Jean Louis

Let's be kind each other, welcoming, you can solve your issues privately

For both matters innovation and good example coming from great country of China.

Let's say this way, there is article, but no good reasoning in that article. It is talking about intuition without even defining it. And it talks zero of the fundamental principle of existence which is "survive". Maybe you could research what is the goal of mind: https://www.dianetics.org/videos/audio-book-excerpts/the-goal-of-man.html

Instinctive knowing is native to living beings only.

The new anthropomorphism of intuition given to computer doesn't make it so, just by writing an article.

Human mind wants to survive, and not only for oneself, but to survive as family, as group, as mankind, as all living beings, as planet. Some people are aware that planet must survive, like Musk, so he builds rockets for Mars, while other people can't understand why. Though the better survival level we seek, the better we do over long term.

Computer doesn't want to survive, it is tool like a hammer. It has no intuition, it has no survival, thus has no instincts.

You can of course try to build data and try to ask computer to act upon such data, which in general, majority of models already do. They are giving probabilistic computations, but know nothing about it. Intuition is human and description of it has been already built in into the LLMs. If you wish to improve it, you are welcome.

However, I don't see anything revolutionary here.

LLM is reflection or mimicry of human knowledge.

If you give it some operational capacities such as to move around, to target people in the war, to control the house and business, it is going to do by the data it has been given, and it will do disaster randomly, just as it gives random nonsensical results from time to time.

Gemma License (danger) is not Free Software and is not Open Source:
https://gnu.support/gnu-emacs/emacs-lisp/Gemma-License-danger-is-not-Free-Software-and-is-not-Open-Source.html

Let's not forget the meaning of Free Software models like DeepSeek and Qwen, Mistral, and that Gemma is proprietary, Freeware, but not Open Source

I have a Dmenu script to switch between the models. https://gitea.com/gnusupport/LLM-Helpers/src/branch/main/bin/rcd-llm-dmenu-launher.sh

I just click and then choose the model from the menu.

You mentioned switching modes and switching model. Now, what do you mean with switching the modes?

And finally, you can just talk to your model and ask it to give you the shell script or any other kind of programming code to help you switch the mode.

The important is that you have defined how to run the model by some command, and then you can put all those commands together in a list, and then you find a way how to switch modes.

I like speaking, even now I'm speaking and getting this comment in text. So that means I could basically speak and have my computer intercept the speech before it comes to any model. And then I can use embeddings to basically recognize if I have given some command. You can even use the simple script recognition. Like you could use string recognition. And then based on your spoken command or maybe the text which you are entering, then you could switch the mode or switch the model.

I have tried with a small data set and it never finished the training. It took really, really long time. I don't know how long. Maybe one hour. I don't know. I was just watching how it is in the stage one, but it was very, very long time.

I have just tried it and it could not read the map. It is very inaccurate with words which are clearly digitally written on the map. There are many different use cases for your use case. It is good for mine, it's not.

The big difference between Google Gemma and Qwen models is that Google is not open source, it's not free software, while Qwen is truly free software, free as in freedom.

Comparing those models from quite different categories is not right.

Gwen is not limiting commercial users, not even largest companies or governments, while Google does.

Comparison makes no sense.