Feenstra, R C, Inklaar, R, and Timmer, M P (2013) “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table”, available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt. Ford, M (2015) “Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future” Basic Books. Freeman, R (2008), “Why do we work more than Keynes expected?”, Chapter 9 in Revisiting Keynes: Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren, MIT Press. Frey, C B, and Osborne, M A (2013) “The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation.”, available at: http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf. Heckman, J J, and Masterov, D V (2007) “The productivity argument for investing in young children” Review of Agricultural Economics, American Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 446–493, available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13016. Haldane, A G (2015) “Who owns a company?”, speech given at University of Edinburgh Corporate Finance Conference 22 May 2015, available at: www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/default.aspx Hills, S, Thomas, R and Dimsdale, N (2010) ‘The UK recession in context — what do three centuries of data tell us?’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2010 Q4. Hills, S, Thomas, R and Dimsdale, N (2015), ‘Three Centuries of Data – Version 2.2’, available here: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/research/Pages/onebank/datasets.aspx. IMF (2006) ‘How Has Globalisation Affected Inflation’, available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2006/01/pdf/c3.pdf. IMF (2013) ‘The dog that didn’t bark: Has inflation been muzzled or was it just sleeping?’, World Economic Outlook, April 2013. Katz, L F, and Margo, R A (2013), “Technical change and the relative demand for skilled labor: The united states in historical perspective.” National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w18752. Keynes, J M (1933) "Economic possibilities for our grandchildren."
This broader view of banking supervision, taking account of all its facets, translates into a number of provisions and notably introduces additional capital buffers (a capital conservation buffer, a countercyclical buffer and a buffer for systemically important financial institutions) in excess of the regulatory minimum. Basel III therefore represents a quantitative and also a qualitative leap. Given the magnitude of the changes to be made, Basel III has major repercussions on market participants, who must adapt to this new environment. These repercussions are both anticipated and desirable, but the potentially negative consequences of this reform must be kept to a minimum. In this respect, many associated risks were highlighted during its drafting and even more so recently, due to the current economic and financial difficulties. These included the risk of a rise in the cost of credit or of a credit crunch. Hence, the impact and stakes of Basel III must be carefully analysed and addressed. 2. The difficult economic environment stresses the importance of implementing Basel III in an appropriate manner but does not call into question the rationale of the reform  Without playing down the potential risks associated with the implementation of Basel III, to which the ACP pays close attention, I believe that this reform can be successfully implemented.