And the euro will also encourage “cross fertilisation” of best practices through stronger co ordination of member states policies in areas such as labour markets, education and training, job creation incentives, effective welfare safety nets, etc. In this sense, the euro – which is in itself a major structural reform- must, and will certainly, bring about other structural reforms. í  The fourth condition is that all economic leaders in Europe must be clearsighted with regard to the crucial matter of competitiveness. Pre-euro economic policy meant in particular monitoring trade balances, the balance of payments and the foreign exchange and interest rate markets. Economic leaders thus received constant and to a large extent real time feedback on key indicators affecting national economic performance and could react accordingly. These indicators remain on the euro-wide level: this is why the mutual surveillance of fiscal and economic policies provided for by the Treaty is so important. But they have disappeared at the national level with the advent of the euro, whilst the. rules of a market economy continue to apply to each economy participating in the euro zone. Jobs are created by consumers when they choose the goods and services they feel are the best value for money. Businessmen allocate these jobs to different possible locations in different countries according to the relative competitive advantages of these locations. Therefore the leaders of each national economy must monitor competitiveness through indicators such as unit production costs, tax and regulatory frameworks and so forth. This is even more important than before.
So, without further ado, may I declare the seminar open and wish you all a successful deliberation over the next two days. Thank you again for the invitation, and thank you for your attention. 2  BIS Review 18/2008