Liability as a project manager
<p>I am offering project management services to a group of people wanting to buy some property.I would like to say something like this:
&quot;Any advice I will give to the client will either be based on the best of my knowledge or based on information from a professional advisors chosen by the client, for which I personally will not take liability.&quot;
Is this acceptable to avoid liability or is there better wording?</p>

<blockquote>
<p>Is this acceptable to avoid liability or is there better wording?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There is not nearly enough information for assessing whether the statement precludes a finding of liability.</p>
<p>Consider the following issues:</p>
<ul>
<li>The nature and scope of your contract are unclear. For instance, your
client's intent to buy real estate might have no relevance to your
role of project manager, or the latter might inevitably trigger
duties no realtor can lawfully elude. It is impossible to tell which scenario applies in your matter.</li>
<li>The legislation in the applicable --and unspecified-- jurisdiction(s)
might void or supersede your no-liability clause.</li>
<li>It is doubtful that advice &quot;<em>based on the best on your knowledge</em>&quot;
and &quot;<em>based on information [from a third party]</em>&quot; will always be
mutually exclusive.</li>
<li>The clause seems limited to liability for detrimental advice, thereby leaving all other sorts of liability unaddressed even if they also pertain to project management.</li>
</ul>
<p>There is no magic, <em>one-size-fits-all</em> wording for addressing issues of liability.</p>

liability property advice