Conflict of Laws: Single Jurisdiction
<p>I have attempted to learn what I can (IANAL) from reading the article: <a href="https://www.upcounsel.com/conflict-of-laws-principles" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Conflict of Laws Principles</a>: Everything You Need to Know.</p>

<p>The article indicates multiple (2+ jurisdictions).</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Conflict of laws signifies the difference between the laws of two or
  more jurisdictions that are applicable to a dispute in question. that
  are applicable to a dispute in question.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>If there are two conflicting state laws of the same jurisdiction (for example both in Florida):</p>

<ul>
<li>is nomenclature different (i.e. not "Conflict of Laws" and is labeled "XYZ")</li>
<li>are the principles for determining which law applies the same with said Florida example</li>
</ul>

<p>A good answer would walk through the thought process of the example provided at: <a href="https://law.stackexchange.com/q/51901/20892">HOA meetings transcripts</a></p>

<p>"Conflict of Laws" refers only to competing jurisdictional issues, not laws within a single jurisdiction which appear to "conflict" with each other. </p>

<p>Competing jurisdictional issues arise where more than one jurisdiction applies. A good example is where a party resides in one state, but the subject matter of the lawsuit occurred in another state. How to decide the issue is a matter of continuing legal evolution. Your article is generally accurate as far as it goes, but there's many pages of legal opinion written as to what constitutes a procedural vs. a substantive matter.</p>

<p>With regard to different laws of a single jurisdiction, deciding which law applies is called "litigation." I'm trying to be funny, but I'm not joking. Legal and factual research combine to persuade a judge that the law more favorable to you is the one that should be applied.</p>

conflict-of-laws