Now,  in  the  present  case,  conceding,  for  the  sake  of  argument,  that  the  share-
holders could  not  be  compelled  to  contribute  beyond  £50  a  share,  and  did  no
wrong  in  declining  to  make  advances  beyond  that  sum,  yet  the  result  of  all  the
circumstances-  of  this  case  appears  to  have  been,  that  the  mine  could  not  be  car-
ried on  without  farther  outlay.    The  plaintiffs  objected  to  this  farther  outlay ;


684


EQUITY    JURISPRUDENCE.  [CH.    XXXIV.
