There was a net increase of about 6,900 jobs in financial services and FinTech in 2018, driven mainly by the banking and insurance industries.2 Over the last three years (2016–18), we saw an average of 4,900 financial services and FinTech jobs created on a net basis per year. This is above our ITM target of 4,000 net jobs growth in financial services and FinTech. 9 / 11  BIS central bankers' speeches  Hiring in the financial sector remains healthy so far this year and job growth is on track to meet the ITM target of 4,000. Sustaining this rate of job growth will not be easy in the face of technological change unless efforts are continually stepped up to upskill the workforce. As digitalisation and automation become more pervasive in the financial industry, jobs will be transformed. Some will inevitably be displaced. MAS, the financial industry, and our tripartite partners are taking this very seriously and undertaking a variety of measures to help prepare the financial sector workforce for a digital future. Last year, more than 20,000 individuals – or about one out of eight workers in the industry – went through MAS/IBF-supported upskilling programmes. Nineteen financial institutions have stepped forward and committed to re-skill close to 4,000 finance professionals and redeploy them in new or expanded roles over the next two years. Some 1,700 of them have already started this journey, and 800 have successfully transited into new roles. CONCLUSION Let me wrap up.
The financial crisis is a vivid reminder that there can be many risks to financial stability, and of the need for strong internal and external constraints on banks. Here, the “three pillars” of regulation, supervision, and bank culture must all play effective roles. Regulation establishes what is legally permissible for banks to do; supervision helps to reinforce those rules and evaluate whether the bank’s controls and other processes are conducive to safety and soundness; and bank culture sets the norms for what is appropriate behavior. 9 But, at the same time, these pillars are mutually reinforcing. Regulation and supervision, for example, attempt to address various market failures in banking that can contribute to excessive risk taking.10 Bank culture, in turn, helps establish norms in areas where regulation may be silent. In this way, regulation, supervision, and bank culture are complements, and deficiencies in any of these pillars can be problematic. For example, as we have seen in cases of unsafe or unethical behavior in recent years, strong regulation and supervision cannot substitute for deficiencies in bank culture—especially not on a timely basis. It is the public sector’s job to establish and enforce rules, but rules are inherently limited in their ability to constrain conduct and behavior. Much of our regulatory regime has been developed in response to financial problems that have arisen over time. Because regulation is typically reactive in this way, it may not always keep pace with the evolution of the financial system or the broader economic environment.