Can I walk into a store and return non-tampered, non-expired, non-opened food directly to the shelf?
<p>Say for the sake of argument that I have some old shrink-wrapped spaghetti packets lying around, and I'm not a huge fan of the brand. I'd like to get rid of the spaghetti somehow, but I don't want to throw it away (what a waste of food!), and I don't have a good place to put it, or a nearby food pantry willing to accept it.</p>
<p>Also assume that the food is not expired, that I have not tampered with it, that it is in good condition, and that it is roughly equivalent quality to the stuff on the shelf, bar age. Also assume I have documented its storage thoroughly, as one naturally does with one's pantry. If anyone were to get sick from eating this food, it is extremely implausible that it is my fault. Spaghetti is a dry good and I have handled it well.</p>
<p>Suppose I were to take the spaghetti into a store, non-disruptively place it on the shelf alongside an equivalent product that is still being manufactured, and leave. Have <em>I personally</em> violated a law? If so, what crime have I committed?</p>
<p>In principle, only the store stands to benefit from this exchange. I've given them back a product that they can sell a second time - it's a paltry sum, but it's certainly not costing them anything atypical. They might not be especially thrilled about my actions, but in this hypothetical I am the kind of person who would return purchased produce directly to a grocery store, so let's assume I don't care too much about that.</p>
<hr />
<p>I do also feel the need to state I would not actually do this, and I don't at all condone it. I'm asking this question out of curiosity for how a public health situation like this would be managed legally (and in practice).</p>

<blockquote>
<p>Have I personally violated a law? If so, what crime have I committed?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You may or may not have committed a crime. Some possible crimes are (1) stocking a grocery store without a public health license, (2) littering/dumping of things on private property without permission, and (3) making a non-verbal hoax threat.</p>
<p>You have also almost definitely committed the tort of trespass, by leaving something on the property of another without their permission.</p>
<p>You might also have committed a tortious interference with business opportunity tort.</p>
<p>Also, while we usually think of a gift as a unilateral thing, the law conceives of a gift as something that requires the assent of both the donor and the donee to be effective.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In principle, only the store stands to benefit from this exchange.
I've given them back a product that they can sell a second time - it's
a paltry sum, but it's certainly not costing them anything atypical.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is probably not true.</p>
<p>The store is quite likely to incur substantial costs from your action, if it is discovered, because even though it is actually untampered with food, the store doesn't know that and can't prove that. It would have to throw away the food if it discovered it, and if it can't distinguish the returned food from the existing inventory it would probably have to destroy all of it, because it isn't good enough that food is not tampered with, the store needs to know what it is untampered with to lawfully sell it.</p>
<p>Short of that, it would at a minimum, screw up their inventory accounting and that would be much more expensive to resolve than any gain that they receive from the transaction.</p>

united-states food