<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Increases in the seaward river flux of nutrients driven by human migration and land-use changes in the tide-influenced delta."
Abstract:"Most large megacities are located on areas adjacent to tide-influenced deltas. However, contribution of megacities to seaward nutrient fluxes in tide-influenced deltas are poorly quantified in regional and global levels. We analyzed nutrient concentrations and water current data for a large and tide-influenced delta, the Changjiang (Yangtze River) since 1980. Concentrations, species ratios and fluxes of nutrients in tide-influenced delta has been found to differ dramatically from those at upstream. Over the period 2004 to 2015, the seaward nutrient fluxes of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and dissolved silica increased by 5%-10%, but dissolved inorganic phosphorus increased by 15%-20%, in the tide-influenced delta of the Changjiang. Consequently, the DIP/DIN decreases by 11% and DIP/DSi increases by 14% at the river mouth relative to those farther upstream the tidal limit. The legacy and/or recycled contribution accounts for 10%-30% of this increased nutrient flux, hence additional sources are predominantly those involving anthropogenic land-use changes. These findings have implications not only for the Changjiang but also for other riverine systems with respect to management strategy. Nutrient dynamics in tide-influenced deltas near urban areas should receive increased research and policy attention. By not considering nutrient sources in tide-influenced deltas, knowledge of the seaward fluxes and species ratios of nutrients from land sources is incomplete and can be biased, to the point that assessments of their impacts on adjacent marine environments may be inaccurate and mitigation policies therefore ineffective. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

Increases in the seaward river flux of nutrients driven by human migration and land-use changes in the tide-influenced delta
Most large megacities are located on areas adjacent to tide-influenced deltas. However, contribution of megacities to seaward nutrient fluxes in tide-influenced deltas are poorly quantified in regional and global levels. We analyzed nutrient concentrations and water current data for a large and tide-influenced delta, the Changjiang (Yangtze River) since 1980. Concentrations, species ratios and fluxes of nutrients in tide-influenced delta has been found to differ dramatically from those at upstream. Over the period 2004 to 2015, the seaward nutrient fluxes of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and dissolved silica increased by 5%-10%, but dissolved inorganic phosphorus increased by 15%-20%, in the tide-influenced delta of the Changjiang. Consequently, the DIP/DIN decreases by 11% and DIP/DSi increases by 14% at the river mouth relative to those farther upstream the tidal limit. The legacy and/or recycled contribution accounts for 10%-30% of this increased nutrient flux, hence additional sources are predominantly those involving anthropogenic land-use changes. These findings have implications not only for the Changjiang but also for other riverine systems with respect to management strategy. Nutrient dynamics in tide-influenced deltas near urban areas should receive increased research and policy attention. By not considering nutrient sources in tide-influenced deltas, knowledge of the seaward fluxes and species ratios of nutrients from land sources is incomplete and can be biased, to the point that assessments of their impacts on adjacent marine environments may be inaccurate and mitigation policies therefore ineffective. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.