3  Third, the financing gap is now much lower than it was when the crisis emerged: after jumping in 2009 to 16.4% of GDP, it gradually decreased year after year, it went below the 10% benchmark in 2014, then to 7.5% in 2017 and it stagnated now in 2018. (Figure 5). Fourth, the refinancing risk has been significantly diminished as it is negatively correlated with the average maturity. As of June 2018, the average maturity of Romania’s Eurobonds is 9.7 years (Figure 6), and the investors base is much more diversified than in 2011. Average maturity for local bonds doubled from 1.6 to 3.2 years, and the average maturity of our debt is 6.4 years, compared to 3.8 years in 2011. Moreover, the share of public debt with fixed interest rate is 90%, which reduces the interest rate risk on the stock of debt. Regaining and consolidating our access to the international markets after the crisis has been a major success of all governments and it is a sign of trust in our economy. Another factor pointing towards lower contagion risk from external shocks refers to net external debt. The net external debt is now lower than in 2008: 20.2% of GDP in 2017, against 27% in 2008 (Figure 7). The reduced contagion risk is also visible in the banking sector, through at least 5 key indicators.
One driving force is of course that the world around us is constantly changing – and often very quickly. Quite simply, there are new demands made on us from outside, which we must deal with as best we can. Developments during the financial crisis in recent months are a good example of this. There are also demands from outside regarding our interaction with the general public, with other public authorities and with you who work in the financial markets. It is important that we communicate and work together efficiently, both to ensure monetary policy functions smoothly and to safeguard financial stability. But the pressure for changes does not only come from outside. We are constantly working on developing our working methods. It may not always be apparent to those who do not work at the Riksbank, but there is a strong will among our employees to improve our ways of thinking and working. There is a positive driving force behind the changes we are implementing. I am convinced that this driving force has contributed to the fact that we now have much better working methods than before. Another positive driving force is the regular contacts we have with other central banks and with the academic world. 2  BIS Review 155/2008  The developments cover everything from new methods to our communication. Something that constitutes an example of both of these things is the forecast for the repo rate path that we now publish regularly.