The former interpretation is based upon the premise that the Law does NOT condemn anger (“angry with his brother”), railing and reviling (“whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca”), and murderous incrimination (“whosoever shall say, Thou fool”).
Daytoy ket sapasap a naipagpagarup a ti Sindhind ket isu ti Brahmasphuta-siddhanta ni Brahmagupta.[5]