§384
Gifts  of  pri-
vate copies
of  prints.
§385

What  was
held  insufii-
cient  to  prove
absence  of
publication   of
a  painting.
§386
Eeasons  for
difficulty  in
determining
what  is
publication  of
a  painting.
31_Wright  V.  Eisle,  86  N.  T.  A.  D.  356.
32— Gendell  v.  Orr,  13  Phila.  191.
33— Prince  Albert  v.  Strange,  2  De  G.  &  S.  M.  652.
34 — Bosselman  v.  Eichardson,  174  F.  622.
35— In  Gendell  v.  Orr,  13  Phila.  191,  the  Court  deemed  there  could
be  copyright  in  a  portico  or  porch,  in  a  proper  case,  but  that  such
work  was  published  by  being  made  part  of  a  house  on  a  public  high-
way and  left  there  three  years.
150


LAW  OF  COPYRIGHT


§387


rule  as  to
what  may
constitute
publication.
§388
Publication
of  photo-
graphs and
motion
pictures.
ings  be  not  produced,  if  they  can  be  produced,  such
potential  capacity  points  the  way  as  to  what  may
be  deemed  publication  of  a  painting.
