Are there any cases where the witness has answered the cross-examiner to highlight what he is attempting,and what are the potential consequences
<p>Often a cross-examiner will make suggestions that are almost certainly not believed by the cross-examiner himself. I am sure that there have been belligerent witnesses who have thrown abuse, but have there been/is it common for people to answer along the lines of 'as you well know, no',  or even to call the lawyer unethical/ evil  for persuing that course of action to his face. Also, is there any study/experience that suggests whether this would be positively or negatively received by the jury and or judge.</p>

<h2>That is not the witness' role</h2>

<p>Calling out an improper question is the role of the opposing counsel or, in egregious abuses, the judge. A witness is required to answer the questions that are put to them as clearly and concisely as they can. If they don't, the come across as snarky and contrary - this rarely endears them to the jury.</p>

united-kingdom witnesses