Saxter  v.  Tayler,  4  B.  &  A.  72 ;  414;  Mott  t.  Shoolbred,  L.  K.,  2
HellY.  Tioentyman,  1  A.  &  E.  766;  Eq.  22;  Jones  v.  Chappell,  L.  R.,
see  also  Sopieood  t.  Schofleld,  2  20  Eq.  639;  Wilson  v.  Towns-
Moo.  &  Rob.  34  ;  Tucker  v.  New-  end,  1  Br.  &  S.  324  ;  Cleave  v.  Jfa-
man,  n  A.  &Ti.  iO;  Fai/y.  Freii-  homj,  9  "W.  R.  882;  JBroder  v.
tice,  1  C.  B.  828  ;  Kidgell  Y.  Moor,  Saillar,  2  Ch.  D.  292.
9C  B  364-  Metropolitan  Associa-  '  Metropolitan  AssociationY.  Fetch,
tionY.  Fetch,  5  C.  B.,  N.  S.  504;  5  C.  B.,N.  S.  504;  Bell  Y.  Midland
Mumford  v.  Oxford  Eailwaij,  1   H.  Railway,  10  0.  B.,  N.  S.  287.
Digitized  by  Microsoft®


656  EEMEDIES    FOR   THE    INFRINGEMENT   OF  RIGHTS    OF  WATER.
