With the proliferation of financial products from basic risk protection to more sophisticated financial products for retirement and asset accumulation, it is important for consumers to have access to professional advice to help them work through the wide range of financial solutions which involve increasingly complex structures, and to avail themselves on solutions that will best suit their needs and capacity. For this purpose, Bank Negara Malaysia has introduced the framework for the licensing of financial advisers in 2005 in response to the increasing demand from Malaysian consumers for professional and specialised advisory services to meet their financial needs. The growing affluence and sophistication of consumers have created the demand for more complex financial products and services, specifically insurance products. The introduction of financial advisers, as a new distribution channel for the insurance and takaful industry, will complement the services of the existing professional intermediaries in the financial markets in providing holistic financial advisory services which range from insurance protection, savings for education, investments and retirement planning. In the long term, financial advisory business is only sustainable if its operations are transparent and focused on providing value added services rather than simply selling products. Financial advisers must provide the highest service levels and professional standards in order to sustain and prosper. Apart from the growing appetite of our consumers for more sophisticated products and services, another factor which had prompted the introduction of financial advisers into the financial services sector was the country’s relatively low insurance or takaful penetration rate.
Instead, it is important to analyze the loan growth in broader economic policy context where due consideration should be paid to the credibility of macroeconomic policies and the impact other policies may have on the incentive structure in the financial markets. As I stated earlier, the presence of Nordic banks in the Baltic market is, of course, a hugely important positive factor. Parent banks are sometimes considered to have an implicit responsibility for the stability of the banking systems in the Baltic countries. It is said that the Baltic banks are too small to fail. International experience lends support to this view, although the evidence is not always in one way. Hence, there are also potential risks. If parent banks are active in many countries of the region, a shock affecting exposure in one country may lead to a reduction in their exposure across the region. Build-up of exposures to common risk factors in a region may also increase the potential for contagion - a reduction in lending to countries not affected by a crisis. The potential for contagion is naturally higher in highly integrated economies. Another potential risk factor is the smallness of the banks in the Baltics combined with their high profitability. While the Nordic banks have high profitability in all of their markets, profitability in the Baltic market is especially high. As a result, the share of banking groups' assets in the Baltics is significantly lower than the share of profits banks make in this region.