Low demand abroad contributes to low demand in Sweden, too. And low price increases abroad contribute to low import prices at a given exchange rate. However, this does not mean that monetary policy lacks the ability to counteract these developments. I usually think of this as a rowing boat in a strong current. If we do not row, the current (global developments) will determine what direction the boat moves in. But if we row, we have a better ability to get where we want to go, particularly if we try to keep away from the parts of the water where the current is strongest. The monetary transmission mechanism is usually divided up into different channels (see Figure 6).20 The channel most often mentioned is probably the interest rate channel. A lower interest rate makes it more attractive to consume and invest. This increases demand in the economy. And in the long run, the higher demand means that prices and wages rise, that is, inflation increases. In an economy like Sweden’s, which is so dependent on international developments, the exchange rate channel probably has greater importance, at least for the development of inflation. An (unexpected) repo rate cut means that the krona weakens. The weaker krona leads to an increase in demand for Swedish goods at the cost of foreign goods. In addition, there is a direct inflation effect that arises when imports become more expensive as a result of the weaker exchange rate.
The increasing relevance of China in the world economy and in world trade following its accession into the WTO, generated a booming effect in commodity markets and world demand that more than compensated the negative effect of increases in world interest rates, giving important support for the balance of payment, fiscal accounts and the investment outlook in emerging economies. We are now at the early stages of a new and historical tightening cycle in the United States. It is reasonable to ask ourselves how comparable the current situation is relative to previous experiences. I want to make a few points here. We expect the Fed to move more gradually than on previous occasions  Why? First, the Fed prefers to err on the side of moving slowly, and markets expect so. In part, as seen in Figure 3, inflation measured as the PCE core is still low compared to its level on previous hiking cycles. Also, neutral rates are estimated to be very low this time, so the Fed considers that monetary policy is not as expansionary as the headline Fed Funds Rate suggests.  Besides, the Federal Reserve is very much aware of the financial stability risks of abrupt changes in rates. The term premium implicit in long term yields is very low, and the taper Tandrum episode of 2013 shows that it can change fast if markets misinterpret the Fed communication.