<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Stigma and exile (Refugees, stereotypes, projection)."
Abstract:"This paper analyses the processes of projection and stereotyping that are linked to this situation of exile. My attempt is to convey the experiences underwent in the course of fulfilling the field researches (from 1993 till now) carried out partly within the project The Study and Care of Refugee Families--A Pilot Study of Anthropological and Psychodynamic Aspects (UNESCO participation Project no. 9254-1994). It appears that there are many notions of what refugees and displaced persons should need, possess or even how they should look like. As for many other stigmatized groups, they often are effected by actions that carry the polarity 'us' and 'them'. At least, that is the message that one can pick up in the world-wide media bombardment over their well-being, as well as from many other documents of highly recognizable and dedicated sources. However, this paper is not based on the critique of this level, but is rather focused on the self- critique of the author, initiated by the notion that we must first become aware of the ways in which we, ourselves, stereotype people in order to, later on, scientifically analyze this occurrence. Additionally, the stereotypes that a scientist or a lay person may hold, whether or not they are supported by so called 'scientific' evidence, are highly dangerous to the addressed groups, whether in an actual or metaphorical exile. Thus, the process of my continuous fieldwork that, initially aimed at other objectives, resulted instead in a self critique and analysis and the awareness that the process of stereotyping is daily phenomena, within each of our lives, that is much more dynamic in our own processes of thought, than is often admitted. Hence, the question we can jointly address is--what does it take to correct our own emotional 'eyes' as those of the beholder?."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

Stigma and exile (Refugees, stereotypes, projection)
This paper analyses the processes of projection and stereotyping that are linked to this situation of exile. My attempt is to convey the experiences underwent in the course of fulfilling the field researches (from 1993 till now) carried out partly within the project The Study and Care of Refugee Families--A Pilot Study of Anthropological and Psychodynamic Aspects (UNESCO participation Project no. 9254-1994). It appears that there are many notions of what refugees and displaced persons should need, possess or even how they should look like. As for many other stigmatized groups, they often are effected by actions that carry the polarity 'us' and 'them'. At least, that is the message that one can pick up in the world-wide media bombardment over their well-being, as well as from many other documents of highly recognizable and dedicated sources. However, this paper is not based on the critique of this level, but is rather focused on the self- critique of the author, initiated by the notion that we must first become aware of the ways in which we, ourselves, stereotype people in order to, later on, scientifically analyze this occurrence. Additionally, the stereotypes that a scientist or a lay person may hold, whether or not they are supported by so called 'scientific' evidence, are highly dangerous to the addressed groups, whether in an actual or metaphorical exile. Thus, the process of my continuous fieldwork that, initially aimed at other objectives, resulted instead in a self critique and analysis and the awareness that the process of stereotyping is daily phenomena, within each of our lives, that is much more dynamic in our own processes of thought, than is often admitted. Hence, the question we can jointly address is--what does it take to correct our own emotional 'eyes' as those of the beholder?