3-clause BSD + Apache License 2.0 + Mozilla Public License 1.1
<p>I'm currently handling a project where devolopers have used the 3 different oss codes &amp; respective licenses abovementioned and also proprietary code.
scenario is as follows: </p>

<ul>
<li>The sw tool being developed will use the oss code (set of libraries) without modifications;</li>
<li>The libraries will be used in binary form;</li>
<li>Proprietary source code is not intermixed with libraries code; but</li>
<li>It calls the use of the api of the libraries.</li>
</ul>

<p>I know that Apache 2.0 and Mozilla 1.1 are incompatible. Since i can also apply Mozilla's 2.0 license terms this makes all these different licenses compatible with each other?</p>

<p>Getting to the question: what license terms should prevail? or is the correct way to distribute the sw tool to do it including a ABOUT file with all the different license terms?</p>

<p>I'm neglecting any proprietary terms that may affect your program.</p>

<p>Since you don't modify any code or binaries of the open source projects...</p>

<ul>
<li>BSD licensed code: Make sure to attribute, display license notice;</li>
<li>Apache 2.0 code: Make sure to attribute, display license notice;</li>
<li>Mozilla 2.0 code: No changes, make sure to attribute, display license notice.</li>
</ul>

<p>So basically, nothing "prevails."</p>

<p>What you need to do in your application is assure that you provide all projects with the attribution they require, through displaying the license notices.</p>

open-source-software