<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"POPULATION DOSES IN RUSSIA FROM PLUTONIUM FALLOUT FOLLOWING THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT."
Abstract:"Estimates are presented of the radiation doses due to plutonium received by people living iii the areas of Russia contaminated as a result of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station. This is based on model representations of the migration of the nuclides in the 'soil-man' system. The effective dose (E) has been examined for the whole population and for the critical group of Inhabitants (agricultural machine operators) in relation to the inhalation of resuspended radionuclides. The calculated irradiation doses were supplemented by values obtained from the determination of the concentration of plutonium isotopes in the main organs and tissues of people living in contaminated areas of the Bryansk region. An analysis of autopsy data gives an unambiguous indication of the existence of 'Chernobyl additions' to the plutonium concentration burden of the inhabitants. It was established that the effective dose values vary within fairly wide limits in different population groups.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

POPULATION DOSES IN RUSSIA FROM PLUTONIUM FALLOUT FOLLOWING THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT
Estimates are presented of the radiation doses due to plutonium received by people living iii the areas of Russia contaminated as a result of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station. This is based on model representations of the migration of the nuclides in the 'soil-man' system. The effective dose (E) has been examined for the whole population and for the critical group of Inhabitants (agricultural machine operators) in relation to the inhalation of resuspended radionuclides. The calculated irradiation doses were supplemented by values obtained from the determination of the concentration of plutonium isotopes in the main organs and tissues of people living in contaminated areas of the Bryansk region. An analysis of autopsy data gives an unambiguous indication of the existence of 'Chernobyl additions' to the plutonium concentration burden of the inhabitants. It was established that the effective dose values vary within fairly wide limits in different population groups.