' ' revoke it )>r, ,
nl*heii ih Ur r" int !,il"
cha .^e. !.f m !l'- proposed
,. ' '. '?* tl,n<' of ? y ran nr. u- of
.. V ,!'a? " ' ,1"' L'"IT
;; Ua,v at v.rian... with
h' plan described to th. board. The
' I.it.tto 1.1 lie pr, lit U - supplied,
taken in , o?j u ,,, t))0 1>u,,Jro
-Id i the pencil
J?tt*? whl.-h r.. 11 > ,he pian fllMv
he -tniMtiv asserts. ; defense that
rtisiiig-ntiruis and misleading ?
Plie petit iotier av. t s that 11 a.~e,.t^.|
the permit AS contract fli;lh
??n?l that since a,, relocation da !Se
was included i? the permit, the super
\ ors are without |iowr to revoke j.
< mi t'tut \ ti on rmniivsioN
I'llvrpilN l-:s II1: \ It I N IJ
The elevation of the tracks at North
..till. II il.Mn.Ved the usefulness of the
old station httlliMns. and th* company
" T u* to :i point U.im.m ft . f
d! - t a ti t from (ho ?.ld location, where
wa- ac-esM t.le at grade. \pple.
u row# rs \\ ?.?. used the old st.,. ?: e:r.
t" r? <1 a l".u?l protest, claimim; that th(>
new location entailed an evtr., haul nc
<li-tance of more than a mile fot the
round trip, some of i, over a : ?? per
,, r|t -' -'.le. Viliac >rs at N.., ,h Car
<Un totned 111 the protest.
