Who decides the regulatory designation of various flags?
<p>From a recent answer:</p>
<p>Subject to compliance with the standard conditions, there are 3 categories of flag:</p>
<p>(a) flags which can be flown without consent of the local planning authority</p>
<p>(b) flags which do not need consent provided they comply with further restrictions (referred to as “deemed consent” in the Regulations)</p>
<p>(c) flags which require consent (“express consent”)</p>
<p>...</p>
<p>(b) Flags which do not require consent provided they comply with certain restrictions [include for example] ... the Rainbow flag (6 horizontal equal stripes of red, orange, yellow, green, blue and violet).</p>
<p>...</p>
<p>The regulations governing the flying of flags in England are set out in the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 2007 (as amended in 2012 and in 2021).</p>
<p>These regulations, including relevant amendments to flying of flags, can be viewed on the government legislation website:</p>
<p>Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007
The Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2012
The Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2021 ...</p>
<p>User Michael Hall points out this begs the question of who (and I would add how and on what considerations) will decide which flags fall into which category.</p>

<p>In summary,</p>
<ul>
<li>At the time of writing, Michael Gove has overall ministerial responsibility for making planning regulations, with a good part of the role delegated to Rachel Maclean as Minister of State for Housing.</li>
<li>The detail of regulatory verbiage is the work of civil service lawyers, based on policy formed within the department as a result of the general political process.</li>
<li>There are various rules for how these functions arise and get transferred around government, described below.</li>
</ul>
<h2>The Secretary of State can make regulations about flag display</h2>
<p>These pieces of secondary legislation, as their names suggest, are made under the authority of the <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/8/contents" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Town and Country Planning Act 1990</a>. Several sections of the Act empower regulations to be made by &quot;the Secretary of State&quot;, e.g. in s.220(1) we read</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Regulations under this Act shall make provision for restricting or regulating the display of advertisements so far as appears to the Secretary of State to be expedient in the interests of amenity or public safety.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>and the full Parliamentary procedure for making them is spelled out in  <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/8/section/333" rel="nofollow noreferrer">s.333</a>. This comports with the regulatory preambles, e.g. <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/783/introduction/made" rel="nofollow noreferrer">for the 2007 regulations</a>, saying:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 220, 221, 223(1), 224(3) and 333(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, makes the following Regulations</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>&quot;The Secretary of State&quot; means a specific Secretary chosen by the Prime Minister</h2>
<p>Note that the Act just said &quot;the Secretary of State&quot;, whereas we have just read about a <em>specific</em> Secretary.</p>
<p>What's going on here is that primary legislation just wants to say &quot;whoever in Cabinet has a job that is most relevant&quot;, since functions get transferred around, departments created or abolished, etc., and nobody really wants to update a zillion Acts every time that happens. Instead, there is a framework pattern where powers will be given to &quot;the Secretary of State&quot; generally, but will be executed by a specific one according to the division of responsibilities in the government of the day. That will sometimes be just a matter of agreement within Cabinet, but at other times be encoded in secondary legislation - a &quot;Transfer of Functions Order&quot;. Those Orders are also needed to handle special situations like -</p>
<ul>
<li>transferring property and legal obligations when departments are created, merged, split or abolished</li>
<li>making amendments to legislation which <em>did</em> happen to mention a specific minister</li>
<li>ministers who are not a &quot;Secretary of State&quot; as such, but hold another ministerial title, such as &quot;Lord Privy Seal&quot;</li>
</ul>
<p>These Orders are made under the <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1975/26/contents" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ministers of the Crown Act 1975</a>, and are in the form of orders of the King on the advice of the Privy Council - which is to say, that the Prime Minister decides who does which jobs. Historically, this is something of an accident, since the number of Secretaries of State has increased along with the scope of government, and it was convenient to appoint lots of people to the same formal office rather than invent fresh jobs - especially in the days before ministers were paid.</p>
<p>In any case, flag decisions would currently be made under the authority of the minister responsible for planning affairs, the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Gove" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Michael Gove</a>. That comes from <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/1265/article/4" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a 2021 order</a> when that position was created, inheriting all functions from the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government. Those in turn derive from <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/378/article/8" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a 2018 order</a> taking them from the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, and so on back in time.</p>
<h2>SoS authority can be exercised by other people who work for him</h2>
<p>Additionally, the SoS can delegate functions to junior ministers; for example, the <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/617/signature/made" rel="nofollow noreferrer">2021 regulations</a> state that they are</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Signed by authority of the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government<br>
<em>Christopher Pincher</em><br>Minister of State<br>Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Intra-departmental delegation of functions also requires the agreement of the Prime Minister, although some functions must be performed by the Secretary of State personally. That relates to the so-called &quot;Carltona doctrine&quot;, named for a 1943 court case <em>Carltona Ltd v Commissioners of Works</em> [1943] 2 All ER 560, which establishes that a minister is generally responsible for his whole department, and that when some function is conferred on the Secretary of State, it usually doesn't mean that he has to do it himself. Most administrative functions are like that, although the actual laying of secondary legislation before Parliament has to be done by a member of Parliament, i.e. a member of the ministerial team. Following the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Pincher_scandal" rel="nofollow noreferrer">downfall of Mr Pincher</a>, the junior minister responsible for planning is currently Rachel Maclean, so she would be likely to be taking lead responsibility for putting through planning regulations.</p>
<p>So all this doesn't mean that Mr Gove personally decides which flags fall into which category, although observers of his career know that we can't rule that out. But he is responsible for the actions of his department, and the secondary legislation would be laid before Parliament in his name and on his instructions.</p>
<h2>On the making of flags and sausages</h2>
<p>Regarding &quot;how and on what considerations&quot; these decisions are made, I have no specific knowledge for flag-related policy. But in general, the secondary legislation is written by civil service lawyers on the basis of government policy, and then approved (or at least not disapproved) by Parliament. For example, after Brexit, the EU flag was removed from the list. The mechanism would be that various people who had never heard of the Town and Country Planning Act became upset about flying of the EU flag, and either wrote to ministers or were Cabinet ministers already. Internally to the department, there would have been a mandate to stop the flag being flown, civil servants would figure out the legal steps, and draft the statutory instrument. In the end <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/617/regulation/4/made" rel="nofollow noreferrer">we get
a regulation</a> saying</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In Class H in Schedule 1, in paragraph (b) of column (1) omit the words &quot;the European Union,&quot;.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>even though only planning experts would know or care about &quot;Class H in Schedule 1&quot;. Similar remarks apply to the companion regulation giving prominence to the Union flag over the Scottish flag, which was a political reaction in Westminster to the SNP-led government in Scotland.</p>
<p>Someone who is upset about a regulation, or just wants it to be different, may be able to challenge it through the political process in the same sort of way. There are also avenues for judicial review, if regulations have been made in a way which is irrational, or exceeding the scope of what the original Act allowed, or other similar reasons - but these are difficult to pursue in court. For example, it is more than three months since the 2021 regulations were made, so it is now too late to mount a judicial challenge.</p>

england-and-wales flag