feat_id
stringlengths 16
16
| text
stringlengths 1
5k
| target
stringclasses 2
values | evaluation_predictions
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|
0cb9bdcf48b10ee4 | ]] is the term that first comes to mind. | 0 | [
2,
0,
22113,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
b64ded4501cc95e3 | == vandalism ==
You have been warned before: stop vandalising. This is your last warning. | 0 | [
2,
0,
3762,
2141,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
dab7d5f16c6d929e | :I have requested semi-protection of this article, as all the spam links to VA's are being added by unregistered users, with at least one a week being added and it is becoming tiresome removing them. Please do NOT add your VA links to this article! I am trying to increase the quality of this article, and adding these links does not help. | 0 | [
2,
0,
3438,
11790,
5678,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
89ca45f4983ba79e | "==Chateau Montebello==
added note regarding HL Furst's letter to Saddlemire
:No worries. Don't mean to discourage your edits. The principle at Wikipedia is that other editors can verify the sources whether it be online or via a trip to the library. That works fine for secondary sources, but primary sources are a bit of a problem, because there is usually one copy and it is difficult to verify. There must be a solution. Let me give it a bit of thought, and I will get back to you. Regards.
thanks - I can always upload the original letter. HL Furst's employement there is document in several books on the Chateau but the letter is something that only our family or Saddlemire would have had.
::You should upload it over at Wikimedia Commons, and make sure to categorize it in the Chateau Montebello category. I'm not sure that the letter is the sort of media we'd use here at Wikipedia, but it is appropriate content to be uploaded to the Commons media repository. Then you can source the paragraphs in question to that file. Make sure to add the license tag to the image when you upload it. Any other questions, feel free to ask.
==100th Regiment of Foot==
added picture from Archives Canada
== Dental implant ==
I'm guessing this edit was a mistake? My edit removed the advertisement, and you reverted it - restoring the advertisement. But your edit summary gives the reason ""obvious advertising"", which seems contrary to your edit. I can only assume that the edit was either in error; or you were commenting that you were adding an obvious advertisement. As I prefer to AGF, I'm assuming the first is the case and it was a mistake.
Regardless, I've re-removed the advert, so the article is cleaned up now. - • -
My error thx.
== Thanks ==
for downloading that period map of the War of 1812 to Commons(:File:KENSETT MAP CANADA 1812.jpg) and then placing it in the War of 1812 article. What a great addition! I wish I knew how to 'cut out' a subset of an image so it could be used to illustrate specific articles, like any of the articles associated with River Raisin events. I think it would be interesting to have a period map give an overview of an area for some of the associated articles. (I also noticed that the Kensett map spelled the River's name as ""Razen""!) Cheers,
:happy to do it for you. Let me know they area you'd like; the copyright is expired so we can use part of the map and I've got the original so it can be a photo of just that area.
::I think it would be useful to have close-ups of many of the various areas of interest - so much of the War seems to be a mystery to most people. It doesn't seem to have the 'cachet' to American readers especially, of other more well-known/more heavily-illustrated conflicts, such as the American Civil War or the American Revolutionary War.
::If I am able to put an 'order' in, it would be wonderful to have close-ups available of the Detroit/River 'Razen' area to possibly illustrate associated articles such as Battle of Frenchtown, Benjamin Franklin Graves, Nathaniel G. S. Hart, River Raisin National Battlefield Park, etc. Cheers,
==Disambiguation link notification for December 29==
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited JCDA (Journal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages | 0 | [
2,
0,
20328,
282,
75,
173,
13,
162,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
57c33c337e614f79 | School for Scoundrels (2006 film) | 0 | [
2,
0,
22113,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
742bf5b4baf0e356 | "
: If you think that's bad, BracketBot, try making a syntax error in C++ using the STL library and missing a const declaration - it'll drive you nuts. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
113,
1437,
7915,
4832,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
00daceec23dfcf6d | I refuse to be bullied. Sorry. Where did Masem and Jacobite break down my edits again? A conspiracy againt me? I was merely commenting on their behaviour, I reached out to Fluff because he seems helpful, more experienced as an admin, and went through the same thing with you. | 0 | [
2,
0,
40028,
4122,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
a4526784c06bcc62 | Definitely, I thinkk that everybody should be able to learn all about bad things like this. We all should be prepared for the rough breaks in life. -Krista- | 0 | [
2,
0,
19065,
1040,
328,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
ed85d6352dd7fe59 | REDIRECT Talk:1963–64 in English football | 0 | [
2,
0,
15622,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
b98a108ed62481b8 | "
::I'm actually not opposed to to the article saying that the TPM is ""often cited"" as being grassroots. That's completely true, and easily sourced. I'm opposed to this being said without the full context of it also being cited as not grassroots at all, and even as being astroturf. But none of this fits comfortably in the lead. I've filled scratch pads with different formulations, and each one seemed to have some way it could be misread (however unintentionally) to either come across as biased or false. The article should definitely cover all of the above, fairly and neutrally. But the lead should either have a balanced mention or none at all, and I just don't see any way to pull off the former.
::I'm not hostile towards some of the other attempts at compromise, but they fall into the same trap. For example, we simply can't say it's ""largely"" grassroots because that's not what our sources say. Some say it is grassroots, some say it isn't. Averaging the two to ""largely"" is the worst sort of synthesis. I believe I compared it to saying that Ricky Martin was ""largely straight"", when in fact no source made any such claim, and all sources would disagree with it in one direction or another. Even if we found some sources that said ""largely grassroots"", this would not allow us favor it and ignore the ""is"" and ""isn't"" sides. This is advanced synthesis, beyond what we are permitted.
::So, in short, no, I can't accept such a formulation. And I do believe it is worth fighting to keep such a controversial claim from being stated as factual in the lead. Maybe I'm Don Quixote, maybe I'm a Tank, or maybe I'm just a dick, but that's my conclusion. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
64,
75,
3264,
10,
4456,
2026,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
56902f9d41d0696c | fuck y'all all of yall | 0 | [
2,
0,
25496,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
cbcdad0e4247ca0c | It's not Plagarism, just stop being a jerk-off about it. | 1 | [
2,
0,
22174,
145,
10,
35786,
12,
1529,
59,
24,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
f4f9400bf080dc05 | "
:That's certainly the way trademarks work, but there's always some interpretation involved - for instance, [I think] the browser now known as Firefox was said to be infringing the trademark of a BIOS maker because they were called ""Phoenix"" and had a product called a ""browser""; I'm not sure what it was, but it certainly wasn't a web browser. - " | 0 | [
2,
0,
11329,
12807,
24,
21,
10,
3748,
11407,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
5ce505a7d6ff2404 | ghxfghkkomfrkijhktmh njthynthnkthnkdfhjdkgjhkhj hjkhjkfhjkrtuirthjk fhjfhn jkh | 0 | [
2,
0,
4147,
13568,
4147,
42763,
1075,
12997,
330,
39908,
298,
330,
15561,
298,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
b42239da4aae39a2 | "
:I have to agree with you on that one. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
2854,
19,
47,
15,
14,
65,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
17a13a7aaa3a400f | :I agree. It would be a lot more useful to have a list of proposed sound correspondences. And yes also reconstructions instead of word pairs.· | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
2854,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
158fe1f2d2071ea4 | ::::Why only women ? Because it almost exclusively women who worry about faded curtains. | 0 | [
2,
0,
22113,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
e2a1868bb7060d37 | "
::::OFGS: it was rumoured that I had a secret admin account years ago and the Arbcom stupidly checked it out; it's one of those lovely, mythical stories that are attached to every Wikipedian ne'er do well. Presumable we all rise from Atlantis disguised as the Monster of Glamis to edit. Do you really think the Arbcom would have been that stupid? " | 0 | [
2,
0,
113,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
b34cd5967daa1d2b | "
::I do not disagree with the ""testy"" attribution I have earned. ) However we have a character out in the wild who knows nothing of the culture and thinks that saturating the talk page with transparent protests is going to affect change. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
109,
45,
11967,
19,
5,
41039,
21959,
219,
48149,
42066,
38,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
a4da51eb47b72cd8 | "
== Congrats for ""your"" day! ==
Hello LadyofShalott. Congratulations for having now your day. It must feel good!
Well, since you have been so nice and kind, I couldn´t refrain myself from not asking you for advice. I have been involved in a hard discussion regarding an historical issue. It has to do with the monopolization of a serious of related articles by one editor. basicaly, this editor insists in considering an resistance monarchic movement (Chetniks) and its leader (Draža Mihailović) a Nazy collaborator. The movement fought the Germans, but also the Tito´s Partisans (another resistance group). Since the second ones won the war, Tito condemned and executed Mihailovic, charging him on treason. USA organised an post-mortum trial and freed the movement of the charges, and condecorated Mihailovic. France too. Since the movement fought both, the Germans and the Partisans, some detachments ocasionally collaborated, but it was maynly a three side war. Anyway, this user, Direktor, manipulating and exageratins sources that talk about that ocasional collaboration, wants to impose that the entire movement and Mihailovic are to be considered ""notable collaborators"", and its role as resistance efforts ignored. Well, despite WP:AGF, this user as a Croat and assumed Titoist, Tito was the leader of the Partisans, a communist guerilla, obviously has no nice feelings towards a Serb monarchic movement, and edited the article having in mind only his POV. The worst is that when other editors want to edit the articles, he is very agressive and reverts all that doesn´t fit his ideology. He was blocked several times for breaking the 3r role. I demanded that the article includes more NPOV, so a discussion started. Another editor that also agrees with me already asked for mediation, so wi will see what will happend. A nazy collaboration accusation is a too serious accusation to be left unsourced. Anyway, my problem is regarding this users attitude towards me. He constantly manipulates my words (same way as he does with the sources) and does all the possible and impossible so his version will prevail. He unfairlly accused me of many things, but when talking about me or my edits he used the following expressions: Lack of knolledge/info (7times), Nonsence (5 times), Horrible/faulty grammar (5 times), Me having no idea whatsoever (3 times), childish (2 times), Lying (2 times), Me being nationalist (2 times), unnencyclopedic (2 times), Absurd (2 times), Stupid (1 time), Clumsy (1 time), Silly (1 time), Ridiculous (2 times), Slauderous (1 time), My opinion irrelevant (1 time), me joking (1 time), Missinformed (1 time), Utterly flawed ideas (1 time) and many more indirectly tageting me. When I asked him please to be polite and avoid using this expressions, he accused me of imagining provocation. He also constantly speaks as he is a ""community"". The discussion is found here: Talk:Draža Mihailović. Should I report him for this behaviour?
P.S.:I am really sorry for my long comment, and for involving youm but since you are an admin, and a excellent wikipedian, I needed to ask you if I am obligated to tolerate this kind of language? " | 0 | [
2,
0,
10836,
75,
2067,
7,
1166,
42,
1040,
328,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
c0e276d1e34baad3 | "FYI, I chose ""tuner"" for lack of a better word coming to mind. Cosworth started with Ford blocks, so they owe the same relationship Repco does to Buick. If you've a better word? " | 0 | [
2,
0,
11013,
5985,
1954,
7351,
1758,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
609cf6bc8e6e3307 | Addendum: O hey, now I'm a real user. | 0 | [
2,
0,
22113,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
16a57e4e1dfd393f | "
::::Your first quotation does not support either of the two disptuted statements (""Canada has been a monarchy since 1534"" and ""there have been 33 sovereigns of Canada""). While I might dispute that the office of the monarch is the oldest continuous and unbroken institution in Canada—could not it be the Catholic Church?—the second quotation says nothing about 1534 or 33 sovereigns. All it says is that the Crownas an institution has existed in Canada since before 1867, a point not in dispute. Third quotation is not from a reliable source, which is a good thing, since it's baloney. The Canadian Crown has nothing in it of the old French crown and the claims made by the French which were transferred to the English in 1763 could just as well have been made and transferred by a republic as by the French monarchy. The 1583 date seems to contradict our assertion that 1497 is the important one.
::::The statement that ""32 French and British kings and queens have reigned over Canada"" is not the same as ""there have been 33 sovereigns of Canada"". The term ""sovereign of"" has different implications from ""reigned over"". The Canadian Encyclopedia's statement is not objectionable. I don't think royal.gov.uk is a reliable source for reasons already stated, but its statement seems to trade on ambiguity—not to mention that it is in conflict with the dates of 1497 and 1583 for the start of British monarchical rule. The ambiguity is in the word ""monarchy"", which could mean a type or system of government, or could mean a country with a monarch as its head of state. Canada (as this article understands it) was not such a country prior to 1867, but the French and British colonies (there were several) were always under a monarchical form of government (with the exception of Cromwell's time).
::::""There may have been two lines before 1763, but its evident neither of those two is considered apart from the present one."" You can't consider them apart, because what is Canada now (and what was Canada in 1867) was divided between them in the 16th–18th centuries. It is silly to treat these monarchs, often at war with one another, as being a single monarchy, as this article does. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
218,
75,
206,
5754,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
c3b5c804530a9e8a | ***Not really, while general Gundam show feature such distinct feature. There are some product that standout from other. (Turn A Gundam for example, and some product like Rise from Ashes game not include Gundam at all. And there are some novel that doesn't has official merchandise release at all.) | 0 | [
2,
0,
7199,
269,
7586,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
fcab7b0bccee1355 | Hello, I'll find a reference to your addition as Wikipedia rules required. Are you a grandchild of Canon Blackmore, once rector? If so, our families were very good friends in the 1950s. Blessings, Brian McLean [email protected]. (Please erase this when read, for spamming reasons, and get in touch.) | 0 | [
2,
0,
2522,
1232,
58,
182,
205,
964,
11,
5,
9323,
29,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
1f3ae68d0e98e557 | *Please stop screwing around; other people have to clean up after you. Otherwise, I'll have to block this IP from editing. | 0 | [
2,
0,
3226,
6715,
912,
21927,
154,
198,
131,
97,
82,
33,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
d5f8dbc8d5a2138f | "
::Hey don't worry about it, there's all manner of silliness on party names here (check out ""Communist League""!). Hope to see you around more pages " | 0 | [
2,
0,
41083,
9,
38052,
6601,
15,
537,
2523,
259,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
eabc1dd1011152bc | "
::::Are you crazy? I pointed out FA class articles above and you are saying they are shit? And you still haven't explained why you are saying that it is not an actual film. Do you think its a street play or something? Please explain your reasonings for believing it as such. — · [ ] " | 0 | [
2,
0,
13755,
47,
5373,
116,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
1fb82741e1e3a0aa | Ann Coulter is a Nazi. | 0 | [
2,
0,
3762,
2141,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
06d99d70424fb9fe | "
== ""Partial virtualization"" ==
I've added a category of ""partial virtualization"" between ""full virtualization"" and ""paravirtualization"". Although this may not sit well with everybody, I think we need a category for a system like IBM M44/44X – with virtual machines and multiple address spaces, but not full hardware simulation and the ability to boot multiple operating systems. There is a fuzzy line between such a system and any OS that provides address space isolation. Or rather there really is no such line, and all such operating systems could be considered in the same category. We wouldn't tend to view them as virtual machine systems today, but they were a huge step forward from earlier approaches to multitasking. Please feel free to butcher my addition if you see a better way to deal with this. I don't think we want to rewrite history based on today's categories however. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
206,
52,
240,
10,
4120,
13,
10,
467,
101,
38552,
256,
3305,
73,
3305,
1000,
2,
1
] |
d2e68afb9b14545d | Personally, I don't think you have to be a racist to not beleive in interracial relationships. It's sad how there is so little wiggle room for acceptable personal beliefs these days. The left pushes hard and if you don't comply, you're a bigot or a racist or an antisemite or whatever you are. Stupid. | 1 | [
2,
0,
7199,
13,
961,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
fa715c3713b93a3c | == Implications in edits ==
I don't see any of the implications you seem to have seen in the removal of the territories in question from the National GDP list, not any part of the article. They seem to just have been removed from a national GDP list as they don't have 'national' GDPs, per se. Was there a reason to mention anything else other than your first and final sentences? I'm not asking this as an attack or anything, just trying to see the approach from your point of view. From mine, it seemed a surprising lack of good faith combined with exaggerating the situation, but again, I'm sure that's not what you meant to imply. | 0 | [
2,
0,
26402,
3340,
15494,
154,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
bb54a314d70ca084 | "
:Mebibytes per second is a measurement of bandwidth, and a very limited one these days. It's difficult to impossible to measure CPU performance in ""bytes per second"" because it does not simply transmit and receive data. Some traditional benchmarks have been MIPS and FLOPS, though these too are very limited metrics when you consider the high amount of TLP, ILP, and vector capabilities in a modern ""general purpose"" processor. 03:06, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)" | 0 | [
2,
0,
448,
3209,
1452,
219,
12782,
32,
10,
20104,
9,
27113,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
389bdabafaf93a9e | Your vandalism at Stupidity has earned you a 36-hour block. What a way to go out. You are, of course, welcome to contribute constructively when the block expires. — : Leave a — | 1 | [
2,
0,
250,
2491,
12,
16928,
1803,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
e3221525ead7d2f1 | ==RC patrol fallout==
Oral and Anthony fan? What a loser. (unsigned comment from )
:No, just not a fan of vandalism. Unlike you, apparently. | 0 | [
2,
0,
11329,
12807,
24,
21,
34308,
8,
3173,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
b02b9b02b20585f8 | "
== Elizabeth Home ==
Greetings! I'm looking over your DYK submission. I have JSTOR access, so I'm able to read both Lewis and Pocock & Cook. Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anything in either source for James Lawes being ""the richest,"" although we certainly have support for ""most eligible.""— " | 0 | [
2,
0,
11329,
12807,
38,
21,
2600,
10,
1040,
19,
10,
8707,
116,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
bf8f29e8dda1f194 | "
:As long as you consider the province Ulster identical to Northern Ireland, there is indeed little to discuss. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
25101,
410,
7,
2268,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
7c95da2ef0e5ba4e | == Q. wat is 82.6.126.56? ==
A. a smelly little rat from cardiff who has nothing better to do than vandalise swanseas wiki page probably cos he dont hav a job or cudnt get one cos he has a criminal record for nicking dustcaps cos he so poor. COME ON LECEISTER! D | 0 | [
2,
0,
495,
2688,
487,
108,
565,
289,
17167,
975,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
483a6e792ed1b098 | :::::::: Latuff should be by and large inadmissible given his hyper-partisan position (the most euphemistic description I can give for the nature of his cartoons). His work also, by and large, does not appear to be published in WP:Reliable sources so this may fall under WP:SPS. And we also have no idea if even the hospital bed cartoon does anything to reflect the reality of the situation. | 0 | [
2,
0,
26402,
3340,
15494,
154,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
bdfd74cbc733684f | ;Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Portuguese; did you know there is a Portuguese Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page.
;Bem-vindo(a)!
Olá, , bem-vindo(a) à Wikipédia! Apesar de esforços para melhorar a Wikipédia serem sempre bem recebidos, infelizmente suas contribuições não foram escritas em um nível de inglês bom o suficiente para ser útil. Você parece ser mais familiarizado com o Português; sabia que existe uma Wikipédia em português? Talvez você prefira contribuir lá em vez de aqui. De qualquer forma, bem-vindo(a) ao projeto e obrigado(a) por seus esforços! Se precisar de ajuda, por favor, sinta-se livre para me comunicar em minha página de discussão. | 0 | [
2,
0,
31842,
3194,
2540,
328,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
8d3be1b4b0078113 | ::::::There is no debate. Simply another set of eyes. La mome, I'd just read the section you've added above in the books and realised it should be added, so that's the next piece of the history section which then leads into the part about starting IBNA in the early 1970s which might (?) go in the parent article?
::::::ObserverNy: I don't mind the edits, and thanks assuming good faith that I've verified material before adding, the problem with your edit is that it separates some major points that are presented differently in the sources. We really should adhere to the sources. If I were to make it a direct quotation instead of a paraphrase then it would have to be written in the manner it is now chronologically. | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
218,
75,
1508,
5,
17668,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
c7172b908b8e17da | :::::::::I've never edited the article or said anything on-wiki about it. I think that probably is adequate distancing. | 0 | [
2,
0,
26402,
3340,
15494,
154,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
b026dc2c15ef9a3f | ==Ezra==
I'm walking a few for a few weeks, in total fustration. What kills me is what we are all on the same page, but she just has to be a fuckhead about it. So much better to befriend and work with people, but my impression is that thats not a possibility. So we are to be banished though a mixture of lies and solpcptism. Sad really. | 0 | [
2,
0,
495,
2533,
3844,
110,
418,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
8b084123d661f534 | == Racist stuff and possible sock ==
FILWISE stop adding oudated racist stuf to article. And 112.201.242.217's contributions mirrors your, are you using it as sock? | 0 | [
2,
0,
7199,
634,
24,
25,
37390,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
fc4f40bcc0656925 | Actually, Daisenshu Magazine stated that the tail is a recessive trait in half-saiyan hybrids. Hence why only one Saiyan baby had one from point of birth.
4:15 PM, 14 Apirl 2013 | 0 | [
2,
0,
133,
7886,
9,
5,
512,
16,
23459,
2088,
328,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
8f23a7dff80f9a00 | "
== On with the Show tour ==
Thanks for pointing out that the capital T isn't suitable, and I agree. So I took the liberty of moving the page to lower-case tour to satisfy WP:AT's section on WP:NATURAL, since parentheses should only be used when ""natural disambiguation is not possible."" D| " | 0 | [
2,
0,
113,
38,
202,
2220,
75,
56,
10,
778,
7,
304,
42,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
24a07f9c8f02cd30 | , which is fucking awesome | 1 | [
2,
0,
5488,
16,
23523,
6344,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
3ec35de3cad23150 | ::Please specifically release the article under the GFDL license. | | 0 | [
2,
0,
38304,
6715,
800,
5,
1566,
223,
5,
32727,
26109,
4385,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
79e2dfa4dce7bd1a | "
::::You tried to explain what? That you're fabricating sources and misrepresenting them? That you introduced those same figures Vituzzu refers to as neo-fascist hyperbole? ""250,000 - 350,000"" was your edit. I happen to agree with the figures in Vituzzu's summary. Note the difference between ""190,000 - 250,000"", and your own
::::I also don't buy all this ""edited by respectable institutions"" nonsense you're peddling. That book was just plain published, its not a peer review publication. For years now on this article, both Yugoslav and Italian sources are not used without attribution of nationality for reasons of WP:THIRDPARTY and NPOV and have not been for years; they pretty much cancel each-other out. If you really need to introduce controversial claims here, than surely you can find a non-Italian/Yugoslav author who agrees with you.
::::To be clear, its fine using Yugoslav/Italian refs - to reference the Italian/Yugoslav point of view. As in ""Slovene historian XY holds there were 40,000 refugees"", or ""Italian author Corni states this or that"".. I can not, and will not, under any circumstances agree to base our lede on authors that belong to one side of this controversial international dispute. There are sources aplenty that belong to neither. Let us move on to Ballinger, probably the best source on this.
:::::Oh, and P.s. Silvio, I did not actually edit the article (added something, then removed it). And as for Djilas - your basic facts are accurate, but your text is again disgustingly biased and misrepresentative. Djilas was a Yugoslav dissident, an opponent of the Yugoslav government: that must be made clear, his statements (while certainly noteworthy) must be viewed as claims and be clearly attributed to him - not reported as facts. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
1899,
26875,
4125,
6082,
16,
5,
275,
7058,
1300,
15,
42,
4456,
758,
4464,
2,
1,
1,
1
] |
50daa0f481b23f2d | == Done here ==
I am retiring from Wikipedia. The bullshit with some style warriors editors who keep insisting to kick the bird editors in the ass because they think they have the moral highground to determine what is correct and what its not really makes this place a fucking mess. I have more to do in life that will ultimately add more to the world than dealing with style warriors. | 1 | [
2,
0,
14181,
7,
5,
477,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
8d0b6ee0cb24cef8 | why is this a 'coatrack', when no other explanation of the 4E′s is available on WP? (It used to be in Enaction (philosophy), but it was yanked there too, and now that article is slated for deletion.)
And | 0 | [
2,
0,
7608,
16,
42,
10,
128,
29582,
32865,
108,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
706e58434ee6c699 | ==Invitation-request to comment on ANI, Max v Floro & Floro v Max, for blocking==
Hi, may I please request you to submit some comment on myand 's twin petitions-complaints on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for blocking. Despite the long RFC, where Max lost, and was warned not to stalk me, since September 25, Max refused to stop stalking me and my edits. This is a sad day for Wikipedia. Cheers. | 0 | [
2,
0,
11329,
12807,
38,
21,
164,
7,
657,
42,
6,
53,
734,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
68da0f3e01eb436e | == Gaddafi is a fuckwit ==
Gaddafi is a fuckwit he deserves to fucking die. Everyone hates him! THe aritcle should reflect this! | 1 | [
2,
0,
11243,
27701,
123,
328,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
cdbd1b33027cad11 | "
::In fact, ""Lavitsky"" was a sleeper, from sometime last week, so you've got a point. In fact, it was suggested it's about time to request another checkuser, to see if we can trap any more ""sleepers"". If only I knew how to do that. ( '''' " | 0 | [
2,
0,
113,
1437,
36170,
113,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
cd32026d114f67d8 | "
== Wrong date on reference? ==
In the ""Response to Luxenberg"" section, the last sentence talks about a conference held in 2005. But the reference used (the conference abstracts) was it retrieved in 2002. I want to know if I can borrow the timemachine used to perfom this feat. (By the way, that link is dead now.) " | 0 | [
2,
0,
44142,
1657,
1248,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
9153c747fa4b4d6b | == BLP PROD removed ==
Hi, I removed the BLP PROD tag from Kendra Scott, as that tag only applies when the article was created after 18 March 2010. Please see WP:BLPPROD for more information, or feel free to drop me a line. If you still feel the article warrants deletion, please use one of the other methods. Thanks | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
2928,
5,
12413,
510,
4729,
7111,
6694,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
161320d87a43441f | Your changes to Wikipedia:Your first article
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! | 0 | [
2,
0,
12654,
3153,
1383,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
49750fd1dbc55b76 | ≈Get used to it, nerd.≈ | 0 | [
2,
0,
22113,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
ce497347286551c0 | "
:::*It is a rare journalist that ""get's"" anything about Wikipedia. However the user's posture of standing off from the mine face was a statement of alienation from what goes on, and probably must go on. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
38304,
3226,
243,
16,
10,
3159,
5226,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
31069767f28b6e59 | ::Thanks for your comment. I think I was able to be of some assistance. | 0 | [
2,
0,
15622,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
f74573f5e1211993 | ::didn't know countries can think! The problem is that there are different definitions of Central Europe. And we need to make this clear instead of fighting which is the one and only true definition. | 0 | [
2,
0,
38304,
399,
75,
216,
749,
64,
206,
328,
20,
936,
16,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
48b0f6b73a5401a5 | ==More tables==
We also need to compare CSS values and units (e.g. system color, system font) and colors. | 0 | [
2,
0,
9690,
9248,
27785,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
5494a135f4b09f44 | :::::So you have resorted to attacking my behavior instead of answering my questions about your neutrality issues? Is this all I can expect? Should I quit replying to you? | 0 | [
2,
0,
2847,
47,
33,
30538,
7,
6666,
127,
3650,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
5481d310eaa259a6 | Howexactly such a bot coudl ever get authorized, when it's code references a talk page and asks other editors to do something that the botdriver is not prepared to do themselves. it is a bad bot - in anyones' hands. | 0 | [
2,
0,
26954,
14084,
111,
11,
143,
6909,
108,
1420,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
12add1141f24f0de | "
OK, so I got the following from you ""Please read Wikipedia:No legal threats. Contributors making such threats are liable to be blocked from editing. If you chose to withdraw the threat (which will be necessary for this discussion to continue), please make any further postings at Talk:Sergey Brin as I have asked. This is not the appropriate place to discuss article content, and I will accordingly not respond to any more postings here. AndyTheGrump (talk) ""
-
so as you requested I do withdraw the legal threat (if you think it was one -I don't want to argue) - so, I understand your formal point, but there is also ""impression"" that the text provides and using information which is not true (and you probably have already understood that it is not true, though it is real quotation), so using such quotation may provide wrong understanding as a whole about institution? So, are there any special considerations why you think this particular quotation *which is misleading, despite it is indeed a quotaion of a person should be in the text? ...If you don'twant to discuss it with me, please consult me wether there is any other wikipedia authority (or moderators community) that can resolve this dispute among you and me? Again, I want to be as polite and friendly as possible (sorry if my English is not good enough to express it) and I am very much upset with your immidiate rely to strict measures (blocking from editing etc.), talking to me like a police to violater. Hope you will explain me your position or at least will give me appropriate consultation where to apply further. Thank you for your responce - it is very important to me ." | 0 | [
2,
0,
14287,
66,
13,
1030,
3455,
1437,
16506,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
10dea2627e8980a0 | :Advertising clutter is the term, then. It gives 230K hits in Google. | 0 | [
2,
0,
3762,
2141,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
468d35ce6d9d064a | The Lies of Modern Science ==
According to modern Professional Scientific Intellects:
* Science never searches for divisibility.
* Science never searches for comparability.
* Science never searches for connectivity.
* Science never searches for sensitivity.
* Science never searches for transformability.
* Science never searches for substitutability.
* Science never searches for satisfiability.
One should agree with these statements. Else, you would be branded as maniac! Am I right?
* Doesn't science search, find and teach you about divisibility of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn’t mathematics teach you that everything is perfectly divisible by unity?
* Doesn't science search, find and teach you about comparability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn’t science teach you the methods of comparing and contrasting things?
* Doesn't science search, find and teach you about connectivity of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Anything which cannot be connected to your mind cannot be thought.
* Doesn't science search, find and teach you about sensitivity of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? How can one assay the cause-effect if no thing has sensitivity?
* Doesn't science search, find and teach you about transformability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Hasn’t science taught transformations of energy, matter, equations, sentences?
* Doesn't science search, find and teach you about substitutability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? No computer can be at work if does not have searched for substitutability. What is going to be in the place of what is present now? What is evolution?
* Doesn't science search, find and teach you about the conditions which could be satisfied satisfiability) by atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities?
What would your knowledge be if no thing has divisibility, comparability, connectivity, sensitivity, transformability, substitutability and satisfiability?
== | 0 | [
2,
0,
20328,
282,
17,
27,
90,
173,
13,
162,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
9d6794a960c801af | :Thanks for letting me know. I see that IP is now blocked for three days. | 0 | [
2,
0,
6442,
4953,
13,
130,
360,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
b5c32ff543881c06 | You guys aren't that important. Hell, some of the fads you're claiming responsibility for the creation of, such as Fresh Prince lyrics, originate from 4chan. gtfo off my internets. | 0 | [
2,
0,
6766,
75,
109,
24,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
5d33050ed7ec4352 | Keep your anger and rudeness on your own talkpage
=== 3rr ===
You are lying. I do not have four reverts. Of course you couldn't show them to me, because it's untrue. You're going to report me? Are you going to tell my mommy too? How about me reporting you for making false accusations towards me? Oh yeah; that's right- I'm an adult. | 0 | [
2,
0,
1185,
32,
6480,
7,
162,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
c0fac4faf89eb235 | "Traditionally this type of meat, and where it's cut from, is informally referred to as ""cows' lips and assholes"". It's not really meat as we think of it, it's the last disgusting dregs of the remains of a smelly dead carcass. In its traditional processed form, we call it ""hot dogs"" and ""luncheon meats"". Ask anyone who works at a slaughterhouse.
" | 0 | [
2,
0,
405,
18,
5,
94,
21096,
385,
4950,
29,
9,
5,
1189,
9,
10,
5278,
10917,
1462,
26550,
2
] |
105f78c83cf3d634 | ::::The article isn't about oppression, but the allegations of oppression. An article on allegations of African oppression would include background info on similar allegations. This is background info, that you seem to oppose because of your POV. | 0 | [
2,
0,
133,
1566,
965,
75,
59,
22521,
6,
53,
5,
1857,
9,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
b8e6445c7ec8e0c0 | "
== Chinese step is quite different. ==
I just want to point out that I think Communist Chinese step is quite different from the so-called ""goose-step"" in USSR and Nazi Germany. The foot must be horizontal, instead of vertical, which makes the step much more difficult. In Chinese, it's called Standard Step(正步). " | 0 | [
2,
0,
5787,
10577,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
a339c44405ad6dec | "
::Let me just add that it's extremely poor form to keep editing the article to make your point while this discussion is underway. Particularly because we do not have RS-s calling Soon an ""aeronautical engineer."" There are many perfectly valid ways to portray Soon's less-than-admirable qualities, but this one is just incredibly stupid. " | 1 | [
2,
0,
113,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
445487d9e86e2d55 | == Proposed trimming of controversy section ==
Can we do something maybe to trim this article down a bit? The controversy section makes this article seem unnecessarily long. IMO the last three sub-sections in the controversies section could either be removed or summarized in a sentence or two. The voter fraud part doesn't really go anywhere, and it looks like the last two sections are of quotes that haven't really gotten much play in the media and aren't too important to her life in respect to her BLP. | 0 | [
2,
0,
6664,
4193,
21172,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
c6f1fee94765e456 | "
::WP:NPA. I could be a fascist anti-Semite, holocaust denying white supremacist homophobe rapist with leprosy, but if I make a statement which is logically correct, you cannot debunk it by simply making an ad hominem. You've accused others of breaching WP:NPA whilst ignoring it yourself, further causing me to question your ability to handle the current situation properly and effectively. | — email
" | 0 | [
2,
0,
487,
3439,
111,
2540,
1166,
127,
1047,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
44d647bd6e4a6b16 | "
::: BB is great, but that has nothing to do with contributing unsourced content. I don't know if the date is incorrect, but it must be supported by a reliable source. Mufka " | 0 | [
2,
0,
38304,
8112,
16,
372,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
aef6f4527a38bc0f | "That's why you call our reality, ""glorification."" " | 0 | [
2,
0,
113,
1711,
18,
99,
47,
486,
84,
2015,
6,
41039,
571,
10159,
5000,
39732,
22,
2,
1,
1
] |
e2bde576204ee903 | *So the news stories were based a false blog post, or did someone actually send fake messages to the families? The news stories make it sound like there was an elaborate hoax to send out fake message, but perhaps the journalists just don't want to admit that they screwed up and crowd sourced their stories. | 0 | [
2,
0,
38193,
340,
116,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
27bc5d471824055d | hi waz up is frist time. | 0 | [
2,
0,
22113,
7144,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
ecaa6b1036ba937a | ==Beaded Purse==
Shouldn't Hermione's beaded purse be mentioned in the Deathly Hallows section? It really helped them out. | 0 | [
2,
0,
12350,
1166,
328,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
c6b38704ab555153 | ", 7 June 2013 (UTC)
::Consistency is the most important thing. They should all be correct now. Pacific 23:59" | 0 | [
2,
0,
24514,
661,
6761,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
2579f2f129256a87 | "
:From the same guideline lower down is WP:NAMB, In many cases it is preferable not to have a hatnote when the name of the article is not ambiguous. Can't see that there would be any confusion when it is clearly disambiguated with the word 'book'. There are very many aircraft type monograph books with the name as the title, it would get very cluttered adding hatnotes to all of them. Hatnote is an editing guideline, not a policy. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
10972,
32903,
16,
41,
5390,
35075,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
7eeb8ebd206fa10d | == your comments on Steve Brookstein ==
Hi fella, you said that you saw me in Cannes, MIDEM. I don't need to say why i was there but comments where not very witty, using the old 'working in a burger bar gag' well done. Obviously you were not at MIDEM as a writer! You are either a wannabe singer or a ugly bird who can't get laid, either way I can't help you. Steve Brookstein | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
218,
75,
216,
596,
939,
21,
89,
53,
1450,
147,
45,
182,
33228,
6,
634,
5,
2
] |
3c0e3aff371b84c0 | "
Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Newcastle United F.C.. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to your being blocked from editing. [''''''] " | 0 | [
2,
0,
28502,
11248,
416,
328,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
489ec7eac1d4124e | == Requested move ==
Vladimir Alekseyevich Solovyov → – To be consistent with other articles listed at Vladimir Solovyov. We usually never sort by patronymic. N | 0 | [
2,
0,
11329,
12807,
42,
21,
10,
2579,
6880,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
69c4cb329a9a18cf | "
== Edit summaries and biting the newcomers ==
This edit summary, in which you stated that ""you need an account to edit Wikipedia"" is about as clear an example of biting the newcomers as can be imagined and is not acceptable. You should not revert changes merely because they have been made by IP editors, or give the impression in your edit summaries that you have. Such behaviour may be considered disruptive. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
113,
1437,
4894,
4819,
6,
11,
61,
47,
2305,
14,
41039,
6968,
240,
41,
1316,
7,
17668,
2
] |
b566816bb8d3972b | "
:::::No problem, and it didn't suck. ♥♥♥♥ " | 0 | [
2,
0,
463,
24,
399,
75,
23829,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
bfd046133ffece7d | "
:::I feel that they are consistent, but if you feel that strongly, then you could AFD both articles... " | 0 | [
2,
0,
37396,
205,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
f3a1c1bbefdc0e52 | Ne interesuje me sto kod drugih ima vise zastavica, kod Novaka ne mora da stoji ta nepostojeca drzava u kutijici. Jasno je navedeno u tekstu clanka da je nastupio za drzavu pod drugim imenom (tadasnjim). Vidim da si bezobrazan i da trazis rat izmenama, nikome drugom ne smeta, osim tebi. Istrajacu u ovome pa makar me blokirali, ali ako nastavis i tebe ce blokirati. Jos jednom bih te zamolio da ne vracas moje izmene i ostavi onako kako je ispravno. Zajebi vise, dosta mi je tvojih sranja. | 0 | [
2,
0,
863,
281,
4082,
4112,
31428,
196,
14511,
4112,
295,
1988,
658,
1020,
992,
102,
12402,
329,
1469,
2
] |
8f1b3ffe42985379 | :Oh do grow up. Just because you can't get your own way. Stop throwing the toys out of the pram. You've wanted to do this ever since you saw me. Your first thing was I've seen you've been blocked I'll carry on and then I'll get you blcoked well not this time, I've seen right through you, Pathetic point pathetic arguement. | 0 | [
2,
0,
7516,
109,
1733,
62,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
cfd853c4eafa852e | "
== marketing texts ==
Texts like that ""XMind Pro helps the users making the most of XMind"" and more are very typical marketing texts. I would prefer if the marketing department (one guy?) of XMind would avoid flooding information with commercial interest." | 0 | [
2,
0,
47572,
3569,
2474,
14301,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
270a19123c32575c | "
==Perverted Justice==
Hi. Yes I am sure. It seems a bit too slantish to me, plus I don't think (most) websites should have Wikipedia articles; I plan on making more noms in the future, this one was chosen early because I have a problem with this website. I tried to post on their forums to tell them to stop using the nonsense term ""wannabe pedophile"", but they just locked my topic. at " | 0 | [
2,
0,
250,
828,
350,
3369,
927,
1173,
13,
162,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
d93dc29a751c1b58 | January 2009 (UTC)
*1080p >> HERE COMES THE SOURCE
this is a picture of my TV full HD showing displaying the game at 1920x1080p, non 1080p games are displayed at 720p on PS3 unlike the XBox360 which upscales everything to 1080p by adding an infamous blur filter from halo's 640p to ninja gaiden's 585p. on ps3, bad company, mirror's edge and killzone beta are 720p, but GT5P, wipeout, a ton of japan only games you haven't heard before BUT I HAVE IMPORTED are 1080p, and MGS4 is 1080p as well. YOU HAVE NO SOURCES FOR 720P AND I HAVE A TON OF VALID SOURCES FOR 1080p SO FUCK OFF! 14:10, 4 | 1 | [
2,
0,
9847,
975,
15421,
591,
14465,
17831,
1691,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
7fd9b82bade36ddc | "
==Hey hey hey==
What's going on? Been a little while, I know. Just to ensure maximum classiness in my first post on your talk page in a while, how would you like to review my DYK nom? Heh. Law school is still a time-suck, but I had a brief period to finally finish that thing. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
2847,
444,
98,
205,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
9eb4fa6fba833475 | == Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Tintin: Breaking Free ==
Hi, I've added three sources to this article. I believe this should take care of the sourcing and notability concerns, and you may want to revisit your AfD comments. Best regards, | 0 | [
2,
0,
250,
8495,
1163,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
567352fb4fe0b61e | Strong Oppose. This was one uprising, directed by one Bulgarian organization, against the Ottoman empire, on several different locations. There is absolutely no need to split the article, on the contrary, there is a need to keep it together as some people pushing for an agenda tend to forget or willingly ignore half of the facts. | 0 | [
2,
0,
100,
6640,
24,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
0b73a382bdc26bc1 | " Roxboro Island is only in the ""Roxboro"" article once, so this problem is resolved. " | 0 | [
2,
0,
113,
3551,
15797,
32,
129,
11,
65,
1566,
4,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
bc1e2197c76f1332 | "
:Do you mean remarks on this talk page (above), or historical details in the article? As to the talk page, people may write what they think, and others may comment. You have as much power as anyone else on this site to ask questions. '''''' " | 0 | [
2,
0,
113,
1437,
32138,
35,
1832,
47,
1266,
4166,
15,
42,
1067,
1666,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
d0a0923fe4cc8bd6 | "Compass ===
On what grounds was the compass reference by Li Shu-hua removed? The newer research does not contradict Li Shu-hua's observation. In fact, it stresses his point, since the wording demonstartes that the passage does NOT contain a reference to a magnet.
*""However, it should be pointed out that in the Louen-heng text, on which Tchang Yin-lin and Wang Tchen-touo based their hypothesis, there is no explicit mention of a magnet.Li Shu-hua: “Origine de la Boussole 11. Aimant et Boussole,” Isis, Vol. 45, No. 2(1954), pp. 175-196 (180)""
*Original text (180): ""On peut remarquer que dans le texte du Louen-heng il n'y a pas de mention explicite d'aimant. Pour arriver au résultat ci-dessus indiqué, on est oblige de poser quelques hypotheses.""
::Twas not I who removed this. Anpersonalaccount maybe? In any case, I remember restoring a citation from him in the picture caption to the right.
Hey Gun Powder Ma, how could a word like magnet appeared over in the ancient texts by the way? The word magnet, which according to this article came from Greek word ""magnesian stone"".
::Perhaps he means the Chinese word (i.e., 攝石) for magnet? In any case, we should not expect Wang Chong to have truly understood what magnetism was; he simply described the effects of the geomancy ladle and bowl.
Well, we shall look out sources on this.
Hey, I just added and replaced the old source with a better ones! Lol
=== " | 0 | [
2,
0,
25117,
4135,
116,
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.