It had shown an increase of 3.7% in December 1997. Financing raised on the domestic markets progressed vigorously, with the year-on-year advance standing at 9.2% in December 1998, after 6.6% a year earlier. Against a background marked by uncertainty surrounding the international environment and by prospects of a euro area-wide slowdown in activity, on 3 December 1998 the Monetary Policy Council of the Banque de France, in close dialogue with the other members of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB), decided to cut its main key rate, which had been set at 3.30% since October 1997, to 3.0%. This decision was inspired by three considerations: – – –  the need to ensure the cohesion of the euro area in the best possible conditions; the need to organize the convergence of short-term rates towards the lowest rates in the area, i.e. in particular French rates; the need to choose the level of key rates that was most appropriate at the time of entry into the euro. This decision constituted a further stage in the process leading to the transfer of responsibility for monetary policy to the European System of Central Banks as of 1 January 1999. In fact, the rate applying to the first main refinancing operations of the ESCB was set at 3% on 22 December 1998 by the Governing Council of the ECB.
We should then gradually move towards compulsory transparency based on a “comply or explain” principle. Article 173 of the French Energy Transition Law – as it sets the Environmental Social Governance (ESG)-Climate approach as a new market standard – could usefully serve as a reference studied at the European level. 2/ Beyond the "snapshot of risks", the NGFS is working on a "video of risks", with long-term forward-looking stress tests to assess the dynamic effects of climate change on the economy and financial stability. The NGFS is currently developing economic scenarios based on climate change that could be used to conduct stress tests. Meanwhile, the ACPR has conducted a survey on banks and insurance companies to evaluate how they integrate physical and transition risks in their risk management. The results will be published by early 2019. They will be a good point to assess the progress made so far by the industry towards taking both risk factors into account. I would at this stage suggest caution on some NGOs’ analyses concluding that French banks have a “fossil energy bias”. Their large exposures to the oil and gas sector have indeed decreased between 2015 and 2017. This survey will also be valuable as inputs in designing the new framework needed to perform stress-test exercises and assess climate risk across the French financial system as a whole. III. Financing transition opportunities Like any good pilot, we want our plane to “gain some altitude”.