If a crime is committed against a poor person , are judges likelier to either interpret the law in a way that favours poor people or punish harshly?
<p>Would there be any problems with a judge or a court doing this ? and is there any legal arguments against something like this at a trial ?</p>

<p><a href="/questions/tagged/canada" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;canada&#39;" aria-label="show questions tagged &#39;canada&#39;" rel="tag" aria-labelledby="tag-canada-tooltip-container">canada</a></p>
<p>Courts have recognized that it is an aggravating factor when a person's crime has affected a vulnerable population including people whose vulnerability stems from economic disadvantage or dependence.</p>
<p>The <em>Criminal Code</em> <em>requires</em> judges to consider such circumstance. It says the sentencing judge must consider (s. 718.2(a)(1)(iii.1)):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>evidence that the offence had a significant impact on the victim, considering their age and other personal circumstances, including their health <strong>and financial situation</strong></p>
</blockquote>

india