This was evident in several periods, the early nineties, the mid-nineties, and the outflows during 1997-1998, and in the current period following the de-leveraging by financial institutions in the advanced economies. In the early days of the Bank, policy actions were focused on the management of liquidity in the financial system through the imposition of statutory and liquidity reserve requirements,  BIS Review 12/2009  1  and through prescription of interest rates and portfolio restrictions, including ceilings on lending. Further progress and sophistication in the financial sector, the deepening of the financial markets and the growing influence of capital flows, resulted in the reliance on interest rate and other market-based instruments for monetary policy. Further, with the increased role of expectations, greater clarity in policy signals became desirable. Thus in 2004, the New Interest Rate Framework was implemented, in which the Overnight Policy Rate became the new policy rate, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the monetary transmission mechanism. The new framework has also served as a catalyst for efficient pricing of financial products and services by banking institutions. A key issue for monetary policy in an open economy like Malaysia has been in maintaining a flexible exchange rate and monetary independence in the face of increasingly large capital flows. To better manage surges in capital flows which have become more prevalent, the range of market-based instruments for monetary policy operations has been widened.
As a small, open economy, Sweden must in principle accept the international real interest rate as a given. Monetary policy is not able to affect the real interest rate to any great extent in the longer run, but it affects inflation and inflation expectations. In recent years, the IMF and other forecasters have revised down their forecasts for GDP on several occasions. If one looks at real interest rates, these began to fall even before the financial crisis and real interest rates have also fallen during periods of higher growth. Opinions differ with regard to the causes of this slowdown. The more pessimistic line talk about secular stagnation, where savings have increased and willingness to invest has declined as a result, for instance, of the composition of the population, of growing income gaps and weak technological innovations. This has in turn pushed down the interest rate level compatible with normal resource utilisation. The other more optimistic line say that remaining effects from the global financial crisis, such as deleveraging and increased political uncertainty, explain the slowdown but that these effects are transitory. 1  1  See Deputy Governor Henry Ohlsson’s speech on 18 March 2016 “Decision today, consequences far into the future”, for a longer review. BIS central bankers’ speeches  1  Lower real interest rates and inflation But it is not merely real interest rates that have fallen. In recent years, inflation has also shown a downward trend.