Software license conditioned on company size or revenue
<p>A software license might be different if the company where the software is being used is larger or smaller. So if Joey is an independent freelance contractor with his own company with revenue less than the limit and working for the giant multinational billion dollar revenue company, is it the smaller or the larger revenue that counts towards the licensing? Typical examples are Docker and Unity, where license and cost depends on where the usage is.</p>

<p>This will depend first and foremost on the terms of the license. There appears to be no direct violation of a law - businesses have great freedom to set prices. For some special goods like food, governments may have price controls that limit tis freedom, but software licenses are generally not is such categories.</p>
<p>The most common exception to this would probably be <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing" rel="nofollow noreferrer">(F)RAND licensing</a> - (fair, )  reasonable, and <strong>non-discriminatory</strong>. This is typically not a direct legal restriction, but one that follows from common technical standards processes such as ISO. Companies that submit patented technologies for standardization commonly agree to non-discriminatory pricing</p>

software licensing