Does the statute of limitations apply in the case of Tara Reade?
<p>From this article <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/former-biden-staffer-tara-reade-files-sexual-assault-complaint-2020-4" rel="noreferrer">https://www.businessinsider.com/former-biden-staffer-tara-reade-files-sexual-assault-complaint-2020-4</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>A woman who accused Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden of sexually assaulting her when she worked for him in 1993 has filed a formal criminal complaint with the Washington, DC, police about the alleged incident, Business Insider has learned. [...] The statute of limitations for the alleged assault has passed. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Is that really the case? As I understand it, the DC Sexual Abuse Statute of Limitations Amendment Act (passed January 23, 2019) removed the statute of limitations on sexual assault in Washington, D.C. and added a revival period. The most concise explanation I could find was here <a href="https://www.chaikinandsherman.com/blog/2019/january/dc-lawmakers-sign-sexual-abuse-amendment-act-to-/" rel="noreferrer">https://www.chaikinandsherman.com/blog/2019/january/dc-lawmakers-sign-sexual-abuse-amendment-act-to-/</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>2-year revival period – In addition to extending the SOL for civil sex abuse claims, the Act also creates a 2-year “revival period” for claims that have already expired under the old statute of limitations. That means there is now a 2-year window in which victims can bring previously barred claims now allowed under the new statute of limitations.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>No part of the D.C. Sexual Abuse Statute of Limitations Amendment Act of 2018 applies in the case of Tara Reade. The statue of limitations for criminal prosecution had already expired under the existing law and was not revived by the amendment.</p>

<p>You are correct that there is a difference between the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution and civil suits. Phoog's answer cites information that is specifically about civil suits, and as it says, the statue of limitations for civil action has also expired. (I have not seen any reports of Reade filing a civil suit.)</p>

<ul>
<li><blockquote>
  <p>Tara Reade filed a criminal complaint with the Washington Metropolitan Police Department </p>
</blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote>
  <p>Reade also confirmed that the statute of limitations around the claims against Biden have passed.</p>
  
  <p>"I filed a police report for safety reasons only. All crim [sic] stats beyond limitations. Gratitude for all who have stood by me," <a href="https://twitter.com/ReadeAlexandra/status/1248793067735273478" rel="noreferrer">Reade tweeted</a>.</p>
</blockquote></li>
</ul>

<p>("<a href="https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-sexual-assault-police-tara-reade-1497391" rel="noreferrer">JOE BIDEN SEXUAL ASSAULT ACCUSER TARA READE FILES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT</a>", by Ewan Palmer, 4/11/20, newsweek.com)</p>

<p>The web page <a href="http://www.davidgrosso.org/grosso-analysis/2019/10/7/sexual-abuse-statute-of-limitations-amendment-act-of-2018-two-year-window-guide" rel="noreferrer">Sexual Abuse Statute of Limitations Amendment Act of 2018 - Two Year Window Guide</a>, on <a href="http://www.davidgrosso.org/" rel="noreferrer">http://www.davidgrosso.org/</a>, has a link to <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/528921fce4b089ab61d013d3/t/5d9bdee83395c75c23e294a5/1570496232825/dc_infographic_10.4.19v4.pdf" rel="noreferrer">fact sheet</a> summarizing the changes.</p>

<p>There is no statute of limitations for criminal cases regarding sexual abuse committed after May 3, 2019. But sexual abuse crimes committed earlier whose statute of limitations had already expired by that date under the old law cannot be prosecuted.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Section 4(a) shall apply to an offense committed before, on, or, after the effective date of this act, <strong>unless the statute of limitations for the offense expired before the effective date of this act</strong>.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/laws/22-311.html" rel="noreferrer">D.C. Law 22-311. Sexual Abuse Statute of Limitations Amendment Act of 2018.</a>, Sec. 5. (b) </p>

<p>The previous statute of limitations seems to have been 15 or in some cases 10 years, so for a crime committed in 1993, the statue of limitations would have expired by 2019.</p>

<p>The 2-year revival period only applies to civil suits:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a claim <strong>for the recovery of damages</strong> that would be time-barred under D.C. Official Code § 12-301 before the effective date of this act, but that would not be time-barred under section 3, is revived and, in that case, a cause of action may be commenced within 2 years after the effective date of this act.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>(<strong>Sec. 5. (a)(2)</strong>)</p>

<p>The two year period applies to cases that were barred under the old statute of limitations but are &quot;now allowed under the new statute of limitations.&quot;  If the claim is so old that would be barred under the new statute, it cannot be brought during the two-year window.</p>
<p>For civil claims, the new statute basically says that the claim must be brought within five years or before the victim's 40th birthday, whichever is later.  Unless the victim was working on Capitol Hill as a 13-year-old, she is over 40 and the claim is barred even under the new statute.</p>
<p>From the article you cite:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><p>Victims under 35 – In cases where sexual abuse occurred when the victim was less than 35 years old, they can bring civil claims for compensation any time up to the age of 40, OR 5 years from when they knew or reasonably should have known of a sexually abusive act, whichever is later.</p>
</li>
<li><p>Victims 35 or older – In cases where victims were 35 years of age or older, they may bring civil claims within 5 years from when they knew or should have known of the abusive act.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

sexual-assault statute-of-limitations