2  See  Brett  v.  Greenwell,  3  Younge  &  Coll.  280  to  232  ;  Beresford  v.  Hob-
son,  1  Madd.  K.  362  ;  Scott  v,  Spastett,  9  Eng.  Law  &  Eq.  R.  265.  [This  was
done  in  Gardner  v.  Marshall,  14  Simons,  E.  575,  although  the  husband  was  a
bankrupt.]  In  Foden  v.  Finney,  4  Euss.  E.  428,  the  whole  fund  in  the  Court
being  less  than  £200,  (which  is  the  lowest  sum  for  which  the  Court  gives  the
wife  the  benefit  of  her  equity,)  the  Court  ordered  the  whole  to  be  paid  over  to

,  the  husband,  notwithstanding  he  had  deserted  her  and  left  her  without  support
for  ten  years.  This  case  seems  difficult  to  be  maintained  on  principle.  [In
(Jutler's  Trust,  inre,  15  (English)  Jurist,  911;  6  Eng.  Law  &  Eq.  E.  97,  the
Master  of  the  Eolls  (Sir  John  Eomilly,)  disapproved  of  this  case.]


79^  EQUITY    JURISPRUDENCE.  [cH.  XX  XVII.
