372],  for  buying  counterfeit  shillings,
with  intent,  &c  ,  —  were  cited  in  support
of  the  prosecution ;  for  per  Lee,  J.,  '  all
that  is  necessary  in  this  case,  is  an  act
charged  and  a  criminal  intention  joilied  '
to  that  act.'  "  p.  42.  From  this,  the  dis-
tinction between  "  procuring  "  and  "  hav-
ing "  would  seem  not  to  have  occurred
to  the  court  or  to  Mr.  Leach.
2  Rex  V.  Fuller,  Russ.  &  By.  308;
Brown's  Case,  1  Lewin,  42,

s  Post,  §  285  et  seq.
4  Post,  §  867  et  seq,

6  Post,  §  374  et  seq.
"  Post,  §  301  et  seq,

'  Rex  V.  Scofield,  Cald.  397,  403 ;  1
East  P,  C,  58,  225 ;  2  East  P,  C.  1028,
1030;  Commonwealth  »,  Morse,  2  Mass.
138,  139 ;  Ross  v.  Commonwealth,  2  B.
Monr,  417  ;  Respublica  v.  Malin,  1  Dall,
33 ;  The  State  v.  Will,  1  Dev,  &  Bat.
121,  170 ;  Rex  v.  .Warne,  1  Stra.  644 ;
Rex  V.  Heath,  Russ.  &  By.  184  ;  Rex  v.
Stewart,  Buss.  &  Ry.  288  ;  Toes  v.  The
State,  4  Eng.  42  ;  Torrey  v.  Field,  10  Vt.
358,  409  ;  United  States  w.  Twenty-eight
Packages,  Gilpin,  306 ;  Respublica  v.
Roberts,  1  Dall.  39 ;  Gore's  Case,  9  Co.
81  a ;  Dugdale  c.  Beg.,  16  Eng.  L.  &  Eq.
880,  1  EUis  &  B,  435;   United  States  ».
