Was displaying a gun in a cartoon in the 1990s on MTV in the USA illegal or controversial somehow?
<p>At the 01:10 mark in the 12th episode of the 7th season of Beavis and Butt-Head, &quot;Citizens Arrest&quot;, first aired in 1997, they are at Burger World as a robber comes in and takes out his gun. Just before this happens, they cut from the overall shot to a close-up of Beavis and Butt-Head, and linger on this up-close shot far too long, as the boys look amazed by the gun which is never actually shown to the viewers. When it cuts back to the wide shot, the gunman has just put the gun back into his jacket, covering it entirely.</p>
<p>The gun is never shown to the viewer.</p>
<p>Granted there is no law saying that they <em>have</em> to show this, just because it's in the scene, but the scene strikes me as very unnatural and odd every time I watch it. I suspect it's some kind of self-censorship.</p>

<p>There was from 1954-2001 a non-governmental code of conduct called the &quot;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code_Authority" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Comics Code</a>&quot; that established industry norms for content in comics and animated media that included an aversion to displaying guns in certain contexts, and the almost violation of the Code in 1990 is what led to the controversy.</p>
<p>But, it was never against the law to do so. It was merely a violation of the norms of the industry and the company policies of the companies that adhered to it, an an industry which had only a few dominant participants, all of whom agreed to it, thus making it quite effective in practice.</p>

firearms