<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Thirty years after the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant: historical causes, lessons and legal effects."
Abstract:"The article offers historical, political and legal analysis of the causes that led to the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (NPP) 30 years ago in April 1986. The authors consider a range of health, legal, social and political effects of the accident at the Chernobyl NPP, study the post-accident formation of the environmental rights movement and development of citizens' rights to environmental information enshrined in the 1990s in laws of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, which suffered most from the accident at the Chernobyl NPP. The authors make a number of proposals for development of national and international law that will strengthen the guarantees of environmental human rights and processes of rehabilitation of ecological systems in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia affected by the accident at the Chernobyl NPP. The concept of development of the legal status of environmental refugees and ecological disaster zones is proposed as a separate lesson of the disaster.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

Thirty years after the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant: historical causes, lessons and legal effects
The article offers historical, political and legal analysis of the causes that led to the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (NPP) 30 years ago in April 1986. The authors consider a range of health, legal, social and political effects of the accident at the Chernobyl NPP, study the post-accident formation of the environmental rights movement and development of citizens' rights to environmental information enshrined in the 1990s in laws of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, which suffered most from the accident at the Chernobyl NPP. The authors make a number of proposals for development of national and international law that will strengthen the guarantees of environmental human rights and processes of rehabilitation of ecological systems in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia affected by the accident at the Chernobyl NPP. The concept of development of the legal status of environmental refugees and ecological disaster zones is proposed as a separate lesson of the disaster.