He may be required to answer for his negligence to another emnlove
sec. 28, 33. -"Piuye,



186

EMPLOYES— Continued.
When injured, he must show this was done by the incompetency of

another servant working for a common employer, sec. 5, 42.
How incompetency must be proved, sec. 6, 42.
He is warranted in assuming his master has employed competent serv-
ants, sec. 10, 44.
He must not use an appliance for any other use than that intended,

sec. 0, 51.
Is not required to inspect the work of a co-employe, sec. 20, 64.
He assumes the risk involved in constant change of place of work,

sec. 9, 69.
Where rules exist, employes must read them, sec. 4, 72.
Should be discharged if he disobeys rules, sec. 6, 72.
He cannot dispute the reasonableness of a regulation.
His competency is a question of fact, sec. 9, 84.
He assumes all ordinary risks, sec. 1, 89.
What is an ordinary or natural risk, sec. 2, 90.
He may assume unusual ones, sec. 3, 91; sec. 4, 91; sec. 1, 92.
He assumes no risk he does not comprehend, sec. 6, 96.
If he works on an employer's assurance of safety, the latter is liable,

sec. 7, 97.
A peril known to an employer but not to an employe is not assumed,

sec. 8, 97; sec. 11, 101; sec. 13, 103.
This modification applies to all kinds of labor, sec. 12, 102.
Distinction between fixed and changing risks, sec. 10, 100.
When injured, what is the nature of the inquiry, sec. 15, 105.
He assumes risks discovered while working, s€c. 1, 122.
A protest against continuing work after the discovery will not suffice,

sec. 2, 123.
