Convicted for murder and &quot;victim&quot; found alive
<p>In two works of fiction I read or saw, a person was convicted for murder when the victim was actually alive. (In one case, not <em>quite</em> alive - police take finger prints of an unknown 30 year old woman, freshly murdered, and finds that they match a 16 year old girl supposedly murdered 14 years before, with her father in jail for the murder.)</p>
<p>Now while this makes for an interesting story, have there been <strong>any real cases</strong> where this happened where <strong>A</strong> was convicted of murdering <strong>B</strong>, then later it is shown that <strong>B</strong> was well and alive long enough that <strong>A</strong> couldn't have been guilty? In addition to no evidence suggesting that <strong>A</strong> murdered someone else?</p>

<p><a href="/questions/tagged/australia" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;australia&#39;" aria-label="show questions tagged &#39;australia&#39;" rel="tag" aria-labelledby="australia-container">australia</a></p>
<p>Although the alleged victim has not been found, this case from the <a href="https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1986/09/25/Murder-conviction-overturned-after-victim-is-seen-alive/9157528004800/" rel="noreferrer">upi.com</a> archives dated 25/09/1986 is worthy of note (emphasis mine):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A woman jailed for murdering her husband had her conviction reversed when a witness testified she saw the man on television -- in a crowd at a cricket match -- three years after he allegedly was killed.</p>
<p>The New South Wales Court of Appeal Wednesday overturned the murder conviction of Margaret Burton, saying the case against her relied on a web of circumstantial evidence and that the new evidence provided reasonable doubt of her guilt.</p>
<p>Burton, however, still must complete an 8-year sentence for conspiracy to commit murder.</p>
<p>She was sentenced to life in prison on Nov. 8, 1984, for the May 1983 murder of her husband. She and Ronald Burke, a close friend, also were sentenced to eight years in jail for conspiracy to murder her husband, Peter Burton.</p>
<p><strong>Peter Burton's body never was found.</strong></p>
<p>At the appeals court hearing, Judy Edmonds testified she is sure she saw Peter Burton in the crowd at a televised cricket match in January.</p>
<p>Edmonds was shown a videotape of part of the cricket match and identified a man in sunglasses as Peter Burton. She said she was a close friend of his.</p>
<p>Another witness, Jan Dyson, told the court the man in the videotape bore a remarkable resemblance to Peter Burton.</p>
<p>Lawyers for Margaret Burton argued before the appeals court her conviction should be overturned because the prosecution failed to prove Peter Burton was dead.</p>
<p>Appeals Court Chief Justice Sir Laurence Street agreed, saying <strong>it is not for the court to decide whether or not the person on the videotape is Peter Burton, but it is the court's responsibility to determine how a reasonable jury would have regarded the new evidence.</strong></p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="/questions/tagged/spain" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;spain&#39;" aria-label="show questions tagged &#39;spain&#39;" rel="tag" aria-labelledby="spain-container">spain</a></p>
<p>There was a quite famous case in Spain in 1910, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_Cuenca" rel="noreferrer">Crime of Cuenca</a>.</p>
<p>A man disappeared from a village, and an investigation didn't find anything. A couple of years later popular pressure lead to the investigation being reopened and two suspects being interrogated until they confessed under torture. 16 years after the alleged murder, the victim showed up alive in the village and it was discovered that he had gone away voluntarily and lived since then in a town 100 km away.</p>
<p>By then the accused were already free after 12 years in prison but the sentence were eventually overturned. Those held responsible of justice miscarriage were tried but finally acquitted.</p>

<p><a href="/questions/tagged/canada" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;canada&#39;" aria-label="show questions tagged &#39;canada&#39;" rel="tag" aria-labelledby="canada-container">canada</a></p>
<p>The <em>Criminal Code</em> provides for <a href="https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/ccr-rc/rep22-rap22/p1.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ministerial review of a conviction</a> when there is new and significant information:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>An application for ministerial review must be supported by “new matters of significance” – generally new information that has surfaced since the trial and appeal and therefore has not been presented to the courts and has not been considered by the Minister on a prior application.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The new information must be:</p>
<ul>
<li>reasonably capable of belief</li>
<li>relevant to guilt</li>
<li>could have affected the verdict if presented at trial</li>
</ul>
<p>Finding that the victim identified in the charging document was not even dead would absolutely meet the threshold for Ministerial review.<sup>1.</sup></p>
<hr />
<p><sup>1. If the Minister's decision or process contains reviewable errors, then the Minister's decision itself can be quashed on judicial review. The Minister's process must conform to the procedure set out in the <a href="https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-2002-416/page-1.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>Regulations Respecting Applications for Ministerial Review — Miscarriages of Justice</em></a>. The Minister's substantive decision is reviewed on a reasonableness standard. See <em>Canada (Justice) v. D.V.</em>, <a href="https://canlii.ca/t/jsnpb#par13" rel="nofollow noreferrer">2022 FCA 181 at paras. 13-21</a>.</sup></p>

<p>Just doing a quick text search on the Wikipedia <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrongful_convictions_in_the_United_States" rel="noreferrer">list of wrongful convictions in the US</a> for things like &quot;living&quot; and &quot;alive&quot; I found three and a half (the half is the person definitely was dead/murdered but the prosecution's case depended on the murder happening on a specific day and other people testified that actually they had seen the person alive after that day)...</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Marion was convicted of killing John Cameron, who left with him to work on the railroad in 1872. In 1891, four years after Marion's execution by hanging, Cameron turned up alive, explaining that he had vanished by his own volition. He had spent twenty years traveling across Mexico, Alaska, and Colorado. On March 25, 1987, Marion was pardoned posthumously by the State of Nebraska on the 100th anniversary of his hanging.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Hudspeth and George Watkins's wife Rebecca were arrested. After lengthy interrogation, Rebecca allegedly made a statement accusing Hudspeth of murdering Watkins to get him out of the way so they could be married. Based on Rebecca's testimony, Hudspeth was convicted and sentenced to death. He was hanged at Harrison, Arkansas, on December 30, 1892. In 1893, Hudspeth's lawyer located the alleged victim, George Watkins, alive and well in Kansas.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Wilson was convicted of murdering his wife, Jenny Willson, and their 19-month-old daughter. Bones presented by the prosecution in court were later discovered to be those of at least four or five people and likely of indigenous ethnicity. Wilson received a formal pardon from the Alabama governor after his wife and daughter were discovered to be living in Vincennes, Indiana.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Allen Ray Jenkins, age 56, was found dead on April 14, 1995, in his home in Aulander, North Carolina. He had been shot twice in the chest with a shotgun. In the days and weeks after the murder, the police talked to several disinterested witnesses who said they had seen Jenkins alive as late as April 10.[188] Two teenage girls testified that they were involved in a conspiracy involving Gell in exchange for a lower sentence. Gell was in prison or otherwise out of town for all but one day in April. Although the date of death is unknown, prosecutors hitched their timeline to that date. Gell's conviction was overturned after it was later discovered that prosecutors had withheld exculpatory evidence, including the testimony of 17 witnesses who said they had seen Jenkins alive after that date as well as a tape recording of one of the girls saying that she had to make up a story to tell the police. Gell was retried and acquitted of all charges.[189]</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There is the case of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natasha_Ryan" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Natasha Ryan</a>. She was simply given a fine for instigating an investigation into her false murder.</p>

criminal-law murder wrongful-conviction