The net real wage was higher by 42.7% in 2017 as compared to 2008, while the number of employees is also higher by 2.4% in 2017 compared to 2008. As social contributions and other taxes were reduced, the increase in real wages was only partially mirrored by the increase in compensation of employees. When compared against EU average, labor productivity raised faster than compensation of employees over the entire period, therefore the unit labor cost, relative to our main trade partners (EU), decreased by 7.7 percentage points (Figure 3). This explains the positive dynamics of exports. Public debt, as a percentage of GDP, is three times higher now than it was in 2008 (35% in 2017 compared to 12% in 2008), but this is a misleading figure for a number of reasons. First, in 2008 and few years before that, Romania did not access international markets, by its own choice, as it financed the deficit from one-off revenues. Second, international reserves were 10 billion euro higher by the end of 2017 compared to the end of 2007 (Figure 4). International reserves include a foreign exchange buffer which has been built since 2011, reached an average of 4 months of financing in 2013 and fluctuated around this level since then. This buffer is the first line of defense against short-term external shocks which may affect emerging markets, and our opinion is that it is a very good instrument which needs to be preserved and consolidated.
This means that enhanced information disclosure required by Basle II, could be problematic if not supported by a proper public understanding. That’s why I feel a bit concerned about the effectiveness and appropriateness of an immediate implementation of Basle II. Therefore a more gradual approach may be necessary. This approach could take the form of an interim standard between Basel I and Basel II that could offer banks in emerging market economies some of the benefits of Basel II without having to face a prohibitive cost. This means that Basel II adoption should not be made mandatory in financial assessments (of WB, IMF for example) and countries should be left with the option to keep Basel I. EU banking directives are mandatory for our countries that opt to join EU. As Basel II elements are embedded in EU Directives, and as our countries are making progress toward integration in the EU, we shall be faced with the challenges of Basle II implementation. I’d like to point out three challenges in particular. Albania as many other East European Countries host a considerable number of foreign banks. These consist mostly of branches or subsidiaries of banks from EU countries which eventually may have to implement the new system including its most advanced elements if their head offices decide to adopt it throughout the network for consistency and competitiveness reasons.