Measuring this effect precisely is of course hard, since we cannot easily identify what the counterfactual would have been in the absence of QE. But QE clearly acted to break a dangerous risk of transmission from severe market stress to the macro-economy, by avoiding a sharp tightening in financial conditions and thus an increase in effective interest rates. 3  All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/speeches and @BoE_PressOffice  3  QE is normally thought to work through a number of channels: including signalling of future central bank intentions and thus interest rates; so called ‘portfolio balance’ effects (i.e. by changing the composition of assets held by the private sector); and improving impaired market liquidity. The Monetary Policy Committee’s decision on QE in March differed somewhat from previous rounds of purchases. A larger amount of purchases, £ was announced as this was judged as necessary to support economic activity and ensure a sustainable return of inflation to target. And the purchases were to “be completed as soon as is operationally possible” to address the emerging financial market dysfunction. In the paper we draw two lessons from the experience. First, it reminds us that the effect of QE can be state contingent. Consistent with that, second, the pace of QE purchases may be more important during a period of market dysfunction associated with a widespread shock to liquidity demand. Indeed, when the MPC voted to expand QE further in June, in more normal market conditions, the pace of purchases was reduced.
Many of our banks have embraced sustainability goals while our Islamic Banks are striving actively to adopt Value-Based Intermediation; banking and financing based on Principles of Shariah that encompass not just sustainability but also the wider goals of Maqasid Shariah and social economic well-being. Financial markets should not be left behind. We should strive to work towards adopting sustainable and ethical practices where we can in the Malaysian financial markets. Extra support can be given to market activities that nudge the economy towards sustainable development, inclusivity and social welfare. Again, the industry can think of ways and means of how you can play a role in this. Lastly, having experienced heightened uncertainties in recent years, we continue to need to  improve the financial market environment to ensure that markets are resilient against any form of shock. A part of this is that market players themselves need to be agile. This has become a necessity in the landscape of the financial world today which has shorter visibility on what we can expect due to the ever changing nature of the financial markets. The ability to adapt and react immediately is a must to thrive in future years. Data science analytics and greater expertise will increase the agility of financial institutions to acclimatise to not only new demand but also new regulations or developments. Alongside that, the development of talent with forwardthinking capabilities would be instrumental in elevating the quality of financial services.