<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"An analysis of forced migration from Zimbabwe."
Abstract:"Zimbabwe is rarely considered an important source country of forced migrants. Using data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), this paper shows that Zimbabwe has emerged as one of the leading sources of forced migrants in the post-2000 era. On the other hand, declining economic conditions have led to a large number of people leaving the country thereby generating mixed migration flows. Some economic migrants from Zimbabwe have resorted to applying for asylum in the destination country as a strategy to prolong their stay and avoid deportation to Zimbabwe. As a result, it has become extremely difficult for the asylum and refugee boards to distinguish between forced and economic migrants. The paper raises questions on the effect of geography on the determination of claims of asylum filed by Zimbabweans globally. Closer to home, individuals who file asylum claims have had a lower rate of success compared with those who submit their asylum claims overseas. The paper concludes there is a need to untangle the effect of geography on refugee status determination. There is also a need to ensure that similar measures are applied in the refugee determination process so that geography does not play a significant role in the outcome of asylum applications.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

An analysis of forced migration from Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe is rarely considered an important source country of forced migrants. Using data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), this paper shows that Zimbabwe has emerged as one of the leading sources of forced migrants in the post-2000 era. On the other hand, declining economic conditions have led to a large number of people leaving the country thereby generating mixed migration flows. Some economic migrants from Zimbabwe have resorted to applying for asylum in the destination country as a strategy to prolong their stay and avoid deportation to Zimbabwe. As a result, it has become extremely difficult for the asylum and refugee boards to distinguish between forced and economic migrants. The paper raises questions on the effect of geography on the determination of claims of asylum filed by Zimbabweans globally. Closer to home, individuals who file asylum claims have had a lower rate of success compared with those who submit their asylum claims overseas. The paper concludes there is a need to untangle the effect of geography on refugee status determination. There is also a need to ensure that similar measures are applied in the refugee determination process so that geography does not play a significant role in the outcome of asylum applications.