1  Ante,  §  979  a,  979  b,  1156,  1157  ;  Post,  §  1197  a;  Trustees  of  Baptist  Asso-
ciation u.  Hart's  Ex'rs,  4  Wheat.  E.  1,  33,  39,  43  to  45  ;  Stubbs  v.  Sargon,
2  Keen,  R.  255 ;  Ommaney  v.  Butcher,  1  Turn.  &  Russ.  260,  270,  271  ;  Fowler
V.  Garlike,  1  Russ.  &  Mylne,  232.
2  Ibid.
3  Ommaney  v.  Butcher,  1  Turn.  &  Russ.  260,  270 ;  Attorney-General  v.
Peafson,  7  Sim.  R.  290 ;  Stubbs  v.  Sargon,  3  Mylne  &  Craig,  507 ;  Ante,
§  979  b,  1068.
CH.  XXXII


.]  CHARITIES.  5S7


§  1184.  It  has  been  rtiade  a  question,  whether  a  Court  of
Equity,  sitting  in  one;  jurisdiction,  can  execute  any  charitable
bequests  for  foreign  objects  in  another  jurisdiction.  The  es-
tablished doctrine  seems  to  be  in  favor  of  executing  such
bequests.^  Of  course,  this  must  be  understood  as  subject  to
the  implied  exception,  that  the  objects  of  the  charities  are  not
against  the  public  policy  or  laws  of  the  State  where  they  are

1  Attorney-General  v.  City  of  London,  3  Bro.  Ch.  E.  171 ;  S.  C.  1  Ves.  jr.
