english: So finally that brings us to one more idea: If scientists judge evidence collectively, this has led historians to focus on the question of consensus, and to say that at the end of the day, what science is, what scientific knowledge is, is the consensus of the scientific experts who through this process of organized scrutiny, collective scrutiny, have judged the evidence and come to a conclusion about it, either yea or nay.
non_english: To nas najzad dovodi do još jedne ideje: Ako naučnici kolektivno prosuđuju dokaz, ovo je navelo istoričare da se fokusiraju na pitanje konsenzusa, i da kažu da na kraju dana, ono što je nauka, ono što je naučno znanje, je konsenzus naučnih stručnjaka koji su kroz ovaj proces ogranizovanog posmatranja, kolektivnog posmatranja, presudili dokaze i došli do zaključka, bilo za ili protiv.