<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"New urbanism and race: An analysis of neighborhood racial change in suburban Atlanta."
Abstract:"Since 2000, local governments, planning agencies, and private development firms have sought to revitalize aging spaces in Atlanta's suburbs by experimenting with new urbanist (re) development projects. Proponents of this strategy have lauded the potential of these projects to enhance social integration between people of diverse ages, races, and incomes. However, critics argue that, in practice, new urbanism has often failed to substantially increase racial/ethnic and socioeconomic diversity and may even facilitate residential segregation and displacement. This research contributes to these debates by using linear regressions to analyze how new urbanist projects constructed between 2000 and 2013 in Atlanta's suburban town centers have impacted racial change in the neighborhoods where they have been built. Results suggest that new urbanist project construction is significantly correlated with declining Hispanic populations and increasing White populations, supporting arguments that theorize new urbanism as a tool to effectively whiten select spaces.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

New urbanism and race: An analysis of neighborhood racial change in suburban Atlanta
Since 2000, local governments, planning agencies, and private development firms have sought to revitalize aging spaces in Atlanta's suburbs by experimenting with new urbanist (re) development projects. Proponents of this strategy have lauded the potential of these projects to enhance social integration between people of diverse ages, races, and incomes. However, critics argue that, in practice, new urbanism has often failed to substantially increase racial/ethnic and socioeconomic diversity and may even facilitate residential segregation and displacement. This research contributes to these debates by using linear regressions to analyze how new urbanist projects constructed between 2000 and 2013 in Atlanta's suburban town centers have impacted racial change in the neighborhoods where they have been built. Results suggest that new urbanist project construction is significantly correlated with declining Hispanic populations and increasing White populations, supporting arguments that theorize new urbanism as a tool to effectively whiten select spaces.