When  a  wreck  may  be  considered  a  total  loss.  Ionides  v.  Univ.  Marine  Ins.
Co.,  cviii.  259 ;  14  C.  B.  N.  S.  259.
But  when  the  surrounding  circumstances  show  that  a  part  could  have  been
saved  it  is  only  a  partial  loss.     Ibid.
Where  there  is  a  clause  against  particular  average,  expenses  incurred  to  take
the  goods  safely  to  port  cannot  be  recovered,  under  that  clause.  G.  I.  P.  Rail-
way Co.  v.  Saunders,  ex.  266 ;  2  B.  &  S.  266.
It  makes  no  difference  whether  freight  was  prepaid  or  to  be  earned.     Ibid.
Subject  considered  in  Am.  Ed.  note.     Ibid.
In  deciding  whether  cost  of  repairs  will  exceed  value  of  vessel  when  repaired,
the  real  value  of  vessel  must  be  taken.  If  it  will  not,  it  is  not  a  constructive
total  loss.     Grainger  v.  Martin,  ex.  456  ;  2  B.  &  S.  456.
Affirmed  in  Exchequer  Chamber,  cxvi.  9 ;  4  B.  &  S.  9.
What  constitutes  real  value.     Ibid.
Subject  considered  in  Am.  Ed.  note.     Ibid.
Where  notice  of  abandonment  given  by  mere  pledgee  of  insurance  policy,  as
security  for  money,  it  will  not  be  a  total  loss.  Jardine  v.  Leathley,  cxiii.  700 ;  3
B.  &  S.  700.
A  clause  in  marine  policy  "  to  pay  a  loss  thirty  days  after  receipt  of  official
news  of  capture  or  embargo,  without  waiting  for  condemnation,"  will  make
defendants  liable,  as  for  a  total  loss,  thirty  days  after  receipt  of  such  news.
Fowler  v.  Insurance  Co.,  cxiv.  818  ;  18  C.  B.  N.  S.  818.
And  it  will  make  no  difference  that  the  vessel  was  afterwards  restored  and
arrived  safely  in  London.    Ibid.
