<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Better primary health care for refugees - Catch up immunisation."
Abstract:"Among wealthy nations, most vaccine preventable diseases have become rarities due to childhood immunisation programs. Childhood immunisation programs demand an efficient primary health service, an effective cold chain and access to vaccines. Australia's humanitarian program targets a cohort of people who come from countries in turmoil, often with very poor primary health infrastructure. In the 2004-2005 financial year intake, at least 75% of the 12 096 entrants who arrived in Australia under the offshore resettlement program came from countries with immunisation coverage rates below 50% in the 1990s.(1) A recent survey of African refugees in Melbourne (Victoria) found almost one half of those under 15 years of age were not immune to tetanus or measles.(2) As a general rule, protection against vaccine preventable diseases in refugees appears to increase with age,(3) although among African refugees in Australia, this was not the case for tetanus.(2) This is despite the policy in Afghanistan and many African countries of giving two doses of tetanus toxoid as part of antenatal care.(4).."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

Better primary health care for refugees - Catch up immunisation
Among wealthy nations, most vaccine preventable diseases have become rarities due to childhood immunisation programs. Childhood immunisation programs demand an efficient primary health service, an effective cold chain and access to vaccines. Australia's humanitarian program targets a cohort of people who come from countries in turmoil, often with very poor primary health infrastructure. In the 2004-2005 financial year intake, at least 75% of the 12 096 entrants who arrived in Australia under the offshore resettlement program came from countries with immunisation coverage rates below 50% in the 1990s.(1) A recent survey of African refugees in Melbourne (Victoria) found almost one half of those under 15 years of age were not immune to tetanus or measles.(2) As a general rule, protection against vaccine preventable diseases in refugees appears to increase with age,(3) although among African refugees in Australia, this was not the case for tetanus.(2) This is despite the policy in Afghanistan and many African countries of giving two doses of tetanus toxoid as part of antenatal care.(4).