a  railway  company.     M.  of  Salisbury  v.  G.  N.  Railway  Co.,  xciv.  174  ;  5  C.  B.
N.  S.  174.
Sect.  124  of  8  &  9  Vict.  c.  20,  does  not  prevent  ejectment  but  authorizes  the
company  to  have  execution  restrained.     Ibid.
The  terminus  where  the  general  business  is  done,  secretary  resides,  and  orders
are  issued,  is  the  only  "  principal  office,"  within  sect.  138  of  8  &  9  Vict.  c.  20.
Garton  v.  G.  W.  Railway  Co.,  xcvi.  837  ;  E.,  B.  &  E.  837.
By-law  of  a  railway  company,  pursuant  to  8  &  9  Vict.,  is  a  public  document,
a  certified  copy  of  which  is  admissible  in  evidence,  under  14  &  15  Vict.  c.  99,
s.  14.     Motteram  v.  Railway  Co.,  xcvii.  58  ;  7  C.  B.  N.  S.  58.
Under  sect.  109  of  8  &  9  Vict.  c.  20,  it  is  sufficient  to  prove  that  copies  of  a
by-law  imposing  the  penalty  were  posted  at  the  stations  at  which  the  passenger
entered  and  left  the  train.     Ibid.
Under  sect.  68  of  8  &  9  Vict.  c.  20,  railway  companies  are  bound  to  maintain
fences  strong  enough  to  keep  sheep  and  cattle  from  straying  out  of  adjoining
lands.     Bessant  v.  G.  W.  Railway  Co.,  xcviii.  368 ;  8  C.  B.  N.  S.  368.
Railway  company  not  bound,  under  8  &  9  Vict.  c.  20,  to  fence  between  its  road
and  a  tramway,  also  its  own.  Marfell  v.  S.  W.  Railway  Co,  xcviii.  525 ;  8  C.  B.
N.  S.  525.
But  where  it  permits  the  use  of  such  tramway  for  hire,  it  is  liable  for  negli-
gence in  letting  a  gate  remain  open  between  the  tramway  and  the  road.     Ibid.
