<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Lower incidence of hip fractures among elderly Ethiopian immigrants to Israel: first assessment from the Israel National Trauma Registry (INTR) 2011-2020."
Abstract:"The incidence hip fractures (HF) among Ethiopian immigrants is unknown. In Israel, the incidence of HF among Ethiopian immigrants aged >= 50 years between 2011 and 2020 was lower than in the general Israeli population, but possibly on the rise. These data should be confirmed in other countries where the Ethiopian diaspora has settled.PurposeThe incidence of osteoporotic fractures in the aging Ethiopian population that immigrated to Western countries has not been reported. This study sought to provide a first assessment of the incidence of hip fractures in Ethiopian immigrants in Israel, as a proxy for osteoporosis in this population.MethodsThis is an epidemiologic study of the incidence of hip fractures (HF) in people aged >= 50 years in Israel, between 2011 and 2020. Data were extracted from the Israel National Trauma Registry (INTR). Annual age-adjusted HF incidence rates (IR), and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) among Ethiopian-born (EB) relative to non-EB subjects (others) were computed.ResultsDuring the study period, among subjects age >= 50 in the INTR, only 20.1% of the EB suffered a HF, in contrast to 32.3% of subjects from other origins (P < 0.0001). Although EB subjects were generally younger than their non-EB counterparts, the age at which they sustained a HF was similar: 80.45 +/- 11.7 years for EB vs. 79.44 +/- 10.32 years, P = 0.19. EB men were more likely to sustain a HF, as they represented 41.8% of all HF in their respective group, in comparison with 33.6% for others (P = 0.02). Annual IR of HF were lower for EB subjects throughout the study. Despite an initial rise in the SIR, these were also lower for most of the period.ConclusionsIn Israel, EB subjects >= 50 years still enjoy protection from HF. Our data require confirmation from other Western countries where the Ethiopian diaspora is aging. If a secular upward trend is observed, contributing risk factors should be identified to enable preventative measures.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

Lower incidence of hip fractures among elderly Ethiopian immigrants to Israel: first assessment from the Israel National Trauma Registry (INTR) 2011-2020
The incidence hip fractures (HF) among Ethiopian immigrants is unknown. In Israel, the incidence of HF among Ethiopian immigrants aged >= 50 years between 2011 and 2020 was lower than in the general Israeli population, but possibly on the rise. These data should be confirmed in other countries where the Ethiopian diaspora has settled.PurposeThe incidence of osteoporotic fractures in the aging Ethiopian population that immigrated to Western countries has not been reported. This study sought to provide a first assessment of the incidence of hip fractures in Ethiopian immigrants in Israel, as a proxy for osteoporosis in this population.MethodsThis is an epidemiologic study of the incidence of hip fractures (HF) in people aged >= 50 years in Israel, between 2011 and 2020. Data were extracted from the Israel National Trauma Registry (INTR). Annual age-adjusted HF incidence rates (IR), and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) among Ethiopian-born (EB) relative to non-EB subjects (others) were computed.ResultsDuring the study period, among subjects age >= 50 in the INTR, only 20.1% of the EB suffered a HF, in contrast to 32.3% of subjects from other origins (P < 0.0001). Although EB subjects were generally younger than their non-EB counterparts, the age at which they sustained a HF was similar: 80.45 +/- 11.7 years for EB vs. 79.44 +/- 10.32 years, P = 0.19. EB men were more likely to sustain a HF, as they represented 41.8% of all HF in their respective group, in comparison with 33.6% for others (P = 0.02). Annual IR of HF were lower for EB subjects throughout the study. Despite an initial rise in the SIR, these were also lower for most of the period.ConclusionsIn Israel, EB subjects >= 50 years still enjoy protection from HF. Our data require confirmation from other Western countries where the Ethiopian diaspora is aging. If a secular upward trend is observed, contributing risk factors should be identified to enable preventative measures.