No  justification  of  a  sheriff  in  case  for  not  arresting,  that  after  he  had  arrested
under  an  invalid  writ  he  endeavored  to  hold  under  the  valid  writ  but  defendant
was  discharged.     Hooper  v.  Lane,  xcii.  1095  ;  8  E.  &  B.  1095.
One  who  employs  a  carrier  to  convey  a  dangerous  package,  must  inform  him
of  its  character,  or  he  will  be  responsible  for  any  injury  which  may  result  to  the
carrier  or  his  servants,  from  his  omission.  Farrant  v.  Barnes,  ciii.  553  ;  11  C.
B.  N.  S.  553.
It  is  the  proper  form  of  action  against  a  carrier  for  breach  of  his  duty,  to
safely  carry  and  deliver  goods.  Tattan  o.  G.  W.  Railway  Co.,  cv.  844 ;  2  E.  &
E.  844.
Master  liable  to  servant  while  working  with  him  for  injury  occurring  to  him,
through  negligence  of  master.     Ashworth  v.  Stanwix,  cvii.  702 ;  3  E.  &  E.  702.
Partner  of  master  so  working  also  liable.     Ibid.
Doctrine  of  negligence  of  fellow  servant  does  not  apply  in  such  case.     Ibid.
Attorney  without  express  instructions,  compromising  case,  not  liable -where
reasonable  care  and  skill  have  been  used.  Chown  v.  Parrott,  cviii.  74 ;  14  C.  B.
N.  S.  74.
An  action  will  lie  for  maliciously  and  without  reasonable  and  probable  cause
setting  the  law  in  motion  to  the  damage  of  another.  Castrique  v.  Behrens,  cvii.
709  ;  3  E.  &  E.  709.
But  it  must  be  shown  that  the  cause  has  terminated  in  favor  of  the  party  suing.
Ibid.
And  the  same  rule  applies  when  a  judgment  in  rem  unreversed  has  been  re-
covered in  a  foreign  tribunal.    Ibid.
Unless,  perhaps,  the  plaintiff,  whose  rights  were  affected,  could  not  have  inter-
vened and  had  no  opportunity  to  appear.     Ibid.
