Texas SB8 Consequences
<p>ABC news reports:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Supreme Court will take up the Texas abortion law on the merits
next month in a rare highly-expedited case that could definitively
resolve the fate of its six-week ban and unprecedented enforcement
mechanism.</p>
<p>SB8 will remain in effect for the near future until the Court issues
its decision, which wouldn’t typically be expected for weeks to months
after a case is argued.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If SB8 is found to be unconstitutional, would impacted parties (women that were denied abortions, abortion providers,) be precluded from relief resulting from SB8?</p>

<p>There is no prospect for equitable relief in such an outcome. The Texas state government enjoys sovereign immunity, except as specified under the <a href="https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/cp/htm/cp.101.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Tort Claims Act</a>. Under that law, immunity is waived only in the case of damage caused by negligence of a state employee, and is limited primarily to vehicle accidents and physical injuries. So the state cannot be sued for passing a law found to be unconstitutional. An individual would not enjoy such immunity, but given the law, there is no identifiable defendant to seek relief from (<em>everybody</em> is a potential defendant). An former abortion provider who now declines to perform an abortion can't be sued, because doctors in general have no obligation to perform particular medical procedures (most doctors in Texas <em>won't</em> perform an abortion, even before SB8), and the course will not render a judgment against a doctor on the grounds that they obeyed an existing law but should have known that it would be found unconstitutional.</p>

texas-sb8 equitable-relief