Heyde,  4  Sandf.  692.  An  allegation  that  the  offense  was  com-
mitted in  February  and  March,  1867,  in  the  cities  of  New  York  and
Brooklyn,  held  to  be  sufficiently  specific.  Clarh  v.  ClarJc,  7  Robt.
276.  In  actions  of  divorce,  allegations  of  adultery  committed  with
persons  unknown  to  the  party  pleading,  must  nevertheless  state
specifically  time  and  places.     Tim  v.  Tim,  16  Abb.  (N.  S.)  39.
Where  the  complaint  alleged  that  the  defendant,  from  the  first  of
November  previous,  up  to  the  time  of  the  verification  of  the  com-
plaint, went  to,  visited,  and  at  various  houses  and  places  of  prostitu-
tion or  assignation  in  the  city  of  New  York,  which  times  and  places
plaintiff  was  unable  to  particularize,  committed  adultery  and  had
carnal  connection  with  a  person  therein  named  ;    held,  that  the  alle-


430  Action  fob  Divoece.
gation  shonld  be  rendered  more  definite  and  certain  as  to  the  place
at  wliich  the  adultery  was  conamitted.     Cardwell  v.  Cardwell,  12
lliin,  92.     A  complaint  is  sufficient  which  avers  the  adultery  with  a
person,  whose  name  is  unknown,  between  certain  specified  dates,
and  in  a  town  or  city  named,  and  further  avers  that  plaintiff  is  un-
able to  more  particularly  specify  the  times  and  places.     Mitchell  v.
