In this case, a comparison between Schultz et al. (2007) and Allcott (2011) shows that the Opower experiments had a smaller estimated treated effect than the original experiments by Schultz and colleagues (1.7% versus 5%).
An dësem Fall ass e Verglach tëscht Schultz et al. (2007) an Allcott (2011) weist, datt d'Opower Experimenter e méi kleng schätzend behandelt Effet haten wéi d'originell Experimentë vu Schultz a Kollegen (1,7% versus 5%).