In this scenario, commodity prices are envisaged to go below the assumptions presented in the baseline scenario; credit conditions are projected to remain tight for a while and recovery in foreign demand would be a prolonged and slower process due to the late recovery in the global economy. Meanwhile, crude oil prices are projected to drop to USD 45 per barrel and remain at this level throughout the forecast horizon. This projection is above the one presented in the January Inflation Report, as OPEC announced that it would not allow sharp falls in oil prices. Meanwhile, it is foreseen that food prices inflation would remain below the baseline scenario and therefore will become 5.5 percent by the end of 2009 and 5 percent afterwards. Against this background, assuming that measured policy rate cuts continue throughout 2009, it is projected that with 70 percent probability, inflation will be between 3.9 and 6.5 percent with a mid-point of 5.2 percent at the end of 2009, and between 2.7 and 6.3 percent with a mid-point of 4.5 percent at the end of 2010. Furthermore, inflation is expected to go down to 4.2 percent by the end of 2011. To sum up, these forecasts indicate that in the case of a longer-than-expected slowdown in global economic activity, inflation would remain below the medium-term forecasts even if the measured policy rate cuts continue throughout 2009 (Graph 28).
And adaptation to structural change to the economy will mean putting capital into new businesses to replace those whose business models are no longer viable. Failure of risk transfer markets in things like directors’ and officers’ indemnity and – yes – business interruption would have a cooling effect on this necessary investment. So if a protection gap were to emerge through the reactions of insurers and insured to what they have learned about contract uncertainty, we should worry about the wider impact that that might have on economic recovery. I do see a risk of a protection gap. The pandemic has highlighted risks around unintended exposures in insurance contracts and unexpected links across risk areas under extreme circumstances. Most acutely on business interruption insurance – where we have seen vastly different interpretations of how policies should respond to the restrictions placed on businesses as a result of Covid-19, and the sums involved have perhaps militated against either insurer or insured settling for a compromise outcome to claims. The high profile of disputes over business interruption claims has done nothing to dent the popular caricature of an industry that is happier to accept premiums than to pay claims. This matters: it could have an impact on demand for policies, if businesses perceive them not in practice to offer the cover they need – not just in business interruption, but in indemnity policies that cover non-specific perils.