Signed,  Hubert,  Honey  &  Gendron,  P.S.C."  Held,  on  motion  to  quash
appeal,  that  the  deposit  of  the  sum  of  $500,  in  the  hands  of  the  prothono-
tary  of  the  court  below,  made  by  appellant,  without  a  certificate  that  it  was
made  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  court  appealed  from,  or  any  of  its  judges,  was
ijugatory  and  ineffectual  as  security  for  the  costs  of  the  appeal.
Per  Taschereau  J, — ^The  case  should  be  sent  back  to  the  court  below  in
order  that  a  proper  certificate  might  be  obtained.
Per  Strong  and  Taschereau  JJ. — That  an  appeal  does  not  lie  from  the
Court  of  Review  (P.Q.)  to  the  Supreme  Court  of  Canada.    Henry  J.  contra.
The  appeal  was  quashed  with  costs,  which  included  the  general  costs  of
respondent  up  to  time  motion  made.  The  full  fee  of  $25  was  taxed  by  the
Registrar  on  hearing  of  motion.  This  was  increased  by  fiat  of  Foumier  J.  to  $100.
Mcdonald  v.  Ibbott.-iU,  278.
103.  Security,  allowance  of— Orders  made  by  court  below  after.
Orders  made  in  a  cause  by  the  court  below  after  the  allowance  of  the
appeal  and  giving  of  the  security  disregarded  by  the  Supreme  Court.
lakln  T.  linttall.-Jll,  691.
104.  Security— Allowance  of— Judge  of  court  below  functus  officio.
When  a  judge  of  the  court  below  has  made  an  order  allowing  the
security,  he  is  functus  officio,  and  the  appeal  is  then  subject  to  the  jurisdic-
tion of  the  Supreme  Court^.  No  application  can  be  made  to  the  judge  or  the
full  court  below  to  rescind  the  order.  Any  application  must  be  thereafter
made  to  the  Supreme  Court  or  a  judge  thereof.
Walmesly  v.  Orlfflths  — 7tli  Decemlier,  1885.
405
Practice — Continued.
105.  Secnrity— Allowance  of— A  stay  of  proceedings  in  conrt  below— Costs.
