<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"A SURVEY OF PUBLIC-ATTITUDES TOWARD EPILEPSY IN 1979 WITH AN INDICATION OF TRENDS OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS."
Abstract:"At 5 yr intervals during the past 30 yr, the American Institute of Public Opinion obtained answers to questions about epilepsy from representative members of the adult population throughout the USA. Knowledge of epilepsy was found in 90-95% of the people interviewed. When those familiar with epilepsy were asked whether they object to their children playing with epileptics, the upward trend in those without objections from 1949-1979 was 57, 68, 67, 77, 81, 84-89%. When asked if they thought epilepsy was a form of insanity, the trend in those who did not was: 59, 68, 74, 79, 81, 86-92%. When asked if epileptics should be employed the affirmative answers increased with the following variations: 45, 60, 75, 82, 76, 81-79%. The adverse responses were proportionately reduced. In each of the 7 surveys the most favorable opinion was among the better educated, better employed, younger and urban members of the population. The states in the eastern, midwestern and western regions initially showed less prejudice than those in the southern region. Now there is greater uniformity in opinion throughout the nation. Factors contributing to the more enlightened opinion include educational efforts by professional and lay societies regarding epilepsy, improved control of seizures, employment by a number of major industries of individuals with a history of attacks; and more reasonable legal regulations concerning immigration, marriage and the operation of motor vehicles.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

A SURVEY OF PUBLIC-ATTITUDES TOWARD EPILEPSY IN 1979 WITH AN INDICATION OF TRENDS OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS
At 5 yr intervals during the past 30 yr, the American Institute of Public Opinion obtained answers to questions about epilepsy from representative members of the adult population throughout the USA. Knowledge of epilepsy was found in 90-95% of the people interviewed. When those familiar with epilepsy were asked whether they object to their children playing with epileptics, the upward trend in those without objections from 1949-1979 was 57, 68, 67, 77, 81, 84-89%. When asked if they thought epilepsy was a form of insanity, the trend in those who did not was: 59, 68, 74, 79, 81, 86-92%. When asked if epileptics should be employed the affirmative answers increased with the following variations: 45, 60, 75, 82, 76, 81-79%. The adverse responses were proportionately reduced. In each of the 7 surveys the most favorable opinion was among the better educated, better employed, younger and urban members of the population. The states in the eastern, midwestern and western regions initially showed less prejudice than those in the southern region. Now there is greater uniformity in opinion throughout the nation. Factors contributing to the more enlightened opinion include educational efforts by professional and lay societies regarding epilepsy, improved control of seizures, employment by a number of major industries of individuals with a history of attacks; and more reasonable legal regulations concerning immigration, marriage and the operation of motor vehicles.