<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are an expert on climate change, human mobility and migration. Answer the question truthfully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>Here are the title and abstract of a scientific paper probably related to climate change, human mobility and migration..
Title:"Understanding Household Subsistence Activities in Neolithic Inner Mongolia, China: Functional Analyses of Stone Tools."
Abstract:"This study attempts to reconstruct household subsistence activities in order to understand the socioeconomic strategies adapted by the earliest Neolithic populations in south-central Inner Mongolia during the fifth millennium bc. These people are likely to have originated in the Yangshao culture in the Central Plain, where millet-based agriculture was already established. We conducted residue and use-wear analyses on the most recurrent tool types found in residential areas, including grinding stones, spades, and knives. The results suggest that the Yangshao culture migrants adapted to a local foraging tradition, involving hunting large animals and collecting/cultivating diverse plant foods, mainly tubers and roots. They also maintained their Neolithic technology and probably social organization and household structure, as indicated by the presence of Neolithic toolkits, pottery, domesticates, and house structures. Contrary to previous assumptions, domesticated cereals, such as millets and Job's tears, account for very small proportions of the plant foods used. The local hunting-gathering populations, likely represented by the microlithic tradition in the archaeological record, may have integrated with the Neolithic migrants and played an important role in the formation of the new subsistence strategies.."
I have six questions you need to answer.
Q1: Is this article is about 'human migration mobility': 1 = yes; 0 = no. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q2: What drivers of migration and mobility does the article study? 0 = 'other', 1 = 'climate', 2 = 'environment', 3 = 'economic', 4 = 'conflict', 5 = 'political', 6 = 'social', 7 = 'family'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q3: What is the overall sentiment of the article?:0 = 'neutral', 1 = 'negative', 2 = 'positive'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q4: What type of climate or environmental keywords are explicitly mentioned?:  0 = 'none', 1 = 'algal blooms', 2 = 'infestation', 3 = 'infectious diseases', 4 = 'ocean acidification', 5 = 'sea ice', 6 = 'acid rain', 7 = 'drought', 8 = 'cold wave', 9 = 'heat wave', 10 = 'glacial', 11 = 'wildfire', 12 = 'air pollution', 13 = 'biodiversity loss', 14 = 'coastal erosion', 15 = 'land degradation', 16 = 'deforestation', 17 = 'desertification', 18 = 'water pollution', 19 = 'diebacks', 20 = 'permafrost loss', 21 = 'sand mining', 22 = 'sea level rise', 23 = 'earthquake', 24 = 'tsunami', 25 = 'volcanic', 26 = 'flood', 27 = 'avalanche', 28 = 'landslide', 29 = 'downburst', 30 = 'thunderstorm', 31 = 'sandstorm', 32 = 'haze', 33 = 'storm', 34 = 'cyclone', 35 = 'blizzard', 36 = 'hail', 37 = 'snow', 38 = 'tornado', 39 = 'wind', 40 = 'hurricane', 41 = 'typhoon', 42 = 'other'. Answer with a number or a sequence of numbers separated by commas. Do not give a textual explanation. 

Q5: What discipline does the article belong to?: 0 = 'other', 1 = 'social science', 2 = 'natural science', 3 = 'arts and humanities', 4 = 'multidiscipline and interdiscipline'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Q6: Does the article apply quantitative and/or statistical analysis?: 0 = 'no', 1 = 'yes'. Answer with a number. Do not give a textual explanation.

Use the following template: 

Q1 = [];
Q2 = [];
Q3 = [];
Q4 = [];
Q5 = [];
Q6 = [].<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>Answer:

Understanding Household Subsistence Activities in Neolithic Inner Mongolia, China: Functional Analyses of Stone Tools
This study attempts to reconstruct household subsistence activities in order to understand the socioeconomic strategies adapted by the earliest Neolithic populations in south-central Inner Mongolia during the fifth millennium bc. These people are likely to have originated in the Yangshao culture in the Central Plain, where millet-based agriculture was already established. We conducted residue and use-wear analyses on the most recurrent tool types found in residential areas, including grinding stones, spades, and knives. The results suggest that the Yangshao culture migrants adapted to a local foraging tradition, involving hunting large animals and collecting/cultivating diverse plant foods, mainly tubers and roots. They also maintained their Neolithic technology and probably social organization and household structure, as indicated by the presence of Neolithic toolkits, pottery, domesticates, and house structures. Contrary to previous assumptions, domesticated cereals, such as millets and Job's tears, account for very small proportions of the plant foods used. The local hunting-gathering populations, likely represented by the microlithic tradition in the archaeological record, may have integrated with the Neolithic migrants and played an important role in the formation of the new subsistence strategies.