Is it correct to say, that in International Law, the legislature consists of the nation-states and they are the ones subject to the laws do enacted?
<p>In International law, the subjects, unlike that of national law, are the nation-states themselves. In this way, can we say that in temporal law here,  there being no higher power, must be horizontal here rather than the vertical form it takes within a nation-state. Then we ought to consider nation-states in toto, as the <em>de facto</em> legislature, even if not <em>de jure</em>; that is in customary and positive law, as opposed to law itself.</p>
<p><strong>Q. Is this an accurate description of how international law differed from domestic law in nation-states?</strong></p>

<h2>No</h2>
<p>International law is a web of multilateral and bilateral treaties and custom. There is no legislature, there are merely sovereign states agreeing between themselves what the law is.</p>

international