Compensation for custody awaiting trial resulting in acquittal?
<p>I was accused of a crime and held in custody for 8 months then acquitted at court,  I missed the first 8 months of my only child's life, and lost both my job and my partner.  Could I be entitled to compensation? </p>

<p>In all but a few U.S. states the answer is that you are not entitled to any compensation. This is grossly unfair, but is the dominant rule by far in most jurisdictions in the U.S.</p>

<p>As a matter of legal doctrine this is justified on the grounds that a criminal prosecution requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and many people who are actually guilty may be acquitted anyway because the standard of proof in a criminal case is so high. The classic example of that distinction is the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O._J._Simpson_murder_case" rel="noreferrer">O.J. Simpson murder case</a>, in which O.J. Simpson was acquitted of murdering his wife in a criminal prosecution, but was found liable for murdering her by the lower civil action preponderance of the evidence standard in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by her family.</p>

<p>(In reality, most acquittals involve juries who think that the defendant was innocent, but that isn't reflected in the choice before them to convict or acquit a defendant.) </p>

<p>The only compensation to which you are entitled as a matter of law if you are acquitted of a crime, per the U.S. Supreme Court, is a refund of any fines or costs payable only upon conviction of a crime, which you paid or had taken from your assets, prior to your acquittal. <em>See <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/581/15-1256/opinion3.html" rel="noreferrer">Nelson v. Colorado</a></em>, 581 U.S. ___ (2017).</p>

<p>There would an exception if you can show that a law enforcement officer intentionally brought charges without probable cause <a href="http://www.virginialawreview.org/sites/virginialawreview.org/files/Kossis_Book.pdf" rel="noreferrer">in a civil lawsuit you bring against the law enforcement officer</a>, which is realistically impossible in almost all cases. (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecutorial_immunity" rel="noreferrer">Prosecutors</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_immunity" rel="noreferrer">judges</a> and jurors (see, e.g. <a href="https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/132.210" rel="noreferrer">here</a>)) have absolute immunity from liability for their official acts related to the court process.)</p>

<p>There are a few jurisdictions where you could bring a civil lawsuit for compensation based upon "actual innocence", rather than law enforcement misconduct. In those places, you could receive compensation if you could prove by a preponderance of the evidence (or with a prosecutor's affirmation) that you were actually factually innocent, so you could get some compensation even in the absence of an intentional violation of your civil rights. Texas is one state that has such a scheme, with important limitations, as explained in <a href="https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/2009/dec/15/ex-prisoners-acquitted-for-insufficient-evidence-may-not-sue-texas/" rel="noreferrer">this linked case</a>.</p>

<p>You would probably have to hire a lawyer with your own funds to bring either kind of lawsuit, and realistically, you wouldn't have been incarcerated for eight months pending trial if you had enough money to do that, because you would have posted bond and been released pending trial.</p>

<p>There may be one or two states (I can't recall any from memory) where there might be a right to compensation merely because you are acquitted, but this would be an extreme outlier in terms of U.S. law.</p>

<p>Outside the United States, outcomes could vary dramatically from one country to another. They relevant law in England and Wales is discussed in an answer to <a href="https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/23506/defendant-compensation-after-not-guilty-verdict">this question</a> at Law.SE. <a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/8/2/407/848174" rel="noreferrer">International human rights law</a> does not recognize a right to compensation in these circumstances.</p>

<p><a href="/questions/tagged/france" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;france&#39;" aria-label="show questions tagged &#39;france&#39;" rel="tag" aria-labelledby="tag-france-tooltip-container">france</a></p>
<p>Losses suffered through pre-trial detention <em>(détention provisoire)</em> are supposed to be compensated: <a href="https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006071154/LEGISCTA000006182924/#LEGISCTA000021331517" rel="nofollow noreferrer">code de procédure pénale, article 149</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>(...) la personne qui a fait l'objet d'une détention provisoire au cours d'une procédure terminée à son égard par une décision de non-lieu, de relaxe ou d'acquittement devenue définitive a droit, à sa demande, à réparation intégrale du préjudice moral et matériel que lui a causé cette détention. Toutefois, aucune réparation n'est due lorsque cette décision a pour seul fondement la reconnaissance de son irresponsabilité au sens de l'article 122-1 du code pénal, une amnistie postérieure à la mise en détention provisoire, ou la prescription de l'action publique intervenue après la libération de la personne, lorsque la personne était dans le même temps détenue pour une autre cause, ou lorsque la personne a fait l'objet d'une détention provisoire pour s'être librement et volontairement accusée ou laissé accuser à tort en vue de faire échapper l'auteur des faits aux poursuites (...)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Whoever was put into pre-trial detention within a procedure that ended with a final dismissal of charges or acquittal is entitled to full compensation for the moral and material prejudice suffered through the detention. However, no compensation is due when:</p>
<ul>
<li>acquittal is due to penal irresponsibility <em>[i.e. &quot;insanity defense&quot;]</em>;</li>
<li>the subject was granted amnesty after the pre-trial detention;</li>
<li>the statute of limitations runs out after the subject, detained for another reason, is freed;</li>
<li>the subject freely and voluntarily accused themselves, or wrongly let themselves be accused, in order to allow the real culprit to escape prosecution.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Court cases relating to such compensation are heard by the appeals court, and can be appealed to the <em>Commission nationale de réparation des détentions</em>, a subcommittee of the Cour de Cassation (highest appeal court in criminal matters). The Cour de Cassation website <a href="https://www.courdecassation.fr/la-cour/les-procedures-devant-la-cour-de-cassation/la-commission-nationale-de-reparation-des" rel="nofollow noreferrer">has a helpful analysis of the CNRD jurisprudence</a> if you are interested.</p>

criminal-law damages prison governmental-liability