Why &quot;it is unlawful for X to do Y&quot; rather than &quot;it is illegal for X to do Y&quot;?
<p>It is <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/story/10376739/1/unlawful-vs-illegal.html" rel="noreferrer">said</a> that unlawful means "not permitted by law" and illegal means "forbidden by law".</p>

<p>However, I cannot recall <em>ever</em> seeing the phrase "it is illegal to ..." when reading legal text.  Instead, the phrasing used is "it is <em>unlawful</em> to...".</p>

<p>Why does legal text never (or at least very rarely) seem to say that something is <em>illegal</em> rather than merely <em>unlawful</em>? Is there a legal/technical reason, or does it just sound fancier?</p>

<p>I found an example of "is illegal" in <a href="https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=78.52.467" rel="noreferrer">RCW 78.52.467</a>: "If the department believes that any oil, gas, or product is illegal...". There are some examples of "shall be illegal", e.g. <a href="https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=39.84.050" rel="noreferrer">RCW 39.84.050</a> "It shall be illegal for a director, officer, agent", where "illegal" is used predicatively. I tenatively conclude than the latter kind of use is less frequent that the adjectival use.</p>

<p>Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Pocket ed does not include "illegal" except in some "illegal"+noun constructions, but it does list "unlawful" alone. "Unlawful" has been used since 1387 (J. Trevisa translation of Ranulf Higden <em>Polychronicon</em>), whereas "illegal" only goes back to 1626. Legal language tends to be very conservative, so the fact that "unlawful" got there first (aided no doubt by the fact that it is an Anglo-Saxon construction, not a medieval Latin borrowing) gives the term priority in legal usage. It sounds more legal to say "(un)lawful" that "(il)legal".</p>

<p>Because we have synonyms. Also, <a href="http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/business-career/legal/unlawful-versus-illegal" rel="nofollow noreferrer">one take</a> is because, semantically, there is a difference in degree. Something illegal would be expressly proscribed by a law; something unlawful would mean something is not expressly authorized. </p>

<p><a href="https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/illegal" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Another take</a>, however, says that illegal means against the law while unlawful is an act that is a contravention of rules in a given context. An example of this explanation would be catching the ball with your hands in a soccer/futbol game (assuming you are not tending goal)... It would be unlawful, but not illegal. </p>

<p>Finally, this answer over at StackExchange English provides another <a href="https://english.stackexchange.com/a/14445/260243">take</a>.</p>

<p><strong><em>Addition:</em></strong> </p>

<p>According to <a href="https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2013/07/illegal-unlawful.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Grammarphobia.com</a>, in Black's Law Dictionary, illegal is "forbidden by law; unlawful." Unlawful is "not authorized by law; illegal." However, unlawful includes two other parts: "criminally punishable" and "involving moral turpitude." </p>

<p>However, earlier editions of Black's, such as the 1910 second edition say:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>‘Unlawful’ and ‘illegal’ are frequently used as synonymous terms, but, in the proper sense of the word, ‘unlawful,’ as applied to promises, agreements, considerations, and the like, denotes that they are ineffectual in law because they involve acts which, although not illegal, i.e., positively forbidden, are disapproved of by the law, and are therefore not recognized as the ground of legal rights, either because they are immoral or because they are against public policy. It is on this ground that contracts in restraint of marriage or of trade are generally void.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Finally, according to Oxford's English Dictionary, illegal comes from the French word <em>illégal</em> or the Latin <em>illegalis</em> whereas unlawful comes from Old English.</p>

statutes