seal  or  other  instrument  be  impressed  on  the  deed  with  inten-
tion of  sealing  it,  although  no  impression  be  left  {g)  ;  and
upon  proof  of  the  signature  of  a  deed  bearing  a  seal  and
purporting  to  be  sealed  by  the  party  signing,  the  fact  of
sealing  may  be  presumed  [h).  But  in  the  absence  of  a  seal
or  other  evidence  there  is  no  presumption  that  an  instrument
purporting  to  be  a  deed  has  been  sealed  («').  One  seal  will
serve  for  several  persons,  if  it  appears  to  have  been  intended
and  used  as  the  seal  of  each  (J;).  And  it  is  no  objection  that
there  are  two  seals  appearing  for  the  same  party ;  as  where
the  deed  was  executed  by  two  agents  acting  for  one  principal,
each  of  whom  signed  his  name  opposite  a  different  seal  on
behalf  of  the  principal  {I).
(c)  Co.  Lit.   35  b  ;   171  t ;   Shep-  [g)  In  re  Sandilands,  L.  E.  6  C.  P.
pard's  Touchstone,  p.  50.  411 ;   see   The  Queen  v.  St.  Paul's,  7

(d)  See  Geary  v.  FAi/sie,  5  B.  &  C.  Q.  B.  238,  n.  (d) ;   Clement  v.   Gun-
237  ;   Schneider  v.  Norris,  2  M.  &  S.  house,  5  Esp.  83.
286.  (A)    Taliot    t.   Hodson,    7    Taunt.
(<•)    Sheppard's     Touchstone,     by  251.
Preston,  p.  56 ;    Taunton  v.  Pepler,  6  [i)    National    Provincial    Bank    v.
Madd.  166  ;   see  Tupper  v.  Foulkes,  9  Jackson,  L.  E..  33  CD.  1.
C.  B.  N.  S.  803.  {k)  Ball  v.  Dunsterville,   i  T.   R.
{/)  Aveline  Y.  Whisson,  iM..  &  Gr.  313;  per  cur.    Cooch   v.   Goodman,    2

801 ;   see  CoocA  v.  Goodman,  2  Q.  B.  Q.  B.  698.
