jSTo  action  can  be  maintained  when  an  employe  is  injured
by  one  who  is  acting  as  a  fellow  servant  ;^^  and  the  fellow-
servant  rule  has  been  held  to  be  a  bar  where  a  watchman  at
a  curve  was  injured  by  the  gripman  of  a  car,^*  where  an

20  Millard  v.  West  End  St.  Ry.  Co.,  173  Mass.  512.
21  Duggan  V.  Third  Ave.  R.  Co.,  9  Misc.  Rep.  (N.  Y.)  158.
22  Shadford  v.  Ann  Arbor  St.  Ry.  Co.,  121  Mich.  224.
23  Stapleton  v.  Citizens'  Traction  Co.,  5  Pa.  Super.  Ct.  253.
24  Delude  v.  St.  Paul  City  Ry.  Co.,  55  Minn.  63.
25  Bland  v.  Shreveport  Belt  Ry.  Co.,  48  La.  Ann.  1057.
26  Sullivan  v.  Union  Ry.  Co.,  7  App.  Div.  (N.  Y.)  238.
26a  Karczewski   v.  Wilmington   City  Ry.   Co.    (Del.)    54   Atl.   746
26b  Noe  V.  Rapid  Ry.  Co.  (Mich.)  94  N.  W.  743.
27  Denver  &  B.  P.  Rapid  Transit  Co.  v.  Dwyer,  20  Colo.  132.
28Brittain  v.  West  End  St.  Ry.  Co.,  168  Mass.  10;  Norman  v.  Mid-
dlesex &  S.  Traction  Co.,  68  N.  J.  Law,  728.
29  Murray  v.  St.  Louis  Cable  &  W.  Ry.  Co.,  98  Mo.  573.
