Tarpde + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +etce. +
[HT


| |
rédda TH peyada TO uéya Go w. GAO





bbe dbo pie
Here the new péya does not arise in each case
from a fresh generalization based on a new set of
The latter are supposed to be
exhausted in the first view—émi wdvra idévte—and
the only new element at each step is the 7d péya
just previously reached. In this way not only does
the process never end, but it is unfruitful in another
sense. Each fresh judgment is what Kant calls
analytic, not synthetic. All the evidence was led
when the first was formed; in going on to a second
and a third you add to that evidence merely a
synopsis of itself. We may compare here—although
it is used rather of the countless types of eid» than
of the countless replicas of one—the language of
Arist. already quoted, Met. 1. 9, 990 b 1, ¢yrotvres


Rs cae Bi ates Wey g ey oh ; “4
twvdt tov dvtov AaPeiv Tas aitias érepa Totros toa


rdAha 7a peydra,


Tov dpiOpov éxdpucav, Gomep el tes dprOpjoae Bovdd-
pevos éharrovev ev dvtwv oloito pa duijorer Oat,
rAd S€ roujras aprOpotn.
GAG... ph ‘What if.... Should we perhaps
say ...?’ So in Dam. often pijrore, as § 42, 84,
prjmote otv dodadéorepov Aéyew ..."ISupev, Oper,
or so is omitted.
