Analyzed in terms of the ratio to national income, the ratio of the current account deficit was 6.4 percent by the end of 2005. The said ratio rose to 6.9 percent in the first quarter of 2006. Certainly, high rates of current account deficit are not peculiar to Turkey and can also be observed in other transition economies that grow at similar high rates. For instance, the ratio of current account deficit to gross domestic product is 11.8 percent in Bulgaria, 8.7 percent in Romania, 7.9 percent in Hungary and 7.2 percent in the Slovak Republic, as of 2005 1 . Higher rates of global and financial integration enable countries to sustain higher rates of current account deficit, to the extent that the robustness of their macroeconomic fundamentals allows. Due to the impact of these conditions, a current account deficit on a higher plateau has also been sustained in Turkey in recent years. 1  IMF, World Economic Outlook, April 2006  BIS Review 89/2006  9  The recent high increase observed in the current account deficit in Turkey is not the result of the increase in consumption, but comes from the increase in investments that boosts the production capacity. Crude oil prices, which have been following a high and volatile course in international markets and maintaining their upward trend in recent years, stand as another factor explaining the widening of the current account deficit.
Norges Bank will increasingly use the Fund’s properties in developing investment strategies ahead, with particular emphasis on taking advantage of the Fund’s size and long-term investment horizon. BIS Review 45/2008  5  Norges Bank’s mandate sets the tracking error limit at 1.5 percentage points. Given this limit, the actual portfolio return is likely to deviate by less than 1.5 percentage points from the benchmark portfolio in two of three years, but it also implies a risk that active management may reduce the return by more than 1.5 percentage points every sixth year. In light of the size of the Fund, this will be a substantial amount in krone terms. Losses from active management must be expected in periods. Losses are not necessarily an indication that active management is not conducted professionally or not using the right strategies. The performance of the Fund’s investment management must be evaluated over a long time horizon. Even if the contribution from active management was negative for the first time in the Fund’s history last year, it does not change our confidence in and conviction that our organisation will contribute to achieving excess returns in the longer run. Thank you for your attention.