english: But if we could move charitable giving from two percent of GDP, up just one step to three percent of GDP, by investing in that growth, that would be an extra 150 billion dollars a year in contributions, and if that money could go disproportionately to health and human services charities, because those were the ones we encouraged to invest in their growth, that would represent a tripling of contributions to that sector.
non_english: Ali ako bismo pomerili humanitarna davanja sa dva posto BDP-a za samo jedan prag na tri posto BDP-a, ulažući u razvoj, to bi bilo dodatnih dodatnih 150 milijardi dolara godišnjeg doprinosa, i kada bi taj novac mogao da ode nesrazmerno u dobrotvorne svrhe zdravstva i društvenih službi, jer smo njih podsticali da ulažu u svoj razvoj, to bi predstavljalo trostruke doprinose tom sektoru.