Can the GPL be applied to non-software projects?
<p>I have an idea that I would like to distribute, but I do not want any legal restrictions (as in patents) to be applied to my idea. The idea is not all software (it is a smartphone design), so would it be legal for me to apply the GPL to my document and prevent patents?</p>

<p>Edit: Forgot to mention, I specifically prefer the GPLv2 over the newer v3.</p>

<p>I just did more research. According to the <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLHardware" rel="nofollow noreferrer">GPL FAQ's,</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Any material that can be copyrighted can be licensed under the GPL. GPLv3
can also be used to license materials covered by other copyright-like laws, &gt; such as semiconductor masks. So, as an example, you can release a drawing of &gt; a physical object or circuit under the GPL.</p>
<p>In many situations, copyright does not cover making physical hardware from a
drawing. In these situations, your license for the drawing simply can't exert any control over making or selling physical hardware, regardless of the license you use. When copyright does cover making hardware, for instance with IC masks, the GPL handles that case in a useful way.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So yes, I may use the GPL to apply a license to these ideas and designs.</p>

<p>It sounds like you're trying to do one of two things: stop people from patenting <em>your</em> idea, or stop people from building on your idea and patenting that. In neither case is any copyright license (including the GPL) likely to be of much help.</p>

<p>If all you want is to stop people from patenting <em>your</em> idea, you don't need to worry about licensing. One requirement for a patent is that the invention be new; if someone else has already shared the idea with the world before you apply for a patent, you can't get one.</p>

<p>On the other hand, if you want to stop people from patenting things derived from your idea, the GPL is not going to do anything to help you. The GPL is a copyright license. It authorizes licensees to exercise the exclusive rights of copyright: reproduction, distribution of copies, creation of derivatives, public display, and public performance. That's <em>all</em> it does.</p>

<p>Not everything is copyrightable. Functional aspects of something are <em>not</em> copyrightable; anything that'd be covered by a utility patent isn't going to be protected by copyright. Copyright protects creative works. Copyright might protect the specification you write, but only to the extent that there's creativity involved in actually writing the spec. It offers no protection to the system you're specifying. It protects the expression of ideas, not the ideas themselves.</p>

<p>If someone reads your spec, thinks of an improvement to your system, and describes their improvement (either referencing your spec or rephrasing it), they haven't done anything they need your permission for. You don't need a copyright license to read a specification or to make use of the ideas in it; "creating a derivative work" doesn't include cases where their thing is derivative of your <em>ideas</em>.</p>

<p>So what does the GPL patent clause mean? It doesn't mean "if you come up with your own thing you must not patent it." It means "if you redistribute <em>the covered work</em> or a derivative of it, you must license any relevant patents." If someone comes up with an idea for an improvement and writes up their own spec for that idea, they can share it with the world without worrying about your copyright (because copyrights don't cover ideas) or the GPL. The only way to stop this is to try to come up with a "patentleft" concept, but patents really aren't well-suited to this concept.</p>

patents gpl