What I think makes the case so compelling that Kant was intending to disconcert us here, as opposed to being merely careless, is that in the first instance this contextualizing opening sentence is itself inherently incongruous (hence why it was so obviously so problematic for the translators), and that furthermore Kant then goes on to reinforce and effectively underwrite this suggestion of writing for amusement at the end of the book in the conclusion.
家用摄像头网上专卖店满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满意意满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满满意意了我是我是我是我是我是我是我是非常满意！。