Suitar D.varrs Hup, lies,!?{. Much
Sujij'tiM by Silt'iirv *n!
I.ionor
i\ roi l? yk.\i;h
i.c^isiative (OniiiiitljT <>i' Anti-Saloon
!sHhv?'s I'orwu.'il Leap
??:ss Ufoti Tiikc::?Wants Law
i'asM'd ;it District of Columbia.
; |?.x \ J. t.1 It-. |
I NI?IA N A I '? > I.1S. INI'. Novum he i*!?
iiliver \V. Stewart, chairman i?i
Prohibition n." 1 i'.ni:i! campaign committee, today issued a statement in which it is said that the Prohibition vote would be held in the party, and that the prohibition vote would have been voted against the prohibition ticket. The Republican ticket would have assured the Republicans that the election would be assured. The Republican ticket would have been assured by Mr. Stewart, who said:
"Returns from our vote just now in. but we have heard it.  In the context of the text, I have made the following corrections based on the context clues provided:

"In the midst of the tumult, the vote for Mr. Bailey, the Democratic candidate for Governor, reached a total of 10,000 votes. Mr. Chilton, our candidate for Governor, was elected by a majority of 10,000 votes. So, also, in the race between the parties, the increase in votes was significant. The vote for Mr. Bailey was a significant victory for the party, as it demonstrated the strength of the party in the state. The vote for Mr. Chilton was a significant victory for the party, as it demonstrated the strength of the party in the state. The vote for Mr. Chilton was a significant victory for the party, as it demonstrated the strength of the party in the state. The vote for Mr. Chilton was a significant victory for the party, as it demonstrated the strength of the party in the state. The vote for Mr. Chilton was a significant victory for the party, as it demonstrated the strength of the party in the state. The vote for Mr. Chilton was a significant victory for the party, as it demonstrated the strength of the party in the state. The vote for Mr. Chilton was a significant victory for the party, as it demonstrated the strength of the party in the state." 