Is there any truth in that social security was based on models of either railroad worker or maritime insurance schemes?
<p>A common law citizen trope which is no doubt in the final analysis completely bogus is that social security was modelled after mandated insurance for ships. David Siegel in another question suggested that it might have actually been insurance for railroad workers although I wonder if it wasn't more  modelled from private pension schemes. Anyway is there any kernel of truth?</p>
<p>I kind of suppose that their interest in the topic more derives from the fact that it represents something that the government takes out of your every paycheck which it is thus widely satisfying and appealing to have a conspiracy theory-like explanation of.</p>

<p>According to the Wikipedia article <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Social_Security_in_the_United_States#Debates_on_the_constitutionality_of_the_Act" rel="nofollow noreferrer">&quot;History of Social Security in the United States&quot;</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In the 1930s, the Supreme Court struck down many pieces of Roosevelt's New Deal legislation, including the Railroad Retirement Act. The Social Security Act's similarity with the Railroad Retirement Act caused Edwin Witte, the executive director of the President's Committee on Economic Security under Roosevelt ... to question whether or not the bill would pass</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The official page <a href="https://www.ssa.gov/history/briefhistory3.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">&quot;Historical Background and Development of Social Security&quot;</a> gives a fairly long and detailed history of both remote and immediate predecessor programs and concepts, including ones from other countries than the US.</p>

united-states common-law social-security opca