diff --git a/globus_sdk/auth/token_response.py b/globus_sdk/auth/token_response.py
index 8b50dba3..65c8688e 100644
--- a/globus_sdk/auth/token_response.py
+++ b/globus_sdk/auth/token_response.py
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ import logging
 import json
 import requests
 import time
+import six
 
 import jwt
 
@@ -24,10 +25,71 @@ def _convert_token_info_dict(source_dict):
         'access_token': source_dict['access_token'],
         'refresh_token': source_dict.get('refresh_token'),
         'token_type': source_dict.get('token_type'),
-        'expires_at_seconds': int(time.time() + expires_in)
+        'expires_at_seconds': int(time.time() + expires_in),
+        'resource_server': source_dict['resource_server']
     }
 
 
+class _ByScopesGetter(object):
+    """
+    A fancy dict-like object for looking up token data by scope name.
+    Allows usage like
+
+    >>> tokens = OAuthTokenResponse(...)
+    >>> tok = tokens.by_scopes['openid profile']['access_token']
+    """
+    def __init__(self, scope_map):
+        self.scope_map = scope_map
+
+    def __str__(self):
+        return json.dumps(self.scope_map)
+
+    def __iter__(self):
+        """iteration gets you every individual scope"""
+        return iter(self.scope_map.keys())
+
+    def __getitem__(self, scopename):
+        if not isinstance(scopename, six.string_types):
+            raise KeyError('by_scopes cannot contain non-string value "{}"'
+                           .format(scopename))
+
+        # split on spaces
+        scopes = scopename.split()
+        # collect every matching token in a set to dedup
+        # but collect actual results (dicts) in a list
+        rs_names = set()
+        toks = []
+        for scope in scopes:
+            try:
+                rs_names.add(self.scope_map[scope]['resource_server'])
+                toks.append(self.scope_map[scope])
+            except KeyError:
+                raise KeyError(('Scope specifier "{}" contains scope "{}" '
+                                "which was not found"
+                                ).format(scopename, scope))
+        # if there isn't exactly 1 token, it's an error
+        if len(rs_names) != 1:
+            raise KeyError(
+                'Scope specifier "{}" did not match exactly one token!'
+                .format(scopename))
+        # pop the only element in the set
+        return toks.pop()
+
+    def __contains__(self, item):
+        """
+        contains is driven by checking against getitem
+        that way, the definitions are always "in sync" if we update them in
+        the future
+        """
+        try:
+            self.__getitem__(item)
+            return True
+        except KeyError:
+            pass
+
+        return False
+
+
 class OAuthTokenResponse(GlobusHTTPResponse):
     """
     Class for responses from the OAuth2 code for tokens exchange used in
@@ -36,11 +98,20 @@ class OAuthTokenResponse(GlobusHTTPResponse):
     def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
         GlobusHTTPResponse.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
         self._init_rs_dict()
+        self._init_scopes_getter()
+
+    def _init_scopes_getter(self):
+        scope_map = {}
+        for rs, tok_data in self._by_resource_server.items():
+            for s in tok_data["scope"].split():
+                scope_map[s] = tok_data
+        self._by_scopes = _ByScopesGetter(scope_map)
 
     def _init_rs_dict(self):
         # call the helper at the top level
         self._by_resource_server = {
-            self['resource_server']: _convert_token_info_dict(self)}
+            self['resource_server']: _convert_token_info_dict(self)
+        }
         # call the helper on everything in 'other_tokens'
         self._by_resource_server.update(dict(
             (unprocessed_item['resource_server'],
@@ -59,6 +130,29 @@ class OAuthTokenResponse(GlobusHTTPResponse):
         """
         return self._by_resource_server
 
+    @property
+    def by_scopes(self):
+        """
+        Representation of the token response in a dict-like object indexed by
+        scope name (or even space delimited scope names, so long as they match
+        the same token).
+
+        If you request scopes `scope1 scope2 scope3`, where `scope1` and
+        `scope2` are for the same service (and therefore map to the same
+        token), but `scope3` is for a different service, the following forms of
+        access are valid:
+
+        >>> tokens = ...
+        >>> # single scope
+        >>> token_data = tokens.by_scopes['scope1']
+        >>> token_data = tokens.by_scopes['scope2']
+        >>> token_data = tokens.by_scopes['scope3']
+        >>> # matching scopes
+        >>> token_data = tokens.by_scopes['scope1 scope2']
+        >>> token_data = tokens.by_scopes['scope2 scope1']
+        """
+        return self._by_scopes
+
     def decode_id_token(self, auth_client=None):
         """
         A parsed ID Token (OIDC) as a dict.

diff --git a/tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py b/tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py
index e9d0e9e6..fd9f993a 100644
--- a/tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py
+++ b/tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ class OAuthTokenResponseTests(CapturedIOTestCase):
             "id_token": "invalid_id_token",
             "access_token": SDKTESTER1A_ID_ACCESS_TOKEN}
         self.other_token2 = {  # valid id_token with invalid access_token
-            "resource_server": "server3", "expires_in": 30, "scope": "scope3",
+            "resource_server": "server3", "expires_in": 30,
+            "scope": "scope3 scope4",
             "refresh_token": "RT3", "other_tokens": [], "token_type": "3",
             "id_token": SDKTESTER1A_NATIVE1_ID_TOKEN,
             "access_token": "invalid_access_token"}
@@ -114,6 +115,35 @@ class OAuthTokenResponseTests(CapturedIOTestCase):
             self.assertIn(server_data["expires_at_seconds"],
                           (expected - 1, expected, expected + 1))
 
+    def test_by_scopes(self):
+        """
+        Gets by_scopes attribute from test response,
+        Confirms expected values found for top and other tokens
+        """
+        by_scopes = self.response.by_scopes
+
+        # confirm data by server matches known token values
+        for scope, token in [("scope1", self.top_token),
+                             ("scope2", self.other_token1),
+                             ("scope3", self.other_token2),
+                             ("scope4", self.other_token2),
+                             ("scope3 scope4", self.other_token2),
+                             ("scope4 scope3", self.other_token2)]:
+            scope_data = by_scopes[scope]
+            for key in ["scope", "access_token",
+                        "refresh_token", "token_type"]:
+                self.assertEqual(scope_data[key], token[key])
+            # assumes test runs within 1 second range
+            expected = int(time.time()) + token["expires_in"]
+            self.assertIn(scope_data["expires_at_seconds"],
+                          (expected - 1, expected, expected + 1))
+
+        self.assertIn('scope1', by_scopes)
+        self.assertIn('scope3', by_scopes)
+        self.assertNotIn('scope1 scope2', by_scopes)
+        self.assertNotIn('scope1 scope3', by_scopes)
+        self.assertIn('scope4 scope3', by_scopes)
+
     @retry_errors()
     def test_decode_id_token_invalid_id(self):
         """
@@ -159,7 +189,8 @@ class OAuthDependentTokenResponseTests(CapturedIOTestCase):
             "resource_server": "server2", "expires_in": 20, "scope": "scope2",
             "access_token": "AT2", "refresh_token": "RT2", "token_type": "2"}
         self.token3 = {
-            "resource_server": "server3", "expires_in": 30, "scope": "scope3",
+            "resource_server": "server3", "expires_in": 30,
+            "scope": "scope3 scope4",
             "access_token": "AT3", "refresh_token": "RT3", "token_type": "3"}
 
         # create the response
@@ -188,3 +219,32 @@ class OAuthDependentTokenResponseTests(CapturedIOTestCase):
             expected = int(time.time()) + token["expires_in"]
             self.assertIn(server_data["expires_at_seconds"],
                           (expected - 1, expected, expected + 1))
+
+    def test_by_scopes(self):
+        """
+        Gets by_scopes attribute from test response,
+        Confirms expected values found for top and other tokens
+        """
+        by_scopes = self.response.by_scopes
+
+        # confirm data by server matches known token values
+        for scope, token in [("scope1", self.token1),
+                             ("scope2", self.token2),
+                             ("scope3", self.token3),
+                             ("scope4", self.token3),
+                             ("scope3 scope4", self.token3),
+                             ("scope4 scope3", self.token3)]:
+            scope_data = by_scopes[scope]
+            for key in ["scope", "access_token",
+                        "refresh_token", "token_type"]:
+                self.assertEqual(scope_data[key], token[key])
+            # assumes test runs within 1 second range
+            expected = int(time.time()) + token["expires_in"]
+            self.assertIn(scope_data["expires_at_seconds"],
+                          (expected - 1, expected, expected + 1))
+
+        self.assertIn('scope1', by_scopes)
+        self.assertIn('scope3', by_scopes)
+        self.assertNotIn('scope1 scope2', by_scopes)
+        self.assertNotIn('scope1 scope3', by_scopes)
+        self.assertIn('scope4 scope3', by_scopes)

Add `by_scopes` form (or similar) to token response
This is pretty much just another presentation of the same data that we put into `OAuthTokenResponse.by_resource_server`.

Although instinctively I'd just generate this as a dict, I don't think that's right. IMO, `tokens.by_scopes['openid profile']` should do the same thing as `tokens.by_scopes['openid']`
So, `by_scopes` should really be a small class which has `__getitem__` defined as doing `.split(' ')`, getting all indexed values, `KeyError` if num values != 1


We _could_ do this with `tokens.get_by_scopes('openid profile')`, but I don't think this is in any way fundamentally easier than a dict-like with sophisticated access.
Is this too fancy?
tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py::OAuthTokenResponseTests::test_by_scopes tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py::OAuthDependentTokenResponseTests::test_by_scopes
tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py::OAuthTokenResponseTests::test_by_resource_server tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py::OAuthTokenResponseTests::test_convert_token_info_dict tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py::OAuthTokenResponseTests::test_decode_id_token_expired tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py::OAuthTokenResponseTests::test_decode_id_token_invalid_id tests/unit/responses/test_token_response.py::OAuthDependentTokenResponseTests::test_by_resource_server