M.  200.  w  Watson  v.  The  State,  36  Missis.  593 ;

2  Rex  V.  Anderson,  2  East  P.  C.  772;     ante,  §  140,  note.
Rex  V.  Prowes,  1  Moody,  349.  "  The  State  v.  Bennett,  14  Iowa,  479 ;

8  Reg.  V.  Madge,  9  Car.  &  P.  29 ;  Reg.     ante,  §  140,  note.
V.  DebKuiel,  11  Cox  C.  C.  207.  "  Ferrill  v.  Commonwealth,  1  Duvall,

*  People  V.  Gardner,   2  Johns.  477 ;     153 ;  ante,  §  140,  note.
People  «.  Schenck,  2  Johns.  479.    See  "  The  State  w.  Newman,  9  Nev.  48;

People  V.  Burke,  11  Wend.  129.  ante,  §  140,  note.
5  The  State  t.  LeElanch,  2  Vroom,  20  Myers  «.  People,  26  111.  173.
82.  21  The  State  v.  Johnson,  2  Oregon,  115.
'  Simmons  v.  Commonwealth,  5  Binn.  22  Commonwealth  o.  CuUins,  1  Mass.
617.  116  ;  Commonwealth  v.  Andrews,  2  Mass.
'  The  State  v.  Brown,  1  Hayw.  100.  14 ;  Commonwealth  v.  Rand,  7  Met.  475,

*  Simpson  ».  The   State,  4  Humph.  477 ;  Commonwealth  v.  Holder,  9  Gray,  7.
456, 459.  23  Commonwealth    v.    Uprichard,     3

'  Beal  V.  The  State,  15  Ind.  378.  Gray,  434.
1"  The  State  v.  Reonnals,  14  La.  An.  "4  xhe  State  v.  Underwood,  supra.
278.  25  Hamilton  v.  The    State,  11   Ohio,

"  People  ».  Loughridge,  1  Neb.  11.  435.
12  Ante,  §  137.  28  Stanley  v.  The  State,  24  Ohio  State,

"  The  State  ».  Ellis,  3  Conn.  185;  The  166 ;  ante,  §  140,  note.
State  ».  Cummings,  33  Conn.  260.  27  People  v.  Burke,  11  Wend.  129.
"  The  State  0.  Bartlett,  11  Vt.  650.
79


§  143  JTJEISDICTION  AND   LOCALITY.  [BOOK  H.
