Referring back to the performance of inflation, INSTAT data reveal that consumer prices rose on average 2.5% in the first quarter of 2013. Inflation continues to be determined by food prices; their contribution accounts for about 90% of headline inflation. Moreover, food inflation was offset by the lower inflation of non-food consumer goods. Inflation of this category reflected the downward oil price, following its decline in international markets. Also, the price fall of long-term consumer goods provided downward effects, whereas prices of other consumer goods did not change significantly. From the macroeconomic perspective, inflation continues to reflect the weak pressures from the aggregate demand-side and the absence of supply-side shocks. Below-potential growth of aggregate demand leads to underutilisation of production capacities and generates weak pressures on increasing wages, producer prices and profit margins. Under these circumstances, internal pressures on consumer prices appear weak, as reflected by the low core inflation. On the other hand, imported inflation was subdued due to the low inflation in Albania’s trading partners and the stable exchange rate. The most recent data on the real economy are as at 2012 Q4. According to these data, the Albanian economy grew 1.7% driven by expanded activity in the services, industry and agriculture sectors. The activity of the construction sector continued to shrink. Data on economic activity for the first quarter of this year remain limited. Based on indirect indicators, our analyses point to low economic growth, relying mainly on foreign demand, while the domestic demand components continue their sluggish performance.
The PRA has authorised ten banks in the last two years, and currently we have a substantial pipeline of interested parties. We are thinking about competition in our domestic work, but also about how we approach international policy issues. For instance, this week our response to the European Commission’s consultation on the impact of the new capital regime has been published. It is quite often said that aspects of the capital regime discriminate against smaller banks and building societies that use the so-called standardised capital approach versus larger banks that use their own models. The consequence of this is that smaller banks and building societies cannot compete effectively in lower risk asset markets such as prime mortgages because the capital requirements are too far apart and in favour of large banks. This forces them into riskier assets and undermines their position. This is an area where the leverage ratio acts to counterbalance the difference, a point that is not well enough understood. But in our response to the European Commission we said that while the financial stability benefits from regulation of large, internationally-active banks mean these firms should meet global standards, a differentiated approach for smaller firms would recognise the high costs and smaller benefits of applying global standards to them, and should enable us to find ways to create a regime which is more simple and which reduces their reporting burden. This would help to foster competition and would be good for the European Single Market.