Take the 2-minute tour ×

Since in the military ranks, lieutenant is lower than a major. Why is it that in the rankings of generals......major general is lower than a lieutenant general?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Daniel, Robusto, Mahnax, Lynn, FumbleFingers Mar 12 '12 at 3:04


This is waaaaay off-topic. –  Mahnax Mar 12 '12 at 2:38
Off-topic, but here's a link that explains it: xenograg.com/364/excerpts/origin-of-rank-and-grades-of-general –  Lynn Mar 12 '12 at 2:56
Could we "migrate" this question to say, the history site? –  Tom Au Mar 12 '12 at 13:04

2 Answers 2

Because it comes from Sergeant Major General and a Sergeant Major is, of course, lower than a Lieutenant.

share|improve this answer

Wikipedia has the answer:

In French history, “lieutenant du roi” was a title born by the officer sent with military powers to represent the king in certain provinces. A lieutenant du roi was sometimes known as a lieutenant general to distinguish him from lieutenants subordinate to mere captains. The sergeant acting as staff officer to the captain general was known as the sergeant-major general. This was eventually shortened to major general, while captain general was shortened to simply general. This is the reason a major outranks a lieutenant, but a lieutenant general outranks a major general. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_rank

share|improve this answer
