The quantitative definition of price stability has been clarified after five years of experience The definition adopted by the ECB’s Governing Council in October 1998 was confirmed and clarified in May 2003 following an in-depth review of its strategic framework by the Eurosystem. In the wake of this assessment exercise, the Governing Council specified that price stability was defined as an annual increase in the HICP close to, but below, 2% over the medium term. Several remarks should complement this definition: - by specifying that inflation should be close to 2%, the Governing Council intended first of all to confirm the symmetrical nature of its strategy by ruling out situations of deflation. This clarification also makes it possible to take account of any possible measurement bias in the price index, as well as inflation differentials within the euro area; - the quantitative definition of monetary stability brings the Eurosystem’s strategic framework close to that of central banks that rely on inflation targeting, especially if a broad definition of the latter is accepted, such as that expressed by the term “flexible inflation targeting”. The big difference is in the use made of forecasts derived from econometric models, which play a predominant role in “pure” inflation targeting strategies, whereas they are only one component in the decision-making process of the Governing Council of the Eurosystem; - especially in the early days, we were confronted with substantial criticism regarding our definition of price stability, considered by many observers as too ambitious.
Against the backdrop of fear and uncertainty, banks have tightened their lending and consumers have become more cautious in their spending. This will act as a drag on the euroarea economy going forward. A key constraint for both the US and euro-area, as well as many other advanced economies, is the limited policy space available to authorities. In these countries, monetary policy and fiscal stimulus have been pushed to their limits. Limited capacity to respond to new shocks thus represents a real risk for these economies, and for the global economy, that we must be weary of. In this setting, and given the deep-seated nature of the problems being faced, meaningful remedies rest just as much on political factors as on economic ones. How governments respond and how their electorates receive these responses will be an important source of uncertainty. In contrast, the rising economies in Asia offer a more positive outlook. Despite the slowdown in exports of many Asian countries, reflecting the softer global economic backdrop, domestic demand remains robust. More fundamentally, the continued rise of China and the formation of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) will generate enormous economic opportunities for the region. As will be discussed later, the key challenge for Thailand will be how to optimally position ourselves to reap the full benefits of this trend. This brings me to the internal challenges.