If a Politician uses an Organized Crime Syndicate to extort a Business, is the Politician guilty of the same crime as the Syndicate?
<p>In the United States, let's say you have:</p>
<ul>
<li>A generic <code>POLITICIAN</code> of any type</li>
<li>A generic <code>ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE</code> of any type</li>
<li>A generic <code>BUSINESS</code> of any type</li>
</ul>
<p>If an <code>ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE</code> pressures a <code>BUSINESS</code> to make campaign contributions to a <code>POLITICIAN</code>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>The <code>ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE</code> would be guilty of extortion</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Correct, or is there more to it?</p>
<p>Additionally, what if the <code>POLITICIAN</code> had influence with the <code>ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE</code> and encouraged the <code>ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE</code> to extort the <code>BUSINESS</code>? What crime would the <code>POLITICIAN</code> be guilty of?</p>

<p>My understanding is that the syndicate would be committing an act of extortion.</p>
<p>Under the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act" rel="nofollow noreferrer">RICO Act</a>,
<strong>IF</strong> the politician conspired with the syndicate
<strong>OR IF</strong> the politician had something like an <em>'understanding'</em> with the syndicate,
then they (any, and all involved) could be charged with the crime (extortion), racketeering and conspiracy.</p>
<p>Additional crimes/laws to consider:</p>
<ol>
<li>Campaign finance violations</li>
<li>Money laundering</li>
<li>Compelled speech (1st Amendment)</li>
</ol>

<h2><a href="https://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/criminal/conspiracy.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Conspiracy</a></h2>
<blockquote>
<p>The crime of conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons to commit an unlawful act with the intention of carrying it out. It is the intention to carry out the crime which constitutes the necessary <em>mens rea</em> for the offence: <em>Yip Chiu-Cheung v R (1994) 99 Cr App R 406</em> at 410, per Lord Griffiths; <em>R v Wilson (unrep, 12/08/94, NSWCCA)</em>.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There are a lot of if's in your question as you are describing a general situation. The crime that you are describing is,
In general, extortion. But if it actually turned out that say some of the directors of the company had an agreement with the politicians,  then that would also be understood as conspiracy.</p>
<p>Moreover, the actual crime needs to be taken into account.
For example, if the  crime was money laundering or forced labour then these crimes would be charged under these indictments.</p>
<p>Take for instance the recent uncovering of a torture chamber by the Norwegian police after breaking into an organised federation of criminal organisations operating secretly via EncroChat. This crime would be indicted under
Section 102 of Norway's Penal Code:Crimes against humanity.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Any person is liable for punishment for crimes against humanity who as part of a broad or systematic attack on a civilian population...</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>e) imprisons or in some other serious manner deprives a person of liberty contrary to the fundamental rules of international law</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>[and]  f) tortures a person in his/her custody or control by causing serious physical or mental pain.</p>
</blockquote>

finance politics extortion campaign