english: AG: The answer to the question is hard for me because, on the one hand, I think that we should feel really great about the fact that the Republican nominee -- certain nominee -- John McCain, and both of the finalists for the Democratic nomination -- all three have a very different and forward-leaning position on the climate crisis. All three have offered leadership, and all three are very different from the approach taken by the current administration. And I think that all three have also been responsible in putting forward plans and proposals. But the campaign dialogue that -- as illustrated by the questions -- that was put together by the League of Conservation Voters, by the way, the analysis of all the questions -- and, by the way, the debates have all been sponsored by something that goes by the Orwellian label, "Clean Coal." Has anybody noticed that?
non_english: AG: Teško mi je odgovoriti na ovo pitanje, jer, sa jedne strane, mislim da bi trebalo da se osećamo sjajno zbog činjenice da Republikanski kandidati - određeni kandidat - Džon Mekkejn, i oboje finalista demokratske partije - svo troje imaju različitu i naprednu poziciju o klimatskoj krizi. Svo troje je ponudilo vođstvo, i svo troje imaju različit pristup od pristupa trenutne vlade. Takođe mislim da je svo troje bilo odgovorno u davanju predloga i planova. Ali dijalog u kampanji - ilustrovan ovim pitanjima - koji je sastavila Liga glasača za očuvanje prirode, usput, analiza pitanja, i, usput, sve rasprave je sponzorisalo nešto sa orvelovskim nazivom: "Čist ugljen." Da li je to neko primetio?