<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"The USA and the Caribbean Interdiction Program."
Abstract:"The principal focus of this paper is on interdiction at sea, in the Caribbean, by the United States. It is directed against one particular group of boat people - Haitians. There will, however, be some brief references to related United States programs and to US interdiction of non-Haitians. Haitian asylum seekers began arriving in the United States by boat as early as 1963. The numbers started becoming significant in the 1970s and surged dramatically in 1980 and 1981. The Haitians were fleeing persecution, poverty, and in some cases both. In response to the influx, in 1981 President Reagan entered into an agreement with the Haitian government. This paper will discuss the asserted justifications for interdiction, the resulting policy and legal problems, and the consequences of combining interdiction with related non-entree policies, such as detention, expedited removal, and other practices. It will suggest that the combination of measures is more lethal than the sum of its parts, sometimes leaving refugees with no acceptable options. If interdiction must be used, it will be argued, adequate provision for full and fair refugee status determinations is critical.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

The USA and the Caribbean Interdiction Program
The principal focus of this paper is on interdiction at sea, in the Caribbean, by the United States. It is directed against one particular group of boat people - Haitians. There will, however, be some brief references to related United States programs and to US interdiction of non-Haitians. Haitian asylum seekers began arriving in the United States by boat as early as 1963. The numbers started becoming significant in the 1970s and surged dramatically in 1980 and 1981. The Haitians were fleeing persecution, poverty, and in some cases both. In response to the influx, in 1981 President Reagan entered into an agreement with the Haitian government. This paper will discuss the asserted justifications for interdiction, the resulting policy and legal problems, and the consequences of combining interdiction with related non-entree policies, such as detention, expedited removal, and other practices. It will suggest that the combination of measures is more lethal than the sum of its parts, sometimes leaving refugees with no acceptable options. If interdiction must be used, it will be argued, adequate provision for full and fair refugee status determinations is critical.