Finally, an important dimension of flexibility in our monetary policy that we should not overlook is the focus on avoiding financial fragmentation in the euro area, in particular when the impact of the pandemic has been and remains very heterogeneous across countries and sectors. In December last year, we decided to retain this flexibility in the PEPP reinvestment phase, which was extended until the end of 2024. We should now use this  13  flexibility proactively and monitor whether it is sufficient to ensure our monetary policy is appropriately transmitted across the euro area. 4 Conclusions Let me conclude. I am convinced that the ECB’s new monetary policy strategy, which I have briefly sketched in this talk, constitutes a solid basis for the conduct of our monetary policy. This is so, not just looking ahead to the coming decades, but also for coping with the current high-inflation episode. In this respect, I believe that, in a highly uncertain environment, a careful assessment of the implications that current developments have on medium-term inflation expectations is key, and that the optionality and flexibility that we retain should be exercised gradually and predictably. The direction in which we need to head is clear, but we should not draw premature conclusions as to the time frame. The process will be both gradual and data-dependent. Thank you for your attention. 14  References Ajevskis, V. (2018), "The Natural Rate of Interest: Information Derived from a Shadow Rate Model," Working Papers 2018/02, Latvijas Banka.
About our external scenario, incoming data show improved performance of exports across sectors (figure 9). Still, examining numbers of the first half, we foresee that the export volumes will contract during the year. However, by 2018 they should recover thanks to improvements in the world economy, which coupled with better prices increase our estimated 5  trade balance for next year. The low comparison base due to the Escondida mine strike downtime early this year will also result in higher mining exports in 2018. Thus, in 2018, the current account deficit should be lower than we expected in September, close to 1% of GDP, similar to our 2017 projection. At trend prices, the current account deficit remains at 2.6% on average in 2017-2018 (table 1). Aside from the scenario I have just described for domestic activity and spending, the convergence of inflation to the target also considers a mild depreciation of the real exchange rate that will cause it to converge from where it was at the closing of this Report to its longterm equilibrium within the projection horizon. The baseline scenario also contemplates that the prices of foods, particularly fresh fruits and vegetables, will return to their normal patterns, so their annual inflation will be rising over the course of 2018. About monetary policy, the Board estimates that in the baseline scenario the surprises that have pulled inflation down below expectations do not compromise the convergence of inflation to the target.