Niklaus Blattner: Global trends in financial market infrastructures and their significance for financial stability Introductory remarks by Mr Niklaus Blattner, Vice-Chairman of the Governing Board of the Swiss National Bank, at the end-of-year media news conference, Zurich, 14 December 2006. *  *  *  Developments at banks and financial markets are subject to extensive daily media analysis and commentary. By contrast, financial market infrastructures, i.e. stock exchanges, payment and securities settlement systems, only rarely make the headlines. I have decided to shift the focus today and concentrate on financial market infrastructures. In particular, I wish to highlight some interesting global trends and assess how these trends impact on the stability of the financial system. Internationalisation of financial market infrastructures Traditionally, most financial market infrastructures have a strong national focus. This made sense as long as the financial markets also had a strong domestic focus. However, the deregulation and liberalisation of financial markets and the associated increase in cross-border financial flows resulted in a widening gap between financial markets and financial market infrastructures, with the latter remaining constrained within national bounds. More internationalisation of financial market infrastructures became inevitable in order to avoid a loss of competitiveness due to inefficiencies. This process of opening up market infrastructures still continues today. We can differentiate between different types of internationalisation. First, direct access to infrastructures that used to be reserved exclusively to domestic participants is now being granted more frequently to foreign participants as well.
Although the general government “structural deficit” is not directly observable and, therefore, its calculation is based on assumptions subject to a high degree of uncertainty, it is a useful indicator of the underlying state of public finances. This indicator will, moreover, play a more important role in the new phase of fiscal policy due to begin, in the event that the EU Council eventually rules that Spanish general government is no longer in an excessive deficit situation. As I have already mentioned, the latest data point in this direction. In fact, exiting the “corrective arm” of the EU’s Stability and Growth Pact would involve Spain automatically entering the “preventive arm”.