The adopted solution was embedded in the so-called Emergency Act, which was passed by Parliament on 6 October 2008. The Emergency Act saved the domestic operations of the banking system by creating new banks, which involved carving domestic assets and liabilities out of the old, failing banks. The rest – and the much larger part – went into a resolution process. In order to reverse the ongoing run on domestic deposits, a declaration was made that all deposits in Iceland were safe, but this did not include deposits in foreign branches. Furthermore, all deposits in Icelandic-headquartered banks were given priority over other unsecured claims, including in foreign branches. As regards the blanket guarantee, the distinction made between domestic deposits and foreign currency deposits in the banks’ foreign branches added fuel to the fire of the so-called Icesave dispute about the settlement of deposit guarantees in the Dutch and British branches of one of the banks. But guaranteeing those deposits would never have been credible and might have bankrupted the Government had it been attempted. The deposits in question were in foreign currencies and amounted to 11½ billion euros – far in excess of Iceland’s available FX liquidity at that time, as the sovereign was completely closed off from foreign capital markets.
Inflation expectation indicators also remain low over all horizons, far from the ECB’s 2% benchmark. 2  BIS central bankers’ speeches  However, it must be emphasised that monetary policy’s ability to address the challenges posed by a situation such as that we face today is not without limits. Laying the foundations for a sound and long-lasting recovery in activity, investment and employment requires an approach in concert with other economic policies, especially fiscal policy, along with institutional reform, labour and product market reforms and strengthened European governance. Thus, according to their individual circumstances, euro area countries should use the room for manoeuvre provided for in the Stability and Growth Pact to bolster aggregate demand and growth in activity. Admittedly, in many cases, the precarious state of public finances leaves little room for stimulus measures, such as tax cuts or higher public spending, especially because the countries with most spare capacity are also those with the highest levels of public debt. However, fiscal policy’s contribution to growth is not only determined by revenue and expenditure levels, but also by their composition. In that respect, there is some scope (broader in some countries than in others) for a shift in the tax structure towards taxes that are less distortionary and more favourable to growth. A further objective is to make public expenditure more efficient and direct it to those components that are more favourable to growth.