple models, complex analyses: exploring the world of agent-based simulations: simple models, complex analyses’, in Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers, pp 116–126 Sargent, T (2001), ‘The Conquest of American Inflation’, Princeton University Press Sarkar, P (2000), ‘A brief history of cellular automata’, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol 32, no 1, pp 80–107 Schelling, T C (1969), ‘Models of segregation’, The American Economic Review, pp 488–493 Schelling, T C (1971), ‘Dynamic models of segregation’, Journal of mathematical sociology, vol 1, no 2, pp 143–186 Seow, K T, and Lee, D H (2010), ‘Performance of multiagent taxi dispatch on extended-runtime taxi availability: A simulation study’, Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on 111: 231-236 Shackle, G L S (1949), ‘Expectations in Economics’, Cambridge University Press Shackle, G L S (1972), ‘Epistemics and Economics’, ISBN: 978-1560005582 Shackle, G L S (1979), ‘Imagination and the Nature of Choice’, Edinburgh University Press Smets, F and Wouters, R (2003), ‘An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area’, Journal of the European Economic Association vol 1(5) Taleb, N (2014), ‘Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder’, Random House Trade Paperbacks Taylor, J (2016), ‘Policy stability and economic growth: Lessons from the Great Recession’, Institute of Economic Affairs  43  All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/default.aspx  43  Thorne, B C, Bailey, A M and Peirce, S M (2007), ‘Combining experiments with multi-cell agentbased modeling to study biological tissue patterning’, Briefings in bioinformatics, vol 8, no 4, pp 245–257 Tomita, M et al (1999), ‘E-cell: software environment for whole-cell simulation’, Bioinformatics, vol 15, no 1, pp 72–84 Turrell, A (2013), ‘Processes driving non-Maxwellian distributions in high energy density plasmas’ PhD thesis, Imperial College London Turrell, A et al (2015), ‘Ultrafast collisional ion heating by electrostatic shocks’, Nature communications, vol 6 Van Noordan, R (2015), ‘Interdisciplinary research by the numbers’, Nature vol 525, available at: http://wwwnaturecom/news/interdisciplinary-research-by-the-numbers-118349 Velupillai, K (2000), ‘Computable economics: the Arne Ryde memorial lectures’, vol 5 Oxford University Press Von Neumann, J (1951), ‘The general and logical theory of automata’, Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, pp 1–41 Von Neumann, J et al (1966), ‘Theory of self-reproducing automata’, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol 5, no 1, pp 3–14 Walras, L (1874), ‘Éléments d'économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale (Elements of Pure Economics, or the theory of social wealth, transl W Jaffé)’ Werner, F E et al (2001), ‘Spatially-explicit individual based modeling of marine populations: a review of the advances in the 1990s’, Sarsia, vol 86, no 6, pp 411–421 Wicksell, K (1918), Wicksell’s metaphor appears in a footnote to a review of Karl Petander’s ‘Goda och darliga tider’, published in Ekonomisk Tidskrift Wilson, D and Kirman, A (2016), ‘Complexity and Evolution’, MIT Press, ISBN: 978-0262337700 Woodcock, A et al (1988), ‘Cellular automata: a new method for battlefield simulation’, Signal, vol 42, pp 41–50  44  All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/default.aspx  44
Muhammad bin Ibrahim: Increasing payment efficiency to improve productivity Keynote address by Mr Muhammad bin Ibrahim, Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia), at the JomPAY’s Official Launch Event, Kuala Lumpur, 9 April 2015. *  *  *  In today’s challenging and rapidly evolving world, one must constantly find innovative and efficient ways to remain productive, or risk being left behind. As payments represent an indispensable activity for both individuals and businesses, increasing payment efficiency through the adoption of electronic payments (e-payments) will improve productivity and reduce the cost of transactions. At the macro level, the adoption of e-payments has the potential to enhance Malaysia’s overall economic efficiency and competitiveness. The benefits in terms of cost savings and efficiency gains from a successful migration to epayments are substantial. The launch of JomPAY today is part of the journey towards realization of these objectives. JomPAY provides greater efficiency, convenience and accessibility for the public to make bill payments. It also represents a conscious strategy that will contribute towards making the way we conduct financial transactions more efficient.