scribed bev.iaa.s, while .i, ,
tions of the law were f.trinirenilv en
forced, he claim.-.1. . it u|V,1
species of class leai lation in which
the poor and lowly en.uau<>d in boot
Vffpinp were "p.-r.-. ut- .l, while \ io
lators In more fortunate circuinstanccs
were pive:i ti'ntporary inin !itiit?>. In
approving this . . M:\ 'itr.nhs '
\ charged. I t ? i ,?.,|
l^is oath ot oil:. . ||, k. .1 i ,.
crnor to i en '.in-.
In political ,- lo ally ;i..,i
the State, th- 1'.;inUs . . v. ..
/elved with pood humored interest \
a member of tlx i.. pislalun Mr. Hank?
?was allied with the "wet" whip ..Mi
his protestations In favor of ..u im
partial administration of t; . pro , |
tion law w. i, uowlii i.i; . i) to,, . ii
olisly. The ?;????!?!!?>!? If i: ? to ,\i;.
Batiks exp:.< o .i ?
not warrant tin iliM-iplhiitip supuest
cd. and tha t n?. . , v : i . ,
Accord! tip in i-.t' p.its ..dm
Norfolk. Mr. I;.nii;? h.i j. i,..
In preferrlnp chnrp.'s apaln-:i Coininls
sioner Peters h. t....i , -1. t.
a plan for fot nun- ?? \ ,
ty Leaptic. ?l?(licated ? ?? t. . t.,- . f
securing a prop. . . nf , . m i- ..f the
prohibition l.?\\:? m-ii . ,<? . .. ..
tion where il>< > ? : n ? oi t
crty of i he mi n i|i a i
TO PRESENT PORTRAIT
liar \--<M'i;iiiii? Will t
I .ale .luil..i* W t*llli?i*<| In i i ???nil
< mirt I ??-! >ji ?.
JTlie port hi M ot the kit- .1 tnip.r isiiy
erle\ l: \\ , . p., | I., ...
