BIS central bankers’ speeches  1  Ladies and gentlemen, I note with gratitude that this workshop is designed to address supervisory standards in the non-bank and microfinance sector through three main themes, namely; i)  regulatory structures,  ii)  international trends and standards, and  iii)  integration of non-banks into the formal sector. These are all very important and topical issues and allow me to talk a little bit more about one of these themes – the development of regulatory structures. First, while there is a definite role for international standards for regulation of this sector, it is very important that they are implemented in a way that takes into account the individual circumstances of each country. Secondly, the standards we adopt should in the end not impede financial sector inclusion. We need to balance this in order to achieve our overall objective which is a sound and efficient financial system. Ladies and gentlemen, It is important not to assume that supervisory arrangements should be, or can be, the same in every country. They must be tailored to the individual circumstances of each country. As an example, what is appropriate for Namibia may be totally inappropriate for another country like Uganda, and vice versa. However, there are likely to be common characteristics that cut across and can enable us all to learn from each other.
Mr. Heikenstein discusses the Swedish financial crisis of the early 1990s Speech by the Deputy Governor of the Bank of Sweden, Mr. Lars Heikenstein, at a seminar arranged by the Swedish embassy held in Seoul, Korea on 15/7/98. Let me begin with a thank you to the organisers of this seminar. I am honoured to have the opportunity to share with you some experiences from the Swedish financial crisis in the early 1990s. 1. Introduction An IMF study from 1996 showed that in the past fifteen years, 132 of the Fund’s 182 member countries had experienced macroeconomic and/or financial crises. Today the figure is even higher. Crises are a recurring phenomenon. In spite of every effort to prevent them, I fear that crises will continue to occur. We should therefore use the opportunities to learn from each other, both in order to avoid making the same mistakes and to find the appropriate correctives sooner. Needless to say, there are no single “best solutions”. Crisis situations are always specific in some respects, not least with regard to their structural and political environment. Had they not been specific, they would probably never have occurred because they would have been “spotted” in advance. Having said this, however, there are a number of globally accepted “truths” about what constitutes a good response to crises. Discussions around crisis situations are usually divided into two parts: crisis prevention and crisis management. In this presentation I will be focusing on the latter.