DISTRICT COURT REVERSED
' irenit I nurf lland* llinrn Opinion in
1 "Me of I I nihil rue AKiiinwf
II ropli,,
I lie i nit.-d states Circuit Court or
Appeals yesterday handed down an
opinion reversion the district Court or
-Maryland in the .ase ,.r Herbert W
II laih..rne. plaintifr in error, vs. John
.. Htophy. derendant in error The
lower curl did not allow the . ase to
k>> to the Jury, after the plaintifr had
introduced evidence f. show that he
wa? entitled to a ree ?T JS.'.WO a 5 per
"in commission on the $1(5.',.oon. the
? ? ult ?r I he sale ,.r the Cirrua Coal
.in I ' o|<e i *??mpany.
The liistn.-t Court, or Maryland ruled
... the evidence was not sufficient to
^h"? the liability ?f t ho defendant
i ne ( it- uit Court remanded the case
with instructions that the points
"?"lylit out in the decision, and which
"??re re la t, v e appearing
mi ? oi responden, e whbh passed I.e.
?Vnd"!' "J",.,WM l,;"-ties at I>ar l.e noted.
and lo follow the instru- t lona pointed
1 k'i* i?i the decision.
FILES GROUNDS OF DEFENSE
?III* I I. mii (Dm l)nm?Koi front
^Inehlne ? onipnnv II,..
cmi*c Of lluimnnj' tn-lilrni.
I" the case or KHis Kranltlin l.andli
auaiiiM the .? i ng?r Sewing Machine
"inpanv. brought in the ? jt.. circuit
? '..III. the derendant eotnpa.M- vester.
da> rile.| It, grounds ..r dcren.se Hin
di* is suing for ?-.0u0, alleging that lie
;*? knocked doun hy a runawav hor-e
of the sewing machine companv on
Apnl .fi m.%. and seriously injured.
