Can Oracle sue JSON users?
<p>As we know,</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Oracle owns the Java and JavaScript trademarks from its purchase of Sun.</p>
</li>
<li><p>Java and JavaScript are 2 completely unrelated programming languages.</p>
</li>
<li><p>JSON is the abbreviation of &quot;JavaScript Object Notation&quot;, and is a popular format for encoding structured data.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Can Oracle sue JSON users?</p>
<ul>
<li>user of parsing softwares,</li>
<li>and developers of parsers and encoders, and</li>
<li>ECMA, who publishes the <a href="https://www.ecma-international.org/publications-and-standards/standards/ecma-404/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">JSON specification</a></li>
</ul>
<p>What can Oracle possibly win (and JSON users possibly lose) in such litigation?</p>

<p>I don't think so. While JSON <em>stands for</em> &quot;JavaScript Object Notation&quot;, it doesn't <em>say</em> that. So the term &quot;JSON&quot; isn't infringing on a trademark for &quot;JavaScript&quot;.</p>
<p>To sue somebody because of an alleged trademark infringement, one needs to prove that the offender abused a trade name of the suing company in a way to make the public believe the offending company was related to the suing company. Nobody is even trying that by just using a file format. The file structure itself was developed as an open standard, so they can't claim any rights on that.</p>
<p>I have not heard about a company claiming rights in file structures recently, because the data is considered the property of the user, not of the company that wrote the program it was created with. And users are often no longer accepting file formats that can only be read by a specific (expensive) application from a particular company. They want to be flexible to change their vendor and keep the data.</p>

trademark