Does a company need to trademark every similar combination of words?
<p>Hypothetically, Bob founds a company named “Dog Cake”. Bob is afraid of imitators and for good reason- people respond with companies named “Dog Cakes”,
“Dogscakes”, “The dog Cakes”, “A Dog Cake” and “Dogs Cakes”.</p>
<p>Would USPTO protect Bob from these? Would he have had to register all these combinations individually?</p>

<h1>No</h1>
<p>You can only apply for a trademark that you actually use in commerce.</p>
<p>Then, the trademark office will decide if your name is ok. Let's say &quot;Bob's Cars&quot; is applied to. That is not trademarkable as it is too generic! Anyone with the name Bob who owns a car sales floor can accurately call that Bob's Cars. Dog Cake is just as generic and thus not trademarkable. USPTO has in or around 2007, using this vein, denied registering hotels.com, <a href="https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-federal-circuit/1155088.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a lawsuit in the federal circuit of appeals was a loss in July 2009</a>: even with .com, it was <strong>generic</strong> and not allowed as a trademark, it was not distinguishing itself. Similarly, <a href="https://casetext.com/case/in-re-1800mattresscom" rel="nofollow noreferrer">in the appeal of matress.com</a> the court did decide that:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Any term that the relevant public understands to refer to the genus of ‘online retail store services in the field of mattresses, beds and bedding’ is generic.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As such, a company named Bob's Cars is generally owned by Bob and selling cars. That is generic and is understood as Bob selling cars by the public. It can't be specific. Cakes for dogs are Dog Cakes. Any cake for a dog is a Dog Cake. It is just as generic as Bob selling cars.</p>
<p>However, if a brand has managed <em>without</em> protection to become non-generic before applying, then it can apply for a trademark with the whole name, as <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-46_8n59.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Booking.com managed to do in 2020</a> - <strong>however</strong> that verdict hinges on the fact that the site booking.com managed to become distinct from being 'just a generic retail store service in the field of' booking travel to be its own thing:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A term styled “generic.com” is a generic name for a class of goods
or services only if the term has that meaning to consumers.</p>
</blockquote>

united-states trademark