43.  But  the  master  of  the  ship  cannot  engage  her  for  purposes,  Consistently
or  on  terms,  essentially  different  from  those  on  which  the  owners  vessel's  usual
have  usually  employed  her  (y).     What  these  are  depends  partly  on  employment.
(?)  He  cannot  contract  bt/  deed  on  tkeir  {t)  See  per  Lord  Watson  in  Stumore

behalf,  unless  he  is  authorized  by  deed  v.  Breen,  12  A.  C.  698,  p.  704.
to  do  so.    Horsley  v.  Rush,  cited  7  T.  E.  («)  Lloyd  v.  G-uibert,  33  L.  J.,  Q.  B.
at  p.  209.  241,  at  p.  248;  L.  K.,   1  Q.  B.  115.
(r)  Smith's  Merc.  Law,  viii.  p.  124,  And  see  The  G-aetano  and   Maria,   7

and  per  Jerris,  C.  J.,  in  Grant  v.  Nor-  p.  D.  137.
way,  20  L.  J.,  0.  P.  p.  98  ;  Sandeman  T-Dorix>

a  X    T.     n  /^   1^  c  («)  Hanson  v.  Eoyden,  L.  E.,  3  0.  P.
».  Sourr,  L.  R.,  2  Q.  B.  86.  ,»       .     ^         i..     -1       i  ^  ^.-i.  i.  j

,  ,    T.       -^^     ■,    -.T    ^      •.«•  •  47.    As  to  authority  oi  a  substituted

W   ^er   Wood,   V.-C    .  Messagenes  ^  ^^  ^^^  Alexander,  1  Dod.  278  ;

T-«,       :-JTT.L\  o\      n  ,';T.f      The  KLinersley  Castle,  3  Hagg.  1.
p.   765  ;   Abbott  (5th),   p.  91 ;   (13th),  ■'  ;  so

120;  Story,  Agency,  ss,  116—121.  {j/}  Story,  Agency,  s.  121.
C. C.  E


50  THE  CONTEACT.
