Stefan Ingves: From ideas to implementation Remarks by Mr Stefan Ingves, Governor of the Sveriges Riksbank and Chairman of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, at the 8th High Level Meeting organised by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Financial Stability Institute and hosted by the South African Reserve Bank, Cape Town, 24 January 2013. As prepared for delivery. *  *  *  Introduction Let me begin today by thanking Josef Tošovský, Chairman of the Financial Stability Institute, for organising the latest in its series of High Level Meetings. The Basel Committee continues to view these events as extremely important, as they bring together senior policymakers and supervisors in a forum in which we can share thoughts on critical issues of the moment and reflect on long term challenges. Let me also extend my thanks to the South African Reserve Bank for its superb hospitality as the annual host of this High Level Meeting. Change and reform – new ideas and new ways of doing things – can be challenging in good times. When all is well, the perceived need is low and the costs – including opportunity costs – are difficult to justify. Even small ideas can be difficult to implement. Crises, on the other hand, provide a catalyst for fundamentally rethinking past practices. Many banks have learnt this as a painful lesson in recent years: when times were good, potential operational, risk management and cultural deficiencies were not examined closely enough.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the development of the local bond market is central to Government’s strategy for diversification of the economy for one key reason. All businesses, including state owned enterprises, require finance, covering both equity and debt, and ranging from short-term to long-term. In the absence of a properly functioning local bond market, those in need of capital and qualified enough have had to turn to international financial markets to finance their local projects with the attendant exchange rate risk. Similarly, those seeking a competitive return on their investments that also meet their maturity preferences but are unable to find these features locally, have always sought out alternative avenues offshore in foreign currency, thereby creating pressures in the foreign exchange market. Therefore, Government’s involvement in improving the local bond market has been deliberate. Ladies and Gentlemen, Government’s participation in improving the functioning of the local bond markets has seen the establishment of appropriate market infrastructure that facilitates cost-effective and secure trading, and a transparent price discovery process. Further, Government’s decision to bring to market longer term bonds in 2005 have proved to be positive and catalytic for the local bond market as this has resulted in an extended yield curve that has provided a benchmark for pricing longer dated security issues by the private sector and banking industry.