<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"To Rescue, Not Return: An International Human Rights Approach to Protecting Child Economic Migrants Seeking Refuge in the United States."
Abstract:"This Note explores the plight of unaccompanied alien children seeking refuge in the United States from economic deprivations in their countries of origin. It argues that, in light of international human rights norms, the bias in U.S. refugee law against the protection of economic rights constitutes a barrier to sensible policy reform regarding this refugee population. Part II of this Note explains how child refugees fleeing situations of severe deprivation of their basic economic rights (Such as the rights to adequate food, shelter, education, and medical care), without more, fail to state a claim for relief within the current U.S. refugee protection and immigration schemes. Part III explores the bias in U.S. refugee law toward providing protection for political and civil rights to the exclusion of economic and social rights. It points to international human rights instruments and principles that, by contrast, strongly support the recognition of certain economic rights as fundamental human rights, especially within the context of the internationally acknowledged necessity for heightened safeguards to protect children. Part IV suggests a novel, aspirational approach for the protection of children: amending the United States' statutory definition of refugee to explicitly conceptualize violations of children's economic rights as persecution on the basis of membership in a particular social group.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

To Rescue, Not Return: An International Human Rights Approach to Protecting Child Economic Migrants Seeking Refuge in the United States
This Note explores the plight of unaccompanied alien children seeking refuge in the United States from economic deprivations in their countries of origin. It argues that, in light of international human rights norms, the bias in U.S. refugee law against the protection of economic rights constitutes a barrier to sensible policy reform regarding this refugee population. Part II of this Note explains how child refugees fleeing situations of severe deprivation of their basic economic rights (Such as the rights to adequate food, shelter, education, and medical care), without more, fail to state a claim for relief within the current U.S. refugee protection and immigration schemes. Part III explores the bias in U.S. refugee law toward providing protection for political and civil rights to the exclusion of economic and social rights. It points to international human rights instruments and principles that, by contrast, strongly support the recognition of certain economic rights as fundamental human rights, especially within the context of the internationally acknowledged necessity for heightened safeguards to protect children. Part IV suggests a novel, aspirational approach for the protection of children: amending the United States' statutory definition of refugee to explicitly conceptualize violations of children's economic rights as persecution on the basis of membership in a particular social group.