Mr. Harvey not only comes out for Mr. Hughes, but gives very intelligent reasons for his action in the current number of his "North American Review." In his judgment, there are two vital questions to be answered before election. One is, which of the two great parties of this particular juncture in our progress as a nation is the better equipped and the more likely to render the highest public two designated leaders is the more certain to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States? Such an issue as the Democrats claim, that Mr. Wilson has kept us out of war and therefore is entitled to re-election, is brushed aside as something that has no proper place in the mind of the voter of this year. In Mr. Harvey's judgment, only the most insane partisan would venture to suggest a possibility of Mr. Wilson or Mr. Hughes inciting or inviting War with any European or Asiatic Power, and therefore there is no fair issue between them on this question. There are three elements that are involved in the answers to these two questions, those of military and industrial preparedness, government by and for the people, and national honor and opportunity. So far as all of these are concerned, the answer is the same: Mr. Hughes is the man who should be chosen from each and every standpoint—both as the representative of the Republican party and as an individual. The best interests of the country are to be served by his election. 