^  But  see,  and  query,  Reg.  v.  Gisson,  The  State,  36  Ind.  280;  Keg.  v.  Smith,

2  Car.  &  K.  781 ;  Reg.  v.  Henderson,  Car.  34  U.  C.  Q.  B.  552 ;  Canada  v.  Common-

&  M.  328.     See  Reg.  v.  Bird,  2  Eng.  L.  wealth,  22  Grat.  899 ;  The  State  v.  Smith,

&  Eq.  448,  2  Den.  C.  C.  94,  5  Cox  C.  C.  43  Vt.  324,  326 ;  Reg.  v.  Webster,  9  L.
20.  '  Canada,  196 ;  The  State  v.  Pitts,  57  Misso.
3  See  post,  §  1057  et  seq.  85;  Fritz  w.The  State, 40 Ind.  18;  Wemyss

«  Ante,  §  780.  v.  Hopkins,  Law  Rep.  10  Q.  B.  378 ;  Mnn-

5  Ante,  §  794 ;  The  State  v.  Standifer,  ford  v.  The  State,  39  Missis.  558  ;  The

5  Port.  523 ;  Rex  v.  Heaps,  2  Salk.  693 ;  State  ».  Brannon,  55  Misso.  63 ;  Reg.  v.
Reg.  V.  Gould,  9  Car.  &  P.  364 ;  Reg.  v.  Elrington,  9  Cox  C.  C.  86,  90.
Bird,  2  Eng.  L.  &  Eq.  448,  2  Den.  C.  C.         «  Stat.  Crimes,  §  1018,  1035.
94,  5  Cox  C.  C.  20;  Dinkey  u.  Common-         '  The  State  v.  Nutt,  28  Vt.  598,  602,

wealth,  5  Harris,  Pa.  126 ;   Murphy  u.  603.     Contra,  post,  §  1005.
Commonwealth,  23  Grat.  960;  Thomas

VOL.  I.  38  593


§  1057  CONSEQUENCES.  [BOOK  Vm.
