Late fees stacked up over more than a year without notification
<p>I leased a car in May 2019 and I did setup auto payment from my bank account every month. Recently, I moved to different state and in order to get driver's license, I needed to get some information from the lease company's website and figured I had outstanding balance $750. I called the customer service and found out that my auto payment have been paying for previous month for my car and late fee was kept charged every month for 16 months since last year WITHOUT any outstanding balance notification.</p>
<p>I did pay it in full amount yesterday just to avoid more late fees but I want to know if the car leasing company has any responsibility on notifying customer on outstanding balance.</p>
<p>The total breakdown of charge is $430 (monthly payment) + $320 (late fees for 16 months period).</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>I want to know if the car leasing company has any responsibility on notifying customer on outstanding balance</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This matter is uncertain, but you might want to assess it together with the related issues of <em>good faith &amp; fair dealing</em> as well as the company's apparent <em>invited error</em>. More specifically, you need to ascertain from both the contract and the terms of the automated payment system the following items:</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Whether the contract provides that company has the obligation to which your question refers;</p>
</li>
<li><p>whether the <a href="https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/57149/late-fees-stacked-up-over-more-than-a-year-without-notification#comment116107_57149">explanation</a> given by the customer service representative is premised on the contract; and</p>
</li>
<li><p>if the previous item is answered in the affirmative, whether the automated payment system was supposed to withdraw a fixed amount instead of the current balance.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>Most likely the company will posit that it is commonplace practice to bill for the period that initiates (similar to how it happens with leasing of real estate). Hence the importance of ascertaining item #2, since the contract would supersede a commonplace practice. However, from what I gather, the company's conduct sounds in <em>invitation of error</em> insofar as it systematically turned a blind eye on the fact that you at all times made payments as scheduled.</p>
<p>If the payment system was set up to withdraw the <em>current balance</em>, the company's invitation of error would evidence either a deliberate [company's] scheme to essentially bill in excess of the agreed amount, or a flaw in the company's billing system. Consequently, you would be entitled to a refund of late fees.</p>
<p>The matter is more complicated if the payment system was set up to withdraw a <em>fixed</em> amount. In that scenario, you would need to focus on the argument that the [contract law] <em>implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing</em> should have prompted the company to alert you of the situation instead of permitting a systematic re-occurrence thereof.</p>
<p>Lastly, the reason of being of late fees is, in part, to deter instances that could worsen and develop into customer's default. Here, since your long pattern of <em>scheduled &amp; timely</em> payments essentially rules out said risk of default, the circumstances seemingly support a finding of [company's] <em>unjust enrichment</em>.</p>

fees