Affirmed  in  Exchequer  Chamber,  xciv.  573  ;  5  C.  B.  N.  S.  573.
One  vessel  in  tow,  without  active  default,  injuring  another  in  same  tow,  not
liable  to  latter.     Harris  v.  Anderson,  cviii.  499  ;  14  C.  B.  N.  S.  499.
Duty  of  vessels  in  reference  to  submarine  telegraph  wires.  Telegraph  Co.  v.
Dickson,  cix.  759;  15  C.  B.  N.  S.  759.
In  suit  for  damages  for  collision,  on  agreement  to  pay  loss  to  ship,  when  held
to  be  loss  to  owners  of  ship.     Heard  v.  Holman,  cxv.  1 ;  19  C.  B.  N.  S.  1.
The  charter  of  the  Trinity  House  of  Leith,  37  Geo.  3,  1797,  and  1  Geo.  4,  c.
37,  s.  32,  confirming  it,  limit  its  authority  to  license  pilots  to  the  coast  of  Scot-
land.    Hossack  v.  Gray,  cxviii.  598  ;  6  B.  &  S.  598.
XV.  Court  of  admiralty.
A  suit  against  a  ship  in  a  foreign  court,  though  in  its  inception  a  proceeding
in  personam  against  the  captain,  is  in  rem,  and  the  judgment,  though  turning  on
a  question  of  English  law  and  erroneous,  is  conclusive.  Imrie  v.  Castrique,  xcviii.
405;  8  C.B.N.  S.  405.
Reversing  C.  P.,  Ibid.  1.
XVI.  Seamen.
Articles  with  seamen  not  invalid,  under  17  &  18  Vict.  c.  104,  because  provid-
ing for  an  alternative  voyage.    Frazer  v.  Hatton,  lxxxix.  512 ;  2  0.  B.  N.  S.  512.
Not  because  they  provided  for  transfer  of  crew  to  another  vessel.     Ibid.
This  provision  did  not  require  transfer  of  crew  collectively.     Ibid.
Owners  not  liable  to  penalty  for  not  paying  what  was  due  seaman,  when  he
refused  to  give  a  discharge,  under  s.  175,  unless  larger  sum  paid.     Ibid.
Articles  not  void  because  not  executed  before  consular  agent.     Ibid.
