What legal relief is available when a neighbour uses my address as his own for communication without written consent from me?
<p>A property, say plot no.31, was sub-divided into two parts. After subdivision the plot number on record for the newly created subdivision was, say, 31-A; the original plot number remained 31.</p>
<p>The division was challenged, and the challenge dismissed at all levels after the first initial success. Many years later, after the challenger passed away and that sub-division was inherited by the challenger's heirs, it was discovered that even after dismissal the challenger continued to use the postal address of the challenged sub-division. This continued for years even when the heirs too knew from record that the address was 31-A instead of 31. When asked the postal department stated the address being next door, all mail was delivered assuming the misstated address  to be simple oversight by the sender/s. Even assuming defence by 31-A claim the misrepresentation was by oversight, it comes across as far-fetched for such oversight to continue for whole decades.</p>
<p>What legal relief is available when a neighbour uses my address as his own for communication without written consent from me? Is the the postal department also culpable?</p>
<p>EDIT: To follow up with @eis' answer that tort demands establishing damage here is my concern. Documents which establish proof of address s.a. Utility Bills - telephone, energy, water service lose clarity. If so inclined, one may call this behaviour causing loss of value to the property simply because it amounts to squatting - if only on paper.</p>
<p>EDIT 2: Pursuant to the comment by R.M below, an additional question that comes to mind is as follows -</p>
<ul>
<li>Could such use of my address as an alias for their own address serve to establish 'proof of residence'? For instance, some days ago I encountered a pizza delivery boy waiting outside my premises. Upon enquiry he intimated the pizza was to be delivered to them but the address given by them was mine.</li>
</ul>

<p>Mark the mail delivered as &quot;addressee unknown, return to sender&quot; and give it to the postal delivery person next time around. If the mail stops getting through, the neighbor will update their address.</p>

<p>Based on the description, there is no legal relief available.</p>
<p>To quote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>a tort is breach of a non-contractual duty which has caused damage to
the plaintiff giving rise to a civil cause of action and for which
remedy is available.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To establish a tort, you need to establish that damage has occurred. Since mail is simply being delivered to the correct location despite the address, and you don't claim any harm having occurred, it does not sound like you have suffered any damage, hence no legal relief is available.</p>
<hr />
<p>You added:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Documents which establish proof of address s.a. Utility Bills - telephone, energy, water service lose clarity. If so inclined, one may call this behaviour causing loss of value to the property simply because it amounts to squatting - if only on paper.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But you need to establish damage having happened. In general you would need to have receipts proving the amount of money you have lost. You don't have a bill to pay for losing clarity, hence you can't prove that you've suffered any damage.</p>

<h2>None</h2>
<p>Unless the neighbour was a company (which, since they died, they can’t be), or they are giving out false information (like the address) with the intention of committing a crime like fraud.</p>
<p>You could, perhaps, have sought an injunction for them to stop but it seems unlikely the court would grant it since it doesn’t appear to have caused you or anyone else any harm. In any event, any remedy you might have had ended with the person’s death.</p>

<p>Firstly, the fact that utility bills can be used to prove title to the property is in itself a cause for worry, and can also constitute a cause of action by itself. This is due to the mere fact that these documents, can in fact, constitute proof of address, for example, for <a href="https://cleartax.in/s/gst-registration-documents-checklist" rel="nofollow noreferrer">GST registration</a> of the individual.</p>
<p>Further, you can refer to the following court cases which have treated utility bills as proof of title on a balance of probabilities.</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="https://www.lawyerservices.in/Nileshkumar-Hiralal-Modi-Versus-Hitesh-Kaushi-Kumar-Modi-2012-07-17" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Nileshkumar Hiralal Modi v/s Hitesh Kaushi Kumar Modi</a> at paragraphs 10 and 15.</li>
<li><a href="https://indiankanoon.org/doc/79916882/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Rabari Nagjibhai Maneklal vs Nilamben Upendrabhai Shah</a> at paragraph 56</li>
</ol>
<p>Since you are the owner of property with presumably a perfect title, you are entitled to file a suit for <strong>mandatory injunction</strong> which will prevent the neighbour from using your address, there being &quot;<em>no standard to ascertain the actual damage caused</em>&quot;. This relief is provided under <a href="https://www.indiacode.nic.in/show-data?actid=AC_CEN_3_20_00009_196347_1517807320084&amp;sectionId=30253&amp;sectionno=38&amp;orderno=42" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963</a>.</p>
<p>You must also bear in mind that, if the neighbour also claims title, you may have to contest the title to the suit property since this remedy will not then be available to you, and instead you will have to claim for declaratory relief first as per the guidelines by the Supreme Court of India in paragraph 13 of <a href="https://indiankanoon.org/doc/540361/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By Lrs &amp; Ors</a></p>

india tort