<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"A new landscape for security? Harvesting 'hope' for a better protection of human mobility."
Abstract:"This intervention considers the potential for 'hope' to act as an analytical tool to examine mobility, precariousness and the quest for security in the context of migrants' exploitation, or 'modern-day slavery', in Australia. The image selected depicts a bucolic landscape which elicits a sense of relaxation and connection with our roots. Such a landscape speaks of our ancestry, familiarity, security, and hopes in 'our' territory. Yet this image represents not one but multiple stories. One of these stories connects to experiences of migrants' exploitation, which is unrecognised by those refusing to acknowledge the harsh realities underlying such idealised imagery. This image, in which the worker is not visible but their presence leaves both an economic and non-economic trace in the rural or urban landscapes, also represents the sovereign power of the state. In this context this bucolic landscape is the backdrop for the re-enactment of post-imperialism and post-colonialism, evidenced in the government's securitisation narrative and reinforced through the rhetoric of discontent and distrust for the 'other'. This piece concludes with a reflection on how we can 'practise hope' through rendering visible the invisible and proposes 'hope' as a motivator to link positively human security with human mobility to see such landscape anew.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

A new landscape for security? Harvesting 'hope' for a better protection of human mobility
This intervention considers the potential for 'hope' to act as an analytical tool to examine mobility, precariousness and the quest for security in the context of migrants' exploitation, or 'modern-day slavery', in Australia. The image selected depicts a bucolic landscape which elicits a sense of relaxation and connection with our roots. Such a landscape speaks of our ancestry, familiarity, security, and hopes in 'our' territory. Yet this image represents not one but multiple stories. One of these stories connects to experiences of migrants' exploitation, which is unrecognised by those refusing to acknowledge the harsh realities underlying such idealised imagery. This image, in which the worker is not visible but their presence leaves both an economic and non-economic trace in the rural or urban landscapes, also represents the sovereign power of the state. In this context this bucolic landscape is the backdrop for the re-enactment of post-imperialism and post-colonialism, evidenced in the government's securitisation narrative and reinforced through the rhetoric of discontent and distrust for the 'other'. This piece concludes with a reflection on how we can 'practise hope' through rendering visible the invisible and proposes 'hope' as a motivator to link positively human security with human mobility to see such landscape anew.