When Paul asks, "Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers?", I doubt if he meant that one brother claiming the property could unilaterally decide the issue between himself and the other brother?
Daytoy ket sapasap a naipagpagarup a ti Sindhind ket isu ti Brahmasphuta-siddhanta ni Brahmagupta.[5]