A monetary policy that is guided by an inflation target is basically concerned with adapting the development of demand to the economy’s long-term growth. That is not easy, I can assure you, and our chances should not be exaggerated. Towards the end of last year, however, activity in the Swedish economy did begin to slow to a growth rate that can result in a stable long term development. The last time we met, early in October, we discussed the situation in these terms and I concluded that if the strong economic upswing were to continue, it would be necessary to raise the repo rate. Other central banks around the world had been facing a similar situation for some time. The U.S. Federal Reserve, for example, had raised its instrumental rate successively during 1999 and 2000 to 6.5 per cent. Last year the European Central Bank raised its rate to 4.75 per cent and the Bank of England’s rate was increased to 6.0 per cent. I recall that last year many observers counted on relatively large interest rate hikes in Sweden as well. They thought they saw signs that the Swedish economy was on the way to becoming overheated and argued rather vigorously that the Riksbank therefore ought to act quickly — starting in the autumn of 1999 and continuing with further steps up to last summer — in order to avert the threat they saw looming on the horizon.
It is not yet possible to tell to what extent the U.S. economy will experience a lengthy, more difficult process of adjustment. That is probably the background to how the Federal Reserve has acted in recent years. A series of interest rate hikes during 1999 and 2000 were presumably intended to restrain the euphoria and excessive expansion. When a downturn then became evident, it seemed  2  BIS Review 26/2001  desirable to try to limit the mood swing by means of the marked interest rate cuts we have seen this year. It is precisely the Federal Reserve’s vigorous action that underlies certain analysts’ view that the current economic slowdown will be fairly mild and brief. If international activity were to move into a recovery, most things suggest that demand in the Swedish economy would start rising rapidly again. The earlier capacity restrictions would then return to the agenda, with the attendant risk of an accelerating rate of inflation. So the situation is difficult to assess and I grant that the judgements our Executive Board has had to make in connection with the present Inflation Report have been more difficult than usual. While the difficulty in predicting the future is admittedly a truism, the present international economic situation is perhaps the trickiest for a decade. Growth with a balanced picture of inflation The main scenario we have adopted in the Inflation Report envisages weaker real economic activity in the rest of the world, with the slowdown in the United States in the foreground.