In that case it could be worth discussing a comeback for the tolerance band, but reintroducing the band would neither contribute to higher inflation expectations nor consequently to a rise in interest rates. Monetary policy cannot solve the problem of rising debt and housing prices What can be said then about the growth of household debt and housing prices? After all, one issue central to the criticism is that the low interest rate contributes to further increases in debt and housing prices. 13  The Riksbank (2010). 14  For example, Heikensten and Vredin (1998, pp. 585-586) noted that "A tolerance band could be a reflection of the fact that the central bank does not consider it important to aim for an inflation target in the middle of the band. Instead it may, as long as inflation is contained within this band, want to focus on achieving other targets, such as production or employment for example. This is portrayed at times [...] as "opportunistic" monetary policy. We do not feel, however, that this was the reason certain countries chose to put a tolerance band around their inflation target". 8  BIS central bankers’ speeches  It has been obvious to those who have followed the monetary policy debate that the Riksbank shares many people’s concerns about this development. This is clear from reports, minutes, speeches and a number of debate articles. The Riksbank has therefore pointed out the necessity of measures in other policy areas for several years.
For example, if you look at my preferred measure of underlying inflation, called trimmed-mean inflation—which removes the most volatile price movements—it’s been running at 2 percent. This measure of inflation hasn’t shown any signs of trending up or down. That said, I will be watching developments closely for signs of a persistent shift away from our 2 percent long-run goal. As I mentioned, the economy started the year with a lot of momentum. But there are reasons to believe that the surge in growth won’t persist through the remainder of the year. Taking into account of all the indicators we follow, I anticipate a step-down of economic growth, from the 3 percent growth recorded last year to a still-solid pace of about 2-1/4 percent in 2019. 1/2  BIS central bankers' speeches  This is good news. It’s above the economy’s underlying potential, but not unsustainably so. Healthy economic growth should in turn fuel solid job gains, higher wages for workers, and some further declines in unemployment. The strong economy and labor market should also support inflation returning to 2 percent, the Federal Reserve’s long-run goal. The Global Picture In addition to the positive data we’ve been getting for the U.S., we’ve also seen encouraging signs that risks from global economic and financial markets are abating. Last year there were worries that the global growth slowdown centered in China and Europe would spill over onto our shores. This was one factor contributing to a more downbeat assessment of U.S. growth and the stock market sell-off.