Supreme court case which established the clear-and-present danger test for restricting expression?
singleAnswer
Schenck v. United States
Clear and present danger
Supreme court case which established the clear-and-present danger test for restricting expression?
Clear and present danger Freedom of speech in the United States United States free speech exceptions Schenck v. United States Hate speech in the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution Whitney v. California Abrams v. United States Brandenburg v. Ohio Gitlow v. New York
<b>Clear</b> and <b>present danger</b> was a doctrine adopted by the <b>Supreme Court</b> of the 
United States to ... In that <b>case</b>, the Court considered the <b>clear</b> and <b>present</b> 
<b>danger test</b>, but rejected it as too mechanical and instead introduced a balancing 
<b>test</b>. ... the &quot;bad tendency&quot; <b>test</b> which had been <b>established</b> in the 1868 English 
<b>case</b> R. v&nbsp;... In the United States, freedom of speech and <b>expression</b> is strongly protected from 
government <b>restrictions</b> by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, 
many state constitutions, and state and federal laws. The <b>Supreme Court</b> of the 
United States has recognized several categories of ... An example of this is found 
in the United States <b>Supreme Court</b>&#39;s <b>decision</b> in&nbsp;... United States (1919), which held that a &quot;<b>clear</b> and <b>present danger</b>&quot; could justify a 
law <b>limiting</b> speech. The primary distinction is that the latter <b>test</b> does not&nbsp;... Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was a landmark United States 
<b>Supreme Court</b> ... The First Amendment did not alter the well-<b>established</b> law in 
<b>cases</b> where the ... Schenck was the first in a line of <b>Supreme Court cases</b> 
defining the modern ... Court cited Schenck, and the language of &quot;<b>clear</b> and 
<b>present danger</b>&quot;&nbsp;... In 1969, the <b>Supreme Court</b> protected a Ku Klux Klan member&#39;s speech and 
<b>created</b> the &quot;<b>imminent danger</b>&quot; <b>test</b> to determine on what grounds speech can be
&nbsp;... The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents 
the government ... United States (1971), the <b>Supreme Court</b> ruled that the First 
Amendment ... In a series of <b>cases</b> in the first decade of the 2000s—Van Orden v. 
... States, the Court elaborated on the &quot;<b>clear</b> and <b>present danger</b>&quot; <b>test established</b> 
in&nbsp;... Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927), was a United States <b>Supreme Court</b> 
<b>decision</b> ... Implicitly, Brandeis here moves far beyond the &quot;<b>clear</b> and <b>present</b> 
<b>danger</b>&quot; <b>test</b>, and insists on what some have called a ... while they have a right to 
curb truly <b>dangerous expression</b>, they must define <b>clearly</b> the nature of that 
<b>danger</b>. Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919), was a <b>decision</b> by the <b>Supreme</b> 
<b>Court</b> of the ... United States, he stated the famous &quot;<b>clear</b> and <b>present danger</b>&quot; 
standard: ... The best <b>test</b> of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted 
in the ... the Court as a whole to endorse this larger <b>expression</b> in the earlier 
<b>cases</b>. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark United States 
<b>Supreme Court case</b>, ... among <b>Supreme Court</b> justices, ever fully subscribed to, 
namely that the <b>phrase</b> &quot;no law&quot; in the First Amendment ... He briefly traced the 
history of the &quot;<b>clear</b> and <b>present danger</b>&quot; <b>test</b>, illustrating how it had been used 
over the&nbsp;... Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), was a <b>decision</b> by the <b>Supreme Court</b> of 
the United ... In his dissent, Holmes, the author of Schenck&#39;s <b>clear</b> and <b>present</b> 
<b>danger test</b>, wrote that he believed it was still the appropriate <b>test</b> to employ in 
judging the limits of freedom of <b>expression</b>. Joined by Brandeis, he argued that 
Gitlow&nbsp;...
Schenck v. United States
Clear and present danger