And all the narrow collateral previously eligible will remain permissible under the new regime as either narrow or wider collateral. 6  Of course any drawdown is predicated on the counterparty being expected to remain solvent. 7  This is in line with new FSB principles aimed at reducing the extent to which ratings are “hard-wired” into financial contracts. BIS central bankers’ speeches  5  Chart 3 Metrics of sovereign credit risk, market liquidity and size(a) US France Germany Netherlands Canada UK Italy Spain Belgium Austria Australia Sweden Denmark Finland Norway  5 yr CDS premia  300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -1  0 -50  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  10yr bond bid-offer spread (bps)  (a) The size of the bubbles is representative of the total amount of sovereign debt outstanding (in sterling terms). Ireland and Portugal are not shown, as their respective bubbles lie significantly to the north-east of the other countries identified in the Chart. Bubbles for Cyprus, Japan, Luxemburg, New Zealand, Slovenia and Switzerland are also not shown for clarity (although they are accepted as wider collateral). Data as at 11 April. Valuation The Bank’s valuation of collateral plays a key role in protecting the Bank against loss in the event of a counterparty default. Where available, the Bank uses market prices to value a security.
This could be illustrated on the table describing developments in the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary in terms of inflation and GDP growth: 1991  1992  1993  1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  CPI Czech R. Poland Hungary  52,0 60,3 35,0  12,7 44,6 23,0  18,2 37,7 21,9  10,2 29,4 21,6  7,9 21,8 29,2  8,6 18,8 20,3  10,0 13,2 18,8  6,8 8,4 10,5  2,5 9,8 11,4  4,0 8,6 10,2  4,1 3,6 6,8  0,6 0,8 4,8  GDP Czech R. Poland Hungary  –11,6 –7,0 –11,9  –0,5 2,6 –3,1  0,1 3,8 –0,6  2,2 5,2 2,9  5,9 7,0 1,5  4,3 6,0 1,3  –0,8 6,8 4,6  –1,0 4,8 4,9  0,5 4,1 4,2  3,3 4,0 5,2  3,1 1,0 3,8  2,0 1,4 3,3  EIU Country data, national statistics  As already mentioned, since the financial sector consisted mainly of the banking sector, the impact of economic reform was felt mainly by the banks. There was no alternative source of financing for corporations, so difficulties in the corporate sector were passed on directly to the banks. The situation was complicated more by the fact that the government owned some of the most important corporations, as well as the main banks. Political rationale preceded economics. In most of the countries, the privatization of most firms happened early in the transformation process.