California financial document verbiage: 3 months instead of 90 days?
<p>Is there a law in California about the verbiage used in financial transaction language regarding the need to use the language "3 months" instead of "90 days"?</p>

<p>I was told that this is the case, but I cannot find can't reference to it.</p>

<p><em>Need to use</em> is too strong a claim but 90 days is a different period of time than 3 months.</p>

<p>90 days from 1 July is 29 September but 3 months is 1 October.</p>

california