@openaphid fixed.. thanks!

Minor issue in javadoc of ByteBuf
Inside the section of **NIO Buffers** (generated from master branch), I found it states following:

```
To determine if a buffer can be converted into an NIO buffer, use nioBuffer().
```

Should `nioBufferCount()` be used here instead of `nioBuffer()`?

buffer/src/main/java/io/netty/buffer/BufType.java transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/DefaultChannelHandlerContext.java
buffer/src/main/java/io/netty/buffer/BufType.java transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/DefaultChannelHandlerContext.java
diff --git a/buffer/src/main/java/io/netty/buffer/BufType.java b/buffer/src/main/java/io/netty/buffer/BufType.java
index 2a82223a7e9..8b9ffd06740 100644
--- a/buffer/src/main/java/io/netty/buffer/BufType.java
+++ b/buffer/src/main/java/io/netty/buffer/BufType.java
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
  */
 public enum BufType {
     /**
-     * Operates one bytes.
+     * Operates on bytes.
      */
     BYTE,
 
diff --git a/transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/DefaultChannelHandlerContext.java b/transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/DefaultChannelHandlerContext.java
index b70c9e527ef..9987dc1f014 100755
--- a/transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/DefaultChannelHandlerContext.java
+++ b/transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/DefaultChannelHandlerContext.java
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ final class DefaultChannelHandlerContext extends DefaultAttributeMap implements
     // 'bridge' so that the two handlers access each other's buffer only via the bridges.
     // The content written into a bridge is flushed into the actual buffer by flushBridge().
     //
-    // Note we use an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater for atomic operations on these to safe memory. This will safe us
+    // Note we use an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater for atomic operations on these to save memory. This will save us
     // 64 bytes per Bridge.
     @SuppressWarnings("UnusedDeclaration")
     private volatile MessageBridge inMsgBridge;
