He knows market risk. He worked on the trading floor,” Lannoo said. Lannoo and the shadow committee are critics of the accord, saying its overly complex nature may in fact heighten systemic threats by “capturing” regulators who would be required to take a more active role in banks' daily operations. Revolution in the making The new accord, now over five years in the making, represents a revolution for the banks who will adopt it. It leaves the first accord's simple dictates behind and offers a menu ranging from basic to complex. A second Basel Committee member, who also requested anonymity, said he had few doubts that the technocrat Caruana was the right choice for the job due to his expertise in such a complex field. “This is not new territory for Jaime,” he said. Indeed, some critics of the accord say a technocrat like Caruana is just who is needed to make sure that the byzantine draft is moulded into shape before being finalised by the end of this year. Caruana, a 51-year-old Valencian, studied telecommunications engineering and then qualified as a government economist. Those who have worked with him say he is a real technology fan, which given his studies is no surprise. The current controversy over the Basel reform is probably a source of discomfort for Caruana, who keeps himself to himself. “He is very simple and discreet, and shys away from limelight,” says a former colleague.
Øystein Olsen: The role of central banks – a Norwegian perspective Speech by Mr Øystein Olsen, Governor of Norges Bank (Central Bank of Norway), at the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF), London, 1 November 2016. * * * The charts can be found at the Central Bank of Norway’s website. INTRODUCTION Let me begin by thanking the OMFIF for the opportunity to speak to you today about the monetary policy regime in Norway. Like other central banks, the central bank of Norway is facing new challenges in a post-crisis environment of persistently low interest rates and uncertainty. Today I want to focus on how Norges Bank is responding to those challenges. Inflation targeting was formally introduced as a framework for monetary policy in Norway 15 years ago. As in other inflation-targeting countries, our inflation targeting regime has become more flexible over time. The operational target of monetary policy in Norway is annual consumer price inflation of close to 2.5% over time. However, according to the mandate, interest rate setting should seek to achieve a reasonable balance between inflation and capacity utilisation. Monetary policy should also be robust, taking uncertainty into account and seeking to avoid adverse outcomes. I will reurn to this topic in the following. The reasoning behind the policy rate decision taken by Norges Bank’s Executive Board is published in our Monetary Policy Report. The evolution of inflation targeting in Norway reflects the practical experience we have gained since it was introduced. The trade-offs have been challenging at times.