But the dramatic and ongoing changes give investors hope and confidence that these problems will in time be overcome, making them feel that they cannot afford not to be in China. A second reason for Southeast Asia’s under-performance is the regional political and security situation. The Asian Crisis precipitated major social and political changes in many countries, deterring MNCs from committing to new investments in an uncertain climate. These overriding political concerns also distracted the governments from tackling urgent economic problems and implementing painful structural reforms to remedy weaknesses uncovered by the crisis. In contrast, South Korea’s aggressive post-crisis restructuring of its corporate sector has spurred a more rapid recovery. Most crucially, the Asian Crisis brought down the Suharto Government in Indonesia, and launched Indonesia on a new and uncharted path. For thirty years, a stable Indonesia, with a strong government focused on economic development, had provided a critical basis for confidence and peaceful cooperation in the whole of Southeast Asia. Suharto’s fall changed this. The subsequent Indonesian government abandoned Suharto’s longstanding policy of restraining political Islam, thus opening Pandora’s box. Islamic groups, including the militant ones, now wield considerable influence in Indonesia’s body politic. Indonesia’s political and social landscape has altered drastically and permanently, affecting the whole region. More recently, Southeast Asia has faced security problems from extremist Islamic terrorist groups linked to Al Qaeda. After September 11, such groups were discovered in Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Indonesia.
Conclusion Singapore has not shied away from tough measures to remake our economy and maximise our chances in a difficult environment. These measures will enhance our competitiveness, strengthen our companies and consolidate our social cohesion. They will make our economy more flexible, resilient and able to adjust quickly to changing circumstances, and so help it to remain ahead in the race of nations. Although the media impression is that Southeast Asia has stagnated since the Asian Crisis, the reality is less gloomy. ASEAN economies have made progress in picking up the pieces and pursuing domestic reform and restructuring, albeit some more successfully than others. Between 1999-2001, ASEAN economies as a whole grew by about 4% per annum. Last year, an export-led slowdown on the back of a global electronics slump broke the recovery trend. But ASEAN economies weathered the downturn fairly well, with most still managing positive GDP growth. Most are running current account surpluses, in contrast to the large deficits that prevailed in 1997. From a macroeconomic standpoint, the countries have held up well and even shown a certain resilience. Reflecting this, ASEAN stockmarkets have generally performed better than their counterparts in the rest of the world thus far this year. Part of Southeast Asia’s negative image is attributable to political and security concerns, which are indeed real. A week or so after the Bali attack, these worries naturally loom large. Many observers, seized by the mood of the moment, are now forecasting the worst for the region.