321 ;  44  L.  J.  C.  567.  Trice,   46  L.   J.   C.   761  ;   Stanlei/  v.
(/)  Ante,  p.  480  ;  see  TVhittakerv.  Stuiilci/,  L.  R.  7  0   D    689  ■  47  L   J

Kershaw,  L.   R.   45   C.  D.    320 ;   60  C.  256.  '  '

L-  J.  C.  9.  {k)    TTainfordY.Scil,  L.  R.  20  Eq.
(g)  Lircrpool  Adi'lphi  Ass.  Y.  Fair-  321;   44  L.  J.  C.   567;  see  Esher

hurst,  9  Ex.  429  ;  23  L.  J.  Ex.  165  ;  M.  R.,  Scott  y.  J/oj-fcy,  L.  R    20  Q

Cannam  v.   Farmer,   3  Ex.  698  ;   see  B.  D.  124
Wrii/ht  V.   Leonard,    11   0.  B.  N.  S.
MARRIED  WOMEN.
487


representations  made  hj  her  respecting  her  property,  and  to    Ch.  III.
dispose  of  the  property  according  to  the  representation ;  as  '- — -

where  a  married  woman  allowed  a  conveyance  to  be  made  of
an  estate  in  fee,  by  concealing  that  it  was  in  fact  a  life  estate
only  of  which  she  had  the  reversion,  on  becoming  a  widow
she  was  compelled  to  convey  her  reversion  (l).  Where  a  mar-
ried woman  obtained  money  on  a  mortgage  of  her  property,
by  representing  that  she  was  a  widow  and  entitled  to  convey
it,  upon  her  death  the  mortgagee  was  held  entitled  to  an
equitable  charge  upon  the  property  as  against  the  heir  (;»).
And  where  a  husband  and  wife  obtained  money  on  mortgage,
by  concealing  that  it  had  been  settled  upon  their  marriage,
the  mortgagee  was  given  priority  over  their  rights  under  the
settlement  (h).  But  where  a  married  woman  mortgaged  her
separate  property  by  concealing  that  it  was  settled  with  a
restriction  against  anticipation,  it  was  held  that  no  charging
order  could  be  made  upon  the  dividends,  the  restriction  being
absolute  (o).
