At this time, although monthly value of land transactions has risen back to the previous peak level in 1996 and bank credits extended to real estate developers has picked up, we feel that there is no sign of overheating in this sector yet. Latest land prices have increased only by 14 percent on average, while housing prices for low- and medium-income families rose by less than 10 percent over that of last year. Nonetheless, it is important to keep a watchful eye on developments in the real estate sector, by making sure that bank lending to this sector is prudent. And for our part, there is now greater willingness to use the necessary prudential measures to discourage or forestall any undesirable development. Financial institutions are now required to report all real estate loans exceeding 100 million baht. Any real estate lending that is deemed too risky would require immediate additional provisioning. This should help ensure that growth of the real sector is driven by quality growth with least amount of bubbles, and that policy is proactive enough to prevent a reoccurrence of the real estate bubble prior to the 1997 crisis. To improve our ability to monitor this sector, we have developed a housing price index in cooperation with a number of agencies including the Government Housing Bank. This housing price data will be important for assessing the underlying conditions in the housing market, and will allow us to monitor any concentrations of risk before they develop in this sector.
It is possible that the e-krona could play a role for Sweden's crisis preparedness. But in any case, the Riksbank needs to clarify its role as provider of money in appropriate forms in a crisis situation. In the same way as the Riksbank is ‘lender of last resort’ for the banking system, we have a responsibility to enable payments in a crisis, to be a ‘money provider of last resort’. Personal reflections Two years of intensive work on the e-krona have now passed and I will be leaving the chairmanship of the steering group as the project enters the next phase. It has been two incredibly educational years, but I think it is still too early for me to decide whether or not I shall support an e-krona for the general public in the future. As has hopefully been clear from my earlier reasoning, this depends on whether it emerges that there are better alternatives to guarantee both the security and efficiency of the payment market. And to answer this, the analysis needs to continue. At the Riksbank, we will work in two parallel tracks: partly, we will develop the pilot version of a simpler form of the e-krona and learn the lessons that may be needed if it turns out that an e-krona is to be issued. And partly we will deepen our analysis of the consequences for Sweden if the payment market should become entirely privatised.