Manipulating Images for Promotion &amp; Potentially Profit
<p>Based in UK.</p>
<p>I am a graphic designer and during lockdown have been practicing my photoshop skills by digitally manipulating images of some local 'celebrities'.</p>
<p>The digital manipulations mostly involve adding tattoos to the person, changing their skin and appearance dramatically but the person is still recognisable.</p>
<p>Having shown these image manipulations to some friends they have suggested I setup an Instagram to promote my skills, and potentially take on paid requests and / or sell my existing work.</p>
<p>This is just a hobby so I would rather not get sued! I'm not sure if I need to contact the person in the image directly, or the owner of the image, not even sure how to find that out.</p>
<p><a href="https://blog.printsome.com/printing-fan-art/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">I've read that</a> as long as I make it clear that the image is not official or linked to the person it should be ok. Also if the image is a parody or a criticism, or something that is highly transformative, that's also ok. Would my image manipulations fall within this category?</p>
<p>My questions are, what steps must I take in order to ensure the following is all legal;</p>
<ul>
<li>setup an Instagram and post my photoshop work</li>
<li>accept commissions / requests and send this image back to a customer in digital format</li>
<li>sell my existing work</li>
</ul>
<p>Any advice would be appreciated!</p>

<p>There are several legal issues regarding this kind of image manipulation.</p>
<h2>Copyright</h2>
<p>The first is Copyright. From the description, the modified images are <em>derivative works</em>. Making or distributing derivative works requires the permission of the holder of the copyright on the original (source) work. Some open source licenses (such as the Creative Commons licenses that do not include an ND clause) grant such permission in advance. Otherwise permission must be requested from, and granted by, the copyright holder or the holder's agent.</p>
<p>In the absence of permission this is copyright infringement. If advertised widely for a fee, a copyright suit is more likely, and might result in sizable damages. The holder might not grant permission, or might charge a fee. A lack of any answer from the holder must be treated as a &quot;no&quot;.</p>
<h2>Right of Publicity</h2>
<p>In some jurisdictions a person has a &quot;right of publicity&quot; in his or her own image or likeness. This generally means that photos or images of the person cannot be used commercially without permission from the subject. In some places this right is limited to the use of such images in advertising, not as art subjects themselves.</p>
<p>I don't know the extent of such rights in England and Wales, or elsewhere in the UK. In the US this varies by state. But if such rights apply, use of such images without permission can result in a suit and significant damages.</p>
<h2>Defamation</h2>
<p>If showing an image of a person with added tattoos would tend to bring that person into disrepute, or make others think badly of that person, for example if the added tattoos were Nazi or gang symbols, then distributing such an altered image <strong>might</strong> be defamation. This would only apply if people actually thoguht the tattoos indicated that person's choice or attitude, or if reasonable people might think so.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Before making this a business, even a hobby business, one would do well to consult a lawyer with IP expertise. There are significant legal risks here, which are increased by doing this for profit, and advertising it on the net. It might well be that in many cases appropriate permissions can be obtained free or cheaply, but it is not safe to assume this.</p>

copyright united-kingdom intellectual-property ownership