<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"More than meat: rediscovering the cow beneath the face in urban heritage practice."
Abstract:"I walk fantastically with the cows along the stock route of the former Newmarket saleyards and abattoirs, through what have become the regenerated residential estates of Lynch's Bridge/Kensington Banks in Melbourne, Australia. I challenge the practice of heritage conservation as a closed story of the past 'as it was', which projects a set of sanitised meanings that allow for neither subtext nor counter readings. I problematise the concrete machine of heritage protection utilising Deleuze and Guattari's ideas of faciality, where reassuring mosaic faces of cows going to the saleyards belong, but anguished faces of cows at the slaughterhouse do not. I call upon the cow's face as potential probe head to forge connections between past-present-future in hot heritage practices which challenge people to question their values and actions. Rediscovery of the cow beneath the face at Newmarket saleyards and abattoirs could intervene in people's habitual patterns of thinking and acting, triggering renegotiation of cultural meanings of ethics, welfare, and rights, regarding not only nonhuman animals, but also Othered humans, such as those penned in detention centres. Through experiential experiment rather than controlled interpretation, hot heritage practices may create evental spaces for thinking and acting otherwise.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

More than meat: rediscovering the cow beneath the face in urban heritage practice
I walk fantastically with the cows along the stock route of the former Newmarket saleyards and abattoirs, through what have become the regenerated residential estates of Lynch's Bridge/Kensington Banks in Melbourne, Australia. I challenge the practice of heritage conservation as a closed story of the past 'as it was', which projects a set of sanitised meanings that allow for neither subtext nor counter readings. I problematise the concrete machine of heritage protection utilising Deleuze and Guattari's ideas of faciality, where reassuring mosaic faces of cows going to the saleyards belong, but anguished faces of cows at the slaughterhouse do not. I call upon the cow's face as potential probe head to forge connections between past-present-future in hot heritage practices which challenge people to question their values and actions. Rediscovery of the cow beneath the face at Newmarket saleyards and abattoirs could intervene in people's habitual patterns of thinking and acting, triggering renegotiation of cultural meanings of ethics, welfare, and rights, regarding not only nonhuman animals, but also Othered humans, such as those penned in detention centres. Through experiential experiment rather than controlled interpretation, hot heritage practices may create evental spaces for thinking and acting otherwise.