Requested to remove YouTube embeds?
<p>I used the YouTube API to play a series of videos hosted by one particular YouTube channel of national (US) prestige. About a month later, I received a letter from one of their attorneys requesting to remove the "republished" videos since permission was not granted. They pointed to the YouTube <a href="https://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms" rel="nofollow noreferrer">terms of service</a> (5B):</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>You shall not copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, broadcast,
  display, sell, license, or otherwise exploit any Content for any other
  purposes without the prior written consent of YouTube or the
  respective licensors of the Content.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>However, my research and re-reading of the terms seems like it's pretty cut and dry that if the embedding functionality is offered, it's fair to use (non-monetary purposes at that) (6C):</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>You also hereby grant each user of the Service a non-exclusive license
  to access your Content through the Service, and to use, reproduce,
  distribute, display and perform such Content as permitted through the
  functionality of the Service and under these Terms of Service.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>These two sections seem in conflict with each other (<em>You've granted permissions for users to do these things, but "under these Terms of Service" they must receive your permission?</em>).</p>

<p>What I've read (Quora, blog posts, etc) suggests that what I had built violated no copyright and was well within the terms of service.</p>

<p>I've taken the material down, so I'm not looking for specific legal advice in this specific situation, but I am curious about how this community would interpret this situation. Right or wrong, I have no time, money, or energy to fight them for what was a single page side project, but given how pervasive embedding YouTube videos is, some clarity on the above two clauses would be valuable!</p>

<p>The question that you need to answer is whether, when you embed, you "copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, broadcast, display, sell, license, or otherwise exploit any Content". It seems that you have done that, i.e. you didn't just "watch". The next question is whether you have "prior written consent of YouTube". Youtube requires a license from contributors granting users the right to "access your Content through the Service, <em>and to use, reproduce, distribute, display and perform such Content as permitted through the functionality of the Service and under these Terms of Service</em>".</p>

<p>To fill the gap, you have to determine whether your act of embedding is permitted by the Youtube TOS. Their TOS states §2A that "The Service" includes the YouTube "Embeddable Player". It also says §4</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>YouTube hereby grants you permission to access and use the Service as
  set forth in these Terms of Service, provided that: (A) You agree not
  to distribute in any medium any part of the Service or the Content
  without YouTube's prior written authorization, unless YouTube makes
  available the means for such distribution through functionality
  offered by the Service (such as the Embeddable Player).</p>
</blockquote>

<p>On the face of it and as long as you do the stuff that follows in B-I, you have complied with that requirement and therefore you have written permission from Youtube. </p>

terms-of-service youtube