Chevrier  v.  The  Queen.— Iv,  1.
0>  or  land— Construction  of,

Held,  per  Strong  J. — Extrinsic  evidence  of  monuments  and  actual
boundary  marks  is  admissible  to  control  the  deed,  but  if  reference  is  made
by  the  deed  to  such  monuments  and  boundaries,  they  control,  though  they
call  for  courses,  distances,  or  computed  contents  which  do  not  agree  with
those  in  the  deed.
^    ^  Grassett  v.  Carter.— x,  105.
6.  Intended  to  operate  as  mortgage.
See  MORTGAGE  9.
7.  Varying  original  promise  of  sale.
See  SALE  OF  LANDS  9.
9*


132

Deed — Continued.
8.    Of  compromise — ^Action  to  set  aside  for  fraud  and  coercion.
See  PAKTITION.
9..  Missing —Evidence  of  under  law  of  N.S. — Certificate  of  Eegistrar—

Affidavit,

See  EJECTMENT  3.
Delegation— Of  authority  by  Attorney  Greneral.
See  CRIMINAL  A.PPEAL  1.
2.    Of  payment — Personal  liability  under.
See  HYPOTHEC.
Delivery — of  railway  iron.
See  RAILWAYS  AND  RAILWAY  COMPANIES  1.
2.    Of  policy -Effect  of.
See  INSURANCE,  LIFE  5.
Demolition  of   Works — in  province  or  Quebec,  bow  demanded.
■   Hold,  that  demolition  of  works  completed  may  properly  he  demanded
iu  a  petitory 'action  for  the  recovery  of  property  and  that  the  present  action

is  one  in  the  nature  of  a  petitory  action.
Joyce  v.  Hart.— 1,  321.
Demurrage.
See  SHIPS  AND  SHIPPING  8.
Demurrer — In  action  of  conversion  against  sheriff.
See  CORPORATIONS  5.
2.    Petition  of  rlgUt.
N.  C,  the  suppliant,  by  his  petition  of  right,  claimed,  as  representing
the  heirs  of  P.  W.  jr.,  certain  parcels  of  land  originally  granted  by  letters
patent  from  the  Crown,  dated  5th  January,  1806,  to  P.  W.  senr.,  together
with  a  sum  of  $200,000,  for  the  rents,  issues  and  profits  derived  therefrom  by
the  Government  since  the  illegal  detention  thereof.
