Make your own free website on

Homeopathy and Sympathetic Vibratory Physics


                           Scientific  Homeopathy            

                  The well known aphorism of homoeopathy " similia Similibus Curentur" which can be explained as: the same substance which can produce the specific symptoms in a healthy individual, may cure the patient of a disease producing identical or similar symptoms. The correct remedy should resonate with the illness (in a biological sense).

   Health, to the homeopath, is a state of harmony between the parts of the body and also between the person as a whole and the Cosmos. In health. the as yet unexplained life force in each person is vigorous. It is usually spoken of as the vital force, which in disease is the true curative mechanism. The object of giving the similar remedy is to stimulate the vital force. The object of hygiene and mechanical intervention is to clear its path of obstruction, for the vital force to act. No remedy can cure disease; as such it can only, at best, help the vital force to regain proper function. The keenly intuitive , brilliantly logical and scientific mind of Hahnemann perceives the study of diseases in unmistakable terms that disease is not a fixed entity but an ever changing process like that of life itself. Disease is an abstraction of our mental concepts by collating the presenting signs and symptoms; the factual reality is the diseased person. It is our mind which, for the purpose of practical convenience, has separated the disorder from the diseased person and given these concepts general names but in fact the educated mind attempts to separate what is inseparable.

                              Barthez conceived the presence of the Vital Force in every part of the body, but unable to work separately. He maintained that diseases are affections of this Vital Force. R'eit (1800), a contemporary of Barthez, hypothesized that this Vital Force is inherent in matter and inseparable from it. The doctrine of the Vital Force of Hahnemann maintains that disease is a morbid affection of this force. This force gives animation to the body and mind, and this animation is weakened during illness.

The first edition of the Organon of Medicine was published in 1810.There was no mention of this force and its derangement, nor is it mentioned in the three subsequent editions, which followed it.In 1833, in the last (fifth) edition of this work publishedin his life time. the Doctrine of the Vital Force is enunciated.Again, in the fourth volume of the first edition of Chronic Disease published in 1830, there is the statement, ,,with the existence of the never resting, preservative Vital Force in our organism, a speedy and complete cure occurs". The question today is, what led Hahnemann to this conclusion that health and diseases are merely two different states of this Vital Force. If there was no doctrine of Vital Force, his individualisation of patients, drug dynamisation and infinitesimals would have been hard to explain and would seem illogical. The Doctrine of Vital Force was positively the outcome of his approach to the individuality of the patient and the specific remedy.

       Vital Force as defined by Hahnemann, is the spirit-like dynamic power of life. It is  this Life Force which maintains life in living beings.The person is capable of self protection because of this Vital Force. Unceasingly, we are exposed to a millenia of pathological forces, but we do not constantly fall ill because the Vital Force is continually affording protection against these morbific forces.

This is the Life Force which is deranged first by morbid forces. The Life Force overcomes the disease forces eventually. Either due to the long continued exposure or due to the greater strength of the devitalizing forces, the Vital Force may be deranged. It starts producing abnormal signs and symptoms, which indicate its disharmony due to the disease. The normal functions of the body are changed.The body start behaving abnormally.The sensations of various kinds are felt.The power of self-protection is diminished and the body becomes subject to many sufferings.The normal co-ordination between the mind and the body is altered and the parts or organs become dysfunctional.  The Vital Force is  a dynamic power, hence it can be only affected by other dynamic forces.The dysfunction of the Vital Force can be cured only by the dynamic power of medicine. No cure is possible by crude drugs.Hahnemann's theories were evolved from clinical observations, moulded with practical experience. His reasons were based on practical considerations. Metaphysics had no fascination for him. Nevertheless, he was forced to postulate the concept of life principle, which he probably tried to avoid in the first four editions of his work. His opponents consider his Doctrine of Vital Force to be the most controversial point in the homoeopathic system of medicine.To deny a Vital Force seemed to Hahnemann, like being unable to distinguish between a cadaver and a living body:-

"As to the bow the cord is, So to the body is the Vital Force." -Long Fellow.

In the- Sixth edition Hahnemann changed the term to Vital Energy, probably to keep it in line with the Oriental concepts of Qi, and Prana; with which he was totally familiar.

Hahnemann placed the strongest emphasis on individuality and on individualising in disease. Each person suffers, according to him, from nameless illness, which never before occured in the same manner, in the same person, under the same circumstances, and which can never again occur in exactly the same manner. Hahnemann further maintains that, no true cure can take place without a rigid personal treatment (individualisation) of each case. The keenly intuitive , brilliantly logical and scientific mind of Hahnemann perceives the study of diseases in unmistakable terms that disease is not a fixed entity but an ever changing  process like that of life itself. Disease is an abstraction made by our mental concepts by collating the presenting signs and symptoms; the factual reality is the diseased person. It is our mind which, for the purpose of practical convenience, has separated the disorder from the diseased person and has given these concepts general names but in fact the educated mind attempts to separate what is inseparable.

                      Man must be regarded as greater than the sum of his parts; a whole human being in health and disease and his reactions to his environment cannot be overlooked. As the twentieth century advanced, the torrent of scientific discovery rushed on impetuously, that it all but engulfed the humanism of medicine. In the pursuit of knowledge, man was fragmented and his organs, tissues, cells and secretions subjected to intensive study using the Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm of scientific methodology. Unless basic medical thought be directed to the study of the whole man in relation to his external and internal milieu, it will be misconceived in aim, structure and balance.

Hippocrates, the father of Western Medicine, had written that, "The nature of the human body can only be understood as a whole". But this received scant attention till Hahnemann discovered the therapeutic Law of Homoeopathy and the provings on healthy humans, thus enabling consideration of man's emotions, his mind and his body as a single inter-reacting unity. Hahnemann's greatest contribution may be that he made it possible by his unique method of human provings (self-experimentation), to fully apply the srmilia principle. This was conceived in Ayurveda, as also by Hippocrates, and fairly forcefully expressed by Paracelsus and suggested by Avicenna and Galen. However, no one elaborated and systematised and used it as a governing principle in prescribing until Hahnemann did so. The main infrastructure that others lacked to establish this methodology was the provings. Hahnemann also occupies a special place as one of those who carried out human experiments on himself, his family, friends and students. A few names stand out before him who did self-experimentation to find out the properties of drugs.Shen Nung in China (circa 2500 B.C.) may be the first. It is also said that Paracelsus preferred to prescribe medicines that he had tried on himself.

     The modern medical world has, in many ways, accepted Hahnemann's Similia, Simplex and even Minimum. Nowhere, is this more apparent than in the practice of modern immunology and vaccine therapy.

At the tomb in the special Cemeterie du Pere Lachaise in Paris, there could not have been a more appropriate epitaph; "Non inutilis Vixi " (not lived in vain).

         From my tutorial scrapebook in Clinical Homeopathy

     Stefanatos ( 1997 , 228 )tells us that the  " electromagnetic fields (EMF) emanating from bacteria,viruses and toxic substances
affect the cells of the body and weaken its constitution." So vitalforce is identified quite explicitly
animal or human being if the vital force of healing is suppressed or lacking" ( Stefanatos
1997,229 ). So health or sickness is determined by who wins the battle between  Good and Bad electromagnetic waves in the body." 

The Quantum Spherical Standing Wave
The Primordial Harmonic Template of the Universe - Fusion Anomaly

In-Going and Out-Going Waves
The Spherical Standing Wave ( SWM=Wave Structure of Matter )

Bioinformation-Energy Interactions
by fusion Anomaly

  An important feature of all biological objects, from the lowest to the highest evolutionary form - is their bio-information and energy_ interaction
with the_ environment. It must be remembered that at the time of biological emergence, millions of years ago, the electric and magnetic fields were already in place. Every living organism has had to adapt, if not evolve, with electric and magnetic fields. Failure to adapt leads to extinction. Thus, every living
object has its own ElectroMagnetic Energy (EME) which can change with external conditions, including energy (paraphysical) spectrums not
connected directly with EME.


What's New?

Dr.FHLew ( Malaysia )
Email Address:
Handphone : 0176963793

- By Dr. Douglas M. Borland










                   Excerpt from :  The British  Homoeopathic  journal,   March   1946
