"  carried  upon  the  said  navigation,  canal,  cut,  or  any  of
"  them."  They  had  expended  considerable  sums  in
clearing  and  deepening  the  river  for  the  purpose  of  making
it  navigable  to  a  point  about  one-quarter  mile  of  Boat  Pool,
but  had  not  made  the  canal  or  collateral  cut : — Held,  that
they  were  entitled  to  recover  tolls  for  carriage  of  goods
over  the  part  of  the  river  made  navigable.'-

Where  a  canal  company  were  authorized  by  their  Acts
to  make  a  canal,  and  do  other  things  necessary  for  the
making,  improving,  and  using  it ;  but  were  forbidden  to
make  more  than  8  per  cent  profit,  and  were  to  lay  their
accounts  annually  before  justices  : — It  was  held  that  they
were  authorized  by  their  Act  to  deepen  and  widen  the
canal  after  it  had  been  completed  (that  being  beneficial  to
the  public) ;  and  that  the  widening  and  deepening  being
done  at  the  request  of  those  using  the  canal,  the  charge
for  so  doing  was  a  charge  attending  the  using  of  the
canal.^

'   Tumar  Kavigation  v.  Wagstaffe,  '  Sex  v.  Glamorganshire,  7  B.  &

4  B.  &  S.  2S8.  C.  722.
