If supply responds to recovering demand, unemployment will fall more slowly than otherwise and the point at which we will re-evaluate the stance of monetary policy will come later. What of unbalanced growth? The Bank of England is alive to the risks of extended stimulus, and given its responsibility for macro-prudential policy, it can act in a timely fashion to mitigate them. The Bank demonstrated this flexibility recently with a package of measures targeted at the housing market, and it has outlined a broad range of additional tools if further action were required. The synergies of combining the monetary and macro-prudential authorities in one institution could be considerable. By sharing analysis and clearly assigning a hierarchy of responsibilities between them, the Bank’s MPC and its financial policy equivalent, the FPC, are ensuring that measures are timely, proportionate and targeted. For example, the Bank’s Funding for Lending scheme, originally put in place for monetary policy purposes, was refocused from household to small business lending for financial stability purposes. Similarly, both committees have made it clear that monetary policy is the last line of defence against financial stability risks, thereby establishing clear lines of responsibility and accountability. This coordination is particularly important if either of the “secular stagnation” stories is relevant. By addressing risks to financial stability, the Bank’s FPC helps ensure that monetary policy can remain as stimulative as necessary for as long as necessary to achieve its objectives. In doing so, it reduces the risk of a deepening liquidity trap caused by compounding debt-fuelled consumption.
4 9 1392 3      3 7 7   7  $   4 77   3 8 7 454 7 4214 54874 544   577  = >77  487  6 6 0976 07 92 2276 6976 3026 6 6 2 7 62 61 6172  62791 26 6 6 2 91 61 9 6 6172 95 651 667 07 62791 95 651 6 651 95 651  7917 9 3 69236 9196 6976  1 466 1679  0 022012 6 6 3 9 6 6 9 05 59   678 90 78 678     8 319 0  83  38 8       0   !  38   #9 1280