Questions regarding legal aspects of John Oliver&#39;s debt forgiveness giveaway
<p>John Oliver made news a few months ago by purchasing nearly $15 million in outstanding medical bill debt for $60,000 -- less than a penny on the dollar.</p>

<p>But, I read that cancellation-of-debt ("COD") is <a href="https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc431.html" rel="noreferrer">taxable income</a>.  How Oliver got around this ("...no tax consequences whatsoever...") seems odd...</p>

<p>Oliver set up a dummy corporation ("<a href="http://www.centralassetrecoveryprofessionals.com/" rel="noreferrer">CARP</a>") and then as CEO of CARP, he negotiated the debt purchase (presumably from some other collection agency).</p>

<p>But, rather than forgive the debt directly, CARP turned around and <em>donated</em> the debt to <a href="https://www.ripmedicaldebt.org/" rel="noreferrer">RIP</a>, a charitable organization.</p>

<p>Am I to understand that this second transfer was <em>necessary</em> in order to <strong>explicitly avoid</strong> the tax consequence of COD?  I do understand that <a href="http://www.natlawreview.com/article/tax-consequences-john-oliver-s-15-million-medical-debt-forgiveness" rel="noreferrer">COD is taxable income</a>, but "gifts" are not.</p>

<p>CARP is a simple <a href="http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/form-llc-how-to-organize-llc-30287.html" rel="noreferrer">$50 setup-fee LLC</a> (and presumably <em>not</em> a charitable organization), whereas RIP was/is an established <a href="https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/exemption-requirements-section-501-c-3-organizations" rel="noreferrer">501(c)(3)</a> charity.</p>

<p>I'm assuming that Once CARP purchased the debt, it then had rights of ownership with respect to debt collection, i.e. it could (1) continue pursuing collections from the debtors, (2) do nothing with the debt, (3) forgive the debts individually or <em>en masse</em>, or (4) donate it to a charity (which is what it did).  After CARP gave (donated) the debt to RIP, then RIP was free to forgive the debts (which is its <a href="https://www.ripmedicaldebt.org/how-it-works/" rel="noreferrer">explicitly-stated mission</a>).</p>

<p>Had CARP pursued option (3) above, then does that mean all that forgiven debt was/is taxable income as COD?</p>

<p><strong>ADDENDUM:</strong></p>

<p>I just now realized that, in a theoretical situation where CARP chose option (1) -- attempt to collect on the debt.  Pretending that CARP successfully collected e.g. $1 million, is this simply money that CARP can keep?  (Subject to corporate income tax, of course.)</p>

<p>I'm also assuming that "purchasing" debt gives the purchaser rights of ownership such that any collected money from a debtor cannot be further claimed by previous creditors.  Is this indeed the case?</p>

<p>Oliver or his shell corporation could have directly forgiven the debt as a gift to the debtors. As a gift, it would not have to be reported as income, <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p4681.pdf" rel="nofollow">according to the IRS</a>. In that case, he would need to file <a href="https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i709/ch01.html#d0e256" rel="nofollow">Form 709</a> and he would have to pay federal gift tax. There is an annual exclusion of $14,000 per donee, which probably is a drop in the bucket. It may not be required to pay tax on gifts to a 501(c)(3) organization, since the gift-bump is offset by the associated charitable gift deduction. The charity can then forgive the debt as a gift (and as tax-exempt, would not have to pay gift tax). In that sense, the second transfer was necessary, although it would not have been if RIP had directly obtained the debt (or if CARP were a 503(c)(3)).</p>

united-states tax-law non-profit