<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Left Out of Exclusion International Criminal Law and the 'Persecutor Bar' in US Refugee Law."
Abstract:"The United States follows neither the letter nor the spirit of the exclusion clauses of the Refugee Convention and Protocol. The Refugee Act of 1980, which implements US obligations under the Refugee Protocol, does not use the language of Article 1F(a) of the Refugee Convention referring to 'a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity' and omits its reference to international criminal law. As a result, US law excludes those who have ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person on account of any of the five protected Convention grounds. This formulation, known as the 'persecutor bar', raises a number of concerns regarding coherence and fragmentation in international law, consistency between the domestic law of an important country of asylum and its international obligations, and accountability in a regime that does not have a tribunal, expert treaty body, or other independent authority able to articulate a binding interpretation of the law. By analysing 101 US exclusion cases based on the persecutor bar, this article points to a gap in the US approach based on the virtual absence of references to international law sources and suggests the limitations of US jurisprudence in comparison to the approach taken in other common law legal systems.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

Left Out of Exclusion International Criminal Law and the 'Persecutor Bar' in US Refugee Law
The United States follows neither the letter nor the spirit of the exclusion clauses of the Refugee Convention and Protocol. The Refugee Act of 1980, which implements US obligations under the Refugee Protocol, does not use the language of Article 1F(a) of the Refugee Convention referring to 'a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity' and omits its reference to international criminal law. As a result, US law excludes those who have ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person on account of any of the five protected Convention grounds. This formulation, known as the 'persecutor bar', raises a number of concerns regarding coherence and fragmentation in international law, consistency between the domestic law of an important country of asylum and its international obligations, and accountability in a regime that does not have a tribunal, expert treaty body, or other independent authority able to articulate a binding interpretation of the law. By analysing 101 US exclusion cases based on the persecutor bar, this article points to a gap in the US approach based on the virtual absence of references to international law sources and suggests the limitations of US jurisprudence in comparison to the approach taken in other common law legal systems.