Authorities on the first paragraph of the text. — State v. Soper, 16
Me. 293; 33 Am. Dec. 665; Aldrich v. Warren, 16 Me. 465; Lee v.
Lamprey, 43 N. H. 13; Jacobs v. Shorey, 48 N. H. 100; 97 Am. Dec.
586; Jeune v. Joslyn, 41 Vt. 478.
The evidence described in this article comes in as part of the res
gestce. State v. Soper, 16 Me. 293; 33 Am. Dec. 665.
The rule of the text as to statements made subsequently by indi-
vidual conspirators, as to measures taken, is supported by State v.
Larkin, 49 N. H. 39.
Connecticut.
Authorities on the first statement of the text.^ Cowles v. Coe, 21
Conn. 235; State v. GUdden, 55 Conn. 78, 79; Enower v. Cadden
Clothing Co., 57 Conn. 222; State v. Thompson, 69 Conn. 720; State v.
Shields, 45 Conn. 263.
The rule of this article applies to both civil and criminal cases.
Knower v. Cadden Clothing Co., 57 Conn. 222.
The things must have been said, done or written in the. execution
or furtherance of the common purpose. Knower v. Cadden Clothing
Co., 57 Conn. 222.
Everything said under the circumstances detailed in the text is ad-
missible. Cowles v. Coe, 21 Conn. 234.
It is immaterial that the one whose acts or declarations are offered
is not a party to the proceeding. "State v. GUdden, 55 Conn. 78; 8
Atl. 890; 3 Am. St. Rep. 23.
Statements of one are admissible even though made in the absence
of the others. State v. Shields, 45 Conn. 256; Knower v. Cadden
Clothing Co., 57 Conn. 222.
Preliminary proof. — ■ The rule of the text as to preliminary proof
of the conspiracy is supported by Knoioer v. Cadden Clothing Co., 57
Conn. 222.
