Under article 128 of Narcotic law in Indonesia, Users are protected from being charged under what laws?
<p><a href="http://www.flevin.com/id/lgso/translations/JICA%20Mirror/english/4868_UU_35_2009_e.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.flevin.com/id/lgso/translations/JICA%20Mirror/english/4868_UU_35_2009_e.html</a></p>
<p>Article 128</p>
<p>(3) Narcotics addicts that are old enough as referred to in Article 55 paragraph (2) are currently undergoing medical rehabilitation 2 (two) times the period of medical treatment in the hospital and/or medical rehabilitation institutions designated by the government was not sentenced.</p>
<p>Was not sentenced with what?</p>
<p>One lawyer says that a person going through rehabilitation will not be prosecuted by article 111 to 127 of the same law. However, the lawyer said he knows it from cops. Another lawyer says it won't help. Also the lawyer says that this applies only if amount of physical evidence is lower than some threshold.</p>
<p>Is it true? If so, where is it written?</p>

<blockquote>
<p>One lawyer says that a person going through rehabilitation will not be
prosecuted by article 111 to 127 of the same law. However, the lawyer
said he knows it from cops. Another lawyer says it won't help. Also
the lawyer says that this applies only if amount of physical evidence
is lower than some threshold.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It isn't at all uncommon for the law to be unclear or ambiguous.</p>
<p>The correct meaning may be indeterminate, in which case you have to assume that in the event of a dispute, that any possible interpretation could be ruled to be correct. There isn't always one &quot;true&quot; answer.</p>
<p>If law enforcement has a clear view of what that means, this is important to know, whether or not this view is &quot;correct&quot; in an absolute sense.</p>
<p>What you need to know and what is helpful depends a great deal upon why you need to know.</p>

criminal-law