Does German law have an equivalent of the &quot;plain meaning rule&quot;?
<p>I recently read about the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_meaning_rule" rel="nofollow noreferrer">plain meaning rule</a> that seems to be a principle in the application of English laws.</p>

<p><strong>I would like to know whether a similar principle is either codified or known as a common principle in the interpretation of laws in Germany.</strong></p>

<p>On the one hand, the rule sounds like a sane basis for interpreting a text that is not accompanied by explicit definitions.</p>

<p>On the other hand, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_meaning_rule" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikipedia article</a> is not linked to any German equivalent (for what it's worth, it is not linked to any equivalent in any other language). Also, cases come to mind where German courts did not seem to apply an "ordinary meaning"<sup>1</sup>. It is well possible, however, that such cases are exceptions (that became well-known precisely due to their exceptional character) rather than the "normal procedure".</p>

<p>If this concept does exist in German law, is there any specific term normally used to refer to this concept?</p>

<hr>

<p><sup>1</sup>: I mean instances like the infamous ruling on the duration of military service vs. alternative civilian service. "The duration of X must not exceed the duration of Y." was interpreted in such a way that "duration" refers to the effort/stress level, which must be equal, while X may very well last for a longer time than Y. Or, alternatively, that Y might theoretically imply additional phases of related activity in the future, which are counted towards the duration that X is compared to. (<a href="http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13513989.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">link only in German</a>)</p>

<p>Yes.*</p>
<p>The four classical rules of construction, when it comes to legal terms not explicitly defined are (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_interpretation#European_perception" rel="nofollow noreferrer">source</a>):</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Grammatical interpretation: using the literal meaning of the statutory text.</li>
<li>Historical interpretation: using the legislative history, to reveal the intent of the legislator.</li>
<li>Systematic interpretation: considering the context of provisions, if only by acknowledging in which chapter a provision is listed.</li>
<li>Teleological interpretation: considering the <em>purpose</em> of the statute is considered, as it appears from legislative history, or other
observations.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>(This list is not understood to be exhaustive; for example <em>verfassungskonforme Auslegung</em> means a preference to construct a statute in a way that is consistent with constitutional law, akin to the <em>constitutional avoidance</em> principle in US law.)</p>
<p>The first one certainly is a principle &quot;similar to the plain meaning rule.&quot;
Searchable keywords are <em>grammatische Auslegung</em> and <em>Auslegung nach dem Wortsinne</em>.</p>
<hr />
<p>*) But the context is different when you're comparing German jurisprudence to its equivalents in common law countries. See for example @ohwilleke's comment.</p>

germany interpretation