🚩 Report: Illegal or restricted content

#2
by DevilRollAO3 - opened

This is literally copyright and in the description says that the data has their own CCL or is public domain. They are posting licensed stuff that doesn't belong to them again. Photography and more. They've done this now towards so many things.

That really did not take you that long to steal more work. From artfolds to AO3 and now this. Dude everyone knows black eye peas shit are copyrighted. Seriously?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain

CCL is not public domain determining by levels. You yourself have added whether they are public domain or have a license.
"A CC license is used when an author wants to give other people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that the author has created. CC provides an author flexibility (for example, they might choose to allow only non-commercial uses of a given work) and protects the people who use or redistribute an author's work from concerns of copyright infringement as long as they abide by the conditions that are specified in the license by which the author distributes the work."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_license

Having a license for a work does not always mean "It's mine and you can only look at it". Also SVGFind does not contain work with -ND licensing in general. Attribution is available for all works, including Public Domain (see "ATTRIBUTION" directory).

https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses

Having a license for a work does not always mean "It's mine and you can only look at it". Also SVGFind does not contain work with -ND licensing in general. Attribution is available for all works, including Public Domain (see "ATTRIBUTION" directory).

https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses

Did you even actually look at this link yourself? Also your SVGFind can make mistakes. I know for a fact black eyed peas and office 360 do not allow commercial use which this is what it would be considered. Maybe you could actually use this knowledge and respond to AO3 authors.

Of course, if you read the existing Creative Commons licenses, you will see that some licenses prohibit commercial use, as well as impose additional restrictions (e.g., mandatory attribution of the author)

@nyuuzyou What is wrong with you? What is seriously wrong with you? Do you seriously not understand that we do NOT want this?!? PLEASE TAKE THESE TIHNGS DOWN!!!! THERE ARE PLENTY THAT YOU CAN USE, PLENTY THAT PEOPLE CONSENT TO!!!!

@nyuuzyou What is wrong with you? What is seriously wrong with you? Do you seriously not understand that we do NOT want this?!? PLEASE TAKE THESE TIHNGS DOWN!!!! THERE ARE PLENTY THAT YOU CAN USE, PLENTY THAT PEOPLE CONSENT TO!!!!

Honestly i believe Nyuuzyou is a person who doesn't believe in consent in multiple matters. The amount of people saying they didn't consent and nyuuzyou ignoring it makes me believe in person they don't believe of consent in relationships or friendships either.

@DevilRollAO3 Reminds me of rapists, man. Same thing these shitheads are doing, I really hope they're locked behind bars or go to hell (literally).

@DevilRollAO3 Reminds me of rapists, man. Same thing these shitheads are doing, I really hope they're locked behind bars or go to hell (literally).

Agreed. OTW legal is already going after it as well as another art and writing company called PaperDemon

Your need to confirm your account before you can post a new comment.

Sign up or log in to comment