From today’s vantage point, it is easy to forget how revolutionary the introduction of RTGS was back in 1996. Before RTGS, all interbank payments were subject to some element of settlement risk – the risk that a bank would fail between the time it promised to make a payment, and the time it delivered on that promise. By allowing banks to settle high value transactions between each other, electronically, in real time, RTGS eliminated settlement risk on the largest payments flows – the ones most likely to threaten financial stability by bringing down the system if they failed. But that is not the only innovation that RTGS has delivered over the years. As the financial system has evolved, RTGS has been regularly updated, introducing a raft of new functions and risk mitigants to respond to changing demands. Today, we are announcing that the Bank has completed, or agreed steps that will complete, all the actions in response to the Deloitte report 4 published in March last year following the RTGS outage in October 2014. Looking forward, as we celebrate RTGS’ twentieth birthday during 2016, it is again time to ask fundamental questions about the shape of the Bank’s settlement operations. The way payments are made has changed dramatically in recent years, reflecting changes in the needs of households and companies, changes in technology, and an evolving regulatory landscape. The range of payment providers is growing rapidly.
At the same time, banks are required to build additional capital buffers, which further constrain their pay-out ratio. So dividend prospects are doubly affected and that explains why share prices are reacting to negative news on growth. This movement has been more pronounced for French banks which are suffering from two specific vulnerabilities, one real, one exaggerated. The real vulnerability is their dependence on dollar funding, due to the scale of their international activities, which they may have been initially too slow to address effectively. It is currently being dealt with through a combination of deleveraging and consolidation. In the meantime, in order to ease this transition, the Eurosystem, together with other central banks across the world, has decided to conduct US dollar liquidity-providing operations with a maturity of three months. A more exaggerated concern about French banks is their exposure to sovereign risk. Let me just point out some facts: total exposure of major French banks to the sovereign risk of socalled “peripheral countries” amounts to € To take an extreme – and from my view point – totally unrealistic scenario – a 50% haircut on Greece and 25% haircut on Italy and Spain would result in a 12% loss of core Tier One capital. In terms of liquidity, the Eurosystem refinancing policy provides for an unlimited provision on an extended period and the collateral held by French banks in eligible assets is much above their present needs.