Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet
question
stringlengths
39
56
options
sequencelengths
4
4
answer
stringlengths
2
12
query_type
stringclasses
3 values
target_type
stringclasses
3 values
query_value
stringlengths
2
14
correct_value
stringlengths
2
12
abstracts
sequencelengths
3
3
Which family does the subfamily 'HERV30-int' belong to?
[ "DNA", "Alu", "hAT-Tip100", "ERV1" ]
ERV1
Subfamily
Family
HERV30-int
ERV1
[ "The human genome harbors numerous distinct families of so-called human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) which are remnants of exogenous retroviruses that entered the germ line millions of years ago. We describe here the hitherto little-characterized betaretrovirus HERV-K(HML-5) family (named HERVK22 in Repbase) in greater detail. Out of 139 proviruses, only a few loci represent full-length proviruses, and many lack gag protease and/or env gene regions. We generated a consensus sequence from multiple alignment of 62 HML-5 loci that displays open reading frames for the four major retroviral proteins. Four HML-5 long terminal repeat (LTR) subfamilies were identified that are associated with monophyletic proviral bodies, implying different evolution of HML-5 LTRs and genes. Sequence analysis indicated that the proviruses formed approximately 55 million years ago. Accordingly, HML-5 proviral sequences were detected in Old World and New World primates but not in prosimians. No recent activity is associated with this HERV family. We also conclude that the HML-5 consensus sequence primer binding site is identical to methionine tRNA. Therefore, the family should be designated HERV-M. Our study provides important insights into the structure and evolution of the oldest betaretrovirus in the primate genome known to date.", "A substantial amount of the human genome is composed of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs). Manifold HERV families have been identified, among them several so-called HERV-K(HML) families. Although the HERV-K(HML-2) family has been studied in detail, other HERV-K families are not as well characterized. We describe here the HERV-K HML-3 family in more detail. We estimate that there are about 140 proviral loci or remains of such per haploid genome. Most loci are severely mutated. Proviruses displaying larger deletions in gag and pol are common. A multiple alignment of 73 HERV-K(HML-3) sequences displays several potentially important differences compared with the HERVK9I sequence in Repbase. A consensus sequence with open reading frames for all retroviral genes was generated, for which intact dUTPase motifs and env gene variants with different coding capacities are observed. Phylogenetic analysis shows near-monophyly with distinction of two closely related subgroups. Proviruses formed about 36 million years ago. However, no continuous activity through primate evolution is indicated.", "Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) represent the inheritance of ancient germ-line cell infections by exogenous retroviruses and the subsequent transmission of the integrated proviruses to the descendants. ERVs have the same internal structure as exogenous retroviruses. While no replication-competent HERVs have been recognized, some retain up to three of four intact ORFs. HERVs have been classified before, with varying scope and depth, notably in the RepBase/RepeatMasker system. However, existing classifications are bewildering. There is a need for a systematic, unifying and simple classification. We strived for a classification which is traceable to previous classifications and which encompasses HERV variation within a limited number of clades. The human genome assembly GRCh 37/hg19 was analyzed with RetroTector, which primarily detects relatively complete Class I and II proviruses. A total of 3173 HERV sequences were identified. The structure of and relations between these proviruses was resolved through a multi-step classification procedure that involved a novel type of similarity image analysis (\"Simage\") which allowed discrimination of heterogeneous (noncanonical) from homogeneous (canonical) HERVs. Of the 3173 HERVs, 1214 were canonical and segregated into 39 canonical clades (groups), belonging to class I (Gamma- and Epsilon-like), II (Beta-like) and III (Spuma-like). The groups were chosen based on (1) sequence (nucleotide and Pol amino acid), similarity, (2) degree of fit to previously published clades, often from RepBase, and (3) taxonomic markers. The groups fell into 11 supergroups. The 1959 noncanonical HERVs contained 31 additional, less well-defined groups. Simage analysis revealed several types of mosaicism, notably recombination and secondary integration. By comparing flanking sequences, LTRs and completeness of gene structure, we deduced that some noncanonical HERVs proliferated after the recombination event. Groups were further divided into envelope subgroups (altogether 94) based on sequence similarity and characteristic \"immunosuppressive domain\" motifs. Intra and inter(super)group, as well as intraclass, recombination involving envelope genes (\"env snatching\") was a common event. LTR divergence indicated that HERV-K(HML2) and HERVFC had the most recent integrations, HERVL and HUERSP3 the oldest. A comprehensive HERV classification and characterization approach was undertaken. It should be applicable for classification of all ERVs. Recombination was common among HERV ancestors." ]
Which subfamily does the class 'LTR' belong to?
[ "L1PA15-16", "MER102a", "LTR50", "HERVK11D-int" ]
HERVK11D-int
Class
Subfamily
LTR
HERVK11D-int
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are a class of eukaryotic mobile elements characterized by a distinctive sequence similarity-based structure. Hence they are well suited for computational identification. Current software allows for a comprehensive genome-wide de novo detection of such elements. The obvious next step is the classification of newly detected candidates resulting in (super-)families. Such a de novo classification approach based on sequence-based clustering of transposon features has been proposed before, resulting in a preliminary assignment of candidates to families as a basis for subsequent manual refinement. However, such a classification workflow is typically split across a heterogeneous set of glue scripts and generic software (for example, spreadsheets), making it tedious for a human expert to inspect, curate and export the putative families produced by the workflow. We have developed LTRsift, an interactive graphical software tool for semi-automatic postprocessing of de novo predicted LTR retrotransposon annotations. Its user-friendly interface offers customizable filtering and classification functionality, displaying the putative candidate groups, their members and their internal structure in a hierarchical fashion. To ease manual work, it also supports graphical user interface-driven reassignment, splitting and further annotation of candidates. Export of grouped candidate sets in standard formats is possible. In two case studies, we demonstrate how LTRsift can be employed in the context of a genome-wide LTR retrotransposon survey effort. LTRsift is a useful and convenient tool for semi-automated classification of newly detected LTR retrotransposons based on their internal features. Its efficient implementation allows for convenient and seamless filtering and classification in an integrated environment. Developed for life scientists, it is helpful in postprocessing and refining the output of software for predicting LTR retrotransposons up to the stage of preparing full-length reference sequence libraries. The LTRsift software is freely available at http://www.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/LTRsift under an open-source license.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a class of RNA-replicating transposon elements (TEs) that can alter genome structure and function by moving positions, repositioning genes, shifting exons, and causing chromosomal rearrangements. LTR-RTs are widespread in many plant genomes and constitute a significant portion of the genome. Their movement and activity in eukaryotic genomes can provide insight into genome evolution and gene function, especially when LTR-RTs are located near or within genes. Building the redundant and non-redundant LTR-RTs libraries and their annotations for species lacking this resource requires extensive bioinformatics pipelines and expensive computing power to analyze large amounts of genomic data. This increases the need for online services that provide computational resources with minimal overhead and maximum efficiency. Here, we present MegaLTR as a web server and standalone pipeline that detects intact LTR-RTs at the whole-genome level and integrates multiple tools for structure-based, homologybased, and de novo identification, classification, annotation, insertion time determination, and LTR-RT gene chimera analysis. MegaLTR also provides statistical analysis and visualization with multiple tools and can be used to accelerate plant species discovery and assist breeding programs in their efforts to improve genomic resources. We hope that the development of online services such as MegaLTR, which can analyze large amounts of genomic data, will become increasingly important for the automated detection and annotation of LTR-RT elements. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar and El Allali." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'AluYb9' belong to?
[ "Alu", "ERVL-MaLR", "DNA", "ERVK" ]
Alu
Subfamily
Family
AluYb9
Alu
[ "Alu elements are the most abundant mobile elements in the human genome, with over 1 million copies and constituting more than 10% of the genome. The majority of these Alu elements were inserted into the primate genome 35 to 60 million years ago, but certain subfamilies of Alu elements are relatively very new and suspected to be still evolving. We attempted to trace the source/master copies of all human-specific members of the Alu Yb lineage using a computational approach by clustering similar Yb elements and constructing an evolutionary relation among the members of a cluster. We discovered that one copy of Yb8 at 10p14 is the source of several active Yb8 copies, which retrotransposed to generate 712 copies or 54% of all human-specific Yb8 elements. We detected eight other Yb8 elements that had generated ten or more copies, potentially acting as 'stealth drivers'. One Yb8 element at 14q32.31 seemed to act as the source copy for all Yb9 elements tested, having producing 13 active Yb9 elements, and subsequently generated a total of 131 full-length copies. We identified and characterized three new subclasses of Yb elements: Yb8a1, Yb10 and Yb11. Their copy numbers in the reference genome are 75, 8 and 16. We analysed personal genome data from the 1000 Genome Project and detected an additional 6 Yb8a1, 3 Yb10 and 15 Yb11 copies outside the reference genome. Our analysis indicates that the Yb8a1 subfamily has a similar age to Yb9 (1.93 million years and 2.15 million years, respectively), while Yb10 and Yb11 evolved only 1.4 and 0.71 million years ago, suggesting a linear evolutionary path from Yb8a1 to Yb10 and then to Yb11. Our preliminary data indicate that members in Yb10 and Yb11 are mostly polymorphic, indicating their young age. Our findings suggest that the Yb lineage is still evolving with new subfamilies being formed. Due to their very young age and the high rate of being polymorphic, insertions from these young subfamilies are very useful genetic markers for studying human population genetics and migration patterns, and the trend for mobile element insertions in the human genome.", "Alu repeats are the most abundant family of repeats in the human genome, with over 1 million copies comprising 10% of the genome. They have been implicated in human genetic disease and in the enrichment of gene-rich segmental duplications in the human genome, and they form a rich fossil record of primate and human history. Alu repeat elements are believed to have arisen from the replication of a small number of source elements, whose evolution over time gives rise to the 31 Alu subfamilies currently reported in Repbase Update. We apply a novel method to identify and statistically validate 213 Alu subfamilies. We build an evolutionary tree of these subfamilies and conclude that the history of Alu evolution is more complex than previous studies had indicated.", "Research into great ape genomes has revealed widely divergent activity levels over time for Alu elements. However, the diversity of this mobile element family in the genome of the western lowland gorilla has previously been uncharacterized. Alu elements are primate-specific short interspersed elements that have been used as phylogenetic and population genetic markers for more than two decades. Alu elements are present at high copy number in the genomes of all primates surveyed thus far. The AluY subfamily and its derivatives have been recognized as the evolutionarily youngest Alu subfamily in the Old World primate lineage. Here we use a combination of computational and wet-bench laboratory methods to assess and catalog AluY subfamily activity level and composition in the western lowland gorilla genome (gorGor3.1). A total of 1,075 independent AluY insertions were identified and computationally divided into 10 subfamilies, with the largest number of gorilla-specific elements assigned to the canonical AluY subfamily. The retrotransposition activity level appears to be significantly lower than that seen in the human and chimpanzee lineages, while higher than that seen in orangutan genomes, indicative of differential Alu amplification in the western lowland gorilla lineage as compared to other Homininae." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'MER88'?
[ "LTR", "SINE", "LINE", "DNA" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
MER88
LTR
[ "The higher levels of the classification of transposable elements (TEs) from Classes to Superfamilies or Families, is regularly updated, but the lower levels (below the Family) have received little investigation. In particular, this applies to the Families that include a large number of copies. In this article we propose an automatic classification of DNA sequences. This procedure is based on an aggregation process using a pairwise matrix of distances, allowing us to define several groups characterized by a sphere with a central sequence and a radius. This method was tested on the mariner Family, because this is probably one of the most extensively studied Families. Several Subfamilies had already been defined from phylogenetic analyses based on multiple alignments of complete or partial amino-acid sequences of the transposase. The classification obtained here from DNA sequences of 935 items matches the phylogenies of the transposase. The rate of error from a posteriori re-assignment is relatively low.", "Mariner-like elements (MLE) are Class II transposable elements that are very widespread among eukaryotic genomes. One MLE belonging to the mauritiana subfamily, named Botmar1, has been identified in the genome of the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris. gDNA hybridization with the Botmar1 transposase ORF revealed that about 230 elements are present in each haploid genome of B. terrestris that consist entirely of 1.3- and 0.85-kbp elements. The analysis of their sequences revealed that there are two Botmar1 subfamilies of similar ages in the Bombus terrestris genome: one is composed entirely of 1.3-kpb elements, whereas the second comprises both completed and deleted elements. Our previous data indicated that the internally deleted form, which correspond to the 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements occur in other distantly related hymenopteran genomes. Because the presence of similar 1.3- and 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements in some distantly related hymenopteran species cannot be explained by horizontal transfers, the nucleic acid sequence properties of these elements were further investigated. We found that certain structural properties in their nucleic acid sequence might explain the occurrence of 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements presenting similarly located internal deletions in hymenopteran genomes.", "Mariner-like elements (MLE) are members from class II of transposable elements also known as DNA transposons. These elements have a wide distribution among different groups of organisms, including insects, which can be explained by horizontal and vertical gene-transfer. MLE families have been described in tephritid flies and other genera. During screening for Wolbachia bacteria in fruit flies of the genus Anastrepha, we discovered two sequences related to mariner-like elements. Based on these sequences, we designed primers that allowed us to isolate and characterize two new mariner-like elements (Anmar1 and Anmar2) in Anastrepha flies. These elements, which belong to the mellifera and rosa subfamilies have a low nucleotide diversity, and are probably inactive and acquired by vertical transfer. This is the first report of mariner-like transposons in flies found in South America." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'hAT-Tip100'?
[ "LTR", "DNA", "SINE", "LINE" ]
DNA
Family
Class
hAT-Tip100
DNA
[ "Tip100 is an Ac-like transposable element that belongs to the hAT superfamily. First discovered in Ipomoea purpurea (common morning glory), it was classified as an autonomous element capable of movement within the genome. As Tip100 data were already available in databases, the sequences of related elements in ten additional species of Ipomoea and five commercial varieties were isolated and analyzed. Evolutionary analysis based on sequence diversity in nuclear ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS), was also applied to compare the evolution of these elements with that of Tip100 in the Ipomoea genus. Tip100 sequences were found in I. purpurea, I. nil, I. indica and I. alba, all of which showed high levels of similarity. The results of phylogenetic analysis of transposon sequences were congruent with the phylogenetic topology obtained for ITS sequences, thereby demonstrating that Tip100 is restricted to a particular group of species within Ipomoea. We hypothesize that Tip100 was probably acquired from a common ancestor and has been transmitted vertically within this genus.", "The hAT family is a group of transposable elements of the terminal inverted repeat class, which includes Ac of maize, hobo of Drosophila and Tam3 of Antirrhinum (snapdragon). All the members of this family so far examined are known to comprise complete and defective copies, with a good correspondence to autonomous and non-autonomous elements, respectively. Internal deletion is the most common cause of defective copies. Tol2, a transposable element of the medaka fish Oryzias latipes, is a member of the hAT family. We examined, mainly by the genomic Southern blot analysis, variation in the structure of copies of this element, and revealed that there are few or no internally deleted copies. This situation is unusual in a member of the hAT family. Possible causes of this anomaly are discussed.", "The hAT transposons, very abundant in all kingdoms, have a common evolutionary origin probably predating the plant-fungi-animal divergence. In this paper we present their general characteristics. Members of this superfamily belong to Class II transposable elements. hAT elements share transposase, short terminal inverted repeats and eight base-pairs duplication of genomic target. We focus on hAT elements in Drosophila, especially hobo. Its distribution, dynamics and impact on genome restructuring in laboratory strains as well as in natural populations are reported. Finally, the evolutionary history of hAT elements, their domestication and use as transgenic tools are discussed." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'ERVL'?
[ "SINE", "LTR", "DNA", "LINE" ]
LTR
Family
Class
ERVL
LTR
[ "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), or LTR retrotransposons, are a class of transposable elements that are highly represented in mammalian genomes. Human ERVs (HERVs) make up roughly 8.3% of the genome and over the course of evolution, HERV elements underwent positive selection and accrued mutations that rendered them non-infectious; thereby, the genome could co-opt them into constructive roles with important biological functions. In the past two decades, with the help of advances in sequencing technology, ERVs are increasingly considered to be important components of the innate immune response. While typically silenced, expression of HERVs can be induced in response to traumatic, toxic, or infection-related stress, leading to a buildup of viral transcripts and under certain circumstances, proteins, including functionally active reverse transcriptase and viral envelopes. The biological activity of HERVs in the context of the innate immune response can be based on the functional effect of four major viral components: (1) HERV LTRs, (2) HERV-derived RNAs, (3) HERV-derived RNA:DNA duplexes and cDNA, and (4) HERV-derived proteins and ribonucleoprotein complexes. In this review, we will discuss the implications of HERVs in all four contexts in relation to innate immunity and their association with various pathological disease states.", "Human endogenous retrovirus subfamily H (HERVH) is a class of transposable elements expressed preferentially in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Here, we report that the long terminal repeats of HERVH function as enhancers and that HERVH is a nuclear long noncoding RNA required to maintain hESC identity. Furthermore, HERVH is associated with OCT4, coactivators and Mediator subunits. Together, these results uncover a new role of species-specific transposable elements in hESCs." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'L1P4c' belong to?
[ "ERV1", "Alu", "L1", "ERVL-MaLR" ]
L1
Subfamily
Family
L1P4c
L1
[ "LINE-1 (L1) is a mammalian family of highly repeated DNA sequences that are members of a class of transposable elements whose movement involves an RNA intermediate. Both structural and evolutionary data indicate that the L1 family consists of a small number of active transposable elements interspersed with a large number of L1 pseudogenes. In the mouse, the longest, characterized L1 sequences span about 7000 base-pairs and contain two long open reading frames. Two subfamilies of mouse L1 elements, A and F, have been defined on the basis of the type of putative transcriptional regulatory sequence found at the 5' end. In order to identify a transcribed subset of L1 elements in mouse F9 teratocarcinoma cells, we have examined the strand-specificity of L1 transcription by Northern analysis and compared the open reading frame-1 sequences of ten A-type cDNAs with fifteen genomic A-type L1 elements. Transcripts containing A-type sequence are far more abundant than those containing F-type sequence. Although the majority of L1 RNA in F9 cells appears to be transcribed non-specifically from both strands, our results provide evidence for a subpopulation of variable length, strand-specific transcripts arising from A-type transcriptional regulatory sequences. F9 cell cDNA sequences, which share greater than 99.5% sequence identity with one another, represent a homogeneous subset of the genomic L1 population. Examination of genomic mouse L1 sequences reveals three types of length polymorphism in a defined segment of the first open reading frame. Phylogenetic analysis shows a correlation between the type of length polymorphism in the first open reading frame and the relative age of an individual A-type genomic L1 element. Comparison of the cDNA and genomic sequences indicates that the youngest subgroup of A-type L1 elements is preferentially transcribed in F9 cells. This subgroup may be currently dominating the L1 dispersal process in mice.", "A phylogenetic survey using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has identified four major P element subfamilies in the saltans and willistoni species groups of Drosophila. One subfamily, containing about half of the sequences studied, consists of elements that are very similar to the canonical (and active) P element from D. melanogaster. Within this subfamily, nucleotide sequence differentiation among different copies from the same species and among elements from different species is relatively low. This observation suggests that the canonical elements are relatively recent additions to the genome or, less likely, are evolving slowly relative to the other subfamilies. Elements belonging to the three noncanonical lineages are distinct from the canonical elements and from one another. Furthermore, there is considerably more sequence variation, on the average, within the noncanonical subfamilies compared to the canonical elements. Horizontal transfer and the coexistence of multiple, independently evolving element subfamilies in the same genome may explain the distribution of P elements in the saltans and willistoni species groups. Such explanations are not mutually exclusive, and each may be involved to varying degrees in the maintenance of P elements in natural populations of Drosophila.", "L1s are transposable elements that move by a copy-and-paste mechanism that continuously increases their copy number in the genome, such that each genome has a record of the L1 history in that host lineage. They make up about 20% of the genomes of eutherian mammals and have played a major role in shaping genome evolution. Chiroptera has the lowest average genome size among mammalian orders and the only documented case of L1 extinction affecting an entire mammalian family. Herein, L1 activity and extinction are characterized in all families of the order Chiroptera using a method that enriches for the youngest lineages of L1s in the genome. In addition to the previously reported L1 extinction in Pteropodidae, L1 extinction was documented to occur in Mormoops blainvilli, but this event did not affect all species of Mormoopidae. Further, there was no evidence of concordance between the evolution of L1s and their chiropteran host. There were two L1 lineages present before the divergence of all extant bats. Both lineages are extinct in the Pteropodidae. One or the other L1 lineage is extinct in almost all bat families, but Taphozous melanopogon maintains active members of both. Most intriguingly, some families within the Rhinolophoidea retain one active L1 lineage whereas other families retain the other, creating a deep discontinuity between L1 phylogeny and chiropteran phylogeny. These results indicate that there have been numerous losses of active L1 lineages over the history of chiropteran evolution, but that all chiropteran families except Pteropodidae have retained L1 activity." ]
Which family does the class 'DNA' belong to?
[ "ERVK", "TcMar-Tigger", "ERVL-MaLR", "hAT-Charlie" ]
hAT-Charlie
Class
Family
DNA
hAT-Charlie
[ "The higher levels of the classification of transposable elements (TEs) from Classes to Superfamilies or Families, is regularly updated, but the lower levels (below the Family) have received little investigation. In particular, this applies to the Families that include a large number of copies. In this article we propose an automatic classification of DNA sequences. This procedure is based on an aggregation process using a pairwise matrix of distances, allowing us to define several groups characterized by a sphere with a central sequence and a radius. This method was tested on the mariner Family, because this is probably one of the most extensively studied Families. Several Subfamilies had already been defined from phylogenetic analyses based on multiple alignments of complete or partial amino-acid sequences of the transposase. The classification obtained here from DNA sequences of 935 items matches the phylogenies of the transposase. The rate of error from a posteriori re-assignment is relatively low.", "The L family (long interspersed repeated DNA) of mobile genetic elements is a persistent feature of the mammalian genome. In rats, this family contains approximately equal to 40,000 members and accounts for approximately equal to 10% of the haploid genome. We demonstrate here that the guanine-rich homopurine stretches located at the right end of L-DNA induce oligonucleotide uptake by contiguous duplex DNA. The uptake is dependent on negative supercoiling and the length of the homopurine stretch and occurs even when the L-DNA homopurine stretches are introduced into a different DNA environment. The bound oligomer primes DNA synthesis when DNA polymerase and deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates are added, resulting in a faithful copy of the template to which the oligonucleotide had bound. The implications of this property of the L-DNA guanine-rich homopurine stretches in the amplification, recombination, and dispersal of L elements is discussed.", "DNA transposons are ubiquitous components of eukaryotic genomes. Academ superfamily of DNA transposons is one of the least characterized DNA transposon superfamilies in eukaryotes. DNA transposons belonging to the Academ superfamily have been reported from various animals, one red algal species Chondrus crispus, and one fungal species Puccinia graminis. Six Academ families from P. graminis encode a helicase in addition to putative transposase, while some other families encode a single protein which contains a putative transposase and an XPG nuclease. Systematic searches on Repbase and BLAST searches against publicly available genome sequences revealed that several species of fungi and animals contain multiple Academ transposon families encoding a helicase. These AcademH families generate 9 or 10-bp target site duplications (TSDs) while Academ families lacking helicase generate 3 or 4-bp TSDs. Phylogenetic analysis clearly shows two lineages inside of Academ, designated here as AcademH and AcademX for encoding helicase or XPG nuclease, respectively. One sublineage of AcademH in animals encodes plant homeodomain (PHD) finger in its transposase, and its remnants are found in several fish genomes. The AcademH lineage of TEs is widely distributed in animals and fungi, and originated early in the evolution of Academ DNA transposons. This analysis highlights the structural diversity in one less studied superfamily of eukaryotic DNA transposons. © The Author(s) 2020." ]
Which subfamily is in the family 'ERVL'?
[ "LTR41", "MER102a", "Tigger16a", "L1M3f" ]
LTR41
Family
Subfamily
ERVL
LTR41
[ "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "Although the ERVL-mammalian-apparent LTR retrotransposons (MaLRs) are the fourth largest family of transposable elements in the human genome, their evolutionary history and relationship have not been thoroughly studied. In this study, through RepeatMasker annotations of some representative species and construction of phylogenetic tree by sequence similarity, all primate-specific MaLR members are found to descend from MLT1A1 retrotransposon. Comparative genomic analysis, transposition-in-transposition inference, and sequence feature comparisons consistently show that each MaLR member evolved from its predecessor successively and had a limited activity period during primate evolution. Accordingly, a novel MaLR member was discovered as successor of MSTB1 in Tarsiiformes. At last, the identification of candidate precursor and intermediate THE1A elements provides further evidence for the previously proposed arms race model between ZNF430/ZNF100 and THE1B/THE1A. Taken together, this study sheds light on the evolutionary history of MaLRs and can serve as a foundation for future research on their interactions with zinc finger genes, gene regulation, and human health implications. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.", "The human genome harbors numerous distinct families of so-called human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) which are remnants of exogenous retroviruses that entered the germ line millions of years ago. We describe here the hitherto little-characterized betaretrovirus HERV-K(HML-5) family (named HERVK22 in Repbase) in greater detail. Out of 139 proviruses, only a few loci represent full-length proviruses, and many lack gag protease and/or env gene regions. We generated a consensus sequence from multiple alignment of 62 HML-5 loci that displays open reading frames for the four major retroviral proteins. Four HML-5 long terminal repeat (LTR) subfamilies were identified that are associated with monophyletic proviral bodies, implying different evolution of HML-5 LTRs and genes. Sequence analysis indicated that the proviruses formed approximately 55 million years ago. Accordingly, HML-5 proviral sequences were detected in Old World and New World primates but not in prosimians. No recent activity is associated with this HERV family. We also conclude that the HML-5 consensus sequence primer binding site is identical to methionine tRNA. Therefore, the family should be designated HERV-M. Our study provides important insights into the structure and evolution of the oldest betaretrovirus in the primate genome known to date." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'TcMar-Tigger'?
[ "LINE", "LTR", "SINE", "DNA" ]
DNA
Family
Class
TcMar-Tigger
DNA
[ "Tc3 of Caenorhabditis elegans is one of the founding members of the Tc1 family which includes DNA transposons in vertebrates, insects, nematodes and fungi. It is one of the best characterized eukaryotic transposons in terms of structure and transposition mechanism. A Tc3-like transposon MsqTc3 has been recently described in a mosquito. Here we present the characterization of a number of Tc3-like transposons in C. elegans, Caenorhabditis briggsae, and Drosophila melanogaster, which has revealed high levels of inter- and intra-specific diversity and further suggests a broad distribution of the Tc3-like transposons. These newly defined transposons and the previously described Tc3 and MsqTc3 form a highly divergent yet distinct clade in the Tc1 family. The above phylogenetic analysis of the Tc3-like transposons and their high levels of intra-specific diversity underscore interesting questions of their evolutionary dynamics in their respective hosts. The majority of the Tc3-like transposons contain two putative binding sites for their transposases. The first is near the terminus and the second is approximately 164-184 bp from the first site. Comparative analysis suggests that the second binding site may have been maintained for an important function in vivo. There is a large amount of variation in the length (27-566 bp) and structure of the terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) of Tc3-like transposons. Long (318-566 bp) TIRs that extend significantly beyond the second binding site are only found in the first described Tc3 and its close relatives, whose transposases form a recently derived clade among the Tc3-like transposons. Thus, these unique TIRs may have evolved recently together with their corresponding transposases.", "Tc3 is a member of the Tc1/mariner family of transposable elements. All these elements have terminal inverted repeats, encode related transposases and insert exclusively into TA dinucleotides. We have studied the DNA binding properties of Tc3 transposase and found that an N-terminal domain of 65 amino acids binds specifically to two regions within the 462 bp Tc3 inverted repeat; one region is located at the end of the inverted repeat, the other is located approximately 180 bp from the end. Methylation interference experiments indicate that this N-terminal DNA binding domain of the Tc3 transposase interacts with nucleotides on one face of the DNA helix over adjacent major and minor grooves.", "The maT family is a unique clade within the Tc1-mariner superfamily, and their distribution is to date known as being limited to invertebrates. A novel transposon named EamaT1 is described from the genome of the earthworm Eisenia andrei. The full sized EamaT1 was obtained by degenerate and inverse PCR-based amplification. Sequence analysis of multiple copies of the EamaT1, which consisted of 0.9 and 1.4 kb elements, showed that the consensual EamaT1 with inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of 69 bp was 1,422 bp long and flanked by a duplicated TA dinucleotide. The EamaT1 is present in approximately 120-250 copies per diploid genome but undergoes an inactivation process as a result of accumulating multiple mutations and is nonfunctional. The open reading frame (ORF) of the EamaT1 consensus encoding 356 amino acid sequences of transposase contained a DD37D signature and a conserved paired-like DNA binding motif for the transposition mechanism. The result of ITRs comparison confirmed their consensus terminal sequences (5'-CAGGGTG-3') and AT-rich region on the internal bases for ITRs-transposase interaction." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'HUERS-P3-int'?
[ "LTR", "SINE", "DNA", "LINE" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
HUERS-P3-int
LTR
[ "The complete DNA sequence of three independent isolates of Uhu, a member of the Tc1-like class of transposable elements from D. heteroneura (Uhu-1, Uhu-3, and Uhu-4), has been determined. These isolates have between 95 and 96.4% nucleotide sequence identity indicating that Uhu is well conserved within this species. A comparison of the DNA sequences of Uhu and the D. melanogaster Hb1 transposable element shows that the nucleotide substitution rate for Uhu is comparable to the synonymous rate for the Adh gene in these species. Uhu has been identified in four other species of endemic Hawaiian Drosophila, D. silvestris, D. differens, D. planitibia and D. picticornis, and nine Uhu elements were isolated from genomic libraries of these four species. A 444 base pair region from within the coding region of the Uhu element, with well conserved ends, was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction and used for sequence comparison of elements from different species. The analysis of the sequence similarities between the elements within and between the species shows a grouping of the two pairs of most closely related species (D. heteroneura and D. silvestris, and D. differens and D. planitibia), but shows a much larger variation within the most recently diverged species (D. heteroneura and D. silvestris) than expected. There are extensive nucleotide substitutions and deletions in the Uhu elements from D. picticornis showing that they are degenerating and being lost in this species. These observations indicate that the Uhu element has been transmitted vertically and that transposition may have been activated at the time of formation of each species as it colonized the newly formed islands of the Hawaiian archipelago.", "We report the complete nucleotide sequence of the transposable element Uhu from the vicinity of the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene of Drosophila heteroneura (an endemic Hawaiian Drosophila). The complete element is about 1650 base-pairs (bp) long, has 46-50 base-pair inverse imperfect repeats at it's ends, and contains a large open reading frame potentially encoding a 192 amino acid protein. We demonstrate that Uhu belongs to a class of transposable elements which includes Tc1 from Caenorhabditis elegans, Barney from Caenorhabditis briggsae, and HB1 from Drosophila melanogaster. All of these elements share significant sequence similarity, are approximately 1600 base pairs long, have short inverse terminal repeats (ITRs), contain open reading frames (ORFs) with significant sequence identity, and appear to insert specifically at TA sequences generating target site duplications.", "Herves is a functional Class II transposable element in Anopheles gambiae belonging to the hAT superfamily of elements. Class II transposable elements are used as gene vectors in this species and are also being considered as genetic drive agents for spreading desirable genes through natural populations as part of an effort to control malaria transmission. In this study, Herves was investigated in populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s., Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles merus in Mozambique over a period of 2 years. The copy number of Herves within these three species was approximately 5 copies per diploid genome and did not differ among species or between years. Based on the insertion-site occupancy-frequency distribution and existing models of transposable element dynamics, Herves appears to be transpositionally active currently or, at least recently, in all species tested. Ninety-five percent of the individuals within the populations of the three species tested contained intact elements with complete Herves transposase genes and this is consistent with the idea that these elements are currently active." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'ERV1'?
[ "LTR", "LINE", "DNA", "SINE" ]
LTR
Family
Class
ERV1
LTR
[ "Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) represent the inheritance of ancient germ-line cell infections by exogenous retroviruses and the subsequent transmission of the integrated proviruses to the descendants. ERVs have the same internal structure as exogenous retroviruses. While no replication-competent HERVs have been recognized, some retain up to three of four intact ORFs. HERVs have been classified before, with varying scope and depth, notably in the RepBase/RepeatMasker system. However, existing classifications are bewildering. There is a need for a systematic, unifying and simple classification. We strived for a classification which is traceable to previous classifications and which encompasses HERV variation within a limited number of clades. The human genome assembly GRCh 37/hg19 was analyzed with RetroTector, which primarily detects relatively complete Class I and II proviruses. A total of 3173 HERV sequences were identified. The structure of and relations between these proviruses was resolved through a multi-step classification procedure that involved a novel type of similarity image analysis (\"Simage\") which allowed discrimination of heterogeneous (noncanonical) from homogeneous (canonical) HERVs. Of the 3173 HERVs, 1214 were canonical and segregated into 39 canonical clades (groups), belonging to class I (Gamma- and Epsilon-like), II (Beta-like) and III (Spuma-like). The groups were chosen based on (1) sequence (nucleotide and Pol amino acid), similarity, (2) degree of fit to previously published clades, often from RepBase, and (3) taxonomic markers. The groups fell into 11 supergroups. The 1959 noncanonical HERVs contained 31 additional, less well-defined groups. Simage analysis revealed several types of mosaicism, notably recombination and secondary integration. By comparing flanking sequences, LTRs and completeness of gene structure, we deduced that some noncanonical HERVs proliferated after the recombination event. Groups were further divided into envelope subgroups (altogether 94) based on sequence similarity and characteristic \"immunosuppressive domain\" motifs. Intra and inter(super)group, as well as intraclass, recombination involving envelope genes (\"env snatching\") was a common event. LTR divergence indicated that HERV-K(HML2) and HERVFC had the most recent integrations, HERVL and HUERSP3 the oldest. A comprehensive HERV classification and characterization approach was undertaken. It should be applicable for classification of all ERVs. Recombination was common among HERV ancestors.", "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "The genomes of many species are crowded with repetitive mobile sequences. In the case of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) there is, for various reasons, considerable confusion regarding names assigned to families/groups of ERVs as well as individual ERV loci. Human ERVs have been studied in greater detail, and naming of HERVs in the scientific literature is somewhat confusing not just to the outsider. Without guidelines, confusion for ERVs in other species will also probably increase if those ERVs are studied in greater detail. Based on previous experience, this review highlights some of the problems when naming and classifying ERVs, and provides some guidance for detecting and characterizing ERV sequences. Because of the close relationship between ERVs and exogenous retroviruses (XRVs) it is reasonable to reconcile their classification with that of XRVs. We here argue that classification should be based on a combination of similarity, structural features, (inferred) function, and previous nomenclature. Because the RepBase system is widely employed in genome annotation, RepBase designations should be considered in further taxonomic efforts. To lay a foundation for a phylogenetically based taxonomy, further analyses of ERVs in many hosts are needed. A dedicated, permanent, international consortium would best be suited to integrate and communicate our current and future knowledge on repetitive, mobile elements in general to the scientific community." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'Charlie17b'?
[ "LTR", "LINE", "SINE", "DNA" ]
DNA
Subfamily
Class
Charlie17b
DNA
[ "The higher levels of the classification of transposable elements (TEs) from Classes to Superfamilies or Families, is regularly updated, but the lower levels (below the Family) have received little investigation. In particular, this applies to the Families that include a large number of copies. In this article we propose an automatic classification of DNA sequences. This procedure is based on an aggregation process using a pairwise matrix of distances, allowing us to define several groups characterized by a sphere with a central sequence and a radius. This method was tested on the mariner Family, because this is probably one of the most extensively studied Families. Several Subfamilies had already been defined from phylogenetic analyses based on multiple alignments of complete or partial amino-acid sequences of the transposase. The classification obtained here from DNA sequences of 935 items matches the phylogenies of the transposase. The rate of error from a posteriori re-assignment is relatively low.", "Group II introns are catalytic RNAs and mobile genetic elements. Phylogenetic characterization of group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptases (RTs) established seven classes: the mitochondrial class, chloroplast-like classes 1 and 2, and bacterial classes A, B, C, and D. In this study, we identified and characterized a new bacterial class of group II introns, bacterial class E, on the basis of phylogenetic analysis of the intron-encoded protein (IEP) RT and determination of a consensus intron RNA structure.", "We have identified two repetitive element families in the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae with extensive sequence identity to the Caenorhabditis elegans transposable element Tc1. Five members each of the TCb1 (previously known as Barney) and TCb2 families were isolated by hybridization to a Tc1 probe. Tc1-hybridizing repetitive elements were grouped into either the TCb1 or TCb2 family based on cross-hybridization intensities among the C. briggsae elements. The genomic copy number of the TCb1 family is 15 and the TCb2 family copy number is 33 in the C. briggsae strain G16. The two transposable element families show numerous genomic hybridization pattern differences between two C. briggsae strains, suggestive of transpositional activity. Two members of the TCb1 family, TCb1#5 and TCb1#10, were sequenced. Each of these two elements had suffered an independent single large deletion. TCb1#5 had a 627-bp internal deletion and TCb1#10 had lost 316 bp of one end. The two sequenced TCb1 elements were highly conserved over the sequences they shared. A 1616-bp composite TCb1 element was constructed from TCb1#5 and TCb1#10. The composite TCb1 element has 80-bp terminal inverted repeats with three nucleotide mismatches and two open reading frames (ORFs) on opposite strands. TCb1 and the 1610-bp Tc1 share 58% overall nucleotide sequence identity, and the greatest similarity occurs in their ORF1 and inverted repeat termini." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'LTR60' belong to?
[ "hAT-Charlie", "Gypsy", "L1", "ERV1" ]
ERV1
Subfamily
Family
LTR60
ERV1
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "Long terminal retrotransposons are major components of eukaryotic transposable elements. We have surveyed the long terminal repeats (LTR) retrotransposons of domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori) by mining the data produced by Bombyx mori Genome Sequencing Project. At least 29 separate families of LTR retrotransposons are identified in this survey, comprising of 11.8% of the complete sequence. Families of domesticated silkworm LTR retrotransposons can be mainly classified into three groups: gypsy-like, copia-like, Pao-Bel. Fourteen families identified consist of gypsy-like elements, four families consist of copia-like elements and seven families consist of Pao-Bel elements. In addition to the three groups of LTR retrotransposons, two families of unusual non-coding elements are identified in the genome of this species. Further phylogenetic analysis of RT domain indicates that the elements of B.mori show high diversity and can form different clades in each group. An analysis of sequence variation from different families reveals distinct patterns of variation for the elements belonging to three groups. The analysis of the domesticated silkworm LTR retrotransposons should assist in our understanding of the roles of retroelement in lepidopteron insect genome evolution.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a large group of transposable elements that replicate through an RNA intermediate and alter genome structure. The activities of LTR-RTs in plant genomes provide helpful information about genome evolution and gene function. LTR-RTs near or within genes can directly alter gene function. This work introduces PlantLTRdb, an intact LTR-RT database for 195 plant species. Using homology- and de novo structure-based methods, a total of 150.18 Gbp representing 3,079,469 pseudomolecules/scaffolds were analyzed to identify, characterize, annotate LTR-RTs, estimate insertion ages, detect LTR-RT-gene chimeras, and determine nearby genes. Accordingly, 520,194 intact LTR-RTs were discovered, including 29,462 autonomous and 490,732 nonautonomous LTR-RTs. The autonomous LTR-RTs included 10,286 Gypsy and 19,176 Copia, while the nonautonomous were divided into 224,906 Gypsy, 218,414 Copia, 1,768 BARE-2, 3,147 TR-GAG and 4,2497 unknown. Analysis of the identified LTR-RTs located within genes showed that a total of 36,236 LTR-RTs were LTR-RT-gene chimeras and 11,619 LTR-RTs were within pseudo-genes. In addition, 50,026 genes are within 1 kbp of LTR-RTs, and 250,587 had a distance of 1 to 10 kbp from LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb allows researchers to search, visualize, BLAST and analyze plant LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb can contribute to the understanding of structural variations, genome organization, functional genomics, and the development of LTR-RT target markers for molecular plant breeding. PlantLTRdb is available at https://bioinformatics.um6p.ma/PlantLTRdb. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar, Alsamman and El Allali." ]
Which subfamily does the class 'LTR' belong to?
[ "MER20B", "HERVKC4-int", "MER91B", "LTR28C" ]
LTR28C
Class
Subfamily
LTR
LTR28C
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are a class of eukaryotic mobile elements characterized by a distinctive sequence similarity-based structure. Hence they are well suited for computational identification. Current software allows for a comprehensive genome-wide de novo detection of such elements. The obvious next step is the classification of newly detected candidates resulting in (super-)families. Such a de novo classification approach based on sequence-based clustering of transposon features has been proposed before, resulting in a preliminary assignment of candidates to families as a basis for subsequent manual refinement. However, such a classification workflow is typically split across a heterogeneous set of glue scripts and generic software (for example, spreadsheets), making it tedious for a human expert to inspect, curate and export the putative families produced by the workflow. We have developed LTRsift, an interactive graphical software tool for semi-automatic postprocessing of de novo predicted LTR retrotransposon annotations. Its user-friendly interface offers customizable filtering and classification functionality, displaying the putative candidate groups, their members and their internal structure in a hierarchical fashion. To ease manual work, it also supports graphical user interface-driven reassignment, splitting and further annotation of candidates. Export of grouped candidate sets in standard formats is possible. In two case studies, we demonstrate how LTRsift can be employed in the context of a genome-wide LTR retrotransposon survey effort. LTRsift is a useful and convenient tool for semi-automated classification of newly detected LTR retrotransposons based on their internal features. Its efficient implementation allows for convenient and seamless filtering and classification in an integrated environment. Developed for life scientists, it is helpful in postprocessing and refining the output of software for predicting LTR retrotransposons up to the stage of preparing full-length reference sequence libraries. The LTRsift software is freely available at http://www.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/LTRsift under an open-source license.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a class of RNA-replicating transposon elements (TEs) that can alter genome structure and function by moving positions, repositioning genes, shifting exons, and causing chromosomal rearrangements. LTR-RTs are widespread in many plant genomes and constitute a significant portion of the genome. Their movement and activity in eukaryotic genomes can provide insight into genome evolution and gene function, especially when LTR-RTs are located near or within genes. Building the redundant and non-redundant LTR-RTs libraries and their annotations for species lacking this resource requires extensive bioinformatics pipelines and expensive computing power to analyze large amounts of genomic data. This increases the need for online services that provide computational resources with minimal overhead and maximum efficiency. Here, we present MegaLTR as a web server and standalone pipeline that detects intact LTR-RTs at the whole-genome level and integrates multiple tools for structure-based, homologybased, and de novo identification, classification, annotation, insertion time determination, and LTR-RT gene chimera analysis. MegaLTR also provides statistical analysis and visualization with multiple tools and can be used to accelerate plant species discovery and assist breeding programs in their efforts to improve genomic resources. We hope that the development of online services such as MegaLTR, which can analyze large amounts of genomic data, will become increasingly important for the automated detection and annotation of LTR-RT elements. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar and El Allali." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'MER135'?
[ "LINE", "SINE", "LTR", "DNA" ]
DNA
Subfamily
Class
MER135
DNA
[ "We report a new medium reiteration frequency repeat MER53 present in human and mammalian genomes. A 189 bp MER53 consensus sequence has been reconstructed based on the computer analysis of GenBank sequences. TA target site duplication and terminal inverted repeats indicate that the MER53 repeat is a non-autonomous DNA transposon related to the mariner family. Two MER53 repeats were found integrated within different mobile elements. We have found that most of the genes harboring the MER53 repeat are involved in the host defense system. The reasons for this non-random distribution of the repeat are discussed.", "Mariner-like elements (MLE) are members from class II of transposable elements also known as DNA transposons. These elements have a wide distribution among different groups of organisms, including insects, which can be explained by horizontal and vertical gene-transfer. MLE families have been described in tephritid flies and other genera. During screening for Wolbachia bacteria in fruit flies of the genus Anastrepha, we discovered two sequences related to mariner-like elements. Based on these sequences, we designed primers that allowed us to isolate and characterize two new mariner-like elements (Anmar1 and Anmar2) in Anastrepha flies. These elements, which belong to the mellifera and rosa subfamilies have a low nucleotide diversity, and are probably inactive and acquired by vertical transfer. This is the first report of mariner-like transposons in flies found in South America.", "Mariner-like elements (MLE) are Class II transposable elements that are very widespread among eukaryotic genomes. One MLE belonging to the mauritiana subfamily, named Botmar1, has been identified in the genome of the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris. gDNA hybridization with the Botmar1 transposase ORF revealed that about 230 elements are present in each haploid genome of B. terrestris that consist entirely of 1.3- and 0.85-kbp elements. The analysis of their sequences revealed that there are two Botmar1 subfamilies of similar ages in the Bombus terrestris genome: one is composed entirely of 1.3-kpb elements, whereas the second comprises both completed and deleted elements. Our previous data indicated that the internally deleted form, which correspond to the 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements occur in other distantly related hymenopteran genomes. Because the presence of similar 1.3- and 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements in some distantly related hymenopteran species cannot be explained by horizontal transfers, the nucleic acid sequence properties of these elements were further investigated. We found that certain structural properties in their nucleic acid sequence might explain the occurrence of 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements presenting similarly located internal deletions in hymenopteran genomes." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'HUERS-P3-int'?
[ "SINE", "LTR", "LINE", "DNA" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
HUERS-P3-int
LTR
[ "The complete DNA sequence of three independent isolates of Uhu, a member of the Tc1-like class of transposable elements from D. heteroneura (Uhu-1, Uhu-3, and Uhu-4), has been determined. These isolates have between 95 and 96.4% nucleotide sequence identity indicating that Uhu is well conserved within this species. A comparison of the DNA sequences of Uhu and the D. melanogaster Hb1 transposable element shows that the nucleotide substitution rate for Uhu is comparable to the synonymous rate for the Adh gene in these species. Uhu has been identified in four other species of endemic Hawaiian Drosophila, D. silvestris, D. differens, D. planitibia and D. picticornis, and nine Uhu elements were isolated from genomic libraries of these four species. A 444 base pair region from within the coding region of the Uhu element, with well conserved ends, was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction and used for sequence comparison of elements from different species. The analysis of the sequence similarities between the elements within and between the species shows a grouping of the two pairs of most closely related species (D. heteroneura and D. silvestris, and D. differens and D. planitibia), but shows a much larger variation within the most recently diverged species (D. heteroneura and D. silvestris) than expected. There are extensive nucleotide substitutions and deletions in the Uhu elements from D. picticornis showing that they are degenerating and being lost in this species. These observations indicate that the Uhu element has been transmitted vertically and that transposition may have been activated at the time of formation of each species as it colonized the newly formed islands of the Hawaiian archipelago.", "We report the complete nucleotide sequence of the transposable element Uhu from the vicinity of the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene of Drosophila heteroneura (an endemic Hawaiian Drosophila). The complete element is about 1650 base-pairs (bp) long, has 46-50 base-pair inverse imperfect repeats at it's ends, and contains a large open reading frame potentially encoding a 192 amino acid protein. We demonstrate that Uhu belongs to a class of transposable elements which includes Tc1 from Caenorhabditis elegans, Barney from Caenorhabditis briggsae, and HB1 from Drosophila melanogaster. All of these elements share significant sequence similarity, are approximately 1600 base pairs long, have short inverse terminal repeats (ITRs), contain open reading frames (ORFs) with significant sequence identity, and appear to insert specifically at TA sequences generating target site duplications.", "Herves is a functional Class II transposable element in Anopheles gambiae belonging to the hAT superfamily of elements. Class II transposable elements are used as gene vectors in this species and are also being considered as genetic drive agents for spreading desirable genes through natural populations as part of an effort to control malaria transmission. In this study, Herves was investigated in populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s., Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles merus in Mozambique over a period of 2 years. The copy number of Herves within these three species was approximately 5 copies per diploid genome and did not differ among species or between years. Based on the insertion-site occupancy-frequency distribution and existing models of transposable element dynamics, Herves appears to be transpositionally active currently or, at least recently, in all species tested. Ninety-five percent of the individuals within the populations of the three species tested contained intact elements with complete Herves transposase genes and this is consistent with the idea that these elements are currently active." ]
Which subfamily is in the family 'ERVL'?
[ "LTR50", "LTR10F", "LTR16A2", "HERVE-int" ]
LTR16A2
Family
Subfamily
ERVL
LTR16A2
[ "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "Although the ERVL-mammalian-apparent LTR retrotransposons (MaLRs) are the fourth largest family of transposable elements in the human genome, their evolutionary history and relationship have not been thoroughly studied. In this study, through RepeatMasker annotations of some representative species and construction of phylogenetic tree by sequence similarity, all primate-specific MaLR members are found to descend from MLT1A1 retrotransposon. Comparative genomic analysis, transposition-in-transposition inference, and sequence feature comparisons consistently show that each MaLR member evolved from its predecessor successively and had a limited activity period during primate evolution. Accordingly, a novel MaLR member was discovered as successor of MSTB1 in Tarsiiformes. At last, the identification of candidate precursor and intermediate THE1A elements provides further evidence for the previously proposed arms race model between ZNF430/ZNF100 and THE1B/THE1A. Taken together, this study sheds light on the evolutionary history of MaLRs and can serve as a foundation for future research on their interactions with zinc finger genes, gene regulation, and human health implications. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.", "The human genome harbors numerous distinct families of so-called human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) which are remnants of exogenous retroviruses that entered the germ line millions of years ago. We describe here the hitherto little-characterized betaretrovirus HERV-K(HML-5) family (named HERVK22 in Repbase) in greater detail. Out of 139 proviruses, only a few loci represent full-length proviruses, and many lack gag protease and/or env gene regions. We generated a consensus sequence from multiple alignment of 62 HML-5 loci that displays open reading frames for the four major retroviral proteins. Four HML-5 long terminal repeat (LTR) subfamilies were identified that are associated with monophyletic proviral bodies, implying different evolution of HML-5 LTRs and genes. Sequence analysis indicated that the proviruses formed approximately 55 million years ago. Accordingly, HML-5 proviral sequences were detected in Old World and New World primates but not in prosimians. No recent activity is associated with this HERV family. We also conclude that the HML-5 consensus sequence primer binding site is identical to methionine tRNA. Therefore, the family should be designated HERV-M. Our study provides important insights into the structure and evolution of the oldest betaretrovirus in the primate genome known to date." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'HUERS-P2-int'?
[ "SINE", "DNA", "LINE", "LTR" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
HUERS-P2-int
LTR
[ "The complete DNA sequence of three independent isolates of Uhu, a member of the Tc1-like class of transposable elements from D. heteroneura (Uhu-1, Uhu-3, and Uhu-4), has been determined. These isolates have between 95 and 96.4% nucleotide sequence identity indicating that Uhu is well conserved within this species. A comparison of the DNA sequences of Uhu and the D. melanogaster Hb1 transposable element shows that the nucleotide substitution rate for Uhu is comparable to the synonymous rate for the Adh gene in these species. Uhu has been identified in four other species of endemic Hawaiian Drosophila, D. silvestris, D. differens, D. planitibia and D. picticornis, and nine Uhu elements were isolated from genomic libraries of these four species. A 444 base pair region from within the coding region of the Uhu element, with well conserved ends, was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction and used for sequence comparison of elements from different species. The analysis of the sequence similarities between the elements within and between the species shows a grouping of the two pairs of most closely related species (D. heteroneura and D. silvestris, and D. differens and D. planitibia), but shows a much larger variation within the most recently diverged species (D. heteroneura and D. silvestris) than expected. There are extensive nucleotide substitutions and deletions in the Uhu elements from D. picticornis showing that they are degenerating and being lost in this species. These observations indicate that the Uhu element has been transmitted vertically and that transposition may have been activated at the time of formation of each species as it colonized the newly formed islands of the Hawaiian archipelago.", "We report the complete nucleotide sequence of the transposable element Uhu from the vicinity of the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene of Drosophila heteroneura (an endemic Hawaiian Drosophila). The complete element is about 1650 base-pairs (bp) long, has 46-50 base-pair inverse imperfect repeats at it's ends, and contains a large open reading frame potentially encoding a 192 amino acid protein. We demonstrate that Uhu belongs to a class of transposable elements which includes Tc1 from Caenorhabditis elegans, Barney from Caenorhabditis briggsae, and HB1 from Drosophila melanogaster. All of these elements share significant sequence similarity, are approximately 1600 base pairs long, have short inverse terminal repeats (ITRs), contain open reading frames (ORFs) with significant sequence identity, and appear to insert specifically at TA sequences generating target site duplications.", "HUH endonucleases of the Rep (replication protein) class mediate the replication of highly diverse plasmids and viral genomes across all domains of life. HUH transposases have independently evolved from Reps, giving rise to three major transposable element groups: the prokaryotic insertion sequences IS200/IS605 and IS91/ISCR, and the eukaryotic Helitrons. Here, I present Replitrons, a second group of eukaryotic transposons encoding Rep HUH endonuclease. Replitron transposases feature a Rep domain with one catalytic Tyr (Y1) and an adjacent domain that may function in oligomerization, contrasting with Helitron transposases that feature Rep with two Tyr (Y2) and a fused helicase domain (i.e., RepHel). Protein clustering found no link between Replitron transposases and described HUH transposases, and instead recovered a weak association with Reps of circular Rep-encoding single-stranded (CRESS) DNA viruses and their related plasmids (pCRESS). The predicted tertiary structure of the transposase of Replitron-1, the founding member of the group that is active in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, closely resembles that of CRESS-DNA viruses and other HUH endonucleases. Replitrons are present in at least three eukaryotic supergroups and reach high copy numbers in nonseed plant genomes. Replitron DNA sequences feature short direct repeats at, or potentially near, their termini. Finally, I characterize copy-and-paste de novo insertions of Replitron-1 using long-read sequencing of C. reinhardtii experimental lines. These results support an ancient and evolutionarily independent origin of Replitrons, in line with other major groups of eukaryotic transposons. This work expands the known diversity of both transposons and HUH endonucleases in eukaryotes." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'LTR1B1'?
[ "LINE", "SINE", "DNA", "LTR" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
LTR1B1
LTR
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "LINE-1 (L1) is a mammalian family of highly repeated DNA sequences that are members of a class of transposable elements whose movement involves an RNA intermediate. Both structural and evolutionary data indicate that the L1 family consists of a small number of active transposable elements interspersed with a large number of L1 pseudogenes. In the mouse, the longest, characterized L1 sequences span about 7000 base-pairs and contain two long open reading frames. Two subfamilies of mouse L1 elements, A and F, have been defined on the basis of the type of putative transcriptional regulatory sequence found at the 5' end. In order to identify a transcribed subset of L1 elements in mouse F9 teratocarcinoma cells, we have examined the strand-specificity of L1 transcription by Northern analysis and compared the open reading frame-1 sequences of ten A-type cDNAs with fifteen genomic A-type L1 elements. Transcripts containing A-type sequence are far more abundant than those containing F-type sequence. Although the majority of L1 RNA in F9 cells appears to be transcribed non-specifically from both strands, our results provide evidence for a subpopulation of variable length, strand-specific transcripts arising from A-type transcriptional regulatory sequences. F9 cell cDNA sequences, which share greater than 99.5% sequence identity with one another, represent a homogeneous subset of the genomic L1 population. Examination of genomic mouse L1 sequences reveals three types of length polymorphism in a defined segment of the first open reading frame. Phylogenetic analysis shows a correlation between the type of length polymorphism in the first open reading frame and the relative age of an individual A-type genomic L1 element. Comparison of the cDNA and genomic sequences indicates that the youngest subgroup of A-type L1 elements is preferentially transcribed in F9 cells. This subgroup may be currently dominating the L1 dispersal process in mice.", "The human CD1 proteins belong to a lipid-glycolipid antigen-presenting gene family and are related in structure and function to the MHC class I molecules. Previous mapping and DNA hybridization studies have shown that five linked genes located within a cluster on human chromosome 1q22-23 encode the CD1 protein family. We have analyzed the complete genomic sequence of the human CD1 gene cluster and found that the five active genes are distributed over 175,600 nucleotides and separated by four expanded intervening genomic regions (IGRs) ranging in length between 20 and 68 kb. The IGRs are composed mostly of retroelements including five full-length L1 PA sequences and various pseudogenes. Some L1 sequences have acted as receptors for other subtypes or families of retroelements. Alu molecular clocks that have evolved during primate history are found distributed within the HLA class I duplicated segments (duplicons) but not within the duplicons of CD1. Phylogeny of the alpha3 domain of the class I-like superfamily of proteins shows that the CD1 cluster is well separated from HLA class I by a number of superfamily members including MIC (PERB11), HFE, Zn-alpha2-GP, FcRn, and MR1. Phylogenetically, the human CD1 sequences are interspersed by CD1 sequences from other mammalian species, whereas the human HLA class I sequences cluster together and are separated from the other mammalian sequences. Genomic and phylogenetic analyses support the view that the human CD1 gene copies were duplicated prior to the evolution of primates and the bulk of the HLA class I genes found in humans. In contrast to the HLA class I genomic structure, the human CD1 duplicons are smaller in size, they lack Alu clocks, and they are interrupted by IGRs at least 4 to 14 times longer than the CD1 genes themselves. The IGRs seem to have been created as \"buffer zones\" to protect the CD1 genes from disruption by transposable elements." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'LTR13A' belong to?
[ "ERVL-MaLR", "ERVL", "ERVK", "hAT-Charlie" ]
ERVK
Subfamily
Family
LTR13A
ERVK
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "Although the ERVL-mammalian-apparent LTR retrotransposons (MaLRs) are the fourth largest family of transposable elements in the human genome, their evolutionary history and relationship have not been thoroughly studied. In this study, through RepeatMasker annotations of some representative species and construction of phylogenetic tree by sequence similarity, all primate-specific MaLR members are found to descend from MLT1A1 retrotransposon. Comparative genomic analysis, transposition-in-transposition inference, and sequence feature comparisons consistently show that each MaLR member evolved from its predecessor successively and had a limited activity period during primate evolution. Accordingly, a novel MaLR member was discovered as successor of MSTB1 in Tarsiiformes. At last, the identification of candidate precursor and intermediate THE1A elements provides further evidence for the previously proposed arms race model between ZNF430/ZNF100 and THE1B/THE1A. Taken together, this study sheds light on the evolutionary history of MaLRs and can serve as a foundation for future research on their interactions with zinc finger genes, gene regulation, and human health implications. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.", "Over a hundred families of non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons (non-LTRs) were found in the newly released Anopheles gambiae genome assembly during a reiterative and comprehensive search using the conserved reverse transcriptase (RT) domains of known non-LTRs as the starting queries. These families, which are defined by at least 20% amino acid sequence divergence in their RT domains, range from a few to approximately 2,000 copies and occupy at least 3% of the genome. In addition to having an unprecedented number of diverse families, A. gambiae non-LTRs represent 8 of the 15 previously defined clades plus two novel clades, Loner and Outcast, more than what has been reported for any genome. Five families were found belonging to the L1 clade, which had no invertebrate representatives to date. One unique family named Sponge contains only a complete open reading frame (ORF) for the Gag-like protein and appears to have been mobilized by a family of the CR1 clade. Although most families appear to be inactive as expected, all clades except R4 have families with characteristics suggesting recent activity. At least 21 families have multiple full-length copies with over 99% nucleotide identity and some or all of the following characteristics: target site duplications (TSDs), intact ORFs, and corresponding expressed sequence tags (ESTs). The incredible diversity and the maintenance of multiple recently active lineages within different clades indicate a complex evolutionary scenario. A. gambiae non-LTRs have the potential to be developed as tools for population genetic studies and genetic manipulations of this primary vector of the devastating disease malaria. The semi-automated reiterative search approach described here may be used with any genome assembly to systematically survey and characterize non-LTRs as well as other transposable elements that encode a conserved protein." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'LTR22A' belong to?
[ "TcMar-Tigger", "DNA", "ERVK", "ERV1" ]
ERVK
Subfamily
Family
LTR22A
ERVK
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a large group of transposable elements that replicate through an RNA intermediate and alter genome structure. The activities of LTR-RTs in plant genomes provide helpful information about genome evolution and gene function. LTR-RTs near or within genes can directly alter gene function. This work introduces PlantLTRdb, an intact LTR-RT database for 195 plant species. Using homology- and de novo structure-based methods, a total of 150.18 Gbp representing 3,079,469 pseudomolecules/scaffolds were analyzed to identify, characterize, annotate LTR-RTs, estimate insertion ages, detect LTR-RT-gene chimeras, and determine nearby genes. Accordingly, 520,194 intact LTR-RTs were discovered, including 29,462 autonomous and 490,732 nonautonomous LTR-RTs. The autonomous LTR-RTs included 10,286 Gypsy and 19,176 Copia, while the nonautonomous were divided into 224,906 Gypsy, 218,414 Copia, 1,768 BARE-2, 3,147 TR-GAG and 4,2497 unknown. Analysis of the identified LTR-RTs located within genes showed that a total of 36,236 LTR-RTs were LTR-RT-gene chimeras and 11,619 LTR-RTs were within pseudo-genes. In addition, 50,026 genes are within 1 kbp of LTR-RTs, and 250,587 had a distance of 1 to 10 kbp from LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb allows researchers to search, visualize, BLAST and analyze plant LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb can contribute to the understanding of structural variations, genome organization, functional genomics, and the development of LTR-RT target markers for molecular plant breeding. PlantLTRdb is available at https://bioinformatics.um6p.ma/PlantLTRdb. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar, Alsamman and El Allali.", "Over a hundred families of non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons (non-LTRs) were found in the newly released Anopheles gambiae genome assembly during a reiterative and comprehensive search using the conserved reverse transcriptase (RT) domains of known non-LTRs as the starting queries. These families, which are defined by at least 20% amino acid sequence divergence in their RT domains, range from a few to approximately 2,000 copies and occupy at least 3% of the genome. In addition to having an unprecedented number of diverse families, A. gambiae non-LTRs represent 8 of the 15 previously defined clades plus two novel clades, Loner and Outcast, more than what has been reported for any genome. Five families were found belonging to the L1 clade, which had no invertebrate representatives to date. One unique family named Sponge contains only a complete open reading frame (ORF) for the Gag-like protein and appears to have been mobilized by a family of the CR1 clade. Although most families appear to be inactive as expected, all clades except R4 have families with characteristics suggesting recent activity. At least 21 families have multiple full-length copies with over 99% nucleotide identity and some or all of the following characteristics: target site duplications (TSDs), intact ORFs, and corresponding expressed sequence tags (ESTs). The incredible diversity and the maintenance of multiple recently active lineages within different clades indicate a complex evolutionary scenario. A. gambiae non-LTRs have the potential to be developed as tools for population genetic studies and genetic manipulations of this primary vector of the devastating disease malaria. The semi-automated reiterative search approach described here may be used with any genome assembly to systematically survey and characterize non-LTRs as well as other transposable elements that encode a conserved protein." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'ERV1'?
[ "LINE", "LTR", "DNA", "SINE" ]
LTR
Family
Class
ERV1
LTR
[ "Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) represent the inheritance of ancient germ-line cell infections by exogenous retroviruses and the subsequent transmission of the integrated proviruses to the descendants. ERVs have the same internal structure as exogenous retroviruses. While no replication-competent HERVs have been recognized, some retain up to three of four intact ORFs. HERVs have been classified before, with varying scope and depth, notably in the RepBase/RepeatMasker system. However, existing classifications are bewildering. There is a need for a systematic, unifying and simple classification. We strived for a classification which is traceable to previous classifications and which encompasses HERV variation within a limited number of clades. The human genome assembly GRCh 37/hg19 was analyzed with RetroTector, which primarily detects relatively complete Class I and II proviruses. A total of 3173 HERV sequences were identified. The structure of and relations between these proviruses was resolved through a multi-step classification procedure that involved a novel type of similarity image analysis (\"Simage\") which allowed discrimination of heterogeneous (noncanonical) from homogeneous (canonical) HERVs. Of the 3173 HERVs, 1214 were canonical and segregated into 39 canonical clades (groups), belonging to class I (Gamma- and Epsilon-like), II (Beta-like) and III (Spuma-like). The groups were chosen based on (1) sequence (nucleotide and Pol amino acid), similarity, (2) degree of fit to previously published clades, often from RepBase, and (3) taxonomic markers. The groups fell into 11 supergroups. The 1959 noncanonical HERVs contained 31 additional, less well-defined groups. Simage analysis revealed several types of mosaicism, notably recombination and secondary integration. By comparing flanking sequences, LTRs and completeness of gene structure, we deduced that some noncanonical HERVs proliferated after the recombination event. Groups were further divided into envelope subgroups (altogether 94) based on sequence similarity and characteristic \"immunosuppressive domain\" motifs. Intra and inter(super)group, as well as intraclass, recombination involving envelope genes (\"env snatching\") was a common event. LTR divergence indicated that HERV-K(HML2) and HERVFC had the most recent integrations, HERVL and HUERSP3 the oldest. A comprehensive HERV classification and characterization approach was undertaken. It should be applicable for classification of all ERVs. Recombination was common among HERV ancestors.", "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "The genomes of many species are crowded with repetitive mobile sequences. In the case of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) there is, for various reasons, considerable confusion regarding names assigned to families/groups of ERVs as well as individual ERV loci. Human ERVs have been studied in greater detail, and naming of HERVs in the scientific literature is somewhat confusing not just to the outsider. Without guidelines, confusion for ERVs in other species will also probably increase if those ERVs are studied in greater detail. Based on previous experience, this review highlights some of the problems when naming and classifying ERVs, and provides some guidance for detecting and characterizing ERV sequences. Because of the close relationship between ERVs and exogenous retroviruses (XRVs) it is reasonable to reconcile their classification with that of XRVs. We here argue that classification should be based on a combination of similarity, structural features, (inferred) function, and previous nomenclature. Because the RepBase system is widely employed in genome annotation, RepBase designations should be considered in further taxonomic efforts. To lay a foundation for a phylogenetically based taxonomy, further analyses of ERVs in many hosts are needed. A dedicated, permanent, international consortium would best be suited to integrate and communicate our current and future knowledge on repetitive, mobile elements in general to the scientific community." ]
Which subfamily is in the family 'ERVK'?
[ "LTR75B", "LTR13A", "LTR38A1", "Charlie13b" ]
LTR13A
Family
Subfamily
ERVK
LTR13A
[ "The human genome harbors numerous distinct families of so-called human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) which are remnants of exogenous retroviruses that entered the germ line millions of years ago. We describe here the hitherto little-characterized betaretrovirus HERV-K(HML-5) family (named HERVK22 in Repbase) in greater detail. Out of 139 proviruses, only a few loci represent full-length proviruses, and many lack gag protease and/or env gene regions. We generated a consensus sequence from multiple alignment of 62 HML-5 loci that displays open reading frames for the four major retroviral proteins. Four HML-5 long terminal repeat (LTR) subfamilies were identified that are associated with monophyletic proviral bodies, implying different evolution of HML-5 LTRs and genes. Sequence analysis indicated that the proviruses formed approximately 55 million years ago. Accordingly, HML-5 proviral sequences were detected in Old World and New World primates but not in prosimians. No recent activity is associated with this HERV family. We also conclude that the HML-5 consensus sequence primer binding site is identical to methionine tRNA. Therefore, the family should be designated HERV-M. Our study provides important insights into the structure and evolution of the oldest betaretrovirus in the primate genome known to date.", "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "A substantial amount of the human genome is composed of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs). Manifold HERV families have been identified, among them several so-called HERV-K(HML) families. Although the HERV-K(HML-2) family has been studied in detail, other HERV-K families are not as well characterized. We describe here the HERV-K HML-3 family in more detail. We estimate that there are about 140 proviral loci or remains of such per haploid genome. Most loci are severely mutated. Proviruses displaying larger deletions in gag and pol are common. A multiple alignment of 73 HERV-K(HML-3) sequences displays several potentially important differences compared with the HERVK9I sequence in Repbase. A consensus sequence with open reading frames for all retroviral genes was generated, for which intact dUTPase motifs and env gene variants with different coding capacities are observed. Phylogenetic analysis shows near-monophyly with distinction of two closely related subgroups. Proviruses formed about 36 million years ago. However, no continuous activity through primate evolution is indicated." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'ERVL'?
[ "SINE", "LINE", "LTR", "DNA" ]
LTR
Family
Class
ERVL
LTR
[ "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), or LTR retrotransposons, are a class of transposable elements that are highly represented in mammalian genomes. Human ERVs (HERVs) make up roughly 8.3% of the genome and over the course of evolution, HERV elements underwent positive selection and accrued mutations that rendered them non-infectious; thereby, the genome could co-opt them into constructive roles with important biological functions. In the past two decades, with the help of advances in sequencing technology, ERVs are increasingly considered to be important components of the innate immune response. While typically silenced, expression of HERVs can be induced in response to traumatic, toxic, or infection-related stress, leading to a buildup of viral transcripts and under certain circumstances, proteins, including functionally active reverse transcriptase and viral envelopes. The biological activity of HERVs in the context of the innate immune response can be based on the functional effect of four major viral components: (1) HERV LTRs, (2) HERV-derived RNAs, (3) HERV-derived RNA:DNA duplexes and cDNA, and (4) HERV-derived proteins and ribonucleoprotein complexes. In this review, we will discuss the implications of HERVs in all four contexts in relation to innate immunity and their association with various pathological disease states.", "Human endogenous retrovirus subfamily H (HERVH) is a class of transposable elements expressed preferentially in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Here, we report that the long terminal repeats of HERVH function as enhancers and that HERVH is a nuclear long noncoding RNA required to maintain hESC identity. Furthermore, HERVH is associated with OCT4, coactivators and Mediator subunits. Together, these results uncover a new role of species-specific transposable elements in hESCs." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'hAT-Tip100'?
[ "SINE", "LTR", "LINE", "DNA" ]
DNA
Family
Class
hAT-Tip100
DNA
[ "Tip100 is an Ac-like transposable element that belongs to the hAT superfamily. First discovered in Ipomoea purpurea (common morning glory), it was classified as an autonomous element capable of movement within the genome. As Tip100 data were already available in databases, the sequences of related elements in ten additional species of Ipomoea and five commercial varieties were isolated and analyzed. Evolutionary analysis based on sequence diversity in nuclear ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS), was also applied to compare the evolution of these elements with that of Tip100 in the Ipomoea genus. Tip100 sequences were found in I. purpurea, I. nil, I. indica and I. alba, all of which showed high levels of similarity. The results of phylogenetic analysis of transposon sequences were congruent with the phylogenetic topology obtained for ITS sequences, thereby demonstrating that Tip100 is restricted to a particular group of species within Ipomoea. We hypothesize that Tip100 was probably acquired from a common ancestor and has been transmitted vertically within this genus.", "The hAT family is a group of transposable elements of the terminal inverted repeat class, which includes Ac of maize, hobo of Drosophila and Tam3 of Antirrhinum (snapdragon). All the members of this family so far examined are known to comprise complete and defective copies, with a good correspondence to autonomous and non-autonomous elements, respectively. Internal deletion is the most common cause of defective copies. Tol2, a transposable element of the medaka fish Oryzias latipes, is a member of the hAT family. We examined, mainly by the genomic Southern blot analysis, variation in the structure of copies of this element, and revealed that there are few or no internally deleted copies. This situation is unusual in a member of the hAT family. Possible causes of this anomaly are discussed.", "The hAT transposons, very abundant in all kingdoms, have a common evolutionary origin probably predating the plant-fungi-animal divergence. In this paper we present their general characteristics. Members of this superfamily belong to Class II transposable elements. hAT elements share transposase, short terminal inverted repeats and eight base-pairs duplication of genomic target. We focus on hAT elements in Drosophila, especially hobo. Its distribution, dynamics and impact on genome restructuring in laboratory strains as well as in natural populations are reported. Finally, the evolutionary history of hAT elements, their domestication and use as transgenic tools are discussed." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'LTR28B'?
[ "SINE", "LINE", "LTR", "DNA" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
LTR28B
LTR
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "Among transposable elements (TEs), the LTR retrotransposons are abundant followed by non-LTR retrotransposons in plant genomes, the lateral being represented by LINEs and SINEs. Computational and molecular approaches were used for the characterization of Brassica LINEs, their diversity and phylogenetic relationships. Four autonomous and four non-autonomous LINE families were identified and characterized from Brassica. Most of the autonomous LINEs displayed two open reading frames, ORF1 and ORF2, where ORF1 is a gag protein domain, while ORF2 encodes endonuclease (EN) and a reverse transcriptase (RT). Three of four families encoded an additional RNase H (RH) domain in pol gene common to 'R' and 'I' type of LINEs. The PCR analyses based on LINEs RT fragments indicate their high diversity and widespread occurrence in tested 40 Brassica cultivars. Database searches revealed the homology in LINE sequences in closely related genera Arabidopsis indicating their origin from common ancestors predating their separation. The alignment of 58 LINEs RT sequences from Brassica, Arabidopsis and other plants depicted 4 conserved domains (domain II-V) showing similarity to previously detected domains. Based on RT alignment of Brassica and 3 known LINEs from monocots, Brassicaceae LINEs clustered in separate clade, further resolving 4 Brassica-Arabidopsis specific families in 2 sub-clades. High similarities were observed in RT sequences in the members of same family, while low homology was detected in members across the families. The investigation led to the characterization of Brassica specific LINE families and their diversity across Brassica species and their cultivars. Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.", "A lineage of CACTA family transposons has been identified in temperate grasses and cereals, and a full-length representative of the subfamily from Lolium perenne has been sequenced. Both the size and internal organization of the L. perenne element are typical of other CACTA family elements but its high copy number and strong conservation are unexpected. Comparison with homologs in other species suggests that this lineage has adopted a distinct and novel evolutionary strategy, which has allowed it to maintain its presence in genomes over long periods of time." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'MER66C' belong to?
[ "TcMar-Tigger", "hAT-Tip100", "L1", "ERV1" ]
ERV1
Subfamily
Family
MER66C
ERV1
[ "A second member of the divergent mori subfamily of mariner transposons, Bmmar6, is described from the silkworm moth Bombyx mori genome. A confident consensus sequence for Bmmar6 was obtained from a single genomic copy, 17 EST sequences, and the direct sequencing of a 'family' sequence from an amplification of all full-length genomic copies. Bmmar6 is most similar to Bmmar1 in the mori subfamily, which now also includes several fly and nematode transposons. These might be viewed as a discrete family of transposons within the IS630-Tc1-mariner superfamily with a distinctive D,D37D catalytic motif, and another small divergent D,D41D clade is recognized as their sister group of transposons.", "We report a new medium reiteration frequency repeat MER53 present in human and mammalian genomes. A 189 bp MER53 consensus sequence has been reconstructed based on the computer analysis of GenBank sequences. TA target site duplication and terminal inverted repeats indicate that the MER53 repeat is a non-autonomous DNA transposon related to the mariner family. Two MER53 repeats were found integrated within different mobile elements. We have found that most of the genes harboring the MER53 repeat are involved in the host defense system. The reasons for this non-random distribution of the repeat are discussed.", "The higher levels of the classification of transposable elements (TEs) from Classes to Superfamilies or Families, is regularly updated, but the lower levels (below the Family) have received little investigation. In particular, this applies to the Families that include a large number of copies. In this article we propose an automatic classification of DNA sequences. This procedure is based on an aggregation process using a pairwise matrix of distances, allowing us to define several groups characterized by a sphere with a central sequence and a radius. This method was tested on the mariner Family, because this is probably one of the most extensively studied Families. Several Subfamilies had already been defined from phylogenetic analyses based on multiple alignments of complete or partial amino-acid sequences of the transposase. The classification obtained here from DNA sequences of 935 items matches the phylogenies of the transposase. The rate of error from a posteriori re-assignment is relatively low." ]
Which subfamily does the class 'LTR' belong to?
[ "MER20", "LTR2C", "HUERS-P3-int", "ERVL47-int" ]
LTR2C
Class
Subfamily
LTR
LTR2C
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are a class of eukaryotic mobile elements characterized by a distinctive sequence similarity-based structure. Hence they are well suited for computational identification. Current software allows for a comprehensive genome-wide de novo detection of such elements. The obvious next step is the classification of newly detected candidates resulting in (super-)families. Such a de novo classification approach based on sequence-based clustering of transposon features has been proposed before, resulting in a preliminary assignment of candidates to families as a basis for subsequent manual refinement. However, such a classification workflow is typically split across a heterogeneous set of glue scripts and generic software (for example, spreadsheets), making it tedious for a human expert to inspect, curate and export the putative families produced by the workflow. We have developed LTRsift, an interactive graphical software tool for semi-automatic postprocessing of de novo predicted LTR retrotransposon annotations. Its user-friendly interface offers customizable filtering and classification functionality, displaying the putative candidate groups, their members and their internal structure in a hierarchical fashion. To ease manual work, it also supports graphical user interface-driven reassignment, splitting and further annotation of candidates. Export of grouped candidate sets in standard formats is possible. In two case studies, we demonstrate how LTRsift can be employed in the context of a genome-wide LTR retrotransposon survey effort. LTRsift is a useful and convenient tool for semi-automated classification of newly detected LTR retrotransposons based on their internal features. Its efficient implementation allows for convenient and seamless filtering and classification in an integrated environment. Developed for life scientists, it is helpful in postprocessing and refining the output of software for predicting LTR retrotransposons up to the stage of preparing full-length reference sequence libraries. The LTRsift software is freely available at http://www.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/LTRsift under an open-source license.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a class of RNA-replicating transposon elements (TEs) that can alter genome structure and function by moving positions, repositioning genes, shifting exons, and causing chromosomal rearrangements. LTR-RTs are widespread in many plant genomes and constitute a significant portion of the genome. Their movement and activity in eukaryotic genomes can provide insight into genome evolution and gene function, especially when LTR-RTs are located near or within genes. Building the redundant and non-redundant LTR-RTs libraries and their annotations for species lacking this resource requires extensive bioinformatics pipelines and expensive computing power to analyze large amounts of genomic data. This increases the need for online services that provide computational resources with minimal overhead and maximum efficiency. Here, we present MegaLTR as a web server and standalone pipeline that detects intact LTR-RTs at the whole-genome level and integrates multiple tools for structure-based, homologybased, and de novo identification, classification, annotation, insertion time determination, and LTR-RT gene chimera analysis. MegaLTR also provides statistical analysis and visualization with multiple tools and can be used to accelerate plant species discovery and assist breeding programs in their efforts to improve genomic resources. We hope that the development of online services such as MegaLTR, which can analyze large amounts of genomic data, will become increasingly important for the automated detection and annotation of LTR-RT elements. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar and El Allali." ]
Which subfamily is in the family 'ERVK'?
[ "MamGypLTR3a", "AluYh7", "HERVK11D-int", "HUERS-P3b-int" ]
HERVK11D-int
Family
Subfamily
ERVK
HERVK11D-int
[ "The human genome harbors numerous distinct families of so-called human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) which are remnants of exogenous retroviruses that entered the germ line millions of years ago. We describe here the hitherto little-characterized betaretrovirus HERV-K(HML-5) family (named HERVK22 in Repbase) in greater detail. Out of 139 proviruses, only a few loci represent full-length proviruses, and many lack gag protease and/or env gene regions. We generated a consensus sequence from multiple alignment of 62 HML-5 loci that displays open reading frames for the four major retroviral proteins. Four HML-5 long terminal repeat (LTR) subfamilies were identified that are associated with monophyletic proviral bodies, implying different evolution of HML-5 LTRs and genes. Sequence analysis indicated that the proviruses formed approximately 55 million years ago. Accordingly, HML-5 proviral sequences were detected in Old World and New World primates but not in prosimians. No recent activity is associated with this HERV family. We also conclude that the HML-5 consensus sequence primer binding site is identical to methionine tRNA. Therefore, the family should be designated HERV-M. Our study provides important insights into the structure and evolution of the oldest betaretrovirus in the primate genome known to date.", "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "A substantial amount of the human genome is composed of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs). Manifold HERV families have been identified, among them several so-called HERV-K(HML) families. Although the HERV-K(HML-2) family has been studied in detail, other HERV-K families are not as well characterized. We describe here the HERV-K HML-3 family in more detail. We estimate that there are about 140 proviral loci or remains of such per haploid genome. Most loci are severely mutated. Proviruses displaying larger deletions in gag and pol are common. A multiple alignment of 73 HERV-K(HML-3) sequences displays several potentially important differences compared with the HERVK9I sequence in Repbase. A consensus sequence with open reading frames for all retroviral genes was generated, for which intact dUTPase motifs and env gene variants with different coding capacities are observed. Phylogenetic analysis shows near-monophyly with distinction of two closely related subgroups. Proviruses formed about 36 million years ago. However, no continuous activity through primate evolution is indicated." ]
Which subfamily does the class 'DNA' belong to?
[ "LTR1A2", "LTR35A", "Zaphod2", "LTR4" ]
Zaphod2
Class
Subfamily
DNA
Zaphod2
[ "The higher levels of the classification of transposable elements (TEs) from Classes to Superfamilies or Families, is regularly updated, but the lower levels (below the Family) have received little investigation. In particular, this applies to the Families that include a large number of copies. In this article we propose an automatic classification of DNA sequences. This procedure is based on an aggregation process using a pairwise matrix of distances, allowing us to define several groups characterized by a sphere with a central sequence and a radius. This method was tested on the mariner Family, because this is probably one of the most extensively studied Families. Several Subfamilies had already been defined from phylogenetic analyses based on multiple alignments of complete or partial amino-acid sequences of the transposase. The classification obtained here from DNA sequences of 935 items matches the phylogenies of the transposase. The rate of error from a posteriori re-assignment is relatively low.", "DNA transposons are ubiquitous components of eukaryotic genomes. Academ superfamily of DNA transposons is one of the least characterized DNA transposon superfamilies in eukaryotes. DNA transposons belonging to the Academ superfamily have been reported from various animals, one red algal species Chondrus crispus, and one fungal species Puccinia graminis. Six Academ families from P. graminis encode a helicase in addition to putative transposase, while some other families encode a single protein which contains a putative transposase and an XPG nuclease. Systematic searches on Repbase and BLAST searches against publicly available genome sequences revealed that several species of fungi and animals contain multiple Academ transposon families encoding a helicase. These AcademH families generate 9 or 10-bp target site duplications (TSDs) while Academ families lacking helicase generate 3 or 4-bp TSDs. Phylogenetic analysis clearly shows two lineages inside of Academ, designated here as AcademH and AcademX for encoding helicase or XPG nuclease, respectively. One sublineage of AcademH in animals encodes plant homeodomain (PHD) finger in its transposase, and its remnants are found in several fish genomes. The AcademH lineage of TEs is widely distributed in animals and fungi, and originated early in the evolution of Academ DNA transposons. This analysis highlights the structural diversity in one less studied superfamily of eukaryotic DNA transposons. © The Author(s) 2020.", "Some mobile genetic elements target the lagging strand template during DNA replication. Bacterial examples are insertion sequences IS608 and ISDra2 (IS200/IS605 family members). They use obligatory single-stranded circular DNA intermediates for excision and insertion and encode a transposase, TnpAIS200, which recognizes subterminal secondary structures at the insertion sequence ends. Similar secondary structures, Repeated Extragenic Palindromes (REP), are present in many bacterial genomes. TnpAIS200-related proteins, TnpAREP, have been identified and could be responsible for REP sequence proliferation. These proteins share a conserved HuH/Tyrosine core domain responsible for catalysis and are involved in processes of ssDNA cleavage and ligation. Our goal is to characterize the diversity of these proteins collectively referred as the TnpAY1 family. A genome-wide analysis of sequences similar to TnpAIS200 and TnpAREP in prokaryotes revealed a large number of family members with a wide taxonomic distribution. These can be arranged into three distinct classes and 12 subclasses based on sequence similarity. One subclass includes sequences similar to TnpAIS200. Proteins from other subclasses are not associated with typical insertion sequence features. These are characterized by specific additional domains possibly involved in protein/DNA or protein/protein interactions. Their genes are found in more than 25% of species analyzed. They exhibit a patchy taxonomic distribution consistent with dissemination by horizontal gene transfers followed by loss. The tnpAREP genes of five subclasses are flanked by typical REP sequences in a REPtron-like arrangement. Four distinct REP types were characterized with a subclass specific distribution. Other subclasses are not associated with REP sequences but have a large conserved domain located in C-terminal end of their sequence. This unexpected diversity suggests that, while most likely involved in processing single-strand DNA, proteins from different subfamilies may play a number of different roles. We established a detailed classification of TnpAY1 proteins, consolidated by the analysis of the conserved core domains and the characterization of additional domains. The data obtained illustrate the unexpected diversity of the TnpAY1 family and provide a strong framework for future evolutionary and functional studies. By their potential function in ssDNA editing, they may confer adaptive responses to host cell physiology and metabolism." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'HERVIP10FH-int'?
[ "LTR", "DNA", "LINE", "SINE" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
HERVIP10FH-int
LTR
[ "Human endogenous retrovirus subfamily H (HERVH) is a class of transposable elements expressed preferentially in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Here, we report that the long terminal repeats of HERVH function as enhancers and that HERVH is a nuclear long noncoding RNA required to maintain hESC identity. Furthermore, HERVH is associated with OCT4, coactivators and Mediator subunits. Together, these results uncover a new role of species-specific transposable elements in hESCs.", "Herves is a functional Class II transposable element in Anopheles gambiae belonging to the hAT superfamily of elements. Class II transposable elements are used as gene vectors in this species and are also being considered as genetic drive agents for spreading desirable genes through natural populations as part of an effort to control malaria transmission. In this study, Herves was investigated in populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s., Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles merus in Mozambique over a period of 2 years. The copy number of Herves within these three species was approximately 5 copies per diploid genome and did not differ among species or between years. Based on the insertion-site occupancy-frequency distribution and existing models of transposable element dynamics, Herves appears to be transpositionally active currently or, at least recently, in all species tested. Ninety-five percent of the individuals within the populations of the three species tested contained intact elements with complete Herves transposase genes and this is consistent with the idea that these elements are currently active.", "Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) represent the inheritance of ancient germ-line cell infections by exogenous retroviruses and the subsequent transmission of the integrated proviruses to the descendants. ERVs have the same internal structure as exogenous retroviruses. While no replication-competent HERVs have been recognized, some retain up to three of four intact ORFs. HERVs have been classified before, with varying scope and depth, notably in the RepBase/RepeatMasker system. However, existing classifications are bewildering. There is a need for a systematic, unifying and simple classification. We strived for a classification which is traceable to previous classifications and which encompasses HERV variation within a limited number of clades. The human genome assembly GRCh 37/hg19 was analyzed with RetroTector, which primarily detects relatively complete Class I and II proviruses. A total of 3173 HERV sequences were identified. The structure of and relations between these proviruses was resolved through a multi-step classification procedure that involved a novel type of similarity image analysis (\"Simage\") which allowed discrimination of heterogeneous (noncanonical) from homogeneous (canonical) HERVs. Of the 3173 HERVs, 1214 were canonical and segregated into 39 canonical clades (groups), belonging to class I (Gamma- and Epsilon-like), II (Beta-like) and III (Spuma-like). The groups were chosen based on (1) sequence (nucleotide and Pol amino acid), similarity, (2) degree of fit to previously published clades, often from RepBase, and (3) taxonomic markers. The groups fell into 11 supergroups. The 1959 noncanonical HERVs contained 31 additional, less well-defined groups. Simage analysis revealed several types of mosaicism, notably recombination and secondary integration. By comparing flanking sequences, LTRs and completeness of gene structure, we deduced that some noncanonical HERVs proliferated after the recombination event. Groups were further divided into envelope subgroups (altogether 94) based on sequence similarity and characteristic \"immunosuppressive domain\" motifs. Intra and inter(super)group, as well as intraclass, recombination involving envelope genes (\"env snatching\") was a common event. LTR divergence indicated that HERV-K(HML2) and HERVFC had the most recent integrations, HERVL and HUERSP3 the oldest. A comprehensive HERV classification and characterization approach was undertaken. It should be applicable for classification of all ERVs. Recombination was common among HERV ancestors." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'MER66C' belong to?
[ "TcMar-Tigger", "ERV1", "DNA", "L1" ]
ERV1
Subfamily
Family
MER66C
ERV1
[ "A second member of the divergent mori subfamily of mariner transposons, Bmmar6, is described from the silkworm moth Bombyx mori genome. A confident consensus sequence for Bmmar6 was obtained from a single genomic copy, 17 EST sequences, and the direct sequencing of a 'family' sequence from an amplification of all full-length genomic copies. Bmmar6 is most similar to Bmmar1 in the mori subfamily, which now also includes several fly and nematode transposons. These might be viewed as a discrete family of transposons within the IS630-Tc1-mariner superfamily with a distinctive D,D37D catalytic motif, and another small divergent D,D41D clade is recognized as their sister group of transposons.", "We report a new medium reiteration frequency repeat MER53 present in human and mammalian genomes. A 189 bp MER53 consensus sequence has been reconstructed based on the computer analysis of GenBank sequences. TA target site duplication and terminal inverted repeats indicate that the MER53 repeat is a non-autonomous DNA transposon related to the mariner family. Two MER53 repeats were found integrated within different mobile elements. We have found that most of the genes harboring the MER53 repeat are involved in the host defense system. The reasons for this non-random distribution of the repeat are discussed.", "The higher levels of the classification of transposable elements (TEs) from Classes to Superfamilies or Families, is regularly updated, but the lower levels (below the Family) have received little investigation. In particular, this applies to the Families that include a large number of copies. In this article we propose an automatic classification of DNA sequences. This procedure is based on an aggregation process using a pairwise matrix of distances, allowing us to define several groups characterized by a sphere with a central sequence and a radius. This method was tested on the mariner Family, because this is probably one of the most extensively studied Families. Several Subfamilies had already been defined from phylogenetic analyses based on multiple alignments of complete or partial amino-acid sequences of the transposase. The classification obtained here from DNA sequences of 935 items matches the phylogenies of the transposase. The rate of error from a posteriori re-assignment is relatively low." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'MLT1K-int'?
[ "DNA", "SINE", "LTR", "LINE" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
MLT1K-int
LTR
[ "Mariner-like elements (MLE) are members from class II of transposable elements also known as DNA transposons. These elements have a wide distribution among different groups of organisms, including insects, which can be explained by horizontal and vertical gene-transfer. MLE families have been described in tephritid flies and other genera. During screening for Wolbachia bacteria in fruit flies of the genus Anastrepha, we discovered two sequences related to mariner-like elements. Based on these sequences, we designed primers that allowed us to isolate and characterize two new mariner-like elements (Anmar1 and Anmar2) in Anastrepha flies. These elements, which belong to the mellifera and rosa subfamilies have a low nucleotide diversity, and are probably inactive and acquired by vertical transfer. This is the first report of mariner-like transposons in flies found in South America.", "Mariner-like elements (MLE) are Class II transposable elements that are very widespread among eukaryotic genomes. One MLE belonging to the mauritiana subfamily, named Botmar1, has been identified in the genome of the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris. gDNA hybridization with the Botmar1 transposase ORF revealed that about 230 elements are present in each haploid genome of B. terrestris that consist entirely of 1.3- and 0.85-kbp elements. The analysis of their sequences revealed that there are two Botmar1 subfamilies of similar ages in the Bombus terrestris genome: one is composed entirely of 1.3-kpb elements, whereas the second comprises both completed and deleted elements. Our previous data indicated that the internally deleted form, which correspond to the 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements occur in other distantly related hymenopteran genomes. Because the presence of similar 1.3- and 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements in some distantly related hymenopteran species cannot be explained by horizontal transfers, the nucleic acid sequence properties of these elements were further investigated. We found that certain structural properties in their nucleic acid sequence might explain the occurrence of 0.85-kbp Botmar1-related elements presenting similarly located internal deletions in hymenopteran genomes.", "Mariner and mariner-like elements (MLEs) have been found in a wide range of organisms including human since its discovery in Drosophila mauritiana. MLEs belong to the mariner/Tc1 superfamily, one of the most diverse and widespread Class II transposable elements. MLEs have a conserved \"D,D(34)D\" motif in their transposases and they transpose by cut-and-paste mechanisms. Their extraordinarily wide host range and horizontal transmission in distantly related species indicate that they do not need additional host-specific factors for transposition. The evidence that MLEs could transform a wide variety of organisms especially the vertebrates supported the host-independent mechanism and suggested the availability as a kind of potential transforming vector." ]
Which class belongs to the subfamily 'PRIMAX-int'?
[ "LTR", "SINE", "DNA", "LINE" ]
LTR
Subfamily
Class
PRIMAX-int
LTR
[ "Platy-1 retroposons are short interspersed elements (SINEs) unique to platyrrhine primates. Discovered in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) genome in 2016, these 100 bp mobile element insertions (MEIs) appeared to be novel drivers of platyrrhine evolution, with over 2200 full-length members across 62 different subfamilies, and strong evidence of ongoing proliferation in C. jacchus. Subsequent characterization of Platy-1 elements in Aotus, Saimiri and Cebus genera, suggested that the widespread mobilization detected in marmoset (family Callithrichidae) was perhaps an anomaly. Two additional Callithrichidae genomes are now available, a scaffold level genome assembly for Saguinus imperator (tamarin; SagImp_v1) and a chromosome-level assembly for Saguinus midas (Midas tamarin; ASM2_v1). Here, we report that each tamarin genome contains over 11,000 full-length Platy-1 insertions, about 1150 are shared by both Saguinus tamarins, 7511 are unique to S. imperator, and another 8187 are unique to S. midas. Roughly 325 are shared among the three callithrichids. We identified six new Platy-1 subfamilies derived from Platy-1-8, with the youngest new subfamily, Platy-1-8c_Saguinus, being the primary source of the Saguinus amplification burst. This constitutes the largest expansion of Platy-1 MEIs reported to date and the most extensive independent SINE amplification between two closely related species.", "Capuchins are platyrrhines (monkeys found in the Americas) within the Cebidae family. For most of their taxonomic history, the two main morphological types of capuchins, gracile (untufted) and robust (tufted), were assigned to a single genus, Cebus. Further, all tufted capuchins were assigned to a single species, Cebus apella, despite broad geographic ranges spanning Central and northern South America. In 2012, tufted capuchins were assigned to their genus, Sapajus, with eight currently recognized species and five Cebus species, although these numbers are still under debate. Alu retrotransposons are a class of mobile element insertion (MEI) widely used to study primate phylogenetics. However, Alu elements have rarely been used to study capuchins. Recent genome-level assemblies for capuchins (Cebus imitator; [Cebus_imitator_1.0] and Sapajus apella [GSC_monkey_1.0]) facilitated large scale ascertainment of young lineage-specific Alu insertions. Reported here are 1607 capuchin specific and 678 Sapajus specific Alu insertions along with candidate oligonucleotides for locus-specific PCR assays for many elements. PCR analyses identified 104 genus level and 51 species level Alu insertion polymorphisms. The Alu datasets reported in this study provide a valuable resource that will assist in the classification of archival samples lacking phenotypic data and for the study of capuchin phylogenetic relationships.", "A homogeneous array of 80 tandem repeats of the Bari1 transposon is located in the pericentromeric h39 region of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we report that the Bari1 cluster is interrupted by an 8556-bp insertion. DNA sequencing and database searches identified this insertion as a previously unannotated retrotransposon that we have named MAX. MAX possesses two ORFs; ORF1 putatively encodes a polyprotein comprising GAG and RT domains, while ORF2 could encode a 288-amino acid protein of unknown function. Alignment with the RT domains of known LTR retrotransposons shows that MAX belongs to the BEL-Pao family, which remarkable for its widespread presence in different taxa, including lower chordates. We have analyzed the distribution of MAX elements within representative species of the Sophophora subgroup and found that they are restricted to the species of the melanogaster complex, where they are heavily represented in the heterochromatin of all autosomes and on the Y chromosome." ]
Which subfamily does the class 'LTR' belong to?
[ "LTR41B", "HERV-Fc1-int", "MER54B", "HERVS71-int" ]
HERVS71-int
Class
Subfamily
LTR
HERVS71-int
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are a class of eukaryotic mobile elements characterized by a distinctive sequence similarity-based structure. Hence they are well suited for computational identification. Current software allows for a comprehensive genome-wide de novo detection of such elements. The obvious next step is the classification of newly detected candidates resulting in (super-)families. Such a de novo classification approach based on sequence-based clustering of transposon features has been proposed before, resulting in a preliminary assignment of candidates to families as a basis for subsequent manual refinement. However, such a classification workflow is typically split across a heterogeneous set of glue scripts and generic software (for example, spreadsheets), making it tedious for a human expert to inspect, curate and export the putative families produced by the workflow. We have developed LTRsift, an interactive graphical software tool for semi-automatic postprocessing of de novo predicted LTR retrotransposon annotations. Its user-friendly interface offers customizable filtering and classification functionality, displaying the putative candidate groups, their members and their internal structure in a hierarchical fashion. To ease manual work, it also supports graphical user interface-driven reassignment, splitting and further annotation of candidates. Export of grouped candidate sets in standard formats is possible. In two case studies, we demonstrate how LTRsift can be employed in the context of a genome-wide LTR retrotransposon survey effort. LTRsift is a useful and convenient tool for semi-automated classification of newly detected LTR retrotransposons based on their internal features. Its efficient implementation allows for convenient and seamless filtering and classification in an integrated environment. Developed for life scientists, it is helpful in postprocessing and refining the output of software for predicting LTR retrotransposons up to the stage of preparing full-length reference sequence libraries. The LTRsift software is freely available at http://www.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/LTRsift under an open-source license.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a class of RNA-replicating transposon elements (TEs) that can alter genome structure and function by moving positions, repositioning genes, shifting exons, and causing chromosomal rearrangements. LTR-RTs are widespread in many plant genomes and constitute a significant portion of the genome. Their movement and activity in eukaryotic genomes can provide insight into genome evolution and gene function, especially when LTR-RTs are located near or within genes. Building the redundant and non-redundant LTR-RTs libraries and their annotations for species lacking this resource requires extensive bioinformatics pipelines and expensive computing power to analyze large amounts of genomic data. This increases the need for online services that provide computational resources with minimal overhead and maximum efficiency. Here, we present MegaLTR as a web server and standalone pipeline that detects intact LTR-RTs at the whole-genome level and integrates multiple tools for structure-based, homologybased, and de novo identification, classification, annotation, insertion time determination, and LTR-RT gene chimera analysis. MegaLTR also provides statistical analysis and visualization with multiple tools and can be used to accelerate plant species discovery and assist breeding programs in their efforts to improve genomic resources. We hope that the development of online services such as MegaLTR, which can analyze large amounts of genomic data, will become increasingly important for the automated detection and annotation of LTR-RT elements. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar and El Allali." ]
Which family does the class 'LTR' belong to?
[ "ERVL", "TcMar-Tigger", "Alu", "ERVK" ]
ERVK
Class
Family
LTR
ERVK
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a class of RNA-replicating transposon elements (TEs) that can alter genome structure and function by moving positions, repositioning genes, shifting exons, and causing chromosomal rearrangements. LTR-RTs are widespread in many plant genomes and constitute a significant portion of the genome. Their movement and activity in eukaryotic genomes can provide insight into genome evolution and gene function, especially when LTR-RTs are located near or within genes. Building the redundant and non-redundant LTR-RTs libraries and their annotations for species lacking this resource requires extensive bioinformatics pipelines and expensive computing power to analyze large amounts of genomic data. This increases the need for online services that provide computational resources with minimal overhead and maximum efficiency. Here, we present MegaLTR as a web server and standalone pipeline that detects intact LTR-RTs at the whole-genome level and integrates multiple tools for structure-based, homologybased, and de novo identification, classification, annotation, insertion time determination, and LTR-RT gene chimera analysis. MegaLTR also provides statistical analysis and visualization with multiple tools and can be used to accelerate plant species discovery and assist breeding programs in their efforts to improve genomic resources. We hope that the development of online services such as MegaLTR, which can analyze large amounts of genomic data, will become increasingly important for the automated detection and annotation of LTR-RT elements. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar and El Allali.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a large group of transposable elements that replicate through an RNA intermediate and alter genome structure. The activities of LTR-RTs in plant genomes provide helpful information about genome evolution and gene function. LTR-RTs near or within genes can directly alter gene function. This work introduces PlantLTRdb, an intact LTR-RT database for 195 plant species. Using homology- and de novo structure-based methods, a total of 150.18 Gbp representing 3,079,469 pseudomolecules/scaffolds were analyzed to identify, characterize, annotate LTR-RTs, estimate insertion ages, detect LTR-RT-gene chimeras, and determine nearby genes. Accordingly, 520,194 intact LTR-RTs were discovered, including 29,462 autonomous and 490,732 nonautonomous LTR-RTs. The autonomous LTR-RTs included 10,286 Gypsy and 19,176 Copia, while the nonautonomous were divided into 224,906 Gypsy, 218,414 Copia, 1,768 BARE-2, 3,147 TR-GAG and 4,2497 unknown. Analysis of the identified LTR-RTs located within genes showed that a total of 36,236 LTR-RTs were LTR-RT-gene chimeras and 11,619 LTR-RTs were within pseudo-genes. In addition, 50,026 genes are within 1 kbp of LTR-RTs, and 250,587 had a distance of 1 to 10 kbp from LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb allows researchers to search, visualize, BLAST and analyze plant LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb can contribute to the understanding of structural variations, genome organization, functional genomics, and the development of LTR-RT target markers for molecular plant breeding. PlantLTRdb is available at https://bioinformatics.um6p.ma/PlantLTRdb. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar, Alsamman and El Allali." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'ERV1'?
[ "LTR", "LINE", "SINE", "DNA" ]
LTR
Family
Class
ERV1
LTR
[ "Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) represent the inheritance of ancient germ-line cell infections by exogenous retroviruses and the subsequent transmission of the integrated proviruses to the descendants. ERVs have the same internal structure as exogenous retroviruses. While no replication-competent HERVs have been recognized, some retain up to three of four intact ORFs. HERVs have been classified before, with varying scope and depth, notably in the RepBase/RepeatMasker system. However, existing classifications are bewildering. There is a need for a systematic, unifying and simple classification. We strived for a classification which is traceable to previous classifications and which encompasses HERV variation within a limited number of clades. The human genome assembly GRCh 37/hg19 was analyzed with RetroTector, which primarily detects relatively complete Class I and II proviruses. A total of 3173 HERV sequences were identified. The structure of and relations between these proviruses was resolved through a multi-step classification procedure that involved a novel type of similarity image analysis (\"Simage\") which allowed discrimination of heterogeneous (noncanonical) from homogeneous (canonical) HERVs. Of the 3173 HERVs, 1214 were canonical and segregated into 39 canonical clades (groups), belonging to class I (Gamma- and Epsilon-like), II (Beta-like) and III (Spuma-like). The groups were chosen based on (1) sequence (nucleotide and Pol amino acid), similarity, (2) degree of fit to previously published clades, often from RepBase, and (3) taxonomic markers. The groups fell into 11 supergroups. The 1959 noncanonical HERVs contained 31 additional, less well-defined groups. Simage analysis revealed several types of mosaicism, notably recombination and secondary integration. By comparing flanking sequences, LTRs and completeness of gene structure, we deduced that some noncanonical HERVs proliferated after the recombination event. Groups were further divided into envelope subgroups (altogether 94) based on sequence similarity and characteristic \"immunosuppressive domain\" motifs. Intra and inter(super)group, as well as intraclass, recombination involving envelope genes (\"env snatching\") was a common event. LTR divergence indicated that HERV-K(HML2) and HERVFC had the most recent integrations, HERVL and HUERSP3 the oldest. A comprehensive HERV classification and characterization approach was undertaken. It should be applicable for classification of all ERVs. Recombination was common among HERV ancestors.", "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "The genomes of many species are crowded with repetitive mobile sequences. In the case of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) there is, for various reasons, considerable confusion regarding names assigned to families/groups of ERVs as well as individual ERV loci. Human ERVs have been studied in greater detail, and naming of HERVs in the scientific literature is somewhat confusing not just to the outsider. Without guidelines, confusion for ERVs in other species will also probably increase if those ERVs are studied in greater detail. Based on previous experience, this review highlights some of the problems when naming and classifying ERVs, and provides some guidance for detecting and characterizing ERV sequences. Because of the close relationship between ERVs and exogenous retroviruses (XRVs) it is reasonable to reconcile their classification with that of XRVs. We here argue that classification should be based on a combination of similarity, structural features, (inferred) function, and previous nomenclature. Because the RepBase system is widely employed in genome annotation, RepBase designations should be considered in further taxonomic efforts. To lay a foundation for a phylogenetically based taxonomy, further analyses of ERVs in many hosts are needed. A dedicated, permanent, international consortium would best be suited to integrate and communicate our current and future knowledge on repetitive, mobile elements in general to the scientific community." ]
Which family does the class 'LTR' belong to?
[ "hAT-Charlie", "L1", "TcMar-Tigger", "ERVL" ]
ERVL
Class
Family
LTR
ERVL
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a class of RNA-replicating transposon elements (TEs) that can alter genome structure and function by moving positions, repositioning genes, shifting exons, and causing chromosomal rearrangements. LTR-RTs are widespread in many plant genomes and constitute a significant portion of the genome. Their movement and activity in eukaryotic genomes can provide insight into genome evolution and gene function, especially when LTR-RTs are located near or within genes. Building the redundant and non-redundant LTR-RTs libraries and their annotations for species lacking this resource requires extensive bioinformatics pipelines and expensive computing power to analyze large amounts of genomic data. This increases the need for online services that provide computational resources with minimal overhead and maximum efficiency. Here, we present MegaLTR as a web server and standalone pipeline that detects intact LTR-RTs at the whole-genome level and integrates multiple tools for structure-based, homologybased, and de novo identification, classification, annotation, insertion time determination, and LTR-RT gene chimera analysis. MegaLTR also provides statistical analysis and visualization with multiple tools and can be used to accelerate plant species discovery and assist breeding programs in their efforts to improve genomic resources. We hope that the development of online services such as MegaLTR, which can analyze large amounts of genomic data, will become increasingly important for the automated detection and annotation of LTR-RT elements. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar and El Allali.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a large group of transposable elements that replicate through an RNA intermediate and alter genome structure. The activities of LTR-RTs in plant genomes provide helpful information about genome evolution and gene function. LTR-RTs near or within genes can directly alter gene function. This work introduces PlantLTRdb, an intact LTR-RT database for 195 plant species. Using homology- and de novo structure-based methods, a total of 150.18 Gbp representing 3,079,469 pseudomolecules/scaffolds were analyzed to identify, characterize, annotate LTR-RTs, estimate insertion ages, detect LTR-RT-gene chimeras, and determine nearby genes. Accordingly, 520,194 intact LTR-RTs were discovered, including 29,462 autonomous and 490,732 nonautonomous LTR-RTs. The autonomous LTR-RTs included 10,286 Gypsy and 19,176 Copia, while the nonautonomous were divided into 224,906 Gypsy, 218,414 Copia, 1,768 BARE-2, 3,147 TR-GAG and 4,2497 unknown. Analysis of the identified LTR-RTs located within genes showed that a total of 36,236 LTR-RTs were LTR-RT-gene chimeras and 11,619 LTR-RTs were within pseudo-genes. In addition, 50,026 genes are within 1 kbp of LTR-RTs, and 250,587 had a distance of 1 to 10 kbp from LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb allows researchers to search, visualize, BLAST and analyze plant LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb can contribute to the understanding of structural variations, genome organization, functional genomics, and the development of LTR-RT target markers for molecular plant breeding. PlantLTRdb is available at https://bioinformatics.um6p.ma/PlantLTRdb. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar, Alsamman and El Allali." ]
Which family does the class 'LTR' belong to?
[ "L1", "Alu", "DNA", "ERVL" ]
ERVL
Class
Family
LTR
ERVL
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a class of RNA-replicating transposon elements (TEs) that can alter genome structure and function by moving positions, repositioning genes, shifting exons, and causing chromosomal rearrangements. LTR-RTs are widespread in many plant genomes and constitute a significant portion of the genome. Their movement and activity in eukaryotic genomes can provide insight into genome evolution and gene function, especially when LTR-RTs are located near or within genes. Building the redundant and non-redundant LTR-RTs libraries and their annotations for species lacking this resource requires extensive bioinformatics pipelines and expensive computing power to analyze large amounts of genomic data. This increases the need for online services that provide computational resources with minimal overhead and maximum efficiency. Here, we present MegaLTR as a web server and standalone pipeline that detects intact LTR-RTs at the whole-genome level and integrates multiple tools for structure-based, homologybased, and de novo identification, classification, annotation, insertion time determination, and LTR-RT gene chimera analysis. MegaLTR also provides statistical analysis and visualization with multiple tools and can be used to accelerate plant species discovery and assist breeding programs in their efforts to improve genomic resources. We hope that the development of online services such as MegaLTR, which can analyze large amounts of genomic data, will become increasingly important for the automated detection and annotation of LTR-RT elements. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar and El Allali.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a large group of transposable elements that replicate through an RNA intermediate and alter genome structure. The activities of LTR-RTs in plant genomes provide helpful information about genome evolution and gene function. LTR-RTs near or within genes can directly alter gene function. This work introduces PlantLTRdb, an intact LTR-RT database for 195 plant species. Using homology- and de novo structure-based methods, a total of 150.18 Gbp representing 3,079,469 pseudomolecules/scaffolds were analyzed to identify, characterize, annotate LTR-RTs, estimate insertion ages, detect LTR-RT-gene chimeras, and determine nearby genes. Accordingly, 520,194 intact LTR-RTs were discovered, including 29,462 autonomous and 490,732 nonautonomous LTR-RTs. The autonomous LTR-RTs included 10,286 Gypsy and 19,176 Copia, while the nonautonomous were divided into 224,906 Gypsy, 218,414 Copia, 1,768 BARE-2, 3,147 TR-GAG and 4,2497 unknown. Analysis of the identified LTR-RTs located within genes showed that a total of 36,236 LTR-RTs were LTR-RT-gene chimeras and 11,619 LTR-RTs were within pseudo-genes. In addition, 50,026 genes are within 1 kbp of LTR-RTs, and 250,587 had a distance of 1 to 10 kbp from LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb allows researchers to search, visualize, BLAST and analyze plant LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb can contribute to the understanding of structural variations, genome organization, functional genomics, and the development of LTR-RT target markers for molecular plant breeding. PlantLTRdb is available at https://bioinformatics.um6p.ma/PlantLTRdb. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar, Alsamman and El Allali." ]
Which subfamily does the class 'DNA' belong to?
[ "HERV-Fc1-int", "LTR41B", "Tigger16a", "LTR1B1" ]
Tigger16a
Class
Subfamily
DNA
Tigger16a
[ "The higher levels of the classification of transposable elements (TEs) from Classes to Superfamilies or Families, is regularly updated, but the lower levels (below the Family) have received little investigation. In particular, this applies to the Families that include a large number of copies. In this article we propose an automatic classification of DNA sequences. This procedure is based on an aggregation process using a pairwise matrix of distances, allowing us to define several groups characterized by a sphere with a central sequence and a radius. This method was tested on the mariner Family, because this is probably one of the most extensively studied Families. Several Subfamilies had already been defined from phylogenetic analyses based on multiple alignments of complete or partial amino-acid sequences of the transposase. The classification obtained here from DNA sequences of 935 items matches the phylogenies of the transposase. The rate of error from a posteriori re-assignment is relatively low.", "DNA transposons are ubiquitous components of eukaryotic genomes. Academ superfamily of DNA transposons is one of the least characterized DNA transposon superfamilies in eukaryotes. DNA transposons belonging to the Academ superfamily have been reported from various animals, one red algal species Chondrus crispus, and one fungal species Puccinia graminis. Six Academ families from P. graminis encode a helicase in addition to putative transposase, while some other families encode a single protein which contains a putative transposase and an XPG nuclease. Systematic searches on Repbase and BLAST searches against publicly available genome sequences revealed that several species of fungi and animals contain multiple Academ transposon families encoding a helicase. These AcademH families generate 9 or 10-bp target site duplications (TSDs) while Academ families lacking helicase generate 3 or 4-bp TSDs. Phylogenetic analysis clearly shows two lineages inside of Academ, designated here as AcademH and AcademX for encoding helicase or XPG nuclease, respectively. One sublineage of AcademH in animals encodes plant homeodomain (PHD) finger in its transposase, and its remnants are found in several fish genomes. The AcademH lineage of TEs is widely distributed in animals and fungi, and originated early in the evolution of Academ DNA transposons. This analysis highlights the structural diversity in one less studied superfamily of eukaryotic DNA transposons. © The Author(s) 2020.", "Some mobile genetic elements target the lagging strand template during DNA replication. Bacterial examples are insertion sequences IS608 and ISDra2 (IS200/IS605 family members). They use obligatory single-stranded circular DNA intermediates for excision and insertion and encode a transposase, TnpAIS200, which recognizes subterminal secondary structures at the insertion sequence ends. Similar secondary structures, Repeated Extragenic Palindromes (REP), are present in many bacterial genomes. TnpAIS200-related proteins, TnpAREP, have been identified and could be responsible for REP sequence proliferation. These proteins share a conserved HuH/Tyrosine core domain responsible for catalysis and are involved in processes of ssDNA cleavage and ligation. Our goal is to characterize the diversity of these proteins collectively referred as the TnpAY1 family. A genome-wide analysis of sequences similar to TnpAIS200 and TnpAREP in prokaryotes revealed a large number of family members with a wide taxonomic distribution. These can be arranged into three distinct classes and 12 subclasses based on sequence similarity. One subclass includes sequences similar to TnpAIS200. Proteins from other subclasses are not associated with typical insertion sequence features. These are characterized by specific additional domains possibly involved in protein/DNA or protein/protein interactions. Their genes are found in more than 25% of species analyzed. They exhibit a patchy taxonomic distribution consistent with dissemination by horizontal gene transfers followed by loss. The tnpAREP genes of five subclasses are flanked by typical REP sequences in a REPtron-like arrangement. Four distinct REP types were characterized with a subclass specific distribution. Other subclasses are not associated with REP sequences but have a large conserved domain located in C-terminal end of their sequence. This unexpected diversity suggests that, while most likely involved in processing single-strand DNA, proteins from different subfamilies may play a number of different roles. We established a detailed classification of TnpAY1 proteins, consolidated by the analysis of the conserved core domains and the characterization of additional domains. The data obtained illustrate the unexpected diversity of the TnpAY1 family and provide a strong framework for future evolutionary and functional studies. By their potential function in ssDNA editing, they may confer adaptive responses to host cell physiology and metabolism." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'hAT-Tip100'?
[ "SINE", "LINE", "DNA", "LTR" ]
DNA
Family
Class
hAT-Tip100
DNA
[ "Tip100 is an Ac-like transposable element that belongs to the hAT superfamily. First discovered in Ipomoea purpurea (common morning glory), it was classified as an autonomous element capable of movement within the genome. As Tip100 data were already available in databases, the sequences of related elements in ten additional species of Ipomoea and five commercial varieties were isolated and analyzed. Evolutionary analysis based on sequence diversity in nuclear ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS), was also applied to compare the evolution of these elements with that of Tip100 in the Ipomoea genus. Tip100 sequences were found in I. purpurea, I. nil, I. indica and I. alba, all of which showed high levels of similarity. The results of phylogenetic analysis of transposon sequences were congruent with the phylogenetic topology obtained for ITS sequences, thereby demonstrating that Tip100 is restricted to a particular group of species within Ipomoea. We hypothesize that Tip100 was probably acquired from a common ancestor and has been transmitted vertically within this genus.", "The hAT family is a group of transposable elements of the terminal inverted repeat class, which includes Ac of maize, hobo of Drosophila and Tam3 of Antirrhinum (snapdragon). All the members of this family so far examined are known to comprise complete and defective copies, with a good correspondence to autonomous and non-autonomous elements, respectively. Internal deletion is the most common cause of defective copies. Tol2, a transposable element of the medaka fish Oryzias latipes, is a member of the hAT family. We examined, mainly by the genomic Southern blot analysis, variation in the structure of copies of this element, and revealed that there are few or no internally deleted copies. This situation is unusual in a member of the hAT family. Possible causes of this anomaly are discussed.", "The hAT transposons, very abundant in all kingdoms, have a common evolutionary origin probably predating the plant-fungi-animal divergence. In this paper we present their general characteristics. Members of this superfamily belong to Class II transposable elements. hAT elements share transposase, short terminal inverted repeats and eight base-pairs duplication of genomic target. We focus on hAT elements in Drosophila, especially hobo. Its distribution, dynamics and impact on genome restructuring in laboratory strains as well as in natural populations are reported. Finally, the evolutionary history of hAT elements, their domestication and use as transgenic tools are discussed." ]
Which family does the class 'DNA' belong to?
[ "hAT-Charlie", "L1", "TcMar-Tigger", "DNA" ]
hAT-Charlie
Class
Family
DNA
hAT-Charlie
[ "The higher levels of the classification of transposable elements (TEs) from Classes to Superfamilies or Families, is regularly updated, but the lower levels (below the Family) have received little investigation. In particular, this applies to the Families that include a large number of copies. In this article we propose an automatic classification of DNA sequences. This procedure is based on an aggregation process using a pairwise matrix of distances, allowing us to define several groups characterized by a sphere with a central sequence and a radius. This method was tested on the mariner Family, because this is probably one of the most extensively studied Families. Several Subfamilies had already been defined from phylogenetic analyses based on multiple alignments of complete or partial amino-acid sequences of the transposase. The classification obtained here from DNA sequences of 935 items matches the phylogenies of the transposase. The rate of error from a posteriori re-assignment is relatively low.", "The L family (long interspersed repeated DNA) of mobile genetic elements is a persistent feature of the mammalian genome. In rats, this family contains approximately equal to 40,000 members and accounts for approximately equal to 10% of the haploid genome. We demonstrate here that the guanine-rich homopurine stretches located at the right end of L-DNA induce oligonucleotide uptake by contiguous duplex DNA. The uptake is dependent on negative supercoiling and the length of the homopurine stretch and occurs even when the L-DNA homopurine stretches are introduced into a different DNA environment. The bound oligomer primes DNA synthesis when DNA polymerase and deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates are added, resulting in a faithful copy of the template to which the oligonucleotide had bound. The implications of this property of the L-DNA guanine-rich homopurine stretches in the amplification, recombination, and dispersal of L elements is discussed.", "DNA transposons are ubiquitous components of eukaryotic genomes. Academ superfamily of DNA transposons is one of the least characterized DNA transposon superfamilies in eukaryotes. DNA transposons belonging to the Academ superfamily have been reported from various animals, one red algal species Chondrus crispus, and one fungal species Puccinia graminis. Six Academ families from P. graminis encode a helicase in addition to putative transposase, while some other families encode a single protein which contains a putative transposase and an XPG nuclease. Systematic searches on Repbase and BLAST searches against publicly available genome sequences revealed that several species of fungi and animals contain multiple Academ transposon families encoding a helicase. These AcademH families generate 9 or 10-bp target site duplications (TSDs) while Academ families lacking helicase generate 3 or 4-bp TSDs. Phylogenetic analysis clearly shows two lineages inside of Academ, designated here as AcademH and AcademX for encoding helicase or XPG nuclease, respectively. One sublineage of AcademH in animals encodes plant homeodomain (PHD) finger in its transposase, and its remnants are found in several fish genomes. The AcademH lineage of TEs is widely distributed in animals and fungi, and originated early in the evolution of Academ DNA transposons. This analysis highlights the structural diversity in one less studied superfamily of eukaryotic DNA transposons. © The Author(s) 2020." ]
Which class belongs to the family 'ERV1'?
[ "LTR", "DNA", "LINE", "SINE" ]
LTR
Family
Class
ERV1
LTR
[ "Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) represent the inheritance of ancient germ-line cell infections by exogenous retroviruses and the subsequent transmission of the integrated proviruses to the descendants. ERVs have the same internal structure as exogenous retroviruses. While no replication-competent HERVs have been recognized, some retain up to three of four intact ORFs. HERVs have been classified before, with varying scope and depth, notably in the RepBase/RepeatMasker system. However, existing classifications are bewildering. There is a need for a systematic, unifying and simple classification. We strived for a classification which is traceable to previous classifications and which encompasses HERV variation within a limited number of clades. The human genome assembly GRCh 37/hg19 was analyzed with RetroTector, which primarily detects relatively complete Class I and II proviruses. A total of 3173 HERV sequences were identified. The structure of and relations between these proviruses was resolved through a multi-step classification procedure that involved a novel type of similarity image analysis (\"Simage\") which allowed discrimination of heterogeneous (noncanonical) from homogeneous (canonical) HERVs. Of the 3173 HERVs, 1214 were canonical and segregated into 39 canonical clades (groups), belonging to class I (Gamma- and Epsilon-like), II (Beta-like) and III (Spuma-like). The groups were chosen based on (1) sequence (nucleotide and Pol amino acid), similarity, (2) degree of fit to previously published clades, often from RepBase, and (3) taxonomic markers. The groups fell into 11 supergroups. The 1959 noncanonical HERVs contained 31 additional, less well-defined groups. Simage analysis revealed several types of mosaicism, notably recombination and secondary integration. By comparing flanking sequences, LTRs and completeness of gene structure, we deduced that some noncanonical HERVs proliferated after the recombination event. Groups were further divided into envelope subgroups (altogether 94) based on sequence similarity and characteristic \"immunosuppressive domain\" motifs. Intra and inter(super)group, as well as intraclass, recombination involving envelope genes (\"env snatching\") was a common event. LTR divergence indicated that HERV-K(HML2) and HERVFC had the most recent integrations, HERVL and HUERSP3 the oldest. A comprehensive HERV classification and characterization approach was undertaken. It should be applicable for classification of all ERVs. Recombination was common among HERV ancestors.", "Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which blur the boundary between virus and transposable element, are genetic material derived from retroviruses and have important implications for evolution. This study examines the diversity and evolution of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) of the HERVL family, which has long terminal repeats (LTRs) named MLT2. By probability-based sequence comparison, we uncover systematic annotation errors that conceal the true complexity and diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome. Our analysis identifies new subfamilies within the MLT2 group, proposes a refined classification scheme, and constructs new consensus sequences. We present an evolutionary analysis including phylogenetic trees that elucidate the relationships between these subfamilies and their contributions to human evolution. The results underscore the significance of accurate TE annotation in understanding genome evolution, highlighting the potential for misclassified TEs to impact interpretations of genomic studies. Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.", "The genomes of many species are crowded with repetitive mobile sequences. In the case of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) there is, for various reasons, considerable confusion regarding names assigned to families/groups of ERVs as well as individual ERV loci. Human ERVs have been studied in greater detail, and naming of HERVs in the scientific literature is somewhat confusing not just to the outsider. Without guidelines, confusion for ERVs in other species will also probably increase if those ERVs are studied in greater detail. Based on previous experience, this review highlights some of the problems when naming and classifying ERVs, and provides some guidance for detecting and characterizing ERV sequences. Because of the close relationship between ERVs and exogenous retroviruses (XRVs) it is reasonable to reconcile their classification with that of XRVs. We here argue that classification should be based on a combination of similarity, structural features, (inferred) function, and previous nomenclature. Because the RepBase system is widely employed in genome annotation, RepBase designations should be considered in further taxonomic efforts. To lay a foundation for a phylogenetically based taxonomy, further analyses of ERVs in many hosts are needed. A dedicated, permanent, international consortium would best be suited to integrate and communicate our current and future knowledge on repetitive, mobile elements in general to the scientific community." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'LTR75B' belong to?
[ "hAT-Tip100", "Alu", "ERVL", "Gypsy" ]
ERVL
Subfamily
Family
LTR75B
ERVL
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "Long terminal retrotransposons are major components of eukaryotic transposable elements. We have surveyed the long terminal repeats (LTR) retrotransposons of domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori) by mining the data produced by Bombyx mori Genome Sequencing Project. At least 29 separate families of LTR retrotransposons are identified in this survey, comprising of 11.8% of the complete sequence. Families of domesticated silkworm LTR retrotransposons can be mainly classified into three groups: gypsy-like, copia-like, Pao-Bel. Fourteen families identified consist of gypsy-like elements, four families consist of copia-like elements and seven families consist of Pao-Bel elements. In addition to the three groups of LTR retrotransposons, two families of unusual non-coding elements are identified in the genome of this species. Further phylogenetic analysis of RT domain indicates that the elements of B.mori show high diversity and can form different clades in each group. An analysis of sequence variation from different families reveals distinct patterns of variation for the elements belonging to three groups. The analysis of the domesticated silkworm LTR retrotransposons should assist in our understanding of the roles of retroelement in lepidopteron insect genome evolution.", "Although the ERVL-mammalian-apparent LTR retrotransposons (MaLRs) are the fourth largest family of transposable elements in the human genome, their evolutionary history and relationship have not been thoroughly studied. In this study, through RepeatMasker annotations of some representative species and construction of phylogenetic tree by sequence similarity, all primate-specific MaLR members are found to descend from MLT1A1 retrotransposon. Comparative genomic analysis, transposition-in-transposition inference, and sequence feature comparisons consistently show that each MaLR member evolved from its predecessor successively and had a limited activity period during primate evolution. Accordingly, a novel MaLR member was discovered as successor of MSTB1 in Tarsiiformes. At last, the identification of candidate precursor and intermediate THE1A elements provides further evidence for the previously proposed arms race model between ZNF430/ZNF100 and THE1B/THE1A. Taken together, this study sheds light on the evolutionary history of MaLRs and can serve as a foundation for future research on their interactions with zinc finger genes, gene regulation, and human health implications. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press." ]
Which family does the class 'LINE' belong to?
[ "Gypsy", "ERVL-MaLR", "L1", "ERVK" ]
L1
Class
Family
LINE
L1
[ "LINEs are transposable elements found in various eukaryotes such as plants, protists, insects, and mammals. Their transposition is usually difficult to study, particularly in humans, where some diseases have been shown to result from LINE insertion mutations. This is due to the fact that most copies of any particular family of elements are defective and that their transposition frequency is low. By contrast, the I factor of Drosophila melanogaster transposes at high frequency during I-R hybrid dysgenesis and is a good model for studying the LINE element superfamily. LINEs encode putative polypeptides showing similarities with viral reverse transcriptases but, unlike viral retrotransposons, they do not have terminal repeats and their ability to transpose by reverse transcription has previously only been inferred from structural analysis. Here we present direct evidence for LINE retrotransposition. Transposition of an I factor marked by an intron resulted in accurate removal of the intron.", "LINE-1 (L1) is a mammalian family of highly repeated DNA sequences that are members of a class of transposable elements whose movement involves an RNA intermediate. Both structural and evolutionary data indicate that the L1 family consists of a small number of active transposable elements interspersed with a large number of L1 pseudogenes. In the mouse, the longest, characterized L1 sequences span about 7000 base-pairs and contain two long open reading frames. Two subfamilies of mouse L1 elements, A and F, have been defined on the basis of the type of putative transcriptional regulatory sequence found at the 5' end. In order to identify a transcribed subset of L1 elements in mouse F9 teratocarcinoma cells, we have examined the strand-specificity of L1 transcription by Northern analysis and compared the open reading frame-1 sequences of ten A-type cDNAs with fifteen genomic A-type L1 elements. Transcripts containing A-type sequence are far more abundant than those containing F-type sequence. Although the majority of L1 RNA in F9 cells appears to be transcribed non-specifically from both strands, our results provide evidence for a subpopulation of variable length, strand-specific transcripts arising from A-type transcriptional regulatory sequences. F9 cell cDNA sequences, which share greater than 99.5% sequence identity with one another, represent a homogeneous subset of the genomic L1 population. Examination of genomic mouse L1 sequences reveals three types of length polymorphism in a defined segment of the first open reading frame. Phylogenetic analysis shows a correlation between the type of length polymorphism in the first open reading frame and the relative age of an individual A-type genomic L1 element. Comparison of the cDNA and genomic sequences indicates that the youngest subgroup of A-type L1 elements is preferentially transcribed in F9 cells. This subgroup may be currently dominating the L1 dispersal process in mice.", "Among transposable elements (TEs), the LTR retrotransposons are abundant followed by non-LTR retrotransposons in plant genomes, the lateral being represented by LINEs and SINEs. Computational and molecular approaches were used for the characterization of Brassica LINEs, their diversity and phylogenetic relationships. Four autonomous and four non-autonomous LINE families were identified and characterized from Brassica. Most of the autonomous LINEs displayed two open reading frames, ORF1 and ORF2, where ORF1 is a gag protein domain, while ORF2 encodes endonuclease (EN) and a reverse transcriptase (RT). Three of four families encoded an additional RNase H (RH) domain in pol gene common to 'R' and 'I' type of LINEs. The PCR analyses based on LINEs RT fragments indicate their high diversity and widespread occurrence in tested 40 Brassica cultivars. Database searches revealed the homology in LINE sequences in closely related genera Arabidopsis indicating their origin from common ancestors predating their separation. The alignment of 58 LINEs RT sequences from Brassica, Arabidopsis and other plants depicted 4 conserved domains (domain II-V) showing similarity to previously detected domains. Based on RT alignment of Brassica and 3 known LINEs from monocots, Brassicaceae LINEs clustered in separate clade, further resolving 4 Brassica-Arabidopsis specific families in 2 sub-clades. High similarities were observed in RT sequences in the members of same family, while low homology was detected in members across the families. The investigation led to the characterization of Brassica specific LINE families and their diversity across Brassica species and their cultivars. Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved." ]
Which family does the subfamily 'LTR22A' belong to?
[ "ERVK", "TcMar-Tigger", "DNA", "hAT-Charlie" ]
ERVK
Subfamily
Family
LTR22A
ERVK
[ "Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are transposable elements flanked by 5'/3' LTRs. They have a structure similar to endogenous retroviruses, but they lack the envelope (env) gene making them non-infectious. Long terminal repeats are motif-rich sequences and can act as bidirectional promoters or enhancers to regulate or inactivate genes by insertion. In this study, we identified a new chimeric LTR subfamily, LTR2i_SS, in the pig genome. This chimeric LTR family appears to be the ancestral form of the previously described LTR2_SS family. LTR2_SS appears to have deleted ~300 bp of un-annotated, ancestral sequence from LTR2i_SS. We identified no functional provirus sequences for either of these LTR types. LTR2i_SS sequences have been exapted into the untranslated regions of two protein-coding gene mRNAs. Both of these genes lie within previously mapped pig quantitative trait loci. © 2014 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.", "LTR-retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) are a large group of transposable elements that replicate through an RNA intermediate and alter genome structure. The activities of LTR-RTs in plant genomes provide helpful information about genome evolution and gene function. LTR-RTs near or within genes can directly alter gene function. This work introduces PlantLTRdb, an intact LTR-RT database for 195 plant species. Using homology- and de novo structure-based methods, a total of 150.18 Gbp representing 3,079,469 pseudomolecules/scaffolds were analyzed to identify, characterize, annotate LTR-RTs, estimate insertion ages, detect LTR-RT-gene chimeras, and determine nearby genes. Accordingly, 520,194 intact LTR-RTs were discovered, including 29,462 autonomous and 490,732 nonautonomous LTR-RTs. The autonomous LTR-RTs included 10,286 Gypsy and 19,176 Copia, while the nonautonomous were divided into 224,906 Gypsy, 218,414 Copia, 1,768 BARE-2, 3,147 TR-GAG and 4,2497 unknown. Analysis of the identified LTR-RTs located within genes showed that a total of 36,236 LTR-RTs were LTR-RT-gene chimeras and 11,619 LTR-RTs were within pseudo-genes. In addition, 50,026 genes are within 1 kbp of LTR-RTs, and 250,587 had a distance of 1 to 10 kbp from LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb allows researchers to search, visualize, BLAST and analyze plant LTR-RTs. PlantLTRdb can contribute to the understanding of structural variations, genome organization, functional genomics, and the development of LTR-RT target markers for molecular plant breeding. PlantLTRdb is available at https://bioinformatics.um6p.ma/PlantLTRdb. Copyright © 2023 Mokhtar, Alsamman and El Allali.", "Over a hundred families of non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons (non-LTRs) were found in the newly released Anopheles gambiae genome assembly during a reiterative and comprehensive search using the conserved reverse transcriptase (RT) domains of known non-LTRs as the starting queries. These families, which are defined by at least 20% amino acid sequence divergence in their RT domains, range from a few to approximately 2,000 copies and occupy at least 3% of the genome. In addition to having an unprecedented number of diverse families, A. gambiae non-LTRs represent 8 of the 15 previously defined clades plus two novel clades, Loner and Outcast, more than what has been reported for any genome. Five families were found belonging to the L1 clade, which had no invertebrate representatives to date. One unique family named Sponge contains only a complete open reading frame (ORF) for the Gag-like protein and appears to have been mobilized by a family of the CR1 clade. Although most families appear to be inactive as expected, all clades except R4 have families with characteristics suggesting recent activity. At least 21 families have multiple full-length copies with over 99% nucleotide identity and some or all of the following characteristics: target site duplications (TSDs), intact ORFs, and corresponding expressed sequence tags (ESTs). The incredible diversity and the maintenance of multiple recently active lineages within different clades indicate a complex evolutionary scenario. A. gambiae non-LTRs have the potential to be developed as tools for population genetic studies and genetic manipulations of this primary vector of the devastating disease malaria. The semi-automated reiterative search approach described here may be used with any genome assembly to systematically survey and characterize non-LTRs as well as other transposable elements that encode a conserved protein." ]
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
106