Co.  V.  Riley,  1  Giffi  371 ;  see  Lee  v.  Howlett,  2  K.  &  J.  531),
or  of  portions  directed  to  be  raised  by  means  of  a  term,  or
generally  of  any  charge  which  can  only  reach  the  person  en-
titled in  the  shape  of  money.  Re  Hughes,  2  H.  &  M.  89,  in
which  Foster  v.  Cockerell,  sup.,  is  explained,  and  the  dis-
tinction pointed  out  between  cases  of  this  description  and
cases  of  equitable  mortgages  giving  an  actual  estate  or  inte-
rest in  the  land.  See  Barnes  v.  Pinkney,  36  L.  J.,  Ch.
815.  The  deposit  of  a  colonial  land  order  does  not  require
notice  to  be  given  to  the  company  issuing  it.  Ex  parte
Barnett,  De  G.  194;  see  Rooper  v.  Harrison,  2  K.  &  J.  86.
stop  order.
Notice  to  trustees
before  paj'raeut
into  court.
Distringas.
Fund  in  Court.l  Where  the  subject-matter  of  the  mort-
gage is  a  fund  in  court,  a  stop  order,  that  the  fund  shall  not
be  transferred  without  notice  to  the  mortgagee,  is  usually
obtained  and  entered  at  the  office  of  the  accountant-general.
This  is  equivalent  to  notice  to  the  trustees  of  a  fund.  The
stop  order  gives  priority.  Greening  v.  Beckford,  5  Sim.
195;  Swayne  v.  Swayne,  11  Bea.  463.  It  also  prevented
the  fund  from  passing  to  the  assignees  of  the  mortgagor  in  the
event  of  his  bankruptcy,  as  being  in  his  order  and  disposi-
tion. Bartlett  v.  Bartlett,  1  De  G.  &  J.  127;  see  now  ante,
p.  649.  Mere  notice  to  the  accountant-general  is  not  equi-
valent to  a  stop  order.  Warburton  v.  Hill,  Kay,  470.  The
lien  of  a  solicitor  on  a  fund  recovered  by  him  (23  &  24  Vict.
