Without these measures we would probably have faced a financial meltdown. One sign that the crisis is no longer as acute is that what are known as TED spreads have fallen in Sweden, as well as the United States and the euro area. The TED spread is the difference between a three-month interbank rate and a three-month treasury bill rate. The spreads are now back at around the levels prevailing immediately prior to the worsening of the crisis in autumn 2008. But the financial markets are still functioning much less efficiently than normal. It is also still difficult for companies to finance themselves in the capital market. Moreover, the liquidity injection from the central banks does not solve the banks’ capital problems. For this reason it is not surprising that the international discussion is currently aimed more at solvency than liquidity. It would be very much appreciated if many countries could begin to distinguish bad banks from good ones in an effective and transparent manner. In Sweden, too, we have implemented a large number of unconventional measures to safeguard financial stability and mitigate the negative effects of the financial crisis. During the second half of 2008 the Riksbank increased its lending to the banks by more than SEK 450 billion. Almost SEK 200 billion of this was comprised of loans in US dollars. This has largely been financed by means of swap agreements with the Federal Reserve in the United States.
These countries have sought a return on their financial capital abroad by investing, for instance, in US treasuries. The increased demand for US treasury bonds has for a long time been pushing down long-term interest rates in the United States. In addition, the US central bank conducted expansionary monetary policy in connection with the recession at the beginning of the 2000s and in the years immediately following. The low interest rates have stimulated consumption and investment in the United States. They contributed in particular to house prices rising more quickly than household incomes. The rising stock market and house prices contributed to a reduction in household saving, which largely explains the rising current account deficit until the housing market bubble burst. However, the problems of a previously overheated housing market are not limited to the United States, they can also be found in a number of other countries. New forms of borrowing, including subprime loans, contributed to overheating in the US housing market During the years 2004 and 2005 new loan forms became increasingly common in the housing market in the United States, not least subprime loans. Subprime loans are loans aimed at households with low incomes. Often the lenders used very low interest rates during the first two years of the loan as an enticement. However, after this period the interest rates rose substantially. It is likely that the credit assessment of the households was not too comprehensive.