Property law: title vs possession
<p>In property law what is the difference between Title and Possession? They basically sound like the same thing to me.</p>

<p>Title is legal ownership.  Possession is immediate control, often but not always physical control. For example, if I buy a book and lend it to my friend A, I have title to it, but A has possession. Or if I rent a house, the landlord has title (or possibly the landlord's bank does) but I have possession. If a thief steals something, the thief has possession, but not title.</p>
<p>Some kinds of property have a registered or written title. For example, land and houses usually do, and in many jurisdictions automobiles also do. Those will show the legal owner, and may well also show outstanding loans for which the property is collateral. The law may require that the written title be signed over, and/or that the transaction be recorded with a governmental authority and a new written title issued, when ownership of such property is transferred.</p>
<p>&quot;Lawful possession&quot; includes a lent or rented item of property, but not a stolen one — a thief does not have lawful possession.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=white%20house%20legal%20counsel&amp;FORM=NWRFSH" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Property rights</a> are pretty complex, but not out-of-reach if you are interested.  In the simplest of cases, title and possession held by the same person, which is why its easy to not understand the difference.   But the details <em>may</em> depend on the wording of a trust and what US state the property is in.   A common example is if there is a <a href="https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=white%20house%20legal%20counsel&amp;FORM=NWRFSH" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Deed of Trust</a> (or Mortgage) but that's only on form of complexity.   Explicit trusts are also fairly common.</p>

<p>The word <strong>title</strong> potentially ambiguous. Under <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_law" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Trust Law</a> (in jurisdictions like the US), legal title and equitable title can be held by different people and consist of different rights.   As an example on Explicit Trusts, base on my understanding, without trying to be exhaustive:</p>

<p>A <em>Trustee</em> may hold <strong>legal title</strong> to a house, but that doesn't mean he has rights to use it as he wishes.   A trust <em>Beneficiary</em> may be granted the right to use that house as long as they live, or to receive the income generated by renting it.   The Beneficiary has <strong>equitable title</strong>.    </p>

<p>If the beneficiary is living in the house, they have <strong>possession</strong> of it, but that doesn't mean they may sell it.   If a renter is living there, they could be said to have possession of it, but obviously can't sell it either.   If no one is living there, you would probably say the Trustee had possession, and he might be able to sell it, but not to himself, and the proceeds from the sale aren't his either. </p>

<p>If a trust is <strong>revocable</strong>, the situation gets even more complex, because the person who created the trust may have rights.   </p>

<p>Ownership or title must be distinguished from possession:
i) Buyer has title – Seller has possession:
Property in goods is not the same as possession. Although property in goods sold may
have passed to the buyer, but the seller may continue to be in possession of the goods
ii) Buyer has possession – owner has title:
On the other hand, person may be in possession of goods but title or ownership still
remains with the owner e.g. in hire-purchase of cars where the hirer has physical
possession of the goods but the title or ownership still remains with the finance company
until the final installment is discharged.</p>

united-states property