To achieve this objective, we have made it mandatory for the conventional banks to establish a dedicated Islamic banking division within the bank, create and observe a minimum Islamic banking fund, opening separate clearing account with the Central Bank to facilitate effective separation in the payments system as well as to have a separate accounting disclosure. Having these policies and infrastructure in place, we have been able to operate the dual banking system in a structured and systematic manner. Ladies and Gentlemen, Although the regulations are in place, close oversight and updated statistical reporting, supported by close monitoring through the early warning system, are necessary as measures to avoid banking failures. The global experience has shown that not all banking failures are due to economic and financial crises. The global experiences has shown that banking failures can be caused by the lack of good corporate governance in the banking institutions. Lack of transparency, lack of oversight, weak internal controls, lack of checks and balances, incompetent directors and abuse of power are among the elements of poor corporate governance. Hence, even the best regulations and supervision and the best financial safety nets cannot prevent such banking failures. The regulation of banking institutions therefore needs to be complemented and reinforced with good corporate governance.
But since 1995, the gap has started to widen again as ICT investment has boosted productivity growth in the United States. The empirical evidence suggests that one of the most successful ways to speed up convergence in productivity is to promote international trade and investment, and openness more generally. Within manufacturing, the rate at which the productivity gap between Britain and the US closed during the 1980s and early 1990s was greater in the more open than the less open sectors. Against that background, let me suggest three areas for questions: First, why is the gap in the level of productivity between the US and the UK so persistent? And what are the obstacles that prevent the gap from narrowing - are they in the fields of trade, technology transfer, or flows of investment? What are the respective roles of business and government in removing them? Second, can the UK benefit as much as the US from the IT revolution? Is it a question of the speed with which business adapts? Or is it the need to fund our research-based universities on the scale of the best elsewhere in order to exploit our comparative advantage in the English language and regain Britain’s place at the frontiers of knowledge? Or is it a matter of raising standards of education in schools to enable the workforce as a whole to use the new technology?