Ladies and Gentlemen you will agree with me that we have come a long way since the time when many viewed the financial system simply as a sideshow, or a passive channel that allocated scarce resources to the most efficient uses. Today, almost everyone agrees that the financial system is essential for development. Improving the financial system can lead to higher growth and reduce the likelihood and severity of crises. It is essential that we have a clear understanding of the causes of business cycles and the working of monetary policy. In thinking about financial reform, we need to treat liberalization as a means rather than an end. Instead of pushing for immediate deregulation, we should try to understand the important role authorities play in financial markets. These steps will not only result in a better and more stable allocation of domestic capital, but also help countries to develop their capital markets with the requisite financial systems. In view of this I encourage you all to join hands with authorities in your countries in improving financial infrastructure so as to contribute to the development of our regional financial  BIS Review 149/2010  5  systems and thereby improving the availability of capital. I am also encouraged by the increasing number of financial service providers in our economies. As competition intensifies, banks and other financial institutions will start to reposition themselves by lowering the cost of lending to the private sector.
This is important because the crisis demonstrated that bank investors and debt holders have a strong presumption that only common equity is truly loss absorbing outside bankruptcy. In the crisis, as losses climbed, Tier 1 capital ratios were eroded from the bottom, with tangible common equity ratios sometimes shrinking to levels that raised questions about a bank’s viability and its ability to access the equity and debt markets. Although common equity is typically a higher-cost form of capital for banks, it absorbs losses on a going-concern basis and so preserves an institution’s viability in the eyes of the market much better than other forms of Tier I capital, such as perpetual preferred stock or trust preferred securities (TRUPS). Second, the standards create a new definition of what constitutes common equity. The emphasis is on the ability of common equity to be loss absorbing. For that reason, there are limits on the amount of the assets that are not readily saleable or loss absorbing that can be counted toward a bank’s tangible common equity. These include assets such as mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets. Also, there is strict treatment of equity tied up in the form of minority interests. That is because this invested equity is not immediately available to the parent company to absorb losses in that company’s operations. Third, the minimum required ratio of total tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets will be increased significantly. Once the new standards are fully phased in, it will have to equal 4.5 percent of risk-weighted assets.