Lars Heikensten: Thoughts on how to develop the Riksbank’s monetary policy work Speech by Mr Lars Heikensten, Governor of the Sveriges Riksbank, at the Swedish Economics Association, Stockholm, 22 February 2005. *  *  *  Introduction Allow me to begin by thanking you for the invitation to once again visit the Economics Association and speak about monetary policy. Since I was here a year ago there has been a relatively lively debate, by Swedish standards, on monetary policy. Some commentators have focused on the currently low inflation rate, but what has really added fuel to the debate is the rise in unemployment that has occurred despite record-low interest rates and strong growth. Other participants have centred on the low interest rates, voicing concerns over their implications for credit growth, household debt and the housing market. I don’t intend to enter into this discussion today, however. Instead, I would like to take advantage of the opportunity to have a more fundamental discussion about the Riksbank’s monetary policy framework, its monetary policy analysis and the possibilities to improve the material underpinning our decisions. I shall describe the changes that we are planning to make to our methods. At the same time I should stress that it is not a question of changing the Bank’s monetary policy strategy.
I say this in my capacity as a totally independent central banker: the new government in France is taking reforms very seriously and is acting with impressive speed. France is now a reliable economic partner of Europe and Germany. Second, it would be ridiculous to reduce the debate to the old caricature that contrasts "German rules” with “French expenditure". To my mind, it is out of the question to implement a “transfer union”, which would only benefit certain countries, or to introduce Eurobonds, which would amount to collectivising debts. Need I remind that France too is a net contributor to the European budget, or to financing for Greece? But I am convinced that risk sharing between 1/3  BIS central bankers' speeches  countries can – and should – go hand-in-hand with risk reduction mechanisms. It is wrong to draw a distinction between solidarity and responsibility: in reality, they are complementary. For crisis prevention to be credible, it must also have the instruments needed to cushion the effects of substantial shocks that may arise regardless. As for the third cliché, let’s stop pitting the "French vision” against “German pragmatism". In order to reform the euro area, we must be practical and take real needs, and particularly those of businesses and entrepreneurs, as our starting point – as I aim to do in the second part of my speech.