Yes that is certainly true. Do you mind sending us a PR to improve the wording?
Mockito#reset Condescending Documentation
Hello,

I just realised that the method `Mockito.reset()` existed at all. The documentation in the most recent version states:

>  Smart Mockito users hardly use this feature because they know it could be a sign of poor tests.

At the core, I totally agree, this shouldn't be necessary. Nevertheless, the first sentence of the comment feels rather rude / condescending. I suggest a rephrase to something like

> Using this method could be a sign of poor tests. \<rest of the doc here\>

Would help with that.

See the following link: https://github.com/mockito/mockito/blob/main/src/main/java/org/mockito/Mockito.java#L2581



src/main/java/org/mockito/Mockito.java
src/main/java/org/mockito/Mockito.java
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/mockito/Mockito.java b/src/main/java/org/mockito/Mockito.java
index 98c46e1c80..ee5a133038 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/mockito/Mockito.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/mockito/Mockito.java
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@
  *
  * <h3 id="17">17. <a class="meaningful_link" href="#resetting_mocks" name="resetting_mocks">Resetting mocks</a> (Since 1.8.0)</h3>
  *
- * Smart Mockito users hardly use this feature because they know it could be a sign of poor tests.
+ * Using this method could be an indication of poor testing.
  * Normally, you don't need to reset your mocks, just create new mocks for each test method.
  * <p>
  * Instead of <code>reset()</code> please consider writing simple, small and focused test methods over lengthy, over-specified tests.
