The first set of examples above highlighted the need to critically evaluate contingent exposures: without true stress correlations, tail events will not be captured properly. We believe more emphasis should be put on this by investors, analysts and regulators alike. Inevitably that means severe stress tests involving “jump to default” risk and the need to consider counterparty and market liquidity risks, not just issuer risks in these circumstances. Some banks have told us that they think they should not be required to hold capital and liquidity to deal with such extreme tail events – leaving the public sector to be the capital provider of last resort. But that leads directly to moral hazard and excessive risk-taking. Tail events seem to happen far more often than people assume15 and if the risks were properly acknowledged at the outset, many structures would be avoided or risks re-structured so as to limit losses in the event of tail risks. That has obvious implications for financial stability. A crucial component of this analysis is the proper design of stress tests. Obviously, scenarios have to be rather draconian in order to serve the purpose of challenging the “unthinkable”, but at the same time there are difficult decisions to be made, for example, in deciding how much bank capital (contingent or not) banks should hold – and what the probability is of it being wiped out.
Anita Angelovska-Bezoska: Macedonia’s current macroeconomic landscape and main challenges ahead Speech by Ms Anita Angelovska-Bezoska, Vice-Governor of the National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia, at the economic and financial dialogue on the Economic Reforms Programs on Western Balkan and Turkey, Brussels, 12 May 2015. *  *  *  Dear Ministers, Dear representatives of the European Commission, European Central Bank and Eurostat, At the beginning, let me express our gratitude to the European Central Bank, European Commission and Eurostat for their assessment of our Economic Reforms Program for the period 2015–2017. Let me mention that we appreciate very much this dialogue with the EU institutions and the overall feedback on our policies that we have received during the process and we believe that it is highly beneficial regarding our preparedness for joining the EU. At this point, I would like to address several important issues related to the current macroeconomic landscape of the Macedonian economy, as well as the main challenges ahead. The growth momentum was kept in 2014, with the real GDP growth accelerating to 3.8% p.a. As the external environment is not sufficiently “growth-conducive”, the strong performance of the domestic economy is explained by country-specific factors. Firstly, it is a reflection of the positive fundamental shifts, with growing foreign investments, mainly in the tradable sector.