Lord  Howe,  4  Bro.  Ch.  K.  223  ;  Meacher  v.  Toung,  2  Mylne  and  Keen,  R.490 ;
Bruin  v.  Knott,  1  Phillips,  Ch.  K.  572 ;  Rice  v.  Tonnele,  4  Sandford,  Ch.  R.  568.
In  re  Burke,  Id.  617.
1  See  Carmichael  v.  Hughes,  6  Eng.  Law  &  Eq.  R.  71.  See  also  Stopford  v.
Lord  Canterbury,  11  Sim.  82  ;  Bruin  v.  Knott,  1  Phill.  572.
2  Stephens  v.  James,  1  Mylne  &  Keen,  627 ;  Logan  v.  Parlie,  Jacob,  R.  193 ;
Jackson  v.  Hankey,  Jacob,  R.  265 ;  cited  also  in  1  Mylrie  &  Keen,  627.
3  1  Fonbl.  Eq.  B.  2,  ch.  2,  §  1,  note  (d)  ;  Harvey  v.  Harvey,  2  P.  Will.  21,
22 ;  Lanoy  v.  Duke  of  Athol,  2  Atk.  447  ;  Petre  v.  Petre,  3  Afk.  511 ;  Burnet
V.  Burnet,  1  Bro.  Ch.  R.  179,  and  Mr.  Belt's  note.
*  Roach  V.  Garvan,  1  Ves.  160 ;  Bradshaw  v.  Bradshaw,  1  Jac.  &  W.  647  ;
1  Madd.  Ch.  Pr.  275,  276  ;  Heysham  v.  Heysham,  1  Cox,  R.  179  ;  Allen  v.
Coster,  1  Beavan,  R.  201.
