Can an American material witness be forced to &quot;learn&quot; what s/he does not know?
<p>My understanding is that a witness is supposed to prepare for a deposition. My first concern is how well prepared or knowledgeable for a deposition.</p>

<p>Suppose a material witness made a point of studying his adversary's liabilities thoroughly, and his own side's superficially. The witness then recites chapter and verse about his adversary's liability, and honestly says, "I don't know" about his side's. Can the opposing lawyer ask him, with effect, "why do you know so much about some topics, and so little about others?" Will the witness have fallen short in his duty? Can s/he be forced to learn more to be more responsive to the opposing lawyer's questions?</p>

<h2>A witness can only testify to what they witnessed</h2>

<p>That means their testimony can only be what they personally saw or heard (or, more rarely, touched, smelled and tasted). They cannot testify to the truth of what someone else told them (although they can testify that they were told it) - that’s called hearsay and it’s inadmissible.</p>

<p>A witness cannot <em>learn</em> things after the event and testify to them.</p>

<p>Generally speaking, a witness has no duty to "learn" anything in anticipation of a deposition. Witnesses are required to testify from their personal knowledge, which may be expansive or limited, given her intellectual capacity and preparation.</p>

<p>If the deposition is about a car crash, for instance, there is nothing requiring the witness to learn the layout of the intersection or the timing of the traffic lights, but nor is there any legal reason a witness could not watch 500 hours of video footage of the intersection and then testify to those things. The weight assigned to that testimony is a question for the factfinder, but legally, there is nothing improper about it.</p>

<p>While a witness is not required to <em>learn</em> information in advance of a deposition, a witness may be required to <em>assemble</em> information for the deposition. Under <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_30" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Rule 30</a>(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for instance, a party calling a deposition may generally require the deponent to arrive for the deposition with records or other evidence in hand.</p>

<p>A notable exception to the general rule is Rule 30(b)(6), which allows a party to depose an organization, such as a corporation or governmental entity. Under that rule, one party notifies the organization that it wishes to ask questions on specified subjects. The organization is then required to designate a person to testify on those subjects, and that person is required to learn all the facts "known or reasonably available to the organization" regarding those subjects.</p>

united-states deposition