Much attention will also be required, in the fullness of time, to make sure that the financial systems through which financial intermediation takes place are robust so that the benefits of financial liberalization could be maximized and the associated risks could be minimized and prudently managed. 3. As a financial services centre which operates with a highly liberal regime, Hong Kong has important roles to play in all this. There is not enough time to go into details here on this occasion, so I shall just identify three general areas for your consideration. 4. The first area concerns financial intermediation within individual economies, in other words, the channelling of domestic savings into domestic investments. Here Hong Kong, at this stage at least, largely only plays an advisory role. The less liberalized financial systems in this region are very much dominated by domestic financial institutions, particularly in the banking market. Further, domestic politics and a desire to protect domestic financial institutions from undue competition are such that liberalization to admit foreign financial institutions to take part in domestic financial intermediation would only proceed at a pace dictated by these considerations. For example, it will, I think, take some time and patience for Hong Kong-based banks to gain a physical presence in the mainland of China, be allowed access to renminbi banking business and command a significant share of that business. 5.
Let me elaborate on where these challenges may come from. It is a well-known fact that the size of the banking sector in most post-communist acceding countries still remains far below the EU average. In the acceding countries, bank credit to the domestic private sector typically has a ratio of 30 to 40 percent of GDP, while the EU average is around 100 percent of GDP. This difference is to a large extent natural, reflecting the lower GDP levels of the acceding countries, their history, and the recent weaknesses in their legal and institutional environments. Nevertheless, it is quite likely that this legacy of the past will be overcome in the foreseeable future. The driving force might be the real convergence process. And perhaps more importantly, the acceding countries can capitalise on their reform achievements of recent years. Despite differences in their reform strategies and numerous transitional difficulties, most acceding countries have achieved great progress in building their financial systems. Their banking sectors are now mostly stabilised, privatised, and typically dominated by foreign ownership. Moreover, the acceding countries have also achieved considerable improvements in the functioning of their general legal and institutional frameworks. BIS Review 8/2004  1  Recent empirical studies by the IMF have shown that there might be scope for substantial convergence in bank credit in the acceding countries with EU levels. In some cases and in some periods, the real credit growth might reach as much as 30 percent a year, or even more.