<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Trust in Health Information Sources among Underserved and Vulnerable Populations in the U.S."
Abstract:"The purpose of this study was to examine trust in health information sources among underserved and vulnerable populations. Data (N=8,759) were from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Differences were assessed across the following subgroups: ethnoracial minorities, immigrants, rural residence, people with limited English proficiency, and sexual minorities. Trust was highest for doctors, followed by government, family/friends, charities, and religious organizations. In adjusted regression models, trusting health information from charitable and religious organizations was higher in ethnoracial minorities and immigrants. Individuals with limited English proficiency also had higher trust in religious organizations compared with those fluent in English. Trusting health information from doctors was lower among individuals with limited English proficiency. There was evidence in support of additive and multiplicative intersectional frameworks for understanding trust in vulnerable and underserved populations; however, the extent to which differences in trust explain disparities in health behaviors and outcomes should be examined.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

Trust in Health Information Sources among Underserved and Vulnerable Populations in the U.S
The purpose of this study was to examine trust in health information sources among underserved and vulnerable populations. Data (N=8,759) were from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Differences were assessed across the following subgroups: ethnoracial minorities, immigrants, rural residence, people with limited English proficiency, and sexual minorities. Trust was highest for doctors, followed by government, family/friends, charities, and religious organizations. In adjusted regression models, trusting health information from charitable and religious organizations was higher in ethnoracial minorities and immigrants. Individuals with limited English proficiency also had higher trust in religious organizations compared with those fluent in English. Trusting health information from doctors was lower among individuals with limited English proficiency. There was evidence in support of additive and multiplicative intersectional frameworks for understanding trust in vulnerable and underserved populations; however, the extent to which differences in trust explain disparities in health behaviors and outcomes should be examined.