[o)  Exp.  Gleland,  L.  R.  2  Ch.  808  ;  (t)  Williams,  J".,  Cochrane  v.  Green,

36  L.  J.  B.  45.  9  C.  B.  N.  S.  448  ;  30  L.  J.  0.  P.  97  ;

[p]  Selborne,  L.  C,  Se  Sarrald,  Jessel,  M.  E,.,  Middleton  v.  Pollock,

53Ij.  J.C.505;  see  Hallett  ^ .  Sallelt,  supra;  Clarkv.Cort,  Or.  &  Ph.  154;

L.  E.  13  C.  D.  232  ;  49  L.  J.  0.  61.  Megrath  v.  Gray,  L.  E.  9  0.  P.  216 ;

{q)  Jones  y.  Mossop,  3  Hare,  568.  43  L.  J.  C.  P.  63.
\r\  Jones  v.  Mossop,  supra ;  Fx  p.  (u)  Cavendish  v.  Oeaves,   24  Beav.
Morier,  L.  E.  12  C.  D.  491 ;  49  L.  J.  163  ;  27  L.  J.  0.  314.
B.  9  ;  SaiUy  v.  Finch,  L.  E.  7  Ql  B.
876  DISCHARGE  OF  CONTRACTS.
Part  IV.  original  creditor  which  have  accrued  due  after  notice  of  the
assignment,  though  contracted  before,  unless  contracted  with
Set-off  by  an  agreement  for  set-off  (j"). — Upon  the  principle  that  a
surety  upon  payment  of  the  debt  is  entitled  to  an  assignment
of  the  securities  of  the  creditor  against  the  principal  debtor ;
the  surety  may  plead  to  an  action  for  the  debt  a  set-ofi  due
from  the  plaintiff  to  the  principal  debtor,  which  the  latter
might  plead  in  reduction  of  the  debt  for  which  the  surety  is
liable  (y) .  And  a  surety  may  claim  to  have  such  assignment
of  securities  upon  payment  of  the  principal  debt  with  set-off
of  money  due  to  himself  from  the  creditor,  upon  the  faith  of
which  the  suretyship  was  given  (z).
