Short Communication: Analysis of the ultimate wood composition of a forest plantation species, Eucalyptus pellita, to estimate its bioelectricity potency




Abstract. Haqiqi MT, Hudaya D, Septiana HA, Ramadhan R, Yuliansyah, Suwinarti W, Amirta R. 2022. Short Communicarion: Analysis of the ultimate wood composition of a forest plantation species, Eucalyptus pellita, to estimate its bioelectricity potency. Biodiversitas 23: 2389-2394. Eucalyptus pellita F. Muell is one of the short rotation wood crop species widely planted in tropical countries, including Indonesia. Woody biomass obtained from this species is commonly utilized to produce fiber in the pulp and paper industry. Due to the growing interest in expanding E. pellita plantations, the potential application of E. pellita woody biomass to provide sustainable energy feedstock has been studied. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the ultimate composition of E. pellita wood (carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O)) to estimate its higher heating value (HHV) and bioelectricity potency. The wood samples were harvested at different plant ages, from the first to the fifth year. The percentage of biomass composition, including cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and extractives, was also calculated. The results demonstrated that lignin in the E. pellita wood increased to align with the increased plant age. Thus, this pattern was followed by significantly increased C content in the wood since lignin contained a primary source of C. Hence, this condition might enhance the HHV and electricity potency. The ratio of H/C and O/C was found to be one of the most promising factors in improving HHV compared to the extractive/lignin ratio. In the fifth year, the electricity potency of E. pellita showed the highest value (1.71 MWh ton-1). Therefore, this study suggests that E. pellita possesses the potential to be one of the promising crops for green electricity production.


Amirta R, Herawati E, Suwinarti W, Watanabe T. 2016a. Two-steps utilization of shorea wood waste biomass for the production of oyster mushroom and biogas–a zero waste approach. Agric Agric Sci Procedia, 9, 202-208. DOI:
Amirta R, Yuliansyah, Angi EM, Ananto BR, Setiyono B, Haqiqi MT, Septiana HA, Lodong M, Oktavianto RN, 2016b. Plant diversity and energy potency of community forestin East Kalimantan, Indonesia: Searching for fast growing wood species for energy production. Nusantara Biosci, 8(1): 22-31. DOI:
Amirta R, Haqiqi MT, Saparwadi S, Septia E, Mujiasih D, Setiawan KA, Sekedang MA, Yuliansyah Y, Wijaya A, Setiyono B, Suwinarti W. 2019. Searching for potential wood biomass for green energy feedstock: A study in tropical swamp-peat forest of Kutai Kertanegara, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 20(6): 1516-1523. DOI:
Arisandi R, Ashitani T, Takahashi K, Marsoem SN, Lukmandaru G. 2020. Lipophilic extractives of the wood and bark from Eucalyptus pellita F. Muell grown in Merauke, Indonesia. J Wood Chem Technol, 40(2), 146-154. DOI:
Ashokkumar V, Venkatkarthick R, Jayashree S, Chuetor S, Dharmaraj S, Kumar G, Chen WH, Ngamcharussrivichai C. 2022. Recent advances in lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and value-added bioproducts-A critical review. Bioresour Technol, 344, 126195. DOI:
Boumanchar I, Charafeddine K, Chhiti Y, Alaoui FEMH, Sahibed-Dine A, Bentiss F, Jama C, Bensitel M. 2019. Biomass higher heating value prediction from ultimate analysis using multiple regression and genetic programming. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 9(3), 499-509. DOI:
Briones-Hidrovo A, Copa J, Tarelho LA, Gonçalves C, da Costa TP, Dias AC. 2021. Environmental and energy performance of residual forest biomass for electricity generation: Gasification vs. combustion. J Clean Prod, 289, 125680. DOI:
Chen D, Gao A, Cen K, Zhang J, Cao X, Ma Z. 2018. Investigation of biomass torrefaction based on three major components: Hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Energy Convers Manag, 169, 228-237. DOI:
Cui H, Ninomiya Y, Masui M, Mizukoshi H, Sakano T, Kanaoka C. 2006. Fundamental behaviors in combustion of raw sewage sludge. Energy fuels, 20(1), 77-83. DOI:
Demirba? A. 2001. Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag, 42(11), 1357-1378. DOI:
Demirba? A. 2008. Importance of biomass energy sources for Turkey. Energy Policy, 36(2), 834-842. DOI:
Fiskari J, Kilpeläinen P. 2021. Acid sulfite pulping of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus pellita as a pretreatment method for multiproduct biorefineries. Asia?Pac J Chem Eng, 16(6), 2707. DOI:
Ghugare SB, Tiwary S, Elangovan V, Tambe SS. 2014. Prediction of higher heating value of solid biomass fuels using artificial intelligence formalisms. Bioenergy Res, 7(2), 681-692. DOI:
Hardiyanto EB, Inail MA, Nambiar EK. 2021. Productivity of Eucalyptus pellita in Sumatra: Acacia mangium Legacy, Response to Phosphorus, and Site Variables for Guiding Management. Forests, 12(9), 1186. DOI:
Haqiqi MT, Suwinarti W, Amirta R. 2018. Response surface methodology to simplify calculation of wood energy potency from tropical short rotation coppice species, In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 144(1), 012041. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/144/1/012041.
Islas J, Manzini F, Masera O, Vargas V. 2019. Solid biomass to heat and power. In The role of bioenergy in the bioeconomy (pp. 145-177). Academic Press.
Jang SK, Choi JH, Kim JH, Kim H, Jeong H, Choi I.G. 2020. Statistical analysis of glucose production from Eucalyptus pellita with individual control of chemical constituents. Renew Energ, 148, 298-308. DOI:
Konuk F, Zeren F, Akp?nar S, Y?ld?z ?. 2021. Biomass energy consumption and economic growth: Further evidence from NEXT-11 countries. Energy Reports, 7, 4825-4832. DOI:
Lee BH, Sh L, Lee DG, Jeon CH. 2021. Effect of torrefaction and ashless process on combustion and NOx emission behaviors of woody and herbaceous biomass. Biomass Bioenerg, 151, 106133. DOI:
Leksono B, Kurinobu S, Ide Y. 2008. Realized genetic gains observed in second generation seedling seed orchards of Eucalyptus pellita in Indonesia. J For Res, 13(2), 110-116. DOI:
Ma Z, Yang Y, Wu Y, Xu J, Peng H, Liu X, Zhang W, Wang S. 2019. In-depth comparison of the physicochemical characteristics of bio-char derived from biomass pseudo components: Hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 140, 195-204. DOI:
McKendry P. 2002. Energy production from biomass: overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol, 83, 55-63. DOI:
Menucelli JR, Amorim EP, Freitas MLM, Zanata M, Cambuim J, de Moraes MLT, Yamaji FM, da Silva Júnior FG, Longui EL. 2019. Potential of Hevea brasiliensis clones, Eucalyptus pellita and Eucalyptus tereticornis wood as raw materials for bioenergy based on higher heating value. Bioenergy Res, 12(4), 992-999. DOI:
Mukhdlor A, Haqiqi MT, Tirkamiana MT, Suwinarti W, Amirta R. 2021. Assessment of wood biomass productivity from Anthocephalus macrophyllus forest plantation for energy production, In: Advances in Biological Sciences Research, 11, 21-25. DOI:
Nhuchhen DR, Afzal MT. 2017. HHV predicting correlations for torrefied biomass using proximate and ultimate analyses. Bioengineering, 4(1), 7. DOI:
Nimmanterdwong P, Chalermsinsuwan B, Piumsomboon P. 2021. Prediction of lignocellulosic biomass structural components from ultimate/proximate analysis. Energy, 222, 119945. DOI:
Nussbaumer T. 2003. Combustion and co-combustion of biomass: fundamentals, technologies, and primary measures for emission reduction. Energy fuels, 17(6), 1510-1521. DOI:
Ozyuguran A, Akturk A, Yaman S. 2018. Optimal use of condensed parameters of ultimate analysis to predict the calorific value of biomass. Fuel, 214, 640-646. DOI:
Poddar S, Kamruzzaman M, Sujan SMA, Hossain M, Jamal MS, Gafur MA, Khanam M. 2014. Effect of compression pressure on lignocellulosic biomass pellet to improve fuel properties: Higher heating value. Fuel, 131, 43-48. DOI:
Salehi B, Sharifi-Rad J, Quispe C, Llaique H, Villalobos M, Smeriglio A, Trombetta D, Ezzat EM, Martins N. 2019. Insights into Eucalyptus genus chemical constituents, biological activities and health-promoting effects. Trends Food Sci Technol, 91, 609-624. DOI:
Sansaniwal SK, Pal K, Rosen MA, Tyagi SK. 2017. Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 72, 363-384. DOI:
Sheng C, Azevedo, JLT. 2005. Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data. Biomass Bioenerg, 28(5), 499-507. DOI:
Telmo C, Lousada J, Moreira N. 2010. Proximate analysis, backwards stepwise regression between gross calorific value, ultimate and chemical analysis of wood. Bioresour Technol, 101(11), 3808-3815. DOI:
Wise LE, Murphy M, D’Addieco AA. 1946. Chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and on studies on the hemicelluloses. Paper Trade J 122 (2): 35-43.
Xing J, Luo K, Wang H, Fan J. 2019. Estimating biomass major chemical constituents from ultimate analysis using a random forest model. Bioresour Technol, 288, 121541. DOI:
Xue S, Lewandowski I, Wang X, Yi Z. 2016. Assessment of the production potentials of Miscanthus on marginal land in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:932–943. DOI:
Yuliansyah, Haqiqi MT, Septia E, Mujiasih D, Septiana HA, Setiawan KA, Setiyono B, Angi EM, Sari NM, Kusuma IW, Suwinarti W, Amirta R. 2019. Diversity of plant species growing during fallow period of shifting cultivation and potential of its biomass for sustainable energy production in Mahakam Ulu, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 20(8): 2236-2242. DOI:
Zafar MW, Sinha A, Ahmed Z, Qin Q, Zaidi SAH. 2021. Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: the role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 142, 110868. DOI:

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>