Website cloning is legal?
<p>Is using CSS, Javascript, HTML, or images from other websites on our website illegal because the contents may involve trademark or copyrighted assets?</p>
<p>I am using lot of partial or full content from other websites on my website because my website is about reviewing brands and websites, and commenting on the pro's and con's.</p>
<p>Currently I am using iframe, object, wget, file_get_contents, cURL and javascript to scrape or clone partial or full website content for my personal use.</p>
<p>I also generate revenue from using their content from advertising, SEO, affiliates and banners etc.</p>
<p>Would I get penalized by law enforcement if they found me, because I am scarping and cloning websites without the permission of real website owner?</p>
<p>And if it is illegal then why are there so many legal open source or paid software and applications for cloning of website like httrack, cyotek, webcopy etc?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Wikipedia : <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping#Legal_issues" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping#Legal_issues</a></p>
<p>Stackoverflow :
<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70697060/website-cloning-is-ethical-and-acceptable">https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70697060/website-cloning-is-ethical-and-acceptable</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Both the displayed site (including all text and images) and the html, css, javascript and other code that generates the display are protected by copyright. This is true in pretty much every country. You would <strong>not</strong> be able to reuse them lawfully without permission, unless an <em><strong>exception to copyright</strong></em> applies. If no exception applies, and you have not obtained permission, this is <strong>copyright infringement</strong>. In most cases copyright infringement is treated as a tort (a civil matter), not as a crime. This means that law enforcement generally will take no action and have no interest in such a situation.</p>
<p>The copyright owner could sue for infringement, and possibly collect money damages. In the US, statutory damages can be as high as $30,000, or up to $150,000 for &quot;wilful&quot; infringement, or as low as $750 (per work infringed). Or actual damages can be collected instead.  In other countries, actual damages plus costs of suit are more likely, but the rule can be different in each country.</p>
<p>The possible exceptions to copyright vary significantly in different countries.  In the US the major exception is <strong>Fair use</strong>. See <a href="https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/32422/is-this-copyright-infringement-is-it-fair-use-what-if-i-dont-make-any-money-o">Is this copyright infringement? Is it fair use? What if I don&#39;t make any money off it?</a> and <a href="https://law.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/541/i-have-a-question-about-copyright-what-should-i-read-before-i-ask-it">I have a question about copyright. What should I read before I ask it?</a> for more information  In general short snippets of code can probably be used under fair use, but substantial parts of the code or the displayed site are less likely to qualify as fair use.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>And if it is illegal then why are there so many legal open source or paid software and applications for cloning of website like httrack, cyotek, webcopy etc?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Most of these tools have legitimate uses, including learning how a site is constructed without distributing copied content; and cloning or partial cloning of a site <strong>with permission</strong>. Even if the tools were mostly used for unlawful copying, that might well not be a high priority for law enforcement, and cross-border law enforcement (which this in many cases would involve) is often much harder for the police and other authorities.</p>

copyright internet trademark